-
BMJ Open Oct 2023Very few studies and limited information are available regarding the mechanism of fibrosis in tuberculosis (TB). This study aimed to identify, describe and synthesise... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
Very few studies and limited information are available regarding the mechanism of fibrosis in tuberculosis (TB). This study aimed to identify, describe and synthesise potential biomarkers of the development of tissue fibrosis induced by TB through a systematic method and meta-analysis.
METHODS
A literature search was performed using keywords according to the topic from electronic databases (ScienceDirect and PubMed) and other methods (websites, organisations and citations). Studies that matched predetermined eligibility criteria were included. The quality assessment tool used was the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Score 2, and the data obtained were processed using Review Manager V.5.3.
RESULTS
Of the 305 studies, 7 met the eligibility criteria with a total sample of 365. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the post-TB group of patients with pulmonary parenchymal fibrosis had a higher transforming growth factor (TGF)-β level (6.09) than the control group (1.82), with a 4.27 (95% CI: 0.92 to 7.61) mean difference. Moreover, patients with residual pleural thickening post-TB had a higher mean of TGF-β (0.61) than the control group (0.56), with a 0.05 (95% CI: 0.04 to 0.06) mean difference. Besides TGF-β, our qualitative synthesis also found that matrix metalloproteinase-1 might have a role in forming and developing pulmonary tissue fibrosis, thus, could be used as a predictor marker in the formation of fibrotic lesions in patients with TB. In addition, several other biomarkers were assessed in the included studies, such as tumour necrosis factor-α, interleukin (IL)-4, IL-8, IL-10, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 and platelet-derived growth factor. However, this study is not intended to examine these biomarkers.
CONCLUSIONS
There were differences in the results of TGF-β levels in patients with fibrotic lesions compared with controls. TGF-β might be a biomarker of fibrotic tissue formation or increased pulmonary tissue fibrosis in post-TB patients. However, further studies are needed on a larger scale.
Topics: Humans; Transforming Growth Factor beta; Tuberculosis; Fibrosis; Pulmonary Fibrosis; Biomarkers; Matrix Metalloproteinases; Transforming Growth Factors
PubMed: 37827747
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070377 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2021Given the expanding clinical applications of laparoscopic surgery and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer treatment, there is an emerging need to...
BACKGROUND
Given the expanding clinical applications of laparoscopic surgery and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer treatment, there is an emerging need to summarize the few evidences that evaluated the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).
METHODS
From January 1 to 2, 2021, we searched Ovid Embase, PubMed, Cochrane central register Trials (Ovid), and web of science to find relevant studies published in English, and two authors independently performed literature screening, quality assessment of the included studies, data extraction, and data analysis. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021228845).
RESULTS
The initial search retrieved 1567 articles, and 6 studies were finally included in the meta-analysis review, which comprised 2 randomized control trials and 4 observational studies involving 288 laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) and 416 open gastrectomy (OG) AGC patients treated with NAC. For intraoperative conditions, R0 resection rate, blood transfusion, intraoperative blood loss, number of lymph nodes dissected, proximal margin, and distal margin were comparable between LG group and open OG group. For postoperative short-term clinical outcomes, LG has significantly less postoperative complications (OR = 0.65, 95%CI: 0.42-1.00, p = 0.05) and shorter postoperative time to first aerofluxus (WMD = -0.57d, 95%CI: -0.89-0.25, p = 0.0004) than OG, and anastomotic leakage, pulmonary infection, pleural effusion, surgical site infection, thrombosis, intestinal obstruction, peritoneal effusion or abscess formation, postoperative time to first defecation, postoperative time to first liquid diet, and postoperative length of stay were comparable between the two groups. For postoperative survival outcomes, there were no significant differences in disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) between the two groups.
CONCLUSION
The available evidences indicated that LG is an effective and feasible technology for the treatment of AGC patients treated with NAC, and LG patients have much less postoperative complications and faster bowel function recovery than OG patients.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO database (identifier, CRD42021228845).
PubMed: 34422658
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.704244 -
Journal of Medical Ultrasound 2020The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has now infected six million people and is responsible for nearly four hundred thousand deaths. We review the potential... (Review)
Review
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has now infected six million people and is responsible for nearly four hundred thousand deaths. We review the potential role of the lung ultrasound to evaluate its benefits and potential roles to compare it to the current gold standard of computed tomography. A literature search was carried out utilizing electronic search engines and databases with COVID-19. Keywords related to the lung ultrasound (LUS) were used to refine this search - only the relevant articles found are cited. This review showed that there exists a strong correlation between the CT and LUS scan in COVID-19. Prominent features include the vertical B-lines, thicker pleural lines, and subpleural consolidation. Potential roles include reducing transmission between health-care workers and monitoring the progress of the disease. However, the current research is scarce compared to well-established imaging modalities, and as such, there is a necessity for more research to confirm the findings of this review.
PubMed: 33659158
DOI: 10.4103/JMU.JMU_87_20 -
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis Jan 2022Tuberculosis poses a severe threat to human health. At present, compared with the traditional diagnostic methods for tuberculosis pleural effusion, such as... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Tuberculosis poses a severe threat to human health. At present, compared with the traditional diagnostic methods for tuberculosis pleural effusion, such as Löwenstein-Jensen culture, pleural biopsy, and Ziehl-Neelsen smear microscopy, Xpert MTB/RIF was regarded as an emerging technology for its efficiency. The Xpert MTB/RIF accuracy for tuberculous pleural effusion diagnosis was evaluated in this systematic study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We searched the relevant literature published before January 2021 in PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases. Utilizing Review Manager 5.3 software, the quality of the included literature was evaluated based on the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies criteria. Sensitivity, specificity, and the summary receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted and analyzed with Metadisc 1.40 software. We used Stata 12.0 software to evaluate the publication bias of this study.
RESULTS
Eighteen articles were identified in total. The sensitivity of Xpert MTB/RIF in the pleural effusion was 0.24, and specificity was 1.00, respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.9737, which indicated that the overall accuracy of the Xpert MTB/RIF was high. In addition, based on the Deeks funnel plot, no publication bias of the study was found.
CONCLUSION
Xpert MTB/RIF is a rapid method with high specificity but relatively low sensitivity for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis in pleural effusion. Its less sensitivity made it difficult to be used clinically, but the high specificity suggests that it can be used as a specific diagnostic method for tuberculous pleural effusion.
Topics: Humans; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques; Pleural Effusion; ROC Curve; Reference Standards; Sensitivity and Specificity; Tuberculosis
PubMed: 34919739
DOI: 10.1002/jcla.24185 -
Medicine May 2022The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert Ultra) and Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) for the diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert Ultra) and Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) for the diagnosis of tuberculous pleurisy (TBP) head-to-head using meta-analysis method.
METHODS
On May 12, 2021, we searched multiple databases for reports that used Xpert Ultra and Xpert for TBP diagnosis head-to-head and screened eligible studies for inclusion. Accuracy of Xpert Ultra and Xpert were compared to that of the composite reference standard (CRS) and culture. When heterogeneity was evident, sources of heterogeneity were explored using subgroup analyses, sensitivity analysis, and meta-regression analyses.
RESULTS
Five articles met the inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. When results from different specimens or different reference standards were reported in the same article, we analyzed them as separate studies. Thus, 6 studies compared Xpert Ultra and Xpert with CRS, 5 studies compared Xpert Ultra and Xpert with culture. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of Xpert Ultra were 52% and 98% compared to CRS, and 82% and 77% compared to culture. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of Xpert were 22% and 99% compared to CRS, and 48% and 94% compared to culture. Significant heterogeneity in sensitivity was observed compared to CRS.
CONCLUSION
The sensitivity of Xpert Ultra was moderate but better than that of the Xpert; however, its specificity was lower. The role of Xpert Ultra and Xpert in the early and rapid diagnosis of TBP was limited.
Topics: Antibiotics, Antitubercular; Humans; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Sensitivity and Specificity; Tuberculosis, Pleural; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary
PubMed: 35608435
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029363 -
Annals of Palliative Medicine Feb 2021The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an emerging pandemic of global public health concern. We aimed to summarize the characteristics of COVID-19 patients in the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an emerging pandemic of global public health concern. We aimed to summarize the characteristics of COVID-19 patients in the early stage of the pandemic and explore the risk factors of disease progression.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis, searching three databases for studies published between January 1, 2020, and March 18, 2020. We used random-effects models to calculate the 95% confidence intervals of pooled estimated prevalence and the odds ratio between the severe and nonsevere cases.
RESULTS
Ninety studies involving 16,526 COVID-19 patients were included. Hypertension (19.1%) and diabetes (9.5%) were the most common comorbidities. The most prevalent clinical symptoms were fever (78.4%), cough (58.5%), and fatigue (26.4%). Increased serum ferritin (74.2%), high C-reactive protein (73.3%), and high erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (72.2%) were the most frequently reported laboratory abnormalities. Most patients had bilateral lung involvement (82.2%) and showed peripheral (66.9%) and subpleural (62.1%) distribution, with multifocal involvement (73.1%). And the most common CT features were vascular enlargement (64.3%), ground-glass opacity (GGO) (60.7%), and thickened interlobular septa (55.1%). Respiratory failure was the most common complication (30.7%) and the overall case-fatality rate (CFR) was 4.2%. Moreover, male, history of smoking, and comorbidities might influence the prognosis. Most clinical symptoms such as fever, high fever, cough, sputum production, fatigue, shortness of breath, dyspnoea, and abdominal pain were linked to the severity of disease. Some specific laboratory indicators implied the deterioration of disease, such as leucocytosis, lymphopenia, platelet, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), albumin, creatinine, creatine kinase (CK), lactic dehydrogenase (LDH), C-reactive protein, procalcitonin (PCT), and D-dimer. Besides, the risk of bilateral pneumonia, consolidation, pleural effusion, and enlarged mediastinal nodes was higher in severe cases.
CONCLUSIONS
Most COVID-19 patients have fever and cough with lymphopenia and increased inflammatory indices, and the main CT feature is GGO involved bilateral lung. Patients with comorbidities and worse clinical symptoms, laboratory characteristics, and CT findings tend to have poor disease progression.
Topics: Biomarkers; COVID-19; Comorbidity; Cough; Fever; Humans; Inflammation; Lung; Lymphopenia; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
PubMed: 33548996
DOI: 10.21037/apm-20-1863 -
Clinical Imaging Feb 2021We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of chest CT findings in patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of chest CT findings in patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection.
METHODS
Systematic review of the literature was performed using PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar to retrieve original studies on chest CT findings of patients with confirmed COVID-19, available up to 10 May 2020. Data on frequency and distribution of chest CT findings were extracted from eligible studies, pooled and meta-analyzed using random-effects model to calculate the prevalence of chest CT findings.
RESULTS
Overall, 103 studies (pooled population: 9907 confirmed COVID-19 patients) were meta-analyzed. The most common CT findings were ground-glass opacities (GGOs) (77.18%, 95%CI = 72.23-81.47), reticulations (46.24%, 95%CI = 38.51-54.14), and air bronchogram (41.61%, 95%CI = 32.78-51.01). Pleural thickening (33.35%, 95%CI = 21.89-47.18) and bronchial wall thickening (15.48%, 95%CI = 8.54-26.43) were major atypical and airway findings. Lesions were predominantly distributed bilaterally (75.72%, 95%CI = 70.79-80.06) and peripherally (65.64%, 95%CI = 58.21-72.36), while 8.20% (95%CI = 6.30-10.61) of patients had no abnormal findings and pre-existing lung diseases were present in 6.01% (95%CI = 4.37-8.23).
CONCLUSIONS
The most common CT findings in COVID-19 are GGOs with/without consolidation, reticulations, and air bronchogram, which often involve both lungs with peripheral distribution. However, COVID-19 might present with atypical manifestations or no abnormal findings in chest CT, which deserve clinicians' notice.
Topics: COVID-19; Humans; Lung; Retrospective Studies; SARS-CoV-2; Thorax; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
PubMed: 33142125
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.10.035 -
Journal of Global Health Jul 2022This systematic review aimed to describe common aetiologies of severe and non-severe community acquired pneumonia among children aged 1 month to 9 years in low- and...
BACKGROUND
This systematic review aimed to describe common aetiologies of severe and non-severe community acquired pneumonia among children aged 1 month to 9 years in low- and middle-income countries.
METHODS
We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed online databases for studies published from January 2010 to August 30, 2020. We included studies on acute community-acquired pneumonia or acute lower respiratory tract infection with ≥1 year of continuous data collection; clear consistent case definition for pneumonia; >1 specimen type (except empyema studies where only pleural fluid was required); testing for >1 pathogen including both viruses and bacteria. Two researchers reviewed the studies independently. Results were presented as a narrative summary. Quality of evidence was assessed with the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. The study was registered on PROSPERO [CRD42020206830].
RESULTS
We screened 5184 records; 1305 duplicates were removed. The remaining 3879 titles and abstracts were screened. Of these, 557 articles were identified for full-text review, and 55 met the inclusion criteria - 10 case-control studies, three post-mortem studies, 11 surveillance studies, eight cohort studies, five cross-sectional studies, 12 studies with another design and six studies that included patients with pleural effusions or empyema. Studies which described disease by severity showed higher bacterial detection (Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus) in severe vs non-severe cases. The most common virus causing severe disease was respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). Pathogens varied by age, with RSV and adenovirus more common in younger children. Influenza and atypical bacteria were more common in children 5-14 years than younger children. Malnourished and HIV-infected children had higher rates of pneumonia due to bacteria or tuberculosis.
CONCLUSIONS
Several viral and bacterial pathogens were identified as important targets for prevention and treatment. Bacterial pathogens remain an important cause of moderate to severe disease, particularly in children with comorbidities despite widespread PCV and Hib vaccination.
Topics: Child; Community-Acquired Infections; Cross-Sectional Studies; Developing Countries; Humans; Infant; Pneumonia; Respiratory Syncytial Viruses; Vaccination
PubMed: 35866332
DOI: 10.7189/jogh.12.10009 -
Archivos Espanoles de Urologia Dec 2022Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) requires perforating the kidney, which may damage part of the patient's nephron. Further, compared with single-channel PCNL (S-PCNL),... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) requires perforating the kidney, which may damage part of the patient's nephron. Further, compared with single-channel PCNL (S-PCNL), the safety of multi-channel PCNL (M-PCNL) and whether it affects the renal function of patients has been debated. The meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the safety of M-PCNL.
METHODS
We carefully searched the Pubmed, Embass, and Web of Science databases for relevant research reported before October 30, 2021, and analyzed the included literature using the Stata software. Changes in the serum creatinine levels, split renal function and the incidence of postoperative complications were used to evaluate the safety of M-PCNL.
RESULTS
Overall, 11 articles were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that there was no statistically significant difference between S-PCNL and M-PCNL in terms of changes in serum creatinine levels (pooled Mean Difference (MD) = -0.015, 95% CI: -0.047-0.018, I = 0.0%, = 0.92). Further, a sensitivity analysis showed that our conclusions were stable. With the -values in both Egger's and Begg's tests being greater than 0.05, there was no significant publication bias in the included literature. A subgroup analysis based on patient ethnicity yielded consistent results. Our meta-analysis yielded similar results in terms of changes in split renal function (pooled MD = 0.008, 95% CI: -0.013-0.030, I = 96%, < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative renal perforation between M-PCNL and S-PCNL (pooled Odds Ratio (OR) = 1.686, 95% CI: 0.677-4.193, I = 0.0%, = 0.66). However, M-PCNL was found to cause more postoperative blood transfusion, postoperative infection, and pleural damage than S-PCNL (pooled OR = 3.104, 95% CI: 2.277-4.232, I = 46%, = 0.03, pooled OR = 1.862, 95% CI: 1.165-2.974, I = 0%, = 0.46, and pooled OR = 3.446, 95% CI: 1.168-10.171, I = 0%, = 1.00 respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
Compared with S-PCNL, M-PCNL showed no significant differences in terms of changes in serum creatinine levels in patients. However, M-PCNL showed a greater probability of resulting in postoperative blood transfusion, postoperative infection, and pleural damage.
Topics: Humans; Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous; Kidney Calculi; Creatinine; Length of Stay; Kidney; Postoperative Complications; Treatment Outcome; Nephrostomy, Percutaneous
PubMed: 36651092
DOI: 10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20227510.120 -
Pulmonology 2021The COVID-19 pandemic originated in China and within about 4 months affected individuals all over the world. One of the limitations to the management of the COVID-19 is... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
The COVID-19 pandemic originated in China and within about 4 months affected individuals all over the world. One of the limitations to the management of the COVID-19 is the diagnostic imaging to evaluate lung impairment and the patients' clinical evolution, mainly, in more severe cases that require admission into the intensive care unit. Among image examinations, lung ultrasound (LU) might be a useful tool to employ in the treatment of such patients.
METHODS
A survey was carried out on PubMed to locate studies using the descriptors: ((Lung ultrasound OR ultrasound OR lung ultrasonography OR lung US) AND (coronavirus disease-19 OR coronavirus disease OR corona virus OR COVID-19 OR COVID19 OR SARS-CoV-2)). The period covered by the search was November 2019 to October 2020 and the papers selected reported LU in COVID-19.
RESULTS
Forty-three studies were selected to produce this systematic review. The main LU findings referred to the presence of focal, multifocal and/or confluent B lines and the presence of pleural irregularities.
CONCLUSIONS
The use of LU in the evaluation of patients with COVID-19 should be encouraged due to its intrinsic characteristics; a low cost, radiation free, practical method, with easy to sanitize equipment, which facilitates structural evaluation of lung damage caused by SARS-CoV-2. With the increase in the number of studies and the use of ultrasound scans, LU has been shown as a useful tool to evaluate progression, therapeutic response and follow-up of pulmonary disease in the patients with COVID-19.
Topics: COVID-19; COVID-19 Testing; Disease Progression; Humans; Lung; Pandemics; Ultrasonography
PubMed: 33931378
DOI: 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2021.02.004