-
Cells Aug 2019Full activation of T lymphocytes requires signals from both T cell receptors and costimulatory molecules. In addition to CD28, several T cell molecules could deliver... (Review)
Review
Full activation of T lymphocytes requires signals from both T cell receptors and costimulatory molecules. In addition to CD28, several T cell molecules could deliver costimulatory signals, including CD154, which primarily interacts with CD40 on B-cells. CD40 is a critical molecule regulating several B-cell functions, such as antibody production, germinal center formation and cellular proliferation. Upregulated expression of CD40 and CD154 occurs in immune effector cells and non-immune cells in different autoimmune diseases. In addition, therapeutic benefits have been observed by blocking the CD40-CD154 interaction in animals with collagen-induced arthritis. Given the therapeutic success of the biologics abatacept, which blocks CD28 costimulation, and rituximab, which deletes B cells in the treatment of autoimmune arthritis, the inhibition of the CD40-CD154 axis has two advantages, namely, attenuating CD154-mediated T cell costimulation and suppressing CD40-mediated B-cell stimulation. Furthermore, blockade of the CD40-CD154 interaction drives the conversion of CD4+ T cells to regulatory T cells that mediate immunosuppression. Currently, several biological products targeting the CD40-CD154 axis have been developed and are undergoing early phase clinical trials with encouraging success in several autoimmune disorders, including autoimmune arthritis. This review addresses the roles of the CD40-CD154 axis in the pathogenesis of autoimmune arthritis and its potential as a therapeutic target.
Topics: Abatacept; Animals; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis; Autoimmune Diseases; B-Lymphocytes; CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes; CD40 Antigens; CD40 Ligand; Cells, Cultured; Humans; Lymphocyte Activation; Mice; Rituximab; Signal Transduction
PubMed: 31426619
DOI: 10.3390/cells8080927 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2022Belatacept (Bela) was developed to reduce nephrotoxicity and cardiovascular risk that are associated with the chronic use of Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) in kidney... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Belatacept (Bela) was developed to reduce nephrotoxicity and cardiovascular risk that are associated with the chronic use of Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) in kidney transplant recipients. The use of Bela with early steroid withdrawal (ESW) and simultaneous CNI avoidance has not been formally evaluated.
METHODS
At 3 months post-transplant, stable kidney transplant recipients with ESW on Tacrolimus (Tac) + mycophenolate (MPA) were randomized 1:1:1 to: 1) Bela+MPA, 2) Bela+low-dose Tac (trough goal <5 ng/mL), or 3) continue Tac+MPA. All patients underwent surveillance graft biopsies at enrollment and then at 12, and 24 months post-transplant. Twenty-seven recipients were included; 9 underwent conversion to Bela+MPA, 8 to Bela+low-dose Tac and 10 continued Tac+MPA. Serial blood samples were collected for immune phenotyping and gene expression analyses.
RESULTS
The Bela+MPA arm was closed early due to high rate of biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR). The incidence of BPAR was 4/9 in Bela+MPA, 0/8 in Bela+low dose Tac and 2/10 in Tac+MPA, P= 0.087. The Bela+low-dose Tac regimen was associated with +8.8 mL/min/1.73 m increase in eGFR compared to -0.38 mL/min/1.73 m in Tac+MPA, P= 0.243. One graft loss occurred in the Bela+MPA group. Immunophenotyping of peripheral blood monocyte count (PBMC) showed that CD28CD4 and CD28CD8 T cells were higher in Bela+MPA patients with acute rejection compared to patients without rejection, although the difference did not reach statistical significance.
CONCLUSIONS
Our data indicate that, in steroid free regimens, low-dose Tac maintenance is needed to prevent rejection when patients are converted to Bela, at least when the maneuver is done early after transplant.
Topics: Humans; Abatacept; Calcineurin; Calcineurin Inhibitors; CD28 Antigens; CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Immunosuppressive Agents; Kidney Transplantation; Leukocytes, Mononuclear; Mycophenolic Acid; Steroids; Tacrolimus; Drug Substitution
PubMed: 36601111
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1096881 -
Frontiers in Pediatrics 2022Our study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Tocilizumab and Abatacept for treating Childhood Chronic non-infectious Uveitis (CCU), resistant to anti-tumor necrosis...
BACKGROUND
Our study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Tocilizumab and Abatacept for treating Childhood Chronic non-infectious Uveitis (CCU), resistant to anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) treatment.
METHODS
This is a monocentric retrospective charts review study (January 2010-April 2021) recruiting CCU, refractory to anti-TNF. To be included, children should have active uveitis at the time of Tocilizumab (8 mg/kg, every 4 weeks) or Abatacept (10 mg/kg, every 4 weeks). The main outcome was the achievement of ocular remission on treatment defined as the absence of flares for ≥ 6 months.
RESULTS
In this study, 18 patients with CCU (14 F), previously treated with Methotrexate and Adalimumab, were enrolled: 15 had juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) (83.3%), 2 idiopathic (11.1%), and 1 Behçet (5.6%). Furthermore, ten patients received Abatacept and 8 patients received Tocilizumab. The mean duration of treatment on Abatacept was 31.6 months (SD ± 30.8), on Tocilizumab 25.25 months (SD ± 17.8). In total, 13 children (72.2%) achieved remission, with a better remission rate for the Tocilizumab group (8/8) compared to the Abatacept group (5/10) (χ 5.53, = 0.019). No difference was evaluated between the two groups in the proportion of patients who showed flares during the treatment (2/6 Abatacept vs. 1/8 Tocilizumab). A significant difference was evaluated in the proportion of patients who flared after treatment discontinuation: 3/3 Abatacept vs. 0/3 Tocilizumab (χ 3.8, = 0.025).
CONCLUSION
Even though this is a monocentric retrospective study, in a relatively small group, our study suggests a superior efficacy of Tocilizumab over Abatacept for treating anti-TNF refractory CCU.
PubMed: 35498797
DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.851453 -
The Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology... 2021The lack of randomized controlled trials comparing biologics for the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) has led to wide variation in treatment approaches....
OBJECTIVE
The lack of randomized controlled trials comparing biologics for the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) has led to wide variation in treatment approaches. The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of abatacept, adalimumab, and etanercept in JIA patients treated at a tertiary pediatric institution.
METHODS
This was a single-center, retrospective chart review of patients initiated on abatacept, adalimumab, or etanercept from December 1, 2015, to August 31, 2018, at Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt (VCH). The primary outcome was the change in the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) score after 4 to 6 months of biologic therapy. Secondary outcomes included change in laboratory markers of JIA disease activity, change in the number of joints with active disease or limitation of motion, reduction in corticosteroid dose, adverse effects, adherence among patients who have their medications filled at the institution's specialty pharmacy, and reason for discontinuation of therapy.
RESULTS
A total of 139 patients were included, with a median age of 13 years. Most patients, 80.6%, experienced a reduction in their PGA score after starting biologic therapy. There was not a statistically significant difference among the agents (p = 0.64). Adverse effects were reported in only 26.6% of patients, with the most frequent being injection site reactions or pain (n = 35). Ultimately, 32% of patients discontinued biologic therapy with a lack of efficacy being the most common reason.
CONCLUSIONS
Abatacept, adalimumab, and etanercept were not significantly different in efficacy and safety for the treatment of JIA at this single institution.
PubMed: 33603579
DOI: 10.5863/1551-6776-26.2.157 -
JCI Insight Dec 2022Here, the efficacy of abatacept in patients with early diffuse systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) was analyzed to test the hypothesis that patients in the inflammatory intrinsic... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Here, the efficacy of abatacept in patients with early diffuse systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) was analyzed to test the hypothesis that patients in the inflammatory intrinsic subset would show the most significant clinical improvement. Eighty-four participants with dcSSc were randomized to receive abatacept or placebo for 12 months. RNA-Seq was performed on 233 skin paired biopsies at baseline and at 3 and 6 months. Improvement was defined as a 5-point or more than 20% change in modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) between baseline and 12 months. Samples were assigned to intrinsic gene expression subsets (inflammatory, fibroproliferative, or normal-like subsets). In the abatacept arm, change in mRSS was most pronounced for the inflammatory and normal-like subsets relative to the placebo subset. Gene expression for participants on placebo remained in the original molecular subset, whereas inflammatory participants treated with abatacept had gene expression that moved toward the normal-like subset. The Costimulation of the CD28 Family Reactome Pathway decreased in patients who improved on abatacept and was specific to the inflammatory subset. Patients in the inflammatory subset had elevation of the Costimulation of the CD28 Family pathway at baseline relative to that of participants in the fibroproliferative and normal-like subsets. There was a correlation between improved ΔmRSS and baseline expression of the Costimulation of the CD28 Family pathway. This study provides an example of precision medicine in systemic sclerosis clinical trials.
Topics: Humans; Abatacept; CD28 Antigens; Scleroderma, Systemic; Scleroderma, Diffuse; Skin
PubMed: 36355434
DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.155282 -
Current Treatment Options in Neurology 2020This review presents the current recommended therapeutic interventions for inflammatory disease in the central nervous system (CNS) secondary to systemic diseases of... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
This review presents the current recommended therapeutic interventions for inflammatory disease in the central nervous system (CNS) secondary to systemic diseases of immune dysregulation. Treatment recommendations for CNS inflammation associated with rheumatologic conditions, immune-related adverse effects from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and demyelinating disease from tumor necrosis factor-α (anti-TNFs) are explored. Additional therapeutic options for inflammation related to postviral syndromes and genetic immunodeficiencies are also discussed.
RECENT FINDINGS
In addition to treatment of mild, moderate, and severe CNS rheumatologic disease as guided by the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR), early consideration of rituximab for severe IgG4-related disease and induction with anti-TNF therapy for severe neurosarcoidosis should be considered. Although often not first line, treatment options for CNS inflammatory diseases based on disease mechanism are emerging, including tocilizumab for Behcet's disease, natalizumab for ICI associated autoimmune encephalitis, and abatacept for treatment of infiltrative disease secondary to CTLA-4 deficiency. Hematopoietic stem cell treatments represent highly efficacious but risky options for autoimmunity related to genetic immunodeficiency.
SUMMARY
While early high dose steroids remains first line therapy for most CNS inflammatory conditions, a rapidly expanding arsenal of immune targeted therapies offers clinicians tailored disease specific options for treatment.
PubMed: 32834714
DOI: 10.1007/s11940-020-00636-2 -
Scientific Reports Oct 2023Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) causes bone loss, only partly related to inflammation. The impact of RA treatments on bone metabolism and their ability to mitigate bone loss... (Observational Study)
Observational Study
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) causes bone loss, only partly related to inflammation. The impact of RA treatments on bone metabolism and their ability to mitigate bone loss remains uncertain. The primary goal of our study was to examine the influence of abatacept on serum levels of markers and regulators involved in bone turnover. Secondary objectives included evaluating changes in bone mineral density (BMD), bone health parameters, erosions, and exploring potential correlations among these parameters. We conducted a prospective observational study on patients with active seropositive RA failure to biological disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs initiating treatment with abatacept. We measured at baseline and after 1, 2, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months: serum bone turnover markers (CTX, P1nP, B-ALP), bone modulators (Dkk-1, sclerostin, vitamin D, PTH, OPG and RANKL), BMD and radiographic parameters (modified Sharp van der Heijde score [mSvdH], bone health index [BHI] and metacarpal index [MCI]). Disease activity and glucocorticoid intake was monitored. 33 patients were enrolled in the study. We found a significant increase in markers of bone formation (B-ALP and P1nP) from baseline to M6 and M12. PTH increased significantly at M6 but not at M12. All other bone markers and modulators did not change. We found a significant decrease in BHI and MCI from baseline to M12 (median difference - 0.17 95% CI - 0.42 to - 0.10, p 0.001 and - 0.09 95% CI - 0.23 to - 0.07, respectively). BMD at femoral neck transitorily decreased at M6 (mean difference - 0.019 g/cm 95% CI - 0.036 to - 0.001 p 0.04). BMD at total hip, lumbar spine and mSvdH score did not change significantly. P1nP delta at M12 correlated with delta mSvdH. Treatment with abatacept was associated with a significant increase in bone formation markers. The secondary and transient increase in PTH serum levels may be responsible of the transitory bone loss.
Topics: Humans; Abatacept; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Biomarkers; Bone and Bones; Bone Density; Bone Diseases, Metabolic; Bone Remodeling; Prospective Studies
PubMed: 37821541
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-44374-2 -
Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal... 2022The results of randomized controlled (RCT) and retrospective studies have expanded the armamentarium of drugs for systemic sclerosis (SSc) - interstitial lung disease... (Review)
Review
Open questions on the management of targeted therapies for the treatment of systemic sclerosis-interstitial lung disease: results of a EUSTAR survey based on a systemic literature review.
BACKGROUND
The results of randomized controlled (RCT) and retrospective studies have expanded the armamentarium of drugs for systemic sclerosis (SSc) - interstitial lung disease (ILD) treatment. The correct positioning of these drugs is not yet clarified.
OBJECTIVES
Systemic literature review (SLR) on rituximab (RTX), tocilizumab (TCZ), nintedanib and abatacept (ABT) for the treatment of SSc-ILD. The results of the SLR were used to create a dedicated survey.
DESIGN
The study was performed as a systematic review.
DATA SOURCES AND METHODS
the SLR was performed using the following terms: "(systemic sclerosis OR scleroderma) AND (interstitial lung disease OR lung fibrosis OR pulmonary fibrosis) AND (rituximab OR tocilizumab OR abatacept OR nintedanib)". The results of the SLR were integrated in a survey including 8 domains. These were sent to all EUSTAR members and to the participants of the 2020 Scleroderma World Congress.
RESULTS
41 studies (34 on RTX, 5 on TCZ, 2 on ABT, and 1 on nintedanib) were identified. RCTs supported the use of TCZ and nintedanib, while retrospective studies supported the use of RTX for SSc-ILD. No clear data were obtained about ABT. The survey showed that RTX is the most available option (96%) whereas the most frequent reason for targeted therapy introduction is lung progression while on csDMARDs (86% RTX, 59% TCZ and 63% nintedanib). Combination therapy was the most frequently mentioned therapeutic scheme for nintedanib (75%) and RTX (63%). Physicians' perception of safety was similar for all drugs, while drug efficacy was the same for RTX and nintedanib, followed by TCZ (4.8 ± 2). The most frequently raised concerns pertained to efficacy, safety and combination regimens.
CONCLUSION
Our SLR supports the use of RTX, TCZ and nintedanib for SSc-ILD patients and underlines the need for more data about upfront combination versus monotherapy. It also highlighted the need to identify predictors supporting drug choice according to both pulmonary and extra-pulmonary manifestations.
PubMed: 36051631
DOI: 10.1177/1759720X221116408 -
Genes & Diseases Sep 2021CTLA4 deficiency and LRBA deficiency are a group disorders of immune dysregulation that affect CTLA4 pathway. The patients mainly present with autoimmunity, antibody...
CTLA4 deficiency and LRBA deficiency are a group disorders of immune dysregulation that affect CTLA4 pathway. The patients mainly present with autoimmunity, antibody deficiency and recurrent infections. Here we reported three Chinese patients with and mutations. They all presented with chronic diarrhea, hypokalemia, organomegaly, recurrent infections, and hypogammaglobulinemia. Reduced Treg cells and increased percentage of circulating follicular helper T (cTfh) cells were revealed in these patients. Although steroid and immunoglobulin therapy were given, the enteropathy was persistent. Therefore, abatacept treatment was provided to these patients. They showed a marked improvement of enteropathy and gastrointestinal endoscopy showed alleviated inflammatory lesion and follicular hyperplasia. Furthermore, the frequency of cTfh cells was reduced after abatacept therapy. Taken together, targeted therapy with abatacept is a promising treatment modality for patients with LRBA and CTLA4 deficiency. The findings also suggest that the frequency of cTfh cells could serve as a marker for tracking disease activity and the response to abatacept therapy.
PubMed: 34291137
DOI: 10.1016/j.gendis.2020.03.001 -
Common Transcriptomic Effects of Abatacept and Other DMARDs on Rheumatoid Arthritis Synovial Tissue.Frontiers in Immunology 2021Our goal was to assess for the histological and transcriptomic effects of abatacept on RA synovia, and to compare them with previously published data from four other...
OBJECTIVES
Our goal was to assess for the histological and transcriptomic effects of abatacept on RA synovia, and to compare them with previously published data from four other DMARDs: tocilizumab, rituximab, methotrexate, and adalimumab.
METHODS
Synovial tissue was obtained using ultrasound-guided biopsy from affected joints of 14 patients, before and 16 weeks after treatment with subcutaneous abatacept 125 mg weekly. Paraffin-sections were stained and scored for CD3, CD20, and CD68 cell infiltration. Transcriptional profiling was performed using GeneChip Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 arrays (Affymetrix) and analyzed on Genespring GX (Agilent). Pathway analyses were performed on Genespring GX, Metascape, and EnrichR.
RESULTS
Gene expression analysis identified 304 transcripts modulated by abatacept in synovial tissue. Downregulated genes were significantly enriched for immune processes, strongly overlapping with our findings on other therapies. Data were pooled across these studies, revealing that genes downregulated by DMARDs are significantly enriched for both T-cell and myeloid leukocyte activation pathways. Interestingly, DMARDs seem to have coordinate effects on the two pathways, with a stronger impact in good responders to therapy as compared to moderate and non-responders.
CONCLUSION
We provide evidence that the effects of five DMARDs on the RA synovium culminate in the same pathways. This confirms previous studies suggesting the existence of common mediators downstream of DMARDs, independent of their primary targets.
Topics: Abatacept; Adalimumab; Adult; Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Female; Gene Expression Profiling; Humans; Immunohistochemistry; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Rituximab; Signal Transduction; Synovial Membrane; Transcriptome
PubMed: 34526997
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.724895