-
ESMO Open Apr 2021Approved first-line treatments for patients with BRAF V600-mutant advanced melanoma include nivolumab (a programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor) plus ipilimumab (a...
BACKGROUND
Approved first-line treatments for patients with BRAF V600-mutant advanced melanoma include nivolumab (a programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor) plus ipilimumab (a cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 inhibitor; NIVO+IPI) and the BRAF/MEK inhibitors dabrafenib plus trametinib (DAB+TRAM), encorafenib plus binimetinib (ENCO+BINI), and vemurafenib plus cobimetinib (VEM+COBI). Results from prospective randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing these treatments have not yet been reported. This analysis evaluated the relative efficacy and safety of NIVO+IPI versus DAB+TRAM, ENCO+BINI, and VEM+COBI in patients with BRAF-mutant advanced melanoma using a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC).
PATIENTS AND METHODS
A systematic literature review identified RCTs for DAB+TRAM, ENCO+BINI, and VEM+COBI in patients with BRAF-mutant advanced melanoma. Individual patient-level data for NIVO+IPI were derived from the phase III CheckMate 067 trial (BRAF-mutant cohort) and restricted to match the inclusion/exclusion criteria of the comparator trials. Treatment effects for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards and time-varying hazard ratio (HR) models. Safety outcomes (grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events) with NIVO+IPI and the comparators were compared.
RESULTS
In the Cox proportional hazards analysis, NIVO+IPI showed improved OS compared with DAB+TRAM (HR = 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39-0.73), ENCO+BINI (HR = 0.60; CI, 0.42-0.85), and VEM+COBI (HR = 0.50; CI, 0.36-0.70) for the overall study period. In the time-varying analysis, NIVO+IPI was associated with significant improvements in OS and PFS compared with the BRAF/MEK inhibitors 12 months after treatment initiation. There were no significant differences between NIVO+IPI and BRAF/MEK inhibitor treatment from 0 to 12 months. Safety outcomes favored DAB+TRAM over NIVO+IPI, whereas NIVO+IPI was comparable to VEM+COBI.
CONCLUSION
Results of this MAIC demonstrated durable OS and PFS benefits for patients with BRAF-mutant advanced melanoma treated with NIVO+IPI compared with BRAF/MEK inhibitors, with the greatest benefits noted after 12 months.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Humans; Ipilimumab; Melanoma; Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases; Nivolumab; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf
PubMed: 33556898
DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100050 -
Gynecologic Oncology Nov 2021To determine the clinical benefit of monotherapy with PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors in patients diagnosed with advanced or recurrent ovarian cancer and to investigate the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To determine the clinical benefit of monotherapy with PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors in patients diagnosed with advanced or recurrent ovarian cancer and to investigate the predictive value of current PI3K/AKT/mTOR biomarkers on therapy response.
METHODS
A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library for articles reporting on treatment with PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors in ovarian cancer. The primary endpoint was defined as the clinical benefit rate (CBR), including the proportion of patients with complete (CR) and partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD). Secondary endpoints included the overall response rate (ORR, including CR and PR) and drug-related grade 3 and 4 adverse events.
RESULTS
We included 233 patients from 19 studies and observed a pooled CBR of 32% (95% CI 20-44%) and ORR of 3% (95% CI 0-6%) in advanced or recurrent ovarian cancer patients treated with PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors. Subgroup analysis tended to favor the studies who selected patients based on current PI3K/AKT/mTOR biomarker criteria (e.g. genomic alterations or loss of PTEN protein expression), but the difference in CBR was not statistically significant from studies with unselected populations (respectively, CBR of 42% (95% CI 23-62%) and 27% (95% CI 14-42%), P = 0.217). To better reflect true patient benefit, we excluded SD <6 months as a beneficial outcome which resulted in a pooled CBR of 7% (95% CI 2-13%). The overall proportion of patients with drug-related grade 3 and 4 adverse events was 36%.
CONCLUSIONS
The efficacy of monotherapy with PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors in advanced recurrent ovarian cancer patients is limited to a small subgroup and selection of patients with the use of current biomarkers did not improved the CBR significantly. Given the toxicity profile, we suggest that current treatment with PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors should not be initiated unless in clinical trials. Furthermore, improved biomarkers to measure functional PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway activity are needed to optimize patient selection.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Biomarkers, Tumor; Clinical Decision-Making; Female; Humans; MTOR Inhibitors; Neoplasm Staging; Ovarian Neoplasms; Patient Selection; Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases; Phosphoinositide-3 Kinase Inhibitors; Predictive Value of Tests; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt; Signal Transduction; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34253390
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.07.008 -
Journal of Health Economics and... 2020Until now, no meta-analysis has been published to evaluate the diagnostic performance of next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel using circulating tumor (ctDNA) in...
Diagnostic Accuracy of Next Generation Sequencing Panel using Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES
Until now, no meta-analysis has been published to evaluate the diagnostic performance of next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel using circulating tumor (ctDNA) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). The aim of the study was to carry out a systematic review and a meta-analysis in order to determine the accuracy of NGS of ctDNA to detect six oncogenic driver alterations: epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR); anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK); ROS proto-oncogene 1, receptor tyrosine kinase (ROS-1); serine/threonine-protein kinase B-RAF (BRAF); RET proto-oncogene (RET); and MET proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase (MET) exon 14 in patients with aNSCLC.
METHODS
MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), and Centre for Reviews and Dissemination databases and articles obtained from other sources were searched for relevant studies that evaluate the accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of NGS using ctDNA in patients with aNSCLC. The studies were eligible when NGS of ctDNA was compared with tissue tests to detect at least one of the six oncogenic driver alterations. Diagnostic measures (sensitivity and specificity) were pooled with a bivariate diagnostic random effect. All statistical analyses were performed with software R, v.4.0.0.
RESULTS
Ten studies were eligible for data extraction. The overall pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity were 0.766 (95% CI: 0.678-0.835); 0.999 (95% CI: 0.990-1.000), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
The analysis has demonstrated that the NGS panel using ctDNA has a high accuracy to identify the six actionable oncogenic driver alterations in patients with aNSCLC. Therefore, it can be considered a reliable alternative to guide the patients with aNSCLC to the right treatment who cannot undergo an invasive procedure or have insufficient tissue material for molecular tests.
PubMed: 33043062
DOI: 10.36469/jheor.2020.17088 -
Journal of Comparative Effectiveness... Mar 2021The objective was to systematically review the literature and assess the relative efficacy of agents approved in first-line settings via network meta-analysis. A... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The objective was to systematically review the literature and assess the relative efficacy of agents approved in first-line settings via network meta-analysis. A literature review was conducted via searching different medical databases. The eligibility criteria included Phase II or III randomized controlled trials that had enrolled treatment-naive adult patients with advanced/metastatic melanoma. The network meta-analysis results suggested that dabrafenib + trametinib significantly prolongs the survival outcomes compared with the monotherapies and had comparable efficacy profile compared with encorafenib + binimetinib and cobimetinib + vemurafenib. In comparison with immunotherapies, the results varied for progression-free survival and overall survival. Long-term survival data of dabrafenib + trametinib establishes the combination as one of the preferred treatment options for previously untreated melanoma patients.
Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Disease-Free Survival; Humans; Imidazoles; Melanoma; Oximes; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Pyridones; Pyrimidinones
PubMed: 33448878
DOI: 10.2217/cer-2020-0249 -
BioMed Research International 2021Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is defined as the acute onset of noncardiogenic edema and subsequent gas-exchange impairment due to a severe inflammatory... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is defined as the acute onset of noncardiogenic edema and subsequent gas-exchange impairment due to a severe inflammatory process known as cytokine storm. Xuebijing injection (hereinafter referred to as Xuebijing) is a patent drug that was used to treat ARDS or severe pneumonia (SP) in China. However, its efficacy and mechanism of actions remain unclear. In this study, we used meta-analysis and network pharmacology to assess these traits of Xuebijing.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated Xuebijing therapy for ARDS or SP. The outcomes were total mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) stay time, and TNF- and IL-6 levels. We performed a meta-analysis using RevMan 5.3 software. The putative targets, top 10 proteins, and possible pathway of Xuebinjing on ARDS were analyzed by network pharmacology. TNF- and IL-6 were further docked with the six main active components of Xuebinjing using AutoDock 4.2.6 and PyMol 1.5.0.3 software.
RESULTS
Fifteen RCTs involving 2778 patients (13 ARDS and 2 SP) were included. Compared with the control, Xuebijing treatment significantly reduced the mortality rate (risk ratio, 0.64 (95% credible interval (CrI), 0.54-0.77)), reduced the ICU stay time (mean difference (MD), -4.51 (95% CrI, -4.97--4.06)), reduced the TNF- ((MD), -1.23 (95% CrI, -1.38--1.08)) and IL-6 ((MD), -1.15 (95% CrI, -1.52--0.78)) levels. The 56 putative targets, top 10 proteins (MAPK1 (mitogen-activated protein kinase 1), MAPK8 (mitogen-activated protein kinase 8), RELA (transcription factor p65), NFKB1 (nuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunit), JUN (transcription factor AP-1), SRC (proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase), TNF (tumor necrosis factor), HRAS (GTPase HRas), IL6 (interleukin-6), and APP (amyloid-beta A4 protein)), and possible pathways (Ret tyrosine kinase, IL2-mediated signaling events, CD4+/CD8+ T cell-related TCR signaling, p75(NTR)-mediated signaling, CXCR4-mediated signaling events, LPA receptor-mediated events, IL12-mediated signaling events, FAS (CD95) signaling pathway, and immune system) of Xuebinjing's action on ARDS were obtained. The molecular docking results showed that all the six components of Xuebinjing docked with TNF-, and two components docked with IL-6 got the binding energies lower than -5.
CONCLUSION
Our results recommended Xuebijing treatment for patients with ARDS. Xuebijing has therapeutic effects on ARDS patients partly by regulating the immune cell/cytokine pathways and thus inhibiting the cytokine storm. TNF- is the cytokine both directly and indirectly inhibited by Xuebijing, and IL-6 is the cytokine mainly indirectly inhibited by Xuebijing.
Topics: Drugs, Chinese Herbal; Gene Expression Regulation; Humans; Intensive Care Units; Proto-Oncogene Mas; Respiratory Distress Syndrome; Signal Transduction
PubMed: 34124260
DOI: 10.1155/2021/8824059 -
Medicine Dec 2021Testing of B-Raf proto-oncogene (BRAF) mutation in tumor is necessary before targeted therapies are given. When tumor samples are not available, plasma samples are... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Testing of B-Raf proto-oncogene (BRAF) mutation in tumor is necessary before targeted therapies are given. When tumor samples are not available, plasma samples are commonly used for the testing of BRAF mutation. The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of BRAF mutation testing using plasma sample of cancer patients.
METHODS
Databases of Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for eligible studies investigating BRAF mutation in paired tissue and plasma samples of cancer patients. A total of 798 publications were identified after database searching. After removing 229 duplicated publications, 569 studies were screened using the following exclusion criteria: (1) BRAF mutation not measured in plasma or in tumor sample; (2) lacking BRAF-wildtype or BRAF-mutated samples; (3) tissue and plasma samples not paired; (4) lacking tumor or plasma samples; (5) not plasma sample; (6) not cancer; (7) un-interpretable data. Accuracy data and relevant information were extracted from each eligible study by 2 independent researchers and analyzed using statistical software.
RESULTS
After pooling the accuracy data from 3943 patients of the 53 eligible studies, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio of BRAF mutation testing using plasma sample were 69%, 98%, and 55.78, respectively. Area under curve of summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.9435. Subgroup analysis indicated that BRAF mutation testing using plasma had overall higher accuracy (diagnostic odds ratio of 89.17) in colorectal cancer, compared to melanoma and thyroid carcinoma. In addition, next-generation sequencing had an overall higher accuracy in detecting BRAF mutation using plasma sample (diagnostic odds ratio of 63.90), compared to digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and conventional PCR, while digital PCR showed the highest sensitivity (74%) among the 3 techniques.
CONCLUSION
BRAF testing using plasma sample showed an overall high accuracy compared to paired tumor tissue sample, which could be used for cancer genotyping when tissue sample is not available. Large prospective studies are needed to further investigate the accuracy of BRAF mutation testing in plasma sample.
Topics: DNA Mutational Analysis; Humans; Mutation; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity
PubMed: 34941166
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028382 -
JAMA Network Open Jul 2021Although BCR-ABL fusion oncoprotein tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BCR-ABL TKIs) can substantially improve the survival rate of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), they are... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Comparison of Hepatotoxicity Associated With New BCR-ABL Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors vs Imatinib Among Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
IMPORTANCE
Although BCR-ABL fusion oncoprotein tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BCR-ABL TKIs) can substantially improve the survival rate of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), they are clinically accompanied by severe hepatotoxicity.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the relative risk (RR) of hepatotoxicity of new-generation BCR-ABL TKIs with that of imatinib, and to provide an overall assessment of the clinical benefit.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library databases, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for clinical trials published between January 2000 and April 2020.
STUDY SELECTION
Study selection was conducted independently by 2 investigators according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria published previously in the protocol: only randomized phase 2 or phase 3 clinical trials that compared bosutinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, or ponatinib with imatinib were included. Among the 2666 records identified, 9 studies finally fulfilled the established criteria.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Two investigators extracted study characteristics and data independently using a standardized data extraction form. Data were extracted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines. When substantial heterogeneity was observed, pooled estimates were calculated based on the random-effect model; otherwise, the fixed-effect model was used.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Data extracted included study characteristics, baseline patient information, interventions and data on all-grade and high-grade (grades 3 and 4) elevation of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels, overall survival, and major molecular response (MMR). The RRs and 95% CIs were calculated using the inverse variance method.
RESULTS
Nine trials involving 3475 patients were analyzed; the median (range) age was 49 (18-91) years; 2059 (59.2%) were male patients. Increased risks were observed for each new-generation TKI except for dasatinib. Patients receiving new-generation TKIs were more likely to experience all grades of ALT elevation (pooled RR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.78-4.69; P < .001) and grades 3 and 4 ALT elevation (pooled RR, 4.36; 95% CI, 2.00-9.50; P < .001) compared with those receiving imatinib. Patients receiving new-generation TKIs were also more likely to experience all grades of AST elevation (pooled RR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.63-2.98; P < .001) and grades 3 and 4 AST elevation (pooled RR, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.59-4.42; P < .001) compared with those receiving imatinib. New-generation TKIs were associated with a significantly higher rate of MMR at 1 year compared with imatinib (pooled RR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.44-1.75; P < .001). No statistical difference in overall survival at 1 year was found between new-generation TKIs and imatinib (pooled RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 1.00-1.01; P = .33).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
When compared to imatinib, bosutinib, nilotinib, and ponatinib had higher relative risks of hepatotoxicity. Treatment with new-generation TKIs was associated with a higher MMR rate at 1 year but not with 1-year overall survival.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Alanine Transaminase; Aniline Compounds; Aspartate Aminotransferases; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Dasatinib; Female; Humans; Imatinib Mesylate; Imidazoles; Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive; Male; Middle Aged; Nitriles; Oncogene Proteins v-abl; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcr; Pyridazines; Pyrimidines; Quinolines; Risk; Young Adult
PubMed: 34292334
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.20165 -
Medicine Jun 2020The global morbidity of cancer is rising rapidly. Despite advances in molecular biology, immunology, and cytotoxic and immune-anticancer therapies, cancer remains a...
BACKGROUND
The global morbidity of cancer is rising rapidly. Despite advances in molecular biology, immunology, and cytotoxic and immune-anticancer therapies, cancer remains a major cause of death worldwide. Protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 12 (PTPN12) is a new member of the cytoplasmic protein tyrosine phosphatase family, isolated from a cDNA library of adult colon tissue. Thus far, no studies have reviewed the correlation between PTPN12 gene expression and human tumors.
METHODS
This article summarizes the latest domestic and international research developments on how the expression of PTPN12 relates to human tumors. The extensive search in Web of Science and PubMed with the keywords including PTPN12, tumor, renal cell carcinoma, proto-oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes was undertaken.
RESULTS
More and more studies have shown that a tumor is essentially a genetic disease, arising from a broken antagonistic function between proto-oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. When their antagonistic effect is out of balance, it may cause uncontrolled growth of cells and lead to the occurrence of tumors. PTPN12 is a tumor suppressor gene, so inhibiting its activity will lead directly or indirectly to the occurrence of tumors.
CONCLUSION
The etiology, prevention, and treatment of tumors have become the focus of research around the world. PTPN12 is a tumor suppressor gene. In the future, PTPN12 might serve as a novel molecular marker to benefit patients, and even the development of tumor suppressor gene activation agents can form a practical research direction.
Topics: Genes, Tumor Suppressor; Humans; Neoplasms; Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase, Non-Receptor Type 12
PubMed: 32541467
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020445 -
British Journal of Cancer Mar 2020MYCN amplification (MNA) is the strongest indicator of poor prognosis in neuroblastoma (NB). This meta-analysis aims to determine the diagnostic accuracy of MNA analysis... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
MYCN amplification (MNA) is the strongest indicator of poor prognosis in neuroblastoma (NB). This meta-analysis aims to determine the diagnostic accuracy of MNA analysis in circulating-free DNA (cfDNA) from advanced-stage NB patients.
METHODS
A systematic review of electronic databases was conducted to identify studies exploring the detection of MNA in plasma/serum cfDNA from NB patients at diagnosis using PCR methodology. Pooled estimates for sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated by conducting a bivariate/HSROC random-effects meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Seven studies, with a total of 529 advanced-stage patients, were eligible. The pooled sensitivity of cfDNA-based MNA analysis was 0.908 (95% CI, 0.818-0.956), the pooled specificity was 0.976 (0.940-0.991) and the DOR was 410.0 (-103.6 to 923.7). Sub-grouped by INSS stage, the sensitivity for stage 3 and 4 patients was 0.832 (0.677-0.921) and 0.930 (0.834-0.972), respectively. The specificity was 0.999 (0.109-1.000) and 0.974 (0.937-0.990), respectively, and the DOR was 7855.2 (-66267.0 to 81977.4) and 508.7 (-85.8 to 1103.2), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
MNA analysis in cfDNA using PCR methodology represents a non-invasive approach to rapidly and accurately determine MNA status in patients with advanced-stage NB. Standardised methodology must be developed before this diagnostic test can enter the clinic.
Topics: Cell-Free Nucleic Acids; Gene Amplification; Humans; N-Myc Proto-Oncogene Protein; Neoplasm Staging; Neuroblastoma
PubMed: 32015512
DOI: 10.1038/s41416-020-0740-y -
Scientific Reports Oct 2023Molecular biomarkers have the potential to predict the recurrence risk of early-stage lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) after complete resection, but the study results are... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Molecular biomarkers have the potential to predict the recurrence risk of early-stage lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) after complete resection, but the study results are controversial. We aimed to clarify the association of molecular alterations with disease-free survival (DFS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in early-stage LUAD with R0 resection. Comprehensive searches were conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for this systematic review and meta-analysis with date restrictions from 2012 to 2022. In the 18 included studies, data from a total of 7417 participants in 11 studies and 4167 participants in 9 studies were collected for the EGFR and KRAS meta-analyses, respectively. Two studies were assessed as having a moderate risk of bias, and the others were all assessed as having a high individual risk of bias. The molecular alterations in KRAS rather than EGFR, were associated with a high risk of recurrence for early-stage LUAD patients suffering from R0 resection, especially for those in pStage I, the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) of KRAS were 2.71 (95% CI, 1.81-4.06; I = 22%; P < 0.00001) and 1.95 (95% CI, 1.25-3.20; I = 57%; P = 0.003) with small interstudy heterogeneity in univariate and multivariate analyses, respectively. This finding suggests that molecular alterations in KRAS that could be detected by polymerase chain reaction techniques would provide new insight into stratifying risk and personalizing patient postoperative follow-up.
Topics: Humans; Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras); Adenocarcinoma of Lung; Prognosis; Lung Neoplasms; ErbB Receptors
PubMed: 37907475
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-42851-2