-
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Aug 2022Implant subsidence is an undesirable effect after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). We investigated the relation between the rate of implant subsidence and... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Implant subsidence is an undesirable effect after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). We investigated the relation between the rate of implant subsidence and the ratio of the implant surface area to the surface area of the adjacent bone.
METHODS
We operated 170 disc spaces in a group of 104 patients. Two types of implants were used: 1) PEEK (polyetheretherketone) cages and 2) titanium-coated (TC) PEEK cages. Patients were randomised to receive a specific implant using a randomisation table. All implants had a surface area of 1.61 cm. Based on computed tomography images, bone surface areas were calculated for vertebral bodies immediately adjacent to the interbody implants. The implant-to-bone surface ratio was then calculated for each disc space. Implant subsidence was assessed over 12 months of follow-up, and associations between implant subsidence, the type of implant, and the implant-to-bone surface ratio were investigated.
RESULTS
Twelve months after the surgery, computed tomography was performed on 86 patients (144 disc spaces). Furthermore, in 166 disc spaces and 102 patients, conventional radiographs were obtained. Subsidence was observed in 21% of the examined intervertebral spaces, and it was more frequently associated with higher values of bone surface area and lower values of the implant-to-bone surface ratio. The type of implant (PEEK vs TC-PEEK cages) did not significantly influence the rate of implant subsidence.
CONCLUSIONS
Implant subsidence was significantly related to the value of a coefficient representing the ratio of the implant's surface area to the bone surface area of the adjacent vertebral bodies, with subsidence occurring significantly more rarely for coefficient values ≥ 0.37.
Topics: Cervical Vertebrae; Diskectomy; Humans; Ketones; Polyethylene Glycols; Prostheses and Implants; Spinal Fusion; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35927645
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05698-8 -
Scientific Reports Mar 2022Studies on outcomes after four-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) are limited in the literature. The purpose of this study was to report on clinical... (Review)
Review
Studies on outcomes after four-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) are limited in the literature. The purpose of this study was to report on clinical outcomes and revision rates following four-level ACDF. Patients operated with four-level ACDF were identified in a prospectively accrued single institution database. Outcome scores included the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for neck and arm pain. Reoperation rates were determined. Any complications were identified from a review of the medical records. Twenty-eight patients with a minimum of 12 months follow up were included in the analysis. The mean age at surgery was 58.5 years. The median radiographic follow up time was 23 (IQR = 16-31.25) months. Cervical lordosis was significantly improved postoperatively (- 1 to - 13, p < 0.001). At the median 24 (IQR = 17.75-39.50) months clinical follow up time, there was a significant improvement in the NDI (38 to 28, p = 0.046) and VAS for neck pain scores (5.1 to 3, p = 0.012). The most common perioperative complication was transient dysphagia (32%) followed by hoarseness (14%). Four (14%) patients required revision surgery at a median 11.5 (IQR = 2-51) months postoperatively. The results of this study indicate that patients who undergo four-level ACDF have a significant improvement in clinical outcomes at median 24 months follow up. Stand-alone four-level ACDF is a valid option for the management of complex cervical degenerative conditions.
Topics: Cervical Vertebrae; Diskectomy; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Spinal Fusion; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35351960
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-09389-1 -
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) Jul 2023: Degenerative disk disease is a widespread chronic condition that causes diskogenic pain. Diskogenic pain can be treated with various therapy methods. Disc-FX is a... (Review)
Review
: Degenerative disk disease is a widespread chronic condition that causes diskogenic pain. Diskogenic pain can be treated with various therapy methods. Disc-FX is a revolutionary, minimally invasive, percutaneous nucleo-annuloplasty method that combines manual diskectomy with nuclear and annular remodeling using radiofrequency ablation to relieve diskogenic pain. In this study, the technical features, clinical outcomes, and complications of Disc-FX are summarized. : A comprehensive literature review was performed. By exploring several databases, we collected studies on Disc-FX for treating diskogenic pain. The outcomes included perioperative data, clinical results, and complications. : In the 15 studies included, data from 570 patients were collected. L4-L5 was the most frequently operated level, and most cases underwent single-level procedures. The follow-up period for these patients ranged from 2 months to 24 months. One study reported a procedure time between 35 and 60 min, whereas the remaining studies reported a procedure time of less than 30 min. The mean visual analog scale score decreased from 7.22 preoperatively to 1.81 at the final follow-up. The mean numerical rating scale score decreased from 6.98 preoperatively to 3.9 at the final follow-up. The mean Japanese Orthopaedic Association score improved from 16.26 preoperatively to 25.88 in the final follow-up. The mean Oswestry Disability Index score decreased from 35.37 preoperatively to 14.66 at the final follow-up. The mean satisfaction rate (based on the Macnab criteria) was 87.6% (range, 78.4-95.2%). The total incidence of postoperative transient pain was 8.77% (50/570) after nucleo-annuloplasty using Disc-FX, and recurrence was 1.58% (9/570). : According to our comprehensive evaluation, using percutaneous nucleo-annuloplasty for treating lumbar diskogenic diseases provided considerable pain alleviation and improved functional outcomes with fewer complications. Disc-FX is a safe and effective procedure that is a good treatment option for patients with diskogenic pain.
Topics: Humans; Treatment Outcome; Diskectomy; Low Back Pain; Chronic Disease; Radiofrequency Ablation; Lumbar Vertebrae; Retrospective Studies; Endoscopy
PubMed: 37512102
DOI: 10.3390/medicina59071291 -
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Sep 2023In recent years, with improved living standards, adolescent obesity has been increasingly studied. The incidence of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) in obese adolescents is...
In recent years, with improved living standards, adolescent obesity has been increasingly studied. The incidence of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) in obese adolescents is increasing yearly. No clinical studies have reported the use of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) in obese adolescent lumbar disc herniation (ALDH) patients. This study evaluated the preliminary surgical outcomes of PELD in obese ALDH patients. Fifty-one ALDH patients underwent single-level PELD surgery between January 2014 and January 2020. Patients were divided into an obese group and a normal group. Patient characteristics and surgical variables were compared between the two groups. The VAS, ODI, and SF-36 scales were used preoperatively and postoperatively to evaluate the clinical efficacy. In this study, 19 patients were included in the obese group, and 28 were included in the normal group. There was no significant difference in age, sex, duration of low back pain, duration of leg pain, or operative level between the obese and normal groups preoperatively. The obese group had a longer operative time (OT) (101.9 ± 9.0 min vs. 84.3 ± 11.0 min, P < 0.001), more fluoroscopy exposures (41.0 ± 5.8 vs. 31.6 ± 7.0, P < 0.001) and a longer time to ambulation (29.9 ± 4.0 vs. 25.0 ± 2.9, p < 0.001) than the normal group. The groups did not significantly differ in complications. The VAS score for back and leg pain and the ODI and SF-36 score for functional status improved significantly postoperatively. The PELD procedure is a safe and feasible method for treating LDH in obese adolescents. Obese ALDH patients require a longer OT, more fluoroscopy exposures and a longer time to get out of bed than normal ALDH patients. However, PELD yields similar clinical outcomes in obese and normal ALDH patients.
Topics: Adolescent; Humans; Diskectomy, Percutaneous; Pediatric Obesity; Intervertebral Disc Displacement; Lumbar Vertebrae; Diskectomy; Low Back Pain
PubMed: 37674144
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06842-8 -
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and... Aug 2023To determine the safety and efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) combined with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) hydrogel injection in patients with...
OBJECTIVE
To determine the safety and efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) combined with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) hydrogel injection in patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH).
METHODS
A total of 98 consecutive patients with LDH who underwent either PELD combined with PRP hydrogel injection or PELD alone were reviewed. This retrospective study was performed between January 2019 and January 2021. Clinical outcomes were compared in the visual analog scale (VAS) for low back pain and leg pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, and Macnab criteria. Intervertebral disc height on MRI was measured, and the Pfirrmann grade classification was used pre-operatively and post-operatively.
RESULTS
No severe adverse events were reported during an 18-month follow-up period. VAS scores for back pain were decreased at 1 month, 3 months, and 18 months in the treatment group than that in the control group. JOA score and ODI in the treatment group at 3-month and 18-month follow-up was lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). The excellent and good rate of the Macnab criteria was 92.0% (46/50) in the treatment group and 89.6% (43/48) in the control group (P > 0.05). The comparison of Pfirrmann grading and disc height at 18-month follow-up showed significant difference in two groups (P < 0.05). The recurrence of LDH in the treatment group was lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
We suggest that PELD combined with PRP hydrogel injection to treat patients with LDH is a safe and promising method. PRP injection was beneficial for disc remodelling after PELD.
Topics: Humans; Diskectomy, Percutaneous; Intervertebral Disc Displacement; Hydrogels; Retrospective Studies; Lumbar Vertebrae; Diskectomy
PubMed: 37605261
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-04093-w -
Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging 2022In order to analyze the clinical efficacy and recovery of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) treated by lateral and posterior foraminoscopy and posterior approach...
In order to analyze the clinical efficacy and recovery of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) treated by lateral and posterior foraminoscopy and posterior approach foraminoscopy (PELD), the comparison of clinical efficacy and recovery effect between lateral and posterior foraminoscopy and PELD in LDH patients was conducted. A total of 96 LDH patients admitted to our hospital from July 2020 to July 2021 were selected, and the lateral and posterior foraminoscopy group and PELD group were, respectively, established according to different surgical intervention methods. The lateral posterior foraminoscopy group is treated with lateral posterior foraminoscopy intervention, and the PELD group is treated with posterior foraminoscopy intervention. The intraoperative and postoperative indicators of the two groups were observed, and the pain improvement, lumbar function, clinical efficacy, and incidence of adverse complications were compared between the two groups before and 3 months after surgery. The Spearman correlation coefficient is used to analyze the correlation between visual analogue scale (VAS) score, lumbar function (ODI) score, and the incidence of complications. For patients with LDH in implementing lientang road intervertebral foramen mirror, the clinical efficacy of the intervertebral foramen to a rear mirror was more apparent. It demonstrates that the treatment can reduce intraoperative blood loss, shorten hospitalization time, improve lumbar vertebral function, and reduce a patient's risk of complications.
Topics: Diskectomy, Percutaneous; Humans; Intervertebral Disc Displacement; Lumbar Vertebrae; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35833062
DOI: 10.1155/2022/8135322 -
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and... Dec 2022Since there are currently no systematic evidence-based medical data on the efficacy and safety of PECD, this meta-analysis pooled data from studies that reported the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Since there are currently no systematic evidence-based medical data on the efficacy and safety of PECD, this meta-analysis pooled data from studies that reported the efficacy or safety of PECD for cervical disc herniation to examine the efficacy, recurrence and safety of using PECD to treat cervical disc herniation.
METHODS
We searched the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases for studies published from inception to July 2022. Nine nonrandomized controlled trials (non-RCTs) that reported the efficacy or safety of percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy for cervical disc herniation were included. We excluded duplicate publications, studies without full text, studies with incomplete information, studies that did not enable us to conduct data extraction, animal experiments and reviews. STATA 15.1 software was used to analyse the data.
RESULTS
The proportions of excellent and good treatment results after PECD for CDH were 39% (95% CI: 31-48%) and 47% (95% CI: 34-59%), respectively. The pooled results showed that the VAS scores at 1 week post-operatively (SMD = -2.55, 95% CI: - 3.25 to - 1.85) and at the last follow-up (SMD = - 4.30, 95% CI: - 5.61 to - 3.00) after PECD for cervical disc herniation were significantly lower than the pre-operative scores. The recurrence rate of neck pain and the incidence of adverse events after PECD for cervical disc herniation were 3% (95% CI: 1-6%) and 5% (95% CI: 2-9%), respectively. Additionally, pooled results show that the operative time (SMD = - 3.22, 95% CI: - 5.21 to - 1.43) and hospital stay (SMD = - 1.75, 95% CI: - 2.67to - 0.84) were all significantly lower for PECD than for ACDF. The pooled results also showed that the proportion of excellent treatment results was significantly higher for PECD than for ACDF (OR = 2.29, 95% CI: 1.06-4.96).
CONCLUSION
PECD has a high success rate in the treatment of CHD and can relieve neck pain, and the recurrence rate and the incidence of adverse events are low. In addition, compared with ACDF, PECD has a higher rate of excellent outcomes and a lower operative time and hospital stay. PECD may be a better option for treating CHD.
Topics: Animals; Humans; Intervertebral Disc Displacement; Neck Pain; Diskectomy, Percutaneous; Diskectomy; Endoscopy
PubMed: 36456964
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-022-03365-1 -
Pain Physician Nov 2023Adjacent segment disease (ASD) is a common complication following posterior disc decompression and fusion surgery. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression surgery... (Clinical Trial)
Clinical Trial
Comparison of Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal and Interlaminar Approaches in Treating Adjacent Segment Disease Following Lumbar Decompression Surgery: A Clinical Retrospective Study.
BACKGROUND
Adjacent segment disease (ASD) is a common complication following posterior disc decompression and fusion surgery. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression surgery (PELD) has been used to treat ASD through either a transforaminal or interlaminar approach. However, to our limited knowledge there are no reports comparing the 2 approaches for treating ASD.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate clinical outcomes of PELD in treating ASD and comparing the surgical results and complications between the 2 approaches. This may be helpful for spinal surgeons when decision-making ASD treatment.
STUDY DESIGN
A clinical retrospective study.
SETTING
This study was conducted at the Department of Orthopedics of the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University.
METHODS
From January 2015 through December 2019, a total of 68 patients with ASD who underwent PELD after lumbar posterior decompression with fusion surgery were included in this study. The patients were divided into a percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal decompression (PETD) group and a percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar decompression (PEID) group according to the approach used. The demographic characteristics, radiographic and clinical outcomes, and complications were recorded in both groups through a chart review.
RESULTS
Of the 68 patients, 40 underwent PEID and 28 patients underwent PETD. Compared with their preoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, all patients had significant postoperative improvement at 3 months, 6 months, one year and at the latest follow-up. There were no significant statistical differences in the VAS and ODI scores between PETD and PEID groups with a P value > 0.05. There was a significant statistical difference in the average fluoroscopy times between the PETD and PEID groups with a P value = 0.000. Revision surgery occurred in 8 patients: 6 patients who underwent PETD and 2 patients who underwent PEID. The revision rate showed a significant statistical difference between the 2 approaches with a P value = 0.039.
LIMITATIONS
Firstly, the number of patients included in this study was small. More patients are needed in a further study. Secondly, the follow-up time was limited in this study. There is still no conclusion about whether the primary decompression with instruments will increase the reoperation rate after a PELD, and a longer follow-up is needed in the future. Thirdly, this study was a clinical retrospective study. Randomized or controlled trials are needed in the future in order to achieve a higher level of evidence. Fourthly, there were debates about PELD approach choices for ASDs, which may affect the comparison results between PETD and PEID. In our study, the approaches were mainly determined by the level and types of disc herniation, and the surgeons' preference. More patients with an ASD with different levels and types of disc herniation and surgical approaches are needed in the future to eliminate these biases.
CONCLUSION
Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression surgery is a feasible option for ASD following lumbar decompression surgery with instruments. Compared with PETD, PEID seems to be a better approach to treat symptomatic ASDs.
Topics: Humans; Decompression; Diskectomy; Diskectomy, Percutaneous; Endoscopy; Intervertebral Disc Displacement; Lumbar Vertebrae; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37976490
DOI: No ID Found -
Orthopaedic Surgery Oct 2022Conventional localization technique of V point for full-endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy and discectomy (FPCD) required repeated fluoroscopies, especially in...
OBJECTIVE
Conventional localization technique of V point for full-endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy and discectomy (FPCD) required repeated fluoroscopies, especially in patients with short and thick necks. To address this issue, the present study aimed to introduce a new localization technique of V point, and further evaluate its efficacy.
METHODS
A K-wire was inserted and fixed at the pedicle eye under A/P fluoroscopy, then a working channel was established quickly along with it. Thirty-four patients who underwent minimally invasive FPCD assisted by the new technique were included in this study. The clinical and radiological data were collected and analyzed, including radiation dose, operative time, positioning time, visual analog scale (VAS) for neck and arm pain, neck disability index (NDI) scores, Cobb angle of operative level and range of motion of the cervical spine.
RESULTS
All operations were performed successfully, and no iatrogenic nerve or vascular injury occurred. None of the patients needed to be transferred to open surgery or revision surgery. The mean radiation dose was found to be1.68 ± 0.36 mSv. The mean positioning time observed was 10.68 ± 5.42 min and the average operation time was 81.18 ± 10.87 min. The operation time significantly declined as the number of patients increased. A significant difference in operation time between the first (96.22 ± 10.36 min) and last quartile (75.00 ± 3.84 min) of cases was observed (t = 4.82, P < 0.001). The VAS scores for neck and arm pain, and NDI scores were significantly improved after surgery (P <0.0001, P <0.0001, P <0.0001). Based on MacNab criteria, the excellent plus good rate was 91.17%. The Cobb angle of operative level and range of motion of the cervical spine were significantly improved postoperatively (t = 2.846, P = 0.015; t = 2.232, P = 0.026).
CONCLUSION
The new image-assisted V point localization technique is simple and useful with little radiation exposure and short positioning time. FPCD assisted by the new technique could be a safe and effective alternative on properly selected patients.
Topics: Cervical Vertebrae; Diskectomy; Endoscopy; Foraminotomy; Humans; Intervertebral Disc Displacement; Radiculopathy; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36102205
DOI: 10.1111/os.13476 -
Turkish Neurosurgery 2022To determine the effects of physical therapy and exercise programs that was performed after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery on patient?s pain...
AIM
To determine the effects of physical therapy and exercise programs that was performed after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery on patient?s pain treatment, a retrospective study was designed.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Of the 127 patients without neurological deficit who underwent ACDF surgery in our clinic in 2019 and 2020 for single-level cervical disc herniation, 40 patients (including 23 men and 17 women) were enrolled. The mean age of the patients was 45.5 years. The patients were separated into two groups. Group A comprised 20 patients who did not apply for a post-ACDF physical therapy and exercise program. Group B comprised 20 patients who applied for a 6-month post-ACDF physical therapy and exercise program and complied with it. The Oswestry Deficiency Index (ODI), visual analog pain scale (VAS), and C2-7 cervical lordosis angle were evaluated. The C2-7 cervical lordosis angles were individually calibrated and calculated for each patient using Surgimap. The relationships between the results were compared using Wilcoxon biostatistics test.
RESULTS
The ODI, VAS, and C2-7 cervical lordosis angle parameters of Groups A and B were statistically compared. No significant differences in the ODI, VAS, and C2-7 cervical lordosis angle 2 days after surgery and C2-7 cervical lordosis angle 6 months after surgery were observed between the two groups; however, significant differences were observed in VAS and ODI values 6 months after physical therapy in Group B and in VAS and ODI values 6 months after surgery in Group A. No significant difference in C2-7 cervical lordosis angle 6 months after surgery was observed between post-physical therapy Group B and postoperative Group A.
CONCLUSION
Physical therapy and exercise program performed early after ACDF enhances and improves pain management and does not cause any changes in the restoration of cervical misalignment.
Topics: Cervical Vertebrae; Diskectomy; Female; Humans; Lordosis; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Spinal Fusion; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35253156
DOI: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.36243-21.2