-
World Journal of Clinical Cases Sep 2022A post-bulbar duodenal ulcer (PBDU) is an ulcer in the duodenum that is distal to the duodenal bulb. PBDU may coexist with a synchronous posterior ulcer in rare...
BACKGROUND
A post-bulbar duodenal ulcer (PBDU) is an ulcer in the duodenum that is distal to the duodenal bulb. PBDU may coexist with a synchronous posterior ulcer in rare occurrences, resulting in a kissing ulcer (KU). Duodenocaval fistula (DCF) is another uncommon but potentially fatal complication related to PBDU. There is limited knowledge of the scenarios in which PBDU is complicated by KU and DCF simultaneously.
CASE SUMMARY
A 22-year-old man was admitted to the emergency department with abdominal pain, stiffness, and vomiting. The X-ray showed pneumoperitoneum, suggesting a perforated viscus. Laparotomy revealed a KU with anterior perforation and a DCF. After Kocherization, venorrahphy was used to control caval bleeding. Due to the critical condition of the patient, only primary duodenorrahphy with gastrojejunostomy was performed as a damage control strategy. However, later, the patient developed obstructive jaundice and leakage, and two additional jejunal perforations were detected. Due to the poor condition of the duodenum and the involvement of the ampulla in the posterior ulcer, neither primary repair nor pancreatic-free duodenectomy and ampulloplasty/ampullary reimplantation were considered viable; therefore, an emergency pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed, along with resection and anastomosis of the two jejunal perforations. The patient had a smooth recovery after surgery and was discharged after 27 d.
CONCLUSION
The timely diagnosis of PBDU and radical surgery can aid in the smooth recovery of patients, even in the most complex cases.
PubMed: 36157647
DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i25.9071 -
Life (Basel, Switzerland) Apr 2024Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a complex and high-skill demanding procedure often associated with significant morbidity and mortality. However, the results have...
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a complex and high-skill demanding procedure often associated with significant morbidity and mortality. However, the results have improved over the past two decades. However, there is a paucity of research concerning the learning curve for PD. Our aim was to report the outcomes of 100 consecutive PDs representing a single surgeon's learning curve and to depict the factors that influenced the learning process.
METHODS
We reviewed the first 121 PDs performed at our academic center (2013-2019) by a single surgeon; 110 were PDs (5 laparoscopic and 105 open) and 11 were total PDs (1 laparoscopic and 10 open). Subsequent statistics was performed on the first 100 PDs, with attention paid to the learning curve and survival rate at 5 years. The data were analyzed comparing the first 50 cases (Group 1) to the last 50 cases (Group 2).
RESULTS
The most frequent histopathological tumor type was pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (50%). A total of 39% of patients had preoperative biliary drainage and 45% presented with positive biliary cultures. The preferred reconstruction technique included pancreaticogastrostomy (99%), in situ hepaticojejunostomy (70%), and precolic gastro-jejunal anastomosis (88%). Postoperative complications included biliary fistula (1%), pancreatic fistula (8%), pancreatic stump bleeding (4%), and delayed gastric emptying (13%). The mean operative time decreased after the first 50 cases ( < 0.001) and blood loss after 60 cases ( = 0.046). R1 resections lowered after 25 cases ( = 0.025). Vascular resections (17%) did not influence the rate of complications ( = 0.8). The survival rate at 5 years for pancreatic adenocarcinoma was 32.93%.
CONCLUSIONS
Outcomes improve as surgeon experience increases, with proper training being the most important factor for minimizing the impact of the learning curve over the postoperative complications. Analyzing the learning curve from the perspective of a single surgeon is mandatory for accurate statistical results and interpretation.
PubMed: 38792572
DOI: 10.3390/life14050549 -
Surgical Endoscopy May 2023Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is often associated with significant morbidity and mortality after the Whipple operation. Patient-related factors associated with...
BACKGROUND
Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is often associated with significant morbidity and mortality after the Whipple operation. Patient-related factors associated with POPF include soft pancreatic texture and a small main pancreatic duct (MPD). The traditional duct-to-mucosa anastomosis was modified to be easily performed. The aim of the study was to evaluate the simplified pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) method in the prevention of POPF after minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).
METHODS
Ninety-eight patients who underwent laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) with a simplified PJ procedure containing only two duct-to-mucosa sutures and four penetrating-sutures to anastomose the pancreatic parenchyma and jejunal seromuscular layer in our center were retrospectively studied. Demographics and clinical short-term safety were assessed.
RESULTS
All LPD and RPD procedures were successfully performed. The median time of PJ was 17 min, and the median blood loss was 60 mL, with only one patient requiring transfusion. Four patients (4.1%) suffered from clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF), including four grade B cases and no grade C cases. For patients with an MPD diameter of 3 mm or less, POPF was noted in two (4%) of the fifty patients, with all cases being grade B. Of the patients with a soft pancreas, only two (4.5%) patients suffered from grade B POPF. One patient (1.0%) experienced a 90-day mortality. Neither the main pancreatic diameter nor pancreatic texture had an impact on postoperative outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
Our technique is a simple, safe and efficient alternative to prevent POPF after LPD and RPD. This method is suitable for almost all pancreatic conditions, including cases with a small main pancreatic duct and soft pancreas, and has the potential to become the preferred procedure in low-volume pancreatic surgery centers. Our modified duct-to-mucosa PJ, which contains only two duct-to-mucosa sutures and four penetrating-sutures to anastomose the pancreatic parenchyma and jejunal seromuscular layer, is ideal for small MPD and soft pancreas when performing minimally invasive PD and has a low rate of POPF. PJ pancreaticojejunostomy, MPD main pancreatic diameter, PD pancreaticoduodenectomy, POPF postoperative pancreatic fistula.
Topics: Humans; Pancreaticojejunostomy; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Pancreatic Fistula; Retrospective Studies; Pancreas; Pancreatic Ducts; Anastomosis, Surgical; Postoperative Complications; Mucous Membrane
PubMed: 36624217
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09830-6 -
Journal of Inflammation Research 2023Necrotizing pancreatitis (NP) complicated by gastrointestinal fistula is challenging and understudied. As the treatment of necrotizing pancreatitis changed to a step-up...
PURPOSE
Necrotizing pancreatitis (NP) complicated by gastrointestinal fistula is challenging and understudied. As the treatment of necrotizing pancreatitis changed to a step-up strategy, we attempted to evaluate the incidence, risk factors, clinical outcomes and treatment of gastrointestinal fistulas in patients receiving a step-up approach.
METHODS
Clinical data from 1274 patients with NP from 2014-2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify risk factors and propensity score matching (PSM) to explore clinical outcomes in patients with gastrointestinal fistulas.
RESULTS
Gastrointestinal fistulas occurred in 8.01% (102/1274) of patients. Of these, 10 were gastric fistulas, 52 were duodenal fistulas, 14 were jejunal or ileal fistulas and 41 were colonic fistulas. Low albumin on admission (OR, 0.936), higher CTSI (OR, 1.143) and invasive intervention prior to diagnosis of gastrointestinal fistula (OR, 5.84) were independent risk factors for the occurrence of gastrointestinal fistula, and early enteral nutrition (OR, 0.191) was a protective factor. Patients who developed a gastrointestinal fistula were in a worse condition on admission and had a poorer clinical outcome (p<0.05). After PSM, both groups of patients had similar baseline information and clinical characteristics at admission. The development of gastrointestinal fistulas resulted in new-onset persistent organ failure, increased open surgery, prolonged parenteral nutrition and hospitalization, but not increased mortality. The majority of patients received only conservative treatment and minimally invasive interventions, with 7 patients (11.3%) receiving surgery for upper gastrointestinal fistulas and 11 patients (26.9%) for colonic fistulas.
CONCLUSION
Gastrointestinal fistulas occurred in 8.01% of NP patients. Independent risk factors were low albumin, high CTSI and early intervention, while early enteral nutrition was a protective factor. After PSM, gastrointestinal fistulas resulted in an increased proportion of NP patients receiving open surgery and prolonged hospitalization. The majority of patients with gastrointestinal fistulas treated with step-up therapy could avoid surgery.
PubMed: 38026251
DOI: 10.2147/JIR.S433682 -
International Journal of Surgery Case... May 2022Bouveret syndrome is a rare condition characterised by gastric outlet obstruction secondary to a gallstone fistulating into the proximal duodenum or pylorus. Although...
INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE
Bouveret syndrome is a rare condition characterised by gastric outlet obstruction secondary to a gallstone fistulating into the proximal duodenum or pylorus. Although rare, this condition carries a high mortality rate and no current standardised guidelines for management.
CASE PRESENTATION
We present a case of a patient in their 60s with recurrent small bowel obstruction secondary to a cholecysto-duodenal fistula and large gallstone which became impacted in the fourth part of the duodenum. The patient had a P-POSSUM Score of 14% mortality and 60% morbidity risk, had multiple co-morbidities, was bedbound, BMI 59 and had been deemed high risk for general anaesthetic at oncology centre for a 10 × 10 cm likely gynaecological malignancy a month prior to this admission.
CLINICAL DISCUSSION
In contrast to existing literature, endoscopic lithotripsy was considered but not attempted due to unavailability of this service locally. Surgical intervention was decided based on radiological features of impending duodenal perforation on CT imaging and multiple disciplinary team discussion. The patient was managed with open enterolithotomy at the duodeno-jejunal (DJ) flexure and discharged 3 weeks post-operatively at her pre-operative baseline.
CONCLUSION
This is the first report to our knowledge to describe successful surgical management of a gallstone impacted in the fourth part of the duodenum. In cases where anatomical location of impaction precludes retrieval via simple gastrostomy, we suggest using high pressure flush to mobilise the stone to more favourable location distally. We emphasise that stone size should be considered when planning surgical management.
PubMed: 35658279
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.107084 -
The American Journal of Case Reports Sep 2023BACKGROUND Fistulas involving the stomach and duodenum in Crohn's disease are rare (occurring in less than 1% of patients). Here, we reviewed registers from 855 patients... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND Fistulas involving the stomach and duodenum in Crohn's disease are rare (occurring in less than 1% of patients). Here, we reviewed registers from 855 patients with Crohn's disease treated in our service from January 2007 to December 2020 and found 4 cases of duodenal fistula and 1 case of gastric fistula. CASE REPORT The fistula origin was in the ileocolic segment in all cases, and all of the patients underwent preoperative optimization with improvement of nutritional status and infection control. They then underwent surgical treatment with resection of the affected segment and duodenal or gastric closure with covering by an omental patch. One case of a duodenal fistula was complicated by duodenal dehiscence. This was treated surgically with duodenojejunostomy. Each of the other patients had an uneventful postoperative course. All patients were successfully cured of their gastroduodenal fistulas, and at the time of this publication, none of them died or had fistula recurrence. CONCLUSIONS Fistulas with the involvement of the stomach and duodenum in patients with Crohn's disease are almost always due to inflammation in the ileum, colon, or previous ileocolic anastomosis. Management of this situation is complex and often requires clinical and surgical assistance; preoperative optimization of the patient's general condition can improve the surgical results. The surgical approach is based on resection of the affected segment and gastric or duodenal closure with covering by an omental patch. Gastrojejunostomy or duodenojejunostomy can be performed in selected patients with larger defects and minor jejunal disease. To prevent recurrence, prophylactic therapy with anti-TNF agents and early endoscopic surveillance are also essential for successful treatment.
Topics: Humans; Crohn Disease; Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors; Stomach; Intestinal Fistula; Duodenum
PubMed: 37661602
DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.940644 -
The Korean Journal of Thoracic and... Aug 2020Esophageal fistulas may occur in an advanced stage or as a potentially life-threatening complication of treatment. They can be divided into esophageal-respiratory and...
Esophageal fistulas may occur in an advanced stage or as a potentially life-threatening complication of treatment. They can be divided into esophageal-respiratory and esophageal-aorta fistulas. The diagnosis is confirmed with fluoroscopy using dilute barium oral contrast, followed by thin-section computed tomography, which defines the precise location and extent of the fistula. Flexible esophagoscopy and bronchoscopy are required for confirmation and anatomic assessment of the suspected fistula and provide additional information for treatment planning. Contamination is traditionally controlled by surgical exclusion, along with a jejunal feeding tube. Currently, fully covered self-expanding metal stents are the primary treatment option.
PubMed: 32793454
DOI: 10.5090/kjtcs.2020.53.4.211 -
Surgical Case Reports May 2023The pectoralis major musculocutaneous flap (PMMF) is a pedicled flap often used as a reconstruction option in head and neck surgery, especially in cases with poor wound...
BACKGROUND
The pectoralis major musculocutaneous flap (PMMF) is a pedicled flap often used as a reconstruction option in head and neck surgery, especially in cases with poor wound healing. However, applying PMMF after esophageal surgery is uncommon. We report here, the case of a successfully repaired refractory anastomotic fistula (RF) after total esophagectomy, by PMMF.
CASE PRESENTATION
A 73-year-old man had a history of hypopharyngolaryngectomy, cervical esophagectomy, and reconstruction using a free jejunal graft for hypopharyngeal carcinosarcoma at the age of 54. He also received conservative treatment for pharyngo-jejunal anastomotic leakage (AL), then postoperative radiation therapy. This time, he was diagnosed with carcinosarcoma in the upper thoracic esophagus; cT3rN0M0, cStageII, according to the Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer 12th Edition. As a salvage surgery, thoracoscopic total resection of the esophageal remnant and reconstruction using gastric tube via posterior mediastinal route was performed. The distal side of the jejunal graft was cut and re-anastomosed with the top of the gastric tube. An AL was observed on the 6th postoperative day (POD), and after 2 months of conservative treatment was then diagnosed as RF. The 3/4 circumference of the anterior wall of the gastric tube was ruptured for 6 cm in length, and surgical repair using PMMF was performed on POD71. The edge of the defect was exposed and the PMMF (10 × 5 cm) fed by thoracoacromial vessels was prepared. Then, the skin of the flap and the wedge of the leakage were hand sutured via double layers with the skin of the flap facing the intestinal lumen. Although a minor AL was observed on POD19, it healed with conservative treatment. No complications, such as stenosis, reflux, re-leakage, were observed over 3 years of postoperative follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS
The PMMF is a useful option for repairing intractable AL after esophagectomy, especially in cases with large defect, as well as difficulties for microvascular anastomosis due to previous operation, radiation, or wound inflammation.
PubMed: 37212955
DOI: 10.1186/s40792-023-01659-y -
Global Health & Medicine Aug 2022Pancreatic juice can leak not only from the main pancreatic duct but also from unclosed ductal branches appearing on the pancreatic stump. We have developed a suture...
Pancreatic juice can leak not only from the main pancreatic duct but also from unclosed ductal branches appearing on the pancreatic stump. We have developed a suture device consisting of three loops of suture attached to four small-curvature needles with the aim to maximize the area of pancreatic parenchyma to be ligated and reduce the number of punctures made on the pancreas during pancreatic closure or anastomosis. In pancreatojejunostomy, the dorsal wall of the jejunum and then the pancreatic parenchyma are sutured using the four needles. Following duct-to-mucosa anastomosis, the ventral jejunal wall is sutured, and the three threads are finally tied sequentially to complete the reconstruction following the Blumgart method. In distal pancreatectomy, the pancreatic stump is sutured from the dorsal aspect sequentially using the four needles, before or after the pancreatic transection. The three threads are then respectively tied on the ventral surface of the pancreas. This device was used in six pancreatoduodenectomies (including two minimally invasive procedures) and five distal pancreatectomies. A postoperative pancreatic fistula requiring additional drainage or repositioning of abdominal drains developed in two patients. No adverse events associated with this device were encountered. The four-needle three-loop suture device can be an alternative to conventional staplers or sutures for closure and anastomosis of the pancreatic stump.
PubMed: 36119788
DOI: 10.35772/ghm.2022.01044 -
Medicine Jan 2024Our objective was to assess the safety and efficacy of 3 tubes with or without covered esophageal stent placement for the management of gastro-mediastinal or...
Our objective was to assess the safety and efficacy of 3 tubes with or without covered esophageal stent placement for the management of gastro-mediastinal or gastro-pleural fistula. We retrospectively assessed the clinical data of 31 consecutive patients with gastro-mediastinal or gastro-pleural fistula treated by using a noninvasive treatment from February 2013 to July 2022. Patients received 3 tubes (jejunal feeding tube, gastrointestinal drainage tube and abscess drainage tube) with or without esophageal-covered stent placement. All patients received continue abscess drainage and nutritional support after procedure. The tubes and/or esophageal-covered stents were removed after fistula healing. All patients received 3 tubes placement and 11 patients with luminal narrowing received esophageal covered stent placement. Technically success was found in all patients, with no procedure-related death, esophageal rupture or massive hemorrhage. Abscess cavity disappeared in 22 patients, with a clinical success rate of 71.0%. All patients received esophageal stent placement were cured and stents were removed, for a median duration of 1.6 months (interquartile ranges [IQR] 1.4, 3.7). Three patients showed clinical improved, with markedly decreased abscess cavity and markedly shrunk fistula. The median survival was 30.8 months. The 1-, 3-, 5-year survival rates were 71.1%, 46.1% and 39.5%, respectively. A noninvasive treatment of 3 tubes with or without covered esophageal stent placement is safe and effective for gastro-mediastinal or gastro-pleural fistula after esophagogastrectomy.
Topics: Humans; Abscess; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Stomach; Gastric Fistula; Pleural Diseases; Stents; Esophageal Fistula
PubMed: 38277539
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037075