-
Resuscitation Dec 2021Summarise the evidence regarding the safety of mechanical and manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest patients. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
AIM
Summarise the evidence regarding the safety of mechanical and manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest patients.
METHODS
Two investigators separately screened the articles of EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Central databases. Cohort studies and randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that evaluated the safety of mechanical (LUCAS or AutoPulse) and manual chest compressions in cardiac arrest patients were included. A meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model to calculate the pooled odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The primary outcome was the rate of overall compression-induced injuries. The secondary outcomes included the incidence of life-threatening injuries, skeletal fractures, visceral injuries, and other soft tissue injuries.
RESULTS
The meta-analysis included 11 trials involving 2,818 patients. A significantly higher rate of overall compression-induced injuries was found for mechanical compressions than manual compressions (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.19-1.41), while there was no significant difference between the two groups in respect of the rate of life-threatening injuries. Furthermore, both modalities shared similar incidences of sternal fractures, vertebral fractures, lung, spleen, and kidney injuries. However, compared to mechanical compressions, manual compressions were shown to present a reduced risk of posterior rib fractures, and heart and liver lesions.
CONCLUSIONS
The findings suggested that manual compressions could decrease the risk of compression-induced injuries compared to mechanical compressions in cardiac arrest patients. Interestingly, mechanical compressions have not increased the risk of life-threatening injuries, whereas additional high-quality RCTs are needed to further verify the safety of mechanical chest devices.
TRIAL REGISTRY
INPLASY; Registration number: INPLASY2020110111; URL: https://inplasy.com/.
Topics: Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation; Heart Arrest; Heart Massage; Humans; Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest; Pressure; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Thoracic Injuries; Thorax
PubMed: 34699924
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.10.028 -
Cureus Jul 2023Chronic alcohol use has been associated with impaired pulmonary function, increased risk of pneumonia and poor outcomes after trauma. With a high incidence of rib... (Review)
Review
Chronic alcohol use has been associated with impaired pulmonary function, increased risk of pneumonia and poor outcomes after trauma. With a high incidence of rib fractures in this population, the clinical and physiological factors associated with alcohol dependence may influence how these patients recover from thoracic injuries. Therefore, the aim of the systematic review was to examine the effect of alcohol dependence on rib fracture outcomes. The Embase, PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched for studies examining adult patients with rib fractures, with and without a history of alcohol dependency. The outcomes of interest were mortality, pulmonary complications, intensive care length of stay, ventilator days and hospital length of stay. A meta-analysis was performed to combine the data and compare results. Three studies met the criteria for inclusion in the review and all studies were observational in design. Alcohol dependency was associated with increased mortality (OR 1.44 (95% CI: 1.33-1.56)), pneumonia (OR 2.14 (2.02-2.27)) and ARDS (OR 1.71(1.48-1.98)) as well as longer stays in hospital and intensive care (p<0.05). No difference was found in ventilator days between the two groups. Early intensive care review should be considered to reduce complications in this population alongside prompt management of withdrawal symptoms. However, limited primary research exists on this topic and the quality of current evidence is low. Additional primary research is needed to further understand this correlation and draw meaningful conclusions.
PubMed: 37644941
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.42639 -
European Journal of Trauma and... Oct 2022The aim of this systematic review was to provide an overview of the incidence of combined clavicle and rib fractures and the association between these two injuries. (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
The aim of this systematic review was to provide an overview of the incidence of combined clavicle and rib fractures and the association between these two injuries.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was performed in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases on the 14 of August 2020. Outcome measures were incidence, hospital length of stay (HLOS), intensive care unit admission and length of stay (ILOS), duration of mechanical ventilation (DMV), mortality, chest tube duration, Constant-Murley score, union and complications.
RESULTS
Seven studies with a total of 71,572 patients were included, comprising five studies on epidemiology and two studies on treatment. Among blunt chest trauma patients, 18.6% had concomitant clavicle and rib fractures. The incidence of rib fractures in polytrauma patients with clavicle fractures was 56-60.6% versus 29% in patients without clavicle fractures. Vice versa, 14-18.8% of patients with multiple rib fractures had concomitant clavicle fractures compared to 7.1% in patients without multiple rib fractures. One study reported no complications after fixation of both injuries. Another study on treatment, reported shorter ILOS and less complications among operatively versus conservatively treated patients (5.4 ± 1.5 versus 21 ± 13.6 days).
CONCLUSION
Clavicle fractures and rib fractures are closely related in polytrauma patients and almost a fifth of all blunt chest trauma patients sustain both injuries. Definitive conclusions could not be drawn on treatment of the combined injury. Future research should further investigate indications and benefits of operative treatment of this injury.
Topics: Clavicle; Humans; Length of Stay; Multiple Trauma; Retrospective Studies; Rib Fractures; Thoracic Injuries; Wounds, Nonpenetrating
PubMed: 34075434
DOI: 10.1007/s00068-021-01701-4 -
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma... Feb 2023Multiple rib fractures are associated with significant morbidity and mortality, especially in elderly patients. There is growing interest in surgical stabilization in... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Multiple rib fractures are associated with significant morbidity and mortality, especially in elderly patients. There is growing interest in surgical stabilization in this subgroup of patients. This systematic review compares conservative treatment to surgical fixation in elderly patients (older than 60 years) with multiple rib fractures. The primary outcome is mortality. Secondary outcomes include hospital and intensive care length of stay (HLOS and ILOS), duration of mechanical ventilation (DMV) and pneumonia rates.
METHODS
Multiple databases were searched for comparative studies reporting on conservative versus operative treatment for rib fractures in patients older than 60 years. Both observational studies and randomised clinical trials were considered.
RESULTS
Five observational studies (n = 2583) were included. Mortality was lower in operatively treated patients compared to conservative treatment (4% vs. 8%). Pneumonia rate and DMV were similar (5/6% and 5.8/6.5 days) for either treatment modality. Overall ILOS and HLOS of stay were longer in operatively treated patients (6.5 ILOS and 12.7 HLOS vs. 2.7 ILOS and 6.5 ILOS). There were only minimal reports on perioperative complications. Notably, the median number of rib fractures (8.4 vs. 5) and the percentage of flail chest were higher in operatively treated patients (47% vs. 39%).
CONCLUSION
It remains unknown to what extent conservative and operative treatment contribute individually to reducing morbidity and mortality in the elderly with multiple rib fractures. To date, the quality of evidence is rather low, thus well-performed comparative observational studies or randomised controlled trials considering all confounders are needed to determine whether operative treatment can improve a patient's outcome.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Rib Fractures; Flail Chest; Length of Stay; Fracture Fixation; Spinal Fractures; Pneumonia; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 35137253
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-022-04362-z -
Injury Nov 2020Surgical rib stabilization in flail chest is proven to be beneficial over nonoperative treatment in terms of rate of pneumonia, Intensive Care (IC) length of stay... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
Surgical rib stabilization in flail chest is proven to be beneficial over nonoperative treatment in terms of rate of pneumonia, Intensive Care (IC) length of stay (ICLOS) and mechanical ventilation days. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of operative versus nonoperative treatment on the occurrence of pneumonia and other relevant clinical outcomes in patients with multiple simple rib fractures.
METHODS
A search was performed in Embase, Medline Ovid, Cochrane Central, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The primary outcome was the occurrence of pneumonia. Secondary outcomes were duration of mechanical ventillation, ICLOS, hospital length of stay (HLOS), mortality, and wound infections. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots for the outcome measures and random-effect models were used when heterogeneity of data on outcome measures was significant (I≥40%).
RESULTS
The search resulted in 592 unique records, of which 14 studies on 13 cohorts were included. The 14 studies comprised five prospective and nine retrospective cohort studies with a cumulative total of 4565 patients. Meta-analysis showed a significant decrease of the occurrence of pneumonia (n=2659 patients; risk ratio, RR=0.66; 95% confidential interval [CI] 0.49 to 0.90; p=0.008), mortality (n=4456 patients; RR=0.32; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.54; p<0.001), and HLOS (n=648 patients; mean difference, MD=-5.78 days; 95% CI -10.40 to -1.15; p=0.01) in favor of operative treatment. No effect of operative treatment was found for the duration of mechanical ventilation (n=113 patients; MD=-6.01 days; 95% CI =-19.61 to 7.59; p=0.39), or ICLOS (n=524 patients; MD=-2.93 days; 95% CI -8.65 to 2.80; p=0.32). The postoperative wound infection rate ranged from 0 to 9.4%.
CONCLUSION
Surgical treatment of multiple simple rib fractures may result in a significant reduction of pneumonia, mortality, and hospital length of stay. A reducing effect of treatment on the duration of mechanical ventilation and IC length of stay, was not demonstrated. However, due to nonstandard or absent definitions of outcome measures as well as heterogenous patient groups and the observational design of studies, results must be interpreted with caution and high-quality studies are needed.
Topics: Flail Chest; Humans; Length of Stay; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Rib Fractures
PubMed: 32650981
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.07.009 -
Journal of Thoracic Disease Sep 2023There is no consensus on the effectiveness of surgical stabilization in multiple rib fractures in Asia, especially among patients with a non-flail rib fracture pattern....
BACKGROUND
There is no consensus on the effectiveness of surgical stabilization in multiple rib fractures in Asia, especially among patients with a non-flail rib fracture pattern. We aim to synthesize the evidence on the effectiveness of surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) in an Asian population with multiple non-flail rib fractures.
METHODS
The MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched in this systematic literature review and meta-analysis to identify studies conducted in Asia that included patients with multiple non-flail rib fractures in at least one of their treatment groups. The intervention of interest was SSRF, and the comparator was a nonoperative treatment. The duration of mechanical ventilation (DMV) was the primary outcome. Posttreatment pain score, pneumonia, atelectasis, intensive care unit length of stay (ICU LOS), hospital length of stay (HLOS), need for tracheostomy, respiratory function, functional outcomes, quality of life (QoL), and mortality were identified as the secondary outcomes. A random effects model (REM) was used to pool data for outcomes reported in two or more studies.
RESULTS
A total of 12 studies (n=2,440 patients) were included. There was a significantly shorter DMV {mean difference (MD): -5.23 [95% confidence interval (CI): -9.64 to -0.81], P=0.02}, lower 4-week post-treatment pain score [standard mean difference (SMD): -2.24 (95% CI: -3.18 to -1.31), P<0.00001], lower risk for pneumonia [risk ratio (RR): 0.46 (95% CI: 0.23 to 0.95), P=0.04], lower risk for atelectasis [RR: 0.44, (95% CI: 0.29 to 0.65), P<0.0001], shorter ICU LOS [MD: -4.00 (95% CI: -6.33 to -1.66), P=0.0008], and shorter HLOS [MD: -6.54 (95% CI: -9.28 to -3.79), P<0.00001] in favor of SSRF. Effect estimates for the need for tracheostomy [RR: 0.67 (95% CI: 0.42 to 1.08), P=0.10] and mortality [RR: 0.94 (95% CI: 0.37 to 2.41), P=0.90] were nonsignificant.
CONCLUSIONS
In the Asian population with mainly non-flail rib fracture patterns, SSRF was associated with shorter DMV, ICU LOS, and HLOS as well as lower risks for atelectasis and pneumonia, and pain scores after 4 weeks. The risk of mortality was comparable between treatment groups.
PubMed: 37868848
DOI: 10.21037/jtd-23-1117 -
The South African Journal of... 2022Rib fractures are a common thoracic injury and notable source of chest pain. Chest pain may lead to compromised respiratory and physical function. (Review)
Review
Effectiveness of nonpharmacological therapeutic interventions on pain and physical function in adults with rib fractures during acute care: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Rib fractures are a common thoracic injury and notable source of chest pain. Chest pain may lead to compromised respiratory and physical function.
OBJECTIVES
Our study aimed to synthesise the evidence on the effectiveness of nonpharmacological therapeutic interventions on pain and physical function in adults admitted with rib fractures to acute care settings. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS), respiratory complications, respiratory function and mortality rate.
METHOD
A systematic literature search of English articles in nine databases was conducted. The Joanna Briggs Institute's System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information (SUMARI) was used to conduct our study. Articles written from January 2000 to December 2017 were considered and a search update was completed in 2021. Meta-analysis was conducted for pre- versus post-bundle of care implementation for LOS, pneumonia incidence and mortality rate. Certainty of evidence was appraised using the grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) approach.
RESULTS
Sixteen studies were included ( = 2034). Certain interventions were shown to improve respiratory function and reduce pain, pulmonary complications, LOS and mortality rate. No interventions were identified which objectively improved physical function. Meta-analysis showed a statistically significant reduction in relative risk of developing pneumonia ( = 0.00) by 63% following bundled care implementation. Certainty of evidence for this outcome was rated as very low following GRADE appraisal.
CONCLUSION
Nonpharmacological therapeutic interventions used in combination with pharmacological management are viable treatment options to reduce pain, improve respiratory function and reduce the incidence of respiratory complications following acute rib fractures.
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
Acupuncture, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), noninvasive ventilation (NIV) modalities, physiotherapy techniques and multidisciplinary pathways used alongside pharmacological interventions are effective modalities for use in the treatment of acute rib fractures. Multidisciplinary care pathways are important management strategies and reduce the risk of developing pneumonia.
PubMed: 35814044
DOI: 10.4102/sajp.v78i1.1764 -
World Journal of Emergency Surgery :... Mar 2024Operative treatment of traumatic rib fractures for better outcomes remains under debate. Surgical stabilization of rib fractures has dramatically increased in the last... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Operative treatment of traumatic rib fractures for better outcomes remains under debate. Surgical stabilization of rib fractures has dramatically increased in the last decade. This study aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the effectiveness and safety of operative treatment compared to conservative treatment in adult patients with traumatic multiple rib fractures.
METHODS
A systematic literature review was performed according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and used the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 tool to evaluate methodological quality. Relative risks with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for outcomes: all-cause mortality, pneumonia incidence, and number of mechanical ventilation days. Overall certainty of evidence was evaluated with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, with trial sequential analysis performed to establish implications for further research.
RESULTS
From 719 records, we included nine RCTs, which recruited 862 patients. Patients were assigned to the operative group (received surgical stabilization of chest wall injury, n = 423) or control group (n = 439). All-cause mortality was not significantly different (RR = 0.53; 95% CI 0.21 to 1.38, P = 0.35, I = 11%) between the two groups. However, in the operative group, duration of mechanical ventilation (mean difference -4.62; 95% CI -7.64 to -1.60, P < 0.00001, I = 94%) and length of intensive care unit stay (mean difference -3.05; 95% CI -5.87 to -0.22; P < 0.00001, I = 96%) were significantly shorter, and pneumonia incidence (RR = 0.57; 95% CI 0.35 to 0.92; P = 0.02, I = 57%) was significantly lower. Trial sequential analysis for mortality indicated insufficient sample size for a definitive judgment. GRADE showed this meta-analysis to have very low to low confidence.
CONCLUSION
Meta-analysis of large-scale trials showed that surgical stabilization of multiple rib fractures shortened the duration of mechanical ventilation and reduced the incidence of pneumonia but lacked clear evidence for improvement of mortality compared to conservative treatment. Trial sequential analysis suggested the need for more cases, and GRADE highlighted low certainty, emphasizing the necessity for further targeted RCTs, especially in mechanically ventilated patients.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
UMIN Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000049365.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Rib Fractures; Length of Stay; Thoracic Injuries; Pneumonia; Respiration, Artificial; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 38504282
DOI: 10.1186/s13017-024-00540-z -
Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons... Apr 2022Multiple traumatic rib fractures are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The last decade has seen a significant increase in rates of surgical fixation... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Multiple traumatic rib fractures are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The last decade has seen a significant increase in rates of surgical fixation for both flail and non-flail rib fractures; the evidence for this has come from largely retrospective studies. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of this approach with that of non-operative management.
METHODS
A systematic search of the literature was performed to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing surgical stabilisation to non-operative management. Both flail and non-flail injuries were included.
RESULTS
Five RCTs reported the results of 286 patients. Only one study assessed non-flail fractures. The studies were heterogenic in nature and of mixed quality. Surgical stabilisation was associated with a reduction in pneumonia (RR 0.46, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.29 to 0.73, I=42%, =0.001). The duration of mechanical ventilation (mean difference (MD) -6.3, 95% CI -12.16 to -0.43, I=95%, =0.05) and critical care length of stay was also shorter after surgery (mean difference -6.46 days, 95% CI 9.73 to -3.19, <0.001); however, the overall length of stay in hospital was not (MD -7.18, 95% CI -15.63 to -1.28, I=94%, =0.1). No study demonstrated a significant reduction in mortality (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.18 to 1.8, I=0%, =0.28).
CONCLUSIONS
Surgical stabilisation of rib fractures is associated with some improved clinical outcomes. Further large RCTs are still needed to confirm if there is also a survival benefit.
Topics: Flail Chest; Humans; Length of Stay; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Respiration, Artificial; Rib Fractures; Wounds, Nonpenetrating
PubMed: 34928718
DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2021.0148 -
European Journal of Trauma and... Aug 2019Many studies report on outcomes of analgesic therapy for (suspected) traumatic rib fractures. However, the literature is inconclusive and diverse regarding the... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
Many studies report on outcomes of analgesic therapy for (suspected) traumatic rib fractures. However, the literature is inconclusive and diverse regarding the management of pain and its effect on pain relief and associated complications. This systematic review and meta-analysis summarizes and compares reduction of pain for the different treatment modalities and as secondary outcome mortality during hospitalization, length of mechanical ventilation, length of hospital stay, length of intensive care unit stay (ICU) and complications such as respiratory, cardiovascular, and/or analgesia-related complications, for four different types of analgesic therapy: epidural analgesia, intravenous analgesia, paravertebral blocks and intercostal blocks.
METHODS
PubMed, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases were searched to identify comparative studies investigating epidural, intravenous, paravertebral and intercostal interventions for traumatic rib fractures, without restriction for study type. The search strategy included keywords and MeSH or Emtree terms relating blunt chest trauma (including rib fractures), analgesic interventions, pain management and complications.
RESULTS
A total of 19 papers met our inclusion criteria and were finally included in this systematic review. Significant differences were found in favor of epidural analgesia for the reduction of pain. No significant differences were observed between epidural analgesia, intravenous analgesia, paravertebral blocks and intercostal blocks, for the secondary outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
Results of this study show that epidural analgesia provides better pain relief than the other modalities. No differences were observed for secondary endpoints like length of ICU stay, length of mechanical ventilation or pulmonary complications. However, the quality of the available evidence is low, and therefore, preclude strong recommendations.
Topics: Administration, Intravenous; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Analgesia, Epidural; Analgesics; Critical Care; Epidemiologic Methods; Humans; Length of Stay; Middle Aged; Musculoskeletal Pain; Nerve Block; Pain Measurement; Rib Fractures; Young Adult
PubMed: 29411048
DOI: 10.1007/s00068-018-0918-7