-
GMS Ophthalmology Cases 2020To report two cases of vitreous cysts with discussion of their pathophysiology and management. Clinical examination with fundus photography, ultrasound and optical...
To report two cases of vitreous cysts with discussion of their pathophysiology and management. Clinical examination with fundus photography, ultrasound and optical coherence tomography. Histopathology was performed in the first case. The first case illustrates a pigmented, free-floating cyst, which was removed during a 27-gauge vitrectomy. The histopathology shows a single layer of pigmented epithelium and confirms the previously reported presence of a PAS-positive basement membrane. The second case shows a sessile, non-pigmented cyst associated with significant anisometropia. Primary vitreous cysts are rare and can have a wide range in their clinical aspect. This likely reflects whether they originate either from the pigment epithelium or the primary hyaloidal system. The management of vitreous cysts is mostly conservative, but pars plana vitrectomy can be used safely if the symptoms are debilitating.
PubMed: 32676263
DOI: 10.3205/oc000145 -
Journal of Binocular Vision and Ocular... 2019Anisometropic amblyopia is unilateral by definition and current treatment recommendations reflect that characteristic. However, recent research suggests a binocular... (Review)
Review
Anisometropic amblyopia is unilateral by definition and current treatment recommendations reflect that characteristic. However, recent research suggests a binocular component that deserves consideration. The aim of this review is to consider the levels of anisometropia deemed amblyogenic, and the cortical changes that occur in the presence of anisometropic amblyopia. Particular attention is given to cortical changes that impact the binocularity of these individuals. Knowledge of binocular deficits in anisometropic amblyopia has implications for current, accepted treatment regimens which are monocular in nature. Therefore, the integrity of binocular function in anisometropic amblyopia and its impact on the visual outcome will be evaluated. Given the rise in binocular treatments under clinical trial for amblyopia, this review also aims to evaluate the evidence of potentially enhanced benefits to anisometropic amblyopes from proposed new binocular therapies.
Topics: Amblyopia; Contrast Sensitivity; Humans; Vision, Binocular; Visual Acuity; Visual Cortex
PubMed: 31486743
DOI: 10.1080/2576117X.2019.1656034 -
The British and Irish Orthoptic Journal 2020Clinically, aniseikonia (a perceived difference in shape and image size between the eyes) is often neglected in anisometropic amblyopia due to assumed measurement...
PURPOSE
Clinically, aniseikonia (a perceived difference in shape and image size between the eyes) is often neglected in anisometropic amblyopia due to assumed measurement difficulties. Therefore, we currently lack evidence on whether correction of aniseikonia is beneficial. This study aimed to determine whether subjective aniseikonia is measurable in anisometropia with or without amblyopia.
METHODS
Participants (15-52 years) with Anisometropic Amblyopia (n = 7), Anisometropia without amblyopia (n = 6) and Isometropic Controls (n = 6) were recruited. Subjective aniseikonia was measured using three clinical techniques: Robertson Technique (RT) (penlight and Maddox rod), Aniseikonia Inspector Version 3 (AI3), and the New Aniseikonia Test booklet (NAT), and a psychophysical adaptive method, the Contrast-balanced Aniseikonia Test (CAT), where dichoptic contrast adjustments compensate for any suppression.
RESULTS
Eighteen participants completed all tests, one Anisometropic Amblyopia participant could only complete the CAT and NAT due to fusion loss. The Anisometropic Amblyopia group exhibited the most aniseikonia (range -1.50-+10.50%) followed by Anisometropic Controls (range -3.30-+4.50%) and Isometropic Controls (range -1.50-+3.28%). There was a significant trend of more subjective aniseikonia with increasing amounts of anisometropia across all four tests (AI3 r = 0.630, p = 0.005; NAT r = 0.542, p = 0.017; RT r = 0.499, p = 0.035; CAT r = 0.440, p = 0.059. Bland Altman analysis demonstrated clinically significant levels of variability between the tests.
CONCLUSIONS
Subjective aniseikonia can be reliably measured in patients with anisometropia and suppression. Subjective aniseikonia measurement is recommended as four of the most commonly used clinical tests did not support the 1% per dioptre rule of thumb.
PubMed: 34278210
DOI: 10.22599/bioj.154 -
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology Feb 2022To assess the level of stereopsis in school children with spectacle-corrected refractive errors using Titmus fly and Randot stereo tests, evaluate the factors associated...
PURPOSE
To assess the level of stereopsis in school children with spectacle-corrected refractive errors using Titmus fly and Randot stereo tests, evaluate the factors associated with the level of stereopsis, and determine the level of agreement between the two tests.
METHODS
A cross-sectional study was done on 5- to 18-year-old school-children wearing spectacles for at least 1-month duration. Visual acuity was assessed using Snellen's visual acuity chart, and their spectacle correction being used currently was measured using an auto lensmeter. The level of stereopsis was assessed using Randot and Titmus fly stereo tests. Data were entered using Microsoft Excel and analyzed using IBM-SPSS version 20, Chicago, IL. The associations between stereopsis and type of refractive error, visual acuity, age, and gender were analyzed. An agreement between Randot and Titmus fly test was done using Kappa statistics.
RESULTS
A total of 222 children (101 boys and 121 girls; mean age 13 years) were assessed. Astigmatism was the most prevalent refractive error (60.4%), followed by myopia (24.8%) and hypermetropia (1.4%). Thirty children (13.5%) had anisometropia. All hyperopes had normal stereopsis. Children with spherical myopia had better stereopsis, followed by astigmatism and anisometropia in the same order (P = 0.036). Children with anisometropia ≤1.5 D had better stereopsis than anisometropia more than 1.5 D. Stereopsis was also found to have no correlation with the age and visual acuity at the time of testing or the age at which the child first started wearing spectacles. Stereopsis values obtained from Randot and Titmus fly stereo tests showed moderate agreement with Kappa value 0.581.
CONCLUSION
Anisometropia and astigmatism are the most critical factors determining the level of stereopsis in refractive errors.
Topics: Adolescent; Anisometropia; Child; Cross-Sectional Studies; Depth Perception; Eyeglasses; Humans; Refractive Errors
PubMed: 35086245
DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_997_21 -
Frontiers in Public Health 2022To investigate anisometropia's prevalence and associated factors in school-aged children.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate anisometropia's prevalence and associated factors in school-aged children.
METHODS
A cross-sectional school-based study was conducted in Shandong Province, China, including children aged 4 to 17 from 9 schools. Anisometropia was defined as the differences between the two eyes in spherical equivalent (SE) or cylinder degree of 1.00 diopter (D) or more [SE or cylindrical (CYL) difference ≥ 1.00 D] after cycloplegic autorefraction. The Generalized Linear Model (GLM) was used to analyze the effects of ocular parameters [the differences between eyes in axial length (AL), habitual visual acuity (HVA), and corneal astigmatism (CA)] and lifestyle parameters (time spent indoor near work and outdoor activities) on anisometropia.
RESULTS
Total 4,198 (93.4%) of the 4,494 children were included in the statistical analysis. The mean difference in inter-eye SE was 0.42 ± 0.61 D. The prevalence of anisometropia was 13.2% (95%CI: 12.1 to 14.2%) (SE anisometropia's prevalence:10.3%; CYL anisometropia's prevalence: 4.1%), increased with older age (OR = 1.10, = 0.002), the worse myopic eye (myopia vs. premyopia, OR = 1.87, = 0.002), the worse hyperopic eye (hyperopia vs. premyopia, OR = 1.77, = 0.013), larger difference in inter-eye AL (0.1-0.3 vs. ≤ 0.1, OR = 1.67, = 0.008; >0.3 vs. ≤ 0.1, OR = 28.61, < 0.001), HVA (>0.2 vs. ≤ 0.2, OR = 3.01, < 0.001), CA (OR = 6.24, < 0.001), the worse stereoacuity (>100 vs. ≤ 100, OR = 1.59, = 0.001), longer indoor near work time per day on weekends (4-8 vs. <4, OR = 1.41, = 0.038; ≥8 vs. <4, OR = 1.40, = 0.131), and shorter outdoor activity time per day on weekdays (≥1 vs. <1, OR = 0.75, = 0.046) in multivariable analysis. In the SE anisometropia group, the difference in inter-eye AL (>0.3 vs. ≤ 0.1, β: 0.556, 95%CI: 0.050 to 1.063), HVA (>0.2 vs. ≤ 0.2, β: 0.511, 95%CI: 0.312 to 0.710), and CA (β: 0.488, 95%CI: 0.289 to 0.688), stereoacuity (>100 vs. ≤ 100, β: 0.299, 95%CI: 0.110 to 0.488) had a positive impact on the difference in inter-eye SE.
CONCLUSIONS
Ocular parameters and lifestyle parameters are associated with the occurrence of anisometropia in children aged 4 to 17 years, including the difference in inter-eye AL, HVA, CA, stereoacuity, indoor near work time, and outdoor activity time. Preventing myopia and early treating anisometropic amblyopia may be effective ways to reduce the prevalence of anisometropia.
Topics: Humans; Child; Anisometropia; Prevalence; Cross-Sectional Studies; Amblyopia; Astigmatism; Myopia
PubMed: 36620276
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1072574 -
Cureus Sep 2022The aim of this article is to report two cases of Straatsma syndrome, a rare disease characterized by the traditional triad of unilateral myelinated retinal nerve...
The aim of this article is to report two cases of Straatsma syndrome, a rare disease characterized by the traditional triad of unilateral myelinated retinal nerve fibres, axial myopia, and amblyopia. The cases were a five-year-old and a three-year-old girl, both with unilateral myopia, visual acuity of 0.1 (decimal), and myelinated retinal nerve fibres in fundoscopy. Prescription of cycloplegic refraction findings and occlusion of the involved eye was attempted in both cases, but visual acuity did not improve. Poor-prognostic factors of Straatsma syndrome include a high degree of anisometropia and extensive myelination.
PubMed: 36340550
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.29779 -
BMJ Open Ophthalmology 2022Myopia is a global healthcare concern and effective analyses of dioptric power are important in evaluating potential treatments involving surgery, orthokeratology, drugs... (Review)
Review
Myopia is a global healthcare concern and effective analyses of dioptric power are important in evaluating potential treatments involving surgery, orthokeratology, drugs such as low-dose (0.05%) atropine and gene therapy. This paper considers issues of concern when analysing refractive state such as data normality, transformations, outliers and anisometropia. A brief review of methods for analysing and representing dioptric power is included but the emphasis is on the optimal approach to understanding refractive state (and its variation) in addressing pertinent clinical and research questions. Although there have been significant improvements in the analysis of refractive state, areas for critical consideration remain and the use of power matrices as opposed to power vectors is one such area. Another is effective identification of outliers in refractive data. The type of multivariate distribution present with samples of dioptric power is often not considered. Similarly, transformations of samples (of dioptric power) towards normality and the effects of such transformations are not thoroughly explored. These areas (outliers, normality and transformations) need further investigation for greater efficacy and proper inferences regarding refractive error. Although power vectors are better known, power matrices are accentuated herein due to potential advantages for statistical analyses of dioptric power such as greater simplicity, completeness, and improved facility for quantitative and graphical representation of refractive state.
Topics: Anisometropia; Humans; Myopia; Prescriptions; Refraction, Ocular; Refractive Errors
PubMed: 35452207
DOI: 10.1136/bmjophth-2021-000929 -
Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) 2019To compare the treatment efficacy of optical correction and occlusion therapy and/or penalization for different anisometropic refractive errors (hyperopic, myopic, and...
PURPOSE
To compare the treatment efficacy of optical correction and occlusion therapy and/or penalization for different anisometropic refractive errors (hyperopic, myopic, and mixed).
METHODS
Medical records of 51 patients with anisometropic amblyopia managed by both optical correction and occlusion therapy and/or penalization were evaluated retrospectively. Patients were categorized into hyperopic, myopic or mixed anisometropia groups. Cycloplegic refraction, spherical anisometropia, baseline visual acuity, baseline interocular difference, final visual acuity and final interocular difference were analyzed to assess association between type of anisometropia with both resolution of anisometropic amblyopia and the time required to achieve it.
RESULTS
Baseline visual acuity of the amblyopic was 0.94±0.47 in the hyperopic group; 1.12±0.56, in the myopic group; and 1.08 ±0.39 in the mixed group. Final visual acuity in the amblyopic eye was 0.34±0.30 in the hyperopic group, 0.78±0.59 in the myopic group, and 0.78±0.56 in the mixed group. The difference in final visual acuity in the amblyopic eye between the groups was significant (P=0.014). The amblyopia was improved in 50% of patients in the hyperopic group, 23.8% in the myopic group, and 14.3% in the mixed group (P=0.081). The type of anisometropia was significantly associated with the improvement of visual acuity in the amblyopic eyes (P=0.044). The mean time for amblyopia improvement was 16.50±10.52 months in the hyperopic groups, 15.60±12.44 months in the myopic group, and 21.00±21.21 months in the mixed group (P=0.947).
CONCLUSION
Lower amounts of hyperopic anisometropia are as amblyogenic as higher amounts of myopic or mixed anisometropia. Mean improvement in visual acuity of an amblyopic eye with both optical correction, occlusion therapy and/or penalization is higher in patients with hyperopic anisometropia in comparison with myopic or mixed anisometropia. No significant difference was found in the time required to achieve improvement between the study groups.
PubMed: 31824133
DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S224463 -
Oman Journal of Ophthalmology 2022The aim of this study is to determine the outcome of accommodative esotropia (ET) and influencing factors in young Omani children.
AIM
The aim of this study is to determine the outcome of accommodative esotropia (ET) and influencing factors in young Omani children.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
In this retrospective cohort, children diagnosed with accommodative ET who had followed up in a tertiary hospital from 2006 to 2011 were identified. Parameters studied included cycloplegic refraction and its change with time, ocular alignment, binocularity, visual acuity (VA), amblyopia, and requirement for surgery.
RESULTS
A total of 51 patients were identified. Twenty-four patients were diagnosed with fully accommodative ET (FAET) and 27 with partially accommodative ET (PAET). The mean (± standard deviation [SD]) age of onset and reporting were 2.6 (±1.58) and 3.2 (±1.84) years in the two groups, respectively. The mean (SD) cycloplegic refraction at presentation was 4.50 (±1.66) in the FAET group and 3.65 (±1.67) in the PAET group. Anisometropia was present in 28% of patients. The mean follow-up period was 4.9 years. The following were detected in the final visit. A reduction in amblyopia from 43% to 6% of patients, binocularity in 75% of patients, and a mean increase of 0.64 (±1.3) D in cycloplegic refraction from the first visit ( = 0.005). The mean angle of deviation at near and distance was 29.86 (±15.21) and 17.80 (±10.14) prism diopters, respectively, in FAET patients and 30.15 (±14.83) and 29.53 (±15.53), respectively, in PAET patients. Thirty-seven percent of the PAET patients underwent surgery within 5 years from diagnosis. All participants in this cohort continued to wear glasses in the last follow-up visit.
CONCLUSION
Most children with refractive accommodative ET have an excellent outcome in terms of VA and binocular vision. The PAET group was characterized by delayed reporting, the presence of anisometropia, and lower hypermetropia. Further study is required to determine the possibility of weaning glasses in FAET patients.
PubMed: 36760956
DOI: 10.4103/ojo.ojo_80_22 -
Frontiers in Medicine 2022To investigate the development of refraction in anisometropic amblyopia who had been with patching therapy.
PURPOSE
To investigate the development of refraction in anisometropic amblyopia who had been with patching therapy.
METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed 37,528 medical records of the amblyopes who had been treated with patching therapy between July 2003 and January 2020 at the School of Optometry and Ophthalmology and Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. We included unilateral anisometropic amblyopia with a follow-up length of not < 2 years. In total, 371 cases were enrolled and followed up for a mean of 4.76 ± 2.11 years. The subjects were then divided into different groups and periods according to their initial spherical equivalent (SE) refractive error and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of the amblyopic eye. Linear mixed-effects models were fitted to calculate the annual change of SE.
RESULTS
The annual changes in SE were -0.32 (-0.35 to -0.30) and -0.16 (-0.19 to -0.14) D/yr for the amblyopic eye and the fellow eye, respectively. The annual changes in SE of amblyopic eyes during the treatment period and the successfully treated period were -0.36 (-0.43 to -0.29; 95% CI) and -0.27 (-0.32 to -0.23; 95% CI) D/yr, respectively; the annual SE changes of the fellow eye during the treatment period and the successfully-treated period were -0.07 (-0.14 to -0.01; 95% CI) and -0.18 (-0.22 to -0.14; 95% CI) D/yr, respectively.
CONCLUSION
The amblyopic eye experienced a significantly greater degree of refractive error changes than the fellow eye and underwent a continuous refractive error reduction before and after 7 years old. After the patching therapy was terminated, emmetropization in the amblyopic eye remained synchronized, whereas the refractive error change was increased in the fellow eye.
PubMed: 36330057
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.959085