-
Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical... 2021To provide the latest evidence on the efficacy and safety of lopinavir/ritonavir compared to other treatment options for COVID-19. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
To provide the latest evidence on the efficacy and safety of lopinavir/ritonavir compared to other treatment options for COVID-19.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Cochran Library, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science for the relevant records up to April 2021. Moreover, we scanned MedRxiv, Google Scholar, and clinical registry databases to identify additional records. We have used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane risk of bias tools to assess the quality of studies. This Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan software (version 5.3).
RESULTS
Fourteen studies were included. No significant difference was observed between lopinavir/ritonavir and non-antiviral treatment groups in terms of negative rate of PCR (polymerase chain reaction) on day 7 (risk ratio [RR]: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.63 to 1.09; P=0.17), and day 14 (RR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.81 to 1.05; P=0.25), PCR negative conversion time (mean difference [MD]: 1.09; 95% CI: -0.10 to 2.29; P=0.07), secondary outcomes, and adverse events (P>0.05). There was no significant difference between lopinavir/ritonavir and chloroquine as well as lopinavir/ritonavir and hydroxychloroquine regarding the efficacy outcomes (P>0.05). However, lopinavir/ritonavir showed better efficacy than arbidol for the same outcomes (P<0.05). Lopinavir/ritonavir plus arbidol was effective compared to arbidol alone in terms of the negative rate of PCR on day 7 (P=0.02). However, this difference was not significant regarding other efficacy outcomes (P>0.05).
CONCLUSION
Lopinavir/ritonavir has no more treatment effects than other therapeutic agents used herein in COVID-19 patients.
Topics: COVID-19; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Hydroxychloroquine; Lopinavir; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Retrospective Studies; Ritonavir; COVID-19 Drug Treatment
PubMed: 34048671
DOI: 10.18433/jpps31668 -
Medicine Oct 2022The additive effects of ezetimibe, evolocumab or alirocumab on lipid level, plaque volume, and plaque composition using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) remain unclear. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The additive effects of ezetimibe, evolocumab or alirocumab on lipid level, plaque volume, and plaque composition using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) remain unclear.
METHODS
According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses statement, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of trials assessing the effects of ezetimibe, evolocumab, and alirocumab on coronary atherosclerosis using IVUS. The primary outcome was change in total atheroma volume (TAV), and the secondary outcomes were changes and differences in plaque composition and lipid content.
RESULTS
Data were collected from 9 trials, involving 917 patients who received ezetimibe, evolocumab or alirocumab in addition to a statin and 919 patients who received statins alone. The pooled estimate demonstrated a significant reduction in TAV with the addition of ezetimibe and favorable effects of evolocumab and alirocumab on TAV. Subgroup analysis also supported favorable effects of evolocumab and alirocumab on TAV, according to baseline TAV, gender, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and prior stain use. Addition of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor to statin therapy resulted in significant reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), and triglycerides (TG), but not in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). The pooled estimate also showed significant favorable effects of ezetimibe on LDL-C, TC, and TG, but an insignificant effect on HDL-C. Patients who received ezetimibe showed similar changes in the necrotic core, fibro-fatty plaque, fibrous plaque, and dense calcification compared with patients not treated with ezetimibe.
CONCLUSIONS
The addition of ezetimibe to statin therapy may further reduce plaque and lipid burdens but may not modify plaque composition. Although current evidence supports a similar impact from the addition of PCSK9 inhibitors to statin therapy, more evidence is needed to confirm such an effect.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Anticholesteremic Agents; Cholesterol, HDL; Cholesterol, LDL; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Ezetimibe; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; PCSK9 Inhibitors; Plaque, Atherosclerotic; Proprotein Convertase 9; Subtilisins; Triglycerides; Ultrasonography, Interventional
PubMed: 36254013
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000031199 -
Hellenic Journal of Cardiology : HJC =... 2022The real-world implementation of heart failure (HF) guidelines remains unclear. Our present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the rate of HF patients... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The real-world implementation of heart failure (HF) guidelines remains unclear. Our present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the rate of HF patients receiving guideline-directed treatment to identify the proportion of under-treatment patients and those who are treated with optimal doses, to evaluate the correlation of under-treatment patients' characteristics with the prescribed therapy, and finally, to evaluate the combined effect of the above on incidental mortality and rehospitalization. We conducted a systematic review of the literature indexed in Medline. We screened 1224 papers and excluded 1166 as they did not meet the inclusion criteria. Of the remaining 58 papers, which were evaluated by studying the full text, 11 papers that referred to 45866 patients were finally studied in this work. Angiotensin-Converting-Enzyme Inhibitor (ACEI) and Angiotensin II-Receptor Blocker (ARB) use was estimated to be 80.9% (95% CI: 73.9%, 86.4%), β-blockers' use was 78% (95% CI: 70.4%, 84.1%), Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists' use was 47.4% (95% Cl 41.6%, 53.4%), and cardiac resynchronization therapy's use was 5.8% (95% Cl 3.4%, 9.6%). Meta-regression analysis showed that prescription of more than the half of target dose of ACEI/ARBs was found to be associated with reduced all-cause mortality (Z = -3.61, P = 0.0003), while the relationship with β-blockers was borderline (Z = -1.56, P = 0.11). A satisfactory adherence to the prescription of guideline-recommended treatment in patients with HF was observed. However, the under titration of the life-saving HF drugs need to be improved as only ultimate adherence to guideline-directed treatments may lead to the reduction of HF burden.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Humans; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Stroke Volume
PubMed: 35508296
DOI: 10.1016/j.hjc.2022.04.006 -
Drugs in Context 2019Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare genetic disorder, characterized by recurrent and unexpected potentially life-threatening mucosal swelling. The impairment... (Review)
Review
Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare genetic disorder, characterized by recurrent and unexpected potentially life-threatening mucosal swelling. The impairment underlying HAE could be a defect in C1-inhibitor activity, or in its serum concentration. Patients affected by HAE should be treated with on-demand or prophylactic drugs. Lifelong C1-inhibitor supplementation is sometimes required. In this review, we review the currently approved drugs for HAE due to C1-inhibitor defect and to describe those under research. In particular, we focused on the mechanisms of action, routes of administration, and efficacy of these therapies. A systematic review of the literature was performed using the PubMed database for original articles and clinical trials of HAE treatments from 2005 to 2019. The approved HAE treatments can minimize the risk of death, but they are not effective in complete healing from the disease. The new gene therapies seem to provide promising opportunities for the treatment of hereditary angioedema. However, there are still many unmet needs, including efficacy, route, and timing of administration.
PubMed: 31645881
DOI: 10.7573/dic.212605 -
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Dec 2021The aim of this study was to continually evaluate the association between cardiovascular drug exposure and COVID-19 clinical outcomes (susceptibility to infection,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
AIMS
The aim of this study was to continually evaluate the association between cardiovascular drug exposure and COVID-19 clinical outcomes (susceptibility to infection, disease severity, hospitalization, hospitalization length, and all-cause mortality) in patients at risk of/with confirmed COVID-19.
METHODS
Eligible publications were identified from more than 500 databases on 1 November 2020. One reviewer extracted data with 20% of the records independently extracted/evaluated by a second reviewer.
RESULTS
Of 52 735 screened records, 429 and 390 studies were included in the qualitative and quantitative syntheses, respectively. The most-reported drugs were angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) with ACEI/ARB exposure having borderline association with confirmed COVID-19 infection (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.00-1.31). Among COVID-19 patients, unadjusted estimates showed that ACEI/ARB exposure was associated with hospitalization (OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.34-2.32), disease severity (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.26-1.55) and all-cause mortality (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.12-1.33) but not hospitalization length (mean difference -0.27, 95% CI -1.36-0.82 days). After adjustment, ACEI/ARB exposure was not associated with confirmed COVID-19 infection (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.71-1.19), hospitalization (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.70-1.24), disease severity (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.81-1.38) or all-cause mortality (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.70-1.00). Similarly, subgroup analyses involving only hypertensive patients revealed that ACEI/ARB exposure was not associated with confirmed COVID-19 infection (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.79-1.09), hospitalization (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.58-1.22), hospitalization length (mean difference -0.14, 95% CI -1.65-1.36 days), disease severity (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.76-1.11) while it decreased the odds of dying (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.65-0.88). A similar trend was observed for other cardiovascular drugs. However, the validity of these findings is limited by a high level of heterogeneity and serious risk of bias.
CONCLUSION
Cardiovascular drugs are not associated with poor COVID-19 outcomes in adjusted analyses. Patients should continue taking these drugs as prescribed.
Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; COVID-19; Cardiovascular Agents; Humans; SARS-CoV-2
PubMed: 34101232
DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14927 -
Cureus Sep 2022Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) primarily affects the immune systems, which, if progressed, will lead to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Currently, there... (Review)
Review
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) primarily affects the immune systems, which, if progressed, will lead to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Currently, there is no effective cure for the disease, and patients are affected lifelong, but there are antiretroviral medications that can control the disease's symptoms and progression. In addition, taking precautions during sexual contact, especially in the male homosexual population, while handling the patient's bodily fluids such as blood and saliva, and during childbirth by an infected mother is necessary to prevent the transmission of the virus. We used 15 studies, including systematic reviews and meta-analyses, observation studies, randomized clinical trials, and comprehensive reviews, to determine how HIV interferes with heart disease, increasing morbidity and mortality. We have used specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, focusing on specified age groups within a particular timeline. Some of the included studies found that many side effects from antiretroviral drugs can impact heart conditions, along with HIV, while others did not show a strong correlation between HIV and some heart diseases. In conclusion, after reviewing the literature, the results are inconclusive. More extensive trials focusing on the impact HIV has on heart disease are required to establish a strong correlation between HIV and heart disease to prevent morbidity and mortality.
PubMed: 36237744
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.28960 -
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Nov 2022Observational studies have investigated the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) used in nonvalvular atrial... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Effectiveness and safety of intracranial events associated with the use of direct oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 92 studies.
AIMS
Observational studies have investigated the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) used in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the risk of ischaemic stroke, thromboembolism (TE) and intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) associated with the use of DOACs and VKAs.
METHODS
Medline and Embase were systematically searched until April 2021. Observational studies were gathered and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were extracted. Subgroup analyses based on DOAC doses, history of chronic kidney disease, stroke, exposure to VKA, age and sex were performed. A random-effects model was used.
RESULTS
We included 92 studies and performed 107 comparisons. Apixaban was associated with lower risk of stroke (HR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.68-0.99) compared to dabigatran. Rivaroxaban was associated with lower risk of stroke (HR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.83-0.98) compared to VKA. Dabigatran (HR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.80-0.91), rivaroxaban (HR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.77-0.89) and apixaban (HR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.65-0.86) were associated with lower risk for TE/stroke compared to VKA. Apixaban (HR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.03-1.68) and rivaroxaban (HR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.31-1.89) were associated with higher risk of ICH compared to dabigatran. Dabigatran (HR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.44-0.52), apixaban (HR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.49-0.73) and rivaroxaban (HR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.65-0.81) were associated with lower risk of ICH compared to VKA.
CONCLUSION
Our study demonstrated significant differences in the risk of ischaemic stroke, TE/stroke and ICH associated with individual DOACs compared to both other DOACs and VKA.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Atrial Fibrillation; Brain Ischemia; Dabigatran; Humans; Intracranial Hemorrhages; Ischemic Stroke; Pyridones; Rivaroxaban; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Vitamin K
PubMed: 35853612
DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15464 -
Journal of the American Heart... Apr 2024Concomitant atrial fibrillation and end-stage renal disease is common and associated with an unfavorable prognosis. Although oral anticoagulants have been well... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Concomitant atrial fibrillation and end-stage renal disease is common and associated with an unfavorable prognosis. Although oral anticoagulants have been well established to prevent thromboembolism, the applicability in patients under long-term dialysis remains debatable. The study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of anticoagulation in the dialysis-dependent population.
METHODS AND RESULTS
An updated network meta-analysis based on MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was performed. Studies published up to December 2022 were included. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban 2.5/5 mg twice daily), vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), and no anticoagulation were compared on safety and efficacy outcomes. The outcomes of interest were major bleeding, thromboembolism, and all-cause death. A total of 42 studies, including 3 randomized controlled trials, with 185 864 subjects were pooled. VKAs were associated with a significantly higher risk of major bleeding than either no anticoagulation (hazard ratio [HR], 1.47; 95% CI, 1.34-1.61) or DOACs (DOACs versus VKAs; HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.64-0.84]). For the prevention of thromboembolism, the efficacies of VKAs, DOACs, and no anticoagulation were equivalent. Nevertheless, dabigatran and rivaroxaban were associated with fewer embolic events. There were no differences in all-cause death with the administration of VKAs, DOACs, or no anticoagulation.
CONCLUSIONS
For dialysis-dependent populations, dabigatran and rivaroxaban were associated with better efficacy, while dabigatran and apixaban demonstrated better safety. No anticoagulation was a noninferior alterative, and VKAs were associated with the worst outcomes.
Topics: Humans; Atrial Fibrillation; Rivaroxaban; Dabigatran; Stroke; Network Meta-Analysis; Anticoagulants; Hemorrhage; Fibrinolytic Agents; Administration, Oral; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Thromboembolism; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 38606775
DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.123.034176 -
International Journal of Environmental... Oct 2021Population growth and water scarcity necessitate alternative agriculture practices, such as reusing wastewater for irrigation. Domestic wastewater has been used for... (Review)
Review
Population growth and water scarcity necessitate alternative agriculture practices, such as reusing wastewater for irrigation. Domestic wastewater has been used for irrigation for centuries in many historically low-income and arid countries and is becoming more widely used by high-income countries to augment water resources in an increasingly dry climate. Wastewater treatment processes are not fully effective in removing all contaminants, such as antimicrobial resistant bacteria (ARB) and antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs). Literature reviews on the impact of wastewater irrigation on antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in the environment have been inconclusive and mostly focused on treated wastewater. We conducted the first systematic review to assess the impact of irrigation with both treated or untreated domestic wastewater on ARB and ARGs in soil and adjacent water bodies. We screened titles/abstracts of 3002 articles, out of which 41 were screened in full text and 26 were included in this review. Of these, thirteen investigated irrigation with untreated wastewater, and nine found a positive association with ARB/ARGs in soil. Out of thirteen studies focused on treated wastewater, six found a positive association with ARB/ARGs while six found mixed/negative associations. Our findings demonstrate that irrigation with untreated wastewater increases AMR in soil and call for precautionary action by field workers, their families, and consumers when untreated wastewater is used to irrigate crops. The effect of irrigation with treated wastewater was more variable among the studies included in our review, highlighting the need to better understand to what extent AMR is disseminated through this practice. Future research should assess factors that modify the effect of wastewater irrigation on AMR in soil, such as the degree and type of wastewater treatment, and the duration and intensity of irrigation, to inform guidelines on the reuse of wastewater for irrigation.
Topics: Agricultural Irrigation; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Genes, Bacterial; Humans; Soil; Wastewater; Water
PubMed: 34769568
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182111046 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2023As a popular antidiabetic drug, teneligliptin has been used for over 10 years, but its efficacy and safety have rarely been systematically evaluated. Therefore, a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
As a popular antidiabetic drug, teneligliptin has been used for over 10 years, but its efficacy and safety have rarely been systematically evaluated. Therefore, a Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of teneligliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
METHODS
We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing teneligliptin with placebo or active comparators in T2DM patients for at least 12 weeks were included in the study. Data analysis was performed using R 4.2.3 and Stata 17.0 software. Each outcome was presented as a mean difference (MD) or an odds ratio (OR) along with 95% confidence interval (CI) and the surface under the cumulative ranking curve value (SUCRA).
RESULTS
A total of 18 RCTs with 3,290 participants with T2DM were included in this study. Generally, compared to placebo, sitagliptin, vildagliptin, metformin, and bromocriptine, 20 mg of teneligliptin showed better efficacy in reducing HbA1c (MD [95% CI], -0.78 [-0.86 to -0.70], -0.08 [-0.36 to 0.19], -0.04 [-0.72 to 0.60], -0.12 [-0.65 to 0.42], and -0.50 [-0.74 to -0.26], respectively) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (MD [95% CI], -18.02 [-20.64 to -15.13], 1.17 [-9.39 to 11.70], -8.06 [-30.95 to 14.35], -2.75 [-18.89 to 13.01], and -34.23 [-45.93 to -22.96], respectively), and 40 mg of teneligliptin also showed better efficacy in reducing HbA1c (MD [95% CI], -0.84 [-1.03 to -0.65], -0.15 [-0.49 to 0.19], -0.10 [-0.81 to 0.57], -0.18 [-0.76 to 0.39], and -0.56 [-0.88 to -0.26], respectively) and FPG (MD [95% CI], -20.40 [-26.07 to -14.57], -1.20 [-13.21 to 10.38], -10.43 [-34.16 to 12.65], -5.13 [-22.21 to 11.66], and -36.61 [-49.33 to -24.01], respectively). Compared to placebo, 20 mg of teneligliptin showed no significant difference in incidences of hypoglycemia and gastrointestinal adverse events (OR [95% CI], 1.30 [0.70 to 2.19] and 1.48 [0.78 to 2.98], respectively), and 40 mg of teneligliptin showed no significant difference in incidence of hypoglycemia (OR [95% CI], 2.63 [0.46 to 8.10]). Generally, antidiabetic effect and hypoglycemia risk of teneligliptin gradually increased as its dose increased from 5 mg to 40 mg. Compared to 20 mg of teneligliptin, 40 mg of teneligliptin showed superior efficacy and no-inferior safety, which was considered as the best option in reducing HbA1c, FPG, and 2h PPG and increasing proportion of the patients achieving HbA1c < 7% (SUCRA, 85.51%, 84.24%, 79.06%, and 85.81%, respectively) among all the included interventions.
CONCLUSION
Compared to sitagliptin, vildagliptin, metformin, bromocriptine, and placebo, teneligliptin displayed favorable efficacy and acceptable safety in treating T2DM. Twenty milligrams or 40 mg per day was the optimal dosage regimen of teneligliptin. The results of this study will provide important evidence-based basis for rational use of teneligliptin and clinical decision-making of T2DM medication.
Topics: Humans; Bromocriptine; Glycated Hemoglobin; Network Meta-Analysis; Vildagliptin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Metformin; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Hypoglycemic Agents; Hypoglycemia
PubMed: 38189048
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1282584