-
Archives of Razi Institute Jun 2023In the transdermal drug delivery system, the drug is administered through the skin and attains a systemic effect. It is a drug administration route that includes drug...
In the transdermal drug delivery system, the drug is administered through the skin and attains a systemic effect. It is a drug administration route that includes drug transport to the epidermis and potentially dermal tissue of the skin for locally therapeutic effect, while an exceptionally significant drug division is transported in systemic blood circulation. This study aimed to formulate rasagiline mesylate (RM) as a transdermal microneedle (MN) delivery. The RM is an antiparkinson drug that can be classified as class III with low permeability and subjected to extensive first-pass metabolism. At first, it was formulated as nanoparticles using the chitosan polymer and ion gelation method. Afterward, the prepared nanoparticles were incorporated into a transdermal MN formulated by a polydimethylsiloxane template. The two-step casting process uses two polymer concentrations of polyvinyl alcohol and mixes them with other polymers in a 3:1 ratio (polyvinylpyrrolidone and chitosan) and glycerin as a plasticizer. The selected MN formula was MN4 with a promising shape, no bubbles, fine and well-formed sharp needles that passed the folding endurance test with 130 folding times before broken, drug content of 97±10.02%, and permeation. The results showed a significant (>0.05) permeability enhancement and increase of flux (160%), compared to the transdermal patch. The RS polymeric nanoparticles were successfully prepared and loaded within dissolving MNs of sufficient mechanical strength to penetrate the stratum corneum and enhance the amount permeated through it to induce the systemic effect transdermally.
Topics: Animals; Chitosan; Administration, Cutaneous; Skin; Nanoparticles
PubMed: 38028835
DOI: 10.22092/ARI.2022.360192.2562 -
European Journal of Pediatrics May 2022Experienced drug-handling problems and inadequately considered expectations for drug therapy have an unfavorable influence on therapy. We performed a questionnaire...
Experienced drug-handling problems and inadequately considered expectations for drug therapy have an unfavorable influence on therapy. We performed a questionnaire survey in (i) parents of 0-5-year-old children and (ii) 6-17-year olds and their parents. We assessed (A) experienced drug-handling problems and (B) expectations for drug therapy. (i) Forty-six parents and (ii) 103 children and their parents participated in the study. Experienced drug-handling problems were described by (i) 100% of parents and (ii) 62% of children and 70% of parents. Problems concerned with the preparation of the drug, dosing, compliance with the time interval, and acceptance. (i) Sixty-five percent of parents preferred a peroral route of drug administration, while (ii) 74% of children and 86% of parents did so. Preferred characteristics of peroral drug formulations, e.g., liquid versus solid drug formulations or flavor, were highly heterogeneous. Preferences of 6-17-year-old children and their parents matched in 43 to 66%. Conclusion: Most children and their parents had already experienced drug-handling problems. Preferences concerning the ideal pediatric drug were highly heterogeneous and in about half of cases, preferences of children and their parents differed. Thus, the children should be approached directly. If information is solely gained from parents, the children's needs might remain unmet. What is Known: • Pediatric drug administration is complex and therefore error-prone. • Experiences and expectations of children and their parents should be considered. What is New: •Most pediatric patients and their parents have already experienced drug-handling problems. • Expectations concerning the ideal pediatric drug are highly heterogeneous. Parents are often insufficiently aware of those expectations in their children.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Child; Child, Preschool; Humans; Motivation; Parents; Patient Compliance; Surveys and Questionnaires
PubMed: 35199240
DOI: 10.1007/s00431-022-04419-6 -
Resuscitation Dec 2022Recent evidence showing the clinical effectiveness of drug therapy in cardiac arrest has led to renewed interest in the optimal route for drug administration in adult... (Review)
Review
Recent evidence showing the clinical effectiveness of drug therapy in cardiac arrest has led to renewed interest in the optimal route for drug administration in adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Current resuscitation guidelines support use of the intravenous route for intra-arrest drug delivery, with the intraosseous route reserved for patients in whom intravenous access cannot be established. We sought to evaluate current evidence on drug route for administration of cardiac arrest drugs, with a specific focus on the intravenous and intraosseous route. We identified relevant animal, manikin, and human studies through targeted searches of MEDLINE in June 2022. Across pre-hospital systems, there is wide variation in use of the intraosseous route. Early administration of cardiac arrest drugs is associated with improved patient outcomes. Challenges in obtaining intravenous access mean that the intraosseous access may facilitate earlier drug administration. However, time from administration to the central circulation is unclear with pharmacokinetic data limited mainly to animal studies. Observational studies comparing the effect of intravenous and intraosseous drug administration on patient outcomes are challenging to interpret because of resuscitation time bias and other confounders. To date, no randomised controlled trial has directly compared the effect on patient outcomes of intraosseous compared with intravenous drug administration in cardiac arrest. The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation has described the urgent need for randomised controlled trials comparing the intravenous and intraosseous route in adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Ongoing clinical trials will directly address this knowledge gap.
Topics: Adult; Animals; Humans; Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Infusions, Intraosseous; Infusions, Intravenous; Administration, Intravenous; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
PubMed: 36309248
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.10.015 -
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology Jun 2023Topical route of administration is very important and the most commonly used method of drug delivery for treatment of ocular diseases. However, due to unique anatomical... (Review)
Review
Topical route of administration is very important and the most commonly used method of drug delivery for treatment of ocular diseases. However, due to unique anatomical and physiological barriers of eye, it is difficult to achieve the therapeutic concentration in the targeted tissue within the eye. To overcome the effect of these barriers in absorption and to provide targeted and sustained drug delivery, various advances have been made in developing safe and efficient drug delivery systems. Various formulation strategies for ocular drug delivery are used, like basic formulation techniques for improving availability of drugs, viscosity enhancers, and use of mucoadhesives for drug retention and penetration enhancers to promote drug transport to the eye. In this review, we present a summary of the current literature to understand the anatomical and physiological limitations in achieving adequate ocular bioavailability and targeted drug delivery of topically applied drugs and use of new techniques in formulating dosage forms in overcoming these limitations. The recent and future advances in nanocarrier-mediated drug delivery may have the potential to provide patient-friendly and noninvasive techniques for the treatment of diseases related to the anterior and posterior segments of the eye.
Topics: Humans; Drug Delivery Systems; Eye; Eye Diseases; Administration, Topical; Biological Availability
PubMed: 37322644
DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1893_22 -
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine Jan 2023Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD) are the most prevalent neurodegenerative diseases, affecting millions and costing billions each year in the United... (Review)
Review
Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD) are the most prevalent neurodegenerative diseases, affecting millions and costing billions each year in the United States alone. Despite tremendous progress in developing therapeutics that manage the symptoms of these two diseases, the scientific community has yet to develop a treatment that effectively slows down, inhibits, or cures neurodegeneration. To gain a better understanding of the current therapeutic frontier for the treatment of AD and PD, we provide a review on past and present therapeutic strategies for these two major neurodegenerative disorders in the clinical trial process. We briefly recap currently US Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies, and then explore trends in clinical trials across the variables of therapy mechanism of disease intervention, administration route, use of delivery vehicle, and outcome measures, across the clinical phases over time for "Drug" and "Biologic" therapeutics. We then present the success rate of past clinical trials and analyze the intersections in therapeutic approaches for AD and PD, revealing the shift in clinical trials away from therapies targeting neurotransmitter systems that provide symptomatic relief, and towards anti-aggregation, anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant, and regeneration strategies that aim to inhibit the root causes of disease progression. We also highlight the evolving distribution of the types of "Biologic" therapies investigated, and the slowly increasing yet still severe under-utilization of delivery vehicles for AD and PD therapeutics. We then briefly discuss novel preclinical strategies for treating AD and PD. Overall, this review aims to provide a succinct overview of the clinical landscape of AD and PD therapies to better understand the field's therapeutic strategy in the past and the field's evolution in approach to the present, to better inform how to effectively treat AD and PD in the future.
PubMed: 36684083
DOI: 10.1002/btm2.10367 -
International Journal of Molecular... Mar 2021Oral administration of medications is highly preferred in healthcare owing to its simplicity and convenience; however, problems of drug membrane permeability can arise... (Review)
Review
Oral administration of medications is highly preferred in healthcare owing to its simplicity and convenience; however, problems of drug membrane permeability can arise with any administration method in drug discovery and development. In particular, commonly used monoclonal antibody (mAb) drugs are directly injected through intravenous or subcutaneous routes across physical barriers such as the cell membrane, including the epithelium and endothelium. However, intravenous administration has disadvantages such as pain, discomfort, and stress. Oral administration is an ideal route for mAbs. Nonetheless, proteolysis and denaturation, in addition to membrane impermeability, pose serious challenges in delivering peroral mAbs to the systemic circulation, biologically, through enzymatic and acidic blocks and, physically, through the small intestinal epithelium barrier. A number of clinical trials have been performed using oral mAbs for the local treatment of gastrointestinal diseases, some of which have adopted capsules or tablets as formulations. Surprisingly, no oral mAbs have been approved clinically. An enteric nanodelivery system can protect cargos from proteolysis and denaturation. Moreover, mAb cargos released in the small intestine may be delivered to the systemic circulation across the intestinal epithelium through receptor-mediated transcytosis. Oral Abs in milk are transported by neonatal Fc receptors to the systemic circulation in neonates. Thus, well-designed approaches can establish oral mAb delivery. In this review, I will introduce the implementation and possibility of delivering orally administered mAbs with or without nanoparticles not only to the local gastrointestinal tract but also to the systemic circulation.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Albumins; Animals; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Delivery Systems; Endocytosis; Humans; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; Immunotherapy; Intestinal Mucosa; Intestine, Small; Mice; Nanoparticles; Norovirus; Peptides; Rats; Transcytosis
PubMed: 33805888
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22073349 -
Acta Pharmaceutica (Zagreb, Croatia) Jun 2022Nebulization is a very effective method of drug administration. This technique has been popular since ancient times when inhalation of plants rich in tropane alkaloids... (Review)
Review
Nebulization is a very effective method of drug administration. This technique has been popular since ancient times when inhalation of plants rich in tropane alkaloids with spasmolytic and analgesic effects was widely used. Undoubtedly, the invention of anasthesia in the 19th century had an influence on the development of this technique. It resulted in the search for devices that facilitated anasthesia such as pulveriser or hydronium. From the second half of the 21st century, when the first DPI and MDI inhalers were launched, the constant development of aerosol therapy has been noticed. This is due to the fact that nebulization, compared with other means of medicinal substance application (such as oral and intravenous routes of administration), is safer and it exhibits a positive dose/efficacy ratio connected to the reduction of the dose. It enables drugs administration through the lung and possesses very fast onset action. Therefore, various drugs prescribed in respiratory diseases (such as corticosteroids, β-agonists, anticholinergics) are present on the market in a form of an aerosol.
Topics: Nebulizers and Vaporizers; Administration, Inhalation; Aerosols; Metered Dose Inhalers; Dry Powder Inhalers
PubMed: 36651510
DOI: 10.2478/acph-2022-0017 -
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 2020The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a surge in need for alternative routes of administration of drugs for end of life and palliative care,... (Review)
Review
The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a surge in need for alternative routes of administration of drugs for end of life and palliative care, particularly in community settings. Transmucosal routes include intranasal, buccal, sublingual and rectal. They are non-invasive routes for systemic drug delivery with the possibility of self-administration, or administration by family caregivers. In addition, their ability to offer rapid onset of action with reduced first-pass metabolism make them suitable for use in palliative and end-of-life care to provide fast relief of symptoms. This is particularly important in COVID-19, as patients can deteriorate rapidly. Despite the advantages, these routes of administration face challenges including a relatively small surface area for effective drug absorption, small volume of fluid for drug dissolution and the presence of a mucus barrier, thereby limiting the number of drugs that are suitable to be delivered through the transmucosal route. In this review, the merits, challenges and limitations of each of these transmucosal routes are discussed. The goals are to provide insights into using transmucosal drug delivery to bring about the best possible symptom management for patients at the end of life, and to inspire scientists to develop new delivery systems to provide effective symptom management for this group of patients.
Topics: Administration, Mucosal; COVID-19; Drug Delivery Systems; Humans; Palliative Care; Pandemics; Terminal Care; COVID-19 Drug Treatment
PubMed: 33137363
DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2020.10.018 -
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 2020Drug delivery systems are developed to maximize drug efficacy and minimize side effects. As drug delivery technologies improve, the drug becomes safer and more... (Review)
Review
Drug delivery systems are developed to maximize drug efficacy and minimize side effects. As drug delivery technologies improve, the drug becomes safer and more comfortable for patients to use. During the last seven decades, extraordinary progress has been made in drug delivery technologies, such as systems for long-term delivery for months and years, localized delivery, and targeted delivery. The advances, however, will face a next phase considering the future technologies we need to overcome many physicochemical barriers for new formulation development and biological unknowns for treating various diseases. For immediate and long-term progress into the future, the drug delivery field should use time and resources for more translatable research ideas. The drug delivery discipline has to continue working on basic, applied, translational, and clinical research in a concerted manner to produce drug delivery systems that work for patients. It is a time to focus our attention on things that matter. It is also a time to develop realistic research goals and outcomes, diversify drug delivery technologies, and take the collective responsibility for our actions.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Blood-Brain Barrier; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; Drug Administration Routes; Drug Carriers; Drug Delivery Systems; Humans; Lymphatic System; Models, Animal; Nanomedicine; Neoplasms; Translational Research, Biomedical
PubMed: 32592727
DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2020.06.018 -
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry Jul 2019Transdermal delivery is an alternative to oral routes of drug administration and has made considerable contributions to the treatment of various medical diseases. With... (Review)
Review
Transdermal delivery is an alternative to oral routes of drug administration and has made considerable contributions to the treatment of various medical diseases. With the advent of new transdermal delivery technologies, higher numbers of medications are being approved for use as transdermal formulations. This route of administration has several innate advantages that have the potential to benefit various patient populations, including those with central nervous system disorders. The current review briefly outlines the history of transdermal medications, discusses the advantages and disadvantages of transdermal formulations, and examines the challenges and opportunities present for the use of transdermal treatments in psychiatry. Patients with psychiatric illnesses have many unmet needs that may be filled through the benefits gained from transdermal treatments, such as reduced dosing frequency, effective control of plasma medication concentrations, improved tolerability, ability to check compliance visually, and avoidance of first-pass hepatic metabolism. Established transdermal treatments for various psychiatric diseases are discussed followed by an introduction to therapies that are being developed as the first patch formulations for the treatment of schizophrenia. Hypothetical schizophrenia patient profiles are also outlined to aid providers in considering how transdermal treatments for this disease may fill unmet needs for specific patients. The evidence demonstrating the potential benefits of transdermal treatments in psychiatry presented in the current review should both encourage health care providers to consider how patients may benefit from transdermal alternatives and promote future innovation in the area of transdermal drug delivery for psychiatric disorders.
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Humans; Mental Disorders; Psychotropic Drugs; Transdermal Patch
PubMed: 31318185
DOI: 10.4088/JCP.18nr12554