-
Frontiers in Surgery 2022Ventral hernia repair is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures worldwide. To reduce the risk of complications, pre- and intra-operative strategies have... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Ventral hernia repair is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures worldwide. To reduce the risk of complications, pre- and intra-operative strategies have received increasing focus in recent years. To assess possible preventive surgical strategies, this European Hernia Society endorsed project was launched. The aim of this review was to evaluate the current literature focusing on pre- and intra-operative strategies for surgical site occurrences (SSO) and specifically surgical site infection (SSI) in ventral hernia repair.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted and reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Databases used were Pubmed and Web of Science. Original retrospective or prospective human adult studies describing at least one intra-operative intervention to reduce SSO after ventral hernia repair were considered eligible.
RESULTS
From a total of 4775 results, a total of 18 papers were considered suitable after full text reading. Prehospital chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) scrub appears to increase the risk of SSO in patients undergoing ventral hernia repair, while there is no association between any type of surgical hat worn and the incidence of postoperative wound events. Intraoperative measures as prophylactic negative pressure therapy, surgical drain placement and the use of quilt sutures seem beneficial for decreasing the incidence of SSO and/or SSI. No positive effect has been shown for antibiotic soaking of a synthetic mesh, nor for the use of fibrin sealants.
CONCLUSION
This review identified a limited amount of literature describing specific preventive measures and techniques during ventral hernia repair. An advantage of prophylactic negative pressure therapy in prevention of SSI was observed, but different tools to decrease SSIs and SSOs continuously further need our full attention to improve patient outcomes and to lower overall costs.
PubMed: 35910469
DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.847279 -
Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and... Aug 2022To systematically review the literature to evaluate the biomechanical properties of the interference screw (IS) versus suture anchor (SA) techniques for patellar and... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
To systematically review the literature to evaluate the biomechanical properties of the interference screw (IS) versus suture anchor (SA) techniques for patellar and femoral fixation of medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed, the Cochrane library, and Embase using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to identify studies that analyzed the biomechanical properties of IS and SA techniques for MPFL reconstruction. The search phrase implemented was "medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction biomechanics." Evaluated outcomes included ultimate load to failure (N), stiffness (N/mm), and mode of failure. Forest plots were created for statistical analysis and heterogeneity was assessed via statistic.
RESULTS
Six studies met inclusion criteria, including a total of 108 cadaveric specimens, for MPFL patellar fixation, and 3 studies met inclusion criteria, including a total of 50 cadaveric specimens, for MPFL femoral fixation. Pooled analysis from 5 studies reporting on stiffness for MPFL patellar fixation revealed a statistically significant difference in favor of IS compared with SA ( = .007). Pooled analysis from 3 studies reporting on ultimate load to failure of femoral fixation revealed a statistically significant difference in favor of IS compared with SA ( = .043).
CONCLUSIONS
The use of IS was associated with a greater stiffness compared with the use of SA in MPFL patellar fixation, but there was no difference in load to failure between IS and SA. The use of IS was associated with a greater load to failure compared with the use of SA in MPFL femoral fixation, but there was no difference in stiffness between IS and SA.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
There have been multiple individual biomechanical studies conducted comparing IS and SA fixation for MPFL patellar and femoral fixation; however, they have yielded conflicting results, with small sample sizes. Pooling the data from these studies in a meta-analysis may allow for more meaningful biomechanical data to coincide with the existing, albeit scarce, clinical data, this may help to inform clinical decision making for surgeons managing these injuries.
PubMed: 36033175
DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2022.05.003 -
Arthroscopy : the Journal of... Feb 2022To determine whether the use of suture tape augmentation (ST) would lead to improved clinical outcomes, increased stability, shorter postoperative immobilization, and... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
To determine whether the use of suture tape augmentation (ST) would lead to improved clinical outcomes, increased stability, shorter postoperative immobilization, and earlier return to activity and sports compared with Broström repair (BR) in surgical treatment of chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI).
METHODS
A systematic literature search was performed using Pubmed and Embase according to PRISMA guidelines. The following search terms were used: ankle instability, suture tape, fiber tape, and internal brace. Full-text articles in English that directly compared BR and ST cohorts were included, with a minimum cohort size of 40 patients. Exclusion criteria were former systematic reviews, biomechanical studies, and case reports.
RESULTS
Ultimately, 7 clinical trials were included in this systematic review. Regarding the clinical and radiologic outcomes and complication rates, no major differences were detected between groups. Recurrence of instability and revision surgeries tended to occur more often after BR, whereas irritation of the peroneal nerve and tendons seemed to occur more frequently after ST. Postoperative rehabilitation protocols were either the same for both groups or more aggressive in the ST groups. When both techniques were performed with arthroscopic assistance, return to sports was significantly faster in the ST groups.
CONCLUSIONS
In conclusion, suture tape augmentation showed excellent results and is a safe technique comparable to traditional Broström repair. No major differences regarding clinical and radiologic outcomes or complications were found.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
III, systematic review of level I, II, and III studies.
Topics: Ankle; Ankle Joint; Arthroscopy; Humans; Joint Instability; Lateral Ligament, Ankle; Sutures
PubMed: 34252562
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.06.028 -
International Wound Journal Jan 2023Continuous sutures and interrupted sutures have been widely applied to skin closure after non-obstetric surgery or traumatic wounds. Usually, continuous sutures were... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Continuous sutures and interrupted sutures have been widely applied to skin closure after non-obstetric surgery or traumatic wounds. Usually, continuous sutures were divided into transdermal or subcuticular sutures according to whether the stitches were placed through or below the epidermal layer. Interrupted sutures, on the other hand, involved penetration of the loose connective tissue beneath the skin layers, with stitches placed through the external skin layer. Complications including infection, dehiscence, and poor cosmetic appearance were not rare after suturing. Whether a suture method is a suitable option for rapid wound healing and long-term cosmetic appearance remains controversial. To examine the potential benefits and harms of continuous skin sutures vs interrupted skin sutures in non-obstetric surgery or traumatic wounds. Searching websites such as PubMed, the Cochrane Central Library, Web of Science and Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched up to 5 January 2022 and were assessed and guided by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis rules as well as guidelines. All relevant randomised controlled studies comparing continuous sutures with interrupted sutures of skin closure were analysed. The suture techniques and material used in each trial were recorded. The transdermal and subcuticular continuous sutures were separately compared with interrupted sutures in the subgroup analysis of dehiscence and cosmetic appearance because the visual appearance of these two continuous suturing techniques was significantly different. Ten studies including 1181 participants were analysed. Subcuticular continuous sutures had comparatively higher visual analogue scale (VAS) scores among patients and doctors than interrupted sutures (OR = 0.27, 95% Confidence Intervals [CI] = 0. 07-0.47, P < .01). Similarly, priority was found regarding transdermal continuous sutures and interrupted sutures (OR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.21-0.60, P < .01). Five randomised controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrated relevant data about dehiscence events. The incidence of continuous suture was significantly lesser than that of interrupted suture (OR = 0.16, 95% CI = 0.07-0.37, P < .01). There was no significant difference between the infection events rates of two suture methods (OR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.40-1.21, P = .62, I = 0%). This systematic review indicated the superiority of both transdermal and subcutaneous continuous sutures over interrupted sutures in skin closure in terms of wound healing and cosmetic appearance.
Topics: Humans; Surgical Wound Infection; Suture Techniques; Wound Healing; Incidence; Sutures
PubMed: 35715955
DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13863 -
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics Sep 2020We conducted a systematic review of the published literature to assess the accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in establishing the presence of ramp lesions... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
We conducted a systematic review of the published literature to assess the accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in establishing the presence of ramp lesions (RLs) in Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) deficient knees and the clinical efficacy of the surgical repair of RLs.
METHODS
A comprehensive search of the MEDLINE, Web of Science and Scopus databases was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies assessing MRI diagnostic accuracy for RLs or the clinical effect of RL repair in participants with ACL injuries were included. Diagnostic accuracy measures were pooled and plotted in forest plots. Preoperative and at last follow-up treatment efficacy outcome measures were extracted and plotted in forest plots, for graphical comprehension.
RESULTS
Sixteen studies met the criteria and were included. The diagnostic analysis showed a pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios of 65.1% (95% CI, 59.73 to 70.42), 91.6% (95% CI, 89.14 to 94.05), 2.91 (95% CI, 2.38-3.55) and 0.53 (95% CI, 0.44-0.64), respectively, with high heterogeneity (I above 80%) for all measures. Treatment analysis showed improved Lysholm Knee Score, IKDC score and laxity difference between the knees in all studies after meniscal suture repair. A separate analysis showed no differences between repair of smaller, stable, RLs with meniscal sutures and repair with abrasion and trephination only.
CONCLUSION
Although the results present considerable heterogeneity, MRI seems to demonstrate moderate accuracy in the diagnosis of RLs in patients with ACL tear and the surgical repair of RLs can be associated with improved overall outcomes.
PubMed: 32978704
DOI: 10.1186/s40634-020-00287-x -
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Aug 2022Transosseous tunnel (TO) repair is considered the gold standard for patellar tendon rupture; however, suture anchor (SA) repair has emerged as a viable alternative in... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Transosseous tunnel (TO) repair is considered the gold standard for patellar tendon rupture; however, suture anchor (SA) repair has emerged as a viable alternative in recent years. Although both these techniques are used widely in clinical practice, the most biomechanically optimal construct for patellar tendon repair remains unknown.
PURPOSE
To examine published studies on the biomechanical properties of TO and SA fixation for patellar tendon repair in terms of ultimate load to failure and cyclic gap formation. The null hypothesis was that there would be no significant difference in either outcome measure between the groups.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review.
METHODS
A systematic review using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines was performed by searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify studies that analyzed the biomechanical properties of SA and TO techniques for repair of a ruptured patellar tendon. The search phrase implemented was "patellar tendon repair." Meta-analysis was performed to provide a quantitative comparison of the 2 techniques with regard to ultimate load to failure and cyclic gap displacement. Weighted averages were calculated for all quantitative outcomes, and outcomes were summarized in a forest plot. A random-effects model was used to account for the heterogeneity among the included studies in the final statistical analysis.
RESULTS
Of 875 studies initially screened, the inclusion criteria were met by 7 studies, including 128 cadaveric specimens (66 SA, 62 TO). The pooled analysis from 6 studies reporting on gap displacement revealed a statistically significant difference in favor of SA versus TO fixation ( < .001). Pooled analysis from 7 studies reporting on ultimate load to failure did not reveal a statistically significant difference between the use of SA and TO for tendon repair ( = .465).
CONCLUSION
Our systematic review revealed that the use of SA fixation for patellar tendon repair was associated with lower cyclic gap displacement when compared with TO fixation. There was no significant difference in ultimate load to failure between the repair techniques.
PubMed: 36035892
DOI: 10.1177/23259671221120212 -
The Lancet. Infectious Diseases Aug 2022WHO and the UK's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommend alcoholic chlorhexidine skin preparation and triclosan-coated sutures to prevent surgical... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Alcoholic chlorhexidine skin preparation or triclosan-coated sutures to reduce surgical site infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of high-quality randomised controlled trials.
BACKGROUND
WHO and the UK's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommend alcoholic chlorhexidine skin preparation and triclosan-coated sutures to prevent surgical site infections (SSIs). Existing meta-analyses that include studies at high risk of bias, combined with the recent publication of large, randomised trials, justify an updated meta-analysis of high-quality randomised controlled trials (RCTs). We aimed to test the rates of SSI according to skin preparation solutions (ie, alcoholic chlorhexidine vs aqueous povidone-iodine) and types of sutures (ie, coated vs uncoated).
METHODS
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, Pubmed, and Cochrane Library databases, with no language restrictions, to identify high-quality RCTs testing either alcoholic chlorhexidine skin preparation (vs aqueous povidone-iodine) or triclosan-coated sutures (vs uncoated sutures), or both, published from database inception to Sept 1, 2021. Patients who received clean-contaminated, contaminated, or dirty surgery were included. We predefined the characteristics of a high-quality trial through an expert consensus process to develop an enhanced Cochrane risk of bias-2 tool specifically for RCTs with a primary outcome of SSI. Data were extracted from published reports. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model and heterogeneity was assessed using the I statistic. This systematic review and meta-analysis was prospectively registered in PROSPERO, CRD42021267220.
FINDINGS
Of 942 studies identified, 933 were excluded. Four high-quality RCTs (n=7467 patients) were included that tested alcoholic chlorhexidine. No significant difference in SSI rates was noted between alcoholic chlorhexidine and aqueous povidone-iodine (17·9% [667 of 3723 patients] vs 19·8% [740 of 3744 patients]; odds ratio 0·84 [95% CI 0·65-1·06]; p=0·21, I=53·1%). Five high-quality RCTs were included that tested triclosan-coated sutures (n=8619 patients), with no significant difference noted between triclosan-coated and uncoated sutures (16·8% [733 of 4360 patients] vs 18·4% [784 of 4259 patients]; OR 0·90 [95% CI 0·74-1·09]; p=0·29, I=36·4%).
INTERPRETATION
Contrary to previous meta-analyses, this study did not show a benefit from either alcoholic chlorhexidine skin preparation or triclosan-coated sutures, both of which are more expensive than other readily available alternatives. Global and national guidance should be reconsidered to remove recommendations for their routine use.
FUNDING
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Global Health Research Unit.
Topics: Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Chlorhexidine; Humans; Povidone-Iodine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Surgical Wound Infection; Sutures; Triclosan
PubMed: 35644158
DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00133-5 -
Journal of Sport and Health Science Jan 2022The present study aimed to systematically review and compare 2 femoral autograft fixation techniques, namely, interference screws and suture anchors, for isolated medial... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
The present study aimed to systematically review and compare 2 femoral autograft fixation techniques, namely, interference screws and suture anchors, for isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability at mid- to long-term follow-up.
METHODS
A literature search was performed in September 2020. All studies reporting the outcomes of primary isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for recurrent patellofemoral instability were considered for inclusion. Only studies reporting the type of femoral autograft fixation under examination were considered. Studies reporting data from patients with elevated tibial tuberosity-tibial groove, patella alta, and/or Dejour's trochlear dysplasia types C and D, were not included. Only articles reporting data with a minimum follow-up period of 18 months were considered.
RESULTS
Data from 19 studies (615 patients) were retrieved. The overall age was 24.4 ± 6.7 years (mean ± SD). The mean follow-up was 46.5 ± 20.9 months. There were 76 patients in the anchor group and 539 in the screw group. Comparability was found with regard to age and follow-up duration between the 2 study groups. There was comparability between the Kujala, Lysholm, and Tegner scores at baseline. At the last follow-up, no worthy differences were found in terms of mean Kujala (+2.1%; p = 0.04), Lysholm (+1.7%; p = 0.05), and Tegner (+15.8%; p = 0.05) scores. Although complications occurred almost exclusively in the screw cohort, no statistically significant difference was found.
CONCLUSION
Femoral autograft fixation through interference screws or suture anchors report similar clinical scores and rate of apprehension test, persistent joint instability, re-dislocations, and revisions. These results must be interpreted within the limitations of the present study.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Bone Screws; Humans; Ligaments, Articular; Patellar Dislocation; Patellofemoral Joint; Suture Anchors; Young Adult
PubMed: 33259964
DOI: 10.1016/j.jshs.2020.11.011 -
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine May 2023Reconstruction is the gold standard treatment for medial ulnar collateral ligament (MUCL) injuries. However, recent studies show a successful and renewed interest in... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Reconstruction is the gold standard treatment for medial ulnar collateral ligament (MUCL) injuries. However, recent studies show a successful and renewed interest in direct suture repair, particularly in young athletes. Repair augmentation with a suture tape may provide greater stability, enabling healing of the MUCL while protecting the repair at higher valgus loads.
PURPOSE
To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on whether MUCL repair with augmentation provides a similar biomechanical profile to the traditional MUCL reconstruction.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review.
METHODS
The Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials, PubMed, Medline, and Embase were used to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) criteria with the following search terms: ("ulnar collateral ligament" OR "medial ulnar collateral ligament") AND ("internal brace" OR "augmentation" OR "suture tape"). Data pertaining to certain biomechanical properties (gap formation, failure to torque [ultimate load to failure], stiffness, degree of valgus opening, and modes of failure) were extracted. The pooled outcome data were analyzed by random- and fixed-effects models. A total of 203 abstracts were identified through the aforementioned databases.
RESULTS
After abstract and full-text screening, 6 biomechanical studies were included. All were on cadaveric elbows, with 53 repairs with augmentation and 53 reconstructions compared. There were no differences between the 2 in regard to ultimate load to failure (standard mean difference [SMD], -0.34 N·m; 95% CI, -1.36 to 0.68; = .51) and rotational stiffness (SMD, 0.26; 95% CI, -1.14 to 1.66; = .72). Despite a trend in resistance to gapping with augmented repair, this was not significant (SMD, -0.53; 95% CI, -1.08 to 0.01; = .06). Augmented repairs were more likely to fail by pullout or at the suture-tendon/anchor-suture interface (odds ratio [OR], 12.19; 95% CI, 4.17 to 35.62; < .00001), while failure by fracture was more common with reconstruction (OR, 5.75; 95% CI, 2.07 to 15.99; = .0008).
CONCLUSION
MUCL augmented repair establishes the required time-zero structural properties without the need for a tendon graft. However, future clinical studies are necessary to determine its true effectiveness as well as its success at higher levels of professional sport.
PubMed: 37152548
DOI: 10.1177/23259671231158373 -
Arthroplasty (London, England) Mar 2022This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to study surgical site infection of wound closure using staples versus sutures in elective knee and hip arthroplasties. (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to study surgical site infection of wound closure using staples versus sutures in elective knee and hip arthroplasties.
METHODS
A systematic literature review was performed to search for randomized controlled trials that compared surgical site infection after wound closure using staples versus sutures in elective knee and hip arthroplasties. The primary outcome was surgical site infection. The risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. The relative risk and 95% confidence interval with a random-effects model were assessed.
RESULTS
Eight studies were included in this study, including 2 studies with a low risk of bias, 4 studies having 'some concerns', and 2 studies with high risk of bias. Significant difference was not found in the risk of SSI for patients with staples (n = 557) versus sutures (n = 573) (RR: 1.70, 95% CI: 0.94-3.08, I = 16%). The results were similar after excluding the studies with a high risk of bias (RR: 1.67, 95% CI: 0.91-3.07, I = 32%). Analysis of studies with low risk of bias revealed a significantly higher risk of surgical site infection in patients with staples (n = 331) compared to sutures (n = 331) (RR: 2.56, 95% CI: 1.20-5.44, I = 0%). There was no difference between continuous and interrupted sutures (P > 0.05). In hip arthroplasty, stapling carried a significantly higher risk of surgical site infection than suturing (RR: 2.51, 95% CI: 1.15-5.50, I = 0%), but there was no significant difference in knee arthroplasty (RR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.33-2.25, I = 22%; P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Stapling might carry a higher risk of surgical site infection than suturing in elective knee and hip arthroplasties, especially in hip arthroplasty.
PubMed: 35241172
DOI: 10.1186/s42836-021-00110-7