-
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2023SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are now the mainstay therapy for both diabetes and heart failure. publications, meta-analysis, and conference presentations of the eight... (Review)
Review
SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are now the mainstay therapy for both diabetes and heart failure. publications, meta-analysis, and conference presentations of the eight SGLT2i Cardiovascular Outcomes trials (CVOTS) done in diabetic patients constantly echo that this class of drug decreases mortality, reduces cardiovascular events, and prevents heart failure and kidney disease. This review of medical agencies' SGLT2i analysis (FDA and EMA) helps to understand the reality of SGLT2i results in those trials, avoiding to consider observational and statistically undemonstrated endpoints as validated. They also confirmed the unique diuretic mode of action of SGLT2i, promoting osmotic diuresis, and its potential adverse events secondary to hypovolemia and hematocrit increase. They also support the understanding that the beliefs in SGLT2i morbi-mortality benefits are largely overstated mostly based on undemonstrated endpoints. Finally, it is clear that SGLT2i's antidiabetic action, secondary to its renal mode of action, plateaued after a few months and decreased strongly over time, questioning its long-term goal of maintaining diabetic patients' HbA1c below 7%. Also, this effect in patients with renal impairment is quasi null. We think that this review would be very helpful to every physician treating diabetic patients to better balance belief and reality of SGLT2i prescription effects.
Topics: Humans; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diuretics; Glucosides; Heart Failure; Observational Studies as Topic; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors
PubMed: 37547306
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1174692 -
International Journal of Molecular... Jul 2023Despite recent advances in heart failure (HF) therapy, the risk of cardiovascular (CV) mortality, morbidity, and HF hospitalization (HFH) are major challenges in HF... (Review)
Review
Despite recent advances in heart failure (HF) therapy, the risk of cardiovascular (CV) mortality, morbidity, and HF hospitalization (HFH) are major challenges in HF treatment. We aimed to review the potential of vericiguat as a treatment option for HF. A systematic literature review was performed using the PubMed database and ClinicalTrials.gov. Four randomized controlled trials were identified, which study the safety and efficacy of vericiguat in HF patients. Vericiguat activates soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) by binding to the beta-subunit, bypassing the requirement for NO-induced activation. The nitric oxide (NO)-sGC-cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) pathway plays an essential role in cardiovascular (CV) regulation and the protection of healthy cardiac function but is impaired in HF. Vericiguat reduced the risk of CV death and HFH in HF patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) but showed no therapeutic effect on HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The trials demonstrated a favorable safety profile with most common adverse events such as hypotension, syncope, and anemia. Therefore, vericiguat is recommended for patients with HFrEF and a minimum systolic blood pressure of 100 mmHg. Treatment with vericiguat is considered when the individual patient experiences decompensation despite being on guideline-recommended medication, e.g., angiotensin-converting inhibitor/AT1 receptor antagonist, beta-adrenoceptor antagonist, spironolactone, and sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitors. Furthermore, larger studies are required to investigate any potential effect of vericiguat in HFpEF patients. Despite the limitations, vericiguat can be recommended for patients with HFrEF, where standard-of-care is insufficient, and the disease worsens.
Topics: Humans; Heart Failure; Treatment Outcome; Stroke Volume; Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase; Cardiotonic Agents; Diuretics
PubMed: 37511587
DOI: 10.3390/ijms241411826 -
American Journal of Physiology. Renal... Sep 2022Loop diuretics are commonly used diuretics in the treatment of fluid retention but induce hypovolemia-related renal dysfunction. Na-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2)...
Loop diuretics are commonly used diuretics in the treatment of fluid retention but induce hypovolemia-related renal dysfunction. Na-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors induce osmotic diuresis, but body fluid volume is maintained by stimulating vasopressin-induced fluid intake and collecting duct water reabsorption as previously reported in diabetic rats. We aimed to test the hypothesis that unlike SGLT2 inhibitors, loop diuretics lack activation of similar fluid homeostatic mechanisms. Nondiabetic male Sprague-Dawley rats were treated daily by oral gavage with vehicle, the SGLT2 inhibitor ipragliflozin (5 mg/kg), or the loop diuretic furosemide (50 mg/kg) and monitored in metabolic cages for 2 or 7 days. Ipragliflozin and furosemide similarly increased urine volume on . This was associated with increased serum Na concentration, urine vasopressin excretion, fluid intake, and solute-free water reabsorption in response to ipragliflozin but not to furosemide. Ipragliflozin maintained fluid balance (fluid intake - urine volume) on and total body water measured by bioimpedance spectroscopy and serum creatinine on . In comparison, furosemide decreased fluid balance on and decreased total body water and increased serum creatinine on . Furosemide, but not ipragliflozin, increased plasma renin activity, and systolic blood pressure was similar among the groups. In conclusion, the osmotic diuresis of the SGLT2 inhibitor increased serum Na concentration and the vasopressin-related stimulation of fluid intake and renal water retention maintained fluid balance, whereas the loop diuretic did not engage the compensatory vasopressin system. The data suggest differences in vasopressin and fluid homeostatic responses between SGLT2 inhibitors and loop diuretics. In nondiabetic rats, the Na-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor ipragliflozin increased vasopressin-related stimulation of fluid intake and free water reabsorption and maintained fluid balance and serum creatinine, whereas the loop diuretic furosemide reduced vasopressin and induced a negative fluid balance followed by a subsequent increase in serum creatinine. This study suggests that differences in vasopressin secretion in response to a SGLT2 inhibitor or loop diuretic may contribute to differences in body fluid status and subsequent renal function.
Topics: Animals; Creatinine; Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental; Diuretics; Furosemide; Glucose; Male; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Sodium; Sodium Potassium Chloride Symporter Inhibitors; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Vasopressins; Water
PubMed: 35900341
DOI: 10.1152/ajprenal.00070.2022 -
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy =... Jan 2023Edema caused by kidney disease is called renal edema. Edema is a common symptom of many human kidney diseases. Patients with renal edema often need to take... (Review)
Review
Edema caused by kidney disease is called renal edema. Edema is a common symptom of many human kidney diseases. Patients with renal edema often need to take diuretics.However, After taking diuretics, patients with kidney diseases are prone to kidney congestion, decreased renal perfusion, decreased diuretics secreted by renal tubules, neuroendocrine system abnormalities, abnormal ion transporter transport, drug interaction, electrolyte disorder, and hypoproteinemia, which lead to ineffective or weakened diuretic use and increase readmission rate and mortality. The main causes and coping strategies of diuretic resistance in patients with kidney diseases were described in detail in this report. The common causes of DR included poor diet (electrolyte disturbance and hypoproteinemia due to patients' failure to limit diet according to correct sodium, chlorine, potassium, and protein level) and poor drug compliance (the patient did not take adequate doses of diuretics. true resistance occurs only if the patient takes adequate doses of diuretics, but they are not effective), changes in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, electrolyte disorders, changes in renal adaptation, functional nephron reduction, and decreased renal blood flow. Common treatment measures include increasing in the diuretic dose and/or frequency, sequential nephron blockade,using new diuretics, ultrafiltration treatment, etc. In clinical work, measures should be taken to prevent or delay the occurrence and development of DR in patients with kidney diseases according to the actual situation of patients and the mechanism of various causes. Currently, there are many studies on DR in patients with heart diseases. Although the phenomenon of DR in patients with kidney diseases is common, there is a relatively little overview of the mechanism and treatment strategy of DR in patients with kidney diseases. Therefore, this paper hopes to show the information on DR in patients with kidney diseases to clinicians and researchers and broaden the research direction and ideas to a certain extent.
Topics: Humans; Diuretics; Heart Failure; Kidney Diseases; Kidney; Sodium; Water-Electrolyte Imbalance; Edema; Drug Resistance
PubMed: 36473405
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.114058 -
Cardiorenal Medicine 2024Increased renal sodium avidity is a hallmark feature of the heart failure syndrome. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Increased renal sodium avidity is a hallmark feature of the heart failure syndrome.
SUMMARY
Increased renal sodium avidity refers to the inability of the kidneys to elicit potent natriuresis in response to sodium loading. This eventually causes congestion, which is a major contributor to hospital admissions and mortality in heart failure.
KEY MESSAGES
Important novel concepts such as the renal tamponade hypothesis, accelerated nephron loss, and the role of hypochloremia, the sympathetic nervous system, inflammation, the lymphatic system, and interstitial sodium buffers are involved in the pathophysiology of renal sodium avidity. A good understanding of these concepts is crucially important with respect to treatment recommendations regarding dietary sodium restriction, fluid restriction, rapid up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapies, combination diuretic therapy, natriuresis-guided diuretic therapy, use of hypertonic saline, and ultrafiltration.
Topics: Humans; Heart Failure; Sodium; Kidney; Natriuresis; Diuretics; Cardio-Renal Syndrome
PubMed: 38565080
DOI: 10.1159/000538601 -
Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine Dec 2021Hospitalization for congestive heart failure represents a growing burden for health care systems. Heart failure is characterized by extracellular fluid overload and loop... (Review)
Review
Hospitalization for congestive heart failure represents a growing burden for health care systems. Heart failure is characterized by extracellular fluid overload and loop diuretics have been for decades the cornerstone of therapy in these patients. However, extensive use of intra-venous diuretics is characterised by several limitations: risk of worsening renal function and electrolyte imbalance, symptomatic hypotension and development of diuretic resistance. Extracorporealveno-venous ultrafiltration (UF) represents an interesting adjunctive therapy to target congestion in patients with heart failure and fluid overload. UF consists of the mechanical removal of iso-tonic plasma water from the blood through a semipermeable membrane using a pressure gradient generated by a pump. Fluid removal through UF presents several advantages such as removal of higher amount of sodium, predictable effect, limited neuro-hormonal activation, and enhanced spontaneous diuresis and diuretic response. After twenty years of "early" studies, since 2000 some pilot studies and randomized clinical trials with modern devices have been carried out with somehow conflicting results, as discussed in this review. In addition, some practical aspects of UF are addressed.
Topics: Diuretics; Heart Failure; Hospitalization; Humans; Ultrafiltration; Water-Electrolyte Imbalance
PubMed: 34957772
DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2204137 -
Canadian Family Physician Medecin de... Feb 2020
Review
Topics: Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Diuretics; Humans; Hydrochlorothiazide; Hypertension
PubMed: 32060193
DOI: No ID Found -
American Journal of Physiology. Renal... Mar 2023Sex differences in renal function and blood pressure have been widely described across many species. Blood pressure dips during sleep and peaks in the early morning....
Sex differences in renal function and blood pressure have been widely described across many species. Blood pressure dips during sleep and peaks in the early morning. Similarly, glomerular filtration rate, filtered electrolyte loads, urine volume, and urinary excretion all exhibit notable diurnal rhythms, which reflect, in part, the regulation of renal transporter proteins by circadian clock genes. That regulation is sexually dimorphic; as such, sex and time of day are not two independent regulators of kidney function and blood pressure. The objective of the present study was to assess the effect of sex and administration time on the natriuretic and diuretic effects of loop, thiazide, and K-sparing diuretics, which are common treatments for hypertension. Loop diuretics inhibit Na-K-2Cl cotransporters on the apical membrane of the thick ascending limb, thiazide diuretics inhibit Na-Cl cotransporters on the distal convoluted tubule, and K-sparing diuretics inhibit epithelial Na channels on the connecting tubule and collecting duct. We simulated Na transporter inhibition using sex- and time-of-day-specific computational models of mouse kidney function. The simulation results highlighted significant sex and time-of-day differences in the drug response. Loop diuretics induced larger natriuretic and diuretic effects during the active phase. The natriuretic and diuretic effects of thiazide diuretics exhibited sex and time-of-day differences, whereas these effects of K-sparing diuretics exhibited a significant time-of-day difference in females only. The kaliuretic effect depended on the type of diuretics and time of administration. The present computational models can be a useful tool in chronotherapy, to tailor drug administration time to match the body's diurnal rhythms to optimize the drug effect. Sex influences cardiovascular disease, and the timing of onset of acute cardiovascular events exhibits circadian rhythms. Kidney function also exhibits sex differences and circadian rhythms. How do the natriuretic and diuretic effects of diuretics, a common treatment for hypertension that targets the kidneys, differ between the sexes? And how do these effects vary during the day? To answer these questions, we conducted computer simulations to assess the effects of loop, thiazide, and K-sparing diuretics.
Topics: Female; Male; Mice; Animals; Diuretics; Sodium Chloride Symporter Inhibitors; Sodium Potassium Chloride Symporter Inhibitors; Hypertension; Kidney Tubules, Distal; Sodium; Thiazides
PubMed: 36701479
DOI: 10.1152/ajprenal.00296.2022 -
JACC. Heart Failure Sep 2022
Topics: Diuretics; Heart Failure; Humans
PubMed: 36049814
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2022.06.008 -
JACC. Heart Failure Jan 2024The EMPEROR-Reduced (EMPagliflozin outcomE tRial in Patients With chrOnic heaRt Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction) trial established the efficacy of empagliflozin... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
The EMPEROR-Reduced (EMPagliflozin outcomE tRial in Patients With chrOnic heaRt Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction) trial established the efficacy of empagliflozin in reducing heart failure (HF) outcomes among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
OBJECTIVES
The authors examined the outcomes of EMPEROR-Reduced as a function of background diuretic therapy.
METHODS
The EMPEROR-Reduced trial was a double-blind, randomized controlled trial of placebo vs empagliflozin 10 mg among 3,730 HFrEF patients. Herein, the population was stratified into 4 groups: no diuretic and diuretic dose equivalent to furosemide <40, 40, and >40 mg daily at baseline.
RESULTS
A total of 3,656 patients from the EMPEROR-Reduced trial were available for analysis. Of those patients, 482 (13.2%) were receiving no diuretic therapy, and 731 (20.0%), 1,411 (38.6%), and 1,032 (28.2%) were receiving <40 mg, 40 mg, and >40 mg, respectively. The efficacy of empagliflozin on the primary outcome (time to first event of hospitalization for HF or cardiovascular [CV] death) was consistent regardless of background diuretic therapy (>40 mg: HR: 0.88 [95% CI: 0.71-1.10]; 40 mg: HR: 0.65 [95% CI: 0.51-0.82]; <40 mg: HR: 0.65 [95% CI: 0.46-0.92]); no diuretic agents: HR: 0.78 [95% CI: 0.47-1.29]; P = 0.192). Baseline diuretic doses did not influence the effect of empagliflozin on body weight, systolic blood pressure, NT-proBNP, or hematocrit at 52 weeks. The safety profile of empagliflozin vs placebo was unaffected by baseline diuretic dose; however, independently of treatment allocation, total rates of adverse events were higher among patients with higher baseline doses of diuretic agents.
CONCLUSIONS
Empagliflozin exhibits a consistent effect on time to CV death or HF hospitalization and an unaltered safety profile regardless of baseline diuretic therapy. (EMPagliflozin outcomE tRial in Patients With chrOnic heaRt Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction [EMPEROR-Reduced]; NCT03057977).
Topics: Humans; Benzhydryl Compounds; Chronic Disease; Diuretics; Heart Failure; Stroke Volume; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left
PubMed: 37715769
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2023.06.036