-
Genes Jun 2023Cells are constantly assaulted by endogenous and exogenous sources of DNA damage that threaten genome stability [...].
Cells are constantly assaulted by endogenous and exogenous sources of DNA damage that threaten genome stability [...].
Topics: Humans; DNA Repair; DNA Damage; Genomic Instability
PubMed: 37510290
DOI: 10.3390/genes14071385 -
DNA Repair Aug 2023Cells have evolved an arsenal of molecular mechanisms to respond to continuous alterations in the primary structure of DNA. At the cellular level, DNA damage response... (Review)
Review
Cells have evolved an arsenal of molecular mechanisms to respond to continuous alterations in the primary structure of DNA. At the cellular level, DNA damage response proteins accumulate at sites of DNA damage and organize into nuclear foci. As recounted by Errol Friedberg, pioneering work on DNA repair in the 1930 s was stimulated by collaborations between physicists and geneticists. In recent years, the introduction of ideas from physics on self-organizing compartments has taken the field of cell biology by storm. Percolation and phase separation theories are increasingly used to model the self-assembly of compartments, called biomolecular condensates, that selectively concentrate molecules without a surrounding membrane. In this review, we discuss these concepts in the context of the DNA damage response. We discuss how studies of DNA repair foci as condensates can link molecular mechanisms with cell physiological functions, provide new insights into regulatory mechanisms, and open new perspectives for targeting DNA damage responses for therapeutic purposes.
Topics: Proteins; Cell Nucleus; DNA Damage; DNA Repair
PubMed: 37320957
DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2023.103524 -
International Journal of Molecular... Feb 2023It is well known that ionizing radiation, when it hits living cells, causes a plethora of different damage types at different levels [...].
It is well known that ionizing radiation, when it hits living cells, causes a plethora of different damage types at different levels [...].
Topics: DNA Damage; Radiation, Ionizing
PubMed: 36834649
DOI: 10.3390/ijms24043238 -
International Journal of Molecular... Sep 2019Nickel (Ni) is known to be a major carcinogenic heavy metal. Occupational and environmental exposure to Ni has been implicated in human lung and nasal cancers.... (Review)
Review
Nickel (Ni) is known to be a major carcinogenic heavy metal. Occupational and environmental exposure to Ni has been implicated in human lung and nasal cancers. Currently, the molecular mechanisms of Ni carcinogenicity remain unclear, but studies have shown that Ni-caused DNA damage is an important carcinogenic mechanism. Therefore, we conducted a literature search of DNA damage associated with Ni exposure and summarized known Ni-caused DNA damage effects. In vitro and vivo studies demonstrated that Ni can induce DNA damage through direct DNA binding and reactive oxygen species (ROS) stimulation. Ni can also repress the DNA damage repair systems, including direct reversal, nucleotide repair (NER), base excision repair (BER), mismatch repair (MMR), homologous-recombination repair (HR), and nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) repair pathways. The repression of DNA repair is through direct enzyme inhibition and the downregulation of DNA repair molecule expression. Up to now, the exact mechanisms of DNA damage caused by Ni and Ni compounds remain unclear. Revealing the mechanisms of DNA damage from Ni exposure may contribute to the development of preventive strategies in Ni carcinogenicity.
Topics: Animals; Carcinogenesis; DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded; DNA Damage; DNA Mismatch Repair; DNA Repair; Humans; Nickel; Reactive Oxygen Species
PubMed: 31546657
DOI: 10.3390/ijms20194690 -
Biochemical Pharmacology Sep 2019Mitosis ensures accurate segregation of duplicated DNA through tight regulation of chromosome condensation, bipolar spindle assembly, chromosome alignment in the... (Review)
Review
Mitosis ensures accurate segregation of duplicated DNA through tight regulation of chromosome condensation, bipolar spindle assembly, chromosome alignment in the metaphase plate, chromosome segregation and cytokinesis. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARPs), in particular PARP1, PARP2, PARP3, PARP5a (TNKS1), as well as poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase (PARG), regulate different mitotic functions, including centrosome function, mitotic spindle assembly, mitotic checkpoints, telomere length and telomere cohesion. PARP depletion or inhibition give rise to various mitotic defects such as centrosome amplification, multipolar spindles, chromosome misalignment, premature loss of cohesion, metaphase arrest, anaphase DNA bridges, lagging chromosomes, and micronuclei. As the mechanisms of PARP1/2 inhibitor-mediated cell death are being progressively elucidated, it is becoming clear that mitotic defects caused by PARP1/2 inhibition arise due to replication stress and DNA damage in S phase. As it stands, entrapment of inactive PARP1/2 on DNA phenocopies replication stress through accumulation of unresolved replication intermediates, double-stranded DNA breaks (DSBs) and incorrectly repaired DSBs, which can be transmitted from S phase to mitosis and instigate various mitotic defects, giving rise to both numerical and structural chromosomal aberrations. Cancer cells have increased levels of replication stress, which makes them particularly susceptible to a combination of agents that compromise replication fork stability. Indeed, combining PARP1/2 inhibitors with genetic deficiencies in DNA repair pathways, DNA-damaging agents, ATR and other cell cycle checkpoint inhibitors has yielded synergistic effects in killing cancer cells. Here I provide a comprehensive overview of the mitotic functions of PARPs and PARG, mitotic phenotypes induced by their depletion or inhibition, as well as the therapeutic relevance of targeting mitotic cells by directly interfering with mitotic functions or indirectly through replication stress.
Topics: Animals; DNA Damage; DNA Repair; Humans; Mitosis; Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases
PubMed: 30910692
DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2019.03.028 -
Genes Jan 2024DNA-protein crosslinks (DPCs) represent a unique and complex form of DNA damage formed by covalent attachment of proteins to DNA. DPCs are formed through a variety of... (Review)
Review
DNA-protein crosslinks (DPCs) represent a unique and complex form of DNA damage formed by covalent attachment of proteins to DNA. DPCs are formed through a variety of mechanisms and can significantly impede essential cellular processes such as transcription and replication. For this reason, anti-cancer drugs that form DPCs have proven effective in cancer therapy. While cells rely on numerous different processes to remove DPCs, the molecular mechanisms responsible for orchestrating these processes remain obscure. Having this insight could potentially be harnessed therapeutically to improve clinical outcomes in the battle against cancer. In this review, we describe the ways cells enzymatically process DPCs. These processing events include direct reversal of the DPC via hydrolysis, nuclease digestion of the DNA backbone to delete the DPC and surrounding DNA, proteolytic processing of the crosslinked protein, as well as covalent modification of the DNA-crosslinked proteins with ubiquitin, SUMO, and Poly(ADP) Ribose (PAR).
Topics: Ubiquitin; DNA Damage; Endonucleases; Hydrolysis; Proteolysis
PubMed: 38254974
DOI: 10.3390/genes15010085 -
Nature Communications Sep 2023The SUMO protease SENP6 maintains genomic stability, but mechanistic understanding of this process remains limited. We find that SENP6 deconjugates SUMO2/3 polymers on a...
The SUMO protease SENP6 maintains genomic stability, but mechanistic understanding of this process remains limited. We find that SENP6 deconjugates SUMO2/3 polymers on a group of DNA damage response proteins, including BRCA1-BARD1, 53BP1, BLM and ERCC1-XPF. SENP6 maintains these proteins in a hypo-SUMOylated state under unstressed conditions and counteracts their polySUMOylation after hydroxyurea-induced stress. Co-depletion of RNF4 leads to a further increase in SUMOylation of BRCA1, BARD1 and BLM, suggesting that SENP6 antagonizes targeting of these proteins by RNF4. Functionally, depletion of SENP6 results in uncoordinated recruitment and persistence of SUMO2/3 at UVA laser and ionizing radiation induced DNA damage sites. Additionally, SUMO2/3 and DNA damage response proteins accumulate in nuclear bodies, in a PML-independent manner driven by multivalent SUMO-SIM interactions. These data illustrate coordinated regulation of SUMOylated DNA damage response proteins by SENP6, governing their timely localization at DNA damage sites and nuclear condensation state.
Topics: Cysteine Proteases; Peptide Hydrolases; DNA Damage; Endopeptidases; Hydroxyurea
PubMed: 37735495
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-41623-w -
Genes Apr 2023Mutations of numerous genes involved in DNA replication, DNA repair, and DNA damage response (DDR) pathways lead to a variety of human diseases, including aging and...
Mutations of numerous genes involved in DNA replication, DNA repair, and DNA damage response (DDR) pathways lead to a variety of human diseases, including aging and cancer [...].
Topics: Humans; DNA Damage; DNA Repair; Mutation; Neoplasms; DNA Replication
PubMed: 37107651
DOI: 10.3390/genes14040893 -
International Journal of Molecular... Jul 2022Cells are constantly exposed to numerous genotoxic stresses that induce DNA damage. DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are among the most serious damages and should be... (Review)
Review
Cells are constantly exposed to numerous genotoxic stresses that induce DNA damage. DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are among the most serious damages and should be systematically repaired to preserve genomic integrity. The efficiency of repair is closely associated with chromatin structure, which is regulated by posttranslational modifications of histones, including ubiquitination. Recent evidence shows crosstalk between histone ubiquitination and DNA damage responses, suggesting an integrated model for the systematic regulation of DNA repair. There are two major pathways for DSB repair, viz., nonhomologous end joining and homologous recombination, and the choice of the pathway is partially controlled by posttranslational modifications of histones, including ubiquitination. Histone ubiquitination changes chromatin structure in the vicinity of DSBs and serves as a platform to select and recruit repair proteins; the removal of these modifications by deubiquitinating enzymes suppresses the recruitment of repair proteins and promotes the convergence of repair reactions. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the DNA damage response regulated by histone ubiquitination in response to DSBs.
Topics: Chromatin; DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded; DNA Damage; DNA End-Joining Repair; DNA Repair; Histones; Ubiquitination
PubMed: 35897775
DOI: 10.3390/ijms23158187 -
International Journal of Molecular... Feb 2023Nitrosamines occur widespread in food, drinking water, cosmetics, as well as tobacco smoke and can arise endogenously. More recently, nitrosamines have been detected as... (Review)
Review
Nitrosamines occur widespread in food, drinking water, cosmetics, as well as tobacco smoke and can arise endogenously. More recently, nitrosamines have been detected as impurities in various drugs. This is of particular concern as nitrosamines are alkylating agents that are genotoxic and carcinogenic. We first summarize the current knowledge on the different sources and chemical nature of alkylating agents with a focus on relevant nitrosamines. Subsequently, we present the major DNA alkylation adducts induced by nitrosamines upon their metabolic activation by CYP450 monooxygenases. We then describe the DNA repair pathways engaged by the various DNA alkylation adducts, which include base excision repair, direct damage reversal by MGMT and ALKBH, as well as nucleotide excision repair. Their roles in the protection against the genotoxic and carcinogenic effects of nitrosamines are highlighted. Finally, we address DNA translesion synthesis as a DNA damage tolerance mechanism relevant to DNA alkylation adducts.
Topics: Nitrosamines; DNA Damage; Alkylation; DNA Repair; Alkylating Agents; DNA Adducts
PubMed: 36902118
DOI: 10.3390/ijms24054684