-
Japanese Journal of Radiology Jan 2023A narrative review regarding percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) for osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF) is provided herein, addressing the epidemic of OVF in Japan, the... (Review)
Review
A narrative review regarding percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) for osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF) is provided herein, addressing the epidemic of OVF in Japan, the latest response to the criticism of PVP for OVFs, the indications and potential risks of PVP for OVFs, and a future perspective for PVP. Each year in Japan, approximately 32,000 patients aged 55 years or older suffer from chronic low back pain for several months to several years due to a compression fracture. PVP is one of the surgical treatments for an OVF, and it is less invasive compared to the traditional open surgery. PVP is suitable for OVF patients who have difficulty walking as assessed by the modified Yokoyama's activities of daily living (ADL) scoring system, and for patients with Kummell's disease diagnosed by CT and MRI examinations. Serious adverse events related to PVP occur in 1.1-3.3% of the cases, but direct deaths from PVP are extremely rare at less than 1%. Recent studies demonstrated that OVF patients treated with PVP are less likely to die after the treatment than non-surgically treated patients, which conflicts with the Cochran reviews' conclusion not supporting PVP for OVFs. Novel robotic systems and procedure-support devices are being developed, providing a next step toward fully automated PVP procedures.
Topics: Humans; Vertebroplasty; Activities of Daily Living; Spine; Osteoporotic Fractures; Spinal Fractures; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35943687
DOI: 10.1007/s11604-022-01322-w -
Current Opinion in Endocrinology,... Aug 2021The pathogenesis of bone fragility in diabetes has not been fully characterized. The antifracture efficacy of available therapies remains unproven in patients with... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Review
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
The pathogenesis of bone fragility in diabetes has not been fully characterized. The antifracture efficacy of available therapies remains unproven in patients with diabetes. We aim to collate current evidence of the treatment of diabetic bone fragility, and to provide a rationale for considering optimal therapeutic option in patients with diabetes.
RECENT FINDINGS
The antifracture efficacy of antiresorptive and anabolic therapies is well established in patients without diabetes. Studies in patients with osteoporosis have shown that anabolic therapies lead to faster and larger benefits to bone mineral density and offer greater protection against fracture than antiresorptive therapies. Available data suggest that antiresorptive and anabolic therapies have similar effect on bone density and fracture risk reduction in patients with and without diabetes. However, the evidence in diabetes is limited to observational studies and post hoc analyses of osteoporosis studies.
SUMMARY
There are no specific guidelines for the treatment of bone fragility in patients with diabetes. We offer a rationale for use of anabolic therapies in diabetes which is a low bone formation state, in contrast to postmenopausal osteoporosis that is characterized by increased bone turnover. Prospective studies evaluating the effect of available therapies on bone quality and fracture outcomes in patients with diabetes are needed.
Topics: Anabolic Agents; Bone Density; Bone Density Conservation Agents; Diabetes Complications; Humans; Osteoporosis; Osteoporotic Fractures
PubMed: 34010225
DOI: 10.1097/MED.0000000000000645 -
Osteoporosis International : a Journal... Mar 2021Vertebral fractures are independent risk factors for vertebral and nonvertebral fractures. Since vertebral fractures are often missed, the relatively new introduction of...
Vertebral fractures are independent risk factors for vertebral and nonvertebral fractures. Since vertebral fractures are often missed, the relatively new introduction of vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) for imaging of the lateral spine during DXA-measurement of the spine and hips may contribute to detect vertebral fractures. We advocate performing a VFA in all patients with a recent fracture visiting a fracture liaison service (FLS). Fracture liaison services (FLS) are important service models for delivering secondary fracture prevention for older adults presenting with a fragility fracture. While commonly age, clinical risk factors (including fracture site and number of prior fracture) and BMD play a crucial role in determining fracture risk and indications for treatment with antiosteoporosis medications, prevalent vertebral fractures usually remain undetected. However, vertebral fractures are important independent risk factors for future vertebral and nonvertebral fractures. A development of the DXA technology, vertebral fracture assessment (VFA), allows for assessment of the lateral spine during the regular DXA bone mineral density measurement of the lumbar spine and hips. Recent approaches to the stratification of antiosteoporosis medication type according to baseline fracture risk, and differences by age in the indication for treatment by prior fracture mean that additional information from VFA may influence initiation and type of treatment. Furthermore, knowledge of baseline vertebral fractures allows reliable definition of incident vertebral fracture events during treatment, which may modify the approach to therapy. In this manuscript, we will discuss the epidemiology and clinical significance of vertebral fractures, the different methods of detecting vertebral fractures, and the rationale for, and implications of, use of VFA routinely in FLS. • Vertebral fracture assessment is a tool available on modern DXA instruments and has proven ability to detect vertebral fractures, the majority of which occur without a fall and without the signs and symptoms of an acute fracture. • Most osteoporosis guidelines internationally suggest that treatment with antiosteoporosis medications should be considered for older individuals (e.g., 65 years +) with a recent low trauma fracture without the need for DXA. • Younger individuals postfracture may be risk-assessed on the basis of FRAX® probability including DXA and associated treatment thresholds. • Future fracture risk is markedly influenced by both site, number, severity, and recency of prior fracture; awareness of baseline vertebral fractures facilitates definition of true incident vertebral fracture events occurring during antiosteoporosis treatment. • Detection of previously clinically silent vertebral fractures, defining site of prior fracture, might alter treatment decisions in younger or older FLS patients, consistent with recent IOF-ESCEO guidance on baseline-risk-stratified therapy, and provides a reliable baseline from which to define new, potentially therapy-altering, vertebral fracture events.
Topics: Absorptiometry, Photon; Aged; Bone Density; Humans; Osteoporosis; Osteoporotic Fractures; Spinal Fractures
PubMed: 33475820
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-020-05804-3 -
Endocrine Practice : Official Journal... Sep 2023We evaluated the efficacy of romosozumab in women from FRAME who had no prior fracture but met other criteria for very high fracture risk (VHFR).
OBJECTIVE
We evaluated the efficacy of romosozumab in women from FRAME who had no prior fracture but met other criteria for very high fracture risk (VHFR).
METHODS
In FRAME, postmenopausal women received romosozumab or placebo for 12 months (year 1) followed by denosumab for 12 months (year 2). In this post hoc analysis, we applied the following criteria from the American Association of Clinical Endocrinology to define VHFR: lumbar spine or total hip T-score <-3.0 and/or Fracture Risk Assessment Tool probability of major osteoporotic fracture >30% or hip fracture >4.5% to women with no fracture history at baseline (no fracture-VHFR [NF-VHFR]). Incidence of new vertebral, clinical, and nonvertebral fractures and mean bone mineral density (BMD) percentage change from baseline were assessed at years 1 and 2.
RESULTS
Of the 7180 women in FRAME, 2825 were included in the NF-VHFR subgroup analysis. At year 1, romosozumab versus placebo reduced the incidence of new vertebral fracture (relative risk reduction [RRR]: 76%), clinical fracture (RRR: 60%), and nonvertebral fracture (RRR: 54%) (all P <.05). This fracture reduction was maintained through year 2 in women receiving the romosozumab-to-denosumab sequence versus the placebo-to-denosumab sequence for new vertebral, clinical, and nonvertebral fractures (RRR: 77%, 54%, and 46%, respectively; all P <.05). The mean BMD changes in both treatment groups were similar to those in the overall FRAME population at years 1 and 2.
CONCLUSION
Romosozumab significantly reduced vertebral, clinical, and nonvertebral fracture risk and increased the BMD more than placebo in women at VHFR.
Topics: Female; Humans; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Bone Density; Bone Density Conservation Agents; Denosumab; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal; Osteoporotic Fractures; Postmenopause
PubMed: 37406858
DOI: 10.1016/j.eprac.2023.06.011 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2022Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) suppression therapy is one of the common treatments for most patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). Unfortunately, its... (Review)
Review
Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) suppression therapy is one of the common treatments for most patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). Unfortunately, its detrimental effects on bone health are receiving increasing attention. It may increase the risk of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures. The trabecular bone score (TBS) is a relatively new gray-scale texture measurement parameter that reflects bone microarchitecture and bone strength and has been shown to independently predict fracture risk. We reviewed for the first time the scientific literature on the use of TBS in DTC patients on TSH suppression therapy and aim to analyze and compare the utility of TBS with bone mass strength (BMD) in the management of skeletal health and prediction of fracture risk. We screened a total of seven relevant publications, four of which were for postmenopausal female patients and three for all female patients. Overall, postmenopausal female patients with DTC had lower TBS and a significant reduction in TBS after receiving TSH suppression therapy, but their BMD did not appear to change significantly. In addition, TBS was also found to be an independent predictor of osteoporotic fracture risk in postmenopausal women with DTC receiving TSH suppression therapy. However, due to limitations in the number of studies and study populations, this evidence is not sufficient to fully demonstrate the adverse effects of TSH suppression therapy on patients' TBS or BMD and the efficacy of TBS, and subsequent larger and more case-cohort studies are needed to further investigate the relationship and application of TBS to TSH suppression therapy in terms of skeletal health impairment and fracture risk in DTC patients.
Topics: Humans; Female; Cancellous Bone; Thyrotropin; Absorptiometry, Photon; Bone Density; Osteoporotic Fractures; Thyroid Neoplasms; Adenocarcinoma
PubMed: 36313757
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1004962 -
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and... Apr 2024Half of osteoporotic fractures occur in patients with normal/osteopenic bone density or at intermediate or low estimated risk. Muscle measures have been shown to... (Review)
Review
Half of osteoporotic fractures occur in patients with normal/osteopenic bone density or at intermediate or low estimated risk. Muscle measures have been shown to contribute to fracture risk independently of bone mineral density. The objectives were to review the measurements of muscle health (muscle mass/quantity/quality, strength and function) and their association with incident fragility fractures and to summarize their use in clinical practice. This scoping review follows the PRISMA-ScR guidelines for reporting. Our search strategy covered the three overreaching concepts of 'fragility fractures', 'muscle health assessment' and 'risk'. We retrieved 14 745 references from Medline Ovid SP, EMBASE, Web of Science Core Collection and Google Scholar. We included original and prospective studies on community-dwelling adults aged over 50 years that analysed an association between at least one muscle parameter and incident fragility fractures. We systematically extracted 17 items from each study, including methodology, general characteristics and results. Data were summarized in tables and graphically presented in adjusted forest plots. Sixty-seven articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In total, we studied 60 muscle parameters or indexes and 322 fracture risk ratios over 2.8 million person-years (MPY). The median (interquartile range) sample size was 1642 (921-5756), age 69.2 (63.5-73.6) years, follow-up 10.0 (4.4-12.0) years and number of incident fragility fractures 166 (88-277). A lower muscle mass was positively/not/negatively associated with incident fragility fracture in 28 (2.0), 64 (2.5) and 10 (0.2 MPY) analyses. A lower muscle strength was positively/not/negatively associated with fractures in 53 (1.3), 57 (1.7 MPY) and 0 analyses. A lower muscle function was positively/not/negatively associated in 63 (1.9), 45 (1.0 MPY) and 0 analyses. An in-depth analysis shows how each single muscle parameter was associated with each fragility fractures subtype. This review summarizes markers of muscle health and their association with fragility fractures. Measures of muscle strength and function appeared to perform better for fracture risk prediction. Of these, hand grip strength and gait speed are likely to be the most practical measures for inclusion in clinical practice, as in the evaluation of sarcopenia or in further fracture risk assessment scores. Measures of muscle mass did not appear to predict fragility fractures and might benefit from further research, on D3-creatine dilution test, lean mass indexes and artificial intelligence methods.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Middle Aged; Hand Strength; Prospective Studies; Artificial Intelligence; Risk Factors; Osteoporotic Fractures; Muscle, Skeletal
PubMed: 38284511
DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.13418 -
Osteoporosis International : a Journal... Feb 2023Frailty fractures place a significant socioeconomic burden on the health care system. The Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (SIOT) is proceeding to...
UNLABELLED
Frailty fractures place a significant socioeconomic burden on the health care system. The Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (SIOT) is proceeding to fracture liaison service (FLS) model accreditation in several Italian Fracture Units (FUs), which provides a multidisciplinary approach for the management of the fragility fracture patient.
INTRODUCTION
Osteoporosis and the resulting fragility fractures, particularly femoral fractures, place significant socioeconomic burdens on the health care system globally. In addition, there is a general lack of awareness of osteoporosis, resulting in underestimation of the associated risks and suboptimal treatment of the disease. The fracture liaison service (FLS) represents an exemplary model of post-fracture care that involves a multidisciplinary approach to the frail patient through the collaboration of multiple specialists. The purpose of this article is to highlight the path undertaken by the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (SIOT) for the purpose of certification of numerous FLS centers throughout Italy.
METHODS
SIOT is proceeding with international FLS accreditation in several Italian Fracture Units (FUs), following the creation of a model that provides specific operational and procedural steps for the management of fragility fractures throughout the country. FUs that decide to join the project and implement this model within their facility are then audited by an ACCREDIA-accredited medical certification body.
RESULTS
The drafted FLS model, thanks to the active involvement of a panel of experts appointed by SIOT, outlines a reference operational model that describes a fluid and articulated process that identifies the procedure of identification, description of diagnostic framing, and subsequent initiation of appropriate secondary prevention programs for fractures of individuals who have presented with a recent fragility fracture of the femur.
CONCLUSION
Accreditation of this prevention model will enable many facilities to take advantage of this dedicated diagnostic-therapeutic pathway for the purpose of fracture prevention and reduction of associated health and social costs.
Topics: Humans; Osteoporotic Fractures; Osteoporosis; Delivery of Health Care; Secondary Prevention; Accreditation; Bone Density Conservation Agents
PubMed: 36422656
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-022-06600-x -
European Journal of Clinical... Oct 2023To evaluate the effect of different non-osteoporotic drugs on the increase or decrease in the risk of incident fragility fractures (vertebral, humerus or hip) in a...
PURPOSE
To evaluate the effect of different non-osteoporotic drugs on the increase or decrease in the risk of incident fragility fractures (vertebral, humerus or hip) in a cohort of patients diagnosed with osteoporosis on active anti-osteoporotic therapy.
METHODS
For this retrospective longitudinal study, baseline and follow-up data on prescribed non-osteoporotic treatments and the occurrence of vertebral, humerus or hip fractures in 993 patients from the OSTEOMED registry were analyzed using logistic regression models. The drugs evaluated with a possible beneficial effect were thiazides and statins, while the drugs evaluated with a possible harmful effect were antiandrogens, aromatase inhibitors, proton pump inhibitors, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, benzodiazepines, GnRH agonists, thyroid hormones, and oral and inhaled corticosteroids.
RESULTS
Logistic regression analyses indicated that no treatment significantly improved fracture risk, with the only treatments that significantly worsened fracture risk being letrozole (OR = 0.18, p-value = 0.03) and oral corticosteroids at doses ≤ 5 mg/day (OR = 0.16, p-value = 0.03) and > 5 mg/day (OR = 0.27, p-value = 0.04).
CONCLUSION
The potential beneficial or detrimental effects of the different drugs evaluated on fracture risk are masked by treatment with anabolic or antiresorptive drugs that have a more potent action on bone metabolism, with two exceptions: letrozole and oral corticosteroids. These findings may have important clinical implications, as patients receiving these treatments are not fully protected by bisphosphonates, which may imply the need for more potent anti-osteoporotic drugs such as denosumab or teriparatide.
Topics: Humans; Osteoporotic Fractures; Retrospective Studies; Longitudinal Studies; Letrozole; Osteoporosis; Bone Density Conservation Agents
PubMed: 37515605
DOI: 10.1007/s00228-023-03544-x -
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research :... Aug 2022New therapies may help to prevent osteoporotic fractures other than through increasing bone mineral density (BMD). Because fracture risk has an important genetic...
New therapies may help to prevent osteoporotic fractures other than through increasing bone mineral density (BMD). Because fracture risk has an important genetic component, we aim to identify loci increasing fracture risk that do not decrease BMD, using a recently-proposed structural equation model adapted to remove genetic influences of BMD on fracture risk. We used summary statistics of the largest genome-wide association studies (GWASs) for BMD and for fracture in these analyses. We next estimated the genetic correlation between the non-BMD or BMD-related genetic effects and other clinical risk factors for fracture. Last, based on white British participants in the UK Biobank, we conducted genetic risk score analyses to assess whether the aggregated genetic effects conferred increased major osteoporotic fracture risk. We found that only three loci affecting fracture risk exhibited genetic effects not mediated by BMD: SOST, CPED1-WNT16, and RSPO3, while these three loci simultaneously conferred BMD-related effects. No strong genetic associations between non-BMD or BMD-related effects and 16 clinical risk factors were observed. However, non-BMD effects might be genetic correlated with hip bone size. In the UK Biobank, a 1 standard deviation (1-SD) increase in the non-BMD genetic risk score conferred an odds ratio of 1.17 for incident major osteoporotic fracture, compared to 1.29 by a BMD-related genetic risk score. Our study suggests that the majority of common genetic predisposition toward fracture risk acts upon BMD. Although non-BMD genetic effects may exist, they are not strongly correlated with most traditional clinical risk factors. Risk loci harboring non-BMD genetic effects may influence other perspectives of bone quality, or confer effects that existing GWASs fail to capture, but they demonstrate weaker impact on fracture risk than BMD-related genetic effects. These findings suggest that most successful drug development programs for osteoporosis should focus on pathways identified through BMD-associated loci. © 2022 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).
Topics: Bone Density; Genome-Wide Association Study; Human Genetics; Humans; Osteoporosis; Osteoporotic Fractures; Risk Factors
PubMed: 35689460
DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.4632 -
Journal of Endocrinological... Nov 2023Preventing fragility fractures by treating osteoporosis may reduce disability and mortality worldwide. Algorithms combining clinical risk factors with bone mineral...
PURPOSE
Preventing fragility fractures by treating osteoporosis may reduce disability and mortality worldwide. Algorithms combining clinical risk factors with bone mineral density have been developed to better estimate fracture risk and possible treatment thresholds. This systematic review supported panel members of the Italian Fragility Fracture Guidelines in recommending the use of best-performant tool. The clinical performance of the three most used fracture risk assessment tools (DeFRA, FRAX, and FRA-HS) was assessed in at-risk patients.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched till December 2020 for studies investigating risk assessment tools for predicting major osteoporotic or hip fractures in patients with osteoporosis or fragility fractures. Sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), and areas under the curve (AUCs) were evaluated for all tools at different thresholds. Quality assessment was performed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2; certainty of evidence (CoE) was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.
RESULTS
Forty-three articles were considered (40, 1, and 2 for FRAX, FRA-HS, and DeFRA, respectively), with the CoE ranging from very low to high quality. A reduction of Sn and increase of Sp for major osteoporotic fractures were observed among women and the entire population with cut-off augmentation. No significant differences were found on comparing FRAX to DeFRA in women (AUC 59-88% vs. 74%) and diabetics (AUC 73% vs. 89%). FRAX demonstrated non-significantly better discriminatory power than FRA-HS among men.
CONCLUSION
The task force formulated appropriate recommendations on the use of any fracture risk assessment tools in patients with or at risk of fragility fractures, since no statistically significant differences emerged across different prediction tools.
Topics: Male; Humans; Female; Osteoporosis; Osteoporotic Fractures; Bone Density; Risk Factors; Risk Assessment
PubMed: 37031450
DOI: 10.1007/s40618-023-02082-8