-
Genes & Development Jan 2022During meiosis, a molecular program induces DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and their repair by homologous recombination. DSBs can be repaired with or without... (Review)
Review
During meiosis, a molecular program induces DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and their repair by homologous recombination. DSBs can be repaired with or without crossovers. ZMM proteins promote the repair toward crossover. The sites of DSB repair are also sites where the axes of homologous chromosomes are juxtaposed and stabilized, and where a structure called the synaptonemal complex initiates, providing further regulation of both DSB formation and repair. How crossover formation and synapsis initiation are linked has remained unknown. The study by Pyatnitskaya and colleagues (pp. 53-69) in this issue of highlights the central role of the ZMM protein Zip4 in this process.
Topics: Chromosome Pairing; Crossing Over, Genetic; DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded; DNA Repair; Meiosis; Synaptonemal Complex
PubMed: 35022326
DOI: 10.1101/gad.349286.121 -
Annual Review of Genetics Nov 2023The raison d'ĂȘtre of meiosis is shuffling of genetic information via Mendelian segregation and, within individual chromosomes, by DNA crossing-over. These outcomes are... (Review)
Review
The raison d'ĂȘtre of meiosis is shuffling of genetic information via Mendelian segregation and, within individual chromosomes, by DNA crossing-over. These outcomes are enabled by a complex cellular program in which interactions between homologous chromosomes play a central role. We first provide a background regarding the basic principles of this program. We then summarize the current understanding of the DNA events of recombination and of three processes that involve whole chromosomes: homolog pairing, crossover interference, and chiasma maturation. All of these processes are implemented by direct physical interaction of recombination complexes with underlying chromosome structures. Finally, we present convergent lines of evidence that the meiotic program may have evolved by coupling of this interaction to late-stage mitotic chromosome morphogenesis.
Topics: Chromosome Pairing; Meiosis; Chromosomes; DNA; Chromosome Segregation; Crossing Over, Genetic
PubMed: 37788458
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genet-061323-044915 -
Nature Communications Mar 2023N6-methyladenosine (m6A) and its reader proteins YTHDC1, YTHDC2, and YTHDF2 have been shown to exert essential functions during spermatogenesis. However, much remains...
N6-methyladenosine (m6A) and its reader proteins YTHDC1, YTHDC2, and YTHDF2 have been shown to exert essential functions during spermatogenesis. However, much remains unknown about m6A regulation mechanisms and the functions of specific readers during the meiotic cell cycle. Here, we show that the m6A reader Proline rich coiled-coil 2A (PRRC2A) is essential for male fertility. Germ cell-specific knockout of Prrc2a causes XY asynapsis and impaired meiotic sex chromosome inactivation in late-prophase spermatocytes. Moreover, PRRC2A-null spermatocytes exhibit delayed metaphase entry, chromosome misalignment, and spindle disorganization at metaphase I and are finally arrested at this stage. Sequencing data reveal that PRRC2A decreases the RNA abundance or improves the translation efficiency of targeting transcripts. Specifically, PRRC2A recognizes spermatogonia-specific transcripts and downregulates their RNA abundance to maintain the spermatocyte expression pattern during the meiosis prophase. For genes involved in meiotic cell division, PRRC2A improves the translation efficiency of their transcripts. Further, co-immunoprecipitation data show that PRRC2A interacts with several proteins regulating mRNA metabolism or translation (YBX1, YBX2, PABPC1, FXR1, and EIF4G3). Our study reveals post-transcriptional functions of PRRC2A and demonstrates its critical role in the completion of meiosis I in spermatogenesis.
Topics: Male; Humans; Spermatogenesis; Meiosis; Prophase; Spermatocytes; Sex Chromosomes; RNA
PubMed: 36964127
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-37252-y -
Cell Reports Mar 2022The DSB machinery, which induces the programmed DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in the leptotene and zygotene stages during meiosis, is suppressed before the onset of...
The DSB machinery, which induces the programmed DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in the leptotene and zygotene stages during meiosis, is suppressed before the onset of the pachytene stage. However, the biological significance and underlying mechanisms remain largely unclear. Here, we report that ZFP541 is indispensable for the suppression of DSB formation after mid-pachytene. The deletion of Zfp541 in mice causes the aberrant recruitment of DSB machinery to chromosome axes and generation of massive DSBs in late pachytene and diplotene spermatocytes, leading to meiotic arrest at the diplotene stage. Integrated analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) sequencing data indicate that ZFP541 predominantly binds to promoters of pre-pachytene genes, including meiotic DSB formation-related genes (e.g., Prdm9 and Mei1) and their upstream activators (e.g., Meiosin and Rxra), and maintains their repression in pachytene spermatocytes. Our results reveal that ZFP541 functions as a transcriptional regulator in pachytene spermatocytes, orchestrating the transcriptome to ensure meiosis progression.
Topics: Animals; Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone; DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded; Histone-Lysine N-Methyltransferase; Male; Meiosis; Meiotic Prophase I; Mice; Pachytene Stage; Spermatocytes; Transcription Factors
PubMed: 35320728
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110540 -
Cell Research Mar 2022In response to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), DNA damage repair factors are recruited to DNA lesions and form nuclear foci. However, the underlying molecular mechanism...
In response to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), DNA damage repair factors are recruited to DNA lesions and form nuclear foci. However, the underlying molecular mechanism remains largely elusive. Here, by analyzing the localization of DSB repair factors in the XY body and DSB foci, we demonstrate that pre-ribosomal RNA (pre-rRNA) mediates the recruitment of DSB repair factors around DNA lesions. Pre-rRNA exists in the XY body, a DSB repair hub, during meiotic prophase, and colocalizes with DSB repair factors, such as MDC1, BRCA1 and TopBP1. Moreover, pre-rRNA-associated proteins and RNAs, such as ribosomal protein subunits, RNase MRP and snoRNAs, also localize in the XY body. Similar to those in the XY body, pre-rRNA and ribosomal proteins also localize at DSB foci and associate with DSB repair factors. RNA polymerase I inhibitor treatment that transiently suppresses transcription of rDNA but does not affect global protein translation abolishes foci formation of DSB repair factors as well as DSB repair. The FHA domain and PST repeats of MDC1 recognize pre-rRNA and mediate phase separation of DSB repair factors, which may be the molecular basis for the foci formation of DSB repair factors during DSB response.
Topics: Cell Cycle Proteins; DNA; DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded; DNA Damage; DNA Repair; Meiosis; Prophase; RNA Precursors; RNA, Ribosomal
PubMed: 34980897
DOI: 10.1038/s41422-021-00597-4 -
Nucleic Acids Research Oct 2022Post-transcriptional RNA modifications critically regulate various biological processes. N4-acetylcytidine (ac4C) is an epi-transcriptome, which is highly conserved in...
Post-transcriptional RNA modifications critically regulate various biological processes. N4-acetylcytidine (ac4C) is an epi-transcriptome, which is highly conserved in all species. However, the in vivo physiological functions and regulatory mechanisms of ac4C remain poorly understood, particularly in mammals. In this study, we demonstrate that the only known ac4C writer, N-acetyltransferase 10 (NAT10), plays an essential role in male reproduction. We identified the occurrence of ac4C in the mRNAs of mouse tissues and showed that ac4C undergoes dynamic changes during spermatogenesis. Germ cell-specific ablation of Nat10 severely inhibits meiotic entry and leads to defects in homologous chromosome synapsis, meiotic recombination and repair of DNA double-strand breaks during meiosis. Transcriptomic profiling revealed dysregulation of functional genes in meiotic prophase I after Nat10 deletion. These findings highlight the crucial physiological functions of ac4C modifications in male spermatogenesis and expand our understanding of its role in the regulation of specific physiological processes in vivo.
Topics: Male; Mice; Animals; Meiosis; Cytidine; Chromosome Pairing; Germ Cells; Mammals
PubMed: 35801907
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkac594 -
Trends in Genetics : TIG Nov 2019X inactivation presents two longstanding puzzles: the counting and choice of X chromosomes. Here, we consider counting and choice in the context of pairing, both of the...
X inactivation presents two longstanding puzzles: the counting and choice of X chromosomes. Here, we consider counting and choice in the context of pairing, both of the X and of the autosomes.
Topics: Animals; Chromosome Pairing; Chromosomes; Humans; Mammals; Mice; Models, Genetic; X Chromosome; X Chromosome Inactivation
PubMed: 31521404
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2019.07.010 -
Nucleic Acids Research May 2023Meiotic recombinases RAD51 and DMC1 mediate strand exchange in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) by homologous recombination. This is a landmark event of...
Meiotic recombinases RAD51 and DMC1 mediate strand exchange in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) by homologous recombination. This is a landmark event of meiosis that ensures genetic diversity in sexually reproducing organisms. However, the regulatory mechanism of DMC1/RAD51-ssDNA nucleoprotein filaments during homologous recombination in mammals has remained largely elusive. Here, we show that SPIDR (scaffold protein involved in DNA repair) regulates the assembly or stability of RAD51/DMC1 on ssDNA. Knockout of Spidr in male mice causes complete meiotic arrest, accompanied by defects in synapsis and crossover formation, which leads to male infertility. In females, loss of Spidr leads to subfertility; some Spidr-/- oocytes are able to complete meiosis. Notably, fertility is rescued partially by ablation of the DNA damage checkpoint kinase CHK2 in Spidr-/- females but not in males. Thus, our study identifies SPIDR as an essential meiotic recombination factor in homologous recombination in mammals.
Topics: Animals; Male; Mice; Cell Cycle Proteins; Chromosome Pairing; DNA Repair; Homologous Recombination; Mammals; Meiosis; Mice, Knockout; Rad51 Recombinase
PubMed: 36938872
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkad154 -
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental... 2021Recent studies in zebrafish have revealed key features of meiotic chromosome dynamics, including clustering of telomeres in the bouquet configuration, biogenesis of... (Review)
Review
Recent studies in zebrafish have revealed key features of meiotic chromosome dynamics, including clustering of telomeres in the bouquet configuration, biogenesis of chromosome axis structures, and the assembly and disassembly of the synaptonemal complex that aligns homologs end-to-end. The telomere bouquet stage is especially pronounced in zebrafish meiosis and sub-telomeric regions play key roles in mediating pairing and homologous recombination. In this review, we discuss the temporal progression of these events in meiosis prophase I and highlight the roles of proteins associated with meiotic chromosome architecture in homologous recombination. Finally, we discuss the interplay between meiotic mutants and gonadal sex differentiation and future research directions to study meiosis in living cells, including cell culture.
PubMed: 34692709
DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.757445 -
Current Biology : CB Mar 2021Cathleen Lake and Scott Hawley discuss the components, assembly and functional importance of the synaptonemal complex.
Cathleen Lake and Scott Hawley discuss the components, assembly and functional importance of the synaptonemal complex.
Topics: Animals; Chromosome Pairing; Chromosome Segregation; Crossing Over, Genetic; Humans; Meiosis; Schizosaccharomyces; Synaptonemal Complex
PubMed: 33689714
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.01.015