-
Acta Cytologica 2023The World Health Organization (WHO), the International Academy of Cytology, and the International Agency for Research on Cancer, with expert contributors from around the... (Review)
Review
The World Health Organization (WHO), the International Academy of Cytology, and the International Agency for Research on Cancer, with expert contributors from around the world, present an international approach to standardized reporting of pancreaticobiliary cytopathology. This reporting system is one of the first in a series from various body sites that mirror the WHO Classification of Tumours series and provides an evidence-based terminology system with associated risk of malignancy and diagnostic management recommendation per diagnostic category. The WHO Reporting System for Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology (WHO system) revises the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) system for Reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytology published in 2015 and replaces the six-tiered system with a seven-tiered system: "insufficient/inadequate/nondiagnostic"; "benign (negative for malignancy)," "atypical," "pancreaticobiliary neoplasm of low risk/low grade," "pancreatic neoplasm of high risk/high grade," "suspicious for malignancy," and "malignant." The principal differences between the WHO and the PSC systems revolve around the classification of neoplasia. In the PSC system, there was a single category for "neoplastic" lesions that includes two groups, one for "benign neoplasms" [primarily serous cystadenoma] and one named "other," dominated by premalignant intraductal neoplasms (primarily intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms) and low-grade malignant neoplasms [pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) and solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs)]. In the WHO system, benign neoplasms with virtually no risk of malignancy are included in the "benign" category and low-grade malignancies (PanNET and SPN) are included in the "malignant" category, as per the WHO Classification of Digestive System Tumours, thus leaving in the "neoplasm" category primarily those noninvasive premalignant lesions of the ductal system. These neoplasms are divided by the cytomorphological grade of the epithelium into low risk/low-grade and high risk/high-grade, with distinctly different risks of malignancy. As with the PSC system, the WHO system advocates close correlation with imaging and encourages incorporation of ancillary testing into the final diagnosis, such as biochemical (CEA and amylase) and molecular testing of cyst fluid and bile duct brushings. Key diagnostic cytopathological features of specific lesions or neoplasms, ancillary studies for diagnostic and prognostic evaluation, and implications of diagnosis for patient care and management are discussed. In addition, the WHO system includes reporting and diagnostic management options that recognize the variations in the availability of diagnostic and prognostic ancillary testing modalities in low- and middle-income countries, where cytopathology is particularly useful and is increasingly available in the absence of histopathological services.
Topics: Humans; Societies, Medical; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Precancerous Conditions; Cytodiagnosis
PubMed: 36516741
DOI: 10.1159/000527912 -
Surgical Pathology Clinics Jun 2021PRAME (PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma) is a melanoma-associated antigen expressed in cutaneous and ocular melanomas and some other malignant neoplasms,... (Review)
Review
PRAME (PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma) is a melanoma-associated antigen expressed in cutaneous and ocular melanomas and some other malignant neoplasms, while its expression in normal tissue and benign tumors is limited. Detection of PRAME protein expression by immunohistochemistry in a cohort of 400 melanocytic tumors showed diffuse nuclear immunoreactivity for PRAME in most metastatic and primary melanomas. In contrast, most nevi were negative for PRAME or showed nondiffuse immunoreactivity. The difference in the extent of immunoreactivity for PRAME in unambiguous melanocytic tumors prompted the study of PRAME as an ancillary tool for evaluating melanocytic lesions in more challenging scenarios.
Topics: Antigens, Neoplasm; Humans; Immunohistochemistry; Melanoma; Skin Neoplasms
PubMed: 34023098
DOI: 10.1016/j.path.2021.01.001 -
RoFo : Fortschritte Auf Dem Gebiete Der... Jun 2023The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS v2018) standardizes the interpretation and reporting of MDCT and MRI examinations in patients at risk for... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS v2018) standardizes the interpretation and reporting of MDCT and MRI examinations in patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
For focal liver lesions (called "observations") it assigns categories (LR-1 to 5, LR-M, LR-TIV, LR-TR), which reflect the probability of benignity or malignancy (HCC or other non-HCC malignancies) of the respective observation. The categories assigned are based on major and ancillary image features, which have been developed by the American College of Radiology (ACR), revised several times (now v2018), and validated in many studies. The value of ancillary features to modify LI-RADS categories assigned to observations based on major features is shown.
RESULTS
This review summarizes the relevant CT and MRI features and presents a step-by-step approach for readers not familiar with LI-RADS on how to use the system. Relevant imaging features and the value of different modalities (contrast-enhanced CT, MRI with extracellular gadolinium chelates or liver-specific contrast agents) is explained.
CONCLUSION
The widespread adoption of LI-RADS for CT/MRI reporting in high-risk patients would help to reduce inter-reader variability. It could improve communication between radiologists, oncologists, hepatologists, pathologists, and liver surgeons, and lead to better patient management.
KEY POINTS
· LI-RADS has been developed and revised to address the need for improved diagnosis and standardized categorization of findings in chronic liver disease.. · CT/MRI LI-RADS consists of major criteria and ancillary features to classify observations.. · LI-RADS terminology helps to clarify the communication of liver observations between radiologists and referring physicians..
CITATION FORMAT
· Schima W, Kopf H, Eisenhuber E. LI-RADS made Easy. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2023; 195: 486 - 494.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Liver Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Contrast Media; Sensitivity and Specificity
PubMed: 36724803
DOI: 10.1055/a-1990-5924 -
JAMA Oncology Apr 2021Decipher (Decipher Biosciences Inc) is a genomic classifier (GC) developed to estimate the risk of distant metastasis (DM) after radical prostatectomy (RP) in patients... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
IMPORTANCE
Decipher (Decipher Biosciences Inc) is a genomic classifier (GC) developed to estimate the risk of distant metastasis (DM) after radical prostatectomy (RP) in patients with prostate cancer.
OBJECTIVE
To validate the GC in the context of a randomized phase 3 trial.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
This ancillary study used RP specimens from the phase 3 placebo-controlled NRG/RTOG 9601 randomized clinical trial conducted from March 1998 to March 2003. The specimens were centrally reviewed, and RNA was extracted from the highest-grade tumor available in 2019 with a median follow-up of 13 years. Clinical-grade whole transcriptomes from samples passing quality control were assigned GC scores (scale, 0-1). A National Clinical Trials Network-approved prespecified statistical plan included the primary objective of validating the independent prognostic ability of GC for DM, with secondary end points of prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) and overall survival (OS). Data were analyzed from September 2019 to December 2019.
INTERVENTION
Salvage radiotherapy (sRT) with or without 2 years of bicalutamide.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The preplanned primary end point of this study was the independent association of the GC with the development of DM.
RESULTS
In this ancillary study of specimens from a phase 3 randomized clinical trial, GC scores were generated from 486 of 760 randomized patients with a median follow-up of 13 years; samples from a total of 352 men (median [interquartile range] age, 64.5 (60-70) years; 314 White [89.2%] participants) passed microarray quality control and comprised the final cohort for analysis. On multivariable analysis, the GC (continuous variable, per 0.1 unit) was independently associated with DM (hazard ratio [HR], 1.17; 95% CI, 1.05-1.32; P = .006), PCSM (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.20-1.63; P < .001), and OS (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.06-1.29; P = .002) after adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, Gleason score, T stage, margin status, entry prostate-specific antigen, and treatment arm. Although the original planned analysis was not powered to detect a treatment effect interaction by GC score, the estimated absolute effect of bicalutamide on 12-year OS was less when comparing patients with lower vs higher GC scores (2.4% vs 8.9%), which was further demonstrated in men receiving early sRT at a prostate-specific antigen level lower than 0.7 ng/mL (-7.8% vs 4.6%).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
This ancillary validation study of the Decipher GC in a randomized trial cohort demonstrated association of the GC with DM, PCSM, and OS independent of standard clinicopathologic variables. These results suggest that not all men with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer after surgery benefit equally from the addition of hormone therapy to sRT.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00002874.
Topics: Aged; Anilides; Follow-Up Studies; Genomics; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Grading; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Nitriles; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatectomy; Prostatic Neoplasms; Tosyl Compounds
PubMed: 33570548
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.7671 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Mar 2022Carpal tunnel release is one of the most commonly performed upper extremity procedures. The majority of patients experience significant improvement or resolution of... (Review)
Review
Carpal tunnel release is one of the most commonly performed upper extremity procedures. The majority of patients experience significant improvement or resolution of their symptoms. However, a small but important subset of patients will experience the failure of their initial surgery. These patients can be grouped into persistent, recurrent, and new symptom categories. The approach to these patients starts with a thorough clinical examination and is supplemented with electrodiagnostic studies. The step-wise surgical management of revision carpal tunnel surgery consists of the proximal exploration of the median nerve, Guyon's release with neurolysis, the rerelease of the transverse retinaculum, evaluation of the nerve injury, treatment of secondary sites of compression, and potential ancillary procedures. The approach and management of failed carpal tunnel release are reviewed in this article.
PubMed: 35268477
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11051386 -
Modern Pathology : An Official Journal... Jan 2022Most pathologists are well versed in the diagnosis of lung cancer, given the common nature of the disease. Occasionally more unusual neoplasms are encountered in lung... (Review)
Review
Most pathologists are well versed in the diagnosis of lung cancer, given the common nature of the disease. Occasionally more unusual neoplasms are encountered in lung biopsies and resections, which may be difficult to distinguish from "run of the mill" lung cancer cases based on overlapping morphologic and immunophenotypic features. The accurate diagnosis of these rare entities is quite challenging and requires careful morphological examination paired with judicious use of ancillary immunohistochemical and genetic studies. Herein, the clinicopathological and genetic features of five unusual lung tumors will be reviewed, including thoracic SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumor, NUT carcinoma, sclerosing pneumocytoma, primary pulmonary myxoid sarcoma/angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma, and bronchiolar adenoma/ ciliated muconodular papillary tumor. Since recognition of these entities by pathologists is of increasing importance to guide prognosis and therapy, emphasis will be placed on practical tips to reach these rare diagnoses with confidence.
Topics: Biomarkers, Tumor; DNA Helicases; Humans; Lung; Lung Neoplasms; Nuclear Proteins; Prognosis; Transcription Factors
PubMed: 34518633
DOI: 10.1038/s41379-021-00914-7