-
Clinical Oral Investigations Mar 2022To determine whether the midface of patients with Muenke syndrome, Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, or TCF12-related craniosynostosis is hypoplastic compared to skeletal facial...
OBJECTIVES
To determine whether the midface of patients with Muenke syndrome, Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, or TCF12-related craniosynostosis is hypoplastic compared to skeletal facial proportions of a Dutch control group.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
We included seventy-four patients (43 patients with Muenke syndrome, 22 patients with Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, and 9 patients with TCF12-related craniosynostosis) who were referred between 1990 and 2020 (age range 4.84 to 16.83 years) and were treated at the Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Special Dental Care and Orthodontics, Children's Hospital Erasmus University Medical Center, Sophia, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. The control group consisted of 208 healthy children.
RESULTS
Cephalometric values comprising the midface were decreased in Muenke syndrome (ANB: β = -1.87, p = 0.001; and PC1: p < 0,001), Saethre-Chotzen syndrome (ANB: β = -1.76, p = 0.001; and PC1: p < 0.001), and TCF12-related craniosynostosis (ANB: β = -1.70, p = 0.015; and PC1: p < 0.033).
CONCLUSIONS
In this study, we showed that the midface is hypoplastic in Muenke syndrome, Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, and TCF12-related craniosynostosis compared to the Dutch control group. Furthermore, the rotation of the maxilla and the typical craniofacial buildup is significantly different in these three craniosynostosis syndromes compared to the controls.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
The maxillary growth in patients with Muenke syndrome, Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, or TCF12-related craniosynostosis is impaired, leading to a deviant dental development. Therefore, timely orthodontic follow-up is recommended. In order to increase expertise and support treatment planning by medical and dental specialists for these patients, and also because of the specific differences between the syndromes, we recommend the management of patients with Muenke syndrome, Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, or TCF12-related craniosynostosis in specialized multidisciplinary teams.
Topics: Acrocephalosyndactylia; Adolescent; Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors; Cephalometry; Child; Child, Preschool; Craniosynostoses; Humans; Syndrome
PubMed: 34904178
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-04275-y -
In Vivo (Athens, Greece) 2023Craniosynostosis refers to the early fusion of one or many cranial sutures, causing craniofacial abnormalities observed in 1:2,500 births worldwide. In most cases (85%),... (Review)
Review
Craniosynostosis refers to the early fusion of one or many cranial sutures, causing craniofacial abnormalities observed in 1:2,500 births worldwide. In most cases (85%), craniosynostosis is presented as sporadic anomaly (non-syndromic craniosynostosis), while in other cases (15%) as part of syndromes (syndromic craniosynostosis). Patients with syndromic disorder usually have more severe symptoms compared to those with single suture synostosis. Most common syndromes of craniosynostosis include Pfeiffer, Apert, Crouzon, Jackson-Weiss, Muenke and Boston type MSX2-related syndrome. The main gene mutations in craniosynostosis involve FGFR1, FGFR2, FGFR3, TWIST1 and MSX2, which encode key factors influencing cranial bone morphogenesis. The main therapeutic approaches are surgical as discussed in this review, and the type of therapy depends on the graveness of the incident.
Topics: Humans; Craniosynostoses; Skull; Mutation; Syndrome
PubMed: 36593018
DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13052 -
The Pan African Medical Journal 2023
Topics: Humans; Acrocephalosyndactylia; Syndactyly; Fingers; Toes
PubMed: 37521759
DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2023.45.24.38946 -
Scientific Reports Apr 2022This meta-analysis aims to compare Apert syndrome (AS) patients with non-AS populations (not clinically or genetically diagnosed) on craniofacial cephalometric... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
This meta-analysis aims to compare Apert syndrome (AS) patients with non-AS populations (not clinically or genetically diagnosed) on craniofacial cephalometric characteristics (CCC) to combine publicly available scientific information while also improving the validity of primary study findings. A comprehensive search was performed in the following databases: PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, Medline, and Web of Science, an article published between 1st January 2000 to October 17th, 2021. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed to carry out this systematic review. We used the PECO system to classify people with AS based on whether or not they had distinctive CCC compared to the non-AS population. Following are some examples of how PECO has been used: People with AS are labeled P; clinical or genetic diagnosis of AS is labeled E; individuals without AS are labeled C; CCC of AS are labeled O. Using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality-Assessment-Scale, independent reviewers assessed the articles' methodological quality and extracted data. 13 studies were included in the systematic review. 8 out of 13 studies were score 7-8 in NOS scale, which indicated that most of the studies were medium to high qualities. Six case-control studies were analyzed for meta-analysis. Due to the wide range of variability in CCC, we were only able to include data from at least three previous studies. There was a statistically significant difference in N-S-PP (I: 76.56%; P = 0.014; CI 1.27 to - 0.28) and Greater wing angle (I: 79.07%; P = 0.008; CI 3.07-1.17) between AS and control subjects. Cleft palate, anterior open bite, crowding in the upper jaw, and hypodontia occurred more frequently among AS patients. Significant shortening of the mandibular width, height and length is the most reported feature in AS patients. CT scans can help patients with AS decide whether to pursue orthodontic treatment alone or to have their mouth surgically expanded. The role of well-informed orthodontic and maxillofacial practitioners is critical in preventing and rehabilitating oral health issues.
Topics: Acrocephalosyndactylia; Cephalometry; Cleft Palate; Humans; Research Report
PubMed: 35383244
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-09764-y -
Monaldi Archives For Chest Disease =... Apr 2021Dear Editor, We read with much excitement in the article "Takotsubo syndrome and pheochromocytoma: an insidious combination" published by Maffé et al. in your esteemed...
Dear Editor, We read with much excitement in the article "Takotsubo syndrome and pheochromocytoma: an insidious combination" published by Maffé et al. in your esteemed journal...
Topics: Adrenal Gland Neoplasms; Humans; Pheochromocytoma; Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy
PubMed: 33840185
DOI: 10.4081/monaldi.2021.1859 -
Surgical Neurology International 2020Apert syndrome is one of the most severe craniofacial disorders. This study aims to describe the craniofacial surgeries and central nervous system malformations of a...
BACKGROUND
Apert syndrome is one of the most severe craniofacial disorders. This study aims to describe the craniofacial surgeries and central nervous system malformations of a cohort of children with Apert syndrome treated in the past 20 years and to compare these data with previously published data.
METHODS
Retrospective analysis of a series of patients with Apert syndrome treated between 1999 and 2019 in our hospital. Information was analyzed regarding craniofacial procedures, hydrocephalus and presence of shunts, Chiari malformation Type 1, and other brain malformations such as corpus callosum and septum pellucidum anomalies.
RESULTS
Thirty-seven patients were studied. Ventriculoperitoneal shunt prevalence was 24.3%, and 8.1% of patients required decompressive surgery for Chiari malformation. All of them needed at least one cranial vault remodeling procedure. The median age for this procedure was 8 months. In 69.7% of patients, the first cranial vault intervention was performed in the fronto-orbital region. In 36.4% of patients, a midface advancement had been performed at the time of this review, although this proportion was very dependent on the follow-up period and the age of the patients. The median age for the midface advancement procedure was 5.25 years. Anomalies of the corpus callosum and the septum pellucidum were reported in 43.2% and 59.5% of patients, respectively.
CONCLUSION
Apert syndrome is a type of syndromic craniosynostosis, and patients usually require one or more cranial and facial surgeries. In comparison with other syndromic craniosynostosis types, Apert syndrome less frequently requires a VP shunt or treatment for a Chiari malformation.
PubMed: 33194294
DOI: 10.25259/SNI_413_2020 -
Clinical Case Reports Feb 2023Apert syndrome presents similarly to the one we presented in this image, and a genetic study is used for confirmation. This image shows the typical findings of physical...
Apert syndrome presents similarly to the one we presented in this image, and a genetic study is used for confirmation. This image shows the typical findings of physical examination, so that if this appears in the outpatient department, the diagnosis of Apert syndrome should be assumed.
PubMed: 36789310
DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.6941 -
Pediatric Reports Dec 2019Apert syndrome or acrocephalosyndactyly is a rare genetic disease characterized by craniofacial dysmorphism and syndactyly of the hands and feet. We report an...
Apert syndrome or acrocephalosyndactyly is a rare genetic disease characterized by craniofacial dysmorphism and syndactyly of the hands and feet. We report an observation in a 4-month-old female infant, whose father was 65 years old. The infant was admitted to the neonatology of Sourô Sanou University Hospital (Burkina Faso) for respiratory distress in a congenital malformation disorders context with the notion of resuscitation for 10 minutes at birth. Her clinical examination revealed a craniofacial dysmorphism, syndactyly, choanal atresia, a cleft palate and a retardation of the psychomotor development. The paraclinical assessment consisted of a radiograph of the skeleton and a cerebral tomodensitometry confirming bicoronal synostosis and bone syndactyly; an abdominopelvic, cardiac ultrasound didn't reveal any abnormalities; toxoplasmic serology was negative and rubella serology positive. The association of Apert syndrome with positive rubella serology seems fortuitous. Also, the association of choanal atresia and cleft palate has not commonly been reported in Apert syndrome. In the absence of surgical the infant has been followed until 9 months with therapeutic prospects.
PubMed: 31871604
DOI: 10.4081/pr.2019.8224 -
European Journal of Orthodontics May 2022To determine whether dental maturity (dental development) was delayed in patients with Muenke syndrome, Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, and TCF12-related craniosynostosis,...
OBJECTIVES
To determine whether dental maturity (dental development) was delayed in patients with Muenke syndrome, Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, and TCF12-related craniosynostosis, compared with a Dutch control group without syndromes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This study included 60 patients (38 patients with Muenke syndrome, 17 patients with Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, and 5 with TCF12-related craniosynostosis), aged 5.8-16.8 years that were treated at the Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Special Dental Care, and Orthodontics, in Sophia Children's Hospital, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Dental age was calculated according to Demirjian's index of dental maturity. The control group included 451 children without a syndrome.
RESULTS
Compared with the control group, dental development was delayed by an average of one year in 5- to 8-year-old patients with Muenke syndrome (P = 0.007) and in 8- to 10-year-old patients with Saethre-Chotzen syndrome (P = 0.044), but not in patients with TCF12-related craniosynostosis.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results indicated that dental development was delayed by one year, on average, in patients with Muenke syndrome and Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, compared with a Dutch control group without syndromes.
IMPLICATIONS
Our findings have improved the understanding of dental development in patients with Muenke and Saethre-Chotzen syndrome. These results can provide guidance on whether the orthodontist needs to consider growth disturbances related to dental development.
Topics: Acrocephalosyndactylia; Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors; Child; Child, Preschool; Craniosynostoses; Humans; Netherlands; Syndrome
PubMed: 34424951
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjab056 -
Bone Reports Jun 2022Faciocraniosynostoses (FCS) are malformations affecting the development of the bones of the skull and face, due to the premature closure of one or more craniofacial...
OBJECTIVE
Faciocraniosynostoses (FCS) are malformations affecting the development of the bones of the skull and face, due to the premature closure of one or more craniofacial sutures, mostly secondary to activating () 1-3 mutations. Gain-of-function mutations are also responsible for various conditions referred to as osteochondrodysplasia (OCD), characterized by structural and functional abnormalities of growth plate cartilages. We hypothesized that patients with -related faciocraniosynostoses may present extra-cranial growth anomalies.
STUDY DESIGN
We retrospectively collected height and weight data from a cohort of 70 patients. Included patients were admitted for -related FCS between 2000 and 2021 at the Craniofacial Unit of Necker - Enfants Malades University Hospital in Paris, France.
RESULTS
We showed that -related faciocraniosynostoses had significantly reduced heights and weights relative to controls, and that two specific time periods (1-3 years and > 8 years of age) were associated with lower height and weight values. Four patients had received growth hormone treatment but remained below normal values for growth in height and weight.
CONCLUSIONS
Patients with -related faciocraniosynostoses have clinically significant extra-cranial anomalies which are not currently investigated and managed in usual protocols; these patients could benefit from a systematic pre-pubertal endocrine assessment. More generally, our results extend the scope of extracranial anomalies in -related faciocraniosynostoses and support the hypothesis that all conditions with activating mutations affect both membranous ossification and long bones.
PubMed: 35372644
DOI: 10.1016/j.bonr.2022.101524