-
RNA Biology Oct 2021Ribosomes are essential nanomachines responsible for all protein production in cells. Ribosome biogenesis and function are energy costly processes, they are tightly... (Review)
Review
Ribosomes are essential nanomachines responsible for all protein production in cells. Ribosome biogenesis and function are energy costly processes, they are tightly regulated to match cellular needs. In cancer, major pathways that control ribosome biogenesis and function are often deregulated to ensure cell survival and to accommodate the continuous proliferation of tumour cells. Ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs) are abundantly modified with 2'-O-methylation (Nm, ribomethylation) being one of the most common modifications. In eukaryotic ribosomes, ribomethylation is performed by the methyltransferase Fibrillarin guided by box C/D small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs). Accumulating evidences indicate that snoRNA expression and ribosome methylation profiles are altered in cancer. Here we review our current knowledge on differential snoRNA expression and rRNA 2'-O methylation in the context of human malignancies, and discuss the consequences and opportunities for cancer diagnostics, prognostics, and therapeutics.
Topics: Animals; Humans; Methylation; Neoplasms; RNA Processing, Post-Transcriptional; RNA, Ribosomal; RNA, Small Nucleolar; Ribosomes
PubMed: 34775914
DOI: 10.1080/15476286.2021.1991167 -
Current Biology : CB Jun 2022Cell growth relies upon the ability to produce new proteins, which requires energy and chemical precursors, and an adequate supply of the molecular machines for protein...
Cell growth relies upon the ability to produce new proteins, which requires energy and chemical precursors, and an adequate supply of the molecular machines for protein synthesis - ribosomes. Although not widely appreciated, ribosomes are remarkably abundant in all cells. For example, in a rapidly growing yeast cell there are ∼2-4 x 10 ribosomes, produced and exported to the cytoplasm at a rate of ∼2,000-4,000 per minute, with ribosomal proteins making up ∼50% of total cellular protein number and ∼30% of cellular protein mass. Even in a typical human cell ribosomal proteins constitute ∼4-6% of total protein mass, and ribosomes are present at ∼10 per cell. We begin this primer by exploring the tight relationship between ribosome production and cell growth, which has important implications not just for the cell's global protein expression profile and maximum growth rate, but also for the molecular composition of the ribosome itself. We then discuss how and to what extent the expression of the RNA and protein components of ribosomes is fine-tuned to match the cell's needs and minimise waste. Finally, we highlight the importance of coordinated ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and ribosomal protein expression in eukaryotes and explore how defects in this process are associated with proteotoxicity and disease. A central underlying question addressed throughout is whether regulation of ribosome biogenesis has evolved to optimise energy efficiency or is instead (or in addition) driven by other goals, such as maximising cell growth rate, promoting adaptation to changing environmental conditions, or maintaining the stability of the cellular proteome.
Topics: Cell Cycle; Humans; Protein Biosynthesis; RNA, Ribosomal; Ribosomal Proteins; Ribosomes; Saccharomyces cerevisiae
PubMed: 35728540
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.04.083 -
RNA Biology Jan 2022Eukaryotic ribosome biogenesis involves the synthesis of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and its stepwise folding into the unique structure present in mature ribosomes. rRNA... (Review)
Review
Eukaryotic ribosome biogenesis involves the synthesis of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and its stepwise folding into the unique structure present in mature ribosomes. rRNA folding starts already co-transcriptionally in the nucleolus and continues when pre-ribosomal particles further maturate in the nucleolus and upon their transit to the nucleoplasm and cytoplasm. While the approximate order of folding of rRNA subdomains is known, especially from cryo-EM structures of pre-ribosomal particles, the actual mechanisms of rRNA folding are less well understood. Both small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) and proteins have been implicated in rRNA folding. snoRNAs hybridize to precursor rRNAs (pre-rRNAs) and thereby prevent premature folding of the respective rRNA elements. Ribosomal proteins (r-proteins) and ribosome assembly factors might have a similar function by binding to rRNA elements and preventing their premature folding. Besides that, a small group of ribosome assembly factors are thought to play a more active role in rRNA folding. In particular, multiple RNA helicases participate in individual ribosome assembly steps, where they are believed to coordinate RNA folding/unfolding events or the release of proteins from the rRNA. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on mechanisms of RNA folding and on the specific function of the individual RNA helicases involved. As the yeast is the organism in which ribosome biogenesis and the role of RNA helicases in this process is best studied, we focused our review on insights from this model organism, but also make comparisons to other organisms where applicable.
Topics: RNA Folding; RNA Helicases; RNA Precursors; RNA, Ribosomal; RNA, Small Nucleolar; Ribosomal Proteins; Ribosomes; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins
PubMed: 35678541
DOI: 10.1080/15476286.2022.2079890 -
Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton,... 2022Ribosomes are universally conserved ribonucleoprotein complexes involved in the decoding of the genetic information contained in messenger RNAs into proteins.... (Review)
Review
Ribosomes are universally conserved ribonucleoprotein complexes involved in the decoding of the genetic information contained in messenger RNAs into proteins. Accordingly, ribosome biogenesis is a fundamental cellular process required for functional ribosome homeostasis and to preserve satisfactory gene expression capability.Although the ribosome is universally conserved, its biogenesis shows an intriguing degree of variability across the tree of life . These differences also raise yet unresolved questions. Among them are (a) what are, if existing, the remaining ancestral common principles of ribosome biogenesis ; (b) what are the molecular impacts of the evolution history and how did they contribute to (re)shape the ribosome biogenesis pathway across the tree of life ; (c) what is the extent of functional divergence and/or convergence (functional mimicry), and in the latter case (if existing) what is the molecular basis; (d) considering the universal ribosome conservation, what is the capability of functional plasticity and cellular adaptation of the ribosome biogenesis pathway?In this review, we provide a brief overview of ribosome biogenesis across the tree of life and try to illustrate some potential and/or emerging answers to these unresolved questions.
Topics: RNA, Messenger; RNA, Ribosomal; Ribosomes
PubMed: 35796979
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2501-9_1 -
Science Advances Jun 2023Stem cells in many systems, including germline stem cells (GSCs), increase ribosome biogenesis and translation during terminal differentiation. Here, we show that the...
Stem cells in many systems, including germline stem cells (GSCs), increase ribosome biogenesis and translation during terminal differentiation. Here, we show that the H/ACA small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP) complex that promotes pseudouridylation of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and ribosome biogenesis is required for oocyte specification. Reducing ribosome levels during differentiation decreased the translation of a subset of messenger RNAs that are enriched for CAG trinucleotide repeats and encode polyglutamine-containing proteins, including differentiation factors such as RNA-binding Fox protein 1. Moreover, ribosomes were enriched at CAG repeats within transcripts during oogenesis. Increasing target of rapamycin (TOR) activity to elevate ribosome levels in H/ACA snRNP complex-depleted germlines suppressed the GSC differentiation defects, whereas germlines treated with the TOR inhibitor rapamycin had reduced levels of polyglutamine-containing proteins. Thus, ribosome biogenesis and ribosome levels can control stem cell differentiation via selective translation of CAG repeat-containing transcripts.
Topics: Ribonucleoproteins, Small Nuclear; Ribosomes; RNA, Ribosomal; Proteins; Sirolimus
PubMed: 37343092
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.ade5492 -
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology Dec 2022Translation modulates the timing and amplification of gene expression after transcription. Brain development requires uniquely complex gene expression patterns, but...
Translation modulates the timing and amplification of gene expression after transcription. Brain development requires uniquely complex gene expression patterns, but large-scale measurements of translation directly in the prenatal brain are lacking. We measure the reactants, synthesis and products of mRNA translation spanning mouse neocortex neurogenesis, and discover a transient window of dynamic regulation at mid-gestation. Timed translation upregulation of chromatin-binding proteins like Satb2, which is essential for neuronal subtype differentiation, restricts protein expression in neuronal lineages despite broad transcriptional priming in progenitors. In contrast, translation downregulation of ribosomal proteins sharply decreases ribosome biogenesis, coinciding with a major shift in protein synthesis dynamics at mid-gestation. Changing activity of eIF4EBP1, a direct inhibitor of ribosome biogenesis, is concurrent with ribosome downregulation and affects neurogenesis of the Satb2 lineage. Thus, the molecular logic of brain development includes the refinement of transcriptional programs by translation. Modeling of the developmental neocortex translatome is provided as an open-source searchable resource at https://shiny.mdc-berlin.de/cortexomics .
Topics: Mice; Animals; Protein Biosynthesis; Ribosomes; Ribosomal Proteins; Codon; Brain
PubMed: 36482253
DOI: 10.1038/s41594-022-00882-9 -
International Journal of Molecular... Feb 2020The eukaryotic proteome has to be precisely regulated at multiple levels of gene expression, from transcription, translation, and degradation of RNA and protein to... (Review)
Review
The eukaryotic proteome has to be precisely regulated at multiple levels of gene expression, from transcription, translation, and degradation of RNA and protein to adjust to several cellular conditions. Particularly at the translational level, regulation is controlled by a variety of RNA binding proteins, translation and associated factors, numerous enzymes, and by post-translational modifications (PTM). Ubiquitination, a prominent PTM discovered as the signal for protein degradation, has newly emerged as a modulator of protein synthesis by controlling several processes in translation. Advances in proteomics and cryo-electron microscopy have identified ubiquitin modifications of several ribosomal proteins and provided numerous insights on how this modification affects ribosome structure and function. The variety of pathways and functions of translation controlled by ubiquitin are determined by the various enzymes involved in ubiquitin conjugation and removal, by the ubiquitin chain type used, by the target sites of ubiquitination, and by the physiologic signals triggering its accumulation. Current research is now elucidating multiple ubiquitin-mediated mechanisms of translational control, including ribosome biogenesis, ribosome degradation, ribosome-associated protein quality control (RQC), and redox control of translation by ubiquitin (RTU). This review discusses the central role of ubiquitin in modulating the dynamism of the cellular proteome and explores the molecular aspects responsible for the expanding puzzle of ubiquitin signals and functions in translation.
Topics: Animals; Humans; Models, Molecular; Oxidative Stress; Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex; Protein Biosynthesis; Proteolysis; RNA Stability; Ribosomal Proteins; Ribosomes; Ubiquitin; Ubiquitination
PubMed: 32050486
DOI: 10.3390/ijms21031151 -
International Journal of Molecular... Apr 2021Ubiquitin is a small protein that is highly conserved throughout eukaryotes. It operates as a reversible post-translational modifier through a process known as... (Review)
Review
Ubiquitin is a small protein that is highly conserved throughout eukaryotes. It operates as a reversible post-translational modifier through a process known as ubiquitination, which involves the addition of one or several ubiquitin moieties to a substrate protein. These modifications mark proteins for proteasome-dependent degradation or alter their localization or activity in a variety of cellular processes. In most eukaryotes, ubiquitin is generated by the proteolytic cleavage of precursor proteins in which it is fused either to itself, constituting a polyubiquitin precursor, or as a single N-terminal moiety to ribosomal proteins, which are practically invariably eL40 and eS31. Herein, we summarize the contribution of the ubiquitin moiety within precursors of ribosomal proteins to ribosome biogenesis and function and discuss the biological relevance of having maintained the explicit fusion to eL40 and eS31 during evolution. There are other ubiquitin-like proteins, which also work as post-translational modifiers, among them the small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO). Both ubiquitin and SUMO are able to modify ribosome assembly factors and ribosomal proteins to regulate ribosome biogenesis and function. Strikingly, ubiquitin-like domains are also found within two ribosome assembly factors; hence, the functional role of these proteins will also be highlighted.
Topics: Animals; Humans; Protein Processing, Post-Translational; Ribosomal Proteins; Ribosomes; Ubiquitin; Ubiquitination; Ubiquitins
PubMed: 33921964
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22094359 -
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. RNA Nov 2021Eukaryotic gene expression is closely regulated by translation and turnover of mRNAs. Recent advances highlight the importance of translation in the control of mRNA... (Review)
Review
Eukaryotic gene expression is closely regulated by translation and turnover of mRNAs. Recent advances highlight the importance of translation in the control of mRNA degradation, both for aberrant and apparently normal mRNAs. During translation, the information contained in mRNAs is decoded by ribosomes, one codon at a time, and tRNAs, by specifically recognizing codons, translate the nucleotide code into amino acids. Such a decoding step does not process regularly, with various obstacles that can hinder ribosome progression, then leading to ribosome stalling or collisions. The progression of ribosomes is constantly monitored by the cell which has evolved several translation-dependent mRNA surveillance pathways, including nonsense-mediated decay (NMD), no-go decay (NGD), and non-stop decay (NSD), to degrade certain problematic mRNAs and the incomplete protein products. Recent progress in sequencing and ribosome profiling has made it possible to discover new mechanisms controlling ribosome dynamics, with numerous crosstalks between translation and mRNA decay. We discuss here various translation features critical for mRNA decay, with particular focus on current insights from the complexity of the genetic code and also the emerging role for the ribosome as a regulatory hub orchestrating mRNA decay, quality control, and stress signaling. Even if the interplay between mRNA translation and degradation is no longer to be demonstrated, a better understanding of their precise coordination is worthy of further investigation. This article is categorized under: RNA Turnover and Surveillance > Regulation of RNA Stability Translation > Translation Regulation RNA Interactions with Proteins and Other Molecules > RNA-Protein Complexes.
Topics: Nonsense Mediated mRNA Decay; Protein Biosynthesis; RNA Stability; RNA, Messenger; Ribosomes
PubMed: 33949788
DOI: 10.1002/wrna.1658 -
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences :... Aug 2021Cancer cachexia afflicts many advanced cancer patients with many progressing to death. While there have been many advancements in understanding the molecular mechanisms... (Review)
Review
Cancer cachexia afflicts many advanced cancer patients with many progressing to death. While there have been many advancements in understanding the molecular mechanisms that contribute to the development of cancer cachexia, substantial gaps still exist. Chemotherapy drugs often target ribosome biogenesis to slow or blunt tumor cell growth and proliferation. Some of the most frequent side-effects of chemotherapy are loss of skeletal muscle mass, muscular strength and an increase in fatigue. Given that ribosome biogenesis has emerged as a main mechanism regulating muscle hypertrophy, and more recently, also implicated in muscle atrophy, we propose that some chemotherapy drugs can cause further muscle wasting via its effect on skeletal muscle cells. Many chemotherapy drugs, including the most prescribed drugs such as doxorubicin and cisplatin, affect ribosomal DNA transcription, or other pathways related to ribosome biogenesis. Furthermore, middle-aged and older individuals are the most affected population with cancer, and advanced cancer patients often show reduced levels of physical inactivity. Thus, aging and inactivity can themselves affect muscle ribosome biogenesis, which can further worsen the effect of chemotherapy on skeletal muscle ribosome biogenesis and, ultimately, muscle mass and function. We propose that chemotherapy can accelerate the onset or worsen cancer cachexia via its inhibitory effects on skeletal muscle ribosome biogenesis. We end our review by providing recommendations that could be used to ameliorate the negative effects of chemotherapy on skeletal muscle ribosome biogenesis.
Topics: Aging; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Cachexia; Humans; Muscle, Skeletal; Neoplasms; Organelle Biogenesis; Ribosomes
PubMed: 34196731
DOI: 10.1007/s00018-021-03888-6