-
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology... Aug 2023Prolactinomas are the most common pituitary tumor histotype, with microprolactinomas being prevalent in women and macroprolactinomas in men. Hyperprolactinemia is among... (Review)
Review
Prolactinomas are the most common pituitary tumor histotype, with microprolactinomas being prevalent in women and macroprolactinomas in men. Hyperprolactinemia is among the most common causes of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism in both sexes, prompting medical advice for hypogonadism (infertility, oligo-amenorrhea, impotence, osteoporosis/osteopenia) in both sexes, and for signs and symptoms of mass effects (hypopituitarism, visual loss, optic chiasm compression, cranial nerve deficits, headaches) predominantly in men. Diagnostic workup involves a single prolactin measurement and pituitary imaging, but some laboratory artifacts (ie, the "hook effect" and macroprolactin) can complicate or delay the diagnosis. The treatment of choice for prolactinomas is represented by dopamine agonists, mainly cabergoline, which are able to induce disease control, restore fertility in both sexes, and definitively cure one-third of patients, thus permitting treatment discontinuation. Pregnancy and menopause may promote spontaneous prolactin decline and anticipate cabergoline discontinuation in women. Surgery and/or radiotherapy are indicated in case of resistance to cabergoline not overcome by the increase in drug dose up to the maximally tolerated or the patient's personal choice of surgery. The evidence of resistance to cabergoline in invasive and proliferative tumors may indicate biological aggressiveness, thus requiring alternative therapeutic approaches mainly based on temozolomide use as monotherapy or combined with radiotherapy. In uncontrolled patients, new medical approaches (alternative hormonal treatments, cytotoxic drugs, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, mTOR/Akt inhibitors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, or immunotherapy) may be offered but the experience collected to date is still very scant. This article reviews different facets of prolactinomas and discusses approaches to the condition in more common clinical situations.
Topics: Male; Pregnancy; Humans; Female; Prolactinoma; Cabergoline; Prolactin; Ergolines; Pituitary Neoplasms; Dopamine Agonists; Hypogonadism
PubMed: 36974474
DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgad174 -
Current Opinion in Ophthalmology Sep 2019Optic pathway gliomas are low-grade neoplasms that affect the precortical visual pathway of children and adolescents. They can affect the optic nerve, optic chiasm,... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
Optic pathway gliomas are low-grade neoplasms that affect the precortical visual pathway of children and adolescents. They can affect the optic nerve, optic chiasm, optic tracts and radiations and can either be sporadic or associated with neurofibromatosis type one. Gliomas isolated to the optic nerve (ONG) represent a subgroup of optic pathway gliomas, and their treatment remains controversial. New developments in ONG treatment have emerged in recent years, and it is necessary for clinicians to have a current understanding of available therapies.
RECENT FINDINGS
The current review of the literature covers the background of and recent developments in ONG treatment, with a focus on standard chemotherapy, new molecularly targeted therapies, radiation therapy and surgical resection and debulking.
SUMMARY
Although standard chemotherapy remains the mainstay of ONG treatment, newer molecularly targeted therapies such as mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase inhibitors and bevacizumab represent a promising new treatment modality, and clinical studies are ongoing.
Topics: Adolescent; Antineoplastic Agents; Child; Female; Humans; Male; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures; Optic Chiasm; Optic Nerve Glioma; Optic Nerve Neoplasms; Optic Tract; Radiotherapy
PubMed: 31246635
DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000587 -
International Journal of Radiation... May 2021Dosimetric and clinical predictors of radiation-induced optic nerve/chiasm neuropathy (RION) after single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or hypofractionated... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Dosimetric and clinical predictors of radiation-induced optic nerve/chiasm neuropathy (RION) after single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or hypofractionated (2-5 fractions) radiosurgery (fSRS) were analyzed from pooled data that were extracted from published reports (PubMed indexed from 1990 to June 2015). This study was undertaken as part of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Working Group on Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy, investigating normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) after hypofractionated radiation.
METHODS AND MATERIALS
Eligible studies described dose delivered to optic nerve/chiasm and provided crude or actuarial toxicity risks, with visual endpoints (ie, loss of visual acuity, alterations in visual fields, and/or blindness/complete vision loss). Studies of patients with optic nerve sheath tumors, optic nerve gliomas, or ocular/uveal melanoma were excluded to obviate direct tumor effects on visual outcomes, as were studies not specifying causes of vision loss (ie, tumor progression vs RION).
RESULTS
Thirty-four studies (1578 patients) were analyzed. Histologies included pituitary adenoma, cavernous sinus meningioma, craniopharyngioma, and malignant skull base tumors. Prior resection (76% of patients) did not correlate with RION risk (P = .66). Prior irradiation (6% of patients) was associated with a crude 10-fold increased RION risk versus no prior radiation therapy. In patients with no prior radiation therapy receiving SRS/fSRS in 1-5 fractions, optic apparatus maximum point doses resulting in <1% RION risks include 12 Gy in 1 fraction (which is greater than our recommendation of 10 Gy in 1 fraction), 20 Gy in 3 fractions, and 25 Gy in 5 fractions. Omitting multi-fraction data (and thereby eliminating uncertainties associated with dose conversions), a single-fraction dose of 10 Gy was associated with a 1% RION risk. Insufficient details precluded modeling of NTCP risks after prior radiation therapy.
CONCLUSIONS
Optic apparatus NTCP and tolerance doses after single- and multi-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery are presented. Additional standardized dosimetric and toxicity reporting is needed to facilitate future pooled analyses and better define RION NTCP after SRS/fSRS.
Topics: Adenoma; Blindness; Cavernous Sinus; Craniopharyngioma; Humans; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Meningeal Neoplasms; Meningioma; Models, Biological; Models, Theoretical; Optic Chiasm; Optic Nerve; Organs at Risk; Pituitary Neoplasms; Radiation Dose Hypofractionation; Radiation Tolerance; Radiosurgery; Radiotherapy Dosage; Re-Irradiation; Skull Base Neoplasms; Visual Acuity; Visual Fields
PubMed: 29534899
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.01.053 -
Pituitary Aug 2019Non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) are associated with impaired well-being, increased comorbidities, and reduced long-term survival. Data on optimal management... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) are associated with impaired well-being, increased comorbidities, and reduced long-term survival. Data on optimal management of NFPAs around surgical treatment are scarce, and postoperative treatment and follow-up strategies have not been evaluated in prospective trials. Here, we review the preoperative, perioperative, and early postoperative management of patients with NFPAs.
METHODS
We searched Medline and the Cochrane Library for articles published in English with the following items "Pituitary neoplasms AND Surgery" and "Surgery AND Hypopituitarism". Studies containing detailed analyses of the management of NFPAs in adult patients, including pituitary surgery, endocrine care, imaging, ophthalmologic assessment and long-term outcome were reviewed.
RESULTS
Treatment options for NFPAs include active surveillance, surgical resection, and radiotherapy. Pituitary surgery is currently recommended as first-line treatment in patients with visual impairment due to adenomas compressing the optic nerves or chiasma. Radiotherapy is reserved for large tumor remnants or tumor recurrence following one or more surgical attempts. There is no consensus of optimal pre-, peri-, and postoperative management such as timing, frequency, and duration of endocrine, radiologic, and ophthalmologic assessments as well as management of smaller tumor remnants or tumor recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS
In clinical practice, there is a great variation in the treatment and follow-up of patients with NFPAs. We have, based on available data, suggested an optimal management strategy for patients with NFPAs in relation to pituitary surgery. Prospective trials oriented at drawing up strategies for the management of NFPAs are needed.
Topics: Female; Humans; Hypopituitarism; Male; Pituitary Gland; Pituitary Neoplasms; Postoperative Period
PubMed: 31011999
DOI: 10.1007/s11102-019-00960-0