-
Research and Practice in Thrombosis and... Mar 2023Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used in patients with atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. However, DOACs have important potential drug-drug... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used in patients with atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. However, DOACs have important potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with several classes of drugs. In particular, antiepileptic (AE) drugs may induce cytochrome P450 3A4 or P-glycoprotein. Co-administration of DOACs and AE drugs may result in lower DOAC drug levels and reduced DOAC efficacy. However, the clinical significance of such DDIs is uncertain.
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this systematic review was to generate an updated review of these DDIs and their clinical relevance, given the rapidly evolving knowledge relating to DOAC and AE DDIs.
METHODS
We searched the MEDLINE and Embase databases for studies reporting clinical adverse outcomes (thrombotic events, bleeding events, and all-cause mortality) in patients concomitantly taking DOACs and AE drugs.
RESULTS
We retrieved 874 studies of which 15 were deemed eligible for this review, including 4 congress abstracts, 3 case reports, 2 letters to the editor, 5 retrospective cohorts, and 1 prospective cohort study. No randomized clinical trials were found. Most of the included studies reported thrombotic events, 3 studies reported major bleeding, and one study reported all-cause mortality associated with DOAC and AE drug administration. Substantial differences in the study designs did not allow for a meta-analysis to be performed.
CONCLUSION
The current literature assessing these adverse clinical outcomes from DOAC and AE drug co-administration is limited. Although the available data point to a possible increased risk of thrombotic events, they are insufficient to draw definitive conclusions. Well-designed clinical studies are of utmost importance.
PubMed: 37122531
DOI: 10.1016/j.rpth.2023.100137 -
Planta Medica Sep 2012The use of herbal/botanical products, also referred to as complementary and alternative medicines (CAM), worldwide enjoys increasing popularity. It appears in particular... (Review)
Review
The use of herbal/botanical products, also referred to as complementary and alternative medicines (CAM), worldwide enjoys increasing popularity. It appears in particular highly prevalent in patient populations already exposed to complex treatment algorithms and polypharmacotherapy, frequently involving narrow therapeutic index drugs. Accordingly, the potential clinical dimension and relevance of herb-drug interactions has received considerable attention over the last years. However, review of pertinent literature indicates that the available clinical evidence in this regard is still limited and sometimes inconclusive. Also, communication of herb-drug interaction data in the biopharmaceutical/medical literature is often complex and confusing, not always unbiased, and in many cases appears not to strive for clear-cut and useful guidance in terms of the clinical relevance of such findings.This systematic review summarizes and interprets the published evidence on clinical herb-drug interaction studies which examined the potential of six popular herbal drugs (Echinacea, garlic, gingko, ginseng, goldenseal, and milk thistle) as perpetrators of pharmacokinetic (PK) drug interactions. Reported effect sizes were systematically categorized according to FDA drug interaction guideline criteria. A total of 66 clinical PK interaction studies, meeting the scope of the present review, were identified. The clinical evidence was found to be most robust and informative for Gingko biloba (GB; 21 studies) and milk thistle/silymarin (MT; 13), and appears still limited for ginseng (9), goldenseal/berberine (GS; 8), garlic (8), and Echinacea (7). Collectively, the available evidence indicates that, at commonly recommended doses, none of these herbs act as potent or moderate inhibitors or inducers of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes or P-glycoprotein (ABCB1). Weak effects in terms of either induction or inhibition were found for GB (presystemic/hepatic CYP3A4 induction/inhibition, CYP2C19 induction at high doses), milk thistle/silymarin (CYP2C9 inhibition), GS/berberine (CYP3A4 and CYP2D6 inhibition), Echinacea (presystemic/hepatic CYP3A4 inhibition/induction, CYP1A2 and CYP2C9 inhibition at high doses). Information was found not always complete for the major drug metabolizing CYP enzymes in the less well-studied herbs and is largely limited to P-glycoprotein (ABCB1) when effects on drug transporters have been investigated.
Topics: ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System; Echinacea; Garlic; Ginkgo biloba; Herb-Drug Interactions; Humans; Hydrastis; Silybum marianum; Panax; Pharmacokinetics; Plant Preparations
PubMed: 22855269
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1315117 -
Current Medicinal Chemistry 2019P-glycoprotein, also known as ABCB1 in the ABC transporter family, confers the simultaneous resistance of metastatic cancer cells towards various anticancer drugs with...
P-glycoprotein, also known as ABCB1 in the ABC transporter family, confers the simultaneous resistance of metastatic cancer cells towards various anticancer drugs with different targets and diverse chemical structures. The exploration of safe and specific inhibitors of this pump has always been the pursuit of scientists for the past four decades. Naturally occurring flavonoids as benzopyrone derivatives were recognized as a class of nontoxic inhibitors of P-gp. The recent advent of synthetic flavonoid dimer FD18, as a potent P-gp modulator in reversing multidrug resistance both in vitro and in vivo, specifically targeted the pseudodimeric structure of the drug transporter and represented a new generation of inhibitors with high transporter binding affinity and low toxicity. This review concerned the recent updates on the structure-activity relationships of flavonoids as P-gp inhibitors, the molecular mechanisms of their action and their ability to overcome P-gp-mediated MDR in preclinical studies. It had crucial implications on the discovery of new drug candidates that modulated the efflux of ABC transporters and also provided some clues for the future development in this promising area.
Topics: ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1; Flavonoids; Humans; Molecular Structure; Structure-Activity Relationship
PubMed: 30277144
DOI: 10.2174/0929867325666181001115225 -
Seizure Jul 2010The C3435T, a major allelic variant of the ABCB1 gene, is proposed to play a crucial role in drug-resistance in epilepsy. The C/C genotype carriers reportedly are at... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
The C3435T, a major allelic variant of the ABCB1 gene, is proposed to play a crucial role in drug-resistance in epilepsy. The C/C genotype carriers reportedly are at higher risk of pharmacoresistance to AEDs, but only in some studies. The hypothesis of the C-variant associated risk and resistance to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) has been hampered by conflicting results from inadequate power in case-control studies. To assess the role of C3435T polymorphism in drug-resistance in epilepsy, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted.
METHODS
Databases were obtained from the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, major American and European conference abstracts, and www.google.my for genetic association studies up to February 2010. All the case-control association studies evaluating the role of ABCB1 C3435T in pharmacoresistance to AEDs were identified. The new definition of treatment outcome from International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) was used for including studies for sub-analysis. To measure the strength of genetic association for the gene variant, the odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using models of both fixed- and random-effects for comparisons of the alleles and genotypes with co-dominant (C/C vs. T/T, C/T vs. T/T), dominant (C/C+C/T vs. T/T), and recessive (C/C vs. C/T+T/T) models in overall and in ethnicity subgroups. The 19 studies were selected for the next sub-analysis based on the new definition of drug-responsiveness and drug-resistance from ILAE. The same analysis was also performed for treatment outcome and ethnicity subgroups.
RESULTS
A total of 22 association studies including 3231 (47.8%) drug-resistant patients and 3524 (52.2%) drug-responsive patients or healthy controls (genotyped for C3435T) were pooled in this meta-analysis. The allelic association of ABCB1 C3435T with risk of drug-resistance was not significant under fixed-effects model, 1.06 (95% CI 0.98-1.14, p=0.12) and random-effects model, 1.10 (0.93-1.30, p=0.28) in overall and in the subgroup analysis by ethnicity. Similar results were also obtained for all genetic models in the stratified analyses by new definition of drug-resistance by ILAE and ethnicity subgroups. There was no publication bias.
CONCLUSION
We failed to show an association between the ABCB1 C3435T polymorphism and the risk of drug-resistance suggesting a revision in contribution of this polymorphism in the multi-drug transporters hypothesis of pharmacoresistance to AEDs in epilepsy.
Topics: ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1; Anticonvulsants; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Drug Resistance; Epilepsy; Gene Frequency; Genetic Variation; Genotype; Humans; Polymorphism, Genetic; Research Design; Risk Assessment
PubMed: 20605481
DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2010.05.004 -
Drugs Feb 2017As a substrate of P-glycoprotein, levocetirizine should not cause sedative effects. However, while cetirizine, a mixture of levocetirizine and dextrocetirizine, can... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
As a substrate of P-glycoprotein, levocetirizine should not cause sedative effects. However, while cetirizine, a mixture of levocetirizine and dextrocetirizine, can slightly penetrate the blood brain barrier, the sedative effects of levocetirizine are still under study.
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this study was to investigate the sedative effects of levocetirizine.
METHODS
An electronic literature search was performed using Medline and EMBASE from January 01, 2001 through August 6, 2015. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing levocetirizine with other antihistamines or placebo for patients with allergy and healthy subjects were selected. Primary outcome was risk ratio between levocetirizine and comparators. Secondary outcome was change in psychomotor speed. Data were pooled for meta-analysis using a fixed-effect model.
RESULTS
Forty-eight studies of 18,014 patients met the inclusion criteria. When compared to placebo, levocetirizine produced modest sedative effects (RR: 1.67; 95% CI 1.17, 2.38). However, when compared to other second-generation antihistamines, sedative effects of levocetirizine did not differ (RR: 1.23; 95% CI 0.96, 1.58). In subgroup analysis, there was no difference between the sedative effects of levocetirizine and fexofenadine (RR: 1.7; 95% CI 0.59, 4.88), desloratadine (RR: 1.58; 95% CI 0.9, 2.77), loratadine (RR: 1.56; 95% CI 0.28, 8.56), bilastine (RR: 1.17; 95% CI 0.48, 2.84), olopatadine (RR: 1.09; 95% CI 0.81, 1.47), azelastine (RR: 0.19; 95% CI 0.01, 3.68) and rupatadine (RR: 1.47; 95% CI 0.14, 15.72). When compared to first-generation antihistamines, levocetirizine had less sedative effects and less change of reaction time (mean difference: -250.76 s; 95% CI -338.53, -162.98).
CONCLUSION
Levocetirizine has modest sedative effects with a risk ratio of 1.67 when compared with placebo. The sedative effects observed for levocetirizine are not different from other second-generation antihistamines.
Topics: Cetirizine; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Urticaria
PubMed: 28070872
DOI: 10.1007/s40265-016-0682-0 -
Oxidative Medicine and Cellular... 2016Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide. We aim to provide a systematic review about the roles of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in anticancer therapy with Salvia... (Review)
Review
Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide. We aim to provide a systematic review about the roles of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in anticancer therapy with Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge (Danshen). Danshen, including its lipophilic and hydrophilic constituents, is potentially beneficial for treating various cancers. The mechanisms of ROS-related anticancer effects of Danshen vary depending on the specific type of cancer cells involved. Danshen may enhance TNF-α-induced apoptosis, upregulate caspase-3, caspase-8, caspase-9, endoplasmic reticulum stress, P21, P53, Bax/Bcl-2, DR5, and AMP-activated protein kinase, or activate the p38/JNK, mitogen-activated protein kinase, and FasL signaling pathways. Conversely, Danshen may downregulate human telomerase reverse transcriptase mRNA, telomerase, survivin, vascular endothelial growth factor/vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, CD31, NF-κB, Erk1/2, matrix metalloproteinases, microtubule assembly, and receptor tyrosine kinases including epidermal growth factor receptors, HER2, and P-glycoprotein and inhibit the PI3K/Akt/mTOR or estrogen receptor signaling pathways. Therefore, Danshen may inhibit cancer cells proliferation through antioxidation on tumor initiation and induce apoptosis or autophagy through ROS generation on tumor progression, tumor promotion, and tumor metastasis. Based on the available evidence regarding its anticancer properties, this review provides new insights for further anticancer research or clinical trials with Danshen.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Drugs, Chinese Herbal; Humans; Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions; Neoplasms; Reactive Oxygen Species; Salvia miltiorrhiza
PubMed: 27579153
DOI: 10.1155/2016/5293284 -
Current Drug Metabolism Jun 2008St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum, SJW) is one of the most commonly used herbal antidepressants for the treatment of minor to moderate depression. Limited clinical... (Review)
Review
St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum, SJW) is one of the most commonly used herbal antidepressants for the treatment of minor to moderate depression. Limited clinical trials suggest that hypericum and standard antidepressants have similar beneficial effects, but current evidence regarding the antidepression effects of SJW extracts is inconsistent. A major safety concern about SJW is its ability to alter the pharmacokinetics and/or clinical response of a variety of clinically important drugs. This review highlights and updates the knowledge regarding drug interactions with SJW by a systematic review of all the available evidence, including worldwide published literature and spontaneous case reports. A number of clinically significant interactions of SJW have been identified with conventional drugs. These interactions often result in a decrease in the concentration or effect of the combined drug, most probably due to the induction of cytochrome P450s (CYPs) and the key drug transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) by the major active constituents in SJW. SJW is a potent inducer of human CYP3A4 and P-gp in vitro and in vivo. In addition, pharmacodynamic interactions of SJW with some drugs (e.g. selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors) have been identified, which are associated with an increased risk of adverse reactions. Since potential interactions of SJW with conventional drugs is a major safety concern, it is important to minimize and avoid these interactions by taking appropriate approaches. These include systematic research to identify SJW-drug interaction; close therapeutic drug monitoring when SJW is combined with conventional drugs with a narrow therapeutic window; proper dose and regimen adjustment; patient education and communication between the patient and physician; design of new preparations of SJW without inducing ability of CYP3A4 and P-gp while retaining its bioactivity; and appropriate regulation in herbal safety and efficacy. Further clinical and mechanistic studies are warranted to explore the interaction of SJW with other important drugs and clinical significance.
Topics: Animals; Antidepressive Agents; Databases, Factual; Drug Interactions; Drug Monitoring; Humans; Hypericum
PubMed: 18537576
DOI: 10.2174/138920008784746391 -
Frontiers in Pharmacology 2023Guggulsterone (pregna-4,17-diene-3,16-dione; CHO) is an effective phytosterol isolated from the gum resin of the tree (Family Burseraceae) and is responsible for many...
Guggulsterone (pregna-4,17-diene-3,16-dione; CHO) is an effective phytosterol isolated from the gum resin of the tree (Family Burseraceae) and is responsible for many of the properties of guggul. This plant is widely used as traditional medicine in Ayurveda and Unani system of medicine. It exhibits several pharmacological activities, such as anti-inflammatory, analgesic, antibacterial, anti-septic and anticancer. In this article, the activities of Guggulsterone against cancerous cells were determined and summarized. Using 7 databases (PubMed, PMC, Google Scholar, Science Direct, Scopus, Cochrane and Ctri.gov), the literature search was conducted since conception until June 2021. Extensive literature search yielded 55,280 studies from all the databases. A total of 40 articles were included in the systematic review and of them, 23 articles were included in the meta-analysis.The cancerous cell lines used in the studies were for pancreatic cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, oesophageal adenocarcinoma, prostrate cancer, colon cancer, breast cancer, gut derived adenocarcinoma, gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, bladder cancer, glioblastoma, histiocytic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia and non-small cell lung cancer. The reliability of the selected studies was assessed using ToxRTool. Based on this review, guggulsterone significantly affected pancreatic cancer (MiaPaCa-2, Panc-1, PC-Sw, CD18/HPAF, Capan1, PC-3), hepatocellular carcinoma (Hep3B, HepG2, PLC/PRF/5R), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC4, UM-22b, 1483), cholangiocarcinoma (HuCC-T1, RBE, Sk-ChA-1, Mz-ChA-1) and oesophageal adenocarcinoma (CP-18821, OE19), prostrate cancer (PC-3), colon cancer (HT-29), breast cancer (MCF7/DOX), gut derived adenocarcinoma (Bic-1), gastric cancer (SGC-7901), colorectal cancer (HCT116), bladder cancer (T24, TSGH8301), glioblastoma (A172, U87MG, T98G), histiocytic leukemia (U937), acute myeloid leukemia (HL60, U937) and non-small cell lung cancer (A549, H1975) by inducing apoptotic pathways, inhibiting cell proliferation, and regulating the expression of genes involved in apoptosis. Guggulsterone is known to have therapeutic and preventive effects on various categories of cancers. It can inhibit the progression of tumors and can even reduce their size by inducing apoptosis, exerting anti-angiogenic effects, and modulating various signaling cascades. studies reveal that Guggulsterone inhibits and suppresses the proliferation of an extensive range of cancer cells by decreasing intrinsic mitochondrial apoptosis, regulating NF-kB/STAT3/β-Catenin/PI3K/Akt/CHOP pathway, modulating the expression of associated genes/proteins, and inhibiting angiogenesis. Furthermore, Guggulsterone reduces the production of inflammatory markers, such as CDX2 and COX-2. The other mechanism of the Guggulsterone activity is the reversal of P-glycoprotein-mediated multidrug resistance. Twenty three studies were selected for meta-analysis following the PRISMA statements. Fixed effect model was used for reporting the odds ratio. The primary endpoint was percentage apoptosis. 11 of 23 studies reported the apoptotic effect at t = 24 h and pooled odds ratio was 3.984 (CI 3.263 to 4.865, < 0.001). 12 studies used Guggulsterone for t > 24 h and the odds ratio was 11.171 (CI 9.148 to 13.643, 95% CI, < 0.001). The sub-group analysis based on cancer type, Guggulsterone dose, and treatment effects. Significant alterations in the level of apoptotic markers were reported by Guggulsterone treatment. This study suggested that Guggulsterone has apoptotic effects against various cancer types. Further investigation of its pharmacological activity and mechanism of action should be conducted. experiments and clinical trials are required to confirm the anticancer activity.
PubMed: 37201024
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1155163 -
Biomedicines Jan 2024Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a diverse group of leukemias characterized by the uncontrolled proliferation of clonal neoplastic hematopoietic precursor cells with... (Review)
Review
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a diverse group of leukemias characterized by the uncontrolled proliferation of clonal neoplastic hematopoietic precursor cells with chromosomal rearrangements and multiple gene mutations and the impairment of normal hematopoiesis. Current efforts to improve AML outcomes have focused on developing targeted therapies that may allow for improved antileukemic effects while reducing toxicity significantly. Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) is one of the most thoroughly studied molecularly targeted therapies in adults. GO is a monoclonal antibody against CD33 IgG4 linked to the cytotoxic drug calicheamicin DMH. The use of GO as a chemotherapeutic agent is not generalized for all patients who suffer from AML, particularly for those whose health prevents them from using intensive conventional chemotherapy, in which case it can be used on its own, and those who have suffered a first relapse, where its combination with other chemotherapeutic agents is possible. This systematic review aimed to comprehensively evaluate GO, focusing on its molecular structure, mode of action, pharmacokinetics, recommended dosage, resistance mechanisms, and associated toxicities to provide valuable information on the potential benefits and risks associated with its clinical use. A systematic review of eight scientific articles from 2018 to 2023 was conducted using PRISMA analysis. The results showed that GO treatment activates proapoptotic pathways and induces double-strand breaks, initiating DNA repair mechanisms. Cells defective in DNA repair pathways are susceptible to GO cytotoxicity. GO has recommended doses for newly diagnosed CD33+ AML in combination or as a single agent. Depending on the treatment regimen and patient status, GO doses vary for induction, consolidation, and continuation cycles. Multidrug resistance (MDR) involving P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is associated with GO resistance. The overexpression of P-gp reduces GO cytotoxicity; inhibitors of P-gp can restore sensitivity. Mitochondrial pathway activation and survival signaling pathways are linked to GO resistance. Other resistance mechanisms include altered pharmacokinetics, reduced binding ability, and anti-apoptotic mechanisms. GO has limited extramedullary toxicity compared to other AML treatments and may cause hepatic veno-occlusive disease (HVOD). The incidence of hepatic HVOD after GO therapy is higher in patients with high tumor burden. Hematological side effects and hepatotoxicity are prominent, with thrombocytopenia and neutropenia observed. In conclusion, GO's reintroduction in 2017 followed a thorough FDA review considering its altered dose, dosing schedule, and target population. The drug's mechanism involves CD33 targeting and calicheamicin-induced DNA damage, leading to apoptosis and resistance mechanisms, including MDR and survival signaling, which impact treatment outcomes. Despite limited extramedullary toxicity, GO is associated with hematological side effects and hepatotoxicity.
PubMed: 38255313
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12010208 -
Farmacia Hospitalaria : Organo Oficial... 2012The new protease inhibitors (PIs), telaprevir and boceprevir, with peginterferon and ribavirin, have increased the response rate in patients with genotype 1 chronic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
The new protease inhibitors (PIs), telaprevir and boceprevir, with peginterferon and ribavirin, have increased the response rate in patients with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C. Both are metabolized by CYP3A and they are CYP3A inhibitors. Furthermore, they are substrates, also telaprevir is an inhibitor, for P-glycoprotein. Our aim is to analyze the interactions between these IPs and other medications.
METHOD
We performed a systematic review in PubMed and Cochrane database and in conference abstracts of the last 2-5 years. Another search was performed in Medline to check efficacy clinical trials in phase II and III, in Micromedex database and in label information.
RESULTS
In PubMed we found two Phase I clinical trials; we did not find any article in the Cochrane database. 14 conference abstracts were selected, mainly there are phase I studies. In the free search in PubMed was located an in vitro / in vivo preclinical study which analyzed the co-administration of IPs and ritonavir. In phase II and III clinical trials, there was no mention about interactions.
CONCLUSIONS
Currently, there are pharmacokinetic Phase I studies about the interaction between PIs and representative drugs (potent inducers, potent inhibitors, high protein binding drugs, etc.), but the evidence of these interactions is contradictory. Its incorporation into the therapeutic have to take into account the possibility of complex interactions and not entirely known, about their mechanism of action, which might compromise its effectiveness or increase its toxicity.
Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drug Interactions; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Oligopeptides; Proline
PubMed: 23461440
DOI: 10.7399/FH.2012.36.6.47