-
Drug Design, Development and Therapy 2023Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a condition with abnormal hypertrophy of the left ventricle in the absence of common causes. The most common form involves the basal... (Review)
Review
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a condition with abnormal hypertrophy of the left ventricle in the absence of common causes. The most common form involves the basal septum and can lead to obstruction of the left ventricular outflow tract. Patients can experience exertional symptoms such as chest pain, dyspnea and syncope. Traditional treatment has included beta blockers and nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers with second-line therapy being disopyramide. Recently, mavacamten, a cardiac myosin inhibitor, has demonstrated improvement in quantitative measures of obstruction and symptom relief to such a degree that patients were able to defer invasive management of the disease. This review focuses on the pharmacology of mavacamten, its clinical trial data and guidance on how to incorporate this drug into clinical practice. Furthermore, it discusses emerging therapies currently being investigated for HCM.
Topics: Humans; Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic; Heart; Benzylamines; Calcium Channel Blockers
PubMed: 37064432
DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S368590 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Sep 2019Atrial fibrillation is the most frequent sustained arrhythmia. Atrial fibrillation often recurs after restoration of normal sinus rhythm. Antiarrhythmic drugs have been...
BACKGROUND
Atrial fibrillation is the most frequent sustained arrhythmia. Atrial fibrillation often recurs after restoration of normal sinus rhythm. Antiarrhythmic drugs have been widely used to prevent recurrence. This is an update of a review previously published in 2006, 2012 and 2015.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the effects of long-term treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs on death, stroke, drug adverse effects and recurrence of atrial fibrillation in people who had recovered sinus rhythm after having atrial fibrillation.
SEARCH METHODS
We updated the searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase in January 2019, and ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO ICTRP in February 2019. We checked the reference lists of retrieved articles, recent reviews and meta-analyses.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Two authors independently selected randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any antiarrhythmic drug with a control (no treatment, placebo, drugs for rate control) or with another antiarrhythmic drug in adults who had atrial fibrillation and in whom sinus rhythm was restored, spontaneously or by any intervention. We excluded postoperative atrial fibrillation.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two authors independently assessed quality and extracted data. We pooled studies, if appropriate, using Mantel-Haenszel risk ratios (RR), with 95% confidence intervals (CI). All results were calculated at one year of follow-up or the nearest time point.
MAIN RESULTS
This update included one new study (100 participants) and excluded one previously included study because of double publication. Finally, we included 59 RCTs comprising 20,981 participants studying quinidine, disopyramide, propafenone, flecainide, metoprolol, amiodarone, dofetilide, dronedarone and sotalol. Overall, mean follow-up was 10.2 months.All-cause mortalityHigh-certainty evidence from five RCTs indicated that treatment with sotalol was associated with a higher all-cause mortality rate compared with placebo or no treatment (RR 2.23, 95% CI 1.03 to 4.81; participants = 1882). The number need to treat for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH) for sotalol was 102 participants treated for one year to have one additional death. Low-certainty evidence from six RCTs suggested that risk of mortality may be higher in people taking quinidine (RR 2.01, 95% CI 0.84 to 4.77; participants = 1646). Moderate-certainty evidence showed increased RR for mortality but with very wide CIs for metoprolol (RR 2.02, 95% CI 0.37 to 11.05, 2 RCTs, participants = 562) and amiodarone (RR 1.66, 95% CI 0.55 to 4.99, 2 RCTs, participants = 444), compared with placebo.We found little or no difference in mortality with dofetilide (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.27; moderate-certainty evidence) or dronedarone (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.09; high-certainty evidence) compared to placebo/no treatment. There were few data on mortality for disopyramide, flecainide and propafenone, making impossible a reliable estimation for those drugs.Withdrawals due to adverse eventsAll analysed drugs increased withdrawals due to adverse effects compared to placebo or no treatment (quinidine: RR 1.56, 95% CI 0.87 to 2.78; disopyramide: RR 3.68, 95% CI 0.95 to 14.24; propafenone: RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.46; flecainide: RR 15.41, 95% CI 0.91 to 260.19; metoprolol: RR 3.47, 95% CI 1.48 to 8.15; amiodarone: RR 6.70, 95% CI 1.91 to 23.45; dofetilide: RR 1.77, 95% CI 0.75 to 4.18; dronedarone: RR 1.58, 95% CI 1.34 to 1.85; sotalol: RR 1.95, 95% CI 1.23 to 3.11). Certainty of the evidence for this outcome was low for disopyramide, amiodarone, dofetilide and flecainide; moderate to high for the remaining drugs.ProarrhythmiaVirtually all studied antiarrhythmics showed increased proarrhythmic effects (counting both tachyarrhythmias and bradyarrhythmias attributable to treatment) (quinidine: RR 2.05, 95% CI 0.95 to 4.41; disopyramide: no data; flecainide: RR 4.80, 95% CI 1.30 to 17.77; metoprolol: RR 18.14, 95% CI 2.42 to 135.66; amiodarone: RR 2.22, 95% CI 0.71 to 6.96; dofetilide: RR 5.50, 95% CI 1.33 to 22.76; dronedarone: RR 1.95, 95% CI 0.77 to 4.98; sotalol: RR 3.55, 95% CI 2.16 to 5.83); with the exception of propafenone (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.39 to 4.47) for which the certainty of evidence was very low and we were uncertain about the effect. Certainty of the evidence for this outcome for the other drugs was moderate to high.StrokeEleven studies reported stroke outcomes with quinidine, disopyramide, flecainide, amiodarone, dronedarone and sotalol. High-certainty evidence from two RCTs suggested that dronedarone may be associated with reduced risk of stroke (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.95; participants = 5872). This result is attributed to one study dominating the meta-analysis and has yet to be reproduced in other studies. There was no apparent effect on stroke rates with the other antiarrhythmics.Recurrence of atrial fibrillationModerate- to high-certainty evidence, with the exception of disopyramide which was low-certainty evidence, showed that all analysed drugs, including metoprolol, reduced recurrence of atrial fibrillation (quinidine: RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.88; disopyramide: RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.01; propafenone: RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.74; flecainide: RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.77; metoprolol: RR 0.83 95% CI 0.68 to 1.02; amiodarone: RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.58; dofetilide: RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.85; dronedarone: RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.91; sotalol: RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.87). Despite this reduction, atrial fibrillation still recurred in 43% to 67% of people treated with antiarrhythmics.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There is high-certainty evidence of increased mortality associated with sotalol treatment, and low-certainty evidence suggesting increased mortality with quinidine, when used for maintaining sinus rhythm in people with atrial fibrillation. We found few data on mortality in people taking disopyramide, flecainide and propafenone, so it was not possible to make a reliable estimation of the mortality risk for these drugs. However, we did find moderate-certainty evidence of marked increases in proarrhythmia and adverse effects with flecainide.Overall, there is evidence showing that antiarrhythmic drugs increase adverse events, increase proarrhythmic events and some antiarrhythmics may increase mortality. Conversely, although they reduce recurrences of atrial fibrillation, there is no evidence of any benefit on other clinical outcomes, compared with placebo or no treatment.
Topics: Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Atrial Fibrillation; Electric Countershock; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence; Secondary Prevention
PubMed: 31483500
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005049.pub5 -
Heart International 2023Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a common heridetary cardiac disorder characterized by a wide range of symptoms. The pharmacological treatment of HCM is currently...
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a common heridetary cardiac disorder characterized by a wide range of symptoms. The pharmacological treatment of HCM is currently limited to beta blockers, non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers and disopyramide. Mavacamten is a novel cardiac myosin inhibitor, which was recently added to the limited pharmacological list of treatment options for HCM. This editorial elaborates on current evidence evaluating the use of mavacamten in patients with symptomatic obstructive HCM, comments on its current use and its expanded potential applications in the future.
PubMed: 37456351
DOI: 10.17925/HI.2023.17.1.2 -
International Journal of Cardiology Jan 2023Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) is present in 1/3 of children with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM). Disopyramide improves symptoms associated with...
BACKGROUND
Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) is present in 1/3 of children with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM). Disopyramide improves symptoms associated with LVOTO and delays surgical intervention in adults, but it is not licensed in children.
AIM
To describe a single-centre thirty-year experience of using disopyramide to treat LVOTO-related symptoms in a paediatric HCM cohort.
METHODS
Clinical data were collected for all patients meeting diagnostic criteria for HCM (<18 years) at the time of initiation, 6 months after, and last follow-up or end of disopyramide treatment. It included demographics, clinical history, 12‑lead electrocardiography, and echocardiography. Comparisons between baseline and 6 month follow up, and end of follow up respectively were performed.
RESULTS
Fifty-one patients with HCM were started on disopyramide at a mean age 10.2±5.3 years. At 6 months, of those previously symptomatic, 33(86.8%) reported an improvement of symptoms and 12(31.6%) were asymptomatic. PR interval, corrected QT interval and maximal LVOT gradient had not significantly changed, but fewer participants were noted to have systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve 31 (72.1%) vs. 26 (57.80%). Patients were followed up for a median of 1.9 years (IQR 0.83-4.5). Nine patients (17.6%) reported side effects, and eleven patients (33.3%) with initial improvement in symptoms reported a return or worsening of symptoms requiring a change in medication (n = 4, 12.1%) or left ventricular septal myomectomy (n = 7, 21.2%) during follow up.
CONCLUSION
Disopyramide is a safe and effective treatment for LVOTO-related symptoms in childhood obstructive HCM. Any delay in the need for invasive intervention, particularly during childhood, is of clear clinical benefit.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Child; Child, Preschool; Adolescent; Disopyramide; Ventricular Outflow Obstruction; Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic; Echocardiography; Heart Ventricles
PubMed: 36174821
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.09.044 -
Cardiology and Therapy Dec 2022Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a genetic disorder caused by pathogenic variants in sarcomeric genes, leading to left ventricular hypertrophy and complex phenotypic... (Review)
Review
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a genetic disorder caused by pathogenic variants in sarcomeric genes, leading to left ventricular hypertrophy and complex phenotypic heterogeneity. While HCM is the most common inherited cardiomyopathy, pharmacological treatment options have previously been limited and were predominantly directed towards symptom control owing to left ventricular outflow obstruction. These therapies, including beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, and disopyramide, have not been shown to affect the natural history of the disease, which is of particular concern for younger patients who have an increased lifetime risk of experiencing arrhythmias, heart failure, and sudden cardiac death. Increased knowledge of the genetic mechanisms underlying this disease in recent years has led to the development of targeted, potentially disease-modifying therapies for both obstructive and nonobstructive phenotypes that may help to prevent or ameliorate left ventricular hypertrophy. In this review article, we will define the etiology and clinical phenotypes of HCM, summarize the conventional therapies for obstructive HCM, discuss the emerging targeted therapies as well as novel invasive approaches for obstructive HCM, describe the therapeutic advances for nonobstructive HCM, and outline the future directions for the treatment of HCM.
PubMed: 36243823
DOI: 10.1007/s40119-022-00283-5 -
Cardiology Research Aug 2023Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is one of the most common genetic inherited diseases of myocardium, which is caused by mutation in genes encoding proteins for the cardiac... (Review)
Review
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is one of the most common genetic inherited diseases of myocardium, which is caused by mutation in genes encoding proteins for the cardiac sarcomere. It is the most frequent cause of sudden death in young people and trained athletes. All diagnostic methods, including heart catheterization, transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging, genetic counseling and tissue biopsy are required for risk and therapy stratification and should be individualized depending on phenotype and genotype. Current therapy has not been tested adequately. Beta-blockers and verapamil can cause hypotension which can make hypertrophic cardiomyopathy worse. Disopyramide has been inadequately studied, and mavacamten was only studied in small trials. More definitive trials are currently ongoing. Novel invasive and noninvasive diagnostics, medical therapies, interventional and surgical approaches tend to influence the natural history of the disease, favoring a better future for this patient population.
PubMed: 37559708
DOI: 10.14740/cr1514