-
Cancer Research Nov 2023Bevacizumab is an anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody that plays an important role in the combination treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. However, resistance remains a...
UNLABELLED
Bevacizumab is an anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody that plays an important role in the combination treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. However, resistance remains a major hurdle limiting bevacizumab efficacy, highlighting the importance of identifying a mechanism of antiangiogenic therapy resistance. Here, we investigated biophysical properties of the extracellular matrix (ECM) related to metabolic processes and acquired resistance to bevacizumab. Evaluation of paired pre- and posttreatment samples of liver metastases from 20 colorectal cancer patients treated with combination bevacizumab therapy, including 10 responders and 10 nonresponders, indicated that ECM deposition in liver metastases and a highly activated fatty acid oxidation (FAO) pathway were elevated in nonresponders after antiangiogenic therapy compared with responders. In mouse models of liver metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), anti-VEGF increased ECM deposition and FAO in colorectal cancer cells, and treatment with the FAO inhibitor etomoxir enhanced the efficacy of antiangiogenic therapy. Hepatic stellate cells (HSC) were essential for matrix stiffness-mediated FAO in colon cancer cells. Matrix stiffness activated lipolysis in HSCs via the focal adhesion kinase (FAK)/yes-associated protein (YAP) pathway, and free fatty acids secreted by HSCs were absorbed as metabolic substrates and activated FAO in colon cancer cells. Suppressing HSC lipolysis using FAK and YAP inhibition enhanced the efficacy of anti-VEGF therapy. Together, these results indicate that bevacizumab-induced ECM remodeling triggers lipid metabolic cross-talk between colon cancer cells and HSCs. This metabolic mechanism of bevacizumab resistance mediated by the physical tumor microenvironment represents a potential therapeutic target for reversing drug resistance.
SIGNIFICANCE
Extracellular matrix stiffening drives bevacizumab resistance by stimulating hepatic stellate cells to provide fuel for mCRC cells in the liver, indicating a potential metabolism-based therapeutic strategy for overcoming resistance.
Topics: Animals; Mice; Humans; Bevacizumab; Liver Neoplasms; Colorectal Neoplasms; Colonic Neoplasms; Stromal Cells; Lipids; Tumor Microenvironment
PubMed: 37610655
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-23-0025 -
International Journal of Cancer Feb 2023Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with the anti-angiogenesis drug bevacizumab is one of the future directions of immunotherapy. However, the potential adverse...
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with the anti-angiogenesis drug bevacizumab is one of the future directions of immunotherapy. However, the potential adverse drug reactions (ADRs) caused by combination therapy remain unclear. Current research on ADRs of combination therapy in cancer patients is extremely limited. Our study aims to help determine the safety of combination therapy. We downloaded the ADR reports on combination therapy, from the first quarter of 2012 to the fourth quarter of 2021, from the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database and conducted a large-scale retrospective study. The ADR signals were monitored by reporting odds ratio (ROR) and analyzing the risk of different ADRs in patients with Pan-cancer. A total of 2094 cases were selected, after excluding duplicate data and the use of chemotherapy drugs. We evaluated the risk of ADR in Pan-cancer patients. Combination therapy was an independent risk factor for adverse drug reactions associated with interstitial lung disease (OR: 8.62; 95% CI: 6.14-12.10, P < .0001), hypertension (OR: 1.35; 95% CI: 1.11-1.65, P < .01) and gastrointestinal bleeding (OR: 3.16; 95% CI: 2.21-4.51, P < .0001). A subgroup analysis revealed that the risk of endocrine system-related ADRs was elevated in patients receiving different combination therapies or with certain tumor types. We retrospectively studied the ADR of combination therapy in Pan-cancer patients and analyzed the distribution characteristics of ADR from the perspectives of treatment strategy and cancer types to provide recommendations for the individualized management of patients receiving combination therapy.
Topics: Humans; Pharmacovigilance; Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; Bevacizumab; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Retrospective Studies; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Neoplasms
PubMed: 36274626
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34332 -
Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.) Dec 2022Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapies have proven effective in treating retinal diseases but come with a high financial burden to the patient and health care... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE
Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapies have proven effective in treating retinal diseases but come with a high financial burden to the patient and health care system. Biosimilar drugs present an opportunity to decrease the cost of these important ophthalmic medications, and several ophthalmic biosimilars are expected to be approved and enter the market in the coming years. The objectives of this review are to educate ophthalmologists on the safety and efficacy of biosimilars in ophthalmology in the United States and European Union, review the biosimilar manufacturing and approval process, and describe the upcoming ophthalmic biosimilars.
RESULTS
Two ranibizumab biosimilars are currently approved in the United States and European Union. Additional ranibizumab biosimilars, as well as biosimilars for aflibercept and bevacizumab, are currently in clinical development.
CONCLUSION
Biosimilar use in ophthalmology is expected to grow with the patent expiration of two major anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs, ranibizumab and aflibercept, and the development of an ophthalmology-specific bevacizumab biosimilar. Financial savings from biosimilar use in ophthalmology have the potential to reduce economic burden, increase treatment adherence, and ultimately improve health outcomes.
Topics: United States; Humans; Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals; Endothelial Growth Factors; Ophthalmology; Bevacizumab; Ranibizumab
PubMed: 36394884
DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003626 -
World Journal of Gastroenterology Mar 2023Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is most commonly found in the context of liver cirrhosis and, in rare cases, in a healthy liver. Its prevalence has risen in recent years,... (Review)
Review
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is most commonly found in the context of liver cirrhosis and, in rare cases, in a healthy liver. Its prevalence has risen in recent years, particularly in Western nations, due to the increasing frequency of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Advanced HCC has a poor prognosis. For many years, the only proven therapy for unresectable HCC (uHCC) was sorafenib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Recently, the synergistic effect of an immune checkpoint inhibitor, atezolizumab, and bevacizumab outperformed sorafenib alone in terms of survival, making it the recommended first-line therapy. Other multikinase inhibitors, lenvatinib and regorafenib, were also recommended as first and second-line drugs, respectively. Intermediate-stage HCC patients with retained liver function, particularly uHCC without extrahepatic metastasis, may benefit from trans-arterial chemoembolization. The current problem in uHCC is selecting a patient for the best treatment while considering the preexisting liver condition and liver function. Indeed, all study patients had a Child-Pugh class A, and the best therapy for other individuals is unknown. Additionally, in the absence of a medical contraindication, atezolizumab could be combined with bevacizumab for uHCC systemic therapy. Several studies are now underway to evaluate immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with anti-angiogenic drugs, and the first findings are encouraging. The paradigm of uHCC therapy is changing dramatically, and many obstacles remain for optimum patient management in the near future. The purpose of this commentary review was to give an insight into current systemic treatment options for patients with uHCC who are not candidates for surgery to cure the disease.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Sorafenib; Bevacizumab; Liver Neoplasms; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
PubMed: 36970588
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i10.1551 -
Lung Cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) May 2021Multiple immunotherapy and chemotherapy combinations are approved for the management of advanced NSCLC which have not been directly compared in randomized clinical... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
OBJECTIVES
Multiple immunotherapy and chemotherapy combinations are approved for the management of advanced NSCLC which have not been directly compared in randomized clinical trials. This study indirectly compared the effectiveness of pembrolizumab + chemotherapy versus atezolizumab + chemotherapy+/-bevacizumab for previously untreated non-squamous NSCLC patients without EGFR/ALK aberrations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) was conducted using individual patient data (IPD) from KEYNOTE-021 Cohort G (KN021 G) (pembrolizumab + carboplatin + pemetrexed; N = 59) and KEYNOTE-189 (KN189) (pembrolizumab + pemetrexed + platinum chemotherapy; N = 410) and published aggregate data from IMpower 130 (atezolizumab + carboplatin + nab-paclitaxel; N = 451) and IMpower 150 (atezolizumab + carboplatin + paclitaxel + bevacizumab; N = 356). To adjust for cross-trial differences in baseline characteristics, data from patients randomized to pembrolizumab + chemotherapy in KN021 G/KN189 were reweighted to match the baseline characteristics of patients randomized to atezolizumab + chemotherapy from IMpower 130 or atezolizumab + chemotherapy + bevacizumab from IMpower 150. Outcomes included overall survival (OS), blinded independent review-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). OS and PFS follow-up were truncated to the trial with shorter follow-up. Sensitivity analyses were conducted without truncation of follow-up of OS and PFS.
RESULTS
After matching for cross-trial differences, the effective sample size of pembrolizumab + chemotherapy was 428 and 389 for the IMpower 130 and IMpower 150 comparisons, respectively. The estimated HRs (95 % CIs) of pembrolizumab + chemotherapy versus atezolizumab + chemotherapy were 0.80 (0.67,0.95) and 0.79 (0.67,0.93) with regard to OS and PFS, respectively. For pembrolizumab + chemotherapy versus atezolizumab + chemotherapy + bevacizumab, the estimated HR (95 % CIs) was 0.86 (0.72,1.03) for OS and 0.81 (0.68,0.96) for PFS. For ORR, the estimated risk ratio (95 % CI) and the risk difference (95 % CI) was 0.9 (0.8,1.1) and -3.5 % (-10.0,3.1) for pembrolizumab + chemotherapy versus atezolizumab + chemotherapy, respectively, and 0.8 (0.7,0.9) and -12.2 % (-19.6,-4.8) for pembrolizumab + chemotherapy versus atezolizumab + chemotherapy + bevacizumab, respectively. Findings were consistent across sensitivity analyses for both outcomes.
CONCLUSION
MAIC results showed a significantly better OS and PFS for pembrolizumab + chemotherapy compared with atezolizumab + chemotherapy and a significantly better PFS for pembrolizumab + chemotherapy compared with atezolizumab + chemotherapy + bevacizumab.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Carboplatin; Humans; Lung Neoplasms
PubMed: 33839603
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.03.020 -
United European Gastroenterology Journal Mar 2024The evolution in systemic therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) signifies a strategy of high-cost, high-gain innovation that originated with sorafenib, despite its... (Review)
Review
The evolution in systemic therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) signifies a strategy of high-cost, high-gain innovation that originated with sorafenib, despite its limited impact on tumor response. This strategic approach paved the way for the emergence of a second wave of the short-lived competitive advantage, exemplified by the incorporation of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and tremelimumab plus durvalumab. In the context of safety concerns within the liver cancer domain, the IMBRAVE150 and HIMALAYA trials boldly incorporated bevacizumab and tremelimumab, respectively, demonstrating the continuation of the high-risk, high-reward innovation paradigm. This review delves into the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats analysis of systemic therapies in the field of HCC.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Bevacizumab; Liver Neoplasms; Sorafenib
PubMed: 38267015
DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.12510 -
Current Opinion in Pharmacology Oct 2021The landscape of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has changed since the incorporation of sorafenib in 2007 as the first pharmacological treatment for HCC. The combination... (Review)
Review
The landscape of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has changed since the incorporation of sorafenib in 2007 as the first pharmacological treatment for HCC. The combination of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab is currently the first-line treatment for HCC patients, and there are several second-line options approved for patients who had received sorafenib as the first-line treatment. The advantage of having multiple options of pharmacological treatment for HCC patients is associated to the need to redefine the clinical decision-making approach and considering new endpoints for the clinical trials design. The aim of this review was to share the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer approach and to summarize the ongoing clinical trials, which are testing pharmacological treatments.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Sorafenib
PubMed: 34418875
DOI: 10.1016/j.coph.2021.07.009 -
Cancer Oct 2021
Topics: Bevacizumab; Colorectal Neoplasms; Humans
PubMed: 34374076
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33648 -
Journal of Translational Medicine Feb 2023Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is a major cause of visual impairment and blindness. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents, such as... (Review)
Review
Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is a major cause of visual impairment and blindness. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents, such as ranibizumab, bevacizumab, aflibercept, brolucizumab and faricimab have revolutionized the clinical management of nAMD. However, there remains an unmet clinical need for new and improved therapies for nAMD, since many patients do not respond optimally, may lose response over time or exhibit sub-optimal durability, impacting on real world effectiveness. Evidence is emerging that targeting VEGF-A alone, as most agents have done until recently, may be insufficient and agents that target multiple pathways (e.g., aflibercept, faricimab and others in development) may be more efficacious. This article reviews issues and limitations that have arisen from the use of existing anti-VEGF agents, and argues that the future may lie in multi-targeted therapies including alternative agents and modalities that target both the VEGF ligand/receptor system as well as other pathways.
Topics: Humans; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Macular Degeneration; Ranibizumab; Bevacizumab; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Intravitreal Injections
PubMed: 36810060
DOI: 10.1186/s12967-023-03937-7 -
International Journal of Molecular... Jul 2023A combination of atezolizumab with bevacizumab (AB) is the first regimen that has shown superiority compared to sorafenib and is now being used as the systemic treatment... (Review)
Review
A combination of atezolizumab with bevacizumab (AB) is the first regimen that has shown superiority compared to sorafenib and is now being used as the systemic treatment of choice for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with Barcelona Liver Cancer Clinic stage C. However, a considerable number of patients do not achieve survival or significant responses, indicating the need to identify predictive biomarkers for initial and on-treatment decisions in HCC patients receiving AB. In this manuscript, we summarized the current data from both experimental and clinical studies. This review will be beneficial for both clinicians and researchers in clinical practice as well as those designing experimental, translational, or clinical studies.
Topics: Humans; Bevacizumab; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Liver Neoplasms; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
PubMed: 37511558
DOI: 10.3390/ijms241411799