-
PLoS Pathogens Aug 2023Most humans have a lifelong imperceptible BK Polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection in epithelial cells lining the reno-urinary tract. In kidney transplant recipients,...
Most humans have a lifelong imperceptible BK Polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection in epithelial cells lining the reno-urinary tract. In kidney transplant recipients, unrestricted high-level replication of donor-derived BKPyV in the allograft underlies polyomavirus-associated nephropathy, a condition with massive epithelial cell loss and inflammation causing premature allograft failure. There is limited understanding on how BKPyV disseminates throughout the reno-urinary tract and sometimes causes kidney damage. Tubule epithelial cells are tightly connected and have unique apical and basolateral membrane domains with highly specialized functions but all in vitro BKPyV studies have been performed in non-polarized cells. We therefore generated a polarized cell model of primary renal proximal tubule epithelial cells (RPTECs) and characterized BKPyV entry and release. After 8 days on permeable inserts, RPTECs demonstrated apico-basal polarity. BKPyV entry was most efficient via the apical membrane, that in vivo faces the tubular lumen, and depended on sialic acids. Progeny release started between 48 and 58 hours post-infection (hpi), and was exclusively detected in the apical compartment. From 72 hpi, cell lysis and detachment gradually increased but cells were mainly shed by extrusion and the barrier function was therefore maintained. The decoy-like cells were BKPyV infected and could transmit BKPyV to uninfected cells. By 120 hpi, the epithelial barrier was disrupted by severe cytopathic effects, and BKPyV entered the basolateral compartment mimicking the interstitial space. Addition of BKPyV-specific neutralizing antibodies to this compartment inhibited new infections. Taken together, we propose that during in vivo low-level BKPyV replication, BKPyV disseminates inside the tubular system, thereby causing minimal damage and delaying immune detection. However, in kidney transplant recipients lacking a well-functioning immune system, replication in the allograft will progress and eventually cause denudation of the basement membrane, leading to an increased number of decoy cells, high-level BKPyV-DNAuria and DNAemia, the latter a marker of allograft damage.
Topics: Humans; Cytology; BK Virus; Polyomavirus; Kidney; Epithelial Cells; Polyomavirus Infections
PubMed: 37639485
DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1011622 -
Clinical Kidney Journal Apr 2022Classically described in renal allografts, BK virus nephropathy is increasingly recognized in native kidneys of other non-renal solid organ transplants. We discuss a...
Classically described in renal allografts, BK virus nephropathy is increasingly recognized in native kidneys of other non-renal solid organ transplants. We discuss a 68-year-old woman with a history of bilateral lung transplant referred for worsening renal function, confirmed to have BK virus nephropathy by biopsy with a serum BK virus polymerase chain reaction of over 59 million copies/mL. She was managed with a reduction in immunosuppression and intravenous cidofovir with no improvement in her clinical parameters. The seven prior reported cases of polyoma virus nephropathy in lung transplant recipients are reviewed, and the challenges of screening and management are discussed.
PubMed: 35371460
DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfab251 -
Journal of Virology Mar 2023Polyomavirus small T antigen (tAg) plays important roles in regulating viral replication, the innate immune response, apoptosis, and transformation for SV40, Merkel cell...
Polyomavirus small T antigen (tAg) plays important roles in regulating viral replication, the innate immune response, apoptosis, and transformation for SV40, Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV), murine polyomavirus (MuPyV), and JC polyomavirus (JCPyV). However, the function of BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) tAg has been much less studied. Here, we constructed mutant viruses that do not express tAg, and we showed that, in contrast with other polyomaviruses, BKPyV tAg inhibits large T antigen (TAg) gene expression and viral DNA replication. However, this occurs only in an archetype viral background. We also observed that the transduction of cells with a lentivirus-expressing BKPyV tAg kills the cells. We further discovered that BKPyV tAg interacts not only with PP2A A and C subunits, as has been demonstrated for other polyomavirus tAg proteins, but also with PP2A B''' subunit members. Knocking down either of two B''' subunits, namely STRN or STRN3, mimics the phenotype of the tAg mutant virus. However, a virus containing a point mutation in the PP2A binding domain of tAg only partially affected virus TAg expression and DNA replication. These results indicate that BKPyV tAg downregulates viral gene expression and DNA replication and that this occurs in part through interactions with PP2A. BK polyomavirus is a virus that establishes a lifelong infection of the majority of people. The infection usually does not cause any clinical symptoms, but, in transplant recipients whose immune systems have been suppressed, unchecked virus replication can cause severe disease. In this study, we show that a viral protein called small T antigen is one of the ways that the virus can persist without high levels of replication. Understanding which factors control viral replication enhances our knowledge of the virus life cycle and could lead to potential interventions for these patients.
Topics: Animals; Mice; Antigens, Viral, Tumor; BK Virus; DNA Replication; DNA, Viral; Polyomavirus Infections; Virus Replication
PubMed: 36916919
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.00077-23 -
Experimental and Clinical... May 2022BK polyomavirus infection is a critical complication affecting graft survival after kidney transplant. We aimed to determine the frequency, the effect on graft function,...
OBJECTIVES
BK polyomavirus infection is a critical complication affecting graft survival after kidney transplant. We aimed to determine the frequency, the effect on graft function, and the risk factors of BK polyomavirus infection in pediatric kidney transplant patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed data of 144 pediatric patients (female/male: 67/77; 0-18 years of age) who received kidney transplants in the past 10 years at our center. Demographic/ laboratory data, kidney failure etiologies, donor types, and immunosuppressive treatments were recorded. Patients were grouped as those with and without BKV infection, with groups compared in terms of transplant age, sex, kidney failure etiology, donor type, immunosuppressive treatments, presence of ureteral stents, acute rejection episodes, accompanying viral infections, glomerular filtration rate, and graft loss rate.
RESULTS
Twelve patients (8.3%) had BK polyomavirus infection. All 12 patients had viruria (8.3%), 8 (5.5%) had viremia, and 4 (2.8%) had BK polyomavirus nephropathy. Two patients (1.4%) had graft loss because of BK polyomavirus nephropathy. When patients with and without infection were compared, no significant differences were found in terms of sex, transplant age, donor type, presence of a ureteral stent, acute rejection, graft loss, or immunosuppressive treatment (P > .05). Rates of congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract were 30.3% and 66.6% in those without and with BK polyomavirus infection, respectively (P < .05). The group positive for BK polyomavirus had a significantly higher incidence of cytomegalovirus infection versus the group without infection (P < .05). Glomerular filtration rate values at years 1 and 3 were similar between groups (P > .05).
CONCLUSIONS
Frequency of BK polyomavirus nephropathy in pediatric patients undergoing kidney transplant in our center was consistent with data from other centers. Graft loss can be prevented by early detection and treatment through close periodic control and adequate evaluation of risk factors.
Topics: BK Virus; Child; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Kidney Diseases; Kidney Transplantation; Male; Polyomavirus Infections; Renal Insufficiency; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome; Tumor Virus Infections
PubMed: 35570612
DOI: 10.6002/ect.PediatricSymp2022.O34 -
Journal of the American Society of... Jan 2023Ischemia-reperfusion (IR) of a kidney transplant (KTx) upregulates TNF α production that amplifies allograft inflammation and may negatively affect transplant outcomes. (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Ischemia-reperfusion (IR) of a kidney transplant (KTx) upregulates TNF α production that amplifies allograft inflammation and may negatively affect transplant outcomes.
METHODS
We tested the effects of blocking TNF peri-KTx via a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 15-center, phase 2 clinical trial. A total of 225 primary transplant recipients of deceased-donor kidneys (KTx; 38.2% Black/African American, 44% White) were randomized to receive intravenous infliximab (IFX) 3 mg/kg or saline placebo (PLBO) initiated before kidney reperfusion. All patients received rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin induction and maintenance immunosuppression (IS) with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone. The primary end point was the difference between groups in mean 24-month eGFR.
RESULTS
There was no difference in the primary end point of 24-month eGFR between IFX (52.45 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 ; 95% CI, 48.38 to 56.52) versus PLBO (57.35 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 ; 95% CI, 53.18 to 61.52; P =0.1). There were no significant differences between groups in rates of delayed graft function, biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), development of de novo donor-specific antibodies, or graft loss/death. Immunosuppression did not differ, and day 7 post-KTx plasma analyses showed approximately ten-fold lower TNF ( P <0.001) in IFX versus PLBO. BK viremia requiring IS change occurred more frequently in IFX (28.9%) versus PLBO (13.4%; P =0.004), with a strong trend toward higher rates of BKV nephropathy in IFX (13.3%) versus PLBO (4.9%; P =0.06).
CONCLUSIONS
IFX induction therapy does not benefit recipients of kidney transplants from deceased donors on this IS regimen. Because the intervention unexpectedly increased rates of BK virus infections, our findings underscore the complexities of targeting peritransplant inflammation as a strategy to improve KTx outcomes.Clinical Trial registry name and registration number:clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02495077).
Topics: Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Kidney Transplantation; Infliximab; Graft Rejection; Inflammation; Virus Diseases; BK Virus
PubMed: 36195441
DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2022040454 -
Experimental and Clinical... Oct 2023Nephropathy due to BK virus infection is a major cause of graft dysfunction and loss. No specific treatment has been developed for the BK virus. Here, we compared the... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Comparative Study of Intravenous Immunoglobulin and Leflunomide Combination Therapy With Intravenous Immunoglobulin Single Therapy in Kidney Transplant Patients With BK Virus Infection: Single-Center Clinical Trial.
OBJECTIVES
Nephropathy due to BK virus infection is a major cause of graft dysfunction and loss. No specific treatment has been developed for the BK virus. Here, we compared the combination of intravenous immunoglobulin and leflunomide versus intravenous immunoglobulin to treat BK virus nephropathy after renal transplant.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This study was a randomized controlled clinical trial. Sixteen kidney transplant patients with BK virus infection were randomly divided into 2 groups; 1 group received intravenous immunoglobulin, and another group received leflunomide and intravenous immunoglobulin. P < .05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
Results of a polymerase chain reaction test for BK virus after 2 months of treatment were negative in 3 patients in the intravenous immunoglobulin group and in 7 patients in the intravenous immunoglobulin + leflunomide group. The amount of BK virus decreased significantly in each group, and a significant difference was observed between the 2 groups after 3 months (P = .014). The average level of creatinine in the intravenous immunoglobulin group at 1, 2, and 3 months after treatment was 1.7 ± 0.23, 1.8 ± 0.5, and 1.5 ± 0.3, respectively, and in the intravenous immunoglobulin + leflunomide group was 2.1 ± 0.75, 1.76 ± 0.37, and 1.4 ± 0.18, respectively (P > .05).
CONCLUSIONS
Although BK viral load decreased significantly in both groups, there was a significant difference between patients who received intravenous immunoglobulin versus those who received the combination of intravenous immunoglobulin + leflunomide after 3 months. The addition of leflunomide to the intravenous immunoglobulin treatment seems to have a better effect in reducing BK viral load. However, further studies with a larger sample and longer duration are needed.
Topics: Humans; Leflunomide; Kidney Transplantation; Immunoglobulins, Intravenous; Immunosuppressive Agents; Antiviral Agents; Nephritis, Interstitial; Polyomavirus Infections; BK Virus; Tumor Virus Infections
PubMed: 37965956
DOI: 10.6002/ect.2023.0071 -
Experimental and Clinical... Mar 2022Currentimmunosuppressive treatments for kidney transplant recipients have improved graft viability at the expense of impaired immune surveillance. The tools for... (Observational Study)
Observational Study
OBJECTIVES
Currentimmunosuppressive treatments for kidney transplant recipients have improved graft viability at the expense of impaired immune surveillance. The tools for monitoring immune status in pediatric kidney transplant recipients have not been widely investigated. Better knowledge could help recognize over immunosuppression and allow implementation of individualized preventive strategies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This retrospective and observational study included 28 pediatric kidney transplant recipients treated at a tertiary hospital. We measured peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations, immunoglobulins, immunosuppressivedrug levels, and viral loads. Reference analytical values for different age ranges were used to determine immune status. We recorded overall hospitalizations due to opportunistic infections and positive viral loads posttransplant.
RESULTS
We found hypogammaglobulinemia and lymphopenia in 19% and 41% of the patients, respectively. Peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations were below normal limits in one-third of the sample. These parameters were not related to the current number or plasma levels of immunosuppressive drugs. During follow-up, cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, and BK virus viremias were detected in 60.7% of the patients. Admissions due to opportunistic infections happened in 57.1%, mainly related to severe viral disease (30%) or gastrointestinal infections (26.7%). Most occurred in younger transplant recipients and during the first 2 years posttransplant (73.3%). We found no significant relation between peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations and hospital admissions for opportunistic infections or positive viral loads during follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS
Recurrent hospitalizations for opportunistic infections and analytical disorders in the immune system suggested that secondary immunosuppression in pediatric kidney transplant recipients was frequent. Immunosuppression was not directly related to plasma drug levels or the number of immunosuppressive drugs. Thus, immune monitoring might be helpful in combination with immunosuppressant levels to assess immunosuppression status and to establish individualized preventive measures.
Topics: Child; Epstein-Barr Virus Infections; Herpesvirus 4, Human; Humans; Immunosuppression Therapy; Kidney Transplantation; Retrospective Studies; Transplant Recipients; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35352632
DOI: 10.6002/ect.2021.0410 -
Clinical Journal of the American... Oct 2021Immune monitoring of kidney allograft recipients and personalized therapeutics may help reach the aspirational goal of "one transplant for life." The invasive kidney... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Review
Immune monitoring of kidney allograft recipients and personalized therapeutics may help reach the aspirational goal of "one transplant for life." The invasive kidney biopsy procedure, the diagnostic tool of choice, has become safer and the biopsy classification more refined. Nevertheless, biopsy-associated complications, interobserver variability in biopsy specimen scoring, and costs continue to be significant concerns. The dynamics of the immune repertoire make frequent assessments of allograft status necessary, but repeat biopsies of the kidney are neither practical nor safe. To address the existing challenges, we developed urinary cell mRNA profiling and investigated the diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive accuracy of absolute levels of a hypothesis-based panel of mRNAs encoding immunoregulatory proteins. Enabled by our refinements of the PCR assay and by investigating mechanistic hypotheses, our single-center studies identified urinary cell mRNAs associated with T cell-mediated rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy, and BK virus nephropathy. In the multicenter National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation-04, we discovered and validated a urinary cell three-gene signature of T-cell CD3 chain mRNA, interferon gamma inducible protein 10 (IP-10) mRNA, and 18s ribosomal RNA that is diagnostic of subclinical acute cellular rejection and acute cellular rejection and prognostic of acute cellular rejection and graft function. The trajectory of the signature score remained flat and below the diagnostic threshold for acute cellular rejection in the patients with no rejection biopsy specimens, whereas a sharp rise was observed during the weeks before the biopsy specimen that showed acute cellular rejection. Our RNA sequencing and bioinformatics identified kidney allograft biopsy specimen gene signatures of acute rejection to be enriched in urinary cells matched to acute rejection biopsy specimens. The urinary cellular landscape was more diverse and more enriched for immune cell types compared with kidney allograft biopsy specimens. Urinary cell mRNA profile-guided clinical trials are needed to evaluate their value compared with current standard of care.
Topics: Acute Disease; Animals; Biomarkers; Biopsy; CD3 Complex; Chemokine CXCL10; Gene Expression Profiling; Graft Rejection; Graft Survival; Humans; Kidney Transplantation; Predictive Value of Tests; RNA, Messenger; RNA, Ribosomal, 18S; Time Factors; Transcriptome; Treatment Outcome; Urinalysis
PubMed: 33906907
DOI: 10.2215/CJN.14010820 -
Transplantation and Cellular Therapy May 2023Infections with double-stranded DNA viruses are a common complication after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and cause significant morbidity and mortality...
Third-Party and Patient-Specific Donor-Derived Virus-Specific T Cells Demonstrate Similar Efficacy and Safety for Management of Viral Infections after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Children and Young Adults.
Infections with double-stranded DNA viruses are a common complication after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and cause significant morbidity and mortality in the post-transplantation period. Both donor-derived (DD) and third-party (TP) virus-specific T cells (VSTs) have shown efficacy and safety in viral management following HSCT in children and young adults. Owing to a greater degree of HLA matching between the recipient and stem cell donor, DD VSTs potentially persist longer in circulation compared to TP VSTs, because they are collected from a well-matched donor. However, TP VSTs are more easily accessible, particularly for smaller transplantation centers that do not have VST manufacturing capabilities, and more economical than creating a customized product for each transplant recipient. We conducted the present study to compare clinical efficacy and safety outcomes for DD VSTs and TP VSTs in a large cohort of pediatric and young adult HSCT recipients and to determine whether DD VSTs are associated with improved outcomes owing to potentially longer persistence in the recipient's circulation. This retrospective cohort study included 145 patients who received VSTs at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (CCHMC) between 2017 and 2021 for the treatment of adenovirus, BK virus, cytomegalovirus, and/or Epstein-Barr virus. Viruses were detected using quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Patients received VSTs on a DD (NCT02048332) or TP (NCT02532452) protocol, and VST products for both protocols were manufactured in an identical fashion. The primary study outcome was clinical response to VSTs, evaluated 4 weeks after VST administration, defined as decrease in viral load to under the inclusion thresholds, or resolution of symptoms of invasive viral infection, without the need for additional conventional antiviral medication following VST administration. Secondary outcomes included graft-versus-host-disease, transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy, renal function, hospital length of stay, and overall survival at 30 days and 100 days after VST administration and 1 year after HSCT. Statistical analysis was performed using the Fisher exact test or chi-square test. An unpaired t test was used to compare continuous variables. The study group comprised 77 patients in the DD cohort and 68 patients in the TP cohort. Eighteen patients in the TP cohort underwent HSCT at CCHMC, and the other 50 underwent HSCT at other institutions and presented to CCHMC solely for VST administration. There was no statistically significant difference in clinical response rates between DD and TP cohorts (65.6% versus 62.7%; odds ratio [OR], 1.162; 95% confidence interval [CI], .619 to 2.164; P = .747). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes between the 2 cohorts. The percentage of patients requiring multiple infusions for a clinical response did not differ significantly between the DD and TP cohorts (38.2% versus 32.5%; OR, .780; 95% CI, .345 to 1.805; P = .666). We found no significant difference in clinical response rate between DD VSTs and TP VSTs and a similar safety profile. Our data suggest that TP VSTs may be sufficient to control viral infection until immune reconstitution occurs despite the potential for more rapid VST clearance compared to DD VSTs. The lack of significant differences between DD VSTs and TP VSTs is an important finding, indicating that it is not necessary for every transplant center to manufacture customized DD VSTs, and that TP VSTs are a satisfactory substitute.
Topics: Child; Humans; Young Adult; Epstein-Barr Virus Infections; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Herpesvirus 4, Human; Retrospective Studies; T-Lymphocytes; Transplantation, Homologous; Virus Diseases
PubMed: 36736781
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.01.027 -
Viruses Oct 2020Members of the family differ in their host range, pathogenesis, and disease severity. To date, some of the most studied polyomaviruses include human JC, BK, and Merkel... (Review)
Review
Members of the family differ in their host range, pathogenesis, and disease severity. To date, some of the most studied polyomaviruses include human JC, BK, and Merkel cell polyomavirus and non-human subspecies murine and simian virus 40 (SV40) polyomavirus. Although dichotomies in host range and pathogenesis exist, overlapping features of the infectious cycle illuminate the similarities within this virus family. Of particular interest to human health, JC, BK, and Merkel cell polyomavirus have all been linked to critical, often fatal, illnesses, emphasizing the importance of understanding the underlying viral infections that result in the onset of these diseases. As there are significant overlaps in the capacity of polyomaviruses to cause disease in their respective hosts, recent advancements in characterizing the infectious life cycle of non-human murine and SV40 polyomaviruses are key to understanding diseases caused by their human counterparts. This review focuses on the molecular mechanisms by which different polyomaviruses hijack cellular processes to attach to host cells, internalize, traffic within the cytoplasm, and disassemble within the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), prior to delivery to the nucleus for viral replication. Unraveling the fundamental processes that facilitate polyomavirus infection provides deeper insight into the conserved mechanisms of the infectious process shared within this virus family, while also highlighting critical unique viral features.
Topics: Animals; Cell Nucleus; Host Microbial Interactions; Host Specificity; Humans; Polyomavirus; Polyomavirus Infections; Virus Internalization; Virus Replication
PubMed: 33076363
DOI: 10.3390/v12101168