-
Annals of Translational Medicine Aug 2019Ultrasonography is a safe, efficient and cost-effective mode of imaging that can assist clinicians with important treatment decisions and provide procedural guidance.... (Review)
Review
Ultrasonography is a safe, efficient and cost-effective mode of imaging that can assist clinicians with important treatment decisions and provide procedural guidance. Today, point of care ultrasound plays an essential role in the assessment of benign and malignant conditions of chest, both in the outpatient and inpatient setting. Small, ultra-portable, affordable units can now be carried in the coat pocket. Advanced lung cancer, metastatic diseases to the lungs or thoracic malignancies can present with pleural effusion, pulmonary edema, post-obstructive pneumonia, or ascites that can be assessed by the clinician with ultrasound. It can be used to evaluate the extent of thoracic tumors beyond the parenchyma to the parietal pleura or chest wall, assess cervical, supraclavicular lymphadenopathy prior to fine needle aspiration or to determine venous thromboembolism (VTE) associated with malignancy. Thoracic ultrasound is currently being practiced by the pulmonologists, thoracic surgeons and intensivists to provide guidance during placement of pleural catheters, chest tubes or to evaluate the pleural cavity before thoracoscopy. Point of care ultrasound can improve efficiency in procedures by decreasing complications, increasing success and reducing financial strain on the health care system.
PubMed: 31516896
DOI: 10.21037/atm.2019.05.53 -
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory... Apr 2023Identifying the cause of pleural effusion is challenging for pulmonologists. Imaging, biopsy, microbiology and biochemical analyses are routinely used for diagnosing... (Review)
Review
Identifying the cause of pleural effusion is challenging for pulmonologists. Imaging, biopsy, microbiology and biochemical analyses are routinely used for diagnosing pleural effusion. Among these diagnostic tools, biochemical analyses are promising because they have the advantages of low cost, minimal invasiveness, observer independence and short turn-around time. Here, we reviewed the past, present and future of pleural fluid biochemical analysis. We reviewed the history of Light's criteria and its modifications and the current status of biomarkers for heart failure, malignant pleural effusion, tuberculosis pleural effusion and parapneumonic pleural effusion. In addition, we anticipate the future of pleural fluid biochemical analysis, including the utility of machine learning, molecular diagnosis and high-throughput technologies. () should address the topic of pleural fluid biochemical analysis in the future to promote specific knowledge in the laboratory professional community.
Topics: Humans; Exudates and Transudates; Pleural Effusion; Pleural Effusion, Malignant; Heart Failure; Biomarkers
PubMed: 36383033
DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2022-0844 -
Cureus Apr 2022Percutaneous tracheostomy is a bedside surgical procedure that creates an opening in the anterior tracheal wall. Tracheostomy is performed in patients expected to... (Review)
Review
Percutaneous tracheostomy is a bedside surgical procedure that creates an opening in the anterior tracheal wall. Tracheostomy is performed in patients expected to require mechanical ventilation for longer than seven to 10 days. This bedside percutaneous tracheostomy has been used since the late 1990s. Tracheotomy tubes are of various kinds like cuffed vs. uncuffed, fenestrated vs. unfenestrated, single lumen vs. double lumen, and metal vs. plastic. Its indications are categorized into emergency vs. elective. The most common emergency indication is acute airway obstruction, and the elective indication is prolonged intubation. There is no absolute contraindication, but a physician should consider severe hypoxia requiring high oxygen and coagulopathy. Percutaneous tracheostomy is a new technique requiring different skills. Advantages of percutaneous tracheostomy are as follows - it is performed at the bedside, procedural time is less, the cost is less, does not need operating schedule time. Percutaneous tracheostomy is generally performed by otolaryngologists, general surgeons, interventional pulmonologists, thoracic surgeons, or intensivists.
PubMed: 35573523
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.24083 -
Clinical Medicine & Research Jun 2023Burnout syndrome is common in physicians, but little is known about burnout in lung transplant physicians specifically. The purpose of this study was to explore burnout...
Burnout syndrome is common in physicians, but little is known about burnout in lung transplant physicians specifically. The purpose of this study was to explore burnout and its relationship to job factors and depression in lung transplant physicians. A cross-sectional study that included lung transplant pulmonologists and surgeons was performed via electronic survey. The lung transplant physicians surveyed practiced worldwide. The survey incorporated questions about demographics and job characteristics as well as the Maslach Burnout Inventory and Patient Health Questionnaire-2. Burnout was defined by high emotional exhaustion or depersonalization. Ninety physicians worldwide completed the survey. Of the 90 physicians who completed the entire survey, 44 (48.9%) had burnout with 38 (42.2%) having high emotional exhaustion, 15 (16.7%) having high depersonalization, and 9 (10.0%) with both. Of the respondents, 14 (15.6%) had high risk of depression, and of these, 13 also had high emotional exhaustion. There was a positive correlation between depression score and emotional exhaustion score (=0.67, <0.001). Depression was more common in surgeons compared with pulmonologists (35.7% versus 11.8%, =0.02). There was a trend toward more burnout by emotional exhaustion in physicians with more versus less work experience (68.4% versus 31.6%, =0.056). Emotional exhaustion is common in lung transplant physicians and is associated with depression and a negative impact on life.
Topics: Humans; Cross-Sectional Studies; Depersonalization; Burnout, Psychological; Burnout, Professional; Surveys and Questionnaires; Surgeons
PubMed: 37407217
DOI: 10.3121/cmr.2023.1809 -
Journal of Thoracic Disease Aug 2021During the last decade, there has been a tremendous effort towards making procedures less invasive, which could reduce complications, decrease hospital stay and minimize... (Review)
Review
During the last decade, there has been a tremendous effort towards making procedures less invasive, which could reduce complications, decrease hospital stay and minimize overall health care cost. Medical thoracoscopy (MT) or pleuroscopy is a minimally invasive procedure commonly performed by interventional pulmonologist in United States. It has a favorable safety profile allowing access to the pleural cavity with a thoracoscope via a small chest wall incision to perform diagnostic or therapeutic interventions under direct visualization. MT allows the physician to perform pleural biopsy with high accuracy, drain loculated pleural effusion, guide chest tube placement and perform pleurodesis. As compared to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), MT is less invasive, does not require single lung ventilation, has a comparable diagnostic yield, and better tolerated in high-risk patients. MT can also be performed at bedside in critically ill patients. Although MT is generally safe, a multi-disciplinary discussion between the interventional pulmonologist, intensive care team, anesthesiologist and thoracic team is necessary to ensure best clinical practice as well as minimize complications for such high-risk patients. The purpose of this article is to review technique, diagnostic and therapeutic indications, as well as contraindications of performing bedside MT in intensive care unit. It aims to review both advantages and limitations of performing MT in intensive care unit.
PubMed: 34527362
DOI: 10.21037/jtd-2019-ipicu-02 -
Panminerva Medica Sep 2019In clinical practice, interventional pulmonologists face several situations which can lead to dramatic consequences especially regarding ventilation and require... (Review)
Review
In clinical practice, interventional pulmonologists face several situations which can lead to dramatic consequences especially regarding ventilation and require immediate intervention. We describe the main pathological conditions where an urgent bronchoscopy is crucial because they act through mechanisms such as airway obstructions or alteration of the anatomic integrity of the tracheobronchial tree. We point out the problems resulting from inhalation of foreign bodies, one of the most dramatic respiratory emergencies typical in childhood which needs not only the appropriate endoscopic equipment suitable for the age, but also great experience in the management of the possible related complications. Massive hemoptysis is then discussed in order to help to choose the right endoscope and to clarify the steps requested to face this dramatic event. Lastly, iatrogenic tracheal injuries are described, in spite of their low occurrence. The correct endoscopic assessment of the lesions enables to select the proper multidisciplinary therapeutic approach together with surgeons and anesthetists. Due to their peculiarities, emergencies do not allow classic training so it is difficult to estimate the procedure volume necessary to achieve an adequate endoscopic experience. We think, in this field, it is advisable to refer to numbers proposed for elections endoscopic procedures. For these reasons, we consider desirable the use of simulators and clinic case discussions during interventional pulmonologist's training.
Topics: Bronchoscopes; Bronchoscopy; Clinical Competence; Emergencies; Emergency Medicine; Endoscopy; Foreign Bodies; Foreign-Body Reaction; Hemoptysis; Humans; Inhalation; Pulmonary Medicine; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 30303356
DOI: 10.23736/S0031-0808.18.03543-7 -
Annals of Medicine Dec 2023The coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) increased the already heavy workload in the pulmonary and respiratory departments, which therefore possibly increased the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
The coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) increased the already heavy workload in the pulmonary and respiratory departments, which therefore possibly increased the prevalence of burnout among pulmonologists or respiratory therapists. We aimed to compare the differences in burnout among pulmonologists or respiratory therapists pre- and post-COVID-19 by doing a systematic review with meta-analysis.
METHODS
We searched pulmonologist, or pulmonary, or respiratory, and burnout up to 29 January 2023 in six databases. We included studies investigating pulmonologists or respiratory therapists and reporting the prevalence of burnout among them. The risk of bias was assessed by a tool for prevalence studies. The overall prevalence of burnout was pooled.
RESULTS
A total of 2859 records were identified and 16 studies were included in the final analysis. The included studies reported 3610 responding individuals and 2336 burnouts. The pooled prevalence of burnout was 61.7% (95% confidence interval (CI), 48.6-73.2%; = 96.3%). The pooled prevalence of burnout during COVID-19 was significantly higher than it was prior to the outbreak (68.4% vs. 41.6%, = .01). The result of the meta-regression revealed that COVID-19 coverage was significantly associated with the prevalence of burnout ( = .04).
CONCLUSIONS
Burnout was widely prevalent among pulmonologists or respiratory therapists and increasingly perceived during COVID-19. Therefore, interventions were needed to reduce burnout in this specialty.KEY MESSASGESThe coronavirus disease-19 increased the already heavy workload in the pulmonary and respiratory departments.Burnout was widely prevalent among pulmonologists or respiratory therapists and increasingly perceived during COVID-19.
Topics: Humans; COVID-19; Pulmonologists; Prevalence; Burnout, Professional; Burnout, Psychological
PubMed: 37459584
DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2234392 -
The European Respiratory Journal May 2023Few studies have investigated the collaborative potential between artificial intelligence (AI) and pulmonologists for diagnosing pulmonary disease. We hypothesised that...
BACKGROUND
Few studies have investigated the collaborative potential between artificial intelligence (AI) and pulmonologists for diagnosing pulmonary disease. We hypothesised that the collaboration between a pulmonologist and AI with explanations (explainable AI (XAI)) is superior in diagnostic interpretation of pulmonary function tests (PFTs) than the pulmonologist without support.
METHODS
The study was conducted in two phases, a monocentre study (phase 1) and a multicentre intervention study (phase 2). Each phase utilised two different sets of 24 PFT reports of patients with a clinically validated gold standard diagnosis. Each PFT was interpreted without (control) and with XAI's suggestions (intervention). Pulmonologists provided a differential diagnosis consisting of a preferential diagnosis and optionally up to three additional diagnoses. The primary end-point compared accuracy of preferential and additional diagnoses between control and intervention. Secondary end-points were the number of diagnoses in differential diagnosis, diagnostic confidence and inter-rater agreement. We also analysed how XAI influenced pulmonologists' decisions.
RESULTS
In phase 1 (n=16 pulmonologists), mean preferential and differential diagnostic accuracy significantly increased by 10.4% and 9.4%, respectively, between control and intervention (p<0.001). Improvements were somewhat lower but highly significant (p<0.0001) in phase 2 (5.4% and 8.7%, respectively; n=62 pulmonologists). In both phases, the number of diagnoses in the differential diagnosis did not reduce, but diagnostic confidence and inter-rater agreement significantly increased during intervention. Pulmonologists updated their decisions with XAI's feedback and consistently improved their baseline performance if AI provided correct predictions.
CONCLUSION
A collaboration between a pulmonologist and XAI is better at interpreting PFTs than individual pulmonologists reading without XAI support or XAI alone.
Topics: Humans; Artificial Intelligence; Pulmonologists; Respiratory Function Tests; Lung Diseases
PubMed: 37080566
DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01720-2022 -
Chest Oct 2023Climate change adversely impacts global health. Increasingly, temperature variability, inclement weather, declining air quality, and growing food and clean water supply... (Review)
Review
Climate change adversely impacts global health. Increasingly, temperature variability, inclement weather, declining air quality, and growing food and clean water supply insecurities threaten human health. Earth's temperature is projected to increase up to 6.4 °C by the end of the 21st century, exacerbating the threat. Public and health care professionals, including pulmonologists, perceive the detrimental effects of climate change and air pollution and support efforts to mitigate its effects. In fact, evidence is strong that premature cardiopulmonary death is associated with air pollution exposure via inhalation through the respiratory system, which functions as a portal of entry. However, little guidance is available for pulmonologists in recognizing the effects of climate change and air pollution on the diverse range of pulmonary disorders. To educate and mitigate risk for patients competently, pulmonologists must be armed with evidence-based findings of the impact of climate change and air pollution on specific pulmonary diseases. Our goal is to provide pulmonologists with the background and tools to improve patients' health and to prevent adverse outcomes despite climate change-imposed threats. In this review, we detail current evidence of climate change and air pollution impact on a diverse range of pulmonary disorders. Knowledge enables a proactive and individualized approach toward prevention strategies for patients, rather than merely treating ailments reactively.
Topics: Humans; Air Pollutants; Air Pollution; Allergens; Climate Change; Pulmonologists; Lung Diseases
PubMed: 37054776
DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2023.04.009 -
Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia :... Sep 2020
Topics: Diaphragm; Humans; Pulmonologists; Ultrasonography
PubMed: 32965297
DOI: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20200367