-
American Family Physician Jun 2021Obstetric lacerations are a common complication of vaginal delivery. Lacerations can lead to chronic pain and urinary and fecal incontinence. Perineal lacerations are... (Review)
Review
Obstetric lacerations are a common complication of vaginal delivery. Lacerations can lead to chronic pain and urinary and fecal incontinence. Perineal lacerations are defined by the depth of musculature involved, with fourth-degree lacerations disrupting the anal sphincter and the underlying rectal mucosa and first-degree lacerations having no perineal muscle involvement. Late third-trimester perineal massage can reduce lacerations in primiparous women; perineal support and massage and warm compresses during the second stage of labor can reduce anal sphincter injury. Conservative care of minor hemostatic first- and second-degree lacerations without anatomic distortion reduces pain, analgesia use, and dyspareunia. Minor hemostatic lesions with anatomic disruption can be repaired with surgical glue. Second-degree lacerations are best repaired with a single continuous suture. Lacerations involving the anal sphincter complex require additional expertise, exposure, and lighting; transfer to an operating room should be considered. Limited evidence suggests similar results from overlapping and end-to-end external sphincter repairs. Postdelivery care should focus on controlling pain, preventing constipation, and monitoring for urinary retention. Acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs should be administered as needed. Opiates should be avoided to decrease risk of constipation; need for opiates suggests infection or problem with the repair. Osmotic laxative use leads to earlier bowel movements and less pain during the first bowel movement. Simulation models are recommended for surgical technique instruction and maintenance, especially for third- and fourth-degree repairs.
Topics: Anal Canal; Delivery, Obstetric; Female; Humans; Injury Severity Score; Lacerations; Pain Management; Perineum; Pregnancy; Vagina
PubMed: 34128615
DOI: No ID Found -
Clinics in Geriatric Medicine Feb 2021Fecal incontinence can be a challenging and stigmatizing disease with a high prevalence in the elderly population. Despite effective treatment options, most patients do... (Review)
Review
Fecal incontinence can be a challenging and stigmatizing disease with a high prevalence in the elderly population. Despite effective treatment options, most patients do not receive care. Clues in the history and physical examination can assist the provider in establishing the diagnosis. Direct inquiry about the presence of incontinence is key. Bowel disturbances are common triggers for symptoms and represent some of the easiest treatment targets. We review the epidemiology and impact of the disease, delineate a diagnostic and treatment approach for primary care physicians to identify patients with suspected fecal incontinence and describe appropriate treatment options.
Topics: Aged; Algorithms; Anal Canal; Diarrhea; Fecal Incontinence; Humans; Lumbosacral Plexus; Pain; Pelvic Floor; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33213775
DOI: 10.1016/j.cger.2020.08.006 -
American Journal of Obstetrics and... Mar 2024Perineal trauma after vaginal birth is common, with approximately 9 of 10 women being affected. Second-degree perineal tears are twice as likely to occur in primiparous... (Review)
Review
Perineal trauma after vaginal birth is common, with approximately 9 of 10 women being affected. Second-degree perineal tears are twice as likely to occur in primiparous births, with a incidence of 40%. The incidence of obstetrical anal sphincter injury is approximately 3%, with a significantly higher rate in primiparous than in multiparous women (6% vs 2%). Obstetrical anal sphincter injury is a significant risk factor for the development of anal incontinence, with approximately 10% of women developing symptoms within a year following vaginal birth. Obstetrical anal sphincter injuries have significant medicolegal implications and contribute greatly to healthcare costs. For example, in 2013 and 2014, the economic burden of obstetrical anal sphincter injuries in the United Kingdom ranged between £3.7 million (with assisted vaginal birth) and £9.8 million (with spontaneous vaginal birth). In the United States, complications associated with trauma to the perineum incurred costs of approximately $83 million between 2007 and 2011. It is therefore crucial to focus on improvements in clinical care to reduce this risk and minimize the development of perineal trauma, particularly obstetrical anal sphincter injuries. Identification of risk factors allows modification of obstetrical practice with the aim of reducing the rate of perineal trauma and its attendant associated morbidity. Risk factors associated with second-degree perineal trauma include increased fetal birthweight, operative vaginal birth, prolonged second stage of labor, maternal birth position, and advanced maternal age. With obstetrical anal sphincter injury, risk factors include induction of labor, augmentation of labor, epidural, increased fetal birthweight, fetal malposition (occiput posterior), midline episiotomy, operative vaginal birth, Asian ethnicity, and primiparity. Obstetrical practice can be modified both antenatally and intrapartum. The evidence suggests that in the antenatal period, perineal massage can be commenced in the third trimester of pregnancy to increase muscle elasticity and allow stretching of the perineum during birth, thereby reducing the risk of tearing or need for episiotomy. With regard to the intrapartum period, there is a growing body of evidence from the United Kingdom, Norway, and Denmark suggesting that the implementation of quality improvement initiatives including the training of clinicians in manual perineal protection and mediolateral episiotomy can reduce the incidence of obstetrical anal sphincter injury. With episiotomy, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics recommends restrictive rather than routine use of episiotomy. This is particularly the case with unassisted vaginal births. However, there is a role for episiotomy, specifically mediolateral or lateral, with assisted vaginal births. This is specifically the case with nulliparous vacuum and forceps births, given that the use of mediolateral or lateral episiotomy has been shown to significantly reduce the incidence of obstetrical anal sphincter injury in these groups by 43% and 68%, respectively. However, the complications associated with episiotomy including perineal pain, dyspareunia, and sexual dysfunction should be acknowledged. Despite considerable research, interventions for reducing the risk of perineal trauma remain a subject of controversy. In this review article, we present the available data on the prevention of perineal trauma by describing the risk factors associated with perineal trauma and interventions that can be implemented to prevent perineal trauma, in particular obstetrical anal sphincter injury.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Birth Weight; Episiotomy; Parity; Parturition; Lacerations; Anal Canal; Risk Factors; Perineum; Obstetric Labor Complications
PubMed: 37635056
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.06.021 -
Current Gastroenterology Reports Sep 2020Objective measurement of anorectal sensorimotor function is a requisite component in the clinical evaluation of patients with intractable symptoms of anorectal... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
Objective measurement of anorectal sensorimotor function is a requisite component in the clinical evaluation of patients with intractable symptoms of anorectal dysfunction. Regrettably, the utility of the most established and widely employed investigations for such measurement (anorectal manometry (ARM), rectal sensory testing and the balloon expulsion test) has been limited by wide variations in clinical practice.
RECENT FINDINGS
This article summarizes the recently published International Anorectal Physiology Working Group (IAPWG) consensus and London Classification of anorectal disorders, together with relevant allied literature, to provide guidance on the indications for, equipment, protocol, measurement definitions and results interpretation for ARM, rectal sensory testing and the balloon expulsion test. The London Classification is a standardized method and nomenclature for description of alterations in anorectal motor and sensory function using office-based investigations, adoption of which should bring much needed harmonization of practice.
Topics: Anal Canal; Anus Diseases; Humans; Manometry; Rectal Diseases; Terminology as Topic
PubMed: 32935278
DOI: 10.1007/s11894-020-00793-z -
Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and... Sep 2019The objective of these clinical practice guidelines was to analyse all of the interventions during pregnancy and childbirth that might prevent obstetric anal sphincter...
INTRODUCTION
The objective of these clinical practice guidelines was to analyse all of the interventions during pregnancy and childbirth that might prevent obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) and postnatal pelvic floor symptoms.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
These guidelines were developed in accordance with the methods prescribed by the French Health Authority (HAS).
RESULTS
A prenatal clinical examination of the perineum is recommended for women with a history of Crohn's disease, OASIS, genital mutilation, or perianal lesions (professional consensus). Just after delivery, a perineal examination is recommended to check for OASIS (Grade B); if there is doubt about the diagnosis, a second opinion should be requested (Grade C). In case of OASIS, the injuries (including their severity) and the technique for their repair should be described in detail (Grade C). Perineal massage during pregnancy must be encouraged among women who want it (Grade B). No intervention conducted before the start of the active phase of the second stage of labour has been shown to be effective in reducing the risk of perineal injury. The crowning of the baby's head should be manually controlled and the posterior perineum manually supported to reduce the risk of OASIS (Grade C). The performance of an episiotomy during normal deliveries is not recommended to reduce the risk of OASIS (Grade A). In instrumental deliveries, episiotomy may be indicated to avoid OASIS (Grade C). When an episiotomy is performed, a mediolateral incision is recommended (Grade B). The indication for episiotomy should be explained to the woman, and she should consent before its performance. Advising women to have a caesarean delivery for primary prevention of postnatal urinary or anal incontinence is not recommended (Grade B). During pregnancy and again in the labour room, obstetrics professionals should focus on the woman's expectations and inform her about the modes of delivery.
Topics: Anal Canal; Delivery, Obstetric; Episiotomy; Female; Gynecology; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Lacerations; Obstetrics; Parturition; Perineum; Pregnancy; Risk Factors; Societies, Medical
PubMed: 30553051
DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2018.12.002 -
La Clinica Terapeutica Nov 2021Haemorrhoids are considered among the most frequent proctologi-cal condition at a general practitioner (GP) practice. Acute prolapse of internal haemorrhoids is...
Haemorrhoids are considered among the most frequent proctologi-cal condition at a general practitioner (GP) practice. Acute prolapse of internal haemorrhoids is presented with oedema, inflammation and acute pain. The application of granulated sugar on swollen hae-morrhoids leads to an immediate reduction of their edema and to the patient's relief. After the topical application of sugar, haemorrhoids begin to shrink immediately and edema is drastically reduced, while haemorrhoidal tissue can easily retracted back into the anal canal. The method is a cheap, quick and painless way to control the worsening symptoms such as swelling, bleeding and irritation. In addition, this method can easily be applied in the GP practice without the necessity of any form of anaesthesia.
Topics: Anal Canal; Hemorrhoids; Humans; Ligation; Pain; Sugars
PubMed: 34821343
DOI: 10.7417/CT.2021.2369 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2022For locally advanced (T3-4/N+M0) rectal cancer (LARC), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) is the standard treatment. It was... (Review)
Review
For locally advanced (T3-4/N+M0) rectal cancer (LARC), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) is the standard treatment. It was demonstrated to decrease the local recurrence rate and increase the tumor response grade. However, the distant metastasis remains an unresolved issue. And the demand for anus preservation and better quality of life increases in recent years. Radiotherapy and immunotherapy can be supplement to each other and the combination of the two treatments has a good theoretical basis. Recently, multiple clinical trials are ongoing in terms of the combination of nCRT and immunotherapy in LARC. It was reported that these trials achieved promising short-term efficacy in both MSI-H and MSS rectal cancers, which could further improve the rate of clinical complete response (cCR) and pathological complete response (pCR), so that increase the possibility of 'Watch and Wait (W&W)' approach. However, the cCR and pCR is not always consistent, which occurs more frequent when nCRT is combined with immunotherapy. Thus, the efficacy evaluation after neoadjuvant therapy is an important issue for patient selection of W&W approach. Evaluating the cCR accurately needs the combination of multiple traditional examinations, new detective methods, such as PET-CT, ctDNA-MRD and various omics studies. And finding accurate biomarkers can help guide the risk stratification and treatment decisions. And large-scale clinical trials need to be performed in the future to demonstrate the surprising efficacy and to explore the long-term prognosis.
Topics: Humans; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Anal Canal; Treatment Outcome; Quality of Life; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Chemoradiotherapy; Rectal Neoplasms; Immunotherapy
PubMed: 36569918
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1067036 -
Ugeskrift For Laeger Sep 2021Cryptoglandular anal fistulas (AF) cause recurrent anal abscesses and patients risk multiple surgeries due to low healing rates of sphincter-saving procedures. Knowledge... (Review)
Review
Cryptoglandular anal fistulas (AF) cause recurrent anal abscesses and patients risk multiple surgeries due to low healing rates of sphincter-saving procedures. Knowledge of anal anatomy and imaging with MRI or endoanal sonography is crucial to classify AF as simple or complex depending on risk of anal incontinence after fistulotomy as summarised in this review. Fistulotomy has healing rates of > 90%, risks incontinence, and the procedure is reserved for simple fistulas. Complex AF are treated with a draining seton and then with sphincter-saving procedures which have long-term healing rates of about 50%.
Topics: Anal Canal; Fecal Incontinence; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Rectal Fistula; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34498577
DOI: No ID Found -
Neurogastroenterology and Motility Jan 2020This manuscript summarizes consensus reached by the International Anorectal Physiology Working Group (IAPWG) for the performance, terminology used, and interpretation of...
The international anorectal physiology working group (IAPWG) recommendations: Standardized testing protocol and the London classification for disorders of anorectal function.
BACKGROUND
This manuscript summarizes consensus reached by the International Anorectal Physiology Working Group (IAPWG) for the performance, terminology used, and interpretation of anorectal function testing including anorectal manometry (focused on high-resolution manometry), the rectal sensory test, and the balloon expulsion test. Based on these measurements, a classification system for disorders of anorectal function is proposed.
METHODS
Twenty-nine working group members (clinicians/academics in the field of gastroenterology, coloproctology, and gastrointestinal physiology) were invited to six face-to-face and three remote meetings to derive consensus between 2014 and 2018.
KEY RECOMMENDATIONS
The IAPWG protocol for the performance of anorectal function testing recommends a standardized sequence of maneuvers to test rectoanal reflexes, anal tone and contractility, rectoanal coordination, and rectal sensation. Major findings not seen in healthy controls defined by the classification are as follows: rectoanal areflexia, anal hypotension and hypocontractility, rectal hyposensitivity, and hypersensitivity. Minor and inconclusive findings that can be present in health and require additional information prior to diagnosis include anal hypertension and dyssynergia.
CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES
This framework introduces the IAPWG protocol and the London classification for disorders of anorectal function based on objective physiological measurement. The use of a common language to describe results of diagnostic tests, standard operating procedures, and a consensus classification system is designed to bring much-needed standardization to these techniques.
Topics: Anal Canal; Gastroenterology; Humans; Intestinal Diseases; Manometry
PubMed: 31407463
DOI: 10.1111/nmo.13679 -
Ugeskrift For Laeger Feb 2023Anal cancer risk is increased in certain risk groups including people living with HIV (PLWH), especially in men who have sex with men, but also in organ transplant... (Review)
Review
Anal cancer risk is increased in certain risk groups including people living with HIV (PLWH), especially in men who have sex with men, but also in organ transplant recipients and women with a history of cervical or vulva dysplasia or cancer. High-resolution anoscopy (HRA) is a tool to diagnose anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL), and HRA-guided treatment of anal HSIL has been shown to reduce the risk of anal cancer in PLWH. The purpose of this review is to increase the awareness of HRA but also of tertiary prevention by digital anal rectal examination.
Topics: Male; Humans; Female; Homosexuality, Male; Sexual and Gender Minorities; Risk Factors; Endoscopy; Anus Neoplasms; Anal Canal; HIV Infections; Papillomavirus Infections
PubMed: 36896618
DOI: No ID Found