-
Tumor-Derived Lysophosphatidic Acid Blunts Protective Type I Interferon Responses in Ovarian Cancer.Cancer Discovery Aug 2022Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) is a bioactive lipid enriched in the tumor microenvironment of immunosuppressive malignancies such as ovarian cancer. Although LPA enhances...
UNLABELLED
Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) is a bioactive lipid enriched in the tumor microenvironment of immunosuppressive malignancies such as ovarian cancer. Although LPA enhances the tumorigenic attributes of cancer cells, the immunomodulatory activity of this phospholipid messenger remains largely unexplored. Here, we report that LPA operates as a negative regulator of type I interferon (IFN) responses in ovarian cancer. Ablation of the LPA-generating enzyme autotaxin (ATX) in ovarian cancer cells reprogrammed the tumor immune microenvironment, extended host survival, and improved the effects of therapies that elicit protective responses driven by type I IFN. Mechanistically, LPA sensing by dendritic cells triggered PGE2 biosynthesis that suppressed type I IFN signaling via autocrine EP4 engagement. Moreover, we identified an LPA-controlled, immune-derived gene signature associated with poor responses to combined PARP inhibition and PD-1 blockade in patients with ovarian cancer. Controlling LPA production or sensing in tumors may therefore be useful to improve cancer immunotherapies that rely on robust induction of type I IFN.
SIGNIFICANCE
This study uncovers that ATX-LPA is a central immunosuppressive pathway in the ovarian tumor microenvironment. Ablating this axis sensitizes ovarian cancer hosts to various immunotherapies by unleashing protective type I IFN responses. Understanding the immunoregulatory programs induced by LPA could lead to new biomarkers predicting resistance to immunotherapy in patients with cancer. See related commentary by Conejo-Garcia and Curiel, p. 1841. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1825.
Topics: Female; Humans; Interferon Type I; Lysophospholipids; Ovarian Neoplasms; Receptors, Lysophosphatidic Acid; Tumor Microenvironment
PubMed: 35552618
DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-21-1181 -
Journal of Experimental & Clinical... Jul 2023After diagnosis, glioblastoma (GBM) patients undertake tremendous psychological problems such as anxiety and depression, which may contribute to GBM progression....
BACKGROUND
After diagnosis, glioblastoma (GBM) patients undertake tremendous psychological problems such as anxiety and depression, which may contribute to GBM progression. However, systematic study about the relationship between depression and GBM progression is still lacking.
METHODS
Chronic unpredictable mild stress and chronic restrain stress were used to mimic human depression in mice. Human GBM cells and intracranial GBM model were used to assess the effects of chronic stress on GBM growth. Targeted neurotransmitter sequencing, RNA-seq, immunoblotting and immunohistochemistry were used to detect the related molecular mechanism.
RESULTS
Chronic stress promoted GBM progression and up-regulated the level of dopamine (DA) and its receptor type 2 (DRD2) in tumor tissues. Down-regulation or inhibition of DRD2 abolished the promoting effect of chronic stress on GBM progression. Mechanistically, the elevated DA and DRD2 activated ERK1/2 and consequently inhibited GSK3β activity, leading to β-catenin activation. Meanwhile, the activated ERK1/2 up-regulated tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) level in GBM cells and then promoted DA secretion, forming an autocrine positive feedback loop. Remarkably, patients with high-depression exhibited high DRD2 and β-catenin levels, which showed poor prognosis. Additionally, DRD2 specific inhibitor pimozide combined with temozolomide synergistically inhibited GBM growth.
CONCLUSIONS
Our study revealed that chronic stress accelerates GBM progression via DRD2/ERK/β-catenin axis and Dopamine/ERK/TH positive feedback loop. DRD2 together with β-catenin may serve as a potential predictive biomarker for worse prognosis as well as therapeutic target of GBM patients with depression.
Topics: Humans; Animals; Mice; Glioblastoma; Dopamine; Tyrosine 3-Monooxygenase; beta Catenin; Feedback; Cell Line, Tumor; Brain Neoplasms; Cell Proliferation; Receptors, Dopamine D2
PubMed: 37415171
DOI: 10.1186/s13046-023-02728-8 -
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) Dec 2022Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in the world. Hypertension is a serious medical problem not only in adults but also in children and... (Review)
Review
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in the world. Hypertension is a serious medical problem not only in adults but also in children and adolescents. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is one of the most important mechanisms regulating blood pressure and the balance of water and electrolytes. According to the latest reports, RAAS acts not only on endocrine but also on paracrine, autocrine, and intracrine. Moreover, RAAS has a component associated with hypotension and cardioprotective effects. These components are called alternative pathways of RAAS. The most important peptide of the alternative pathway is Ang 1-7, which is related to the Mas receptor. Mas receptors have widely known antihypertension properties, including vasodilatation, the release of nitric oxide, and increased production of anti-inflammatory cytokines. Another interesting peptide is angiotensin A, which combines the properties of the classical and alternative pathways. No less important components of RAAS are the proteolytic enzymes angiotensin convertase enzyme type 1 and 2. They are responsible for the functioning of the RAAS system and are a hypertension therapeutic target. Also involved are tissue-specific enzymes that form a local renin-angiotensin system. Currently, a combination of drugs is used in hypertension treatment. These drugs have many undesirable side effects that cannot always be avoided. For this reason, new treatments are being sought, and the greatest hope comes from the ACE2/ang 1-7/MasR axis.
PubMed: 36611307
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13010016 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2020Immune cells rely on cell-cell communication to specify and fine-tune their responses. They express an extensive network of cell communication modes, including a vast... (Review)
Review
Immune cells rely on cell-cell communication to specify and fine-tune their responses. They express an extensive network of cell communication modes, including a vast repertoire of cell surface and transmembrane receptors and ligands, membrane vesicles, junctions, ligand and voltage-gated ion channels, and transporters. During a crosstalk between the nervous system and the immune system these modes of cellular communication and the downstream signal transduction events are influenced by neurotransmitters present in the local tissue environments in an autocrine or paracrine fashion. Neurotransmitters thus influence innate and adaptive immune responses. In addition, immune cells send signals to the brain through cytokines, and are present in the brain to influence neural responses. Altered communication between the nervous and immune systems is emerging as a common feature in neurodegenerative and immunopathological diseases. Here, we present the mechanistic frameworks of immunostimulatory and immunosuppressive effects critical neurotransmitters - dopamine (3,4-dihydroxyphenethylamine), serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine), substance P (trifluoroacetate salt powder), and L-glutamate - exert on lymphocytes and non-lymphoid immune cells. Furthermore, we discuss the possible roles neurotransmitter-driven neuroimmune networks play in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative disorders, autoimmune diseases, cancer, and outline potential clinical implications of balancing neuroimmune crosstalk by therapeutic modulation.
Topics: Animals; Humans; Neuroimmunomodulation; Neurotransmitter Agents
PubMed: 32973771
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01869 -
Nature Cancer Feb 2023BRAF mutation confers a poor prognosis in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) despite combinatorial targeted therapies based on the latest understanding of signaling...
BRAF mutation confers a poor prognosis in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) despite combinatorial targeted therapies based on the latest understanding of signaling circuitry. To identify parallel resistance mechanisms induced by BRAF-MEK-EGFR co-targeting, we used a high-throughput kinase activity mapping platform. Here we show that SRC kinases are systematically activated in BRAF CRC following targeted inhibition of BRAF ± EGFR and that coordinated targeting of SRC with BRAF ± EGFR increases treatment efficacy in vitro and in vivo. SRC drives resistance to BRAF ± EGFR targeted therapy independently of ERK signaling by inducing transcriptional reprogramming through β-catenin (CTNNB1). The EGFR-independent compensatory activation of SRC kinases is mediated by an autocrine prostaglandin E loop that can be blocked with cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2) inhibitors. Co-targeting of COX2 with BRAF + EGFR promotes durable suppression of tumor growth in patient-derived tumor xenograft models. COX2 inhibition represents a drug-repurposing strategy to overcome therapeutic resistance in BRAF CRC.
Topics: Humans; Cyclooxygenase 2; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; MAP Kinase Signaling System; Colorectal Neoplasms; ErbB Receptors; src-Family Kinases
PubMed: 36759733
DOI: 10.1038/s43018-022-00508-5 -
Oncoimmunology 2020Mutations of the gene coding for calreticulin (CALR) that cause the loss of the C-terminal KDEL motif abolish its retention in the endoplasmic reticulum and cause CALR...
Mutations of the gene coding for calreticulin (CALR) that cause the loss of the C-terminal KDEL motif abolish its retention in the endoplasmic reticulum and cause CALR to be secreted from cells. Specific CALR mutants bearing a novel C-terminus can precipitate the manifestation of myeloproliferative diseases via the autocrine activation of the thrombopoietin receptor. We recently employed the retention using selective hooks (RUSH) technology to monitor CALR trafficking and demonstrated the secretion of C-terminally truncated variants of CALR and . Of note, extracellular CALR inhibited the phagocytosis of dying cancer cells by dendritic cells (DC). Via this mechanism, mutant CALR induced immunosuppression, which decreased the efficacy of immunogenic anticancer chemotherapies and PD-1 blockade.
Topics: Calreticulin; Humans; Monitoring, Immunologic; Mutation; Myeloproliferative Disorders; Phagocytosis
PubMed: 32002304
DOI: 10.1080/2162402X.2019.1708126 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2019G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) constitute the largest superfamily of integral membrane protein receptors. As signal detectors, the several 100 known GPCRs are... (Review)
Review
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) constitute the largest superfamily of integral membrane protein receptors. As signal detectors, the several 100 known GPCRs are responsible for sensing the plethora of endogenous ligands that are critical for the functioning of our endocrine system. Although GPCRs are typically considered as detectors for first messengers in classical signal transduction pathways, they seldom operate in isolation in complex biological systems. Intercellular communication between identical or different cell types is often mediated by autocrine or paracrine signals that are generated upon activation of specific GPCRs. In the context of energy homeostasis, the distinct complement of GPCRs in each cell type bridges the autocrine and paracrine communication within an organ, and the various downstream signaling mechanisms regulated by GPCRs can be integrated in a cell to produce an ultimate output. GPCRs thus act as gatekeepers that coordinate and fine-tune a response. By examining the role of GPCRs in activating and receiving autocrine and paracrine signals, one may have a better understanding of endocrine diseases that are associated with GPCR mutations, thereby providing new insights for treatment regimes.
PubMed: 31354618
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00428 -
Cells Aug 2022The engagement of cadherins, cell-to-cell adhesion proteins, triggers a dramatic increase in the levels and activity of the Rac/Cdc42 GTPases, through the inhibition of... (Review)
Review
The engagement of cadherins, cell-to-cell adhesion proteins, triggers a dramatic increase in the levels and activity of the Rac/Cdc42 GTPases, through the inhibition of proteasomal degradation. This leads to an increase in transcription and secretion of IL6 family cytokines, activation of their common receptor, gp130, in an autocrine manner and phosphorylation of the signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 (Stat3) on tyrosine-705 by the Jak kinases. Stat3 subsequently dimerizes, migrates to the nucleus and activates the transcription of genes involved in cell division and survival. The Src oncogene also increases Rac levels, leading to secretion of IL6 family cytokines and gp130 activation, which triggers a Stat3-ptyr705 increase. Interestingly, at the same time, Src downregulates cadherins in a quantitative manner, while cadherins are required to preserve gp130 levels for IL6 family signalling. Therefore, a fine balance between Src/Rac/IL6 and Src/cadherin/gp130 levels is in existence, which is required for Stat3 activation. This further demonstrates the important role of cadherins in the activation of Stat3, through preservation of gp130 function. Conversely, the absence of cadherin engagement correlates with low Stat3 activity: In sparsely growing cells, both gp130 and Stat3-ptyr705 levels are very low, despite the fact that cSrc is active in the FAK (focal adhesion kinase)/cSrc complex, which further indicates that the of cadherins is important for Stat3 activation, not just their presence. Furthermore, the caveolin-1 protein downregulates Stat3 through binding and sequestration of cadherins to the scaffolding domain of caveolin-1. We hypothesize that the cadherins/Rac/gp130 axis may be a conserved pathway to Stat3 activation in a number of systems. This fact could have significant implications in Stat3 biology, as well as in drug testing and development.
Topics: Cadherins; Caveolin 1; Cytokine Receptor gp130; Cytokines; Interleukin-6; Janus Kinases
PubMed: 36010614
DOI: 10.3390/cells11162537 -
Neuroimmunomodulation 2024The brain and the immune systems represent the two primary adaptive systems within the body. Both are involved in a dynamic process of communication, vital for the... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The brain and the immune systems represent the two primary adaptive systems within the body. Both are involved in a dynamic process of communication, vital for the preservation of mammalian homeostasis. This interplay involves two major pathways: the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and the sympathetic nervous system.
SUMMARY
The establishment of infection can affect immunoneuroendocrine interactions, with functional consequences for immune organs, particularly the thymus. Interestingly, the physiology of this primary organ is not only under the control of the central nervous system (CNS) but also exhibits autocrine/paracrine regulatory circuitries mediated by hormones and neuropeptides that can be altered in situations of infectious stress or chronic inflammation. In particular, Chagas disease, caused by the protozoan parasite Trypanosoma cruzi (T. cruzi), impacts upon immunoneuroendocrine circuits disrupting thymus physiology. Here, we discuss the most relevant findings reported in relation to brain-thymic connections during T. cruzi infection, as well as their possible implications for the immunopathology of human Chagas disease.
KEY MESSAGES
During T. cruzi infection, the CNS influences thymus physiology through an intricate network involving hormones, neuropeptides, and pro-inflammatory cytokines. Despite some uncertainties in the mechanisms and the fact that the link between these abnormalities and chronic Chagasic cardiomyopathy is still unknown, it is evident that the precise control exerted by the brain over the thymus is markedly disrupted throughout the course of T. cruzi infection.
Topics: Humans; Chagas Disease; Animals; Brain; Thymus Gland; Trypanosoma cruzi; Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System; Neuroimmunomodulation; Pituitary-Adrenal System
PubMed: 38527434
DOI: 10.1159/000538220