-
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery Apr 2023Surgical approach is the most effective treatment for primary spontaneous pneumothorax. The two most widely adopted surgical methods are mechanical abrasion and apical... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Surgical approach is the most effective treatment for primary spontaneous pneumothorax. The two most widely adopted surgical methods are mechanical abrasion and apical pleurectomy, in addition to bullectomy. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine which technique is superior in treating primary spontaneous pneumothorax.
METHODS
PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for studies published between January 2000 to September 2022 comparing mechanical abrasion and apical pleurectomy for treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax. The primary outcome was pneumothorax recurrence. Secondary outcomes included post-operative chest tube duration, hospital length of stay, operative time and intra-operative of blood loss.
RESULTS
Eight studies were eligible for inclusion involving 1,613 patients. There was no difference in the rate of pneumothorax recurrence between pleural abrasion and pleurectomy (RR: 1.34; 95% CI: 0.94 to 1.92). However, pleural abrasion led to shorter hospital length of stay (MD: -0.25; 95% CI: -0.51 to 0.00), post-operative chest tube duration (MD: -0.30; 95% CI: -0.56 to -0.03), operative time (MD: -13.00; 95% CI -15.07 to 10.92) and less surgical blood loss (MD: -17.77; 95% CI: -24.36 to -11.18).
CONCLUSION
Pleural abrasion leads to less perioperative patient burden and shorter hospital length of stay without compromising the rate of pneumothorax recurrence when compared to pleurectomy. Thus, pleural abrasion is a reasonable first choice surgical procedure for management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax.
Topics: Humans; Pneumothorax; Pleura; Pleurodesis; Recurrence; Thoracic Surgical Procedures; Treatment Outcome; Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted
PubMed: 37024894
DOI: 10.1186/s13019-023-02207-3 -
Cureus Jul 2021Hereditary multiple exostoses (HME) are an autosomal dominant skeletal disorder characterized by the development of multiple benign osteochondromas (exostoses) that... (Review)
Review
Hereditary multiple exostoses (HME) are an autosomal dominant skeletal disorder characterized by the development of multiple benign osteochondromas (exostoses) that frequently involve long bones of the body. Less commonly, the ribs are a site of involvement, and long-term friction between an exostosis and pleura can produce a hemothorax or pneumothorax. The purpose of this study is to provide a comprehensive review of existing literature on pneumothorax or hemothorax secondary to costal exostosis in HME patients. We reviewed the databases of PubMed and Embase and included data as current as of February 15, 2021. All case reports included cases of hemothorax or pneumothorax in patients with a known personal or family history of HME. After evaluation for inclusion based on eligibility criteria, 18 cases were included. The average age at presentation was 11.7 years (range: 3-32), and most patients were male (83%). Hemothoraces occurred in 15 cases, while pneumothoraces occurred in three cases. All cases were evaluated using chest X-ray and CT scan, and the majority of the cases were treated with surgical resection of the exostosis, either with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS; 61%) or thoracotomy (22%). Outcomes were successful with no cases of recurrence after surgical intervention. Although rare, costal exostosis should be considered as a differential in patients presenting with pneumothorax or hemothorax and past medical history or physical exam findings suggestive of HME. Immediate evaluation and surgical intervention to resect costal exostosis are essential to reduce the risk of recurrent life-threatening injury.
PubMed: 34395113
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.16326 -
Medeniyet Medical Journal 2020The aim of this review is to examine the effects of COVID-19 on Tuberculosis (TB) management and to highlight evidence of the extent of TB and COVID-19 co-infection.... (Review)
Review
The aim of this review is to examine the effects of COVID-19 on Tuberculosis (TB) management and to highlight evidence of the extent of TB and COVID-19 co-infection. Current findings on TB and COVID-19 have been identified using six databases: Pubmed, Science Direct, Pubmed Central, MedXRiv, Wiley, and Google Scholar. This search in literature was conducted up to 8 May 2020. We included five studies that met the selection criteria. These selected studies have been performed in regions having various demographic characteristics including developed and developing countries, mainly China. The total number of participants in each study ranged from 24 to 203. The case fatality rate of patients with TB and COVID-19 co-infection was found to be high (6/49; 12.3 percent) while a combined diagnosis of TB and COVID-19 was found in 9/49 patients. This condition is linked to several complications, manifested as the need for ex novo oxygen supply, pneumothorax, and extreme hypoxia. Researches on BCG vaccination have shown that countries without vaccination policy are more likely to be seriously affected than those with BCG vaccination programs. COVID-19 infection in patients with TB or the lack of sufficient BCG vaccination may be associated with higher detrimental consequences, including mortality.
PubMed: 33717627
DOI: 10.5222/MMJ.2020.36775 -
Swiss Medical Weekly Aug 2021Numerous ECG alterations due to pneumothorax have been reported. The objective of the study was to establish the presence of ECG changes associated with pneumothorax in...
BACKGROUND
Numerous ECG alterations due to pneumothorax have been reported. The objective of the study was to establish the presence of ECG changes associated with pneumothorax in the literature, and in a cohort of patients with proven pneumothorax compared with age- and sex-matched healthy controls.
METHODS
A systematic review for ECG alterations associated with pneumothorax was performed. We then reviewed our hospital database for patients with pneumothorax and identified all patients with an ECG available at this time. The retrieved ECG alterations in the systematic review were identified in our pneumothorax patients and compared with a healthy sex- and age-matched control group. Accordingly, we calculated sensitivity and specificity for all alterations.
RESULTS
Seventeen ECG alterations were found and defined from the systematic review. Our pneumothorax cohort consisted of 82 pneumothorax patients and 82 control patients. Specificity was mostly more than 90%, but sensitivities were low. Phasic R voltage (pneumothorax group 25.6% vs control group 1.2%), T-wave inversion (31.7% vs 2.4%), prolonged QTc (11.0% vs 2.4%), right axis deviation (14.6% vs 3.6%) and QRS voltage ratio in aVF/I >2 (41.5% vs 22.0%) were significantly more frequent in pneumothorax patients compared with controls.
CONCLUSION
The sensitivity of published ECG signs in predicting pneumothorax in our cohort was low, which means that ECG findings are an unsuitable tool for pneumothorax screening. However, presence of these ECG signs might raise a suspicion of pneumothorax in patients presenting with dyspnoea, or unclear chest discomfort.
Topics: Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Case-Control Studies; Dyspnea; Electrocardiography; Humans; Pneumothorax
PubMed: 34495608
DOI: 10.4414/SMW.2021.w30041 -
Annals of Palliative Medicine Jan 2023Commonly used clinical treatments for intracranial hypertension include continuous lumbar cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CLCFD) and conventional lumbar puncture. However,...
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of cerebrospinal fluid drainage and lumbar puncture in the treatment of cerebrospinal fluid leakage after craniocerebral injury.
BACKGROUND
Commonly used clinical treatments for intracranial hypertension include continuous lumbar cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CLCFD) and conventional lumbar puncture. However, lumbar puncture is more invasive, requires multiple punctures. CLCFD has less trauma, and drainage can be manipulated to avoid repeated lumbar puncture. However, CLCFD may also lead to complications such as intracranial hematoma and intracranial pneumothorax. Therefore, there is no agreement on which method is more effective. This study evaluated the efficacy of CLCFD and conventional lumbar puncture in the treatment of cerebrospinal fluid leakage after craniocerebral injury.
METHODS
The search terms 'brain injury' and 'CLCFD' were used to search CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, Longyuan, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and other databases (from inception to November 1, 2022). Inclusion criteria: (I) randomized controlled trials (RCTs), CLCFD and conventional lumbar puncture drainage for patients with cerebrospinal fluid leakage after craniocerebral injury; (II) evaluation of indicators such as cerebrospinal fluid leakage stop time, clearance time, intracranial infection and complications. Cochrane systematic review was performed to assess the quality of the literature. RevMan 5.3 software was used for systematic analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 8 studies, involving 568 patients. There is some publication bias in the statistics. The cessation time of cerebrospinal fluid leakage (95% confidence interval (CI): -3.65 to -2.86, Z=16.21, P<0.00001), the time to return to normal pressure (95% CI: -3.13 to -2.09, Z=9.79, P<0.00001), cerebrospinal fluid clearing time (95% CI: -1.96 to -1.09, Z=6.91, P<0.00001), hospitalization time (95% CI: -1.99 to -0.91, Z=5.27, P<0.00001), incidence of intracranial infection (95% CI: 0.07-0.27, Z=5.84, P<0.00001) and complications (95% CI: 0.10-0.43, Z=4.22, P<0.0001) in the CLCFD group were lower than those in the conventional group. The cure rate of the CLCFD group was significantly higher than that of the conventional group (OR =3.75, 95% CI: 2.26-6.23, Z=5.11, P<0.00001); the difference in mortality between the two groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Compared with conventional lumbar puncture, CLCFD can significantly increase the cure rate, shorten the recovery time of cerebrospinal fluid, and significantly reduce the incidence of intracranial infections, reduce complications, is conducive to the prognosis of patients.
PubMed: 36747386
DOI: 10.21037/apm-22-1302 -
Medical Ultrasonography Mar 2023To assess chest ultrasound (US) diagnostic accuracy in pneumothorax diagnosing. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
AIM
To assess chest ultrasound (US) diagnostic accuracy in pneumothorax diagnosing.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Prospec-tive studies related to the US pneumothorax diagnostic accuracy in trauma patients were extensively searched from 2000 up to November 2020. The studies features and findings were gathered using a standardised form and the methodological quality of the investigations was evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2).
RESULTS
Twelve articles were finally chosen for quantitative analysis. The overall sensitivity of US scan in pneumothorax diagnosis was 89% (95%CI 86-91%). Specificity was 96% (95%CI 95-97%). The diagnostic odds ratio was 193.94 (59.009-637.40) at 95%CI, thus demonstrating high chest US accuracy in pneumothorax diagnosis.
CONCLUSION
Despite the limitations of the included studies, this systematic review and meta-analysis concluded that chest US is a reliable method for diagnosing pneu-mothorax in traumatized patients.
Topics: Humans; Pneumothorax; Sensitivity and Specificity; Thoracic Injuries; Ultrasonography; Wounds, Nonpenetrating
PubMed: 35437526
DOI: 10.11152/mu-3309 -
Cureus Jun 2023The systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endobronchial stent placement for malignant airway obstruction. A comprehensive search was conducted... (Review)
Review
The systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endobronchial stent placement for malignant airway obstruction. A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases to identify relevant studies. Cohort studies, randomized controlled trials, and case-control studies examining the outcomes of endobronchial stent placement in patients with malignant airway obstruction were included. Data on pre-treatment evaluation, such as pulmonary function testing, dyspnea severity scoring systems, arterial blood gas parameters, imaging, and degree of obstruction, were also collected. Primary outcomes of interest included post-procedure stenosis, pulmonary function testing evaluation, blood gas parameters, and survival outcomes. Secondary outcomes encompassed improvements in clinical status, dyspnea grade, and procedure-related complications. A total of 27 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review. The included studies demonstrated promising outcomes of endobronchial stent placement in managing malignant airway obstruction. Post-procedure airway diameters, pulmonary function testing, and blood gas parameters improved significantly. Survival outcomes varied among studies. Furthermore, endobronchial stent placement was associated with improvements in clinical status and dyspnea grade. Procedure-related complications ranged from pain, hemoptysis and mucus plugging to stent obstruction, migration and pneumothorax. This systematic review suggests that endobronchial stent placement is an effective and safe intervention for managing malignant airway obstruction. It offers significant improvements in post-procedure stenosis, pulmonary function testing, blood gas parameters, and clinical outcomes. However, further studies with larger sample sizes and standardized reporting are warranted to better evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of endobronchial stent placement for malignant airway obstruction.
PubMed: 37496555
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.40912 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jun 2022Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) represents the most severe course of COVID-19 (caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus), usually resulting in a prolonged stay in an... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) represents the most severe course of COVID-19 (caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus), usually resulting in a prolonged stay in an intensive care unit (ICU) and high mortality rates. Despite the fact that most affected individuals need invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), evidence on specific ventilation strategies for ARDS caused by COVID-19 is scarce. Spontaneous breathing during IMV is part of a therapeutic concept comprising light levels of sedation and the avoidance of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA). This approach is potentially associated with both advantages (e.g. a preserved diaphragmatic motility and an optimised ventilation-perfusion ratio of the ventilated lung), as well as risks (e.g. a higher rate of ventilator-induced lung injury or a worsening of pulmonary oedema due to increases in transpulmonary pressure). As a consequence, spontaneous breathing in people with COVID-19-ARDS who are receiving IMV is subject to an ongoing debate amongst intensivists.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the benefits and harms of early spontaneous breathing activity in invasively ventilated people with COVID-19 with ARDS compared to ventilation strategies that avoid spontaneous breathing.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register (which includes CENTRAL, PubMed, Embase, Clinical Trials.gov WHO ICTRP, and medRxiv) and the WHO COVID-19 Global literature on coronavirus disease to identify completed and ongoing studies from their inception to 2 March 2022.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Eligible study designs comprised randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated spontaneous breathing in participants with COVID-19-related ARDS compared to ventilation strategies that avoided spontaneous breathing (e.g. using NMBA or deep sedation levels). Additionally, we considered controlled before-after studies, interrupted time series with comparison group, prospective cohort studies and retrospective cohort studies. For these non-RCT studies, we considered a minimum total number of 50 participants to be compared as necessary for inclusion. Prioritised outcomes were all-cause mortality, clinical improvement or worsening, quality of life, rate of (serious) adverse events and rate of pneumothorax. Additional outcomes were need for tracheostomy, duration of ICU length of stay and duration of hospitalisation.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We followed the methods outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Two review authors independently screened all studies at the title/abstract and full-text screening stage. We also planned to conduct data extraction and risk of bias assessment in duplicate. We planned to conduct meta-analysis for each prioritised outcome, as well as subgroup analyses of mortality regarding severity of oxygenation impairment and duration of ARDS. In addition, we planned to perform sensitivity analyses for studies at high risk of bias, studies using NMBA in addition to deep sedation level to avoid spontaneous breathing and a comparison of preprints versus peer-reviewed articles. We planned to assess the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach.
MAIN RESULTS
We identified no eligible studies for this review.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
We found no direct evidence on whether early spontaneous breathing in SARS-CoV-2-induced ARDS is beneficial or detrimental to this particular group of patients. RCTs comparing early spontaneous breathing with ventilatory strategies not allowing for spontaneous breathing in SARS-CoV-2-induced ARDS are necessary to determine its value within the treatment of severely ill people with COVID-19. Additionally, studies should aim to clarify whether treatment effects differ between people with SARS-CoV-2-induced ARDS and people with non-SARS-CoV-2-induced ARDS.
Topics: COVID-19; Humans; Neuromuscular Blocking Agents; Respiration, Artificial; Respiratory Distress Syndrome; SARS-CoV-2; Systematic Reviews as Topic
PubMed: 35767435
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD015077 -
Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular... Dec 2022The best treatment strategy for primary spontaneous pneumothorax is controversial and varies widely in practice. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
The best treatment strategy for primary spontaneous pneumothorax is controversial and varies widely in practice.
METHODS
Literatures were searched from databases till 24 August 2021. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted to compare the outcomes of various treatments with the following endpoints: recurrence rate, postoperative chest tube duration, postoperative air leakage duration, length of hospital stay, and complications rate.
RESULTS
In all, 7210 patients of 20 randomized controlled trials and 17 cohort studies were included. Surgery had a significantly lower recurrence rate compared to other treatments. Besides, bullectomy (BT) combined with chemical pleurodesis (CP), mechanical pleurodesis, or staple line coverage (SLC) can reduce the recurrence rate compared to BT alone, but none of them were statistically significant. In terms of reducing chest tube duration, BT with tubular Neoveil outperformed BT + pleural abrasion (mean difference [MD], 95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.5 [-4.63, -0.35]) and BT + apical pleurectomy (MD, 95% CI: -2.72 [-5.16, -0.27]).
CONCLUSIONS
Surgical methods were superior to manual aspiration (MA), chest tube drainage (CTD), and conservative treatment in terms of recurrence reduction. There was no significant difference between MA and CTD in reducing the recurrence rate. Among surgical methods, CP is more effective than mechanical pleurodesis and SLC among the additional procedures based on BT.
Topics: Humans; Pneumothorax; Network Meta-Analysis; Bayes Theorem; Treatment Outcome; Recurrence; Pleurodesis; Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted
PubMed: 36002271
DOI: 10.5761/atcs.oa.22-00113 -
Journal of Thoracic Disease Jul 2021Cases of spontaneous pneumothorax have been described in patients suffering from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia. The aim of this study is to... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Cases of spontaneous pneumothorax have been described in patients suffering from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia. The aim of this study is to systematically review all the cases of spontaneous pneumothorax that occurred in healthy patients with no underlying lung disease and who did not receive invasive mechanical ventilation.
METHODS
A PubMed research was conducted. The following data were collected: age, sex, side of the pneumothorax, smoking habit, time form onset of symptoms to the diagnosis of pneumothorax, the development of new bullous lesions on computed tomography and the type of treatment. In order to analyze the most homogeneous population possible, intubated patients were deliberately excluded. In total, 44 cases of spontaneous pneumothorax in otherwise healthy patients were taken into account. Since the available data were extracted from small observational studies, no particular bias risk assessment was performed. Descriptive statistics were used to synthesize results.
RESULTS
There were 37 male (84.1%) and 6 female (13.6%) patients. The majority of patients (66%) were treated only by chest tube thoracostomy, which most of the times resulted in a complete resolution of the pneumothorax. Simple surveillance was applied in 10 cases. Three patients underwent minimally invasive surgery. In 14 cases (31.8%) air-filled lesions were detected on imaging. Eleven patients received corticosteroids during their hospital stay. In the majority of cases (86.3%) the pneumothorax was resolved.
DISCUSSION
Even if the level of evidence, derived from case reports and small case series is low, the existence of a true secondary spontaneous pneumothorax due to SARS-CoV-2 should be recognized. Imaging techniques should be repeated throughout the clinical course of the patients in order to detect newly developed pulmonary complications. Surgical treatment is feasible and patients whose general condition permits, should be offered surgery according to the existing guidelines regarding spontaneous pneumothorax. National registries and databases are necessary in order to better understand the pathogenesis and complications of this novel entity.
PubMed: 34422378
DOI: 10.21037/jtd-21-208