-
Brazilian Oral Research 2022Good communication between clinicians and pathologists is a vital element in the diagnostic process, and poor communication can adversely affect patient care. There is a... (Review)
Review
Good communication between clinicians and pathologists is a vital element in the diagnostic process, and poor communication can adversely affect patient care. There is a lack of research about communication in diagnostic oral and maxillofacial pathology. This narrative review explores different aspects of the quality of communication between clinicians and oral pathologists, with a focus on the diagnosis of oral and maxillofacial diseases. An electronic search was carried out in MEDLINE through the PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases up to April 2021. No studies reporting communication, its adequacy or the required skills between clinicians and pathologists in oral diagnosis were found. According to studies published in medicine, strategies for improving communication skills include clinician-pathologist collaboration; a well-formatted, clear and thorough report; training in communication skills; and patient-centered care. Further studies evaluating the current practices and quality in oral and maxillofacial pathology are required to identify barriers and encourage optimal communication to facilitate diagnosis, as well as patient safety.
Topics: Communication; Dentists; Humans; Pathologists; Patient-Centered Care
PubMed: 35081226
DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2022.vol36.0008 -
Arquivos de Gastroenterologia 2021Ileitis is defined as an inflammation of the ileum, which is evaluated during colonoscopy. Biopsies should be performed on altered ileus, aiding to the diagnosis.
BACKGROUND
Ileitis is defined as an inflammation of the ileum, which is evaluated during colonoscopy. Biopsies should be performed on altered ileus, aiding to the diagnosis.
OBJECTIVE
Evaluate the correlation of anatomopathological findings on ileitis between pathologists and endoscopists.
METHODS
A retrospective, cross-sectional study, between 2013 and 2017. Examination report, indications for colonoscopy, and medical records were evaluated to identify whether the colonoscopic findings were clinically significant. Anatomopathological samples were reviewed by a pathologist expert in gastrointestinal tract. Patients over 18 years of age who had undergone ileoscopy were included, whereas patients below 18 years of age and those with previous intestinal resections were excluded. The correlation was assessed using the kappa coefficient index.
RESULTS
A total of 5833 colonoscopies were conducted in the study period and 3880 cases were included. Ileal alterations were observed in 206 cases, with 2.94% being clinically significant. A hundred and sixty three biopsies were evaluated using the kappa index, resulting in agreement among pathologists of 0.067 and among pathologist and endoscopist of 0.141.
CONCLUSION
It was observed that despite the low concordance between pathologists and endoscopists, there was no change in patient outcomes. This study confirms the importance of knowledge of the main anatomopathological changes related to ileitis by pathologists and endoscopists, making the best diagnosis and follow-up.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Colonoscopy; Cross-Sectional Studies; Humans; Ileitis; Language; Pathologists; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 34231660
DOI: 10.1590/S0004-2803.202100000-25 -
Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic... May 2023
Topics: Animals; Humans; Pathologists; Pathology, Veterinary; Longitudinal Studies
PubMed: 37151017
DOI: 10.1177/10406387231157703 -
Archives of Pathology & Laboratory... Sep 2023Eosinophilic diseases of the gastrointestinal tract (EGIDs), eosinophilic gastritis (EoG), and eosinophilic duodenitis (EoD) are rarely suspected clinically and...
CONTEXT.—
Eosinophilic diseases of the gastrointestinal tract (EGIDs), eosinophilic gastritis (EoG), and eosinophilic duodenitis (EoD) are rarely suspected clinically and infrequently detected by pathologists.
OBJECTIVE.—
To determine whether histories of allergic or eosinophilic disorders and requests to rule out EoG and EoD affect pathologists' awareness of eosinophils in gastrointestinal biopsies.
DESIGN.—
Thirty-one community-based pathologists were given 16 sets of biopsies from gastric and duodenal mucosa with elevated eosinophils, Helicobacter pylori gastritis, atrophic gastritis, normal stomach and duodenum, lymphocytosis, and celiac disease. Participants were assigned to 3 groups: group A did not receive histories of allergic or eosinophilic conditions; group B received similar histories plus a clue of possible allergic or eosinophilic conditions; and group C received the same histories as B and was asked to rule out EoG/EoD. A list of gastric and duodenal diagnoses and a space for comments were provided. Results were analyzed descriptively.
RESULTS.—
Pathologists correctly diagnosed most noneosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders, indicating competence in gastrointestinal pathology. With respect to EoG and EoD, pathologists in group C performed significantly better that those in groups A and B. The combined odds ratio with 95% CI was 12.34 (2.87-53.04), P < .001, for A versus C and 4.02 (1.60-10.09), P < .02, for B versus C.
CONCLUSIONS.—
Most pathologists neither reported gastric/duodenal eosinophilia nor diagnosed EoG/EoD, even when provided histories of eosinophilic disorders. Requests to rule out EoG/EoD resulted in only 4 of 11 participants evaluating and counting eosinophils in some cases. Simple evidence-based histopathologic criteria are needed before pathologists can be expected to consider and diagnose EGIDs.
Topics: Humans; Pathologists; Eosinophilia; Gastritis; Duodenum; Duodenitis
PubMed: 36399607
DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2022-0204-OA -
Kidney International May 2020
Topics: Agriculture; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Humans; Nephritis, Interstitial; Pathologists; Renal Insufficiency
PubMed: 32331583
DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2020.01.023 -
Turk Patoloji Dergisi 2023In Turkey, autopsy performers, namely forensic medicine practitioners, are neither pathologists nor have properly received pathology training during residency in...
OBJECTIVE
In Turkey, autopsy performers, namely forensic medicine practitioners, are neither pathologists nor have properly received pathology training during residency in contrast to the Anglo-Saxon model of forensic medicine practices, since the current curriculum of forensic medicine residency lacks adequate training in post-mortem histopathology. Likewise, pathologists lack a specific post-mortem pathology clerkship. In this study, we intended to determine whether forensic physicians in Turkey find themselves competent in post-mortem histopathology or were adequately trained during their residencies.
MATERIAL AND METHOD
Turkish forensic medicine practitioners were administered an online questionnaire whereby self-evaluations of their histopathology knowledge and their views on histopathology training during forensic medicine residency were assessed. The 151 physicians who completed the questionnaire made up the study group.
RESULTS
It was found out that the majority of Turkish forensic medicine practitioners (85.4%) did not find the histopathology training during their residency adequate. Similarly, 85.4% of the participants indicated their incompetence in histopathological examination of post-mortem tissue of any kind, and showed their willingness for further training in pathology. 66.9% strongly agreed that post-mortem histopathology requires training that is distinct from surgical pathology. In case of providing post-mortem histopathology training within the scope of forensic medicine residency, topics such as microscopic morphology of post-mortem changes, histological changes related to injuries, and estimation of wound age are expected to be beneficial to 88.7% 83.4%, and 83.4% of the participants respectively.
CONCLUSION
The current curriculum should be revised in a way that the surgical pathology clerkship meets forensic physicians' needs, so that they can then refer more difficult, non-routine histopathological consultations to pathologists who are also well-trained in postmortem histopathology. Consideration should also be given to establishing a subspecialty training - a master's or doctoral degree programs in forensic pathology.
Topics: Humans; Autopsy; Forensic Medicine; Pathologists; Pathology, Surgical; Turkey
PubMed: 35102540
DOI: 10.5146/tjpath.2022.01569 -
Oncology 2020Synoptic reporting in tumour pathology is defined by (1) completeness in terms of data elements as well as (2) a specific, laboratory value-like format. Adoption of... (Review)
Review
Synoptic reporting in tumour pathology is defined by (1) completeness in terms of data elements as well as (2) a specific, laboratory value-like format. Adoption of synoptic reporting leads to more complete reporting of essential parameters, improved standardisation of diagnostic criteria and terminology, as well as easier retrieval of information. It is therefore associated with a high degree of satisfaction among end users including surgeons and oncologists and contributes to improvement of clinical care. Furthermore, synoptic reporting is an important step towards higher levels of data capture, which facilitate data exchange and analysis for quality assurance, cancer epidemiology and clinical and basic research. Increased interest in and adoption of synoptic reporting on a global level is stimulated by the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) which publishes freely available, evidence-based datasets for reporting an increasing number of different cancer types. These developments pave the path for increased future application of synoptic reporting across the entire field of oncologic medicine, where it will likely deploy similar benefits to those in pathology. Given that synoptic reporting can be considered the most precise means available for reporting of medical findings, it may be predicted to be critical for the promise of precision medicine to become real.
Topics: Guidelines as Topic; Humans; Neoplasms; Pathologists; Research Report; Societies, Medical
PubMed: 31177262
DOI: 10.1159/000500884 -
Laboratory Investigation; a Journal of... Nov 2023Pathology laboratories are increasingly using digital workflows. This has the potential of increasing laboratory efficiency, but the digitization process also involves... (Review)
Review
Pathology laboratories are increasingly using digital workflows. This has the potential of increasing laboratory efficiency, but the digitization process also involves major challenges. Several reports have been published describing the individual experiences of specific laboratories with the digitization process. However, a comprehensive overview of the lessons learned is still lacking. We provide an overview of the lessons learned for different aspects of the digitization process, including digital case management, digital slide reading, and computer-aided slide reading. We also cover metrics used for monitoring performance and pitfalls and corresponding values observed in practice. The overview is intended to help pathologists, information technology decision makers, and administrators to benefit from the experiences of others and to implement the digitization process in an optimal way to make their own laboratory future-proof.
Topics: Humans; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; Pathologists; Laboratories
PubMed: 37657651
DOI: 10.1016/j.labinv.2023.100244 -
The American Journal of Pathology Jan 2022
Topics: Animals; Financing, Organized; Humans; Mice; Mutation; Pathologists; Periodicals as Topic
PubMed: 34762872
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2021.11.001 -
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics :... Feb 2023To assess the clinical implementation of the 2017 Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation and Reporting of Sequence Variants in Cancer: A Joint Consensus... (Review)
Review
Assessments of Somatic Variant Classification Using the Association for Molecular Pathology/American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guidelines: A Report from the Association for Molecular Pathology.
To assess the clinical implementation of the 2017 Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation and Reporting of Sequence Variants in Cancer: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the Association for Molecular Pathology, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and College of American Pathologists, identify content that may result in classification inconsistencies, and evaluate implementation barriers, an Association for Molecular Pathology Working Group conducted variant interpretation challenges and a guideline implementation survey. A total of 134 participants participated in the variant interpretation challenges, consisting of 11 variants in four cancer cases. Results demonstrate 86% (range, 54% to 94%) of the respondents correctly classified clinically significant variants, variants of uncertain significance, and benign/likely benign variants; however, only 59% (range, 39% to 84%) of responses agreed with the working group's consensus intended responses regarding both tiers and categories of clinical significance. In the implementation survey, 71% (157/220) of respondents have implemented the 2017 guidelines for variant classification and reporting either with or without modifications. Collectively, this study demonstrates that, although they may not yet be optimized, the 2017 guideline recommendations are being adopted for standardized somatic variant classification. The working group identified significant areas for future guideline improvement, including the need for a more granular and comprehensive classification system and education resources to meet the growing needs of both laboratory professionals and medical oncologists.
Topics: Humans; United States; Pathology, Molecular; Pathologists; Neoplasms; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing; Medical Oncology
PubMed: 36503149
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2022.11.002