-
Medicine Nov 2019This study aimed to assess the treatment effects of kyphoplasty (KP) compared with percutaneous vertebroplasty (VP) in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
Therapeutic effect of kyphoplasty and balloon vertebroplasty on osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
INTRODUCTION
This study aimed to assess the treatment effects of kyphoplasty (KP) compared with percutaneous vertebroplasty (VP) in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture, based on evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
METHODS
The electronic databases PubMed (from 1966), EmBase (from 1974), and Cochrane Library (including Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Reviews) were searched systematically to identify relevant studies published up to August 31, 2019. Meta-analyses were conducted for subjective pain as measured using visual analogue scale (VAS), disability function as measured by Oswestry disability index (ODI), and cement leakage. For VAS and ODI, mean change from the baseline and standard deviation were used; for cement leakage, numbers of events and patients in each group were used. The random-effects model was applied to summarize the effects across trials.
RESULTS
Previous reviews and meta-analysis included non-RCTs, which brought (for those studies) a higher risk of bias. Therefore, 6 RCTs involving 1077 patients were included in the meta-analysis. No between-group difference was found. The weighted mean difference was -0.19 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.39-0.01; P = .057) for VAS and -3.51 (95% CI, -8.70-1.67; P = .184) for ODI. However, KP had numerically lower rates of cement leakage across trials in a consistent fashion (relative risk, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74-0.94; P = .004).
CONCLUSIONS
Both KP and VP had clinically meaningful beneficial effects on pain and disability, and the effects were stable and similar. KP had significantly fewer cement leakages.
Topics: Female; Fractures, Compression; Humans; Kyphoplasty; Male; Osteoporotic Fractures; Pain Measurement; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome; Vertebroplasty
PubMed: 31702634
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017810 -
Brain & Spine 2023Mechanical complications from spinal fusion including implant loosening or junctional failure result in poor outcomes, particularly in osteoporotic patients. While the... (Review)
Review
INTODUCTION
Mechanical complications from spinal fusion including implant loosening or junctional failure result in poor outcomes, particularly in osteoporotic patients. While the use of percutaneous vertebral augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) has been studied for augmentation of junctional levels to offset against kyphosis and failure, its deployment around existing loose screws or in failing surrounding bone as a salvage percutaneous procedure has been described in small case series and merits review.
RESEARCH QUESTION
How effective and safe is the use of PMMA as a salvage procedure for mechanical complications in failed spinal fusion?.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Systematic search of online databases for clinical studies using this technique.
RESULTS
11 studies were identified, only consisting of two case reports and nine case series. Consistent improvements were observed in pre- to post-operative VAS and with sustained improvements at final follow-up. The extra- or para-pedicular approach was the most frequent access trajectory. Most studies cited difficulties with visibility on fluoroscopy, using navigation or oblique views as a solution for this.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
Percutaneous cementation at a failing screw-bone interface stabilises further micromotion with reductions in back pain. This rarely used technique is manifested by a low but increasing number of reported cases. The technique warrants further evaluation and is best performed within a multidisciplinary setting at a specialist centre. Notwithstanding that underlying pathology may not be addressed, awareness of this technique may allow an effective and safe salvage solution with minimal morbidity for older sicker patients.
PubMed: 37383448
DOI: 10.1016/j.bas.2023.101726 -
European Review For Medical and... Dec 2020The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis analyzing the efficacy of zoledronic acid in improving outcomes with percutaneous... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Efficacy of zoledronic acid with percutaneous kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis analyzing the efficacy of zoledronic acid in improving outcomes with percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) surgeries for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We electronically searched the databases of PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, CENTRAL, and Google Scholar up to 15th September 2020. All types of studies assessing the use of zoledronic acid with PKP/PVP surgeries were included.
RESULTS
Seven studies were included. On meta-analysis of data from five studies reporting bone mineral density (BMD) as g/cm2, we found a statistically significant increase in BMD in the zoledronic group (MD: 0.14; 95% CI: 0.07, 0.21, I2=97%; p<0.001). On pooled analysis of two studies reporting T scores, a similar result in favour of the zoledronic acid group was noted (MD: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.23, 0.98, I2=76%; p=0.002). We also found a statistically significant reduction in pain scores (MD: -1.23; 95% CI: -1.59, -0.86, I2=97%; p<0.00001), ODI scores (MD: -9.54; 95% CI: -12.76, -6.31, I2=95%; p<0.00001) and serum type I procollagen peptide (CTX) levels (MD: -0.19; 95% CI: -0.25, -0.12, I2=98%; p<0.00001) with zoledronic acid as compared to control. Our analysis also found a significantly reduced risk of further vertebral fractures in patients receiving zoledronic acid as compared to control (RR: 0.17; 95% CI: 0.07, 0.39, I2=0%; p<0.00001).
CONCLUSIONS
Our review indicates that the use of once-yearly zoledronic acid in the peri-operative period of PVP/PKP procedures for patients with OVCF leads to significant improvement of BMD, reduced pain scores, better ODI scores, and reduced incidence of further vertebral fractures. Our results have clinical significance as it encourages the use of zoledronic acid for such patients for better clinical outcomes.
Topics: Combined Modality Therapy; Humans; Osteoporotic Fractures; Treatment Outcome; Vertebroplasty; Zoledronic Acid
PubMed: 33336756
DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202012_24030 -
Zeitschrift Fur Orthopadie Und... Dec 2023To summarize the literature and compare the advantages and disadvantages of the unilateral transverse process-pedicle approach (UTPA) and conventional transpedicular... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
To summarize the literature and compare the advantages and disadvantages of the unilateral transverse process-pedicle approach (UTPA) and conventional transpedicular approach (CTPA) vertebral augmentation in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF).
METHODS
A single researcher performed a systematic literature review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Online scientific databases were searched in September 2021 for English- and Chinese-language publications. A series of comparative studies were included, with UTPA as the main intervention and CTPA as the comparison indicator. A meta-analysis was performed for studies that reported clinical outcome indicators. The χ was used to study heterogeneity between trials, and the I statistic was calculated to estimate variation across studies.
RESULTS
A total of eight studies were included for meta-analysis, all of which were observational studies with mixed bias risk. There were 613 subjects in the UTPA group and 488 subjects in the CTPA group. The results of the meta-analysis showed that there was no difference between the UTPA group and the CTPA group in terms of visual analogue scale scores (p = 0.31), Oswestry Disability Index scores (p = 0.50), correction of kyphosis angle (p = 0.65), and the amount of bone cement (p = 0.13), but the UTPA group had a shorter operative time (p < 0.001), bone cement leakage rates (p = 0.02), and fluoroscopy times than the CTPA group (p < 0.001). Partial analysis results had a high risk of bias, and the most common source of bias was that there was high heterogeneity between studies, and the sensitivity can only be reduced by a random effect model, and some studies (four items) did not clearly describe the confounders that they controlled.
CONCLUSION
The limited evidence obtained in this study proves that the new puncture method does not have more advantages than the traditional technique, so it is no longer meaningful to continue to obsess over the impact of the puncture method on surgical outcome.
Topics: Humans; Kyphoplasty; Spinal Fractures; Fractures, Compression; Bone Cements; Spine; Vertebroplasty; Osteoporotic Fractures; Treatment Outcome; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 35378564
DOI: 10.1055/a-1785-5698 -
Global Spine Journal Jun 2024Systematic review and meta-analysis. (Review)
Review
Mechanical Vertebral Body Augmentation Versus Conventional Balloon Kyphoplasty for Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Compression Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVE
Surgical management of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) has traditionally consisted of vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty procedures. Mechanical percutaneous vertebral body augmentation (MPVA) systems have recently been introduced as alternatives to traditional methods. However, the effectiveness of MPVA systems vs conventional augmentation techniques for OVCFs remains unclear. This serves as the premise for this study.
METHODS
A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted as per the guidelines. Studies of interest included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which directly compared patient outcomes following kyphoplasty to patients treated with MPVA systems. Clinical and radiological findings were collated and compared for significance between cohorts.
RESULTS
6 RCTs were identified with 1024 patients total. The mean age of all patients was 73.5 years. 17% of the cohort were male, 83% were female. 515 patients underwent kyphoplasty and 509 underwent mechanical vertebral body augmentation using MPVA systems. MPVAs showed similar efficacy for restoration of vertebral body height ( = .18), total complications ( = .36), cement extravasation ( = .58) and device-related complications ( = .06). MPVAs also showed reduced rates of all new fractures (16.4% vs 22.2%; = .17) and adjacent fractures (14.7% vs 18.9%; = .23), with improved visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at 6-month ( = .13).
CONCLUSION
The results of this meta-analysis highlight no significant improvement in clinical or radiological outcomes for MPVA systems when compared to balloon kyphoplasty for vertebral body augmentation. Further research is needed to establish a true benefit over traditional operative methods.
PubMed: 38889443
DOI: 10.1177/21925682241261988 -
Medicine Apr 2021The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical efficacy of zoledronic acid (ZOL) in the treatment and prevention of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Clinical efficacy of zoledronic acid combined with percutaneous kyphoplasty in the prevention and treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVE:
The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical efficacy of zoledronic acid (ZOL) in the treatment and prevention of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) after percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) for elderly patients.
METHODS:
The PubMed, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, VIP, and Embase were investigated through June 2020. All randomized controlled trials (RCT) involving ZOL injections for OVCF were enrolled. Outcome indicators included the bone mineral density (BMD), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), recompression vertebral fracture (RVF), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and bone metabolism (Procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide [PINP] and βcross-linked C-telopeptide of type I collagen [β-CTX]), bone cement leakage. Review Manager 5.3 was used to analyze these indicators.
RESULTS:
In this study, (1).. Eight studies had met the eligibility criteria, a total of 578 participants were involved (285 and 293 in the experimental (ZOL) group and control [no ZOL] group, respectively). (2).. The BMD scores of patients with OVCF in the experimental group were significantly higher than that in the control group ( < .05). The VAS scores were significantly different between the 2 groups at the 6, 12 months follow-up ( < .05). After PKP operation, ZOL injections reduced the rate of RVF ( < .05). In the comparison of ODI scores, the experimental group improved compared with the control group ( < .05). Respectively, the bone metabolism of patients with OVCF after ZOL was better than that of patients in control group ( < .05).
CONCLUSION:
Zoledronic acid had a significant effect on the treatment and prevention of OVCF in elderly osteoporotic patients after PKP. Due to the limited quality and data, more high-quality studies are needed to confirm the results of this meta-analysis.
Topics: Bone Density Conservation Agents; Humans; Kyphoplasty; Osteoporotic Fractures; Spinal Fractures; Zoledronic Acid
PubMed: 33787604
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025215 -
Pain Physician May 2021Percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) has been reported to provide a favorable analgesic effect for pain caused by osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs)....
BACKGROUND
Percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) has been reported to provide a favorable analgesic effect for pain caused by osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). However, a systematic review demonstrated that pain relief was only reported for approximately 86% of kyphoplasty treatments.
OBJECTIVES
To explore whether an additional facet joint block (FJB) can minimize pain and improve the clinical outcome of PKP in patients with acute OVCFs.
STUDY DESIGN
Prospective study.
SETTING
All data were from Honghui Hospital in Xi'an.
METHODS
According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 194 patients were eventually included in our study; they were randomly divided into 2 groups of 97 patients each and treated with either PKP + FJB or PKP alone. Follow-up consultations were scheduled 1 day, 3 days, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year postoperatively; the demographic characteristics, related surgical information, and complications observed within both groups were recorded. The clinical evaluation parameters included the intraoperative satisfaction score, the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).
RESULTS
A total of 171 patients (61 men and 110 women; age range: 62-85 years) completed the full postoperative follow-up schedule, with 83 patients in the PKP + FJB group and 88 in the PKP group. No significant differences were observed in the genders, ages, preoperative bone mineral density, surgical levels, or volume of cement injected between the 2 groups (P > 0.05, respectively). The average duration of the surgeries in the PKP + FJB group was slightly longer than that in the PKP group (35.5 ± 4.8 min vs. 31.8 ± 4.3 min; P = 0.038), and in terms of the clinical outcomes, the average intraoperative satisfaction score was significantly higher in the PKP + FJB group (8.6 ± 1.1 vs. 6.3 ± 1.3; P < 0.001). Compared with the preoperative data, significant improvements in the VAS scores of back pain and ODI were observed at each follow-up interval (P < 0.05, respectively). These scores were significantly higher in the PKP + FJB group than in the PKP group; however, this was only observed within the first month after the procedure.
LIMITATIONS
A single-center noncontrol study.
CONCLUSIONS
The addition of an FJB (which in our study involved a unique combination of ropivacaine, prednisolone, and vitamin B12) improved the short-term clinical outcome of PKP for acute OVCFs. The local anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects on the facet joints resulted in higher intraoperative satisfaction and lower VAS and ODI scores for the first postoperative month when compared with the PKP group.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bone Cements; Female; Fractures, Compression; Humans; Kyphoplasty; Male; Middle Aged; Osteoporotic Fractures; Prospective Studies; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Retrospective Studies; Spinal Fractures; Treatment Outcome; Zygapophyseal Joint
PubMed: 33988948
DOI: No ID Found -
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and... Sep 2020A systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the pros and cons of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) versus kyphoplasty (PKP) for osteoporotic vertebral compression... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
A systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the pros and cons of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) versus kyphoplasty (PKP) for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) with intravertebral cleft (IVC) including all available evidence from controlled trials.
METHODS
Databases including Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang Data were searched to identify relevant studies comparing PVP and PKP for OVCFs with IVC. The outcomes mainly included visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), local kyphotic angle (LKA), rate of vertebral height (VH%), and adverse events.
RESULTS
Nine studies enrolling 688 patients were eligible for meta-analysis. The results indicated no significant differences between the two groups in the short-and long-term VAS, ODI, LKA, or VH% (P > 0.05). Compared with PVP, PKP was associated with significantly longer operation time (P < 0.05), higher cost (P > 0.05), and more injected cement volume (P < 0.05). In terms of adverse events, PKP has a lower risk of cement leakage (P < 0.05), while with no significant difference in adjacent-level fracture rates (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION
The two procedures have similar short- and long-term pain relief, functional recovery, local kyphosis correction, and vertebral height maintenance in OVCFs with IVC. PKP is superior to PVP for the injected cement volume, and lower cement leakage rate, however, with longer operation time, more fluoroscopy times, and higher cost. Further randomized controlled trials (RCTs) should be conducted to confirm these results.
Topics: Bone Cements; Endoleak; Female; Fluoroscopy; Fractures, Compression; Humans; Kyphoplasty; Male; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures; Operative Time; Osteoporotic Fractures; Pain Management; Pain Measurement; Recovery of Function; Spinal Fractures; Treatment Outcome; Vertebroplasty
PubMed: 32912267
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-01938-6 -
Global Spine Journal Jul 2022Systematic review.
Instrumentation Techniques to Prevent Proximal Junctional Kyphosis and Proximal Junctional Failure in Adult Spinal Deformity Correction: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review.
OBJECTIVES
To summarize the results of clinical studies investigating spinal instrumentation techniques aiming to reduce the postoperative incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and/or failure (PJF) in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients.
METHODS
EMBASE and Medline® were searched for articles dating from January 2000 onward. Data was extracted by 2 independent authors and methodological quality was assessed using ROBINS-I.
RESULTS
18 retrospective- and prospective cohort studies with a severe or critical risk of bias were included. Different techniques were applied at the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV): tethers in various configurations, 2-level prophylactic vertebroplasty (2-PVP), transverse process hooks (TPH), flexible rods (FR), sublaminar tapes (ST) and multilevel stabilization screws (MLSS). Compared to a pedicle screw (PS) group, significant differences in PJK incidence were found using tethers in various configurations (18% versus 45%, = 0.001, 15% versus 38%, = 0.045), 2-PVP (24% vs 36%, = 0.020), TPH (0% vs. 30%, = 0.023) and FR (15% versus 38%, = 0.045). Differences in revision rates for PJK were found in studies concerning tethers (4% versus 18%, = 0.002), 2-PVP (0% vs 13%, = 0.031) and TPH (0% vs 7%, = n.a.).
CONCLUSION
Although the studies are of low quality, the most frequently studied techniques, namely 2-PVP as anterior reinforcement and (tensioned) tethers or TPH as posterior semi-rigid fixation, show promising results. To provide a reliable comparison, more controlled studies need to be performed, including the use of clinical outcome measures and a uniform definition of PJF.
PubMed: 34325554
DOI: 10.1177/21925682211034500 -
Annals of Palliative Medicine Nov 2021Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) are common vertebral augmentation (VA) procedures for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) are common vertebral augmentation (VA) procedures for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF), each with their own advantages and disadvantages. In recent years, the development of new implant-assisted technologies has provided a breakthrough in VA. This study systematically evaluated and meta-analyzed the reports on new implant-assisted VA techniques in recent years, so as to provide evidence for clinical diagnosis and treatment.
METHODS
The PubMed, Embase, Ovid, and SpringerLink databases were searched for randomized controlled studies on VA in the treatment of OVCF. In this study, patients in the experimental group were treated with PVP using the new implant-assisted VA technique, while patients in the control group were treated with PKP. Bias assessment was conducted using the tool integrated with the Revman 5.4 software, and meta-analysis was carried out to compare the mid-term postoperative pain relief, functional status, quality of life, and cement extravasation between the two groups (each presented with a forest plot).
RESULTS
Eight articles were finally included in the selection, involving a total of 1,027 patients. PVP surgery using the new implant-assisted VA technique was superior to PKP surgery in relieving postoperative pain [mean difference (MD) =-3.77, 95% CI: -5.63, -1.92, P<0.0001] and improving the postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score (MD =-1.59, 95% CI: -3.01, -0.16, P=0.03). However, it was not significantly different from PKP surgery in improving postoperative quality of life (MD =-0.27, 95% CI: -3.55, 3.01, P=0.87), and the cement extravasation rate was significantly lower than that of PKP surgery [odd ratio (OR) =0.38, 95% CI: 0.19, 0.74, P=0.004].
DISCUSSION
The new implant-assisted VA technique can significantly relieve pain, reduce clinical symptoms, improve postoperative quality of life, and significantly reduce the problem of cement extravasation. However, this new technology is still evolving, and more high-quality randomized controlled studies on this topic are needed to provide stronger evidence.
Topics: Fractures, Compression; Humans; Pain, Postoperative; Quality of Life; Spinal Fractures; Vertebroplasty
PubMed: 34872301
DOI: 10.21037/apm-21-2834