-
The Lancet. Oncology Jun 2024In the primary analysis report of the GAIA/CLL13 trial, we found that venetoclax-obinutuzumab and venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib improved undetectable measurable... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
First-line venetoclax combinations versus chemoimmunotherapy in fit patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (GAIA/CLL13): 4-year follow-up from a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.
BACKGROUND
In the primary analysis report of the GAIA/CLL13 trial, we found that venetoclax-obinutuzumab and venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib improved undetectable measurable residual disease (MRD) rates and progression-free survival compared with chemoimmunotherapy in patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. However, to our knowledge, no data on direct comparisons of different venetoclax-based combinations are available.
METHODS
GAIA/CLL13 is an open-label, randomised, phase 3 study conducted at 159 sites in ten countries in Europe and the Middle East. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, with a life expectancy of at least 6 months, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology group performance status of 0-2, a cumulative illness rating scale score of 6 or lower or a single score of 4 or lower, and no TP53 aberrations. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1), with a computer-generated list stratified by age, Binet stage, and regional study group, to either chemoimmunotherapy, venetoclax-rituximab, venetoclax-obinutuzumab, or venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib. All treatments were administered in 28-day cycles. Patients in the chemoimmunotherapy group received six cycles of treatment, with patients older than 65 years receiving intravenous bendamustine (90 mg/m, days 1-2), whereas patients aged 65 years or younger received intravenous fludarabine (25 mg/m, days 1-3) and intravenous cyclophosphamide (250 mg/m, days 1-3). Intravenous rituximab (375 mg/m, day 1 of cycle 1; 500 mg/m, day 1 of cycles 2-6) was added to chemotherapy. In the experimental groups, patients received daily venetoclax (400 mg orally) for ten cycles after a 5-week ramp-up phase starting on day 22 of cycle 1. In the venetoclax-rituximab group, intravenous rituximab (375 mg/m, day 1 of cycle 1; 500 mg/m, day 1 of cycles 2-6) was added. In the obinutuzumab-containing groups, obinutuzumab was added (cycle 1: 100 mg on day 1, 900 mg on day 2, and 1000 mg on days 8 and 15; cycles 2-6: 1000 mg on day 1). In the venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib group, daily ibrutinib (420 mg orally, from day 1 of cycle 1) was added until undetectable MRD was reached in two consecutive measurements (3 months apart) or until cycle 36. The planned treatment duration was six cycles in the chemoimmunotherapy group, 12 cycles in the venetoclax-rituximab and the venetoclax-obinutuzumab group and between 12 and 36 cycles in the venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib group. Coprimary endpoints were the undetectable MRD rate in peripheral blood at month 15 for the comparison of venetoclax-obinutuzumab versus standard chemoimmunotherapy and investigator-assessed progression-free survival for the comparison of venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib versus standard chemoimmunotherapy, both analysed in the intention-to-treat population (ie, all patients randomly assigned to treatment) with a split α of 0·025 for each coprimary endpoint. Both coprimary endpoints have been reported elsewhere. Here we report a post-hoc exploratory analysis of updated progression-free survival results after a 4-year follow-up of our study population. Safety analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02950051, recruitment is complete, and all patients are off study treatment.
FINDINGS
Between Dec 13, 2016, and Oct 13, 2019, 1080 patients were screened and 926 were randomly assigned to treatment (chemoimmunotherapy group n=229; venetoclax-rituximab group n=237; venetoclax-obinutuzumab group n=229; and venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib group n=231); mean age 60·8 years (SD 10·2), 259 (28%) of 926 patients were female, and 667 (72%) were male (data on race and ethnicity are not reported). At data cutoff for this exploratory follow-up analysis (Jan 31, 2023; median follow-up 50·7 months [IQR 44·6-57·9]), patients in the venetoclax-obinutuzumab group had significantly longer progression-free survival than those in the chemoimmunotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·47 [97·5% CI 0·32-0·69], p<0·0001) and the venetoclax-rituximab group (0·57 [0·38-0·84], p=0·0011). The venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib group also had a significantly longer progression-free survival than the chemoimmunotherapy group (0·30 [0·19-0·47]; p<0·0001) and the venetoclax-rituximab group (0·38 [0·24-0·59]; p<0·0001). There was no difference in progression-free survival between the venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib and venetoclax-obinutuzumab groups (0·63 [0·39-1·02]; p=0·031), and the proportional hazards assumption was not met for the comparison between the venetoclax-rituximab group versus the chemoimmunotherapy group (log-rank p=0·10). The estimated 4-year progression-free survival rate was 85·5% (97·5% CI 79·9-91·1; 37 [16%] events) in the venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib group, 81·8% (75·8-87·8; 55 [24%] events) in the venetoclax-obinutuzumab group, 70·1% (63·0-77·3; 84 [35%] events) in the venetoclax-rituximab group, and 62·0% (54·4-69·7; 90 [39%] events) in the chemoimmunotherapy group. The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse event was neutropenia (114 [53%] of 216 patients in the chemoimmunotherapy group, 109 [46%] of 237 in the venetoclax-rituximab group, 127 [56%] of 228 in the venetoclax-obinutuzumab group, and 112 [48%] of 231 in the venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib group). Deaths determined to be associated with study treatment by the investigator occurred in three (1%) patients in the chemoimmunotherapy group (n=1 due to each of sepsis, metastatic squamous cell carcinoma, and Richter's syndrome), none in the venetoclax-rituximab and venetoclax-obinutuzumab groups, and four (2%) in the venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib group (n=1 due to each of acute myeloid leukaemia, fungal encephalitis, small-cell lung cancer, and toxic leukoencephalopathy).
INTERPRETATION
With more than 4 years of follow-up, venetoclax-obinutuzumab and venetoclax-obinutuzumab-ibrutinib significantly extended progression-free survival compared with both chemoimmunotherapy and venetoclax-rituximab in previously untreated, fit patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, thereby supporting their use and further evaluation in this patient group, while still considering the higher toxicities observed with the triple combination.
FUNDING
AbbVie, Janssen, and F Hoffmann-La Roche.
Topics: Humans; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic; Sulfonamides; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell; Male; Female; Aged; Middle Aged; Follow-Up Studies; Piperidines; Vidarabine; Rituximab; Adenine; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Progression-Free Survival; Cyclophosphamide; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Immunotherapy; Adult
PubMed: 38821083
DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00196-7 -
The FEBS Journal Feb 2021Inositol-requiring enzyme 1 (IRE1) is a bifunctional serine/threonine kinase and endoribonuclease that is a major mediator of the unfolded protein response (UPR) during...
Inositol-requiring enzyme 1 (IRE1) is a bifunctional serine/threonine kinase and endoribonuclease that is a major mediator of the unfolded protein response (UPR) during endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. Tumour cells experience ER stress due to adverse environmental cues such as hypoxia or nutrient shortage and high metabolic/protein-folding demand. To cope with those stresses, cancer cells utilise IRE1 signalling as an adaptive mechanism. Here, we report the discovery of the FDA-approved compounds methotrexate, cefoperazone, folinic acid and fludarabine phosphate as IRE1 inhibitors. These were identified through a structural exploration of the IRE1 kinase domain using IRE1 peptide fragment docking and further optimisation and pharmacophore development. The inhibitors were verified to have an impact on IRE1 activity in vitro and were tested for their ability to sensitise human cell models of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) to chemotherapy. We show that all molecules identified sensitise glioblastoma cells to the standard-of-care chemotherapy temozolomide (TMZ).
Topics: Cefoperazone; Cell Line, Tumor; Drug Approval; Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress; Endoribonucleases; Enzyme Inhibitors; Humans; Leucovorin; Methotrexate; Molecular Structure; Peptidomimetics; Protein Binding; Protein Domains; Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases; Signal Transduction; Unfolded Protein Response; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration; Vidarabine Phosphate
PubMed: 32446294
DOI: 10.1111/febs.15372 -
Biomedicines Apr 2023Monkeypox disease (Mpox) has threatened humankind worldwide since mid-2022. The Mpox virus (MpoxV) is an example of Orthopoxviruses (OPVs), which share similar genomic... (Review)
Review
Monkeypox disease (Mpox) has threatened humankind worldwide since mid-2022. The Mpox virus (MpoxV) is an example of Orthopoxviruses (OPVs), which share similar genomic structures. A few treatments and vaccines are available for Mpox. OPV-specific VP37 protein (VP37P) is a target for developing drugs against Mpox and other OPV-induced infections such as smallpox. This review spotlights the existing and prospective VP37P inhibitors (VP37PIs) for Mpox. The non-patent literature was collected from PubMed, and the patent literature was gathered from free patent databases. Very little work has been carried out on developing VP37PIs. One VP37PI (tecovirimat) has already been approved in Europe to treat Mpox, while another drug, NIOCH-14, is under clinical trial. Developing tecovirimat/NIOCH-14-based combination therapies with clinically used drugs demonstrating activity against Mpox or other OPV infections (mitoxantrone, ofloxacin, enrofloxacin, novobiocin, cidofovir, brincidofovir, idoxuridine, trifluridine, vidarabine, fialuridine, adefovir, imatinib, and rifampicin), immunity boosters (vitamin C, zinc, thymoquinone, quercetin, ginseng, etc.), and vaccines may appear a promising strategy to fight against Mpox and other OPV infections. Drug repurposing is also a good approach for identifying clinically useful VP37PIs. The dearth in the discovery process of VP37PIs makes it an interesting area for further research. The development of the tecovirimat/NIOCH-14-based hybrid molecules with certain chemotherapeutic agents looks fruitful and can be explored to obtain new VP37PI. It would be interesting and challenging to develop an ideal VP37PI concerning its specificity, safety, and efficacy.
PubMed: 37189724
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11041106 -
Nature Communications May 2024Radiation-induced in situ tumor vaccination alone is very weak and insufficient to elicit robust antitumor immune responses. In this work, we address this issue by...
Radiation-induced in situ tumor vaccination alone is very weak and insufficient to elicit robust antitumor immune responses. In this work, we address this issue by developing chiral vidarabine monophosphate-gadolinium nanowires (aAGd-NWs) through coordination-driven self-assembly. We elucidate the mechanism of aAGd-NW assembly and characterize their distinct features, which include a negative surface charge, ultrafine topography, and right-handed chirality. Additionally, aAGd-NWs not only enhance X-ray deposition but also inhibit DNA repair, thereby enhancing radiation-induced in situ vaccination. Consequently, the in situ vaccination induced by aAGd-NWs sensitizes radiation enhances CD8 T-cell-dependent antitumor immunity and synergistically potentiates the efficacy immune checkpoint blockade therapies against both primary and metastatic tumors. The well-established aAGd-NWs exhibit exceptional therapeutic capacity and biocompatibility, offering a promising avenue for the development of radioimmunotherapy approaches.
Topics: Nanowires; Animals; Mice; Polymers; Cell Line, Tumor; Gadolinium; Mice, Inbred C57BL; CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Cancer Vaccines; Female; Humans; Vaccination; Neoplasms
PubMed: 38724527
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-48423-w -
Journal For Immunotherapy of Cancer May 2021Adoptive cell therapy with T cells genetically engineered to express a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR-T) or tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes (TIL) demonstrates... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
BACKGROUND
Adoptive cell therapy with T cells genetically engineered to express a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR-T) or tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes (TIL) demonstrates impressive clinical results in patients with cancer. Lymphodepleting preconditioning prior to cell infusion is an integral part of all adoptive T cell therapies. However, to date, there is no standardization and no data comparing different non-myeloablative (NMA) regimens.
METHODS
In this study, we compared NMA therapies with different doses of cyclophosphamide or total body irradiation (TBI) in combination with fludarabine and evaluated bone marrow suppression and recovery, cytokine serum levels, clinical response and adverse events.
RESULTS
We demonstrate that a cumulative dose of 120 mg/kg cyclophosphamide and 125 mg/m fludarabine (120Cy/125Flu) and 60Cy/125Flu preconditioning were equally efficient in achieving deep lymphopenia and neutropenia in patients with metastatic melanoma, whereas absolute lymphocyte counts (ALCs) and absolute neutrophil counts were significantly higher following 200 cGyTBI/75Flu-induced NMA. Thrombocytopenia was most profound in 120Cy/125Flu patients. 30Cy/75Flu-induced preconditioning in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia resulted in a minor ALC decrease, had no impact on platelet counts and did not yield deep neutropenia. Following cell infusion, 120Cy/125Flu patients with objective tumor response had significantly higher ALC and significant lower inflammatory indexes, such as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR). Receiver-operating characteristics curve analysis 7 days after cell infusion was performed to determine the cut-offs, which distinguish between responding and non-responding patients in the 120Cy/125Flu cohort. NLR≤1.79 and PLR≤32.7 were associated with clinical response and overall survival. Cytokine serum levels did not associate with clinical response in patients with TIL. Patients in the 120Cy/125Flu cohort developed significantly more acute NMA-related adverse events, including thrombocytopenia, febrile neutropenia and cardiotoxicity, and stayed significantly longer in hospital compared with the 60Cy/125Flu and TBI/75Flu cohorts.
CONCLUSIONS
Bone marrow depletion and recovery were equally affected by 120Cy/125Flu and 60Cy/125Flu preconditioning; however, toxicity and consequently duration of hospitalization were significantly lower in the 60Cy/125Flu cohort. Patients in the 30Cy/75Flu and TBI/75Flu groups rarely developed NMA-induced adverse events; however, both regimens were not efficient in achieving deep bone marrow suppression. Among the regimens, 60Cy/125Flu preconditioning seems to achieve maximum effect with minimum toxicity.
Topics: Adult; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Cyclophosphamide; Cytokines; Female; Humans; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Length of Stay; Lymphocyte Depletion; Male; Melanoma; Middle Aged; Myeloablative Agonists; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen; Recovery of Function; Skin Neoplasms; T-Lymphocytes; Time Factors; Transplantation Conditioning; Treatment Outcome; Vidarabine; Whole-Body Irradiation
PubMed: 33990415
DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2020-001743 -
Blood Advances Mar 2022We prospectively studied clofarabine-fludarabine-busulfan (CloFluBu)-conditioning in allogeneic hematopoietic cell therapy (HCT) for lymphoid and myeloid malignancies...
We prospectively studied clofarabine-fludarabine-busulfan (CloFluBu)-conditioning in allogeneic hematopoietic cell therapy (HCT) for lymphoid and myeloid malignancies and hypothesized that CloFluBu provides a less toxic alternative to conventional conditioning regimens, with adequate antileukemic activity. All patients receiving their first HCT, from 2011-2019, were included and received CloFluBu. The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), graft-versus-host disease (GvHD)-relapse-free survival (GRFS), treatment-related mortality (TRM), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), acute and chronic GvHD (aGvHD and cGvHD), and veno-occlusive disease (VOD). Cox proportional hazard and Fine and Gray competing-risk models were used for data analysis. One hundred fifty-five children were included: 60 acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL), 69 acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and 26 other malignancies (mostly MDS-EB). The median age was 9.7 (0.5 to 18.6) years. Estimated 2-year EFS was 72.0% ± 6.0 in ALL patients, and 62.4% ± 6.0 in AML patients. TRM in the whole cohort was 11.0% ± 2.6, incidence of aGvHD 3 to 4 at 6 months was 12.3% ± 2.7, extensive cGvHD at 2 years was 6.4% ± 2.1. Minimal residual disease-positivity prior to HCT was associated with higher CIR, both in ALL and AML. CloFluBu showed limited toxicity and encouraging EFS. CloFluBu is a potentially less toxic alternative to conventional conditioning regimens. Randomized prospective studies are needed.
Topics: Busulfan; Child; Clofarabine; Graft vs Host Disease; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Recurrence; Vidarabine
PubMed: 34781362
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005224 -
Current Allergy and Asthma Reports Nov 2019Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is an established curative treatment for children with primary immunodeficiencies. This article reviews the latest developments... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is an established curative treatment for children with primary immunodeficiencies. This article reviews the latest developments in conditioning regimens for primary immunodeficiency (PID). It focuses on data regarding transplant outcomes according to newer reduced toxicity conditioning regimens used in HCT for PID.
RECENT FINDINGS
Conventional myeloablative conditioning regimens are associated with significant acute toxicities, transplant-related mortality, and late effects such as infertility. Reduced toxicity conditioning regimens have had significant positive impacts on HCT outcome, and there are now well-established strategies in children with PID. Treosulfan has emerged as a promising preparative agent. Use of a peripheral stem cell source has been shown to be associated with better donor chimerism in patients receiving reduced toxicity conditioning. Minimal conditioning regimens using monoclonal antibodies are in clinical trials with promising results thus far. Reduced toxicity conditioning has emerged as standard of care for PID and has resulted in improved transplant survival for patients with significant comorbidities.
Topics: Busulfan; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases; Transplantation Conditioning; Vidarabine
PubMed: 31741098
DOI: 10.1007/s11882-019-0883-1 -
ChemistrySelect Dec 2022Given the rapid progression of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, an ultrafast response was urgently required to handle this major public crisis. To...
Given the rapid progression of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, an ultrafast response was urgently required to handle this major public crisis. To contain the pandemic, investments are required to develop diagnostic tests, prophylactic vaccines, and novel therapies. Lately, nucleoside analog (NA) antivirals topped the scene as top options for the treatment of COVID-19 caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections. Meanwhile, the continuous generation of new lineages of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant caused a new challenge in the persistent COVID-19 battle. Hitting the two crucial SARS-CoV-2 enzymes RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) and 3'-to-5' exoribonuclease (ExoN) collectively together using only one single ligand is a very successful new approach to stop SARS-CoV-2 multiplication and combat COVID-19 irrespective of the SARS-CoV-2 variant type because RdRps and ExoNs are broadly conserved among all SARS-CoV-2 strains. Herein, the current comprehensive study investigated most NAs libraries, searching for the most ideal drug candidates expectedly able to perfectly act through this double tactic. Gradual computational filtration gave rise to six different promising NAs, which are riboprine, forodesine, tecadenoson, nelarabine, vidarabine, and maribavir, respectively. Further biological assessment proved for the first time, using the anti-RdRp/ExoN and anti-SARS-CoV-2 bioassays, that riboprine and forodesine, among all the six tested NAs, are able to powerfully inhibit the replication of the new virulent strains of SARS-CoV-2 with extremely minute anti-RdRp and anti-SARS-CoV-2 EC values of about 0.22 and 0.49 μM for riboprine and about 0.25 and 0.73 μM for forodesine, respectively, surpassing both remdesivir and the new anti-COVID-19 drug molnupiravir. The prior data supported these biochemical findings, suggesting that riboprine and forodesine molecules strongly hit the key catalytic pockets of the SARS-CoV-2 (Omicron variant) RdRp's and ExoN's main active sites. Additionally, the ideal pharmacophoric features of riboprine and forodesine molecules render them typical dual-action inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 replication and proofreading, with their relatively flexible structures open for diverse types of chemical derivatization. In Brief, the current important results of this comprehensive study revealed the interesting repurposing potentials of, mainly, the two nucleosides riboprine and forodesine to effectively shut down the polymerase/exoribonuclease-RNA nucleotides interactions of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant and consequently treat COVID-19 infections, motivating us to rapidly begin the two drugs' broad preclinical/clinical anti-COVID-19 bioevaluations, hoping to combine both drugs soon in the COVID-19 treatment protocols.
PubMed: 36718467
DOI: 10.1002/slct.202201912 -
Annals of Hematology Jun 2022Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) and reduced toxicity conditioning (RTC) regimens enable allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) to more...
Conditioning with fludarabine and treosulfan compared to FLAMSA-RIC in allogeneic stem cell transplantation for myeloid malignancies: a retrospective single-center analysis.
Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) and reduced toxicity conditioning (RTC) regimens enable allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) to more patients due to reduction in transplant-related mortality (TRM). The conditioning regimens with fludarabine and treosulfan (Flu/Treo) or fludarabine, amsacrine, cytarabine (FLAMSA)-RIC have shown their efficacy and tolerability in various malignancies. So far, no prospective study comparing the two regimens is available. Two studies compared the regimens retrospectively, in which both provided similar outcome. In this retrospective, single-center analysis, these two regimens were compared with regard to outcome, rate of acute and chronic graft versus host disease (GvHD), and engraftment. 113 consecutive patients with myeloid malignancies who received Flu/Treo or FLAMSA-RIC conditioning prior to alloSCT between 2007 and 2019 were included. Except for age, previous therapies, and remission status before alloSCT, patient characteristics were well balanced. The median follow-up time within this analysis was 44 months. There was no significant difference in absolute neutrophil count (ANC) or platelet engraftment between the two conditioning regimens. Overall survival (OS), the relapse-free survival (RFS), and the TRM were not significantly different between the two cohorts. The rate of GvHD did not differ between the two groups. In summary, this retrospective analysis shows that there is no major difference regarding tolerability and survival between the Flu/Treo and FLAMSA-RIC regimens. Despite several limitations due to uneven distribution concerning age and remission status, we demonstrate that Flu/Treo and FLAMSA-RIC provide similar outcomes and are feasible in older and intensively pre-treated patients.
Topics: Aged; Busulfan; Graft vs Host Disease; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Myeloproliferative Disorders; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Retrospective Studies; Transplantation Conditioning; Vidarabine
PubMed: 35364726
DOI: 10.1007/s00277-022-04822-x -
Transplantation and Cellular Therapy May 2021Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) using fludarabine (Flu)-based conditioning regimens are being increasingly being used in patients with aplastic...
An Antithymocyte Globulin-Free Conditioning Regimen Using Fludarabine and Cyclophosphamide Is Associated with Good Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Matched Related Family Donor Transplantation for Aplastic Anemia.
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) using fludarabine (Flu)-based conditioning regimens are being increasingly being used in patients with aplastic anemia (AA). We describe an antithymocyte globulin (ATG)-free conditioning regimen consisting of Flu and cyclophosphamide (Cy) in patients undergoing matched related donor (MRD) HSCT for AA. Between 2004 and 2019, 212 patients underwent MRD HSCT using Flu (30 mg/m/day for 6 days) and Cy (60 mg/kg/day for 2 days) for conditioning. The graft source was peripheral blood stem cells in all patients. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted mainly of cyclosporine and methotrexate, although 41 patients received post-transplantation Cy as part of a study. Engraftment occurred in 91% of patients at a median of 16 days, whereas 4 patients (1.8%) experienced primary graft failure and 15 (7.1%) died before achieving engraftment. Toxicity was minimal. The incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD) was 27.9%, and that of grade III-IV aGVHD was 11.3%. Chronic GVHD occurred in 41.6%. 80% were free of immunosuppression at 60 months and long-term complications were seen in 8.4%. At a median of 46 months, 158 patients were alive and well, with a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 75.3 ± 3.0%. The 5-year OS was 80.6 ± 4.1% for patients age <20 years (n = 93), 74.5 ± 4.6% for those age 20 to 40 years (n = 91), and 59.7 ± 9.5% for those age >40 years (n = 28) (P = .11). Patients classified as low risk had better OS compared with those at high risk (93.2 ± 2.9% versus 65.7 ± 4.1%; P = .000). Factors affecting OS on multivariate analysis included aGVHD (P = .02) and graft failure (P = .000). This large series using Flu/Cy for conditioning before MRD HSCT confirms good outcomes in patients with AA, with excellent outcomes in low-risk patients. Suitable modifications are needed to improve outcomes in high-risk patients.
Topics: Adult; Anemia, Aplastic; Antilymphocyte Serum; Cyclophosphamide; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Vidarabine; Young Adult
PubMed: 33965181
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.01.029