-
PloS One 2020Existing systematic reviews of Rh immunoprophylaxis include only data from randomized controlled trials, have dated searches, and some do not report on all domains of...
BACKGROUND
Existing systematic reviews of Rh immunoprophylaxis include only data from randomized controlled trials, have dated searches, and some do not report on all domains of risk of bias or evaluate the certainty of the evidence. Our objective was to perform an updated review, by including new trials, any comparative observational studies, and assessing the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE framework.
METHODS
We searched MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library from 2000 to November 26, 2019. Relevant websites and bibliographies of systematic reviews and guidelines were searched for studies published before 2000. Outcomes of interest were sensitization and adverse events. Risk of bias was evaluated with the Cochrane tool and ROBINS-I. The certainty of the evidence was performed using the GRADE framework.
RESULTS
Thirteen randomized trials and eight comparative cohort studies were identified, evaluating 12 comparisons. Although there is some evidence of beneficial treatment effects (e.g., at 6-months postpartum, fewer women who received RhIg at delivery compared to no RhIg became sensitized [70 fewer sensitized women per 1,000 (95%CI: 67 to 71 fewer); I2 = 73%]), due to very low certainty of the evidence, the magnitude of the treatment effect may be overestimated. The certainty of the evidence was very low for most outcomes often due to high risk of bias (e.g., randomization method, allocation concealment, selective reporting) and imprecision (i.e., few events and small sample sizes). There is limited evidence on prophylaxis for invasive fetal procedures (e.g. amniocentesis) in the comparative literature, and few studies reported adverse events.
CONCLUSION
Serious risk of bias and low to very low certainty of the evidence is found in existing RCTs and comparative observational studies addressing optimal effectiveness of Rh immunoprophylaxis. Guideline development committees should exercise caution when assessing the strength of the recommendations that inform and influence clinical practice in this area.
Topics: Female; GRADE Approach; Humans; Immunologic Factors; Postnatal Care; Pregnancy; Prenatal Care; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rh Isoimmunization; Rh-Hr Blood-Group System
PubMed: 32913362
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238844 -
Transplant Immunology Dec 2023Kidney transplantation is considered an ideal treatment for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) because it provides a longer and better quality of life than dialysis.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Kidney transplantation is considered an ideal treatment for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) because it provides a longer and better quality of life than dialysis. ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) kidney transplantation relies on two principles: (i) removal of antibodies from a blood group; and (ii) inhibition of reappearance of blood group antibodies by intensifying the induction and maintenance of immunosuppression. This systematic review aimed to analyze the success and safety of ABO-I live-donor kidney transplantation.
METHODS
Databases, including Google Scholar, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Medline were searched. Search duration was from the database establishment to December 2022. A thorough search was performed for relevant studies investigating the success and safety of ABO-I live-donor kidney transplantation. Two investigators independently extracted literature information and assessed the quality of the included studies. Heterogeneity test was performed using Cochrane's Q and chi-squared tests. All statistical analyses were performed using R software (version 4.2.1).
RESULTS
The search for relevant literature in the five electronic databases yielded 1238 articles. Of the 1238 articles, only 15 were included. Meta-analysis of outcomes from five studies showed a survival rate of 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88 to 0.97, P < 0.001) after ≥3 years, while outcomes from 12 studies revealed a short-term patient survival rate of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.92 to 0.96, P = 0.75). In contrast, long- and short-term graft survival rates were 0.89 (95% CI: 0.75 to 0.96, P < 0.001) and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.90 to 0.97, P < 0.001), respectively. Incidence rates of infectious, surgical, and medical complications were 0.31 (95% CI: 0.22 to 0.41, P < 0.001), 0.12 (95% CI: 0.05 to 0.25, P < 0.001), and 0.38 (95% CI: 0.17 to 0.66, P < 0.001), respectively.
CONCLUSION
Good long- and short-term patient outcomes and graft survival rates were observed after ABO-I kidney transplantation. Similarly, the safety of performing kidney transplantations from living donors with ABO-I blood groups was established by the results of the current meta-analysis. Therefore, ABO-I live-donor kidney transplantations should be encouraged to reduce the time recipients spend on waiting lists and supplement the existing paired-exchange donor program.
Topics: Humans; Kidney Transplantation; ABO Blood-Group System; Living Donors; Quality of Life; Renal Dialysis; Blood Group Incompatibility; Antibodies; Graft Survival; Graft Rejection
PubMed: 37648033
DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2023.101921 -
Translational Pediatrics Jun 2022Hyperbilirubinemia is the most common cause of neonatal hospitalization and, although it generally has a good prognosis, a significant percentage of neonatal patients...
BACKGROUND
Hyperbilirubinemia is the most common cause of neonatal hospitalization and, although it generally has a good prognosis, a significant percentage of neonatal patients maintain a high bilirubin level, which can lead to severe complications, including lifelong disability such as growth retardation, encephalopathy, autism and hearing impairment. The study of risk factors for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia has been controversial. Therefore, we evaluated the risk factors of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia using a meta-analysis.
METHODS
Relevant English and Chinese studies that discussed risk factors for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia were retrieved from the PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, Central, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang and China Science Digital Library (CSDL). The literature took newborns as the research object, set up a control group, and observed the relationship between exposure factors and neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. The combined effect size was expressed by odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The Chi-square test was used to test heterogeneity of the studies, and if it existed, subgroup analyses were used to explore the source of heterogeneity, and the random-effects model was selected for the combined analysis. The fixed-effects model was chosen for the combined analysis if there was no heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed using Egger's test and funnel plot.
RESULTS
Risk factors for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia were exclusive breastfeeding (BF: OR =1.74, 95% CI: 1.42, 2.12, Z=5.43, P<0.00001); glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency (G6PD: OR =1.62, 95% CI: 1.44, 1.81, Z=8.39, P<0.00001); maternal-fetal ABO blood group incompatibility (OR =1.64, 95% CI: 1.42, 1.89, Z=6.75, P<0.00001); and preterm birth (PTB: OR =1.31, 95% CI: 1.17, 1.47, Z=4.60, P<0.00001); there was no heterogeneity or publication bias among the studies (BF: χ=5.34, P=0.25, I=25%; G6PD: χ=4.40, P=0.49, I=0%; ABO: χ=1.91, P=0.75, I=0%; PTB: χ=0.81, P=0.67, I=0%).
CONCLUSIONS
Exclusive breastfeeding, G6PD deficiency, ABO incompatibility and premature birth were confirmed as risk factors for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. Pregnant women with risk factors should be monitored more closely and clinical intervention should be given in a timely manner.
PubMed: 35800274
DOI: 10.21037/tp-22-229 -
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health Jul 2022The aim of this review was to systematically review the outcome of routine anti-D administration among unsensitised rhesus (RhD)-negative individuals who have an... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
AIM
The aim of this review was to systematically review the outcome of routine anti-D administration among unsensitised rhesus (RhD)-negative individuals who have an abortion. This review is registered with Prospero.
METHODS
A search for all published and ongoing studies, without restrictions on language or publication status, was performed using the following databases from their inception: EBM Reviews Ovid - Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE Ovid (Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations and Daily), Embase.com, Popline and Google Scholar. Study types included: randomised controlled trials, controlled trials, cohort and case-control studies from 1971 onwards. The population included women who undergo an abortion (induced, incomplete, spontaneous or septic abortion), medical or surgical <12 weeks, and isoimmunisation in a subsequent pregnancy. The primary outcomes were: (1) development of a positive Kleihauer-Betke test and (2) development of Rh alloimmunisation in a subsequent pregnancy.
RESULTS
A total of 2652 studies were screened with 105 accessed for full-text review. Two studies have been included with high bias appreciated. Both studies found few women to be sensitised in forming antibodies after an abortion. The limited studies available and heterogeneity prevent the conduction of a meta-analysis.
CONCLUSIONS
Rh immunoglobulin has well-documented safety. However, it is not without risks and costs, is a possible barrier to delivering efficient services, and may have limited availability in some countries. The evidence base and quality of studies are currently limited. There is unclear benefit from the recommendation for Rh testing and immunoglobulin administration in early pregnancy. More research is needed as clinical practice guidelines are varied, based on expert opinions and moving away from testing and administration at time of abortion.
IMPLICATIONS
There is limited evidence surrounding medical benefit of Rh testing and immunoglobulin administration in early pregnancy. Further research is needed to define alloimmunisation and immunoglobulin benefit to update standards of care. Additionally, other factors should be considered in forming clinical policies and guidelines such as costs, feasibility and impact on access to care for patients.
Topics: Abortion, Induced; Abortion, Spontaneous; Cohort Studies; Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Rh Isoimmunization
PubMed: 34819315
DOI: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2021-201225 -
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Feb 2020All non-sensitized Rhesus D (RhD)-negative pregnant women in Germany receive antenatal anti-D prophylaxis without knowledge of fetal RhD status. Non-invasive prenatal...
BACKGROUND
All non-sensitized Rhesus D (RhD)-negative pregnant women in Germany receive antenatal anti-D prophylaxis without knowledge of fetal RhD status. Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) of cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma could avoid unnecessary anti-D administration. In this paper, we systematically reviewed the evidence on the benefit of NIPT for fetal RhD status in RhD-negative pregnant women.
METHODS
We systematically searched several bibliographic databases, trial registries, and other sources (up to October 2019) for controlled intervention studies investigating NIPT for fetal RhD versus conventional anti-D prophylaxis. The focus was on the impact on fetal and maternal morbidity. We primarily considered direct evidence (from randomized controlled trials) or if unavailable, linked evidence (from diagnostic accuracy studies and from controlled intervention studies investigating the administration or withholding of anti-D prophylaxis). The results of diagnostic accuracy studies were pooled in bivariate meta-analyses.
RESULTS
Neither direct evidence nor sufficient data for linked evidence were identified. Meta-analysis of data from about 60,000 participants showed high sensitivity (99.9%; 95% CI [99.5%; 100%] and specificity (99.2%; 95% CI [98.5%; 99.5%]).
CONCLUSIONS
NIPT for fetal RhD status is equivalent to conventional serologic testing using the newborn's blood. Studies investigating patient-relevant outcomes are still lacking.
Topics: Chemoprevention; Female; Fetal Blood; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Medical Overuse; Noninvasive Prenatal Testing; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Hematologic; Prenatal Care; Rh Isoimmunization; Rh-Hr Blood-Group System; Rho(D) Immune Globulin
PubMed: 32033599
DOI: 10.1186/s12884-020-2742-4 -
Journal of Perinatology : Official... Jul 2019To estimate the prevalence and characteristics of fetal thrombocytopenia at the time of percutaneous umbilical cord sampling (PUBS) in pregnancies complicated by... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To estimate the prevalence and characteristics of fetal thrombocytopenia at the time of percutaneous umbilical cord sampling (PUBS) in pregnancies complicated by alloimmunization and to conduct a systematic review on fetal thrombocytopenia in these pregnancies.
STUDY DESIGN
Retrospective cohort study of all patients undergoing PUBS at our institution from 2000-2017. Clinical data, including fetal platelet counts, were abstracted from the medical record and analyzed with routine statistical procedures. A systematic review and meta-analysis were also conducted according to standard procedures.
RESULT
At first procedure, prior to any transfusion, 13/36 fetuses (36%) had thrombocytopenia: 11/36 (31%) had moderate thrombocytopenia and 2/36 (6%) had severe thrombocytopenia (14 patients had no platelet count at first procedure). The systematic review identified six studies, and the prevalence of fetal thrombocytopenia at the time of PUBS for alloimmunization was 18% (95% confidence interval 11%, 26%).
CONCLUSION
Thrombocytopenia is common and underappreciated in fetuses undergoing PUBS for alloimmunization.
Topics: Anemia; Antigens, Human Platelet; Blood Group Incompatibility; Female; Fetal Blood; Fetal Diseases; Fetoscopy; Gestational Age; Humans; Platelet Count; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Hematologic; Retrospective Studies; Thrombocytopenia
PubMed: 31073147
DOI: 10.1038/s41372-019-0388-8