-
ESMO Open Jun 2023Hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer is a distinct subtype with different prognosis and response... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer is a distinct subtype with different prognosis and response to treatment. HER2-targeted therapy is currently recommended for patients with HR+/HER2+ advanced breast cancer. However, there is debate over which drugs to add on the basis of HER2 blockade yield the optimal efficacy. This systematic review and network meta-analysis was conducted to solve the problem.
METHODS
Eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different interventions in HR+/HER2+ metastatic breast cancer were included. The outcomes of interest included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Pooled hazard ratios or odds ratios with credible intervals (CrIs) were calculated to estimate the predefined outcomes. The optimal therapeutics were identified by comparing the surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA).
RESULTS
Totally, 23 literatures of 20 RCTs were included. Regarding PFS, significant differences were detected between single or dual HER2 blockade plus endocrine therapy (ET) versus ET alone and dual HER2 blockade plus ET versus physician's choice. Trastuzumab, pertuzumab plus chemotherapy significantly improved PFS than trastuzumab plus chemotherapy (hazard ratio 0.69, 95% CrI 0.50-0.92). The SUCRA values suggested the relatively better efficacy of dual HER2-targeted therapy plus ET (86%-91%) than chemotherapy (62%-81%) in prolonging PFS and OS. The HER2 blockade-containing regimens showed similar safety profiles in eight documented TRAEs.
CONCLUSIONS
Prominent status of dual-targeted therapy for patients with HR+/HER2+ metastatic breast cancer was revealed. Compared with chemotherapy-containing regimens, the ET-containing ones showed better efficacy and similar safety profiles, which could be recommended in clinical practice.
Topics: Humans; Female; Network Meta-Analysis; Receptor, ErbB-2; Breast Neoplasms; Trastuzumab; Progression-Free Survival
PubMed: 37084609
DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101216 -
Life Sciences Apr 2022Plastic particles (PP) pollution is a global environmental concern. Although the reproductive toxicity of PP is primarily understood for invertebrates, the evidence for... (Review)
Review
AIMS
Plastic particles (PP) pollution is a global environmental concern. Although the reproductive toxicity of PP is primarily understood for invertebrates, the evidence for mammals is still fragmented. We used a systematic review framework to investigate the reproductive impact of microplastics and nanoplastics (MNP) on mammals.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Research records were screened from Embase, Medline, Scopus and Web of Science. Twelve original papers were identified and reviewed. Immunological, oxidative and morphofunctional outcomes, and the risk of bias in all studies reviewed were analyzed.
KEY FINDINGS
These studies indicated that PP can accumulate in the gonads, triggering seminiferous degeneration, Sertoli cells death, blood-testis barrier disruption, sperm degeneration, malformation, reduced number and mobility, ovarian cysts, reduced follicular growth and granulosa cells death. Gonadal damage was associated with upregulation of prooxidant mediators (oxygen reactive species, lipid and DNA oxidation), cell death, proinflammatory molecular pathways and cytokines, as well as inhibition of enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant defense mechanisms. Spermatogenesis, folliculogenesis, testosterone, progesterone and estrogen levels were also impaired in PP-treated animals, which were potentially associated with down-regulation of molecules involved in germ cells microstructural organization (occludin, N-cadherin, β-catenin and connexin 43) and steroidogenesis, such as hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases, steroidogenic acute regulatory proteins, follicle stimulating and luteinizing hormones. Selection, performance and detection bias were the main limitations identified.
SIGNIFICANCE
Current evidence indicates that PP can induce dose-dependent microstructural and functional gonadal damage, which is orchestrated by pro-oxidant and pro-inflammatory mechanisms that disrupt genes, molecular effectors, and hormones that control spermatogenesis and folliculogenesis.
Topics: Animals; Estrogens; Female; Genitalia; Germ Cells; Granulosa Cells; Inflammation; Intestinal Mucosa; Luteinizing Hormone; Male; Mammals; Microplastics; Ovarian Follicle; Ovary; Oxidative Stress; Plastics; Progesterone; Reproduction; Sertoli Cells; Spermatogenesis; Testis; Testosterone
PubMed: 35176278
DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2022.120404 -
International Journal of Molecular... Dec 2022Human placental lactogen (hPL) is a placental hormone which appears to have key metabolic functions in pregnancy. Preclinical studies have putatively linked hPL to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Human placental lactogen (hPL) is a placental hormone which appears to have key metabolic functions in pregnancy. Preclinical studies have putatively linked hPL to maternal and fetal outcomes, yet-despite human observational data spanning several decades-evidence on the role and importance of this hormone remains disparate and conflicting. We aimed to explore (via systematic review and meta-analysis) the relationship between hPL levels, maternal pre-existing and gestational metabolic conditions, and fetal growth. MEDLINE via OVID, CINAHL plus, and Embase were searched from inception through 9 May 2022. Eligible studies included women who were pregnant or up to 12 months post-partum, and reported at least one endogenous maternal serum hPL level during pregnancy in relation to pre-specified metabolic outcomes. Two independent reviewers extracted data. Meta-analysis was conducted where possible; for other outcomes narrative synthesis was performed. 35 studies met eligibility criteria. No relationship was noted between hPL and gestational diabetes status. In type 1 diabetes mellitus, hPL levels appeared lower in early pregnancy (possibly reflecting delayed placental development) and higher in late pregnancy (possibly reflecting increased placental mass). Limited data were found in other pre-existing metabolic conditions. Levels of hPL appear to be positively related to placental mass and infant birthweight in pregnancies affected by maternal diabetes. The relationship between hPL, a purported pregnancy metabolic hormone, and maternal metabolism in human pregnancy is complex and remains unclear. This antenatal biomarker may offer value, but future studies in well-defined contemporary populations are required.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Placental Lactogen; Placenta; Placental Hormones; Fetal Development; Biomarkers
PubMed: 36555258
DOI: 10.3390/ijms232415621 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Nov 2021In an effort to improve outcomes of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) cycles, the use of growth hormone (GH) has been considered as adjuvant treatment in ovarian stimulation.... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
In an effort to improve outcomes of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) cycles, the use of growth hormone (GH) has been considered as adjuvant treatment in ovarian stimulation. Improving the outcomes of IVF is especially important for women with infertility who are considered 'poor responders'. We have compared the outcomes of IVF with adjuvant GH versus no adjuvant treatment in routine use, and specifically in poor responders.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effectiveness and safety of growth hormone as an adjunct to IVF compared to standard IVF for women with infertility SEARCH METHODS: We searched the following databases (to November 2020): Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility (CGF) Group specialised register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Epistemonikos database and trial registers together with reference checking and contact with study authors and experts in the field to identify additional trials.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of adjuvant GH treatment in IVF compared with no adjuvant treatment for women with infertility. We excluded trials where additional adjuvant treatments were used with GH. We also excluded trials comparing different IVF protocols.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard methodological procedures recommended by Cochrane. Two review authors independently performed assessment of trial risk of bias and extraction of relevant data. The primary review outcome was live birth rate. The secondary outcomes were clinical pregnancy rate, oocytes retrieved, embryo transfer, units of gonadotropin used and adverse events, i.e. ectopic pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), congenital anomalies, oedema.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 16 RCTs (1352 women). Two RCTs (80 women) studied GH in routine use, and 14 RCTs (1272 women) studied GH in poor responders. The evidence was low to very low certainty, the main limitations being risk of bias, imprecision and heterogeneity. Adjuvant growth hormone compared to no adjuvant: routine use for in vitro fertilisation (IVF) The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of GH on live birth rate per woman randomised for routine use in IVF (odds ratio (OR) 1.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40 to 4.43; I = 0%; 2 trials, 80 participants; very low-certainty evidence). If the chance of live birth without adjuvant GH is assumed to be 15%, the chance of live birth with GH would be between 6% and 43%. There was insufficient evidence to reach a conclusion regarding clinical pregnancy rates per woman randomised, number of women with at least one oocyte retrieved per woman randomised and embryo transfer achieved per woman randomised; reported data were unsuitable for analysis. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of GH on mean number of oocytes retrieved in normal responders (mean difference (MD) -0.02, 95% CI -0.79 to 0.74; I = 0%; 2 trials, 80 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of GH on mean units of gonadotropin used in normal responders (MD 13.57, 95% CI -112.88 to 140.01; I = 0%; 2 trials, 80 participants; very low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain of the effect of GH on adverse events in normal responders. Adjuvant growth hormone compared to no adjuvant: use in poor responders for in vitro fertilisation (IVF) The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of GH on live birth rate per woman randomised for poor responders (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.70; I = 0%; 8 trials, 737 participants; very low-certainty evidence). If the chance of live birth without adjuvant GH is assumed to be 11%, the chance of live birth with GH would be between 13% and 25%. Adjuvant GH results in a slight increase in pregnancy rates in poor responders (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.35 to 2.53; I = 15%; 11 trials, 1033 participants; low-certainty evidence). The results suggest, if the pregnancy rate without adjuvant GH is assumed to be 15%, with GH the pregnancy rate in poor responders would be between 19% and 31%. The evidence suggests that GH results in little to no difference in number of women with at least one oocyte retrieved (OR 5.67, 95% CI 1.54 to 20.83; I = 0%; 2 trials, 148 participants; low-certainty evidence). If the chance of retrieving at least one oocyte in poor responders was 81%, with GH the chance is between 87% and 99%. There is a slight increase in mean number of oocytes retrieved with the use of GH for poor responders (MD 1.40, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.64; I = 87%; 12 trials, 1153 participants; low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of GH on embryo transfer achieved (OR 2.32, 95% CI 1.08 to 4.96; I = 25%; 4 trials, 214 participants; very low-certainty evidence). If the chance of achieving embryo transfer is assumed to be 77%, the chance with GH will be 78% to 94%. Use of GH results in reduction of mean units of gonadotropins used for stimulation in poor responders (MD -1088.19, 95% CI -1203.20 to -973.18; I = 91%; 8 trials, 685 participants; low-certainty evidence). High heterogeneity in the analyses for mean number of oocytes retrieved and units of GH used suggests quite different effects according to differences including in trial protocols (populations, GH dose and schedule), so these results should be interpreted with caution. We are uncertain of the effect of GH on adverse events in poor responders as six of the 14 included trials failed to report this outcome.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
The use of adjuvant GH in IVF treatment protocols has uncertain effect on live birth rates and mean number of oocytes retrieved in normal responders. However, it slightly increases the number of oocytes retrieved and pregnancy rates in poor responders, while there is an uncertain effect on live birth rates in this group. The results however, need to be interpreted with caution, as the included trials were small and few in number, with significant bias and imprecision. Also, the dose and regimen of GH used in trials was variable. Therefore, further research is necessary to fully define the role of GH as adjuvant therapy in IVF.
Topics: Abortion, Spontaneous; Female; Fertilization in Vitro; Growth Hormone; Humans; Live Birth; Ovulation Induction; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Rate; Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic
PubMed: 34808697
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000099.pub4 -
Frontiers in Pediatrics 2021Intralesional steroid injections (ISI) are a widely used technique for various pediatric indications and represent a possible adjuvant treatment for anastomotic...
OBJECTIVE
Intralesional steroid injections (ISI) are a widely used technique for various pediatric indications and represent a possible adjuvant treatment for anastomotic esophageal strictures. Yet, no consensus has been reached neither on their safety in the pediatric population or their effectiveness in esophageal atresia patients. This systematic review aimed to assess the safety of ISI in young children through a meta-analysis and to summarize the current knowledge on the effectiveness of ISI in anastomotic esophageal strictures.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was performed in Embase, Medline, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Google Scholar up to August 16 2021. Studies focusing on ISI and involving children up to 2 years were included in the meta-analysis for the safety assessment. All studies evaluating the use of ISI as adjuvant treatment in anastomotic esophageal strictures in children were included in the systematic review to assess the effectiveness of the intervention.
RESULTS
The literature search yielded 8,253 articles. A total of 57 studies were included, of which 55 for the safety and five for the effectiveness assessment. The overall complication rate was 7%, with a greater incidence of local complications compared to systemic complications. Six studies (with a total of 367 patients) evaluated adrenocorticotropic hormone and cortisol levels, of which four reported hypothalamic-pituitary axis suppression. Two children (0.6%) received replacement therapy and all patients recovered uneventfully. A mean number of 1.67 ISI were performed per esophageal atresia (EA) patient. A reduction of needed dilatations was seen after ISI, compared to the number of dilatations performed before the intervention (5.2 vs. 1.3).
CONCLUSION
The insufficient data emphasized the need for further prospective and comparative studies. Results from this meta-analysis and systematic review address ISI as a safe and effective technique. Close clinical follow-up and growth curve evaluation are advisable in patients receiving ISI.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO, identifier: CRD42021281584.
PubMed: 35165653
DOI: 10.3389/fped.2021.825030 -
Diabetologia Oct 2022The physiological counterregulatory response to hypoglycaemia is reported to be organised hierarchically, with hormone responses usually preceding symptomatic awareness... (Review)
Review
AIM/HYPOTHESIS
The physiological counterregulatory response to hypoglycaemia is reported to be organised hierarchically, with hormone responses usually preceding symptomatic awareness and autonomic responses preceding neuroglycopenic responses. To compare thresholds for activation of these responses more accurately between people with or without type 1 diabetes, we performed a systematic review on stepped hyperinsulinaemic-hypoglycaemic glucose clamps.
METHODS
A literature search in PubMed and EMBASE was conducted. We included articles published between 1980 and 2018 involving hyperinsulinaemic stepped hypoglycaemic glucose clamps among people with or without type 1 diabetes. Key exclusion criteria were as follows: data were previously published; other patient population; a clamp not the primary intervention; and an inadequate clamp description. Glycaemic thresholds for counterregulatory hormone and/or symptom responses to hypoglycaemia were estimated and compared using generalised logrank test for interval-censored data, where the intervals were either extracted directly or calculated from the data provided by the study. A glycaemic threshold was defined as the glucose level at which the response exceeded the 95% CI of the mean baseline measurement or euglycaemic control clamp. Because of the use of interval-censored data, we described thresholds using median and IQR.
RESULTS
A total of 63 articles were included, whereof 37 papers included participants with type 1 diabetes (n=559; 67.4% male sex, aged 32.7±10.2 years, BMI 23.8±1.4 kg/m) and 51 papers included participants without diabetes (n=733; 72.4% male sex, aged 31.1±9.2 years, BMI 23.6±1.1 kg/m). Compared with non-diabetic control individuals, in people with type 1 diabetes, the median (IQR) glycaemic thresholds for adrenaline (3.8 [3.2-4.2] vs 3.4 [2.8-3.9 mmol/l]), noradrenaline (3.2 [3.2-3.7] vs 3.0 [2.8-3.1] mmol/l), cortisol (3.5 [3.2-4.2]) vs 2.8 [2.8-3.4] mmol/l) and growth hormone (3.8 [3.3-3.8] vs. 3.2 [3.0-3.3] mmol/l) all occurred at lower glucose levels in people with diabetes than in those without diabetes (all p≤0.01). Similarly, although both autonomic (median [IQR] 3.4 [3.4-3.4] vs 3.0 [2.8-3.4] mmol/l) and neuroglycopenic (median [IQR] 3.4 [2.8-N/A] vs 3.0 [3.0-3.1] mmol/l) symptom responses were elicited at lower glucose levels in people with type 1 diabetes, the thresholds for autonomic and neuroglycopenic symptoms did not differ for each individual subgroup.
CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION
People with type 1 diabetes have glycaemic thresholds for counterregulatory hormone and symptom responses at lower glucose levels than people without diabetes. Autonomic and neuroglycopenic symptoms responses are generated at about similar levels of hypoglycaemia. There was a considerable variation in the methodology of the articles and the high insulin doses in most of the clamps may affect the counterregulatory responses.
FUNDING
This article has received funding from the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking (JU) under grant agreement no. 777460.
REGISTRATION
This systematic review is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42019120083).
Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Epinephrine; Female; Growth Hormone; Humans; Hydrocortisone; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Male; Norepinephrine
PubMed: 35867127
DOI: 10.1007/s00125-022-05749-8 -
Annals of Palliative Medicine Dec 2022In previous studies on the application of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy in advanced breast cancer, the outcomes of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Efficacy and safety of CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy versus endocrine therapy alone in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
In previous studies on the application of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy in advanced breast cancer, the outcomes of overall survival (OS) were inconsistent. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to further evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy on patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer.
METHODS
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CDK4/6 inhibitors plus endocrine therapy and endocrine therapy alone in patients with HR-positive and HER2-negative advanced breast cancer were searched in the databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WANFANG and China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP) up to November 2022. Hazard ratios (HRs) and confidence intervals (CI) of OS, progression-free survival (PFS), the time from randomization to the first recorded disease progression while the patient was receiving next-line therapy or death from any cause (PFS2), time to first subsequent chemotherapy after discontinuation (TTC), and objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), safety indicators were extracted. Stata 14.0 software was used for meta analysis and the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool 2.0 was used to evaluate the bias risk.
RESULTS
A total of 9 RCTs with 4,920 participants were included. The addition of CDK4/6 inhibitors to endocrine therapy significantly prolonged OS (HR 0.76; 95% CI: 0.69-0.84; P<0.001), regardless of the application in first-line and second-line treatment, compared with endocrine therapy alone. Similar benefit was observed in PFS (HR 0.56; 95% CI: 0.52-0.60; P<0.001). Moreover, the CDK4/6 inhibitors group improved results of ORR [relative risk (RR) 1.43; 95% CI: 1.27-1.62; P<0.001], CBR (RR 1.24; 95% CI: 1.08-1.41; P<0.01 and RR 1.11; 95% CI: 1.06-1.18; P<0.001), PFS2 (HR 0.68; 95% CI: 0.60-0.76; P<0.001) and TTC (HR 0.65; 95% CI: 0.58-0.72; P<0.001). One of the included RCTs had performance bias. Publication bias was not significant.
CONCLUSIONS
CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy effectively prolong OS, PFS, PFS2, and TTC, and also improve ORR and CBR in patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer, and the safety was within the controllable range.
Topics: Female; Humans; Breast Neoplasms; Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4; Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6; Progression-Free Survival; Treatment Outcome; Protein Kinase Inhibitors
PubMed: 36635998
DOI: 10.21037/apm-22-1306 -
Bone Reports Dec 2021Osteoporosis is characterised by low bone mass and micro-architectural deterioration of bone structure. Its treatment is directed at the processes of bone formation or... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Osteoporosis is characterised by low bone mass and micro-architectural deterioration of bone structure. Its treatment is directed at the processes of bone formation or resorption, that are of utmost importance in fracture healing. We provide a comprehensive review of the literature aiming to summarize and clarify the effects of osteoporosis and its treatment on fracture healing.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
A literature search was conducted in PubMed and Embase (OVID version). In vivo animal and human studies on long bone fractures were included. A total of 93 articles were included for this review; 23 studies on the effect of osteoporosis (18 animal and 5 clinical studies) and 70 studies on the effect of osteoporosis treatment (41 animal, 26 clinical studies and 3 meta-analyses) on fracture healing.
RESULTS
In animal fracture models osteoporosis was associated with decreased callus formation and bone growth, bone mineral density, biomechanical strength and delayed cellular and differentiation processes during fracture healing. Two large databases identified osteoporosis as a risk factor for non-union whereas three other studies did not. One of those three studies however found a prolonged healing time in patients with osteoporosis. Anti-osteoporosis medication showed inconsistent effects on fracture healing in both non-osteoporotic and osteoporotic animal models. Only the parathyroid hormone and anti-resorption medication were related to improved fracture healing and delayed remodelling respectively. Clinical studies performed in predominantly hip and distal radius fracture patients showed no effect of bisphosphonates on fracture healing. Parathyroid hormone reduced time to union in several clinical trials performed in mainly hip fracture patients, but this did not result in decreased delayed or non-union rates.
CONCLUSION
Evidence that substantiates the negative influence of osteoporosis on fracture healing is predominantly from animal studies and to a lesser extent from clinical studies, since convincing clinical evidence lacks. Bisphosphonates and parathyroid hormone may be used during fracture healing, since no clear negative effect has been shown. Parathyroid hormone might even decrease time to fracture union, without decreasing union rate.
PubMed: 34458509
DOI: 10.1016/j.bonr.2021.101117 -
Andrology Mar 2021To evaluate the association between cannabis use and testicular function (as assessed through semen quality and serum hormone levels) in different populations. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the association between cannabis use and testicular function (as assessed through semen quality and serum hormone levels) in different populations.
EVIDENCE REVIEW
Systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based retrospective cohort studies. PRISMA guidelines were used for abstracting data and assessing data quality and validity. Data were pooled using a fixed-effects or random-effects model depending on the heterogeneity of studies included. Pooled risk ratio (RR) of having any sperm abnormality and testosterone, FSH, and LH standardized mean differences among male cannabis users and non-users, and meta-regression analysis according to age and year of publication.
RESULTS
Nine studies were evaluated which included 4014 men with semen data and 4787 with hormonal data. Overall among 1158 cannabis users, 44.9% had impaired semen parameters, compared with 24.5% of the 2856 non-users. The relative risk among cannabis users for any abnormal semen parameter was 1.159 (95% CI: 0.840; 1.599, P = 0.369). The standardized mean difference between user and non-user testosterone levels was -0.139 (95% CI: -0.413; 0.134, P = 0.318). For FSH, the standardized mean difference estimate was -0.142 (95% CI: -0.243; -0.0425, P = 0.005), while for LH the standardized mean difference estimate was -0.318 (95% CI: -0.810-0.175; P = 0.206).
CONCLUSIONS
The current evidence does not suggest clinically significant associations between cannabis use and testicular function. However, we cannot exclude an effect of cannabis because of the limited and heterogeneous studies. Additionally, well-designed studies will be needed to define the association between cannabis use and the male reproductive system.
Topics: Cannabis; Gonadotropins; Humans; Male; Marijuana Use; Semen Analysis; Testis; Testosterone
PubMed: 33251770
DOI: 10.1111/andr.12953 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2023To investigate the efficacy of monotherapy with AIs or GnRHa in improving the height of boys with idiopathic short stature (ISS). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Comparative efficacy of aromatase inhibitors and gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue in increasing final height of idiopathic short stature boys: a network meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the efficacy of monotherapy with AIs or GnRHa in improving the height of boys with idiopathic short stature (ISS).
METHOD
We performed a systematic search in Pubmed, The Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases, and Wanfang Database for eligible studies. The network meta-analysis was conducted using STATA software.
RESULTS
We identified a total of four studies that included 136 individuals. We used FAH/PAH as the main outcome of final height. The results revealed a statistically higher final height after treatment with AI or GnRHa in idiopathic short stature children(MD= 4.63, 95% CI[3.29,5.96]). In network meta-analysis, the direct and indirect comparison between AI and GnRHa was presented in the forest plot. Compared with control group, both AI and GnRHa were effective in increasing the final height, with the mean effect of 4.91(95%CI:1.10,8.17) and 5.55(95%CI:1.12,9.98) respectively. However, there was no statistical difference between the GnRHa and AI treatment, of which the mean effect was 0.65(95%CI: -4.30,5.60).
CONCLUSION
Both AIs and GnRHa monotherapy were effective in augmenting the final height of boys with idiopathic short stature when compared to placebo groups. However, there was no statistical difference between the GnRHa and AI treatments.
Topics: Male; Child; Humans; Aromatase Inhibitors; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Network Meta-Analysis; Body Height; Human Growth Hormone; Dwarfism
PubMed: 37124748
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1167351