-
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Nov 2022Plastic surgeons commonly use one of three access incisions to place breast implants during vertical augmentation mastopexy, including inframammary, vertical, and...
BACKGROUND
Plastic surgeons commonly use one of three access incisions to place breast implants during vertical augmentation mastopexy, including inframammary, vertical, and periareolar. It is not known whether there is a correlation between capsular contracture and access incision location. The purpose of this study was to investigate in a single-surgeon series the incidence of capsular contracture associated with access incision locations in silicone vertical augmentation mastopexy.
METHODS
Patients undergoing a vertical augmentation mastopexy between 2013 and 2017 were studied retrospectively. All patients underwent a standardized, dual-plane breast augmentation with smooth surface silicone gel implants. Patients were evaluated 1 year postoperatively by the Baker scale.
RESULTS
A total of 322 patients met study criteria. Eighty-four had periareolar access, 86 had vertical access, and 152 had inframammary access. There were no differences in patient age or mean implant size between the groups. The capsular contracture rate of the periareolar group was 5.36 percent; in the vertical access group, 3.48 percent; and in the inframammary access group, 1.64 percent. Capsular contracture rates correlated inversely to the distance to the nipple-areola complex, with the periareolar access rates the highest, the vertical access rates intermediate, and the inframammary access rates the lowest. Inframammary incisions were associated with lower capsular contracture rates than periareolar incisions when performed in conjunction with vertical augmentation mastopexy ( p = 0.043). Vertical access capsular contracture rates were intermediate between periareolar and inframammary groups.
CONCLUSION
Surgeons should take into consideration the capsular contracture rates associated with access incision location when planning or performing vertical augmentation mastopexy.
CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Therapeutic, III.
Topics: Humans; Breast Implantation; Silicone Gels; Breast Implants; Retrospective Studies; Mammaplasty; Nipples; Contracture; Implant Capsular Contracture; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 35994344
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009619 -
Journal of Personalized Medicine May 2024(1) Background: Breast reduction is one of the most frequently performed plastic surgeries in women worldwide. The Wise pattern breast reduction is one of the most...
(1) Background: Breast reduction is one of the most frequently performed plastic surgeries in women worldwide. The Wise pattern breast reduction is one of the most frequent skin designs for this surgery. One key point of the surgery is to preserve a well-vascularized NAC by using different surgical pedicles. This study aims to test and update the anatomical knowledge of breast vascularization, the topographic and anatomical basis of the different surgical vascular pedicles, and the differences between the right and left sides. (2) Methods: A descriptive observational anatomical study was carried out on 15 breasts from 10 cryopreserved body donors. A dissection was performed by quadrants to know the affected arteries' origin in the different patterns. (3) Results: The largest and most frequently dissected internal mammary perforator artery was in the second intercostal space. A total of 44.9% of the dissected perforators are located in the upper inner quadrant, compared to 53.5% in the lower quadrants. (4) Conclusions: The upper inner quadrant alone has the most arterial perforators. In contrast, the sum of the two lower quadrants represents the greatest vascularization of the breast, with a small difference between both.
PubMed: 38793118
DOI: 10.3390/jpm14050536 -
Aesthetic Surgery Journal. Open Forum 2022In this article, the authors describe the 1-stage surgical technique that has been used by the senior author since 1990 for all his primary grade 2 and grade 3...
In this article, the authors describe the 1-stage surgical technique that has been used by the senior author since 1990 for all his primary grade 2 and grade 3 augmentation-mastopexies. The article provides a safe, simple, and reproducible approach to a challenging procedure, one that tends to be the most litigious in aesthetic breast surgery. The key points of this technique are simple preoperative markings; the augmentation is performed with a true submuscular placement of smooth implants; and the mastopexy is performed with an inferior pedicle technique with unlimited skin flap undermining and no limitation of nipple elevation. Seventy-eight consecutive cases of augmentation mastopexy performed since 1999 by a single surgeon (V.S.) using the same technique were reviewed. The age range was 26-62 years old; the range of implant volume was 150-375 cc; and the follow-up time period was from 1 year to 22 years. After an extensive patient case review, the authors enforce true extended submuscular augmentation (TESMA) as a reliable augmentation technique that can be used as the first procedure in any grades 2 and 3 ptosis, 1-stage augmentation-mastopexies including bariatric cases. The authors believe that the split inferior pedicle for the mastopexy in combination with the TESMA is a breakthrough approach that eliminates the second stage for any augmentation mastopexy procedure. No major complications such as nipple necrosis, implant bottoming, malpositioning, or extrusions were observed. It is a safe, simple, and reproducible procedure.
PubMed: 35619670
DOI: 10.1093/asjof/ojac017 -
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.... Oct 2022Necrosis of the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) is a major complication of breast surgery that most commonly results from venous congestion. Several conservative rescue...
UNLABELLED
Necrosis of the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) is a major complication of breast surgery that most commonly results from venous congestion. Several conservative rescue therapies have been proposed for relieving NAC congestion, but each carries certain drawbacks, including cost and side effect profile. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of topical dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), an inexpensive compound with vasodilatory, free radical scavenging, and antiinflammatory properties in rescuing congested NACs.
METHODS
We conducted a review of all 15 patients treated with DMSO for NAC congestion at our institution between May 2019 and October 2020. DMSO was applied in liquid form on a soaked gauze pad in the hospital; patients were instructed to apply a DMSO cream to the NAC twice a day following discharge. Patient characteristics and data related to DMSO treatment and NAC healing were compared via univariate analysis.
RESULTS
Eighteen congested NACs from 15 patients who underwent mastectomy, breast reduction, mastopexy, or breast reconstruction were treated with DMSO. Of the 18 treated NACs, 15 healed with DMSO treatment alone. The average length of DMSO treatment was 9.4 ± 8.5 days (mean ± standard deviation); NAC healing took place over 9.9 ± 9.6 days. There were no complications related to DMSO treatment.
CONCLUSIONS
This pilot study shows that DMSO may be an effective topical treatment for NAC congestion following breast surgery. Given its low cost, ease of application, and lack of side effects, future studies should prospectively compare DMSO against other topical treatments, like nitroglycerin ointment.
PubMed: 36320619
DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004595 -
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.... Sep 2019Patients dissatisfied with their breast implants are faced with 2 options: secondary augmentation or removal of the implants. Simple removal of breast implants often...
Patients dissatisfied with their breast implants are faced with 2 options: secondary augmentation or removal of the implants. Simple removal of breast implants often leads to wide, deflated, and laterally displaced breasts which are notoriously difficult to reconstruct. We present a surgical technique that was specifically developed to recreate the breast mound using the wide laterally displaced breast tissue left after breast implant removal.
PubMed: 31741816
DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002429 -
BMJ Open Jun 2021Therapeutic mammaplasty (TM) is an oncological procedure which combines tumour resection with breast reduction and mastopexy techniques. Previous systematic reviews have...
INTRODUCTION
Therapeutic mammaplasty (TM) is an oncological procedure which combines tumour resection with breast reduction and mastopexy techniques. Previous systematic reviews have demonstrated oncological safety of TM, but poor and inconsistent reporting of quality-of-life, aesthetic and functional outcomes, often with non-validated measurement tools. Moreover, there is a paucity of patient-reported outcome measures. Standardisation of outcome reporting is required to enable study results to be compared and combined, for example, through core outcome set (COS) development. This systematic review aims to comprehensively describe the outcomes reported in clinical studies of TM, their respective outcome measures and the time points at which they were evaluated. The overall objective is to facilitate the development of a COS for TM.
METHODS AND ANALYSIS
A systematic review of clinical studies evaluating outcomes following TM will be completed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The following electronic databases have been searched from inception to 5 August 2020: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science. Primary outcomes will include the number of reported outcomes of various types (clinical, aesthetic, functional, quality-of-life and cost-effectiveness), whether these are patient-reported or clinician-reported, how outcomes are defined and the outcome measurement tool(s) used. The time point(s) at which outcomes were measured will be a secondary outcome. No studies will be excluded on the basis of methodological quality in order to generate a comprehensive list of reported outcomes and outcome measures; hence, risk of bias assessment is not required. The data will be described narratively. This protocol has been reported in line with PRISMA-Protocols.
ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION
This study does not involve human or animal participants, hence ethical approval is not required. The findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant conferences.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42020200365.
Topics: Female; Humans; Mammaplasty; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Quality of Life; Research Design; Systematic Reviews as Topic
PubMed: 34135045
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046438 -
Aesthetic Surgery Journal. Open Forum 2022The authors describe their technique for vertical scar mastopexy with a centrally based auto-augmentation flap. Since 2011, the authors have performed this procedure in...
The authors describe their technique for vertical scar mastopexy with a centrally based auto-augmentation flap. Since 2011, the authors have performed this procedure in 212 patients and found that this operative technique has allowed us to achieve reproducible aesthetic outcomes while minimizing complications. Vertical scar mastopexy with a centrally based auto-augmentation flap is an excellent procedure for patients with breast ptosis who desire improved breast shape and superior pole fullness without the use of a breast implant. The perioperative management and detailed steps of the procedure are outlined.
PubMed: 36072010
DOI: 10.1093/asjof/ojac062 -
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.... Dec 2023Evaluation of practice patterns by American Board of Plastic Surgery (ABPS) diplomates allows for a greater understanding as to how the field is progressing....
BACKGROUND
Evaluation of practice patterns by American Board of Plastic Surgery (ABPS) diplomates allows for a greater understanding as to how the field is progressing. Understanding evolving procedural trends can give insight into plastic surgeons' subspecialty focus and influence resident training to prepare them for future practice.
METHODS
American Society of Plastic Surgeons member only projections for aesthetic and reconstructive procedures were reviewed from 1999 to 2018 in 5-year increments to identify shifts in frequency between the beginning (1999-2003) and end (2014-2018) of the timeframe. Tracer utilization for all four ABPS modules were also examined between 2014 and 2018. Descriptive statistics were performed to identify significant changes ( < 0.05) in subspecialty focus and procedure trends.
RESULTS
Annual procedure incidence between 2014 and 2018 was compared with that between 1999 and 2003. The annual number of procedures more than doubled from 3,244,084 to 6,628,082. Among reconstructive procedures, there was a statistically significant increase in the number of breast reconstruction, breast implant removal, and maxillofacial surgery procedures, and a statistically significant decrease in the number of procedures focused on reconstruction of birth defects, burn injuries, and hand anomalies. In aesthetic surgery, significant increases were seen in the number of augmentation mammoplasty, abdominoplasty, and mastopexy procedures, with significant decreases in the number of blepharoplasty and rhinoplasty procedures.
CONCLUSIONS
Understanding the changing practice patterns of ABPS diplomates is essential to define the direction that our specialty is taking over time, and to guide program directors in plastic surgery on areas of focus for appropriate training of plastic surgeons.
PubMed: 38145152
DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005486 -
The Journal of International Medical... Jan 2024Treatment of multiple benign breast nodules is sometimes challenging with respect to establishing a surgical plan that achieves both therapeutic and cosmetic goals.... (Review)
Review
Treatment of multiple benign breast nodules is sometimes challenging with respect to establishing a surgical plan that achieves both therapeutic and cosmetic goals. Successful application of oncoplastic techniques has been reported in selected cases of benign breast lesions. In this case report, we present the surgical treatment and outcome of a patient with multiple fibroadenomas in ptotic and voluminous breasts. A combined procedure of extensive glandular resection and reduction mammoplasty using a modified vertical pedicle technique was performed on this patient, who desired complete lesion removal, volume reduction, and mastopexy. The cosmetic result was satisfactory at both the short- and mid-term follow-up. In addition, different techniques applied in the treatment of breast fibroadenoma are herein reviewed and discussed.
Topics: Humans; Female; Fibroadenoma; Mammaplasty; Breast; Blepharoptosis; Breast Neoplasms
PubMed: 38258790
DOI: 10.1177/03000605231223026 -
Plastic Surgery (Oakville, Ont.) May 2021Purpose of this article is to demonstrate a way of avoiding the waterfall deformity in augmentation mastopexy patients. We will show a case series of results and explain...
Purpose of this article is to demonstrate a way of avoiding the waterfall deformity in augmentation mastopexy patients. We will show a case series of results and explain how this technique gives satisfying aesthetic results for patients seeking breast augmentation who also require mastopexy. We will show how addressing the breast parenchyma on the lower pole via direct excision can give reliable results and avoids the waterfall deformity. The surgical technique used by the senior author combines the principles of breast augmentation, mastopexy, and breast reduction. We apply these principles during the initial single operation. Our goal is to achieve the best anatomical results for the patient. We describe 1538 consecutive patients whom underwent single-stage breast augmentation with mastopexy. All implants were submuscular with 12% being saline and 88% were silicone implants. Vertical mastopexies were performed in 8% and wise pattern incisions were used in 92%. There were no life-threatening complications such as deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and so on. Tissue-related complications included wound infection (1%) and hematomas (1%). Implant-related complications included malposition or implant displacement 9% and capsular contracture 1%. Aesthetic complications included dystopia of NAC (4%) and volume asymmetries (10%). Revision surgery was tissue related (2%), implant related (3%), and aesthetic related (10%). There were no cases of waterfall deformity seen in the cohort. In conclusion, we believe that the technique detailed here is easy to do, uses principles already known of breast augmentation and reduction and gives consistent results with low reoperation rates.
PubMed: 34026673
DOI: 10.1177/2292550320933662