-
Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) Jul 2022Successful implementation of deprescribing requires exploring healthcare professionals’ opinions, preferences, and attitudes towards deprescribing. The aim of this...
Successful implementation of deprescribing requires exploring healthcare professionals’ opinions, preferences, and attitudes towards deprescribing. The aim of this study was to develop and validate the questionnaire exploring healthcare providers’ opinions preferences and attitudes towards deprescribing (CHOPPED questionnaire). This was a cross-sectional on-line survey. A comprehensive 58-item questionnaire, in two versions (for pharmacists and physicians), was developed through an extensive literature review and interviews with experts. The questionnaire was validated, and its reliability was assessed through data collected from 356 pharmacists and 109 physicians. Exploratory factor analysis was performed, and 37- and 35-item questionnaires were developed. Ten factors were identified: knowledge, awareness, patient barriers and facilitators, competencies barriers and facilitators, collaboration barriers and facilitators, and healthcare system barriers and facilitators. The CHOPPED tool has satisfactory face, content (CVR > 0.62) (content validity ratio), construct, and criterion validity. The reliability statistics of all factors in both versions was acceptable with Cronbach’s alpha > 0.6. Test−retest reliability analysis showed that gamma rank correlations of total factor scores were strong and very strong (between 0.519 and 0.938). The CHOPPED tool can be used as a valid and reliable tool to explore healthcare providers’ opinions and attitudes toward discontinuing medications in the primary care setting in Croatia.
PubMed: 35893715
DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy10040076 -
East Asian Archives of Psychiatry :... Dec 2019The Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised (OCI-R) is a psychometrically sound and valid self-report measure for evaluating the severity of six dimensions of...
BACKGROUND
The Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised (OCI-R) is a psychometrically sound and valid self-report measure for evaluating the severity of six dimensions of obsessive-compulsive symptoms: washing, obsessing, hoarding, ordering, checking, and neutralising. We aimed to validate the Chinese version of the OCI-R (C-OCI-R) in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) in Hong Kong.
METHODS
The C-OCI-R was forward and backward translated and reviewed by an expert panel and a focus group. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability (2-week interval) were examined. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to examine the construct validity of the C-OCI-R. Concurrent validity was examined by the correlation between the C-OCI-R and the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS), whereas divergent validity was examined by the correlation of the C-OCI-R with the Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.
RESULTS
130 OCD patients were recruited. The C-OCI-R showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.92) and test-retest reliability (Spearman's rho correlation coefficient = 0.96). The original six-factor model was supported by confirmatory factor analysis. Concurrent validity and divergent validity were established. However, the neutralising subscale may need further development, and the divergent validity of the obsessing subscale was unsatisfactory. The structure of OCD symptoms was similar in Chinese and western patients.
CONCLUSION
The C-OCI-R is a valid and reliable measure for assessing the severity of obsessive-compulsive symptoms in local Chinese patients with OCD.
Topics: Adult; Factor Analysis, Statistical; Female; Hong Kong; Humans; Language; Male; Middle Aged; Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychometrics; Reproducibility of Results; Self Report; Severity of Illness Index; Translating
PubMed: 31871306
DOI: 10.12809/eaap1832 -
Journal of Biomedical Informatics May 2021SNOMED CT Expression Constraint Language (ECL) is a declarative language developed by SNOMED International for the definition of SNOMED CT Expression Constraints (ECs)....
BACKGROUND
SNOMED CT Expression Constraint Language (ECL) is a declarative language developed by SNOMED International for the definition of SNOMED CT Expression Constraints (ECs). ECs are executable expressions that define intensional subsets of clinical meanings by stating constraints over the logic definition of concepts. The execution of an EC on some SNOMED CT substrate yields the intended subset, and it requires an execution engine able to receive an EC as input, execute it, and return the matching concepts. An important issue regarding subsets of clinical concepts is their use in terminology binding between clinical information models and terminologies for defining the set of valid values of codified data.
OBJECTIVE
To define and implement methods for the simplification, semantic validation and execution of ECs over a graph-oriented SNOMED CT database, and to provide a method for the visual representation of subsets in order to explore, understand and validate its content, as well as to develop an EC execution platform, called SNQuery, which makes use of these methods.
METHODS
Since SNOMED CT is a directed and acyclic graph, we have used a graph-oriented database to represent the content of SNOMED CT, where the schema and instances are represented as graphs and the data manipulation is expressed by graph-oriented operations. For the execution of ECs over the graph database, it is performed a translation process in which ECs are translated into a set of Cypher Query Language queries. We have defined some EC simplification methods that leverage the logic structure underlying SNOMED CT. The purpose of these methods is to reduce the complexity of ECs and, in turn, its execution time, as well as to validate them from a SNOMED CT Concept Model and logical definition points of view. We also have developed a graphic representation based on the circle packing geometrical concept, which allows validating subsets, as well as pre-defined refsets and the terminology itself.
RESULTS
We have developed SNQuery, a platform for the definition of intensional subsets of SNOMED CT concepts by means of the execution of ECs over a graph-oriented SNOMED CT database. Additionally, we have incorporated methods for the simplification and semantic validation of ECs, as well as for the visualization of subsets as a mechanism to understand and validate them. SNQuery has been evaluated in terms of EC execution times.
CONCLUSION
In this paper, we provide methods to simplify, semantically validate and execute ECs over a graph-oriented database. We also offer a method to visualize the intensional subsets obtained by executing ECs to explore, understand and validate them, as well as refsets and the terminology itself. The definition of intensional subsets is useful to bind content between clinical information models and clinical terminologies, which is a necessary step to achieve semantic interoperability between EHR systems.
Topics: Databases, Factual; Semantics; Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine; Translating
PubMed: 33753269
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103747 -
PeerJ 2022Pain is the leading cause of animal suffering, hence the importance of validated tools to ensure its appropriate evaluation and treatment. We aimed to test the...
BACKGROUND
Pain is the leading cause of animal suffering, hence the importance of validated tools to ensure its appropriate evaluation and treatment. We aimed to test the psychometric properties of the short form of the Unesp-Botucatu Feline Pain Scale (UFEPS-SF) in eight languages.
METHODS
The original scale was condensed from ten to four items. The content validation was performed by five specialists in veterinary anesthesia and analgesia. The English version of the scale was translated and back-translated into Chinese, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese and Spanish by fluent English and native speaker translators. Videos of the perioperative period of 30 cats submitted to ovariohysterectomy (preoperative, after surgery, after rescue analgesia and 24 h after surgery) were randomly evaluated twice (one-month interval) by one evaluator for each language unaware of the pain condition. After watching each video, the evaluators scored the unidimensional, UFEPS-SF and Glasgow composite multidimensional feline pain scales. Statistical analyses were carried out using R software for intra and interobserver reliability, principal component analysis, criteria concurrent and predictive validities, construct validity, item-total correlation, internal consistency, specificity, sensitivity, the definition of the intervention score for rescue analgesia and diagnostic uncertainty zone, according to the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
RESULTS
UFEPS-SF intra- and inter-observer reliability were ≥0.92 and 0.84, respectively, for all observers. According to the principal component analysis, UFEPS-SF is a unidimensional scale. Concurrent criterion validity was confirmed by the high correlation between UFEPS-SF and all other scales (≥0.9). The total score and all items of UFEPS-SF increased after surgery (pain), decreased to baseline after analgesia and were intermediate at 24 h after surgery (moderate pain), confirming responsiveness and construct validity. Item total correlation of each item (0.68-0.83) confirmed that the items contributed homogeneously to the total score. Internal consistency was excellent (≥0.9) for all items. Both specificity (baseline) and sensitivity (after surgery) based on the Youden index was 99% (97-100%). The suggestive cut-off score for the administration of analgesia according to the ROC curve was ≥4 out of 12. The diagnostic uncertainty zone ranged from 3 to 4. The area under the curve of 0.99 indicated excellent discriminatory capacity of UFEPS-SF.
CONCLUSIONS
The UFEPS-SF and its items, assessed by experienced evaluators, demonstrated very good repeatability and reproducibility, content, criterion and construct validities, item-total correlation, internal consistency, excellent sensitivity and specificity and a cut-off point indicating the need for rescue analgesia in Chinese, French, English, German, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese and Spanish.
Topics: Cats; Animals; Reproducibility of Results; Pain, Postoperative; Analgesia; Language; Translating
PubMed: 35345592
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13134 -
Journal of Patient-reported Outcomes Sep 2022This study aimed to translate and validate an Arabic version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Head and Neck Scale (FACT-H&N, v-4) for use among Sudanese...
BACKGROUND
This study aimed to translate and validate an Arabic version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Head and Neck Scale (FACT-H&N, v-4) for use among Sudanese oral cancer patients.
METHODS
The instrument underwent translation and validation following the standard FACT translation methodology. The translated instrument was pre-tested for face validity and content validity using semi-structured, in-depth interviews with ten oral cancer patients to assess acceptability. The questionnaire was pilot tested with 60 patients; reliability was tested for internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha while construct validity was tested using 'known-group validity'.
RESULTS
The pre-test study revealed no major issues, apart from a reluctance to answer questions on sexual satisfaction. The FACT-H&N demonstrated good internal consistency, it considered five particular constructs: PWB, SWB, EWB, FWB and FACT-H&N, their Cronbach's α values were positive and close to 1 with values of 0.85, 0.788, 0.86, 0.895 and 0.703 respectively, indicating that the questionnaire was valid and the responses consistent. Sixty patients were asked the global health-related quality of life item, 36.3% rated their QOL as very good or good (36.3%), while 41.7% rated it as average, and 21.7% as poor or very poor. Then FACT subscale mean scores were tabulated against three categories; patients with very poor/poor recorded significantly lower scores indicating construct validity. Some psychometric properties were consistent with other FACT-H&N translations such as the Chinese, French, Pakistani and Malaysian.
CONCLUSIONS
This study validates the Arabic version of the FACT-H&N. It is a reliable tool and, will assist further QoL research in other Arabic-speaking countries.
PubMed: 36114352
DOI: 10.1186/s41687-022-00507-1 -
BMC Psychology Dec 2022Cancer-related cognitive impairment is a common and potentially debilitating symptom experienced by patients with non-central nervous system (CNS) cancers, with negative...
BACKGROUND
Cancer-related cognitive impairment is a common and potentially debilitating symptom experienced by patients with non-central nervous system (CNS) cancers, with negative impact on their quality of life. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function-Version 3 (FACT-Cog-v3) is the most extensively used instrument specifically developed to evaluate cognitive complaints in adult cancer patients. Nevertheless, this self-report measure is not yet validated for the Portuguese population. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the FACT-Cog-v3 among patients with non-CNS cancers in Portugal.
METHODS
The validation study was conducted based on a convenience sample of 281 patients with non-CNS cancers, aged between 18 and 65 years, recruited online. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to test the factor structure of the Portuguese FACT-Cog-v3 version; internal consistency analysis was also conducted. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30-version 3) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) were also used to test the concurrent, convergent, and discriminant validity of the scale.
RESULTS
CFA supported a four-factor model with good fix indexes and internal consistencies: perceived cognitive impairments (α = 0.97), comments from others (α = 0.92), perceived cognitive abilities (α = 0.93), and impact on quality of life (α = 0.92). Concurrent, convergent, and discriminant validities were confirmed. Moderate and strong correlations were found between the FACT-Cog-v3 subscales and the QLQ-C30 cognitive functioning subscale. Good convergent validity, with moderate correlations, was found between the FACT-Cog-v3 subscales and the HADS-A, HADS-D, and QLQ-C30 fatigue, sleep disturbance, and global health status subscales. Acceptable discriminant validity, with weak and moderate correlations, was demonstrated between the FACT-Cog-v3 subscales and the QLQ-C30 pain and nausea/vomiting subscales.
CONCLUSIONS
The Portuguese FACT-Cog-v3 version can be considered a reliable and valid measure to assess cognitive concerns of patients with non-CNS cancers, with relevance for research and clinical practice.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Adolescent; Young Adult; Middle Aged; Aged; Quality of Life; Surveys and Questionnaires; Portugal; Psychometrics; Cognition; Reproducibility of Results; Neoplasms
PubMed: 36517827
DOI: 10.1186/s40359-022-01018-w -
Frontiers in Psychology 2022With the COVID-19 pandemic, remote work was increased all over the globe. As a consequence, workers had to adapt their communication behaviors to smoothly coordinate...
INTRODUCTION
With the COVID-19 pandemic, remote work was increased all over the globe. As a consequence, workers had to adapt their communication behaviors to smoothly coordinate work in their flexible teams (i.e., when team members divide work between the office and their homes). Drawing on relational coordination theory, we constructed and validated a scale to capture the most relevant team communication behaviors.
METHODS
We employed interviews and focus groups to construct the scale, refined the scale based on three samples with employees working flexibly and finally validated the scale with 130 teams from diverse organizations.
RESULTS
Our scale comprises three dimensions: focused communication, knowledge sharing and spontaneous communication. All three dimensions showed convergent validity with team planning and discriminant validity with time-spatial flexibility. Also, predictive validity with collective efficacy and team viability was achieved for focused communication and knowledge sharing. Spontaneous communication only predicted collective efficacy, but not team viability.
DISCUSSION
We conclude that the TCS is a reliable and valid measure for assessing team communication and contribute by focusing on behaviors.
PubMed: 36571047
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.961732 -
American Heart Journal Plus :... Nov 2023To develop and validate a sensitive tool for assessment of quality of life (QoL) in heart failure (HF) patients in Indian settings.
OBJECTIVE
To develop and validate a sensitive tool for assessment of quality of life (QoL) in heart failure (HF) patients in Indian settings.
METHODS
The authors conducted literature review, in depth interviews, clinical observations and designed the first draft of the QoL tool. The tool was validated using content and face validity by a panel of experts. For internal consistency reliability, the questionnaire was administered among 270 HF patients. Test-retest reliability was assessed in 20 HF patients. Principal component factor analysis with varimax rotation was employed to assess the dimensionality and to reduce the number of items. Cronbach's alpha, and Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were employed to investigate reliability of questionnaire. The responsiveness data were collected 6 months after the baseline data collection from 30 HF patients. IBM® SPSS® Statistics Version 21 was used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS
The principal component factor analysis revealed mainly 5 domains. The final tool included 25 items. Cronbach's alpha (α) for the overall tool was 0.915. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) based on test-retest was 0.734. The final tool showed good responsiveness to changes with a mean ± SD of the change in response of 46 ± 12.4 and a standardized mean response of 3.7 within six-months.
CONCLUSION
The HF specific QoL tool developed for Indian patients is a valid and reliable instrument and it can be applied in daily clinical practice, and research.
SHORT SUMMARY
We had developed and validated a quality-of-life tool for heart failure patients in India. This is the first ever attempt to develop a measure for heart failure patients in India. We had used a mixed methodology approach to identify all the domains in the tool. The newly developed tool is a valid, reliable, sensitive and responsive tool to measure quality of life in HF patients in India. This tool can be applied in daily clinical practice, research and health system for patients with HF in India.
PubMed: 38511185
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2023.100329 -
BMC Health Services Research Apr 2021In recent years, health centers in the United States have embraced the opportunity to train the next generation of health professionals. The uniqueness of the health...
BACKGROUND
In recent years, health centers in the United States have embraced the opportunity to train the next generation of health professionals. The uniqueness of the health centers as teaching settings emphasizes the need to determine if health professions training programs align with health center priorities and the nature of any adjustments that would be needed to successfully implement a training program. We sought to address this need by developing and validating a new survey that measures organizational readiness constructs important for the implementation of health professions training programs at health centers where the primary role of the organizations and individuals is healthcare delivery.
METHODS
The study incorporated several methodological steps for developing and validating a measure for assessing health center readiness to engage with health professions programs. A conceptual framework was developed based on literature review and later validated by 20 experts in two focus groups. A survey-item pool was generated and mapped to the conceptual framework and further refined and validated by 13 experts in three modified Delphi rounds. The survey items were pilot-tested with 212 health center employees. The final survey structure was derived through exploratory factor analysis. The internal consistency reliability of the scale and subscales was evaluated using Chronbach's alpha.
RESULTS
The exploratory factor analysis revealed a 41-item, 7-subscale solution for the survey structure, with 72% of total variance explained. Cronbach's alphas (.79-.97) indicated high internal consistency reliability. The survey measures: readiness to engage, evidence strength and quality of the health professions training program, relative advantage of the program, financial resources, additional resources, implementation team, and implementation plan.
CONCLUSIONS
The final survey, the Readiness to Train Assessment Tool (RTAT), is theoretically-based, valid and reliable. It provides an opportunity to evaluate health centers' readiness to implement health professions programs. When followed with appropriate change strategies, the readiness evaluations could make the implementation of health professions training programs, and their spread across the United States, more efficient and cost-effective. While developed specifically for health centers, the survey may be useful to other healthcare organizations willing to assess their readiness to implement education and training programs.
Topics: Delivery of Health Care; Factor Analysis, Statistical; Health Personnel; Humans; Reproducibility of Results; Surveys and Questionnaires; United States
PubMed: 33910561
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06406-3 -
Journal of Education and Health... 2021Ancient history mentions the dominance of men in nursing; however, now nursing has a feminine image, and globally more than 90% of nursing workforce is females....
BACKGROUND
Ancient history mentions the dominance of men in nursing; however, now nursing has a feminine image, and globally more than 90% of nursing workforce is females. Recently, more number of males are attracted to nursing, but there is a paucity of literature on the attitude of people about men in nursing may be because of a lack of measurement scales available for this purpose. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a new scale measuring attitude of people toward men in nursing.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The present study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital and used an exploratory sequential design with an instrument development model. A total of 400 participants were selected using the simple random sampling technique. The reliability, content validity, face validity, and construct validity of this newly developed scale were computed. For data analyses SPSS AMOS version 23 was used for performing exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses.
RESULTS
The new scale "AMnQ" consists of 15 items under three factors: (I) nursing is feministic and professionally low, (II) higher suitability of male nurses in technical and challenging situations, and (III) synonymy of empathy and care with a female. The final model with 15 items of AMnQ scale was validated by confirmatory factor analysis and showed a good fit to data. The Cronbach's α for the overall scale was 0.87, and for Factors I, II, and III, it was 0.80, 0.88, and 0.89, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
The "AMnQ" is a valid, reliable scale to assess the attitude of patients, nurses, physicians, and nursing students toward men in nursing. There is an assumption that nursing is a feminine profession; therefore, a valid and reliable scale to measure the attitude of people toward men in nursing will help to generate pieces of evidence on this subject, so that policymakers can make unbiased decisions on liberalizing entry of men in nursing.
PubMed: 34084801
DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_530_20