-
World Journal of Urology Dec 2022The optimal treatment for clinical stage (CS) IIA/IIB seminomas is still controversial. We evaluated current treatment options.
PURPOSE
The optimal treatment for clinical stage (CS) IIA/IIB seminomas is still controversial. We evaluated current treatment options.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed. Only randomized clinical trials and comparative studies published from January 2010 until February 2021 were included. Search items included: seminoma, CS IIA, CS IIB and therapy. Outcome parameters were relapse rate (RR), relapse-free (RFS), overall and cancer-specific survival (OS, CSS). Additionally, acute and long-term side effects including secondary malignancies (SMs) were analyzed.
RESULTS
Seven comparative studies (one prospective and six retrospective) were identified with a total of 5049 patients (CS IIA: 2840, CS IIB: 2209). The applied treatment modalities were radiotherapy (RT) (n = 3049; CS IIA: 1888, CSIIB: 1006, unknown: 155) and chemotherapy (CT) or no RT (n = 2000; CS IIA: 797, CS IIB: 1074, unknown: 129). In CS IIA, RRs ranged from 0% to 4.8% for RT and 0% for CT. Concerning CS IIB RRs of 9.5%-21.1% for RT and of 0%-14.2% for CT have been reported. 5-year OS ranged from 90 to 100%. Only two studies reported on treatment-related toxicities.
CONCLUSIONS
RT and CT are the most commonly applied treatments in CS IIA/B seminoma. In CS IIA seminomas, RRs after RT and CT are similar. However, in CS IIB, CT seems to be more effective. Survival rates of CS IIA/B seminomas are excellent. Consequently, long-term toxicities and SMs are important survivorship issues. Alternative treatment approaches, e.g., retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) or dose-reduced sequential CT/RT are currently under prospective investigation.
Topics: Male; Humans; Seminoma; Retrospective Studies; Prospective Studies; Neoplasm Staging; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Testicular Neoplasms; Neoplasms, Second Primary
PubMed: 34779882
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03873-5 -
International Journal of Surgery... May 2023The effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) under different routes for the treatment of large pheochromocytomas (PCCs) is unknown. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) under different routes for the treatment of large pheochromocytomas (PCCs) is unknown.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This meta-analysis and systematic review was performed according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) and AMSTAR (Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews) Guidelines. Three databases were systematically searched, including Medline, PubMed, and Web of Science. The time frame of the search was set from the creation of the database to October 2022. Perioperative outcomes were divided into two groups according to tumor size: SMALL group (≤6 cm in diameter), LARGE group (>6 cm in diameter).
RESULTS
Eight studies including 600 patients were included. In the LA group, complications was comparable in both groups (SMALL group and LARGE group), and the LARGE group had longer operative time [OT weighted mean difference (WMD)=32.55; 95% CI: 11.17, 53.92; P <0.01], length of stay (LOS WMD=0.82; 95% CI: 0.19, 1.44; P <0.05), more estimated blood loss (EBL WMD=85.26; 95% CI: 20.71, 149.82; P <0.05), hypertension [odds ratio (OR)=3.99; 95% CI: 1.84, 8.65; P <0.01], hypotension (OR=1.84; 95% CI: 1.11, 3.05; P <0.05), and conversion (OR=5.60; 95% CI: 1.56, 20.13; P <0.01). In the transabdominal LA group, OT, LOS, EBL, complications, hypertension, and hypotension were the same in both groups. In the retroperitoneal LA group, complications and hypotension were the same in both groups, while the LARGE group had longer OT (WMD=52.07; 95% CI: 26.95, 77.20; P <0.01), LOS (WMD=0.51; 95% CI: 0.00, 1.01; P <0.05), more EBL (WMD=92.99; 95% CI: 27.70, 158.28; P <0.01) and higher rates of hypertension (OR=6.03; 95% CI: 1.95, 18.61; P <0.01).
CONCLUSIONS
LA remains a safe and effective approach for large PCC. Transabdominal LA is superior to retroperitoneal LA.
Topics: Humans; Laparoscopy; Adrenalectomy; Pheochromocytoma; Adrenal Gland Neoplasms; Hypertension; Hypotension; Treatment Outcome; Length of Stay
PubMed: 37037515
DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000389 -
Cancer Treatment Reviews Jan 2024In primary localised resectable retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS), loco-regional and distant relapse occur frequently despite optimal surgical management. The role of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
A systematic review of the role of chemotherapy in retroperitoneal sarcoma by the Australia and New Zealand sarcoma association clinical practice guidelines working party.
BACKGROUND
In primary localised resectable retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS), loco-regional and distant relapse occur frequently despite optimal surgical management. The role of chemotherapy in improving outcomes is unclear.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted, using the population, intervention, comparison outcome (PICO) model, to evaluate whether neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy improve outcomes in adults with primary localised resectable RPS. Medline, Embase and Cochrane Central were queried for publications from 1946 to June 2022 that evaluated recurrence free survival, overall survival, and post operative complications. Each study was screened by two independent reviewers for suitability. A qualitative synthesis of the results was performed.
RESULTS
Twenty three studies were identified; one meta-analysis of retrospective studies and 22 retrospective studies including three with propensity matched cohorts. Most studies did not analyse outcomes by histology, detail treatment regimens, provide baseline characteristics or selection criteria for those receiving chemotherapy. Evidence of selection bias was illustrated in several studies. Newcastle-Ottawa quality of retrospective cohort studies was good for 12 studies and poor for 10 studies. All studies were assessed as Level III-2 evidence by the Australian NHMRC hierarchy. Overall, the addition of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy to surgery was not associated with improvement in local recurrence, metastasis free survival, disease free survival or overall survival in primary localised resectable RPS. There is some evidence of an association of chemotherapy with worse overall survival. One single centre study showed that neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with increased post operative complications compared to surgery alone in primary localised resectable RPS.
CONCLUSIONS
There is currently no evidence that demonstrates the addition of chemotherapy to surgery improves outcomes in adult patients with primary localised resectable RPS. Available evidence is limited by its retrospective nature and high likelihood of selection bias with chemotherapy generally administered to patients at higher risk of recurrence and many patients not receiving care in high volume sarcoma centres. Randomised trials are required to conclusively determine the role of chemotherapy in primary localised resectable RPS.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Retrospective Studies; New Zealand; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Australia; Sarcoma; Retroperitoneal Neoplasms
PubMed: 38039565
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102663 -
International Journal of Surgery... Apr 2023Comparison of the perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (L-RPLND) and open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (O-RPLND) for... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Comparison of the perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic and open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for low-stage (stage I/II) testicular germ cell tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVE
Comparison of the perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (L-RPLND) and open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (O-RPLND) for low-stage (stage I/II) testicular germ cell tumors.
METHODS
The authors performed a systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis of the primary outcomes of interest according to PRISMA criteria, and the quality assessment of the included studies followed the AMSTAR guidelines. Four databases were searched, including Embase, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The search period was from the creation of each database to October 2022. The statistical analysis software uses Stata17.
RESULTS
There were nine studies involving 579 patients. Compared with O-RPLND, L-RPLND was associated with shorter length of stay [weighted mean difference (WMD)=-3.99, 95% CI: -4.80 to -3.19, P <0.05], less estimated blood loss (WMD=-0.95, 95% CI: -1.35 to -0.54, P <0.05), shorter time to oral intake after surgery (WMD=-0.77, 95% CI: -1.50 to -0.03, P <0.05), and lower overall complications (odds ratio=0.58, 95% CI: 0.38-0.87, P <0.05). Subgroup analysis found that the complication rate of Clavien-Dindo grade II was lower in L-RPLND (odds ratio=0.24, 95% CI: 0.11-0.55, P <0.05). Interestingly, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of operation time, lymph node yields, and recurrence rate during follow-up.
CONCLUSION
L-RPLND is superior to O-RPLND and is worthy of clinical promotion.
Topics: Male; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Lymph Node Excision; Testicular Neoplasms; Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal; Laparoscopy; Retroperitoneal Space; Neoplasm Staging; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36917132
DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000321 -
Clinical Colorectal Cancer Jun 2024A survey of medical oncologists (MOs), radiation oncologists (ROs), and surgical oncologists (SOs) who are experts in the management of patients with metastatic...
BACKGROUND
A survey of medical oncologists (MOs), radiation oncologists (ROs), and surgical oncologists (SOs) who are experts in the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) was conducted to identify factors used to consider metastasis-directed therapy (MDT).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
An online survey to assess clinical factors when weighing MDT in patients with mCRC was developed based on systematic review of the literature and integrated with clinical vignettes. Supporting evidence from the systematic review was included to aid in answering questions.
RESULTS
Among 75 experts on mCRC invited, 47 (response rate 62.7%) chose to participate including 16 MOs, 16 ROs, and 15 SOs. Most experts would not consider MDT in patients with 3 lesions in both the liver and lung regardless of distribution or timing of metastatic disease diagnosis (6 vs. 36 months after definitive treatment). Similarly, for patients with retroperitoneal lymph node and lung and liver involvement, most experts would not offer MDT regardless of timing of metastatic disease diagnosis. In general, SOs were willing to consider MDT in patients with more advanced disease, ROs were more willing to offer treatment regardless of metastatic site location, and MOs were the least likely to consider MDT.
CONCLUSIONS
Among experts caring for patients with mCRC, significant variation was noted among MOs, ROs, and SOs in the distribution and volume of metastatic disease for which MDT would be considered. This variability highlights differing opinions on management of these patients and underscores the need for well-designed prospective randomized trials to characterize the risks and potential benefits of MDT.
Topics: Humans; Colorectal Neoplasms; Surveys and Questionnaires; Oncologists; Liver Neoplasms; Neoplasm Metastasis; Male; Female; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Lung Neoplasms; Radiation Oncologists; Clinical Decision-Making; Middle Aged
PubMed: 38365567
DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2024.01.004 -
Radiology and Oncology Feb 2020Background There is no clear evidence on whether radiotherapy (RT) improves treatment result in patients with retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS). Methods A systematic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Background There is no clear evidence on whether radiotherapy (RT) improves treatment result in patients with retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS). Methods A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Scopus and CENTRAL databases. Data were retrieved from published comparatives studies in patients with RPS undergoing surgery alone or RT plus surgery. The primary endpoints were the 5-year OS and the median OS. The secondary endpoints were the recurrence-free survival (RFS) and the R0-resection rate. Continuous outcomes were calculated by means of weighted mean difference (WMD). Results Ten out of 374 articles were analyzed. The median OS and the 5-year survival were significantly increased in patients treated with RT and surgery, compared to patients treated with surgery alone (p < 0.00001, p < 0.001). Median RFS was significantly increased in patients treated with either preoperative (p < 0.001) or postoperative (p = 0.001) RT compared to patients that underwent surgery alone. Finally, median R0-resection rate was similar between the two groups (p = 0.56). Conclusion RT along with radical surgery could be the standard of care in at least a subgroup of patients with RPS.
Topics: Combined Modality Therapy; Disease-Free Survival; Humans; Margins of Excision; Publication Bias; Retroperitoneal Neoplasms; Sarcoma; Time Factors
PubMed: 32114526
DOI: 10.2478/raon-2020-0012 -
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery May 2023No randomised clinical trials (RCTs) have simultaneously compared the safety of open (OA), transperitoneal laparoscopic (TLA), posterior retroperitoneal (PRA), and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
No randomised clinical trials (RCTs) have simultaneously compared the safety of open (OA), transperitoneal laparoscopic (TLA), posterior retroperitoneal (PRA), and robotic adrenalectomy (RA) for resecting adrenal tumours.
AIM
To evaluate outcomes for OA, TLA, PRA, and RA from RCTs.
METHODS
A NMA was performed according to PRISMA-NMA guidelines. Analysis was performed using R packages and Shiny.
RESULTS
Eight RCTs with 488 patients were included (mean age: 48.9 years). Overall, 44.5% of patients underwent TLA (217/488), 37.3% underwent PRA (182/488), 16.4% underwent RA (80/488), and just 1.8% patients underwent OA (9/488). The mean tumour size was 35 mm in largest diameter with mean sizes of 44.3 mm for RA, 40.9 mm for OA, 35.5 mm for TLA, and 34.4 mm for PRA (P < 0.001). TLA had the lowest blood loss (mean: 50.6 ml), complication rates (12.4%, 14/113), and conversion to open rates (1.3%, 2/157), while PRA had the shortest intra-operative duration (mean: 94 min), length of hospital stay (mean: 3.7 days), lowest visual analogue scale pain scores post-operatively (mean: 3.7), and was most cost-effective (mean: 1728 euros per case). At NMA, there was a significant increase in blood loss for OA (mean difference (MD): 117.00 ml (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.41-230.00)) with similar blood loss observed for PRA (MD: - 10.50 (95% CI: - 83.40-65.90)) compared to TLA.
CONCLUSION
LTA and PRA are important contemporary options in achieving favourable outcomes following adrenalectomy. The next generation of RCTs may be more insightful for comparison surgical outcomes following RA, as this approach is likely to play a future role in minimally invasive adrenalectomy.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION
CRD42022301005.
Topics: Humans; Middle Aged; Adrenal Gland Neoplasms; Adrenalectomy; Laparoscopy; Length of Stay; Network Meta-Analysis; Retroperitoneal Space; Treatment Outcome; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 37145303
DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02911-7 -
World Journal of Surgical Oncology Jan 2023In patients with colorectal cancer and clinically suspected para-aortic lymph node metastasis, the survival benefit of para-aortic lymphadenectomy is unknown. We... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
In patients with colorectal cancer and clinically suspected para-aortic lymph node metastasis, the survival benefit of para-aortic lymphadenectomy is unknown. We conducted a meta-analysis and systematic review to investigate it.
METHODS
PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE were searched until January 2000 to April 2022 to identify studies reporting overall survivals, complication rates, and hazard ratios of prognostic factors in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing para-aortic lymphadenectomy, and those data were pooled.
RESULTS
Twenty retrospective studies (1021 patients undergoing para-aortic lymphadenectomy) met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis indicates that participants undergoing para-aortic lymphadenectomy were associated with 5-year survival benefit, compared to those not receiving para-aortic lymphadenectomy (odds ratio = 3.73, 95% confidence interval: 2.05-6.78), but there was no significant difference in complication rate (odds ratio = 0.97, 95% confidence interval: 0.46-2.08). Further analysis of para-aortic lymphadenectomy group showed that 5-year survival of the positive group with pathologically para-aortic lymph node metastasis was lower than that of the negative group (odds ratio = 0.19, 95% confidence interval: 0.11-0.31). Moreover, complete resection (odds ratio = 5.26, 95% confidence interval: 2.02-13.69), para-aortic lymph node metastasis (≤4) (hazard ratio = 1.88, 95% confidence interval: 0.97-3.62), and medium-high differentiation (hazard ratio = 2.98, 95% confidence interval: 1.48-5.99) were protective factors for survival. Preoperative extra-retroperitoneal metastasis was associated with poorer relapse-free survival (hazard ratio = 1.85, 95% confidence interval: 1.10-3.10).
CONCLUSION
Para-aortic lymphadenectomy had promising clinical efficacy in prolonging survival rather than complication rate in patients with colorectal cancer and clinically diagnostic para-aortic lymph node metastasis. Further prospective studies should be performed.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
PROSPERO: CRD42022379276.
Topics: Humans; Colorectal Neoplasms; Lymph Node Excision; Lymphatic Metastasis; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 36721235
DOI: 10.1186/s12957-023-02908-y -
Cancer Control : Journal of the Moffitt... 2021There is currently no consensus on optimal management of patients with primary or recurrent non-resectable/residual retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS). The objective of this...
BACKGROUND
There is currently no consensus on optimal management of patients with primary or recurrent non-resectable/residual retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS). The objective of this study was to document the outcomes of patients with primary or recurrent non-resectable/residual RPS treated in our center with definitive radiotherapy (RT) and to perform a systematic review on the topic.
METHODS
A retrospective analysis of consecutive RPS patients treated in our center between 2000 and 2019 was performed. All consecutive patients who underwent definitive conformal RT with image guidance for primary or recurrent non-resectable or macroscopically residual RPS were included. Additionally, a systematic review compliant with the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses was performed.
RESULTS
The study enrolled 14 patients who met the aforementioned criteria. Data on clinicopathological characteristics, RT and response to treatment were assessed. RT allowed achieving prolonged local control of the disease, i.e. no local progression of the disease for more than 12 months after RT in 10 patients. Local control lasted more than 24 months in 6 cases, with minimal or no toxicity. A systemic review of 11 studies revealed concordance of our results with previous reports of primary or recurrent non-resectable/residual RPS.
CONCLUSIONS
RT provided satisfactory local disease control with acceptable treatment tolerance in patients with primary or recurrent non-resectable/residual RPS and represents a valuable treatment modality in the selected group of patients. Additional RT modalities i.e. BT, particle therapy, MRI-guided RT, or GRID/Lattice RT may be introduced to improve local control and further minimize toxicity.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Cohort Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neoplasm, Residual; Radiotherapy Dosage; Radiotherapy, Image-Guided; Retroperitoneal Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Sarcoma; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33567904
DOI: 10.1177/1073274820983028 -
European Urology Focus May 2023Guidelines recommend primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) as a treatment option for tumour marker-negative stage II nonseminomatous germ cell tumour... (Review)
Review
CONTEXT
Guidelines recommend primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) as a treatment option for tumour marker-negative stage II nonseminomatous germ cell tumour (NSGCT).
OBJECTIVE
To review the literature on oncological outcomes for men with stage II NSGCT treated with RPLND.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
A systematic review of studies describing clinicopathological outcomes following primary RPLND in stage II NSGCT was conducted in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) statement. Baseline data, perioperative and postoperative parameters, and oncological outcomes were collected.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
In total, 12 of 4387 studies were included, from which we collected data for 835 men. Among men with clinical stage II NSGCT, pathological stage II was confirmed in 615 of 790 patients (78%). Most studies administered adjuvant chemotherapy in cases with large lymph nodes, multiple affected lymph nodes, or persistently elevated tumour markers. Recurrence was observed in 12-40% of patients without adjuvant chemotherapy and 0-4% of patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy.
CONCLUSIONS
The literature describing RPLND in clinical stage II NSGCT is heterogeneous and no meta-analysis was possible, but RPLND can provide accurate staging and may be curative in selected patients.
PATIENT SUMMARY
We reviewed the literature to summarise results after surgical removal of enlarged lymph nodes in the back of the abdomen in men with testis cancer. This procedure provides accurate information on how far the cancer has spread and may provide a cure in selected patients.
Topics: Humans; Male; Lymph Node Excision; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Neoplasm Staging; Testicular Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36379869
DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.11.003