-
Clinical Medicine (London, England) May 2021Psoriasis is a clinically heterogeneous lifelong skin disease that presents in multiple forms such as plaque, flexural, guttate, pustular or erythrodermic. An estimated...
Psoriasis is a clinically heterogeneous lifelong skin disease that presents in multiple forms such as plaque, flexural, guttate, pustular or erythrodermic. An estimated 60 million people have psoriasis worldwide, with 1.52% of the general population affected in the UK. An immune-mediated inflammatory disease, psoriasis has a major genetic component. Its association with psoriatic arthritis and increased rates of cardiometabolic, hepatic and psychological comorbidity requires a holistic and multidisciplinary care approach. Psoriasis treatments include topical agents (vitamin D analogues and corticosteroids), phototherapy (narrowband ultraviolet B radiation (NB-UVB) and psoralen and ultraviolet A radiation (PUVA)), standard systemic (methotrexate, ciclosporin and acitretin), biologic (tumour necrosis factor (TNF), interleukin (IL)-17 and IL-23 inhibitors) or small molecule inhibitor (dimethyl fumarate and apremilast) therapies. Advances in the understanding of its pathophysiology have led to development of highly effective and targeted treatments.
Topics: Acitretin; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Methotrexate; Phototherapy; Psoriasis
PubMed: 34001566
DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.2021-0257 -
Cell Research Apr 2020The growing field of immunometabolism has taught us how metabolic cellular reactions and processes not only provide a means to generate ATP and biosynthetic precursors,... (Review)
Review
The growing field of immunometabolism has taught us how metabolic cellular reactions and processes not only provide a means to generate ATP and biosynthetic precursors, but are also a way of controlling immunity and inflammation. Metabolic reprogramming of immune cells is essential for both inflammatory as well as anti-inflammatory responses. Four anti-inflammatory therapies, DMF, Metformin, Methotrexate and Rapamycin all work by affecting metabolism and/or regulating or mimicking endogenous metabolites with anti-inflammatory effects. Evidence is emerging for the targeting of specific metabolic events as a strategy to limit inflammation in different contexts. Here we discuss these recent developments and speculate on the prospect of targeting immunometabolism in the effort to develop novel anti-inflammatory therapeutics. As accumulating evidence for roles of an intricate and elaborate network of metabolic processes, including lipid, amino acid and nucleotide metabolism provides key focal points for developing new therapies, we here turn our attention to glycolysis and the TCA cycle to provide examples of how metabolic intermediates and enzymes can provide potential novel therapeutic targets.
Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Autoimmune Diseases; Dimethyl Fumarate; Glycolysis; Humans; Immunomodulation; Immunosuppressive Agents; Inflammation; Metformin; Methotrexate; Sirolimus
PubMed: 32132672
DOI: 10.1038/s41422-020-0291-z -
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy =... Jun 2022Methotrexate (MTX) has been used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for about forty years and to date MTX remains the part of global standard of treatment... (Review)
Review
Methotrexate (MTX) has been used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for about forty years and to date MTX remains the part of global standard of treatment for RA. The efficacy of MTX in RA is the result of multiple mechanisms of action. In order to summarize the possible pharmacological mechanisms of MTX in the treatment of RA, this review will elaborate on folate antagonism, promotion of adenosine accumulation, regulation of inflammatory signaling pathways, bone protection and maintenance of immune system function.
Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Methotrexate
PubMed: 35658215
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.113074 -
ARP Rheumatology Oct 2022Methotrexate (MTX) is an anti-folate drug with anti-proliferative and anti-inflammatory effects. MTX proved to be the most highly effective, fast-acting disease... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Methotrexate (MTX) is an anti-folate drug with anti-proliferative and anti-inflammatory effects. MTX proved to be the most highly effective, fast-acting disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD), being widely used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This review aims to describe the main genetic variants identified concerning proteins that play a role in methotrexate's kinetics and efficiency profile.
METHODS
A literature review was conducted since January of 2000 until December 2020, by searching the PubMed and Embase bibliographic databases, employing the following MeSH terms: methotrexate, pharmacogenetics, pharmacokinetics, and rheumatoid arthritis. The search was limited to articles in English language. Two independent reviewers screened the titles and abstracts followed by a full-text review to assess papers regarding their eligibility. A total of 48 articles matched the research criteria and were analyzed.
RESULTS
Reduced folate carrier 1 (RFC1), a constitutively expressed folate transport protein that has high affinity for MTX is responsible, almost exclusively, for the transport of folate and MTX into the cell. The most studied variant of the gene is the 80G>A variant, mapped within exon 2, on chromosome 21. It seems to improve RA responses to MTX, clinical efficacy with long disease remission. ABC transporters are involved in the efflux of MTX from cells. An increased expression and function of these transporters should decrease MTX concentrations in target cells, resulting in lack of therapeutic response. ABCB1 3435 C/T is a high frequency polymorphism, significantly associated with RA good responses, symptom remission and reduced adverse events, due to MTX treatment. Thymidylate synthase (TYMS) is involved in thymidine synthesis. MTX decreases TYMS activity by inhibition and decreasing the access to tetrahydrofolate (THF) cofactors. The most common genetic variant of the TYMS gene consists of a 28 bp tandem repeat, with double and triple number of repeats (2R and 3R). The 3R allele genotype was associated with decreased efficacy and increased toxicity. The 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) enzyme is indirectly inhibited by MTX. The most common SNPs of the MTHFR gene are C677T and A1298C. Both are associated with a decreased efficacy and an increased toxicity of MTX.
CONCLUSION
MTX response is affected by many gene variants; the effect of each variant separately is likely to be small. Additionally, gene-gene interaction seems to enhance the potential role of linkage disequilibrium. This shows the emerging need for a better gene characterization and to improve the knowledge about variants distribution according to ethnicity, to explain different responses to MTX at an individual level.
Topics: Humans; Methotrexate; Pharmacogenetics; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Antirheumatic Agents; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Folic Acid
PubMed: 35724450
DOI: No ID Found -
International Journal of Molecular... Oct 2019Methotrexate (MTX) is the first line drug for the treatment of a number of rheumatic and non-rheumatic disorders. It is currently used as an anchor disease, modifying... (Review)
Review
Methotrexate (MTX) is the first line drug for the treatment of a number of rheumatic and non-rheumatic disorders. It is currently used as an anchor disease, modifying anti-rheumatic drug in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Despite the development of numerous new targeted therapies, MTX remains the backbone of RA therapy due to its potent efficacy and tolerability. There has been also a growing interest in the use of MTX in the treatment of chronic viral mediated arthritis. Many viruses-including old world alphaviruses, Parvovirus B19, hepatitis B/C virus, and human immunodeficiency virus-have been associated with arthritogenic diseases and reminiscent of RA. MTX may provide benefits although with the potential risk of attenuating patients' immune surveillance capacities. In this review, we describe the emerging mechanisms of action of MTX as an anti-inflammatory drug and complementing its well-established immunomodulatory activity. The mechanisms involve adenosine signaling modulation, alteration of cytokine networks, generation of reactive oxygen species and HMGB1 alarmin suppression. We also provide a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms of MTX toxic effects. Lastly, we discussed the efficacy, as well as the safety, of MTX used in the management of viral-related rheumatic syndromes.
Topics: Adenosine; Alarmins; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cytokines; Folic Acid; HMGB1 Protein; Humans; Immunity, Innate; Inflammation; Matrix Metalloproteinases; Methotrexate; NF-kappa B; Polyamines; Prostaglandins; Reactive Oxygen Species
PubMed: 31658782
DOI: 10.3390/ijms20205023 -
ARP Rheumatology Oct 2022We aim to summarize the relevant evidence and provide guidance for perioperative management of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and other immunomodulators... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
We aim to summarize the relevant evidence and provide guidance for perioperative management of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and other immunomodulators used in the treatment of the various inflammatory rheumatic diseases in patients submitted to elective surgery.
METHODS
This is a review article directed towards clinical practice, based on recent literature available in PubMed database, as well as guidelines published by Rheumatology Societies.
RESULTS
Treatment with conventional DMARDs (methotrexate, hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine and leflunomide) can be continued perioperatively; targeted synthetic DMARDs should be suspended at least 3 to 7 days before surgery, depending on the drug, and restarted 3-5 days after the procedure, while biologic DMARDs should be withheld a dosing cycle prior to surgery and resumed at least 14 days after the procedure, with evidence of complete wound healing. In the case of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), one should consider the severity of the condition to make the decision about discontinuing immunomodulators (mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, cyclosporine, or tacrolimus) as these should be continued in severe SLE because of the increased risk of life-threatening flares. The usual dose of glucocorticoids should be continued perioperatively; however, elective procedures with high-risk surgical site infection should be postponed in patients under ≥20 mg/day prednisone or equivalent until the inflammatory process is controlled with the minimum effective dose.
CONCLUSIONS
The perioperative management of patients with rheumatic disease under DMARDs or other immunomodulators is challenging but vital for achieving the best outcome possible. A multidisciplinary approach agreed upon by the anesthesiologist, surgeon and rheumatologist is the best strategy for success.
Topics: Humans; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Methotrexate; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic; Immunologic Factors
PubMed: 36057090
DOI: No ID Found -
International Journal of Environmental... Oct 2022Ectopic pregnancy, that is, a blastocyst occurring outside the endometrial cavity of the uterus, affects nearly 2% of pregnancies. The treatment of ectopic pregnancy is... (Review)
Review
Ectopic pregnancy, that is, a blastocyst occurring outside the endometrial cavity of the uterus, affects nearly 2% of pregnancies. The treatment of ectopic pregnancy is surgical or pharmacological. Since surgical management is associated with numerous serious side effects, conservative treatment is sought. The treatment of choice in the majority of cases is based on pharmacotherapy with methotrexate (MTX) in a single- or multi-dose regimen. Although the efficacy of methotrexate reaches between 70 and 90%, its use requires specific conditions regarding both the general condition of the patient and the characteristic features of the ectopic pregnancy. Moreover, MTX can cause severe adverse effects, including stomatitis, hepatotoxicity and myelosuppression. Therefore, clinicians and researchers are still looking for a less toxic, more effective treatment, which could prevent surgeries as a second-choice treatment. Some studies indicate that other substances might constitute a good alternative to methotrexate in the management of ectopic pregnancies. These substances include aromatase inhibitors, especially letrozole. Another promising substance in EP treatment is gefitinib, an inhibitor of EGFR tyrosine domain which, combined with MTX, seems to constitute a more effective alternative in the management of tubal ectopic pregnancies. Other substances for local administration include KCl and absolute ethanol. KCl injections used in combination with MTX may be used when foetal heart function is detected in cervical ectopic pregnancies, as well as in heterotopic pregnancy treatment. Absolute ethanol injections proved successful and safe in caesarean scar pregnancies management. Thus far, little is known about the use of those substances in the treatment of ectopic pregnancies, but already conducted studies seem to be promising.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal; Methotrexate; Pregnancy, Ectopic; Treatment Outcome; Ethanol; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 36361110
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192114230 -
Annals of Internal Medicine Mar 2020Low-dose methotrexate (LD-MTX) is the most commonly used drug for systemic rheumatic diseases worldwide and is the recommended first-line agent for rheumatoid arthritis.... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Low-dose methotrexate (LD-MTX) is the most commonly used drug for systemic rheumatic diseases worldwide and is the recommended first-line agent for rheumatoid arthritis. Despite extensive clinical use for more than 30 years, few data on adverse event (AE) rates derive from randomized, placebo-controlled trials, where both causality and magnitude of risk can be inferred.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate AE rates, risk, and risk differences comparing LD-MTX versus placebo.
DESIGN
Prespecified secondary analyses of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01594333).
SETTING
North America.
PARTICIPANTS
Adults with known cardiovascular disease and diabetes or metabolic syndrome.
INTERVENTION
Random allocation to LD-MTX (≤20 mg/wk) or placebo. All participants received folic acid, 1 mg/d, 6 days per week.
MEASUREMENTS
Risks for specific AEs of interest, as well as for all AEs, were compared across treatment groups after blinded adjudication.
RESULTS
After an active run-in period, 6158 patients were enrolled and 4786 randomly assigned to a group; median follow-up was 23 months and median dosage 15 mg/wk. Among the randomly assigned participants, 81.2% were male, median age was 65.7 years, and median body mass index was 31.5 kg/m2. Of 2391 participants assigned to LD-MTX, 2080 (87.0%) had an AE of interest, compared with 1951 of 2395 (81.5%) assigned to placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 1.17 [95% CI, 1.10 to 1.25]). The relative hazards of gastrointestinal (HR, 1.91 [CI, 1.75 to 2.10]), pulmonary (HR, 1.52 [CI, 1.16 to 1.98]), infectious (HR, 1.15 [CI, 1.01 to 1.30]), and hematologic (HR, 1.15 [CI, 1.07 to 1.23]) AEs were elevated for LD-MTX versus placebo. With the exception of increased risk for skin cancer (HR, 2.05 [CI, 1.28 to 3.28]), the treatment groups did not differ in risk for other cancer or mucocutaneous, neuropsychiatric, or musculoskeletal AEs. Renal AEs were reduced in the LD-MTX group (HR, 0.85 [CI, 0.78 to 0.93]).
LIMITATION
The trial was done in patients without rheumatic disease who tolerated LD-MTX during an active run-in period.
CONCLUSION
Use of LD-MTX was associated with small to moderate elevations in risks for skin cancer and gastrointestinal, infectious, pulmonary, and hematologic AEs, whereas renal AEs were decreased.
PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE
National Institutes of Health.
Topics: Aged; Antirheumatic Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Placebos; Prospective Studies
PubMed: 32066146
DOI: 10.7326/M19-3369 -
Clinical Medicine (London, England) Sep 2019The chikungunya virus (CHIKV) infection epidemic has emerged as a significant public health concern in the last 10-15 years, especially in Asian and south American... (Review)
Review
The chikungunya virus (CHIKV) infection epidemic has emerged as a significant public health concern in the last 10-15 years, especially in Asian and south American countries. However, with ever-expanding tourism and migration, cases have now been reported in north America and Europe. CHIKV infection predominantly causes musculoskeletal symptoms with a chronic polyarthritis which may resemble autoimmune inflammatory arthritis. CHIKV infection should always be suspected in a returning traveller presenting with fever, skin rash and arthralgia. Though first reported in the last century, a series of epidemics since 2004 have substantially improved our knowledge. There has also been a significant increase in our understanding of the immunopathogenesis of chikungunya infection. This knowledge is being used in the development of new treatment strategies and preventive measures. In this narrative review, we discuss some of the recent advances in the epidemiology, immunopathogenesis, and management of CHIKV arthritis.
Topics: Antiviral Agents; Arthritis, Infectious; Chikungunya Fever; Chikungunya virus; Chronic Disease; Humans; Methotrexate
PubMed: 31530685
DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.2019-0035 -
RMD Open Oct 2021In SELECT-PsA 1, a randomised double-blind phase 3 study, upadacitinib 15 mg and 30 mg were superior to placebo and non-inferior to adalimumab in ≥20% improvement... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
In SELECT-PsA 1, a randomised double-blind phase 3 study, upadacitinib 15 mg and 30 mg were superior to placebo and non-inferior to adalimumab in ≥20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria at 12 weeks in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Here, we report 56-week efficacy and safety in patients from SELECT-PsA 1.
METHODS
Patients received upadacitinib 15 mg or 30 mg once daily, adalimumab 40 mg every other week for 56 weeks or placebo through week 24 switched thereafter to upadacitinib 15 mg or 30 mg until week 56. Efficacy endpoints included the proportion of patients achieving ≥20%/50%/70% improvement in ACR criteria (ACR20/50/70), ≥75%/90%/100% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI75/90/100), minimal disease activity (MDA) and change from baseline in modified total Sharp/van der Heijde Score. Treatment-emergent adverse events per 100 patient years (PY) were summarised.
RESULTS
Consistent with results through week 24, ACR20/50/70, PASI75/90/100 and MDA responses were maintained with upadacitinib through week 56 and were generally numerically higher than with adalimumab; inhibition of radiographic progression was also maintained. Patients who switched from placebo to upadacitinib exhibited comparable improvements at week 56 as patients originally randomised to upadacitinib. The rates of serious adverse events were 9.1 events/100 PY with upadacitinib 15 mg and 12.3 events/100 PY with upadacitinib 30 mg. Two deaths were reported in each of the upadacitinib groups.
CONCLUSION
Efficacy across various domains of PsA were maintained with upadacitinib 15 mg and 30 mg through week 56 with no new safety signals observed.
Topics: Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Methotrexate
PubMed: 34663636
DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001838