-
Evidence-based Complementary and... 2021The L. leaf is gaining interest as a potential therapeutic agent for alleviating dengue- and non-dengue-associated thrombocytopaenia. In that regard, safety... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
The L. leaf is gaining interest as a potential therapeutic agent for alleviating dengue- and non-dengue-associated thrombocytopaenia. In that regard, safety considerations are as important as efficacy potential. The safety evaluation of botanical products for human use is complicated by variable formulations, complex phytochemical composition, and extrinsic toxicants. This review aimed to systematically collate related safety clinical and preclinical data, as well as reports on herb-drug interactions of leaf consumption.
METHODS
A systematic search using predetermined keywords on electronic databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane Library Central, LILACS, and Web of Science) and grey literature was conducted. Relevant clinical and preclinical studies were identified, screened, and analysed to present an overall safety profile of leaf consumption.
RESULTS
A total of 41 articles were included (23 clinical, 5 ongoing trials, and 13 preclinical) for descriptive analysis on study characteristics, adverse reactions, toxicity findings, and herb-drug interactions, from which 13 randomised controlled and quasiexperimental trials were further assessed for risk of bias and reporting quality. Overall, leaf consumption (in the form of juice and standardised aqueous extract) was well tolerated by adult humans for short durations (
ported safe consumption of leaf standardised aqueous extract in children (aged 1-12 years). Minor gastrointestinal side effects were most commonly reported. There are concerns about hepatotoxicity and reproductive toxicity in long-term use, supported by animal studies. Unfavourable herb-drug interactions with metformin, glimepiride, digoxin, ciprofloxacin, and artemisinin were accounted. CONCLUSION
leaf consumption in adults is generally safe for short-term use though cautioned in pregnancy and people with liver impairment. It has potential herb-drug interactions with oral hypoglycaemic agents, p-glycoprotein substrates, and antibiotics with cation chelating properties.
PubMed: 34040647
DOI: 10.1155/2021/5511221 -
Drugs 2009The concomitant use of herbal medicines and pharmacotherapy is wide spread. We have reviewed the literature to determine the possible interactions between seven popular... (Review)
Review
The concomitant use of herbal medicines and pharmacotherapy is wide spread. We have reviewed the literature to determine the possible interactions between seven popular herbal medicines (ginkgo, St John's wort, ginseng, garlic, echinacea, saw palmetto and kava) and conventional drugs. Literature searches were performed using MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and EMBASE and we identified 128 case reports or case series, and 80 clinical trials. Clinical trials indicate that St John's wort (Hypericum perforatum), via cytochrome P450 (CYP) and/or P-glycoprotein induction, reduces the plasma concentrations (and/or increases the clearance) of alprazolam, amitriptyline, atorvastatin, chlorzoxazone, ciclosporin, debrisoquine, digoxin, erythromycin, fexofenadine, gliclazide, imatinib, indinavir, irinotecan, ivabradine, mephenytoin, methadone, midazolam, nifedipine, omeprazole, oral contraceptives, quazepam, simvastatin, tacrolimus, talinolol, verapamil, voriconazole and warfarin. Case reports or case series suggest interactions of St John's wort with adrenergic vasopressors, anaesthetics, bupropion, buspirone, ciclosporin, eletriptan, loperamide, nefazodone, nevirapine, oral contraceptives, paroxetine, phenprocoumon, prednisone, sertraline, tacrolimus, theophylline, tibolone, tryptophan, venlafaxine and warfarin. Ginkgo (Ginkgo biloba) decreases the plasma concentrations of omeprazole, ritonavir and tolbutamide. Clinical cases indicate interactions of ginkgo with antiepileptics, aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid), diuretics, ibuprofen, risperidone, rofecoxib, trazodone and warfarin. Ginseng (Panax ginseng) may interact with phenelzine and warfarin. Kava (Piper methysticum) increases the clearance of chlorzoxazone (a CYP2E1 substrate) and may interact with alprazolam, levodopa and paroxetine. Garlic (Allium sativum) interacts with chlorpropamide, fluindione, ritonavir and warfarin; it also reduces plasma concentrations of chlorzoxazone (a CYP2E1 probe). Echinacea might affect the clearance of caffeine (a CYP1A2 probe) and midazolam (a CYP3A4 probe). No interactions have been reported for saw palmetto (Serenoa repens). Numerous interactions between herbal medicines and conventional drugs have been documented. While the significance of many interactions is uncertain, several interactions, particularly those with St John's wort, may have serious clinical consequences.
Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System; Herb-Drug Interactions; Humans
PubMed: 19719333
DOI: 10.2165/11317010-000000000-00000 -
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Sep 2017In recent years, an increasing number of clinical drug-drug interactions (DDIs) have been attributed to inhibition of intestinal organic anion-transporting polypeptides... (Review)
Review
In recent years, an increasing number of clinical drug-drug interactions (DDIs) have been attributed to inhibition of intestinal organic anion-transporting polypeptides (OATPs); however, only a few of these DDI results were reflected in drug labels. This review aims to provide a thorough analysis of intestinal OATP-mediated pharmacokinetic-based DDIs, using both in vitro and clinical investigations, highlighting the main mechanistic findings and discussing their clinical relevance. On the basis of pharmacogenetic and clinical DDI results, a total of 12 drugs were identified as possible clinical substrates of OATP2B1 and OATP1A2. Among them, 3 drugs, namely atenolol, celiprolol, and fexofenadine, have emerged as the most sensitive substrates to evaluate clinical OATP-mediated intestinal DDIs when interactions with P-glycoprotein by the test compound can be ruled out. With regard to perpetrators, 8 dietary or natural products and 1 investigational drug, ronacaleret (now terminated), showed clinical intestinal inhibition attributable to OATPs, producing ≥20% decreases in area under the plasma concentration-time curve of the co-administered drug. Common juices, such as apple juice, grapefruit juice, and orange juice, are considered potent inhibitors of intestinal OATP2B1 and OATP1A2 (decreasing exposure of the co-administered substrate by ∼85%) and may be adequate prototype inhibitors to investigate intestinal DDIs mediated by OATPs.
Topics: Beverages; Drug Interactions; Food-Drug Interactions; Humans; Intestinal Absorption; Intestinal Mucosa; Organic Anion Transporters; Pharmaceutical Preparations
PubMed: 28414144
DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2017.04.004 -
Current Medical Research and Opinion Jan 2010Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common, seriously impairing illness. Desvenlafaxine (administered as desvenlafaxine succinate) is the third serotonin-norepinephrine... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common, seriously impairing illness. Desvenlafaxine (administered as desvenlafaxine succinate) is the third serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) approved in the United States for the treatment of MDD. Short-term clinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of 50 to 400 mg/d doses, with no evidence that doses greater than 50 mg/d confer additional benefit.
OBJECTIVE
This paper summarizes published data on the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the desvenlafaxine 50-mg/d recommended therapeutic dose for MDD and discusses clinical practice considerations.
METHODS
A systematic review of MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and PubMed (all years through June 2009) was performed using the terms desvenlafaxine, DVS, and ODV. The criteria for inclusion in the review were a double-blind design, a placebo control or active comparator group, the 50-mg desvenlafaxine dose group, and enrollment of patients with a diagnosis of MDD. Posters were included if they reported on a study that was subsequently published in a manuscript.
RESULTS
Overall results of two randomized, placebo-controlled, 8-week clinical trials demonstrated the efficacy of desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d for MDD. Statistically significant improvements compared with placebo were observed on the primary efficacy measure (17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HAM-D(17)] total score; P < 0.05). Significant differences were observed on several secondary measures (Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale scores in both trials [P < 0.05]; Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scores [P < or = 0.01], Clinical Global Impressions-Severity scores [P < or = 0.01], HAM-D(17) response [P < or = 0.01] and remission [P < 0.05] in one trial each). Functional outcomes measures (Sheehan Disability Scale total and World Health Organization 5-Item Well-Being Index scores) were significant in both trials (P < 0.05). Safety results indicate desvenlafaxine treatment was safe and well tolerated; findings were consistent with the SNRI class. The generalizability of these findings is limited by the study protocols, which excluded patients with unstable comorbid medical conditions and also those with other Axis 1 and 2 psychiatric illnesses. Additionally, comparisons with other SNRIs are challenging given differences in study design. Desvenlafaxine can be initiated with the 50-mg/d therapeutic dose without titration and provides efficacy with rates of discontinuation due to treatment-emergent adverse events similar to placebo. In vitro data indicate desvenlafaxine has minimal inhibitory effects on cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 and clinical studies show desvenlafaxine does not have a clinically relevant effect on CYP2D6 metabolism. In vitro data also indicate desvenlafaxine is not a substrate or inhibitor of the p-glycoprotein transporter. Plasma protein binding of desvenlafaxine is low (30%) and independent of drug concentration. Bioavailability is high at 80% after oral administration and is not affected by food.
CONCLUSIONS
Desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d has demonstrated efficacy, safety, and tolerability for the treatment of MDD in two placebo-controlled trials. The metabolic profile of desvenlafaxine suggests a low risk of drug-drug interactions owing to minimal inhibitory effects on CYP2D6, lack of interaction with p-glycoprotein, and low protein binding.
Topics: Antidepressive Agents; Cyclohexanols; Depressive Disorder, Major; Desvenlafaxine Succinate; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Neurotransmitter Uptake Inhibitors; Placebos; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 19919295
DOI: 10.1185/03007990903408678 -
Clinical Pharmacokinetics Oct 2019Enzyme-mediated biotransformation of pharmacological agents is a crucial step in xenobiotic detoxification and drug disposition. Herein, we investigated the metabolism...
Physicochemical Properties, Biotransformation, and Transport Pathways of Established and Newly Approved Medications: A Systematic Review of the Top 200 Most Prescribed Drugs vs. the FDA-Approved Drugs Between 2005 and 2016.
BACKGROUND
Enzyme-mediated biotransformation of pharmacological agents is a crucial step in xenobiotic detoxification and drug disposition. Herein, we investigated the metabolism and physicochemical properties of the top 200 most prescribed drugs (established) as well as drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between 2005 and 2016 (newly approved).
OBJECTIVE
Our objective was to capture the changing trends in the routes of administration, physicochemical properties, and prodrug medications, as well as the contributions of drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters to drug clearance.
METHODS
The University of Washington Drug Interaction Database (DIDB) as well as other online resources (e.g., CenterWatch.com, Drugs.com, DrugBank.ca, and PubChem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) was used to collect and stratify the dataset required for exploring the above-mentioned trends.
RESULTS
Analyses revealed that ~ 90% of all drugs in the established and newly approved drug lists were administered systemically (oral or intravenous). Meanwhile, the portion of biologics (molecular weight > 1 kDa) was 15 times greater in the newly approved list than established drugs. Additionally, there was a 4.5-fold increase in the number of compounds with a high calculated partition coefficient (cLogP > 3) and a high total polar surface area (> 75 Å) in the newly approved drug vs. the established category. Further, prodrugs in established or newly approved lists were found to be converted to active compounds via hydrolysis, demethylases, and kinases. The contribution of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, as the major biotransformation pathway, has increased from 40% in the established drug list to 64% in the newly approved drug list. Moreover, the role of CYP1A2, CYP2C19, and CYP2D6 were decreased as major metabolizing enzymes among the newly approved medications. Among non-CYP major metabolizers, the contribution of alcohol dehydrogenases/aldehyde dehydrogenases (ADH/ALDH) and sulfotransferases decreased in the newly approved drugs compared with the established list. Furthermore, the highest contribution among uptake and efflux transporters was found for Organic Anion Transporting Polypeptide 1B1 (OATP1B1) and P-glycoprotein (P-gp), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
The higher portion of biologics in the newly approved drugs compared with the established list confirmed the growing demands for protein- and antibody-based therapies. Moreover, the larger number of hydrophilic drugs found in the newly approved list suggests that the probability of toxicity is likely to decrease. With regard to CYP-mediated major metabolism, CYP3A5 showed an increased involvement owing to the identification of unique probe substrates to differentiate CYP3As. Furthermore, the contribution of OATP1B1 and P-gp did not show a significant shift in the newly approved drugs as compared to the established list because of their broad substrate specificity.
Topics: Animals; Biological Transport; Biotransformation; Drug Approval; Humans; Prescription Drugs; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration
PubMed: 30972694
DOI: 10.1007/s40262-019-00750-8 -
Polypharmacy in polymorbid pregnancies and the risk of congenital malformations-A systematic review.Basic & Clinical Pharmacology &... Mar 2022With an increased prevalence of concurrent morbidities during pregnancy, polypharmacy has become increasingly common in pregnant women. The risks associated with...
With an increased prevalence of concurrent morbidities during pregnancy, polypharmacy has become increasingly common in pregnant women. The risks associated with polypharmacy may exceed those of individual medication because of drug-drug interactions. This systematic review aims to evaluate the risk of congenital malformations in polymorbid pregnancies exposed to first-trimester polypharmacy. PubMed, Embase and Scopus were searched to identify original human studies with first- trimester polypharmacy due to polymorbidity as the exposure and congenital malformations as the outcome. After screening of 4034 identified records, seven studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Four of the seven studies reported an increased risk of congenital malformations compared with unexposed or monotherapy, odds ratios ranging from 1.1 to >10.0. Particularly, short-term anti-infective treatment combined with other drugs and P-glycoprotein substrates were associated with increased malformation risks. In conclusion, knowledge is limited on risks associated with first-trimester polypharmacy due to polymorbidity with the underlying evidence of low quantity and quality. Therefore, an increased focus on pharmacovigilance to enable safe drug use in early pregnancy is needed. Large-scale register-based studies and better knowledge of placental biology are needed to support the clinical management of polymorbid pregnancies that require polypharmacy.
Topics: Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Female; Humans; Placenta; Polypharmacy; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Pregnancy Trimester, First
PubMed: 34841667
DOI: 10.1111/bcpt.13695 -
Pharmacogenomics May 2011Several studies demonstrated a link between ABCB1 gene variants and the response to treatment in epilepsy, but the results have been inconclusive. Here, we performed the... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
AIMS
Several studies demonstrated a link between ABCB1 gene variants and the response to treatment in epilepsy, but the results have been inconclusive. Here, we performed the first haplotype meta-analysis to examine the association of haplotypes of ABCB1 common variants with the response to treatment in epilepsy.
MATERIALS & METHODS
We meta-analyzed the studies that evaluated the role of ABCB1 C1236T, G2677T/A and C3435T polymorphisms and their haplotypes in the response to treatment.
RESULTS
Meta-analysis of 23 studies (7067 patients) showed no significant association of ABCB1 alleles, genotypes and haplotypes with the response to treatment in the overall population or in each ethnicity subgroup.
CONCLUSION
Our data suggest that the haplotypes of these loci may not be involved in the response to treatment.
Topics: ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1; Alleles; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsy; Genetic Variation; Genome-Wide Association Study; Genotype; Haplotypes; Humans; Polymorphism, Genetic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 21391884
DOI: 10.2217/pgs.10.212 -
The Journal of Rheumatology Mar 2023The use of colchicine has been associated with varying degrees of myelosuppression. Despite expanded use in cardiovascular and inflammatory conditions, there remains...
OBJECTIVE
The use of colchicine has been associated with varying degrees of myelosuppression. Despite expanded use in cardiovascular and inflammatory conditions, there remains clinician concern because of potential myelosuppressive side effects. A systematic review was conducted to explore the reported myelosuppressive events of colchicine.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted using the MeSH terms ("colchicine") AND ("myelosuppression," "bone*," "marrow," "suppression," "aplasia," "leukopenia/leucopenia," "lymphopenia," "neutropenia") on September 1, 2020, and was updated on November 30, 2021. The search was conducted in PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Library. The search included references published from 1978 to 2020 and was limited to English-language observational studies (ie, case reports, case series, case control studies, and cohort studies) or trial data.
RESULTS
In total, 3233 articles were screened, with 30 studies of 47 patients with myelosuppression from colchicine identified. Most patients with myelosuppression had comorbidities, including renal impairment (21/47, 44.7%). Out of 47 patients, 15 (31.9%) and 13 (27.7%) were reported to be concurrently taking cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) inhibitors and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) efflux transporter inhibitors, respectively. Patients with renal impairment accounted for the majority of overall patients taking these CYP3A4 and P-gp inhibitors (8/15, 53.3%, and 8/13, 61.5%, respectively). Out of 21 patients with renal impairment, 13 had worsening cytopenia during colchicine use. The presentations ranged from moderate anemia (grade 2) to severe thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and leukopenia (grade 4).
CONCLUSION
Colchicine has few reports of myelosuppression. The majority of patients with myelosuppression had preexisting renal impairment or concomitant CYP3A4 or P-gp inhibitor use. Caution should be taken in this subset of patients with increased monitoring.
Topics: Humans; Colchicine; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Comorbidity; Bone Marrow Diseases; Neutropenia
PubMed: 36319015
DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.220524 -
Epilepsy Research May 2020Use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), including dabigatran etexilate, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban or betrixaban provides a safe and convenient...
Use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), including dabigatran etexilate, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban or betrixaban provides a safe and convenient alternative to the traditional anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists or heparin derivatives. Many patients receiving long-term seizure prophylaxis with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) may require anticoagulation with NOACs. Providers caring for these patients need to be informed about potential interactions between AEDs and NOACs and the relevant clinical consequences. A systematic review of the existing literature was conducted to elucidate current knowledge on the clinically relevant interactions between AEDs and NOACs and highlight areas in which further research is needed. The systematic review protocol was developed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidance. Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Library and SciFinder were searched. Of the 630 non-duplicate items identified by the search, 13 met eligibility criteria. These 13 items included 8 case reports, 2 letters to the editor and 3 nonrandomized studies. The majority of pharmacokinetic interactions between NOACs and first generation AEDs occurred via the induction of the hepatic enzyme system and competition for the P-glycoprotein transporter and lead to decreased NOAC plasma levels and consequent thrombotic events. Only one article, a case report, was identified that focused on interactions between the second generation AED and a NOAC. At the present time, the limited evidence suggests that enzyme-inducing or inhibiting AEDs reduce the effectiveness of anticoagulation produced by several NOACs. This information may help providers anticipate possible interactions and guide therapy appropriately.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Anticoagulants; Anticonvulsants; Drug Interactions; Epilepsy; Humans
PubMed: 32155540
DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2020.106304 -
European Journal of Surgical Oncology :... Oct 2009Finding reliable prognostic factors for osteosarcoma remains problematic. A systematic review [Davis AM, Bell RS, Goodwin PJ. Prognostic factors in osteosarcoma: a... (Review)
Review
AIM
Finding reliable prognostic factors for osteosarcoma remains problematic. A systematic review [Davis AM, Bell RS, Goodwin PJ. Prognostic factors in osteosarcoma: a critical review. Journal of Clinical Oncology 1994; 12(2): 423-431.] showed chemotherapy response as only independent factor. We tried to identify evidence-based prognostic factors in the literature since 1992 and to establish pooled relative risks of factors.
METHODS
MEDLINE and Embase search (1992-August 2006). Two reviewers independently selected papers addressing prognostic factors in localized extremity osteosarcoma, which were studied for methodological quality, and valuable new factors. An attempt was made to pool results.
RESULTS
Of 1777 "hits", 93 papers were studied in depth. Several "new" prognostic factors were found. Only 7 papers were of sufficient quality to analyze. Chemotherapy response, tumor size and site, alkaline phosphatase level and p-glycoprotein expression seemed to be independent factors. Some new factors looked promising.
CONCLUSIONS
Although the literature is abundant, it is disappointing that only few papers are of sufficient quality to allow hard conclusions. Because of heterogeneity of the studies pooling results is hardly possible. There is a need for standardization of studies and reports.
Topics: Bone Neoplasms; Extremities; Humans; Osteosarcoma; Prognosis; Survival Analysis
PubMed: 19232880
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2009.01.011