-
FEBS Letters Apr 2021Most mitochondrial proteins are synthesized in the cytosol and subsequently translocated as unfolded polypeptides into mitochondria. Cytosolic chaperones maintain... (Review)
Review
Most mitochondrial proteins are synthesized in the cytosol and subsequently translocated as unfolded polypeptides into mitochondria. Cytosolic chaperones maintain precursor proteins in an import-competent state. This post-translational import reaction is under surveillance of the cytosolic ubiquitin-proteasome system, which carries out several distinguishable activities. On the one hand, the proteasome degrades nonproductive protein precursors from the cytosol and nucleus, import intermediates that are stuck in mitochondrial translocases, and misfolded or damaged proteins from the outer membrane and the intermembrane space. These surveillance activities of the proteasome are essential for mitochondrial functionality, as well as cellular fitness and survival. On the other hand, the proteasome competes with mitochondria for nonimported cytosolic precursor proteins, which can compromise mitochondrial biogenesis. In order to balance the positive and negative effects of the cytosolic protein quality control system on mitochondria, mitochondrial import efficiency directly regulates the capacity of the proteasome via transcription factor Rpn4 in yeast and nuclear respiratory factor (Nrf) 1 and 2 in animal cells. In this review, we provide a thorough overview of how the proteasome regulates mitochondrial biogenesis.
Topics: Animals; Humans; Mitochondria; Mitochondrial Proteins; Organelle Biogenesis; Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex; Proteolysis
PubMed: 33249599
DOI: 10.1002/1873-3468.14010 -
Proceedings of the National Academy of... Jun 2021The 26S proteasome is the macromolecular machine responsible for the bulk of protein degradation in eukaryotic cells. As it degrades a ubiquitinated protein, the...
The 26S proteasome is the macromolecular machine responsible for the bulk of protein degradation in eukaryotic cells. As it degrades a ubiquitinated protein, the proteasome transitions from a substrate-accepting conformation (s1) to a set of substrate-processing conformations (s3 like), each stabilized by different intramolecular contacts. Tools to study these conformational changes remain limited, and although several interactions have been proposed to be important for stabilizing the proteasome's various conformations, it has been difficult to test these directly under equilibrium conditions. Here, we describe a conformationally sensitive Förster resonance energy transfer assay, in which fluorescent proteins are fused to Sem1 and Rpn6, which are nearer each other in substrate-processing conformations than in the substrate-accepting conformation. Using this assay, we find that two sets of interactions, one involving Rpn5 and another involving Rpn2, are both important for stabilizing substrate-processing conformations. Mutations that disrupt these interactions both destabilize substrate-processing conformations relative to the substrate-accepting conformation and diminish the proteasome's ability to successfully unfold and degrade hard-to-unfold substrates, providing a link between the proteasome's conformational state and its unfolding ability.
Topics: Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer; Green Fluorescent Proteins; Models, Molecular; Mutation; Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex; Protein Conformation; Protein Unfolding
PubMed: 34161281
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2101004118 -
Cells Dec 2021Cell-mediated immunity is driven by antigenic peptide presentation on major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules. Specialized proteasome complexes called... (Review)
Review
Cell-mediated immunity is driven by antigenic peptide presentation on major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules. Specialized proteasome complexes called immunoproteasomes process viral, bacterial, and tumor antigens for presentation on MHC class I molecules, which can induce CD8 T cells to mount effective immune responses. Immunoproteasomes are distinguished by three subunits that alter the catalytic activity of the proteasome and are inducible by inflammatory stimuli such as interferon-γ (IFN-γ). This inducible activity places them in central roles in cancer, autoimmunity, and inflammation. While accelerated proteasomal degradation is an important tumorigenic mechanism deployed by several cancers, there is some ambiguity regarding the role of immunoproteasome induction in neoplastic transformation. Understanding the mechanistic and functional relevance of the immunoproteasome provides essential insights into developing targeted therapies, including overcoming resistance to standard proteasome inhibition and immunomodulation of the tumor microenvironment. In this review, we discuss the roles of the immunoproteasome in different cancers.
Topics: Animals; Humans; Models, Biological; Neoplasms; Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex; Proteasome Inhibitors; Protein Subunits
PubMed: 34944095
DOI: 10.3390/cells10123587 -
Scientific Reports Sep 2023Proteasomes are multi-subunit complexes that specialize in protein degradation. Cancer cells exhibit a heightened dependence on proteasome activity, presumably to...
Proteasomes are multi-subunit complexes that specialize in protein degradation. Cancer cells exhibit a heightened dependence on proteasome activity, presumably to support their enhanced proliferation and other cancer-related characteristics. Here, a systematic analysis of TCGA breast cancer datasets revealed that proteasome subunit transcript levels are elevated in all intrinsic subtypes (luminal, HER2-enriched, and basal-like/triple-negative) when compared to normal breast tissue. Although these observations suggest a pan-breast cancer utility for proteasome inhibitors, our further experiments with breast cancer cell lines and patient-derived xenografts (PDX) pointed to triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) as the most sensitive subtype to proteasome inhibition. Finally, using TNBC cells, we extended our studies to in vivo xenograft experiments. Our previous work has firmly established a cytoprotective role for the transcription factor NRF1 via its ability to upregulate proteasome genes in response to proteasome inhibition. In further support of this notion, we show here that NRF1 depletion significantly reduced tumor burden in an MDA-MB-231 TNBC xenograft mouse model treated with carfilzomib. Taken together, our results point to TNBC as a particularly vulnerable breast cancer subtype to proteasome inhibition and provide a proof-of-principle for targeting NRF1 as a viable means to increase the efficacy of proteasome inhibitors in TNBC tumors.
Topics: Animals; Humans; Mice; Cytoplasm; Disease Models, Animal; Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex; Proteasome Inhibitors; Proteolysis; Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms; NF-E2-Related Factor 1
PubMed: 37739987
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-43121-x -
Biomolecules May 2022Allostery-regulation at distant sites is a key concept in biology. The proteasome exhibits multiple forms of allosteric regulation. This regulatory communication can... (Review)
Review
Allostery-regulation at distant sites is a key concept in biology. The proteasome exhibits multiple forms of allosteric regulation. This regulatory communication can span a distance exceeding 100 Ångstroms and can modulate interactions between the two major proteasome modules: its core particle and regulatory complexes. Allostery can further influence the assembly of the core particle with regulatory particles. In this focused review, known and postulated interactions between these proteasome modules are described. Allostery may explain how cells build and maintain diverse populations of proteasome assemblies and can provide opportunities for therapeutic interventions.
Topics: Allosteric Regulation; Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex
PubMed: 35740889
DOI: 10.3390/biom12060764 -
Cells Feb 2023RUNX3 is a transcription factor with regulatory roles in cell proliferation and development. While largely characterized as a tumor suppressor, RUNX3 can also be... (Review)
Review
RUNX3 is a transcription factor with regulatory roles in cell proliferation and development. While largely characterized as a tumor suppressor, RUNX3 can also be oncogenic in certain cancers. Many factors account for the tumor suppressor function of RUNX3, which is reflected by its ability to suppress cancer cell proliferation after expression-restoration, and its inactivation in cancer cells. Ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation represent a major mechanism for the inactivation of RUNX3 and the suppression of cancer cell proliferation. On the one hand, RUNX3 has been shown to facilitate the ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of oncogenic proteins. On the other hand, RUNX3 can be inactivated through the ubiquitin-proteasome system. This review encapsulates two facets of RUNX3 in cancer: how RUNX3 suppresses cell proliferation by facilitating the ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of oncogenic proteins, and how RUNX3 is degraded itself through interacting RNA-, protein-, and pathogen-mediated ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation.
Topics: Humans; Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex; Ubiquitin; Ubiquitination; Neoplasms; Core Binding Factor Alpha 3 Subunit
PubMed: 36899853
DOI: 10.3390/cells12050717 -
Cells Mar 2023The mammalian 20S catalytic core of the proteasome is made of 14 different subunits (α1-7 and β1-7) but exists as different subtypes depending on the cell type. In...
The mammalian 20S catalytic core of the proteasome is made of 14 different subunits (α1-7 and β1-7) but exists as different subtypes depending on the cell type. In immune cells, for instance, constitutive catalytic proteasome subunits can be replaced by the so-called immuno-catalytic subunits, giving rise to the immunoproteasome. Proteasome activity is also altered by post-translational modifications (PTMs) and by genetic variants. Immunochemical methods are commonly used to investigate these PTMs whereby protein-tagging is necessary to monitor their effect on 20S assembly. Here, we present a new miniaturized workflow combining top-down and bottom-up mass spectrometry of immunopurified 20S proteasomes that analyze the proteasome assembly status as well as the full proteoform footprint, revealing PTMs, mutations, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and induction of immune-subunits in different biological samples, including organoids, biopsies and B-lymphoblastoid cell lines derived from patients with proteasome-associated autoinflammatory syndromes (PRAAS). We emphasize the benefits of using top-down mass spectrometry in preserving the endogenous conformation of protein modifications, while enabling a rapid turnaround (1 h run) and ensuring high sensitivity (1-2 pmol) and demonstrate its capacity to semi-quantify constitutive and immune proteasome subunits.
Topics: Animals; Humans; Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex; Cytoplasm; Mass Spectrometry; Protein Processing, Post-Translational; Cell Line; Mammals
PubMed: 36980185
DOI: 10.3390/cells12060844 -
Cells Nov 2021Numerous cellular processes are controlled by the proteasome, a multicatalytic protease in the cytosol and nucleus of all eukaryotic cells, through regulated protein... (Review)
Review
Numerous cellular processes are controlled by the proteasome, a multicatalytic protease in the cytosol and nucleus of all eukaryotic cells, through regulated protein degradation. The immunoproteasome is a special type of proteasome which is inducible under inflammatory conditions and constitutively expressed in hematopoietic cells. MECL-1 (β2i), LMP2 (β1i), and LMP7 (β5i) are the proteolytically active subunits of the immunoproteasome (IP), which is known to shape the antigenic repertoire presented on major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules. Furthermore, the immunoproteasome is involved in T cell expansion and inflammatory diseases. In recent years, targeting the immunoproteasome in cancer, autoimmune diseases, and transplantation proved to be therapeutically effective in preclinical animal models. However, the prime function of standard proteasomes and immunoproteasomes is the control of protein homeostasis in cells. To maintain protein homeostasis in cells, proteasomes remove proteins which are not properly folded, which are damaged by stress conditions such as reactive oxygen species formation, or which have to be degraded on the basis of regular protein turnover. In this review we summarize the latest insights on how the immunoproteasome influences protein homeostasis.
Topics: Animals; Humans; Models, Biological; Oxidation-Reduction; Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex; Proteolysis; Proteostasis; Ubiquitination
PubMed: 34831438
DOI: 10.3390/cells10113216 -
Angewandte Chemie (International Ed. in... Jan 2021Cell-cycle interference by small molecules has widely been used to study fundamental biological mechanisms and to treat a great variety of diseases, most notably cancer....
Cell-cycle interference by small molecules has widely been used to study fundamental biological mechanisms and to treat a great variety of diseases, most notably cancer. However, at present only limited possibilities exist for spatio-temporal control of the cell cycle. Here we report on a photocaging strategy to reversibly arrest the cell cycle at metaphase or induce apoptosis using blue-light irradiation. The versatile proteasome inhibitor MG132 is photocaged directly at the reactive aldehyde function effectively masking its biological activity. Upon irradiation reversible cell-cycle arrest in the metaphase is demonstrated to take place in vivo. Similarly, apoptosis can efficiently be induced by irradiation of human cancer cells. With the developed photopharmacological approach spatio-temporal control of the cell cycle is thus enabled with very high modulation, as caged MG132 shows no effect on proliferation in the dark. In addition, full compatibility of photo-controlled uncaging with dynamic microscopy techniques in vivo is demonstrated. This visible-light responsive tool should be of great value for biological as well as medicinal approaches in need of high-precision targeting of the proteasome and thereby the cell cycle and apoptosis.
Topics: Apoptosis; Cell Cycle Checkpoints; Humans; Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex
PubMed: 33035402
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202008267 -
Biomolecules Jan 2022The proteasome is responsible for selective degradation of most cellular proteins. Abundantly present in the cell, proteasomes not only diffuse in the cytoplasm and the... (Review)
Review
The proteasome is responsible for selective degradation of most cellular proteins. Abundantly present in the cell, proteasomes not only diffuse in the cytoplasm and the nucleus but also associate with the chromatin, cytoskeleton, various membranes and membraneless organelles/condensates. How and why the proteasome gets to these specific subcellular compartments remains poorly understood, although increasing evidence supports the hypothesis that intracellular localization may have profound impacts on the activity, substrate accessibility and stability/integrity of the proteasome. In this short review, I summarize recent advances on the functions, regulations and targeting mechanisms of proteasomes, especially those localized to the nuclear condensates and membrane structures of the cell, and I discuss the biological significance thereof in mediating compartmentalized protein degradation.
Topics: Cell Nucleus; Cytoplasm; Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex; Proteins; Proteolysis
PubMed: 35204730
DOI: 10.3390/biom12020229