-
European Journal of Medical Research Sep 2022Wound pain after surgery for lumbar spine disease may interfere with patients' recovery. Acupuncture is commonly used for pain management, but its efficacy for...
BACKGROUND
Wound pain after surgery for lumbar spine disease may interfere with patients' recovery. Acupuncture is commonly used for pain management, but its efficacy for postoperative pain control is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of acupuncture for adjuvant pain control after surgery for degenerative lumbar spine disease.
METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed the records of consecutive patients who received surgery for degenerative lumbar spine disease at our institution from 2013 to 2014. Surgical procedures included open laminectomy, discectomy, and trans-pedicle screw instrumentation with posterior-lateral fusion. Patients were grouped by pain control methods, including routine analgesia, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), and acupuncture. The routine analgesia group received oral acetaminophen/non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with meperidine as needed for immediate pain control. The PCA group received a basal dose of morphine and subsequent user-demand doses. The acupuncture group received acupuncture every other day after surgery.
RESULTS
Ninety-six patients were included, of whom 37 received acupuncture, 27 received PCA, and 32 received routine analgesics for pain control. Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores in all 3 groups decreased significantly, and to the same degree, from the first postoperative day to the second day. No significant differences were found in VAS scores over the next 6 postoperative days; however, the scores of patients treated with PCA were slightly but still significantly higher (p = 0.026) on postoperative day 4 than scores of patients treated with acupuncture and traditional analgesia, a difference likely due to PCA being discontinued on postoperative day 3. No major complications were noted in the acupuncture group, but 2 patients dropped out because of fear of needle insertion.
CONCLUSIONS
Acupuncture may be as effective as traditional analgesia and PCA for adjuvant pain control after surgery for degenerative lumbar spine disease.
Topics: Acupuncture Therapy; Humans; Lumbar Vertebrae; Pain Management; Pain, Postoperative; Retrospective Studies; Spinal Fusion
PubMed: 36050756
DOI: 10.1186/s40001-022-00797-7 -
Animals : An Open Access Journal From... Dec 2021(1) Objective: To investigate the analgesic effects of intravenous acetaminophen after intravenous administration in dogs presenting for ovariohysterectomy. (2) Methods:...
(1) Objective: To investigate the analgesic effects of intravenous acetaminophen after intravenous administration in dogs presenting for ovariohysterectomy. (2) Methods: 14 ASA I client-owned female entire dogs. In this randomized, blinded, clinical study, dogs were given meperidine and acepromazine intramuscularly before induction of anesthesia with intravenous propofol. Anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane in oxygen. Intravenous acetaminophen 20 mg/kg or 0.9% NaCl was administered postoperatively. Pain assessments were conducted using the Glasgow Pain Scale short form before premedication and at 10, 20, 60, 120, and 180 min post-extubation or until rescue analgesia was given. The pain scores, times, and incidences of rescue analgesia between the groups was compared. Blood was collected before and 2, 5, 10, 20, 40, and 80 min after acetaminophen administration. Acetaminophen plasma concentration was quantified by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. The acetaminophen plasma concentration at the time of each pain score evaluation was subsequently calculated. (3) Results: There was no significant difference in pain scores at 10 min, highest pain scores, or time of rescue analgesia between groups. In each group, 3 dogs (43%) received rescue analgesia within 20 min. (4) Conclusions: Following ovariohysterectomy in dogs, there was no detectable analgesic effect of a 20 mg/kg dosage of intravenous acetaminophen administered at the end of surgery.
PubMed: 34944384
DOI: 10.3390/ani11123609 -
World Journal of Plastic Surgery Mar 2022The importance of using effective postoperative analgesia is widely accepted. Systemic opioids are the gold standard for reducing severe pain after surgery, but the side...
BACKGROUND
The importance of using effective postoperative analgesia is widely accepted. Systemic opioids are the gold standard for reducing severe pain after surgery, but the side effects have limited the use of adequate doses. We aimed to evaluate the effect of adding intravenous acetaminophen and intravenous ibuprofen to fentanyl on patient-controlled analgesia.
METHODS
In this randomized clinical trial study in Ardabil city hospital at 2019, 90 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly divided into three groups. The control group (n=30) received normal saline, the acetaminophen group (n=30) received 1g intravenous acetaminophen, and the ibuprofen group (n=30) received 800 mg intravenous ibuprofen. All patients received a pain control by intravenous pump containing fentanyl (15µ/ml). The drugs were injected intravenously after surgery. Shoulder and abdominal pain scores, sedation rate, nausea and vomiting, satisfaction, and the doses of fentanyl and meperidine were recorded in SPSS software within 24 h after surgery.
RESULTS
The mean abdominal pain scores in ibuprofen (3.02) and acetaminophen (2.89) groups were not significantly different (P=0.719) but were significantly lower than in the control group (5.10) (P<0.001). The severity of shoulder pain, nausea and vomiting, sedation, and fentanyl intake were not significantly different in the ibuprofen and acetaminophen groups but were significantly lower than in the control group.
CONCLUSION
The use of both intravenous acetaminophen and ibuprofen in pain control after surgery can reduce the need for opioid use. Acetaminophen can also be a suitable alternative for postoperative pain control in patients that are unable to use NSAIDs.
PubMed: 35592235
DOI: 10.52547/wjps.11.1.117 -
Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences Nov 2021Post-anesthetic shivering is one of the most common complications after anesthesia. Ketamine has been considered to be an effective treatment for post-anesthetic... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Comparison of Intravenous Ketamine with Intrathecal Meperidine in Prevention of Post-anesthetic Shivering after Spinal Anesthesia for Lower Limb Orthopedic Surgeries: A Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial.
BACKGROUND
Post-anesthetic shivering is one of the most common complications after anesthesia. Ketamine has been considered to be an effective treatment for post-anesthetic shivering, but the evidence for its therapeutic benefit after spinal anesthesia is limited. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of intravenous ketamine with intrathecal meperidine in the prevention of post-anesthetic shivering after spinal anesthesia for lower limb orthopedic surgeries.
METHODS
In a double-blind randomized parallel-group clinical trial, a total of 150 patients scheduled for lower limb orthopedic surgeries under spinal anesthesia were selected and randomly divided into three equally sized groups of intravenous ketamine (0.5 mg/kg), intrathecal meperidine (0.2mg/kg) or intravenous normal saline (as placebo). The intensity of shivering in patients were evaluated during surgery and after transfer into the post anesthesia care unit. Also, changes in patients' drowsiness, nausea, vomiting, pruritus, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and arterial oxygen saturation (SPO2) during surgery and until the end of anesthesia were evaluated.
RESULTS
In all times of evaluation (20, 60, 80, 100 and 120 minutes after onset of spinal anesthesia) patients in control group showed a greater intensity of shivering compared to other groups. However, patients who received intrathecal meperidine experienced significantly lower intensity of post anesthetic shivering (p<0.05). The results showed a significant mean arterial pressure and heart rates differences between the three groups, only on 20 and 60 minutes after initiation of spinal anesthesia. The incidence of nausea, vomiting, and pruritus was not significantly different in all three groups, although all patients who received ketamine experienced drowsiness after surgery (p<0.001).
CONCLUSION
The results of the present study showed that, although both intrathecal meperidine and intravenous ketamine could effectively prevent postoperative shivering after spinal anesthesia in lower limb orthopedic surgeries, intrathecal meperidine was associated with more efficacy benefits and a lower frequency of side effects such as post-anesthesia drowsiness.
Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Anesthesia, Spinal; Anesthetics; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Injections, Spinal; Ketamine; Lower Extremity; Meperidine; Nausea; Orthopedic Procedures; Shivering; Vomiting
PubMed: 35392354
DOI: 10.4314/ejhs.v31i6.16 -
Archives of Iranian Medicine Aug 2021Pain control methods after cesarean section may interfere with infant breast-feeding. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of pethidine on breast feeding of... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Pain control methods after cesarean section may interfere with infant breast-feeding. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of pethidine on breast feeding of infants born via cesarean section with spinal anesthesia.
METHODS
In this randomized double-blind clinical trial, we evaluated 116 infants born via cesarean section in Gerash Amiralmomenin hospital (Southern Iran) in 2017. The subjects were selected through purposive sampling and randomly by permuted block randomization and assigned to intervention and control groups. The test group received 100 mg of pethidine as intravenous infusion and the control group received only routine cares. Infants' breast feeding behavior in both groups was recorded within 48 hours of hospitalization, using the standard tool for rapid assessment of infant feeding behavior, which consists of 4 main components of breastfeeding, including readiness to feed, rooting, latching, and sucking with a score range of 0 to 3 for each component evaluated at 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours postnatally. Data were analyzed using independent t tests and chi-square test.
RESULTS
The highest score of breast-feeding behavior pertained to sucking reflexes in the control group and the lowest score to breast feeding readiness in the pethidine group. Readiness for feeding in the control group (2.09±0.53) was significantly higher than the pethidine group (1.81±0.61) (95% CI: 0.0552, 0.5092 and =0.015). Sucking reflex (95% CI: -0.1461, 0.2208 and =0.687), latching (95% CI: -0.3012, 0.0345 and =0.118) and rooting reflexes (95% CI: -0.1685, 0.2342 and =0.747) were almost equal in the control group (2.54±0.49, 2.52±0.38, 2.5±0.48, respectively) and pethidine groups (2.51±0.43, 2.65±0.45, 2.46±0.53, respectively). The total score of feeding behavior in the control group (9.66±1.04) was higher than that of the pethidine group (9.44 ±.69) (95% CI: -0.2032, 0.6412 and =0.306). There was no significant difference between the infants' feeding frequency (95% CI: -0.269, 1.930 and =0.137) and duration of feeding (95% CI: -3.2067, 0.4597 and =0.14).
CONCLUSION
Evaluation of infants in the first 48 hours after birth showed that those babies whose mothers received pethidine were less willing to start breast-feeding. However, other components of breast-feeding behaviors were similar.
Topics: Anesthesia, Spinal; Breast Feeding; Cesarean Section; Female; Humans; Infant; Meperidine; Mothers; Pregnancy
PubMed: 34488326
DOI: 10.34172/aim.2021.84 -
Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) Jun 2022Cancer-related pain constitutes a dominant reason for admission to emergency services, and a significant patient and healthcare challenge. Evidence points to the rising...
Cancer-related pain constitutes a dominant reason for admission to emergency services, and a significant patient and healthcare challenge. Evidence points to the rising prevalence of opioid misuse in this patient group. We sought to compare drug delivery in an oncology-dedicated emergency department (OED) and a general emergency department (GED) within the same hospital. As such, we obtained patient and drug-related data for OED and GED during a designated three-month period, and compared them using Fisher’s exact test, chi-square tests and the Mann-Whitney test. In total, 584 patients had 922 visits to emergency services (OED n = 479; GED n = 443), and were given 1478 drugs (OED n = 557; GED n = 921). Pain was a prominent chief complaint among visitors to the OED (17%) and GED (21%). Approximately a fifth of all drugs used were analgesics (OED—18.5%; GED—20.4%), however, in the GED, 51.6% (n = 97) were used for non-pain-related admissions, compared with 33.0% (n = 34) in OED. Opioid usage significantly differed between emergency settings. The GED administered three times as many intravenous opioids (p <0.001), a narrower spectrum of oral and intravenous drugs (p = 0.003) and no rapid-acting opioids, significantly fewer pain adjuvants (10.9% versus 18.7%, p < 0.001), and, finally, non-guideline-recommended drugs for pain, such as meperidine and benzodiazepines. Taken together, compared with the GED, the management of cancer-related pain in the OED was more personalized, and characterized by fewer intravenous opioids, enhanced diversity in drug type, route and method of delivery. Efforts should be directed toward reduction of disparities in the treatment of cancer pain in emergency settings.
PubMed: 35890103
DOI: 10.3390/ph15070805 -
Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and... Aug 2023Intrathecal morphine is used as an effective component of multimodal analgesia in postoperative analgesia in cesarean section patients. We aimed to analyze the...
OBJECTIVE
Intrathecal morphine is used as an effective component of multimodal analgesia in postoperative analgesia in cesarean section patients. We aimed to analyze the relationship between intrathecal morphine administration and postdural puncture headache (PDPH), pain score and analgesia consumption in the postoperative period, and maternal fetal effects.
METHODS
One hundred four pregnant women aged ≥18 years (American Society of Anesthesiology physical status I or II, >36 weeks gestation) who were scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia were included in this study. Spinal anesthesia consisted of bupivacaine with or without morphine (Group M: 10 mg heavy marcaine + 25 mcg fentanyl + 100 mcg morphine; Group F: 10 mg heavy marcaine + 25 mcg fentanyl). The effect of intrathecal morphine on PDPH, postoperative pain score, analgesia consumption, and maternal and fetal effects were recorded for 5 days.
RESULTS
PDPH developed in a total of 33 patients (Group M: 18 and Group F: 15, =0.274). When we evaluated PDPH with the VAS, there was no significant difference between the groups. The postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) was lower in the morphine group, and no statistically significant difference was found in the VAS 1 hr and VAS 2 hr, whereas the VAS 6 hr and VAS 24 hr were found to be statistically significant. There was no difference in terms of PDPH, the first analgesic requirement and postoperative nausea-vomiting, but meperidine consumption was lower in the morphine group.
CONCLUSION
Low-dose intrathecal morphine did not affect the incidence of PDPH. It is an effective method that can be used in cesarean section patients without increasing the maternal and fetal side effects from postoperative analgesia.
PubMed: 37587656
DOI: 10.4274/TJAR.2023.221140 -
Pain Research & Management 2022Comparing bupivacaine's adjuvants in spinal anesthesia, we assessed the specific blocking characteristics and adverse effects of bupivacaine alone and in combination... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Analgesic Characteristics of Bupivacaine Alone and in Combination with Dexmedetomidine or Meperidine in Spinal Anesthesia during Cesarean Section: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial Study.
BACKGROUND
Comparing bupivacaine's adjuvants in spinal anesthesia, we assessed the specific blocking characteristics and adverse effects of bupivacaine alone and in combination with dexmedetomidine or meperidine in spinal anesthesia during cesarean section.
METHODS
In this double-blind randomized clinical trial study, ninety pregnant women were divided into groups to receive 10 mg bupivacaine (group B), 10 mg bupivacaine with 5 g dexmedetomidine (group BD), or 10 mg bupivacaine with 10 mg meperidine (group BM) intrathecal. Patients were assessed for the quality of analgesia during operations. Durations of sensory and motor blocks and anesthesia-related complications were analyzed using SPSS 21, and values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
The onset of sensory and motor blocks was essentially the same in all treated groups. Block regression time was significantly prolonged in the BD group compared to the B and BM groups ( < 0.001). The duration of analgesia was significantly longer in the BD and BM groups than in the B group ( < 0.001). The level of sedation in the BD group was higher than in the B group. Shivering occurred in 40% of patients in the B group, which was significantly more than that of the BD (16.6%) and BM (33.3%) groups. Itching happened in 33.3% of women in the BM group which was statistically more than that of the B (3.33%) and BD (0) groups. The incidence of adverse effects was the same in all groups.
CONCLUSION
The combination of bupivacaine with dexmedetomidine significantly prolonged sensory and motor regression time and duration of analgesia.
Topics: Analgesics; Anesthesia, Spinal; Anesthetics, Local; Bupivacaine; Cesarean Section; Dexmedetomidine; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Injections, Spinal; Meperidine; Pain; Pregnancy
PubMed: 35899020
DOI: 10.1155/2022/5111214 -
BMC Anesthesiology Oct 2019Hypothermia and shivering are common complications after spinal anaesthesia, especially after uroscopic procedures in which large amounts of cold intraluminal irrigation... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial
Comparative study between intrathecal dexmedetomidine and intrathecal magnesium sulfate for the prevention of post-spinal anaesthesia shivering in uroscopic surgery; (RCT).
BACKGROUND
Hypothermia and shivering are common complications after spinal anaesthesia, especially after uroscopic procedures in which large amounts of cold intraluminal irrigation fluids are used. Magnesium sulfate and dexmedetomidine are the most effective adjuvants with the least side effects. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of intrathecal dexmedetomidine versus intrathecal magnesium sulfate on the prevention of post-spinal anaesthesia shivering.
METHODS
This prospective randomized, double-blinded controlled study included 105 patients who were scheduled for uroscopic surgery at the Kasr El-Aini Hospital. The patients were randomly allocated into three groups. Group C (n = 35) received 2.5 ml of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (12.5 mg) + 0.5 ml of normal saline, Group M (n = 35) received 2.5 ml of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (12.5 mg) + 25 mg of magnesium sulfate in 0.5 ml saline, and Group D (n = 35) received 2.5 ml of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (12.5 mg) + 5 μg of dexmedetomidine in 0.5 ml saline. The primary outcomes were the incidence and intensity of shivering. The secondary outcomes were the incidence of hypothermia, sedation, the use of meperidine to control shivering and complications.
RESULTS
Group C had significantly higher proportions of patients who developed shivering (21), developed grade IV shivering (20) and required meperidine (21) to treat shivering than group M (8,5,5) and group D (5,3,6), which were comparable to each other. The time between block administration and meperidine administration was similar among the three groups. Hypothermia did not occur in any of the patients. The three groups were comparable regarding the occurrence of nausea, vomiting, bradycardia and hypotension. All the patients in group C, 32 patients in group M and 33 patients in group D had a sedation score of 2. Three patients in group M and 2 patients in group D had a sedation score of 3.
CONCLUSIONS
Intrathecal injections of both dexmedetomidine and magnesium sulfate were effective in reducing the incidence of post-spinal anaesthesia shivering. Therefore, we encourage the use of magnesium sulfate, as it is more physiologically available, more readily available in most operating theatres and much less expensive than dexmedetomidine.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Clinical trial registration ID: Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (PACTR) Trial Number PACTR201801003001727 ; January 2018, "retrospectively registered".
Topics: Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Agonists; Adult; Anesthesia, Spinal; Anesthetics; Anesthetics, Local; Bupivacaine; Dexmedetomidine; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Hypothermia; Injections, Spinal; Magnesium Sulfate; Male; Meperidine; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Shivering; Urologic Surgical Procedures
PubMed: 31651246
DOI: 10.1186/s12871-019-0853-0 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Jun 2023Sedation techniques in interventional flexible bronchoscopy and endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial-needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) are inconsistent and the...
Sedation techniques in interventional flexible bronchoscopy and endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial-needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) are inconsistent and the evidence for required general anesthesia under full anesthesiologic involvement is scarce. Moreover, we faced the challenge of providing bronchoscopic care with limited personnel. Hence, we retrospectively identified 513 patients that underwent flexible interventional bronchoscopy and/or EBUS-TBNA out of our institution between January 2020 and August 2022 to evaluate our deep analgosedation approach based on pethidine/meperidine bolus plus continuous flow adjusted propofol, the bronchoscopist-directed continuous flow propofol based analgosedation (BDcfP) in a two-personnel setting. Consequently, 502 out of 513 patients received BDcfP for analgosedation. We identified cardiovascular comorbidities, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and arterial hypertension as risk factors for periprocedural hypotension. Propofol flow rate did not correlate with hypotension. Theodrenaline and cafedrine might be used to treat periprocedural hypotension. Moreover, midazolam might be used to support the sedative effect. In conclusion, BDcfP is a safe and feasible sedative approach during interventional flexible bronchoscopy and EBUS-TBNA. In general, after the implementation of safety measures, EBUS-TBNA and interventional flexible bronchoscopy via BDcfP might safely be performed even with limited personnel.
PubMed: 37445256
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12134223