-
Journal of Clinical Medicine Sep 2022Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an immune-mediated esophageal disorder, linked with sensitization to food and airborne allergens. Dietary manipulations are proposed... (Review)
Review
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an immune-mediated esophageal disorder, linked with sensitization to food and airborne allergens. Dietary manipulations are proposed for the management of EoE inflammation and are often successful, confirming the etiological role of food allergens. Three different dietary approaches are widely used: the elemental, the empirical, and the allergy-test-driven approach. We performed a systematic review to assess the evidence on the association of allergens, detected by allergy tests, with clinically confirmed triggers of EoE. We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, through 1 June 2021. We sought studies examining the correlation of skin-prick tests (SPT), atopy patch tests (APT), specific IgE, and serum-specific IgG4, with confirmed triggers of EoE. Data on the use of prick-prick tests were also extracted. Evidence was independently screened by two authors against predefined eligibility criteria. Risk of bias was assessed with the ROBINS-I tool. Of 52 potentially eligible studies, 16 studies fulfilling quality criteria were included. These studies used one to three different allergy tests detecting food sensitization. The positive predictive value was generally low to moderate but higher when a combination of tests was used than single-test evaluations. None of the selected studies used serum-specific IgG4. Although an extreme methodological variability was noticed in the studies, allergy-based elimination diets were estimated to be efficient in 66.7% of the cases. The efficacy of targeted elimination diets, guided by SPT, sIgE, and/or APT allergy tests, does not appear superior to empirical ones. In the future, tests using esophageal prick testing or ex vivo food antigen stimulation may prove more efficient to guide elimination diets.
PubMed: 36233499
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11195631 -
Qatar Medical Journal 2023Patch testing is the primary diagnostic approach for contact dermatitis, an inflammatory skin reaction caused by exposure to external irritants. The pathophysiology of...
BACKGROUND
Patch testing is the primary diagnostic approach for contact dermatitis, an inflammatory skin reaction caused by exposure to external irritants. The pathophysiology of contact dermatitis may entail an immunological response (hypersensitivity type IV), a non-immunological response (irritant contact dermatitis), or a mix of the two. The diagnosis of contact dermatitis requires a correlation between a positive patch test and clinical relevance. This study aims to determine the prevalence of allergy sensitization among adults in Qatar and the allergens most frequently associated with positive patch test findings.
METHODS
Retrospective analysis used patch testing data from 2015 to 2022.
RESULTS
Of the 87 patients tested, 43 had at least one positive reaction (mean age 41.7; range 19-68). Females were 33 of the total patients (76.7%). Thirteen (30%) patients had two or more positive reactions. The most common allergen groups associated with positive patch test reactions were nickel sulfate no. 12 (27.9%), and all reactants were female. followed by gold sodium thiosulfate no. 10 (23.3%, F:M = 2.3), p-phenylenediamine no. 10 (23.3%, F:M = 1.5), and p-tert-butylphenol formaldehyde resin no. 7 (16.2%, F:M = 6). Twenty-six reactants had one or more allergic disorders (allergic rhinitis, asthma, drug allergy, insect bite allergy, or chronic idiopathic urticaria), and 11 had atopic dermatitis.
CONCLUSION
Triggering agents for contact dermatitis vary among geographic regions and populations. This study gives an idea of the allergens that are the most common sensitizers among the contact dermatitis population in the adult allergy clinic in Qatar.
PubMed: 38025332
DOI: 10.5339/qmj.2023.sqac.4 -
International Heart Journal 2022Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) is widely used in cardiovascular surgeries; however, postoperative complications such as thrombosis, calcification, and neointimal...
Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) is widely used in cardiovascular surgeries; however, postoperative complications such as thrombosis, calcification, and neointimal hyperplasia are yet to be resolved in patients. We developed two types of novel knitted PTFE patches and evaluated them using a swine model. Both patches were composed of knitted PTFE impregnated with micro-PTFE particles, and one of them was pressed after PTFE impregnation. Twenty micromini pigs were used in this study. After left lateral thoracotomy, the new patches (n = 8 for each type of patch) were implanted into the descending aorta and left atrium for the high- and low-pressure models, respectively. Clinically used expanded PTFE (ePTFE) patches were used as the control material (n = 4). The patches were explanted and histopathologically examined at 4, 12, and 24 weeks after implantation. A tensile test was also applied to the high-pressure model at 12 and 24 weeks. As a result, there was no significant difference noted in the tensile test, intimal hyperplasia thickness, or endothelialization among the three patches. In contrast, the degree of macrophage infiltration into the patches and the degree of macrophage, lymphocyte, and granulocyte infiltration outside the patches were lower in the new patches than in the control ePTFE. The degree of cellular infiltration outside new patches decreased over time. There were no significant differences between the two new patch types in these results. In conclusion, our novel knitted PTFE patch showed noninferiority in durability and intensity and less inflammatory responses than a clinically used ePTFE patch.
Topics: Animals; Aorta, Thoracic; Blood Vessel Prosthesis; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Male; Models, Animal; Polytetrafluoroethylene; Prosthesis Design; Surgical Mesh; Suture Techniques; Swine; Swine, Miniature; Tensile Strength
PubMed: 35095061
DOI: 10.1536/ihj.21-564 -
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology... Feb 2023Propylene glycol (PG) has widespread use in pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, fragrances and personal care products. PG is not classified as hazardous under the Globally... (Review)
Review
Propylene glycol (PG) has widespread use in pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, fragrances and personal care products. PG is not classified as hazardous under the Globally Harmonised System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) but poses an intriguing scientific and regulatory conundrum with respect to allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), the uncertainty being whether and to what extent PG has the potential to induce skin sensitisation. In this article we review the results of predictive tests for skin sensitisation with PG, and clinical evidence for ACD. Patch testing in humans points to PG having the potential to be a weak allergen under certain conditions, and an uncommon cause of ACD in subjects without underlying/pre-disposing skin conditions. In clear contrast PG is negative in predictive toxicology tests for skin sensitisation, including guinea pig and mouse models (e.g. local lymph node assay), validated in vitro test methods that measure various key events in the pathway leading to skin sensitisation, and predictive methods in humans (Human Repeat Insult Patch and Human Maximisation Tests). We here explore the possible scientific basis for this intriguing inconsistency, recognising there are arguably no known contact allergens that are universally negative in, in vitro, animal and human predictive tests methods.
Topics: Mice; Humans; Animals; Guinea Pigs; Dermatitis, Allergic Contact; Skin; Allergens; Skin Tests; Patch Tests; Propylene Glycol; Cosmetics
PubMed: 36702195
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2023.105341 -
Acta Medica Portuguesa Mar 2022Sarcoid granulomas can be found in a wide range of diseases and differentiating sarcoidosis from a sarcoid-like reaction may be a challenge. We present a woman with...
Sarcoid granulomas can be found in a wide range of diseases and differentiating sarcoidosis from a sarcoid-like reaction may be a challenge. We present a woman with erythematoviolaceous papulonodular lesions located on the ears where piercings were placed. A skin biopsy showing an infiltrate of sarcoid and focal tuberculoid granulomas did not exclude sarcoidosis. There was a slight increase in the level of angiotensin-converting enzyme. Systemic involvement due to sarcoidosis was excluded. Epicutaneous tests performed revealed a strong positive reaction to palladium and nickel, supporting the diagnosis of granulomatous contact dermatitis. There are only a few reports of granulomatous contact dermatitis to palladium with piercings as the source of sensitization. The formation of sarcoid granulomas can represent either a sarcoid-like reaction or a form of cutaneous sarcoidosis, and patch tests are essential in order to establish the diagnosis.
Topics: Cicatrix; Female; Granuloma; Humans; Sarcoidosis; Skin; Skin Diseases
PubMed: 34871541
DOI: 10.20344/amp.13451 -
Allergologie Select 2024Allergic contact dermatitis is one of the most frequent occupational skin diseases. Targeted allergen avoidance can only be achieved by identification of the causative... (Review)
Review
Allergic contact dermatitis is one of the most frequent occupational skin diseases. Targeted allergen avoidance can only be achieved by identification of the causative allergen. Therefore, patch testing is of utmost importance in occupational dermatology, not only in terms of assessing causal relationships but also regarding the implementation of prevention measures and evaluation of the legal criteria for an occupational skin disease in Germany (statutory occupational disease BK 5101). The lack of commercial patch test preparations poses a great diagnostic challenge. Patch testing of patient's own materials from their workplace is therefore very important to reduce diagnostic gaps. The performance and documentation of the patch test should be in line with current guidelines and recommendations to ensure the necessary test quality and comprehensibility of the test results.
PubMed: 38756208
DOI: 10.5414/ALX2483E -
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) Mar 2021There is a need for continuous, non-invasive monitoring of biological data to assess health and wellbeing. Currently, many types of smart patches have been developed to...
There is a need for continuous, non-invasive monitoring of biological data to assess health and wellbeing. Currently, many types of smart patches have been developed to continuously monitor body temperature, but few trials have been completed to evaluate psychometrics and feasibility for human subjects in real-life scenarios. The aim of this feasibility study was to evaluate the reliability, validity and usability of a smart patch measuring body temperature in healthy adults. The smart patch consisted of a fully integrated wearable wireless sensor with a multichannel temperature sensor, signal processing integrated circuit, wireless communication feature and a flexible battery. Thirty-five healthy adults were recruited for this test, carried out by wearing the patches on their upper chests for 24 h and checking their body temperature six times a day using infrared forehead thermometers as a gold standard for testing validity. Descriptive statistics, one-sampled and independent -tests, Pearson's correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plot were examined for body temperatures between two measures. In addition, multiple linear regression, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and qualitative content analysis were conducted. Among the 35 participants, 29 of them wore the patch for over 19 h (dropout rate: 17.14%). Mean body temperature measured by infrared forehead thermometers and smart patch ranged between 32.53 and 38.2 °C per person and were moderately correlated (r = 0.23-0.43) overall. Based on a Bland-Altman plot, approximately 94% of the measurements were located within one standard deviation (upper limit = 4.52, lower limit = -5.82). Most outliers were identified on the first measurement and were located below the lower limit. It is appropriate to use 37.5 °C in infrared forehead temperature as a cutoff to define febrile conditions. Users' position while checking and ambient temperature and humidity are not affected to the smart patch body temperature. Overall, the participants showed high usability and satisfaction on the survey. Few participants reported discomfort due to limited daily activity, itchy skin or detaching concerns. In conclusion, epidermal electronic sensor technologies provide a promising method for continuously monitoring individuals' body temperatures, even in real-life situations. Our study findings show the potential for smart patches to monitoring non-febrile condition in the community.
Topics: Adult; Body Temperature; Feasibility Studies; Humans; Psychometrics; Reproducibility of Results; Skin Temperature; Thermometers
PubMed: 33800920
DOI: 10.3390/s21051855 -
Medicine Aug 2022The purpose of this study is to screen and evaluate cosmetic products for sensitive skin on the face.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study is to screen and evaluate cosmetic products for sensitive skin on the face.
METHODS
Thirty-five subjects with positive lactic acid sting test (LAST) were recruited from the staff of our hospital from November 2019 to February 2020. First, the human skin enclosed patch test of cosmetic gel (abbreviated as gel) was performed, and then the tested products were continuously applied for 4 weeks to complete the long-term efficacy test. Subjects' sensation of application, pruritus, tingling and burning were assessed on a 0 to 9 scale prior to, 14, and 28 days after topical application. Moreover, the transepidermal water loss rate (TEWL), stratum corneum (SC) hydration, melanin index (MI), erythema index (EI) and dendritic cells and inflammatory cell infiltration were noninvasively detected by the tester. LAST were performed before applying, 14 and 28 days after application, and then the test results were compared.
RESULTS
In this study, a total of 34 people participated in the test. The results of human skin enclosed patch test indicated that only 1 case of grade 1 reaction occurred among the tested subjects. The subjects felt good after applying the products, and the gel showed high degree of skin comfortable, no irritation and good tolerability. Subjective safety evaluation illustrated that the scores of pruritus, tingling and burning of the subjects decreased in D14 and D28 patient revisit, showing statistically significant differences (P < .05). When the gel was applied for 4 weeks, TEWL (8.42 ± 1.12) and EI (201.35 ± 13.51) were lower than the results before application (P < .05), and the SC hydration (65.36 ± 2.56) was higher than that before application (P < .05). There was no correlation between the SC hydration and TEWL (R = 0.092, P = .416). The results of skin CT indicated that the number of facial dendritic cells decreased in 17 subjects (accounting for 50%) in D28 patient revisit, and the degree of inflammatory cell infiltration decreased in 27 subjects (accounting for 80%). Compared with the baseline value, the LAST score and total sensory score decreased after application the product for 4 weeks, and the difference was statistically significant (the mean value of P < .05).
CONCLUSION
The subjective feeling of application and efficacy of cosmetics in people with sensitive skin could be successfully evaluated by the comprehensive application of human skin enclosed patch test, long-term trial test, subjective safety evaluation and objective efficacy evaluation. And it provides the basis to judge whether the cosmetic is consistent with the efficacy claim of sensitive skin.
Topics: Cosmetics; Epidermis; Erythema; Humans; Pruritus; Skin
PubMed: 35945772
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029975 -
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational... 2023The recent global pandemic has resulted in increased use of quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs). Currently, QACs are active ingredients in 292 disinfectants recommended... (Review)
Review
The recent global pandemic has resulted in increased use of quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs). Currently, QACs are active ingredients in 292 disinfectants recommended by the US EPA for use against SARS-CoV-2. Among QACs, benzalkonium chloride (BAK), cetrimonium bromide (CTAB), cetrimonium chloride (CTAC), didecyldimethylammonium chloride (DDAC), cetrimide, quaternium-15, cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC), and benzethonium chloride (BEC) were all identified as potential culprits of skin sensitivity. Given their widespread utilization, additional research is needed to better classify their dermal effects and identify other cross-reactors. In this review, we aimed to expand our knowledge about these QACs to further dissect its potential allergic and irritant dermal effects on healthcare workers during COVID-19.
PubMed: 37409071
DOI: 10.2147/CCID.S410910 -
Skin Research and Technology : Official... Nov 2022Skin rejuvenation plays a significant role in the esthetic medicine market. Microneedle patches have been developed for a wide range of applications based on the... (Clinical Trial)
Clinical Trial
BACKGROUND
Skin rejuvenation plays a significant role in the esthetic medicine market. Microneedle patches have been developed for a wide range of applications based on the principles of transdermal drug delivery; however, clinical trials of microneedle patches for skin rejuvenation remain limited.
AIMS
This study was conducted to examine the efficacy of microneedle patches for improving nasolabial folds.
METHODS
A total of 23 Thai women completed this prospective clinical trial. The participants were treated according to a split-face design, with application of microneedle patch plus 1.8% hyaluronic acid solution to the right nasolabial fold and microneedle patch alone to the left nasolabial fold. The treatments were applied to the nasolabial fold for 8 weeks. The test areas were measured before treatment and at 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks after the use of the test product.
RESULTS
Combination treatment using the microneedle patch plus hyaluronic acid solution and use of the microneedle patch alone both significantly improved the Merz esthetic scales for nasolabial folds. Measurement of the nasolabial fold showed an improvement in the two groups, with no significant differences between the groups. No adverse effects were reported during the study period.
CONCLUSIONS
Application of a microneedle patch with 1.8% hyaluronic acid solution or a microneedle patch alone were both effective treatments for improving facial wrinkles in the nasolabial folds.
Topics: Humans; Female; Nasolabial Fold; Rejuvenation; Hyaluronic Acid; Skin Aging; Administration, Cutaneous; Treatment Outcome; Cosmetic Techniques
PubMed: 35974467
DOI: 10.1111/srt.13199