-
Head and Neck Pathology Mar 2022The salivary gland section in the 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Head and Neck Tumours features a description and inclusion of several...
The salivary gland section in the 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Head and Neck Tumours features a description and inclusion of several new entities, including sclerosing polycystic adenoma, keratocystoma, intercalated duct adenoma, and striated duct adenoma among the benign neoplasms; and microsecretory adenocarcinoma and sclerosing microcystic adenocarcinoma as the new malignant entities. The new entry also includes mucinous adenocarcinoma subdivided into papillary, colloid, signet ring, and mixed subtypes with recurrent AKT1 E17K mutations across patterns suggesting that mucin-producing salivary adenocarcinomas represent a histologically diverse single entity that may be related to salivary intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN). Importantly, the number of entities in the salivary chapter has been reduced by omitting tumors or lesions if they do not occur exclusively or predominantly in salivary glands, including hemangioma, lipoma, nodular fasciitis and hematolymphoid tumors. They are now discussed in detail elsewhere in the book. Cribriform adenocarcinoma of salivary gland origin (CASG) now represents a distinctive subtype of polymorphous adenocarcinoma (PAC). PAC is defined as a clinically, histologically and molecularly heterogeneous disease group. Whether CASG is a different diagnostic category or a variant of PAC is still controversial. Poorly differentiated carcinomas and oncocytic carcinomas are discussed in the category "Salivary carcinoma not otherwise specified (NOS) and emerging entities". New defining genomic alterations have been characterized in many salivary gland tumors. In particular, they include gene fusions, which have shown to be tightly tumor-type specific, and thus valuable for use in diagnostically challenging cases. The recurrent molecular alterations were included in the definition of mucoepidermoid carcinoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma, secretory carcinoma, polymorphous adenocarcinoma, hyalinizing clear cell carcinoma, mucinous adenocarcinoma, and microsecretory adenocarcinoma.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous; Adenoma; Biomarkers, Tumor; Humans; Salivary Gland Neoplasms; Salivary Glands; World Health Organization
PubMed: 35312980
DOI: 10.1007/s12105-022-01420-1 -
Journal of Thoracic Oncology : Official... Mar 2022The 2021 WHO Classification of Thoracic Tumours was published earlier this year, with classification of lung tumors being one of the chapters. The principles remain... (Review)
Review
The 2021 WHO Classification of Thoracic Tumours was published earlier this year, with classification of lung tumors being one of the chapters. The principles remain those of using morphology first, supported by immunohistochemistry, and then molecular techniques. In 2015, there was particular emphasis on using immunohistochemistry to make classification more accurate. In 2021, there is greater emphasis throughout the book on advances in molecular pathology across all tumor types. Major features within this edition are (1) broader emphasis on genetic testing than in the 2015 WHO Classification; (2) a section entirely dedicated to the classification of small diagnostic samples; (3) continued recommendation to document percentages of histologic patterns in invasive nonmucinous adenocarcinomas, with utilization of these features to apply a formal grading system, and using only invasive size for T-factor size determination in part lepidic nonmucinous lung adenocarcinomas as recommended by the eighth edition TNM classification; (4) recognition of spread through airspaces as a histologic feature with prognostic significance; (5) moving lymphoepithelial carcinoma to squamous cell carcinomas; (6) update on evolving concepts in lung neuroendocrine neoplasm classification; (7) recognition of bronchiolar adenoma/ciliated muconodular papillary tumor as a new entity within the adenoma subgroup; (8) recognition of thoracic SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumor; and (9) inclusion of essential and desirable diagnostic criteria for each tumor.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adenocarcinoma of Lung; Adenoma; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; DNA Helicases; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Nuclear Proteins; Transcription Factors; World Health Organization
PubMed: 34808341
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.11.003 -
Nature Reviews. Gastroenterology &... Feb 2020Colorectal cancer (CRC), a leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, evolves as a result of the stepwise accumulation of a series of genetic and epigenetic... (Review)
Review
Colorectal cancer (CRC), a leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, evolves as a result of the stepwise accumulation of a series of genetic and epigenetic alterations in the normal colonic epithelium, leading to the development of colorectal adenomas and invasive adenocarcinomas. Although genetic alterations have a major role in a subset of CRCs, the pathophysiological contribution of epigenetic aberrations in this malignancy has attracted considerable attention. Data from the past couple of decades has unequivocally illustrated that epigenetic marks are important molecular hallmarks of cancer, as they occur very early in disease pathogenesis, involve virtually all key cancer-associated pathways and, most importantly, can be exploited as clinically relevant disease biomarkers for diagnosis, prognostication and prediction of treatment response. In this Review, we summarize the current knowledge on the best-studied epigenetic modifications in CRC, including DNA methylation and histone modifications, as well as the role of non-coding RNAs as epigenetic regulators. We focus on the emerging potential for the bench-to-bedside translation of some of these epigenetic alterations into clinical practice and discuss the burgeoning evidence supporting the potential of emerging epigenetic therapies in CRC as we usher in the era of precision medicine.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adenoma; Biomarkers, Tumor; Colorectal Neoplasms; DNA Methylation; Epigenesis, Genetic; Histone Code; Humans; MicroRNAs; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Prognosis
PubMed: 31900466
DOI: 10.1038/s41575-019-0230-y -
Deutsches Arzteblatt International Aug 2023Neoplasms of the vermiform appendix are rare. They comprise a heterogeneous group of entities requiring differentkinds of treatment. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Neoplasms of the vermiform appendix are rare. They comprise a heterogeneous group of entities requiring differentkinds of treatment.
METHODS
This review is based on publications retrieved by a selective literature search in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochranedatabases.
RESULTS
0.5% of all tumors of the gastrointestinal tract arise in the appendix. Their treatment depends on their histopathologicalclassification and tumor stage. The mucosal epithelium gives rise to adenomas, sessile serrated lesions, adenocarcinomas,goblet-cell adenocarcinomas, and mucinous neoplasms. Neuroendocrine neoplasms originate in neuroectodermal tissue. Adenomasof the appendix can usually be definitively treated by appendectomy. Mucinous neoplasms, depending on their tumorstage, may require additional cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion (HIPEC). Adeno -carcinomas and goblet-cell adenocarcinomas can metastasize via the lymphatic vessels and the bloodstream and should thereforebe treated by oncological right hemicolectomy. Approximately 80% of neuroendocrine tumors are less than 1 cm in diameterwhen diagnosed and can therefore be adequately treated by appendectomy; right hemicolectomy is recommended if the patienthas risk factors for metastasis via the lymphatic vessels. Systemic chemotherapy has not been shown to be beneficial forappendiceal neoplasms in prospective, randomized trials; it is recommended for adenocarcinomas and goblet-cell adenocarcinomasof stage III or higher, in analogy to the treatment of colorectal carcinoma.
Topics: Humans; Appendix; Appendiceal Neoplasms; Prospective Studies; Hyperthermia, Induced; Adenocarcinoma; Appendectomy
PubMed: 37282595
DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2023.0136 -
Radiologia 2023Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer in the world. The most common histologic subtype is adenocarcinoma. Gastric adenocarcinomas are staged using the American... (Review)
Review
Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer in the world. The most common histologic subtype is adenocarcinoma. Gastric adenocarcinomas are staged using the American Joint Committee on Cancer's 8th TNM classification. The perigastric ligaments, mesentery, omentum, and potential spaces between the parietal and visceral peritoneal linings play are important structures for staging. The spread of disease is influenced by the location of the tumor within the stomach, as well as by the anatomy related to the ligaments and lymph vessels. CT is the imaging modality of choice for the preoperative clinical staging of gastric cancer, and it is essential for planning treatment. To be able to do an adequate imaging workup, radiologists need to know the different pathways through which gastric cancer can spread: lymphatic, subperitoneal, direct invasion, transperitoneal, hematogenous, and extramural venous invasion.
Topics: Humans; Neoplasm Staging; Stomach Neoplasms; Adenocarcinoma
PubMed: 36842787
DOI: 10.1016/j.rxeng.2022.10.011 -
Virchows Archiv : An International... Nov 2019Endocervical adenocarcinomas (ECAs) are currently classified according to the 2014 World Health Organization (WHO) system, which is predominantly based on descriptive... (Review)
Review
Endocervical adenocarcinomas (ECAs) are currently classified according to the 2014 World Health Organization (WHO) system, which is predominantly based on descriptive morphologic characteristics, considers factors bearing minimal etiological, clinical, or therapeutic relevance, and lacks sufficient reproducibility. The 2017 International Endocervical Adenocarcinoma Criteria and Classification (IECC) system was developed by a group of international collaborators to address these limitations. The IECC system separates ECAs into two major groups-those that are human papillomavirus-associated (HPVA) and those that are non-HPV-associated (NHPVA)-based on morphology (linked to etiology) alone, precluding the need for an expensive panel of immunohistochemical markers for most cases. The major types of HPVA ECA include the usual (with villoglandular and micropapillary architectural variants) and mucinous types (not otherwise specified [NOS], intestinal, signet-ring, and invasive stratified mucin-producing carcinoma). Invasive adenocarcinoma NOS is morphologically uninformative, yet considered part of this group when HPV positive. NHPVA ECAs include gastric, clear cell, endometrioid, and mesonephric types. The IECC system is supported by demographic and clinical features (HPVA ECAs develop in younger patients, are smaller, and are diagnosed at an earlier stage), p16/HPV status (almost all HPVA ECAs are p16 and/or HPV positive), prognostic parameters (NHPVA ECAs more often have lymphovascular invasion, lymph node metastases, and are Silva pattern C), and survival data (NHPVA ECAs are associated with worse survival). A move from the morphology-based WHO system to the IECC system will likely provide clinicians with an improved means to diagnose and classify ECAs, and ultimately, to better personalize treatment for these patients.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Cervix Uteri; Female; Humans; Lymphatic Metastasis; Papillomaviridae; Papillomavirus Infections; Prognosis; Reproducibility of Results; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
PubMed: 31209635
DOI: 10.1007/s00428-019-02601-0 -
International Journal of Molecular... Nov 2022Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer in women. It is the leading cause of female deaths in developing countries. Most of these cervical neoplasms are... (Review)
Review
Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer in women. It is the leading cause of female deaths in developing countries. Most of these cervical neoplasms are represented by squamous lesions. Cervical adenocarcinoma causes about a quarter of cervical cancers. In contrast to squamous lesions, cervical glandular disease is HPV-negative in about 15-20% of cases. HPV-negative cervical adenocarcinomas typically present in advanced stages at clinical evaluation, resulting in a poorer prognosis. The overall and disease-free survival of glandular lesions is lower than that of squamous lesions. Treatment options require definitive treatments, as fertility-sparing is not recommended. Moreover, the impact of HPV vaccination and primary HPV screening is likely to affect these lesions less; hence, the interest in this challenging topic for clinical practice. An updated review focusing on clinical and molecular characterization, prognostic factors, and therapeutic options may be helpful for properly managing such cervical lesions.
Topics: Female; Humans; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms; Papillomaviridae; Papillomavirus Infections; Cervix Uteri; Adenocarcinoma; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
PubMed: 36499345
DOI: 10.3390/ijms232315022 -
JAMA Oct 2019Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is a serious disease caused by abnormal cells in the pancreas that divide and grow out of control, forming a tumor.
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is a serious disease caused by abnormal cells in the pancreas that divide and grow out of control, forming a tumor.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Combined Modality Therapy; Humans; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Risk Factors
PubMed: 31593274
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.14699 -
Journal of Thoracic Oncology : Official... Oct 2020A grading system for pulmonary adenocarcinoma has not been established. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer pathology panel evaluated a set of...
INTRODUCTION
A grading system for pulmonary adenocarcinoma has not been established. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer pathology panel evaluated a set of histologic criteria associated with prognosis aimed at establishing a grading system for invasive pulmonary adenocarcinoma.
METHODS
A multi-institutional study involving multiple cohorts of invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas was conducted. A cohort of 284 stage I pulmonary adenocarcinomas was used as a training set to identify histologic features associated with patient outcomes (recurrence-free survival [RFS] and overall survival [OS]). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to select the best model, which was validated (n = 212) and tested (n = 300, including stage I-III) in independent cohorts. Reproducibility of the model was assessed using kappa statistics.
RESULTS
The best model (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.749 for RFS and 0.787 for OS) was composed of a combination of predominant plus high-grade histologic pattern with a cutoff of 20% for the latter. The model consists of the following: grade 1, lepidic predominant tumor; grade 2, acinar or papillary predominant tumor, both with no or less than 20% of high-grade patterns; and grade 3, any tumor with 20% or more of high-grade patterns (solid, micropapillary, or complex gland). Similar results were seen in the validation (AUC = 0.732 for RFS and 0.787 for OS) and test cohorts (AUC = 0.690 for RFS and 0.743 for OS), confirming the predictive value of the model. Interobserver reproducibility revealed good agreement (k = 0.617).
CONCLUSIONS
A grading system based on the predominant and high-grade patterns is practical and prognostic for invasive pulmonary adenocarcinoma.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adenocarcinoma of Lung; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Neoplasm Staging; Prognosis; Reproducibility of Results; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 32562873
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.06.001 -
Journal of Thoracic Oncology : Official... Aug 2021The WHO classification of lung tumors defines adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) as cancers with no or limited histologic invasive...
INTRODUCTION
The WHO classification of lung tumors defines adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) as cancers with no or limited histologic invasive components. The probability of patients with AIS or MIA being recurrence free for 5 years postoperatively has been found to be 100%. This study aimed to analyze the prognosis of patients with AIS or MIA after more than 5 postoperative years.
METHODS
We reviewed the pathologic findings of 4768 patients who underwent resection for lung cancer between 1998 and 2010. Of these, 524 patients with curative resection for AIS (207 cases, 39.5%) and MIA (317 cases, 60.5%) were included. Postoperative recurrence, survival, and development of secondary primary lung cancer (SPLC) were analyzed.
RESULTS
Of the included patients, 342 (65.3%) were of female sex, 333 (63.5%) were nonsmokers, and 229 (43.7%) underwent sublobar resection. Average pathologic total tumor diameter was 15.2 plus or minus 5.5 mm. Median postoperative follow-up period was 100 months (range: 1-237). No recurrence of lung cancer was observed for either AIS or MIA cases. Estimated 10-year postoperative disease-specific survival rates were 100% and 100% (p = 0.72), and overall survival rates were 95.3% and 97.8% (p = 0.94) for AIS and MIA cases, respectively. Estimated incidence rates of metachronous SPLC at 10 years after surgery were 5.6% and 7.7% for AIS and MIA, respectively (p = 0.45), and these were not correlated with the EGFR mutation status.
CONCLUSIONS
Although the development of metachronous SPLC should be noted, the risk of recurrence is quite low at more than 5 years after resection of AIS and MIA. This finding strengthens the clinical value of distinguishing AIS and MIA from other adenocarcinomas of the lung.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adenocarcinoma in Situ; Adenocarcinoma of Lung; Female; Humans; Lung; Lung Neoplasms; Neoplasm Invasiveness; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 33915249
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.04.007