-
Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Surgery &... Feb 2021Terrible triad of the elbow associates posterior dislocation, radial head fracture and coronoid process fracture. It is a complex trauma, associating severe bone and... (Review)
Review
Terrible triad of the elbow associates posterior dislocation, radial head fracture and coronoid process fracture. It is a complex trauma, associating severe bone and ligament lesions, with high more-or-less long-term risk of residual instability, stiffness, pain and osteoarthritis. During the last 20 years, pathologic, biomechanical and clinical knowledge has greatly progressed. Prevention of these severe complications requires initial understanding of the lesion mechanism and precise analysis of all lesions. Surgery aims to restore perfect stability by sequential anatomic repair, enabling early mobilization to prevent onset of stiffness. The aims of the present paper were to summarize the anatomic and pathophysiological bases, highlight the crucial importance of the humeroradial column and lateral collateral ligament, and to determine the importance of the coronoid process. Some aspects of treatment are controversial: systematic medial collateral ligament repair, or use of an articulated external fixator. Finally, we propose a simple algorithm to guide repair.
Topics: Elbow; Elbow Joint; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Humans; Joint Dislocations; Radius Fractures; Range of Motion, Articular; Treatment Outcome; Ulna Fractures
PubMed: 33333276
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2020.102784 -
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Dec 2022There exists a vast number of surgical treatment options for acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries, and the current literature has yet to determine an equivocally... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
There exists a vast number of surgical treatment options for acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries, and the current literature has yet to determine an equivocally superior treatment. AC joint repair has a long history and dates back to the beginning of the twentieth century.
MAIN BODY
Since then, over 150 different techniques have been described, covering open and closed techniques. Low grade injuries such as Type I-II according to the modified Rockwood classification should be treated conservatively, while high-grade injuries (types IV-VI) may be indicated for operative treatment. However, controversy exists if operative treatment is superior to nonoperative treatment, especially in grade III injuries, as functional impairment due to scapular dyskinesia or chronic pain remains concerning following non-operative treatment. Patients with a stable AC joint without overriding of the clavicle and without significant scapular dysfunction (Type IIIA) may benefit from non-interventional approaches, in contrast to patients with overriding of the clavicle and therapy-resistant scapular dysfunction (Type IIIB). If these patients are considered non-responders to a conservative approach, an anatomic AC joint reconstruction using a hybrid technique should be considered. In chronic AC joint injuries, surgery is indicated after failed nonoperative treatment of 3 to 6 months. Anatomic AC joint reconstruction techniques along with biologic augmentation (e.g. Hybrid techniques, suture fixation) should be considered for chronic high-grade instabilities, accounting for the lack of intrinsic healing and scar-forming potential of the ligamentous tissue in the chronic setting. However, complication and clinical failure rates remain high, which may be a result of technical failures or persistent horizontal and rotational instability.
CONCLUSION
Future research should focus on addressing horizontal and rotational instability, to restore native physiological and biomechanical properties of the AC joint.
Topics: Humans; Acromioclavicular Joint; Joint Instability; Arthroplasty; Clavicle; Sutures; Joint Dislocations
PubMed: 36494652
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05935-0 -
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology,... Jun 2022The extent of shoulder instability and the indication for surgery may be determined by the prevalence or size of associated lesions. However, a varying prevalence is... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
The extent of shoulder instability and the indication for surgery may be determined by the prevalence or size of associated lesions. However, a varying prevalence is reported and the actual values are therefore unclear. In addition, it is unclear whether these lesions are present after the first dislocation and whether or not these lesions increase in size after recurrence. The aim of this systematic review was (1) to determine the prevalence of lesions associated with traumatic anterior shoulder dislocations, (2) to determine if the prevalence is higher following recurrent dislocations compared to first-time dislocations and (3) to determine if the prevalence is higher following complete dislocations compared to subluxations.
METHODS
PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane and Web of Science were searched. Studies examining shoulders after traumatic anterior dislocations during arthroscopy or with MRI/MRA or CT published after 1999 were included. A total of 22 studies (1920 shoulders) were included.
RESULTS
The proportion of Hill-Sachs and Bankart lesions was higher in recurrent dislocations (85%; 66%) compared to first-time dislocations (71%; 59%) and this was statistically significant (P < 0.01; P = 0.05). No significant difference between recurrent and first-time dislocations was observed for SLAP lesions, rotator-cuff tears, bony Bankart lesions, HAGL lesions and ALPSA lesions. The proportion of Hill-Sachs lesions was significantly higher in complete dislocations (82%) compared to subluxations (54%; P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION
Higher proportions of Hill-Sachs and Bankart were observed in recurrent dislocations compared to first-time dislocations. No difference was observed for bony Bankart, HAGL, SLAP, rotator-cuff tear and ALPSA. Especially when a Hill-Sachs or Bankart is present after first-time dislocation, early surgical stabilization may need to be considered as other lesions may not be expected after recurrence and to limit lesion growth. However, results should be interpreted with caution due to substantial heterogeneity and large variance.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
IV.
Topics: Arthroscopy; Bankart Lesions; Humans; Joint Dislocations; Joint Instability; Prevalence; Recurrence; Retrospective Studies; Rotator Cuff Injuries; Shoulder Dislocation; Shoulder Joint
PubMed: 34988633
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-021-06847-7 -
BMJ Case Reports Jan 2021A pisiform dislocation is an uncommon injury which can lead to significant morbidity if missed. The literature regarding pisiform dislocation is limited and largely from...
A pisiform dislocation is an uncommon injury which can lead to significant morbidity if missed. The literature regarding pisiform dislocation is limited and largely from case reports. In this case, we present a 51-year-old right-hand dominant male who sustained the injury after a fall. He attended the emergency department on the same day and a closed reduction was able to be performed under a haematoma block. On review in follow-up clinic the patient's symptoms had completely resolved.
Topics: Accidental Falls; Casts, Surgical; Closed Fracture Reduction; Humans; Joint Dislocations; Male; Middle Aged; Pisiform Bone; Treatment Outcome; Wrist Injuries
PubMed: 33408102
DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2020-237482 -
The Journal of Hand Surgery, European... Sep 2023Carpal dislocations result from sequential disruption of the complex relationship between the bones and ligaments of the wrist. Injuries to the carpus occur via... (Review)
Review
Carpal dislocations result from sequential disruption of the complex relationship between the bones and ligaments of the wrist. Injuries to the carpus occur via predictable mechanisms, an understanding of which is critical to identify and treat these frequently missed patterns of injury and to avoid the sequela of chronic instability. Lunate dislocations are by far the most common, but isolated dislocation of other carpal bones can also occur. Open reduction and internal fixation still remains the gold standard for treatment regardless of the debate around the specific approaches. These high-energy injuries are associated with significant long-term morbidity even when identified promptly and appropriately treated. This review will focus on the evaluation and management of common forms of carpal dislocations.
Topics: Humans; Joint Dislocations; Wrist; Carpal Bones; Disease Progression; Fracture Fixation, Internal
PubMed: 37704022
DOI: 10.1177/17531934231183260 -
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology,... Oct 2022Isolated reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL-R) has become the predominant stabilizing procedure in the treatment of recurrent lateral patellar... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
PURPOSE
Isolated reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL-R) has become the predominant stabilizing procedure in the treatment of recurrent lateral patellar dislocation (LPD). To minimize the risk of re-dislocations, isolated MPFL-R is recommended in patients with no significant trochlea dysplasia and tibial tuberosity trochlear groove distance < 20 mm on computed tomography (CT). Incidentally, these criteria are the same that are used to identify first time LPD patients where conservative treatment is recommended. The purpose of this study was therefore to compare MPFL-R with active rehabilitation for patients with recurrent LPD (RLPD) in absence of the above mentioned underlying anatomical high-risk factors for further patellar dislocations.
METHODS
RLPD-patients aged 12-30 without underlying anatomical high-risk factors for further LPD were randomized into treatment either with isolated MPFL-R or active rehabilitation provided and instructed by a physiotherapist. All patients underwent diagnostic arthroscopy for concomitant problems. The main outcome measure was persistent patellar instability at 12 months. Knee function at baseline and 12 months was asses using the following patient reported outcomes measures (PROMS); KOOS, Kujala, Cincinnati knee rating, Lysholm score and Noyes sports activity rating scale.
RESULTS
Between 2010 and 2019, 61 patients were included in the study (MPFL-R, N = 30, Controls, N = 31). Persistent patellar instability at 12 months was reported by 13 (41.9%) controls, versus 2 (6.7%) in the MPFL-group (RR 6.3 (95% CI 1.5-25.5). No statistically significant differences in activity level were found between the MPFL-group and the Controls at neither baseline nor follow up. The patients with persistent instability at 12 months did not score significantly lower on any of the PROMs compared to their stable peers, regardless of study group.
CONCLUSION
Patients with recurrent patellar dislocations have a six-fold increased risk of persistent patellar instability if treated with active rehabilitation alone, compared to MPFL-R in combination with active rehabilitation, even in the absence of significant anatomical risk factors. Active rehabilitation of the knee without MPFL-R improves patient reported knee function after one year, but does not protect against persistent patellar instability.
Topics: Humans; Joint Dislocations; Joint Instability; Ligaments, Articular; Patella; Patellar Dislocation; Patellofemoral Joint
PubMed: 35347375
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-06934-3 -
American Family Physician Jul 2021
Topics: Acromioclavicular Joint; Humans; Joint Dislocations; Shoulder Dislocation
PubMed: 34264594
DOI: No ID Found -
British Journal of Hospital Medicine... Feb 2023Although uncommon, subtalar joint dislocations remain a frequently missed orthopaedic emergency. Detailed soft tissue and neurovascular assessment is important and these... (Review)
Review
Although uncommon, subtalar joint dislocations remain a frequently missed orthopaedic emergency. Detailed soft tissue and neurovascular assessment is important and these should be documented as appropriate. Failure of urgent reduction might lead to increased risk of conversion to an open injury as a result of pressure necrosis of the overlying skin, risk of talar avascular necrosis and risk of neurovascular compromise. A computed tomography scan is needed in all cases following successful closed or open reduction to identify associated occult foot and ankle fractures. The goal of treatment is to reduce the risk of soft tissue and neurovascular compromise and achieve a supple, painless foot. This article highlights the importance of early identification of this injury and institution of appropriate management according to the latest evidence, to reduce the risk of complications and lead to the best outcomes.
Topics: Humans; Joint Dislocations; Subtalar Joint; Ankle Fractures; Lower Extremity; Necrosis
PubMed: 36848162
DOI: 10.12968/hmed.2022.0211 -
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Jun 2022The need for operative treatment of acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation is unclear. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to compare the... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
No difference in clinical outcome at 2-year follow-up in patients with type III and V acromioclavicular joint dislocation treated with hook plate or physiotherapy: a randomized controlled trial.
BACKGROUND
The need for operative treatment of acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation is unclear. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to compare the outcomes after operative treatment with a hook plate with the outcomes after nonoperative treatment of acute Rockwood type III and type V AC joint dislocations separately.
METHODS
The inclusion criteria were patients aged 18-65 years with an acute type III or type V AC joint dislocation with the availability to start treatment within 3 weeks after trauma. All patients received the same standardized outpatient rehabilitation protocol and were followed up for 24 months. Assessments were based on radiographs, clinical examination findings, and questionnaires. The primary outcome was the Constant score (CS). The secondary outcomes were as follows: Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), QuickDASH score (abbreviated version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire), shoulder pain at rest and during movement rated using a visual analog scale, EQ-5D (European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions) score, patient satisfaction, cosmesis, complications, and adverse events. The 4 groups were compared using 1-way analysis of variance and intention to treat.
RESULTS
The included patients (N = 124) (mean age, 40 years [range, 18-64 years]; 91% male patients) were randomized, stratified by type, to nonoperative treatment (type III, n = 33; type V, n = 30) or operative treatment with a hook plate (type III, n = 30; type V, n = 31) at a single center. Three patients randomized to physiotherapy dropped out before any follow-up measures, leaving 121 patients in the study. Complete clinical follow-up data were obtained from 118 patients at 24 months. At 3 months, patients in both nonoperatively treated groups had a significantly better mean CS, SSV, and QuickDASH score and had less pain at rest and during movement compared with patients treated operatively. At 6, 12, and 24 months, there were no significant differences in the CS, SSV, QuickDASH score, pain, or EQ-5D score between the groups regardless of intervention. At 24 months, the mean CS was 88 for nonoperatively treated type III patients vs. 91 for operatively treated type III patients and was 90 vs. 91 for type V patients (P = .477). At final follow-up, patients had regained 97% of the mean CS comparing the uninjured and injured shoulders and 86% of the patients rated the result as excellent or good. Eleven patients assigned to nonoperative treatment (18%, 6 type III and 5 type V) underwent surgery within 19 months.
CONCLUSIONS
Both the nonoperative and operative treatment groups had very good restoration of shoulder function and patient satisfaction at 24 months, and operative treatment did not lead to better outcomes compared with nonoperative treatment. In conclusion, our study does not support surgery with a hook plate in patients with acute Rockwood type III or type V AC joint dislocations.
Topics: Acromioclavicular Joint; Adult; Bone Plates; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Joint Dislocations; Male; Physical Therapy Modalities; Quality of Life; Shoulder Dislocation; Shoulder Pain; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35007749
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.12.003 -
Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Surgery &... Feb 2022Despite the progress made in the past decades, hip disorders are one of the most common orthopedic problems in the context of paralysis. The etiology can be congenital... (Review)
Review
Despite the progress made in the past decades, hip disorders are one of the most common orthopedic problems in the context of paralysis. The etiology can be congenital (malformation such as myelomeningoceles, genetic neuromuscular disorders) or acquired (cerebral palsy, post-traumatic). In these conditions, the orthopedic deformities are minimal at birth. They can develop as the child grows, at different ages, depending on the etiology, severity of the neuromuscular disorder and functional potential. Hip subluxation and dislocation can compromise standing and walking capacities, but also the quality of the seated position and the personal care. Daily life activities and participation are restricted and influence the disabled person's quality of life. Paralytic dislocation of the hip is the orthopedic deformity that has be biggest impact on day-to-day life, general health and the overall orthopedic result in adulthood. Neuro-orthopedic care is challenging. However, there are basic principles that one must know to ensure good long-term quality of life in patients suffering from paralytic dislocations of the hip. When planning the treatment strategy, it is essential to take into consideration the day-to-day life and to integrate the patient's experiences and needs, along with those of their caretakers. The objective of this review is to outline the differences in paralytic dislocations of the hip of diverse etiology, to present evaluation principles useful in daily clinical practice and to help practitioners in choosing a treatment strategy.
Topics: Adult; Cerebral Palsy; Child; Hip Dislocation; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Joint Dislocations; Paralysis; Quality of Life
PubMed: 34871796
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.103166