-
HPB : the Official Journal of the... Jan 2021Portal vein aneurysms (PVAs) are rare, though clinically challenging with post-operative mortality approaching 20% and no evidence-based treatment guidelines. We aim to...
BACKGROUND
Portal vein aneurysms (PVAs) are rare, though clinically challenging with post-operative mortality approaching 20% and no evidence-based treatment guidelines. We aim to describe our experience with PVAs and recommend optimum management strategies.
METHODS
Demographics and clinical details of patients with PVAs admitted to our institution from 1984 to 2019 were reviewed. Clinical presentation, management and outcomes were analysed.
RESULTS
PVAs were identified in 18 patients (median age 56 years, range 20-101 years; 13 female); 10 were incidental and 8 diagnosed during abdominal pain work-up. Median aneurysm diameter at diagnosis was 3.4 cm (1.8-5.5 cm), remaining unchanged at 3.5 cm (1.9-4.8 cm) during a 3.2-year follow-up (4 months-31 years). Aneurysm sites were the main portal vein (n = 12), porto-splenic-junction (n = 3), splenic-SMV-junction (n = 2) and right portal vein (n = 1). Thrombosis occurred in 4 patients; 3 developed clinically insignificant cavernous transformation. Two patients underwent surgery for abdominal pain. Postoperatively, one developed PV thrombosis and PVA recurrence occurred in the second. No aneurysm ruptures or mortalities occurred during follow-up.
CONCLUSION
PVAs follow a clinically indolent course with structural stability and minimal complications over time. Non-operative management is feasible for most patients. Abdominal pain, large size or thrombosis don't appear to confer additional risks and should not, in isolation, merit surgical intervention.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aneurysm; Feasibility Studies; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Portal Vein; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult
PubMed: 32561177
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.05.006 -
Medical Ultrasonography Feb 2022According to a novel in-utero classification termed "umbilical-portal-systemic venous shunt (UPSVS)" recently proposed for an abnormal umbilical, portal and ductal...
AIMS
According to a novel in-utero classification termed "umbilical-portal-systemic venous shunt (UPSVS)" recently proposed for an abnormal umbilical, portal and ductal venous system, the portal-systemic shunt belongs to type III UPSVS. This study was designed to examine the ultrasonographic characteristics and outcome of type III UPSVS.Material and methods: All cases of Type III UPSVS diagnosed at our department from April 2016 to December 2020 were retrospectively studied.
RESULTS
Seventeen patients with type III UPSVS including 12 type IIIa and 5 IIIb cases were identified. Sonography showed a shunt between the inferior left portal vein and the left hepatic vein in all type IIIa cases. Three cases of type IIIb had a combination of another shunt (2 with type I and one with type IIIa). Integrate intrahepatic portal vein system was not seen in those 2 cases of type IIIb combined with type I UPSVS, leading to termination of pregnancy (TOP). TOP occurred in 4 patients with type IIIa as requested by the parents. Two cases (type IIIa and type IIIb each) underwent surgical procedure for the closure of the shunt. Spontaneous complete closure in 4 type IIIa cases and partial closure in one type IIIb case occurred during a period of 3-16 months.
CONCLUSIONS
The majority of patients had type IIIa UPSVS presenting a good outcome. The lack of integrate intrahepatic portal vein system was the main reason for TOP in patients with type IIIb UPSVS. These data suggest the UPSVS classification is a useful tool for a prognosis prediction of type III UPSVS.
Topics: Female; Humans; Portal Vein; Pregnancy; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 34216452
DOI: 10.11152/mu-3163 -
BMC Gastroenterology Oct 2019Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) can induce a stronger regenerative ability than traditional 2-stage hepatectomy... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) can induce a stronger regenerative ability than traditional 2-stage hepatectomy (TSH). ALPPS has become popular for achieving fast hypertrophy in patients with an insufficient future liver remnant (FLR). However, ALPPS is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Partial ALPPS is a variation that may decrease the morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis comparing outcomes of ALLPS and partial ALLPS.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies comparing partial ALPPS and complete ALPPS up to April 2019. Included studies were assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Weighted mean difference (WMD)/standard mean difference (SMD) and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to compare FLR, time interval between stages, postoperative complications, and mortality between partial and complete ALPPS.
RESULTS
Four studies including 124 patients were included. FLR hypertrophy of partial ALPPS was comparable to complete ALPPS (p = 0.09). The time interval between stages was not different between the 2 procedures (p = 0.57). The postoperative complications rate of partial ALPPS was significantly lower than that of complete ALPPS (OR = 0.38; p = 0.03). The mortality rate of partial ALLPS (4.9%) was lower than that of complete ALLPS (18.9%), but the difference was not significant (OR = 0.37; p = 0.12).
CONCLUSIONS
Partial ALLPS is associated with similar FLR hypertrophy and time interval between stages as complete ALLPS, and a lower complication rate. Further studies are needed to examine patient selection and outcomes of the 2 procedures.
Topics: Hepatectomy; Humans; Hypertrophy; Ligation; Liver; Operative Time; Portal Vein; Postoperative Complications; Regeneration
PubMed: 31655548
DOI: 10.1186/s12876-019-1090-1 -
Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) 2021Non-tumoral portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is associated with higher morbidity and mortality in liver transplantation (LT). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the impact... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Non-tumoral portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is associated with higher morbidity and mortality in liver transplantation (LT). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the impact of PVT in LT outcomes and analyze the types of surgical techniques used for dealing with PVT during LT. A systematic review was conducted in Cochrane, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases, selecting articles from January 1990 to December 2019. The MESH-terms used were ("Portal Vein"[Mesh] AND "Thrombosis"[Mesh] NOT "Neoplasms"[Mesh]) AND ("Liver Transplantation"[Mesh]). The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) recommendation was used, and meta-analysis was performed with Review Manager Version 5.3 software. A total of 1,638 articles were initially found: 488 in PubMed, 289 in Cochrane Library, and 861 in EMBASE, from which 27 were eventually selected for the meta-analysis. Surgery time of LT in patients with PVT was longer than in patients without LT (p<0.0001). Intraoperative red blood cell (p<0.00001), fresh frozen plasma (p=0.01), and platelets (p=0.03) transfusions during LT were higher in patients with PVT. One-year (odds ratio [OR] 1.17; p=0.002) and 5-year (OR 1.12; p=0.01) patient survival after LT was worse in the PVT group. Total occlusive PVT presented higher mortality (OR 3.70; p=0.00009) and rethrombosis rates (OR 3.47 [1.18-10.21]; p=0.02). PVT Yerdel III/IV classification exhibited worse 1-year [2.04 (1.21-3.42); p=0.007] and 5-year [0.98 (0.59-1.62); p=0.93] patient survival. Thrombectomy with primary anastomosis was associated with better outcomes. LT in patients with non-tumoral PVT demands more surgical time, needs more intraoperative transfusion, and presents worse 1- and 5-year patient survival. Total occlusive PVT and Yerdel III/IV PVT classification were associated with higher mortality. (PROSPERO, registration number: CRD42020132915).
Topics: Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Liver Transplantation; Portal Vein; Retrospective Studies; Thrombectomy; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thrombosis
PubMed: 33503185
DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2021/e2184 -
BMC Surgery Aug 2022Liver transplantation is one of the most effective treatments for end-stage liver disease. Split liver transplantation (SLT) can effectively improve the utilization...
BACKGROUND
Liver transplantation is one of the most effective treatments for end-stage liver disease. Split liver transplantation (SLT) can effectively improve the utilization efficiency of grafts. However, split liver transplantation still faces shortcomings and is not widely used in surgery. How to improve the effective transplantation volume of split liver transplantation and promote the postoperative recovery of patients has important clinical significance.
METHODS
In our study, the donor's liver was split into the extended right graft and left lateral sector, and the IV segment occur ischemia. To guarantee the functional graft size, and avoid complications, we reconstructed the IV segment portal vein and left portal vein. And we analyzed the operation time, intraoperative bleeding, liver function, and postoperative complications.
RESULTS
In our research, 14 patients underwent IV segment portal vein reconstruction, and 8 patients did not undergo vascular reconstruction. We found that the ischemic area of the IV segment decreased significantly after IV segment portal vein reconstruction. We found that there was no significant difference in operation time and postoperative complications between the patients of the groups. There were significant differences in ALT on the 1st day and albumin on the 6th day after the operation.
CONCLUSION
It indicates that IV segment reconstruction in SLT surgery can alleviate the graft ischemic and promote the recovery of liver function after the operation. And, IV segment reconstruction as a novel operating procedure may be widely used in SLT.
Topics: End Stage Liver Disease; Humans; Liver Transplantation; Living Donors; Portal Vein; Postoperative Complications; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 35953816
DOI: 10.1186/s12893-022-01761-2 -
The American Journal of Case Reports Apr 2021BACKGROUND Non-malignant and non-cirrhotic portal and mesenteric vein thrombosis is rare. It has been reported that the hyperthyroid state is associated with increased...
BACKGROUND Non-malignant and non-cirrhotic portal and mesenteric vein thrombosis is rare. It has been reported that the hyperthyroid state is associated with increased risks of venous thrombosis due to increases in levels of various coagulation and anti-fibrinolytic factors. Particularly, changes in levels of these factors are also reported in cases of portal and mesenteric vein thrombosis. Although hyperthyroidism is not known as a risk factor for portal and mesenteric vein thrombosis, it might be an underlying pathogenesis of hyperthyroidism-associated portal and mesenteric vein thrombosis. CASE REPORT A 59-year-old Japanese man with a history of Grave's disease presented with acute portal and mesenteric vein thrombosis and hyperthyroidism. Anticoagulation therapy was initiated and the dose of antithyroid drug was increased. He underwent various tests to identify causes of portal and mesenteric vein thrombosis. However, all test results were within normal range except for hyperthyroidism. Therefore, we discontinued anticoagulation therapy after normalization of thyroid hormone status. After 3 years, he experienced recurrence of portal vein thrombosis concomitant with hyperthyroidism. CONCLUSIONS Hyperthyroidism might be associated with portal vein thrombosis. Thyroid function tests should be performed in cases of portal and mesenteric vein thrombosis in the absence of other risk factors.
Topics: Humans; Hyperthyroidism; Male; Mesenteric Veins; Middle Aged; Portal Vein; Thrombolytic Therapy; Venous Thrombosis
PubMed: 33819210
DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.929565 -
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia... 2022Knowledge of the portal system and its anatomical variations aids to prevent surgical adverse events. The portal vein is usually made by the confluence of the superior...
AIM
Knowledge of the portal system and its anatomical variations aids to prevent surgical adverse events. The portal vein is usually made by the confluence of the superior mesenteric and splenic veins, together with their main tributaries, the inferior mesenteric, left gastric, and pancreaticoduodenal veins; however, anatomical variations are frequent. This article presents a literature review regarding previously described anatomical variations of the portal venous system and their frequency.
METHODS
A systematic review of primary studies was performed in the databases PubMed, SciELO, BIREME, LILACS, Embase, ScienceDirect, and Scopus. Databases were searched for the following key terms: Anatomy, Portal vein, Mesenteric vein, Formation, Variation, Variant anatomic, Splenomesenteric vein, Splenic vein tributaries, and Confluence.
RESULTS
We identified 12 variants of the portal venous bed, representing different unions of the splenic vein, superior mesenteric vein, and inferior mesenteric vein. Thomson classification of the end of 19th century refers to the three most frequent variants, with type I as predominant (M=47%), followed by type III (M=27.8%) and type II (M=18.6%).
CONCLUSION
Thomson classification of variants is the most well-known, accounting for over 90% of portal venous variant found in clinical practice, inasmuch as the sum of the three junctions are found in over 93% of the patients. Even though rarer and accounting for less than 7% of variants, the other nine reported variations will occasionally be found during many abdominal operations.
Topics: Abdomen; Humans; Mesenteric Veins; Portal Vein; Splenic Vein; Stomach
PubMed: 35766611
DOI: 10.1590/0102-672020210002e1666 -
Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) Mar 2022Abernethy malformation, or congenital extrahepatic portosystemic venous shunt, is a rare anomaly involving the portal venous system. Despite its rarity, it is...
Abernethy malformation, or congenital extrahepatic portosystemic venous shunt, is a rare anomaly involving the portal venous system. Despite its rarity, it is increasingly being reported, and therefore, it is important to diagnose given the potential adverse clinical consequences if left untreated. It has a spectrum of presentations, ranging from complete lack of symptoms, to causing hepatic carcinoma, hepatic encephalopathy, severe pulmonary hypertension, and diffuse pulmonary arteriovenous malformation. We herein describe the case and echocardiographic, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging findings of a transgender individual, with this anomaly detected incidentally during adulthood.
Topics: Adult; Arteriovenous Fistula; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Portal Vein; Vascular Malformations
PubMed: 35170090
DOI: 10.1111/echo.15324 -
BMC Infectious Diseases May 2023Hepatic alveolar echinococcosis (HAE), as a benign parasitic disease with malignant infiltrative activity, grows slowly in the liver, allowing sufficient time for...
BACKGROUND
Hepatic alveolar echinococcosis (HAE), as a benign parasitic disease with malignant infiltrative activity, grows slowly in the liver, allowing sufficient time for collateral vessels to emerge in the process of vascular occlusion.
METHODS
The portal vein (PV), hepatic vein and hepatic artery were observed by enhanced CT and the inferior vena cava (IVC) by angiography, respectively. Analysis of the anatomical characteristics of the collateral vessels helped to look into the pattern and characteristics of vascular collateralization caused by this specific etiology.
RESULTS
33, 5, 12 and 1 patients were included in the formation of collateral vessels in PV, hepatic vein, IVC and hepatic artery, respectively. PV collateral vessels were divided into two categories according to different pathways: type I: portal -portal venous pathway (13 cases) and type II: type I incorporates a portal-systemic circulation pathway (20 cases). Hepatic vein (HV) collateral vessels fell into short hepatic veins. The patients with IVC collateral presented with both vertebral and lumbar venous varices. Hepatic artery collateral vessels emanating from the celiac trunk maintains blood supply to the healthy side of the liver.
CONCLUSIONS
Due to its special biological nature, HAE exhibited unique collateral vessels that were rarely seen in other diseases. An in-depth study would be of great help to improve our understanding related to the process of collateral vessel formation due to intrahepatic lesions and its comorbidity, in addition to providing new ideas for the surgical treatment of end-stage HAE.
Topics: Humans; Echinococcosis, Hepatic; Collateral Circulation; Portal Vein; Vena Cava, Inferior
PubMed: 37189056
DOI: 10.1186/s12879-022-07970-7 -
World Journal of Gastroenterology Jun 2020Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is currently not considered a contraindication for liver transplantation (LT), but diffuse or complicated PVT remains a major surgical... (Review)
Review
Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is currently not considered a contraindication for liver transplantation (LT), but diffuse or complicated PVT remains a major surgical challenge. Here, we review the prevalence, natural course and current grading systems of PVT and propose a tailored classification of PVT in the setting of LT. PVT in liver transplant recipients is classified into three types, corresponding to three portal reconstruction strategies: Anatomical, physiological and non-physiological. Type I PVT can be removed low dissection of the portal vein (PV) or thrombectomy; porto-portal anastomosis is then performed with or without an interposed vascular graft. Physiological reconstruction used for type II PVT includes vascular interposition between mesenteric veins and PV, collateral-PV and splenic vein-PV anastomosis. Non-physiological reconstruction used for type III PVT includes cavoportal hemitransposition, renoportal anastomosis, portal vein arterialization and multivisceral transplantation. All portal reconstruction techniques were reviewed. This tailored classification system stratifies PVT patients by surgical complexity, risk of postoperative complications and long-term survival. We advocate using the tailored classification for PVT grading before LT, which will urge transplant surgeons to make a better preoperative planning and pay more attention to all potential strategies for portal reconstruction. Further verification in a large-sample cohort study is needed.
Topics: Allografts; Anastomosis, Surgical; Dissection; Humans; Liver; Liver Transplantation; Patient Care Planning; Portal Vein; Postoperative Complications; Preoperative Period; Prevalence; Thrombectomy; Venous Thrombosis
PubMed: 32550747
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i21.2691