-
In Vivo (Athens, Greece) 2023A real challenge for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and rheumatologists is primary nonresponse status (PNRS) or secondary nonresponse status (SNRS) to various...
BACKGROUND/AIM
A real challenge for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and rheumatologists is primary nonresponse status (PNRS) or secondary nonresponse status (SNRS) to various therapies. Despite their detrimental influence on patient life quality, PNRS and SNRS have no accurate definition and no early predictive criteria for their development exist. Patients with RA under 40 years of age are rare, hence PNRS and SNRS data for this age group are scarce. This study examined the PNRS and SNRS according to sex, age, BMI, therapy type, and duration.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Retrospectively, 115 patients with RA having PNRS and/or SNRS were stratified by age (22-39, 40-59, and 60-81). The association between body mass index (BMI), proinflammatory cytokines inhibitors, JAK inhibitors, and TNF-alpha inhibitors, sex, age, and PNRS and SNRS was examined.
RESULTS
All three proinflammatory cytokine inhibitors (rituximab, tocilizumab, and abatacept) were associated with PNRS and SNRS in women with a high BMI aged 40-59 years. Abatacept-related PNRS and SNRS was significant in women with normal BMI aged 60-81 years. Adalimumab, infliximab, and golimumab affected SNRS differently in women with normal BMI aged 22-39 years and women with high BMI aged 60-81 years. Etanercept and infliximab were associated with SNRS status in men with high-BMI aged 40-59 years.
CONCLUSION
PNRS and SNRS development in patients with RA is significantly influenced by age, sex, and BMI, but most importantly is closely and differentially related to therapy type and duration.
Topics: Male; Humans; Female; Adult; Infliximab; Abatacept; Antirheumatic Agents; Retrospective Studies; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha
PubMed: 37652478
DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13344 -
Blood Jun 2023Steroid-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) after allogeneic transplant remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Abatacept is a selective...
Steroid-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) after allogeneic transplant remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Abatacept is a selective costimulation modulator, used for the treatment of rheumatologic diseases, and was recently the first drug to be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the prophylaxis of acute graft-versus-host disease. We conducted a phase 2 study to evaluate the efficacy of abatacept in steroid-refractory cGVHD. The overall response rate was 58%, seen in 21 out of 36 patients, with all responders achieving a partial response. Abatacept was well tolerated with few serious infectious complications. Immune correlative studies showed a decrease in interleukin -1α (IL-1α), IL-21, and tumor necrosis factor α as well as decreased programmed cell death protein 1 expression by CD4+ T cells in all patients after treatment with abatacept, demonstrating the effect of this drug on the immune microenvironment. The results demonstrate that abatacept is a promising therapeutic strategy for the treatment of cGVHD. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01954979.
Topics: Humans; Abatacept; Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome; Graft vs Host Disease; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Steroids; Chronic Disease
PubMed: 36862975
DOI: 10.1182/blood.2022019107 -
ELife Dec 2023Germline CTLA-4 deficiency causes severe autoimmune diseases characterized by dysregulation of Foxp3 Tregs, hyper-activation of effector memory T cells, and variable...
Germline CTLA-4 deficiency causes severe autoimmune diseases characterized by dysregulation of Foxp3 Tregs, hyper-activation of effector memory T cells, and variable forms autoimmune cytopenia including gradual loss of B cells. Cancer patients with severe immune-related adverse events (irAE) after receiving anti-CTLA-4/PD-1 combination immunotherapy also have markedly reduced peripheral B cells. The immunological basis for B cell loss remains unexplained. Here, we probe the decline of B cells in human CTLA-4 knock-in mice by using anti-human CTLA-4 antibody Ipilimumab conjugated to a drug payload emtansine (Anti-CTLA-4 ADC). The anti-CTLA-4 ADC-treated mice have T cell hyper-proliferation and their differentiation into effector cells which results in B cell depletion. B cell depletion is mediated by both CD4 and CD8 T cells and at least partially rescued by anti-TNF-alpha antibody. These data revealed an unexpected antagonism between T and B cells and the importance of regulatory T cells in preserving B cells.
Topics: B-Lymphocytes; Abatacept; Animals; Mice; CTLA-4 Antigen; Lymphocyte Depletion; T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory; Apoptosis; Immunoglobulins; CHO Cells; Cricetulus; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Male; Female
PubMed: 38127423
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.87281 -
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) Jan 2023Scleroderma or systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an autoimmune disease affecting the connective tissue, characterized by fibrosis of the skin and internal organs. There is... (Review)
Review
Scleroderma or systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an autoimmune disease affecting the connective tissue, characterized by fibrosis of the skin and internal organs. There is currently no curative treatment available, so therapeutic action is aimed at a symptomatic treatment of the affected organs. The development of biotechnology has made it possible to implement certain biological drugs that could represent a window of opportunity to modulate the evolution and symptomatology of scleroderma with greater efficacy and less toxicity than conventional treatments. This study aimed to review the current evidence critically and systematically on the effects of biological drugs on the pulmonary function, skin disease, and health status of patients afflicted by diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc). Three electronic databases (Pubmed, Dialnet, and Cochrane Library Plus) were systematically searched until the cut-off date of October 2022. The review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and included original articles in English and Spanish with a controlled trial design, comparing biological drug treatments (tocilizumab, belimumab, riociguat, abatacept, and romilkimab) with a control group. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the McMaster quantitative form and the PEDro scale. A total of 383 studies were identified, 6 of them met the established criteria and were included in the present systematic review. A total of 426 patients treated with tocilizumab, belimumab, riociguat, abatacept, and romilkimab were included. The results showed substantial non-significant ( < 0.05) improvement trends after treatment with the biological drugs included in this review for the modified Rodnan Scale Value, Forced Vital Capacity, and Carbon Monoxide Diffusion Test; however, no benefits were shown on the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index when compared to the control group. Biological drugs, therefore, maybe a new therapeutic strategy for dcSSc and could be recommended as an additional and/or adjunctive treatment that promotes anti-fibrotic activity. This review could further define the clinical rationale for the use of biologics in the treatment of dcSSc and could provide key details on the study protocol, design, and outcome reporting.
Topics: Humans; Scleroderma, Diffuse; Abatacept; Biological Products; Scleroderma, Systemic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Fibrosis
PubMed: 36837449
DOI: 10.3390/medicina59020247 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2023Nephrotic syndrome affects about 2-7 per 100,000 children yearly and accounts for less than 15% of end stage kidney disease. Steroids still represent the cornerstone of... (Review)
Review
Nephrotic syndrome affects about 2-7 per 100,000 children yearly and accounts for less than 15% of end stage kidney disease. Steroids still represent the cornerstone of therapy achieving remission in 75-90% of the cases The remaining part result as steroid resistant nephrotic syndrome, characterized by the elevated risk of developing end stage kidney disease and frequently presenting disease recurrence in case of kidney transplant. The pathogenesis of nephrotic syndrome is still far to be elucidated, however, efficacy of immune treatments provided the basis to suggest the involvement of the immune system in the pathogenesis of the disease. Based on these substrates, more immune drugs, further than steroids, were administered in steroid resistant nephrotic syndrome, such as antiproliferative and alkylating agents or calcineurin inhibitors. However, such treatments failed in inducing a sustained remission. In last two decades, the developments of monoclonal antibodies, including the anti-CD20 rituximab and inhibitor of B7-1 abatacept, represented a valid opportunity of treatment. However, also the effectiveness of biologics resulted limited. We here propose a new hypothesis-driven treatment based on the combining administration of rituximab with the anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody daratumumab (NCT05704400), sustained by the hypothesis to target the entire B-cells subtypes pool, including the long-lived plasmacells.
Topics: Child; Humans; Biological Products; Nephrotic Syndrome; Rituximab; Abatacept; Kidney Failure, Chronic
PubMed: 37705972
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1213203 -
Polish Archives of Internal Medicine Jun 2022Large vessel vasculitis (LVV), including Takayasu arteritis (TAK) and giant cell arteritis (GCA), causes granulomatous vascular inflammation mainly in large vessels, and...
Large vessel vasculitis (LVV), including Takayasu arteritis (TAK) and giant cell arteritis (GCA), causes granulomatous vascular inflammation mainly in large vessels, and is the most common primary vasculitis in adults. Vascular inflammation may evoke many clinical features including vision impairment, stroke, limb ischemia, and aortic aneurysms. The best way to diagnose LVV is to combine medical history, physical examination, various laboratory tests, and imaging modalities. Progress in imaging modalities facilitated early diagnosis and follow‑up of the disease activity. Conventional angiography is no longer the gold standard for the diagnosis of TAK. Similarly, temporal artery biopsy is no longer the only tool for diagnosing cranial GCA. In selected cases, color Doppler ultrasound may be used for this purpose. Despite some similarities, TAK and GCA differ in many aspects and they are different diseases. They also have different clinical subtypes. The presence of aortitis does not always implicate the diagnosis of TAK or GCA; infectious aortitis, as well as noninfectious aortitis associated with other autoimmune rheumatic diseases should be excluded. Treatment of LVV includes glucocorticoids (GCs), conventional immunosuppressive agents, and biological drugs. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors are ineffective in GCA but effective in TAK. On the other hand, tocilizumab may be used to treat both diseases. Promising targeted therapies evaluated in ongoing clinical trials include, for example, anti‑IL‑12/23 (ustekinumab), anti‑IL‑17 (secukinumab), anti‑IL‑1 (anakinra), anti‑IL‑23 (guselkumab), anti‑cytotoxic T‑lymphocyte antigen 4 (abatacept), Janus kinase inhibitors (tofacitinib and upadacitinib), anti‑granulocyte / macrophage colony‑stimulating factor (mavrilimumab), and endothelin receptor (bosentan) therapies.
Topics: Adult; Aortitis; Giant Cell Arteritis; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Inflammation; Takayasu Arteritis
PubMed: 35699647
DOI: 10.20452/pamw.16272 -
Nature Communications Nov 2022Blockade of CD28 costimulation with CTLA-4-Ig/Abatacept is used to dampen effector T cell responses in autoimmune and transplantation settings. However, a significant...
Blockade of CD28 costimulation with CTLA-4-Ig/Abatacept is used to dampen effector T cell responses in autoimmune and transplantation settings. However, a significant drawback of this approach is impaired regulatory T cell homeostasis that requires CD28 signaling. Therefore, strategies that restrict the effects of costimulation blockade to effector T cells would be advantageous. Here we probe the relative roles of CD28 and IL-2 in maintaining Treg. We find provision of IL-2 counteracts the regulatory T cell loss induced by costimulation blockade while minimally affecting the conventional T cell compartment. These data suggest that combining costimulation blockade with IL-2 treatment may selectively impair effector T cell responses while maintaining regulatory T cells. Using a mouse model of autoimmune diabetes, we show combined therapy supports regulatory T cell homeostasis and protects from disease. These findings are recapitulated in humanised mice using clinically relevant reagents and provide an exemplar for rational use of a second immunotherapy to offset known limitations of the first.
Topics: T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory; CD28 Antigens; Autoimmunity; Interleukin-2; CTLA-4 Antigen; Lymphocyte Activation; Abatacept; Immunomodulation
PubMed: 36347877
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-34477-1 -
Drugs Jan 2020Costimulation between T cells and antigen-presenting cells is essential for the regulation of an effective alloimmune response and is not targeted with the conventional... (Review)
Review
Costimulation between T cells and antigen-presenting cells is essential for the regulation of an effective alloimmune response and is not targeted with the conventional immunosuppressive therapy after kidney transplantation. Costimulation blockade therapy with biologicals allows precise targeting of the immune response but without non-immune adverse events. Multiple costimulation blockade approaches have been developed that inhibit the alloimmune response in kidney transplant recipients with varying degrees of success. Belatacept, an immunosuppressive drug that selectively targets the CD28-CD80/CD86 pathway, is the only costimulation blockade therapy that is currently approved for kidney transplant recipients. In the last decade, belatacept therapy has been shown to be a promising therapy in subgroups of kidney transplant recipients; however, the widespread use of belatacept has been tempered by an increased risk of acute kidney transplant rejection. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the costimulation blockade therapies that are currently in use or being developed for kidney transplant indications.
Topics: Abatacept; Animals; B7-1 Antigen; B7-2 Antigen; CD28 Antigens; Graft Rejection; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Kidney Transplantation
PubMed: 31749062
DOI: 10.1007/s40265-019-01226-6 -
American Journal of Transplantation :... Oct 2023Combined antigen-specific T cell receptor stimulation and costimulation are needed for complete T cell activation. Belatacept and abatacept are nondepleting fusion...
Combined antigen-specific T cell receptor stimulation and costimulation are needed for complete T cell activation. Belatacept and abatacept are nondepleting fusion proteins blocking CD28/B7 costimulation, whereas siplizumab is a depleting antiCD2 immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody targeting CD2/CD58 costimulation. Herein, the effect of siplizumab combination therapy with abatacept or belatacept on T cell alloreactivity in mixed lymphocyte reactions was investigated. In contrast to monotherapy, the combination of siplizumab with belatacept or abatacept induced near-complete suppression of T cell proliferation and increased the potency of siplizumab-mediated T cell inhibition. Furthermore, dual targeting of CD2 and CD28 costimulation enhanced the selective depletion of memory T cells compared with monotherapy. Although siplizumab monotherapy leads to significant regulatory T cell enrichment, high doses of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 and a human IgG1 Fc fragment in the combination therapy reduced this effect. These results support the clinical evaluation of dual costimulation blockade, combining siplizumab with abatacept or belatacept, for the prophylaxis of organ transplant rejection and improvement of long-term outcomes following transplantation. Ongoing investigative research will elucidate when other forms of siplizumab-based dual costimulatory blockade may be able to induce similarly strong inhibition of T cell activation although still allowing for enrichment of regulatory T cells.
Topics: Humans; Abatacept; CD28 Antigens; Kidney Transplantation; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Immunosuppressive Agents; Graft Rejection
PubMed: 37270108
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.05.032 -
Paediatric Drugs Apr 2020Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and their derivatives are increasingly used in pediatric pharmacotherapy, and the number of antibody-based drug products with approved... (Review)
Review
Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and their derivatives are increasingly used in pediatric pharmacotherapy, and the number of antibody-based drug products with approved pediatric indications is continuously growing. In most instances, pediatric use is being pursued after the efficacy and safety of novel antibody medications have been established in adult indications. The pediatric extrapolation exercise that is frequently used in this context to bridge efficacy and safety from adults to children is oftentimes challenged through uncertainties and knowledge gaps in how to reliably extrapolate pharmacokinetics and clinical pharmacology of mAbs to different pediatric age groups, and how to derive age-appropriate dosing regimens that strike a balance between precision dosing and practicability. The article highlights some of the pharmacokinetic and clinical pharmacology challenges with regard to therapeutic use of mAbs and antibody derivatives in children, including immunogenicity events. Although considering body size-based differences in drug disposition can account for many of the perceived and actual differences in the distribution and elimination of antibody-based therapeutics between children and adults, increasing evidence suggests potential or actual age-associated differences beyond size differences, especially for young pediatric patients such as newborns and infants. To overcome age-associated differences in antibody disposition, various different dosing approaches have been applied to ensure safe and efficacious antibody exposure for pediatric populations of different ages. The development of such dosing regimens and the associated pathway to pediatric indication approval is illustrated in more detail for two antibody-based biologics, the fusion protein abatacept and the mAb tocilizumab.
Topics: Adolescent; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Child; Child, Preschool; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Neoplasms
PubMed: 32052309
DOI: 10.1007/s40272-020-00382-7