-
Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and... Aug 2022Serotonin syndrome, malignant hyperthermia, and neuroleptic malignant syndrome are life-threatening conditions with similar clinical presentations, all of which may...
Serotonin syndrome, malignant hyperthermia, and neuroleptic malignant syndrome are life-threatening conditions with similar clinical presentations, all of which may occur in post-operative patients. The rarity of these conditions has limited their research as well as the ability to recognise and treat them effectively. We present the case of a 61-year-old male who developed altered mental status, respiratory distress, fever, and haemodynamic instability following post-operative administration of tramadol and meperidine. The differential diagnosis process and process of elimination were used to diagnose this patient with serotonin syndrome. Chart review was used to review the details of the case to write this report. Serotonin syndrome was eventually diagnosed in the context of the symptoms following the administration of 2 serotonergic agents. The patient's symptoms improved with supportive care and did not recur. This case is one of the first published reports of serotonin syndrome resulting from an interaction between tramadol and meperidine, highlighting the importance of constant vigilance in the perioperative period when serotonergic agents are involved. The increased usage of serotonergic antidepressants and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols calling for serotonergic analgesics represent a significant and underrecognised potential for serotonergic multidrug interactions to occur.
PubMed: 35979980
DOI: 10.5152/TJAR.2022.21355 -
Clinical Medicine & Research Aug 2022Our study objective was to assess if multi-modal analgesia with meperidine-ketorolac combination provides superior analgesia or reduces opioid requirement following...
BACKGROUND
Our study objective was to assess if multi-modal analgesia with meperidine-ketorolac combination provides superior analgesia or reduces opioid requirement following surgery compared to Meperidine alone.
DESIGN
Double-blind randomized controlled trial.
SETTING
Postoperative pain control in orthopedic ward after spinal anesthesia.
PATIENTS
American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) risk I or II (ASA I/II) patients who had lower limb implant surgery (88) at our center from September 2014 to July 2015.
INTERVENTIONS
Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 1 mg/kg of intravenous (IV) meperidine and 30 mg of IV ketorolac (treatment group) or 1 mg/kg of IV meperidine (control group) post-surgery, administered every hour for the first 6 hours during the first 24 hours post-surgery. In addition, patients received intravenous meperidine on an 'as needed basis' during the first 24 hours of the postoperative period.
MEASUREMENTS
Outcomes were time-to-first analgesia request postoperatively; cumulative opioid dose in first 24 hours post-surgery; frequency of side effects; and patient satisfaction with pain relief using a Likert scale. Numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores hourly for the first 6 hours, then the 8th, 12th, 16th, 18th and 24th hour post-surgery were assessed.
RESULTS
There was a significant delay in time of first request for analgesia (460 min vs 225 min; =0.03) and a reduction in opioid consumption in 24 hours (299 mg vs 325 mg; =0.01) in the meperidine/ketorolac group compared with the meperidine alone group which were both statistically significant. Patient satisfaction with pain relief was better in the treatment group (=0.01). Additionally, there were fewer side effects in the treatment group than in the control group but this was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS
Adding ketorolac to meperidine reduced postoperative pain, reduced patient daily opioid requirement, increased patient satisfaction with pain relief, without increasing the frequency of side effects. Therefore, IV ketorolac addition to opioids may be a reasonable option in multimodal analgesic protocol.
PubMed: 35998947
DOI: 10.3121/cmr.2022.1628 -
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) Oct 2023: The purpose of the study was to investigate the role of adrenaline (ADR), noradrenaline (NDR), and cortisol in the pathogenesis of the analgesic potency, duration, and...
: The purpose of the study was to investigate the role of adrenaline (ADR), noradrenaline (NDR), and cortisol in the pathogenesis of the analgesic potency, duration, and epilepsy-like toxic effect of meperidine. : The experimental animals were separated into 11 groups of six rats. In the meperidine (MPD) and metyrosine + meperidine (MMPD) groups, paw pain thresholds were measured before and after the treatment between the first and sixth hours (one hour apart). In addition, ADR and NDR analyses were performed before and after the treatment, between the first and fourth hours (one hour apart). For the epilepsy experiment, caffeine, caffeine + meperidine, and caffeine + meperidine + metyrapone groups were created, and the treatment was applied for 1 day or 7 days. Groups were created in which caffeine was used at both 150 mg/kg and 300 mg/kg. Epileptic seizures were observed in epilepsy groups, latent periods were determined, and serum cortisol levels were measured. : In the MPD group, pain thresholds increased only at the first and second hours compared to pre-treatment, while ADR increased at the third hour, leading to a decrease in pain thresholds. In the MMPD group, the increase in paw pain thresholds at 1 and 6 h was accompanied by a decrease in ADR and NDR. In the caffeine (150 mg/kg) + meperidine group, 1-day treatment did not cause epileptic seizures, while seizures were observed and cortisol levels increased in the group in which treatment continued for 7 days. When cortisol levels were compared between the group in which caffeine (300 mg/kg) + meperidine + metyrapone was used for 7 days and the animals receiving caffeine (300 mg/kg) + metyrapone for 7 days, it was found that cortisol levels decreased and the latent period decreased. : The current study showed that if serum ADR and cortisol levels are kept at normal levels, a longer-lasting and stronger analgesic effect can be achieved with meperidine, and epileptic seizures can be prevented.
Topics: Rats; Animals; Meperidine; Epinephrine; Norepinephrine; Hydrocortisone; Metyrapone; Caffeine; Analgesics; Epilepsy; Seizures
PubMed: 37893510
DOI: 10.3390/medicina59101793 -
The Journal of Clinical Pediatric... Mar 2022This retrospective study compares the efficacy and safety of variable dosing of Midazolam (Mid) with and without Meperidine (Mep) combinations for managing varying...
Retrospective Comparisons of the Efficacy and Safety of Variable dosing of Midazolam with and without Meperidine for Management of Varying Levels of Anxiety of Pediatric Dental Patients: 35 years of Sedation Experience.
PURPOSE
This retrospective study compares the efficacy and safety of variable dosing of Midazolam (Mid) with and without Meperidine (Mep) combinations for managing varying levels of anxiety and uncooperative behavior of young pediatric dental patients over a thirty-five-year period.
STUDY DESIGN
Reviews of the sedation logs of 1,785 sedation visits are compared with emphasis on what dosing proves both safe and effective for differing levels of challenging pediatric behavior. Variable dosing of midazolam with and without meperidine which spanned low-end, mid-range, and upper-end were judged making use of a pragmatic approach which defined sedation success as optimal, adequate, inadequate, or over-dosage. Behavioral and physiologic assessment was included with attention to readily observable analysis of the extent to which need for physical restraint occurred to control interfering behavior. Assessment of arousal levels requiring stimulation along with the frequency of alterations in oxygen de-saturation and adverse reactions were included as indications of safety.
RESULTS
Where Mep was used, success rates were consistently higher; working times were significantly prolonged and greater control was provided to avoid adverse reactions by virtue of reversal capability for both agents.
CONCLUSIONS
Predictability and working time of Midazolam was enhanced by combination with narcotic for all levels of patient anxiety. Dosages of 0.7-1.0 mg/kg Mid combined with 1.0-1.5 mg/kg Mep offers the most effective and safe results to overcome need for restraint for moderate and severe levels of anxiety, respectively.
Topics: Anxiety; Child; Conscious Sedation; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Meperidine; Midazolam; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 35533228
DOI: 10.17796/1053-4625-46.2.11 -
BMJ Open Feb 2022Shivering is a common complication in the postoperative period. The incidence of shivering has been reported to range from 5% to 65% under general anaesthesia and as 33%...
INTRODUCTION
Shivering is a common complication in the postoperative period. The incidence of shivering has been reported to range from 5% to 65% under general anaesthesia and as 33% during epidural anaesthesia. Shivering can increase perioperative risk in patients. Both dexmedetomidine and meperidine are effective agents for the prevention of postanaesthetic shivering. However, few studies have compared the anti-shivering effects of different agents following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). This study aims to compare the effects of dexmedetomidine and meperidine on the incidence of shivering in patients undergoing CABG.
METHODS AND ANALYSIS
A total of 180 patients aged 18-75 years, with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade of II-IV, undergoing elective CABG will be enrolled and randomly assigned to the dexmedetomidine, meperidine and control groups (placebo) in an intended 1:1:1 allocation ratio. The patients will be followed up for 7 days after surgery. The primary outcome is the incidence of shivering within 24 hours postoperatively. The secondary outcomes are the number of remedial drugs used after surgery, the incidence of postoperative hypotension and bradycardia, sedation scores, endotracheal extubation time, intensive care unit length of stay, incidence of postoperative delirium within 7 days after surgery, incidence of postoperative arrhythmias, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, average hospital length of stay and mortality rate 30 days after surgery.
ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION
The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University on 20 January 2021 (YXLL-KY-2021(002)) and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. The results of this study will be presented at national and international scientific meetings and conferences. We plan to publish the data in peer-reviewed international scientific journals.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
NCT04735965.
Topics: Coronary Artery Bypass; Dexmedetomidine; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Meperidine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Shivering
PubMed: 35149565
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053865 -
Croatian Medical Journal Aug 2023To investigate whether IV lidocaine improves emergence, early recovery, and late recovery after general anesthesia in women who undergo breast surgery. (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Effects of an intravenous lidocaine bolus before tracheal extubation on recovery after breast surgery - Lidocaine at the End (LATE) study: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
AIM
To investigate whether IV lidocaine improves emergence, early recovery, and late recovery after general anesthesia in women who undergo breast surgery.
METHODS
Sixty-seven women with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II, scheduled for breast surgery were randomized to receive an IV lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg bolus (n=34) or saline placebo (n=33) before tracheal extubation. Anesthesia was induced with thiopental, vecuronium, and fentanyl, and maintained with sevoflurane~1 MAC and 50% nitrous-oxide in oxygen. No postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) prophylaxis was given. Time to extubation, bucking before extubation, and quality of emergence, as well as early and late recovery (coughing post-extubation, sore throat, PONV, and pain scores) within 24 hours postoperatively were evaluated. Diclofenac and meperidine were used for the treatment of pain and metoclopramide for PONV.
RESULTS
The groups did not significantly differ in demographics, intraoperative data, or PONV risk scores. Extubation was~8 minutes in both groups. Patients who received IV lidocaine had significantly smoother recovery, both statistically and clinically; they had better extubation quality scores (1.5 [1-3] vs 3 [1-5], P<0.001), less bucking before extubation (38% vs 91%, P<0.001), less coughing after extubation (at 1 min 18% vs 42%, P=0.026; and at 24 hours 9% vs 27%, P=0.049), and less sore throat (6% vs 48%, P<0.001). Late PONV decreased (3% vs 24%, P=0.013). There were no differences in pain scores and treatment.
CONCLUSION
In women who underwent breast surgery, IV lidocaine bolus administered just before extubation attenuated bucking, cough and sore throat, and PONV for 24 hours after general anesthesia, without prolonging the emergence.
Topics: Humans; Female; Airway Extubation; Lidocaine; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Pain; Pharyngitis; Breast Neoplasms
PubMed: 37654034
DOI: 10.3325/cmj.2023.64.222 -
Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences Jul 2023Several adjuvants, added to local anesthetics, were suggested to induce an ideal regional block with high-quality analgesia. The purpose of this study was to evaluate... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Several adjuvants, added to local anesthetics, were suggested to induce an ideal regional block with high-quality analgesia. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the particular blocking properties of low-dose bupivacaine in combination with meperidine and fentanyl in spinal anesthesia during Cesarean sections.
METHODS
A randomized, double-blind clinical trial was conducted at Hafez Hospital affiliated with Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (Shiraz, Iran) from February 2015 to February 2016. A total of 120 pregnant women, who underwent spinal anesthesia during elective Cesarean section were enrolled in the study. Based on block-wise randomization, the patients were randomly assigned to three groups, namely "B" group received 2 mL bupivacaine 0.5% (10 mg), "BM" group received 8 mg bupivacaine and 10 mg meperidine, and "BF" group received 8 mg bupivacaine and 15 µg fentanyl intrathecally. The block onset, the duration of analgesia, and the time of discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) were all assessed. Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 21, and P<0.05 were considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
The mean duration of motor blocks in the B group (150 min) were significantly higher than the BM (102 min) and BF (105 min) groups (P<0.0001). In both the BM and BF groups, the duration of sensory and motor blocks was the same. The length of stay in the PACU was significantly longer in the B group (P<0.001) than the BM and BF groups. When meperidine or fentanyl was added to bupivacaine, the duration of the analgesia lengthened (P<0.001).
CONCLUSION
Intrathecal low-dose spinal anesthesia induced by bupivacaine (8 mg) in combination with meperidine and/or fentanyl for Cesarean section increased maternal hemodynamic stability, while ensuring effective anesthetic conditions, extending effective analgesia, and reducing the length of stay in PACU. IRCT2015013119470N14.
Topics: Humans; Female; Pregnancy; Bupivacaine; Cesarean Section; Fentanyl; Anesthesia, Spinal; Analgesia; Meperidine
PubMed: 37456203
DOI: 10.30476/IJMS.2022.95205.2653 -
Medical Science Monitor : International... Oct 2023BACKGROUND Caudal block is widely regarded as the top choice for multimodal analgesia in children undergoing urological surgeries, particularly circumcision. This study... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND Caudal block is widely regarded as the top choice for multimodal analgesia in children undergoing urological surgeries, particularly circumcision. This study investigates the efficacy of caudal block and the necessity of rescue analgesia in circumcision surgeries. MATERIAL AND METHODS A prospective, single-blind study was conducted at Ordu University Training and Research Hospital from December 1, 2022, to July 1, 2023. The study randomly divided ASA class I-II children aged 1-12 years into 3 groups for circumcision surgery. Group C received only caudal block. Group CP received caudal block with 10 mg/kg intravenous paracetamol. Group CM received caudal block with 1 mg/kg intravenous meperidine. In each case, a caudal block was administered using 0.5 ml/kg of 0.125% bupivacaine under ultrasound guidance. The primary outcome of the study was total analgesic consumption; the secondary outcomes were pain scores and time to first analgesic administration. Pain severity was evaluated using FLACC and Wong-Baker scores at 0, 1, 4, and 24 h. RESULTS A total of 120 patients, 40 patients in each group, were included in the study. A significant difference was detected among all 3 groups in the Wong-Baker pain score (24th hour) (P<0.001). The FLACC and Wong-Baker pain scores did not differ significantly in the other time frames. The time of the first rescue analgesia and the total amount of analgesic taken in the first 24 h were the same for both groups (P=0.408 and P=0.238). CONCLUSIONS The addition of paracetamol or meperidine to caudal block does not enhance the quality of analgesia.
Topics: Child; Humans; Male; Acetaminophen; Analgesics; Anesthetics, Local; Bupivacaine; Meperidine; Nerve Block; Pain, Postoperative; Prospective Studies; Single-Blind Method
PubMed: 37904341
DOI: 10.12659/MSM.942557 -
Journal of Ayub Medical College,... 2023Shivering is one of the most common adverse outcomes associated with the administration of spinal anaesthesia, which, when clinically relevant, leads to numerous...
BACKGROUND
Shivering is one of the most common adverse outcomes associated with the administration of spinal anaesthesia, which, when clinically relevant, leads to numerous detrimental effects on the human body. Hence, its management becomes imperative. Meperidine, an opioid analgesic, is the drug of choice for this condition. However, the use of meperidine is controversial, as it carries the devastating adverse effect of respiratory depression. We explored the role of granisetron, a 5HT3 antagonist and a commonly used antiemetic premedication, in minimising the incidence of post-spinal shivering and decreasing the use of meperidine as a rescue drug.
METHODS
Overall, 160 parturient patients, between the ages 18-50, undergoing uncomplicated, elective caesarean section, were enrolled in the study, and randomized into two groups with 80 participants each: Group A received 3ml of normal saline, and Group B was administered 3 mg granisetron,15 minutes before spinal anaesthesia institution. Incidence of clinically relevant shivering (score of 3 or more) was noted, and it was recorded whether meperidine was used or not.
RESULTS
67.5% of participants in Group A, and 32.5% of patients in Group B, experienced clinically relevant shivering, with 62.5% of patients in Group A and 28.75% in Group B warranting the use of meperidine. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of incidence of clinically relevant shivering, and meperidine consumption (p-value <0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Premedication with 3 mg granisetron effectively attenuates the occurrence of post-spinal shivering and, hence, lowers the requirement of meperidine as rescue medication.
Topics: Humans; Pregnancy; Female; Adolescent; Young Adult; Adult; Middle Aged; Meperidine; Granisetron; Shivering; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Cesarean Section; Anesthesia, Spinal
PubMed: 38406929
DOI: 10.55519/JAMC-04-11651 -
Journal of Medicine and Life Jul 2023Postoperative shivering is a common complication that can lead to increased postoperative complications. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of intravenous... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Postoperative shivering is a common complication that can lead to increased postoperative complications. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of intravenous ibuprofen and meperidine in preventing shivering following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A total of 120 patients, aged 20-70 and classified as ASA I-II, were enrolled in this triple-blind clinical trial. The participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: ibuprofen (800mg IV), meperidine (30 mg), or placebo (normal saline 2 ml), administered 30 minutes before the end of surgery. The occurrence of postoperative shivering was assessed and recorded at regular intervals (0, 5, 10, 15, 30, and 60 minutes after surgery). Additionally, postoperative pain levels were measured using a visual analog scale (VAS), sedation levels were evaluated using the Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS), and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was documented. The prevalence and severity of postoperative shivering were not statistically significant between groups. The VAS was significantly lower in the meperidine group than the ibuprofen group throughout the study (p <0.001). The VAS was significantly lower in the ibuprofen group than the placebo group at 0 and 15 minutes after surgery. Although the incidence of nausea was slightly higher in the meperidine group, the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.75). Sedation scores were consistently lower in the ibuprofen group and higher in the meperidine group compared to the other groups (p<0.0001) The meperidine group had a significantly higher sedation score indicative of deep sleepiness (score of 4) than the other groups. Intravenous ibuprofen demonstrated comparable efficacy to meperidine in controlling shivering. Additionally, the incidence of nausea, vomiting, and sleepiness was lower in the intravenous ibuprofen group, suggesting it is a potential alternative to meperidine.
Topics: Humans; Meperidine; Ibuprofen; Shivering; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic; Sleepiness; Anesthesia, General; Nausea
PubMed: 37900063
DOI: 10.25122/jml-2022-0040