-
Journal of Periodontal Research Apr 2022One of the most important families of proteases associated with periodontal disease is the family of the matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). Their activity is regulated by... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
One of the most important families of proteases associated with periodontal disease is the family of the matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). Their activity is regulated by tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs), and an imbalance between MMP activity and regulation by TIMPs has been associated with the progression of periodontal disease. This strong interaction between TIMPs and MMPs might be an indication that TIMPs can be used as a biomarker to monitor periodontal disease progression in oral fluids. In particular, TIMP-1 is a frequently studied biomarker for periodontal diseases. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the scientific literature regarding TIMP-1 concentrations in oral fluids of patients suffering from periodontitis or gingivitis in comparison to healthy individuals.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
PubMed/ MedLine and Web of Science databases were searched electronically. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were systematically evaluated and assessed for eligibility and risk of bias. Meta-analysis was performed through the random effects model to assess the association between periodontitis/gingivitis and TIMP-1 concentration in stimulated saliva, unstimulated saliva, and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF).
RESULTS
The search strategy provided a total of 322 studies of which 10 studies met all inclusion criteria. Two studies investigated TIMP-1 concentrations in GCF, three studies in unstimulated saliva, and five studies investigated TIMP-1 concentrations in stimulated saliva. Three studies revealed that TIMP-1 levels in oral fluids were significantly decreased in periodontal disease. Meta-analysis revealed that there is no statistically significant difference between TIMP-1 concentration in oral fluids of periodontitis/gingivitis patients in comparison to healthy individuals.
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review with meta-analysis shows that periodontal diseases are not associated with a statistically significant change in TIMP-1 concentration in oral fluids.
Topics: Biomarkers; Gingival Crevicular Fluid; Gingivitis; Humans; Matrix Metalloproteinase 8; Periodontal Diseases; Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinase-1
PubMed: 34850390
DOI: 10.1111/jre.12957 -
Endocrine Journal Jun 2021This review evaluated the risk of rheumatoid arthritis in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (Dpp-4i). The MEDLINE (via... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
This review evaluated the risk of rheumatoid arthritis in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (Dpp-4i). The MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, the Cochrane Library databases and web of science were used to search the effects of Dpp-4i on rheumatoid arthritis in patients with type 2 diabetes from inception to 7 September, 2020. We included studies that met the following criteria:(i) A randomized controlled trial (RCT), prospective or retrospective cohort study examining the relationship between Dpp-4i and rheumatoid arthritis. Exclusion criteria included the following: Reviews and researches related to other diseases or subjects; and studies without data on the prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis were excluded. Risk of Bias table contained in Review Manager 5.3 and Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) were used for quality assessment of included RCT and observational studies separately. Meta-analysis was used to estimate the risk of disease. We conducted a subgroup analysis of duration of follow-up, adjusted (adjusted RR or unadjusted RR), sample size and study design. A total of 10 independent studies assessing 1,420,414 patients were included in this analysis. In this meta-analysis, we found that there was nonsignificant increase of rheumatoid arthritis with Dpp-4 inhibitor exposure (RR 0.96, 95%CI (0.69-1.32)). Our results revealed that Dpp-4 inhibitors do not seem to increase the risk of rheumatoid arthritis. Long-term follow-up monitoring is necessary.
Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents
PubMed: 33642418
DOI: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ20-0647 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2022The dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) drugs, such as evogliptin, as the second-line drugs for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treatment have been reported to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
The dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) drugs, such as evogliptin, as the second-line drugs for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treatment have been reported to facilitate insulin secretion by reducing glucagon and inhibiting glucagon like peptides. With a vague consensus, the advantageous and non-inferior effects of evogliptin relative to other DPP-4i drugs were recently demonstrated on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels and overall adverse events in T2DM patients. Thus, the aim was to evaluate the overall influence of evogliptin on HbA1c levels and the adverse events in T2DM patients compared to sitagliptin and linagliptin.
METHODS
Complying with PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic literature search in databases and a meta-analysis. Data about HbA1c levels and the adverse events of T2DM patients were collected and analyzed.
RESULTS
From 1,397 studies, we found five matched studies involving 845 subjects (mean age: 54.7 ± 3 years). The meta-analysis revealed that evogliptin was non-inferior to sitagliptin/linagliptin with a mean difference of 0.062 (95% CI: -0.092 to 0.215. I: 0%. = 0.431) regarding the HbA1c level reduction, and the risk ratio was -0.006 (95% CI: -0.272 to 0.260. I: 1.7%. = 0.966) regarding the adverse effects, indicating no significant difference between evogliptin and linagliptin or sitagliptin in affecting the HbA1c level and adverse effects.
CONCLUSION
The study provides preliminary evidence regarding the similarity in the efficacy of evogliptin compared to other DPP-4i drugs, including sitagliptin and linagliptin, for managing HbA1c levels and adverse events.
Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Linagliptin; Middle Aged; Piperazines; Sitagliptin Phosphate
PubMed: 36060938
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.962385 -
Annals of Palliative Medicine Jun 2021This study aimed to explore the efficacy of trypsin inhibitors in the treatment of severe pancreatitis (SP) by meta-analysis. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
This study aimed to explore the efficacy of trypsin inhibitors in the treatment of severe pancreatitis (SP) by meta-analysis.
METHODS
The Boolean logic retrieval method was adopted to recruit the relevant literature. Chinese and English databases were respectively searched using a combination of the following search terms: "trypsin inhibitor", "acute pancreatitis", and "severe pancreatitis". The trypsin-treated SP group was set as the experimental group, and the blank control was set as the control group. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software provided by the Cochrane system.
RESULTS
A total of 12 references were included. The meta-analysis suggested that the heterogeneity test results of pancreatic infection incidence were Chi2 =0.51, degrees of freedom (df) =7, I2=0%<50%, and P=1.00>0.01, with risk ratio (RR): 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI): (0.64, 1.01), Z=1.88, and P=0.06. The heterogeneity test results of extra-pancreatic infection incidence were Chi2 =0.20, df =5, I2=0%<50%, and P=1.00>0.01, with RR: 0.81, 95% CI: (0.62, 1.05), Z=1.60, and P=0.11. The heterogeneity test results of the length of hospital stay were Tau2 =65.69, Chi2 =75.05, df =6, I2=92%>50%, and P<0.0001. The length of hospital stay of the experimental group was shorter than that of the control group, with mean difference (MD): -23.31 and the 95% CI: (-29.60, -17.02), and the difference was statistically significant (Z=7.26, P<0.0001). The heterogeneity test results of the inflammatory factor tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) level were Chi2 =67.28, df =3, I2=96%>50%, and P<0.0001. The level of TNF-α in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group, with MD: -11.69, 95% CI: (-12.51, -10.87), and the difference was statistically significant (Z=27.88, P<0.0001). The heterogeneity test results of the mortality rate were Chi2 =2.52, df =5, I2=0%<50%, and P=0.77>0.01. The mortality rate of the experimental group was lower than that of the control group, with RR: 0.27 and 95% CI: (0.19, 0.40), and the difference was notable (Z=6.75, P<0.0001).
DISCUSSION
The meta-analysis performed in this study confirmed that trypsin inhibitors can inhibit the release of inflammatory factors and reduce mortality rate of SP patients.
Topics: Humans; Length of Stay; Pancreatitis; Trypsin Inhibitors
PubMed: 34154357
DOI: 10.21037/apm-21-1206 -
Nutrition, Metabolism, and... Sep 2021Meta-analyses of randomized trials on Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) reported discordant results on major cardiovascular events (MACE), mortality, and heart... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors: An extensive meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
AIMS
Meta-analyses of randomized trials on Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) reported discordant results on major cardiovascular events (MACE), mortality, and heart failure. Aim of this meta-analysis of randomized trials is the assessment of the cardiovascular safety of DPP4i.
DATA SYNTHESIS
A Medline, Embase, Cochrane database search for sitagliptin, vildagliptin, omarigliptin, saxagliptin, alogliptin, trelagliptin, anagliptin, linagliptin, gemigliptin, evogliptin, and teneligliptin was performed up to up January 1st, 2020. All trials with a duration ≥24 weeks and comparing the effects of DPP4i with placebo or active drugs were collected. Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio (MH-OR) with 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI) was calculated for all outcomes defined above. A total of 182 eligible trials were identified. DPP-4i were not associated with an increased risk of MACE (MH-OR 0.99 [0.93, 1.04]), all-cause mortality (MH-OR 0.99 [0.93, 1.06]), and heart failure (MH-OR 1.05 [0.96, 1.15]) with no significant differences across individual molecules, except for saxagliptin, which was associated with an increased risk of heart failure.
CONCLUSIONS
As a class, DPP4i are not associated with any increase or reduction of MACE, all-cause mortality, and heart failure. Saxagliptin seems to be associated with an increased risk of hospitalization for heart failure.
Topics: Adamantane; Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Female; Heart Disease Risk Factors; Heart Failure; Hospitalization; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34364771
DOI: 10.1016/j.numecd.2021.06.002 -
BMC Medicine Oct 2022Hormonal changes during the menstrual cycle play a key role in shaping immunity in the cervicovaginal tract. Cervicovaginal fluid contains cytokines, chemokines,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Hormonal changes during the menstrual cycle play a key role in shaping immunity in the cervicovaginal tract. Cervicovaginal fluid contains cytokines, chemokines, immunoglobulins, and other immune mediators. Many studies have shown that the concentrations of these immune mediators change throughout the menstrual cycle, but the studies have often shown inconsistent results. Our understanding of immunological correlates of the menstrual cycle remains limited and could be improved by meta-analysis of the available evidence.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of cervicovaginal immune mediator concentrations throughout the menstrual cycle using individual participant data. Study eligibility included strict definitions of the cycle phase (by progesterone or days since the last menstrual period) and no use of hormonal contraception or intrauterine devices. We performed random-effects meta-analyses using inverse-variance pooling to estimate concentration differences between the follicular and luteal phases. In addition, we performed a new laboratory study, measuring select immune mediators in cervicovaginal lavage samples.
RESULTS
We screened 1570 abstracts and identified 71 eligible studies. We analyzed data from 31 studies, encompassing 39,589 concentration measurements of 77 immune mediators made on 2112 samples from 871 participants. Meta-analyses were performed on 53 immune mediators. Antibodies, CC-type chemokines, MMPs, IL-6, IL-16, IL-1RA, G-CSF, GNLY, and ICAM1 were lower in the luteal phase than the follicular phase. Only IL-1α, HBD-2, and HBD-3 were elevated in the luteal phase. There was minimal change between the phases for CXCL8, 9, and 10, interferons, TNF, SLPI, elafin, lysozyme, lactoferrin, and interleukins 1β, 2, 10, 12, 13, and 17A. The GRADE strength of evidence was moderate to high for all immune mediators listed here.
CONCLUSIONS
Despite the variability of cervicovaginal immune mediator measurements, our meta-analyses show clear and consistent changes during the menstrual cycle. Many immune mediators were lower in the luteal phase, including chemokines, antibodies, matrix metalloproteinases, and several interleukins. Only interleukin-1α and beta-defensins were higher in the luteal phase. These cyclical differences may have consequences for immunity, susceptibility to infection, and fertility. Our study emphasizes the need to control for the effect of the menstrual cycle on immune mediators in future studies.
Topics: Elafin; Female; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor; Humans; Immunoglobulins; Immunologic Factors; Interferons; Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein; Interleukin-16; Interleukin-1alpha; Interleukin-6; Interleukins; Lactoferrin; Menstrual Cycle; Muramidase; Progesterone; beta-Defensins
PubMed: 36195867
DOI: 10.1186/s12916-022-02532-9 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Feb 2023Vascular surgery may be followed by internal bleeding due to inadequate surgical haemostasis, abnormal clotting, or surgical complications. Bleeding ranges from minor,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Vascular surgery may be followed by internal bleeding due to inadequate surgical haemostasis, abnormal clotting, or surgical complications. Bleeding ranges from minor, with no transfusion requirement, to massive, requiring multiple blood product transfusions. There are a number of drugs, given systemically or applied locally, which may reduce the need for blood transfusion.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effectiveness and safety of anti-fibrinolytic and haemostatic drugs and agents in reducing bleeding and the need for blood transfusion in people undergoing major vascular surgery or vascular procedures with a risk of moderate or severe (> 500 mL) blood loss.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; MEDLINE; Embase; CINAHL, and Transfusion Evidence Library. We also searched the WHO ICTRP and ClinicalTrials.gov trial registries for ongoing and unpublished trials. Searches used a combination of MeSH and free text terms from database inception to 31 March 2022, without restriction on language or publication status.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in adults of drug treatments to reduce bleeding due to major vascular surgery or vascular procedures with a risk of moderate or severe blood loss, which used placebo, usual care or another drug regimen as control.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were units of red cells transfused and all-cause mortality. Our secondary outcomes included risk of receiving an allogeneic blood product, risk of reoperation or repeat procedure due to bleeding, risk of a thromboembolic event, risk of a serious adverse event and length of hospital stay. We used GRADE to assess certainty of evidence.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 22 RCTs with 3393 participants analysed, of which one RCT with 69 participants was reported only in abstract form, with no usable data. Seven RCTs evaluated systemic drug treatments (three aprotinin, two desmopressin, two tranexamic acid) and 15 RCTs evaluated topical drug treatments (drug-containing bioabsorbable dressings or glues), including fibrin, thrombin, collagen, gelatin, synthetic sealants and one investigational new agent. Most trials were conducted in high-income countries and the majority of the trials only included participants undergoing elective surgery. We also identified two ongoing RCTs. We were unable to perform the planned network meta-analysis due to the sparse reporting of outcomes relevant to this review. Systemic drug treatments We identified seven trials of three systemic drugs: aprotinin, desmopressin and tranexamic acid, all with placebo controls. The trials of aprotinin and desmopressin were small with very low-certainty evidence for all of our outcomes. Tranexamic acid versus placebo was the systemic drug comparison with the largest number of participants (2 trials; 1460 participants), both at low risk of bias. The largest of these included a total of 9535 individuals undergoing a number of different higher risk surgeries and reported limited information on the vascular subgroup (1399 participants). Neither trial reported the number of units of red cells transfused per participant up to 30 days. Three outcomes were associated with very low-certainty evidence due to the very wide confidence intervals (CIs) resulting from small study sizes and low number of events. These were: all-cause mortality up to 30 days; number of participants requiring an allogeneic blood transfusion up to 30 days; and risk of requiring a repeat procedure or operation due to bleeding. Tranexamic acid may have no effect on the risk of thromboembolic events up to 30 days (risk ratio (RR) 1.10, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.36; 1 trial, 1360 participants; low-certainty evidence due to imprecision). There is one large ongoing trial (8320 participants) comparing tranexamic acid versus placebo in people undergoing non-cardiac surgery who are at high risk of requiring a red cell transfusion. This aims to complete recruitment in April 2023. This trial has primary outcomes of proportion of participants transfused with red blood cells and incidence of venous thromboembolism (DVT or PE). Topical drug treatments Most trials of topical drug treatments were at high risk of bias due to their open-label design (compared with usual care, or liquids were compared with sponges). All of the trials were small, most were very small, and few reported clinically relevant outcomes in the postoperative period. Fibrin sealant versus usual care was the topical drug comparison with the largest number of participants (5 trials, 784 participants). The five trials that compared fibrin sealant with usual care were all at high risk of bias, due to the open-label trial design with no measures put in place to minimise reporting bias. All of the trials were funded by pharmaceutical companies. None of the five trials reported the number of red cells transfused per participant up to 30 days or the number of participants requiring an allogeneic blood transfusion up to 30 days. The other three outcomes were associated with very low-certainty evidence with wide confidence intervals due to small sample sizes and the low number of events, these were: all-cause mortality up to 30 days; risk of requiring a repeat procedure due to bleeding; and risk of thromboembolic disease up to 30 days. We identified one large trial (500 participants) comparing fibrin sealant versus usual care in participants undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, which has not yet started recruitment. This trial lists death due to arterial disease and reintervention rates as primary outcomes.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Because of a lack of data, we are uncertain whether any systemic or topical treatments used to reduce bleeding due to major vascular surgery have an effect on: all-cause mortality up to 30 days; risk of requiring a repeat procedure or operation due to bleeding; number of red cells transfused per participant up to 30 days or the number of participants requiring an allogeneic blood transfusion up to 30 days. There may be no effect of tranexamic acid on the risk of thromboembolic events up to 30 days, this is important as there has been concern that this risk may be increased. Trials with sample size targets of thousands of participants and clinically relevant outcomes are needed, and we look forward to seeing the results of the ongoing trials in the future.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Aprotinin; Blood Transfusion; Deamino Arginine Vasopressin; Fibrin Tissue Adhesive; Hemorrhage; Network Meta-Analysis; Tranexamic Acid
PubMed: 36800489
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013649.pub2 -
European Heart Journal Jul 2022Trastuzumab and anthracyclines, often used in the treatment of breast cancer, may impair myocardial function, and reduce left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF),... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
A systematic review and meta-analysis of beta-blockers and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors for preventing left ventricular dysfunction due to anthracyclines or trastuzumab in patients with breast cancer.
AIMS
Trastuzumab and anthracyclines, often used in the treatment of breast cancer, may impair myocardial function, and reduce left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), potentially causing heart failure. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have evaluated the effects of beta-blockers (BBs), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) on trastuzumab- and anthracycline-associated cardiotoxicity. We report a meta-analysis of these RCTs in patients with breast cancer.
METHODS AND RESULTS
The primary analysis was on the effect of BBs and ACEI/ARBs on LVEF in patients treated with either trastuzumab or anthracyclines. A secondary analysis was done investigating the effect of BBs or ACEI/ARBs on LVEF in trastuzumab and anthracycline treatments. Only RCTs were included using the search term 'ARBs, ACEIs, BBs, anthracyclines, trastuzumab, and breast cancer' in PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL up to 31 March 2021. A meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the mean difference (MD) in LVEF between intervention and placebo groups at follow-up. A total of nine RCTs (n = 1362) were included in the analysis. All patients were women. BBs and ACEI/ARBs were shown to attenuate the decline in LVEF during trastuzumab and anthracycline treatments [MD: 2.4; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.3-4.2 and MD: 1.5; 95% CI: -0.6 to 3.7]. Compared with placebo, LVEF was significantly higher in patients assigned to BB or ACEI/ARB on trastuzumab (MD: 2.3; 95% CI: 0.0-4.6) but not on anthracyclines (MD: 1.9; 95% CI: -0.5 to 4.2).
CONCLUSION
Both BB and ACEI/ARB therapies were associated with the preservation of LVEF during trastuzumab and anthracycline-containing regimens as compared with placebo, suggesting both to be beneficial.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Anthracyclines; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Antihypertensive Agents; Breast Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Renin-Angiotensin System; Stroke Volume; Trastuzumab; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left
PubMed: 34951629
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab843 -
Primary Care Diabetes Feb 2022This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesize the latest evidence on the effect of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-IV) inhibitor in patients with COVID-19. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesize the latest evidence on the effect of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-IV) inhibitor in patients with COVID-19.
METHODS
We performed a systematic literature search from the PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Clinicaltrials.gov up until 15 July 2021. Studies that met the following criteria were included: prospective or retrospective observational studies or case series or randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting DPP-IV inhibitor use in patients with COVID-19 and mortality. The intervention group was patients receiving DPP-IV inhibitor. The control group was patients that did not receive DPP-IV inhibitor. The outcome was mortality reported as odds ratio (OR).
RESULTS
There were 11 studies consisting of 5950 patients in this meta-analysis. DPP-IV inhibitor use was associated with reduced mortality (OR 0.75 [0.56, 0.99], p = 0.043, I: 42.9, p = 0.064) compared to those that did not receive DPP-IV inhibitor. Sensitivity analysis using the fixed-effect model (OR 0.75 [0.63, 0.88], p < 0.001, I: 42.9, p = 0.064) also showed mortality benefit. The association between DPP-IV inhibitor and mortality was not significantly affected by age (p = 0.540), sex (p = 0.054), hypertension (p = 0.320), location (continent; p = 0.532), and retrospective/prospective nature of the study (p = 0.840). However, the association was affected by metformin (OR 1.03 [95% CI 1.01, 1.06], p = 0.010) and ACEI/ARB use (OR 1.06 [95% CI 1.02, 1.10], p = 0.004).
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis showed that DPP-IV inhibitor was associated with reduced mortality in patients with COVID-19.
Topics: COVID-19; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; SARS-CoV-2
PubMed: 34952805
DOI: 10.1016/j.pcd.2021.12.008 -
Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) Aug 2022Confirmatory tests are recommended for diagnosing primary aldosteronism, but the supporting evidence is unclear. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Confirmatory tests are recommended for diagnosing primary aldosteronism, but the supporting evidence is unclear.
METHODS
We searched Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Studies evaluating any guideline-recommended confirmatory test (ie, saline infusion test, salt loading test, fludrocortisone suppression test, and captopril challenge test), compared with a reference standard were included. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Meta-analyses were conducted using hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic models.
RESULTS
Fifty-five studies were included, comprising 26 studies (3654 participants) for the recumbent saline infusion test, 4 studies (633 participants) for the seated saline infusion test, 2 studies (99 participants) for the salt loading test, 7 studies (386 participants) for the fludrocortisone suppression test, and 25 studies (2585 participants) for the captopril challenge test. Risk of bias was high, affecting more than half of studies, and across all domains. Studies with case-control sampling overestimated accuracy by 7-fold (relative diagnostic odds ratio, 7.26 [95% CI, 2.46-21.43]) and partial verification or use of inconsistent reference standards overestimated accuracy by 5-fold (5.12 [95% CI, 1.48-17.77]). There were large variations in how confirmatory tests were conducted, interpreted, and verified. Under most scenarios, confirmatory testing resulted in an excess of missed cases. The certainty of evidence underlying each test (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) was very low.
CONCLUSIONS
Recommendations for confirmatory testing in patients with abnormal screening tests and high probability features of primary aldosteronism are based on very low-quality evidence and their routine use should be reconsidered.
Topics: Captopril; Fludrocortisone; Humans; Hyperaldosteronism; ROC Curve; Sensitivity and Specificity
PubMed: 35652330
DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.122.19377