-
Journal of Immunology Research 2021Sjögren's syndrome (SS) is a chronic autoimmune disease of unknown etiology that mainly involves exocrine glands. Patients present with dry mouth and eyes, fever,...
Sjögren's syndrome (SS) is a chronic autoimmune disease of unknown etiology that mainly involves exocrine glands. Patients present with dry mouth and eyes, fever, arthralgia, and other systemic symptoms. In severe cases, the quality of life of patients is affected. At present, there is no cure for SS, and the treatment options are extremely limited. In recent years, studies of patients and animal models have identified abnormalities of immune cell function and cytokines to be involved in SS. A systematic review of the literature may clarify the etiology and pathogenesis of SS, as well as provide a theoretical basis for the development of new drugs for the treatment of SS.
Topics: Animals; Cytokines; Disease Models, Animal; Exocrine Glands; Humans; Immunologic Factors; Quality of Life; Severity of Illness Index; Signal Transduction; Sjogren's Syndrome
PubMed: 34660815
DOI: 10.1155/2021/5928232 -
Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism Dec 2015To report a case of rituximab-induced serum sickness (RISS) and perform a systematic review and characterize RISS in autoimmune diseases and hematological malignancies. (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
To report a case of rituximab-induced serum sickness (RISS) and perform a systematic review and characterize RISS in autoimmune diseases and hematological malignancies.
METHODS
A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, ACR, and EULAR databases was performed for relevant articles of patients with RISS from inception to September 2014. Statistical analysis of demographic and clinical features was performed using Microsoft EXCEL 2007 and SPSS version 20.0.
RESULTS
In the 33 patients with RISS, the mean age of presentation was 39.1 ± 17.5yr with a female preponderance (n = 23, 76.67%). The majority of cases were associated with an underlying rheumatologic condition (n = 17, 51.5%), most commonly Sjögren's syndrome (n = 8, 44.4%). The classic triad of serum sickness (fever, rash, and arthralgia) was reported in 16 (48.5%) cases. Time from drug exposure to symptom onset was significantly greater with the first doses of rituximab compared to the second dose (mean time 10.00 vs. 4.05d, P = 0.002), and time to resolution was significantly greater for rheumatologic vs. hematological indications (mean time 2.50 vs. 1.00d, P = 0.035). Corticosteroids were the most commonly used treatment (n = 21), with all cases reporting a complete resolution of symptoms in 2.15 ± 1.34d.
CONCLUSION
It is important to recognize RISS clinically, as it may mimic exacerbation of various rheumatologic conditions. Although RISS is typically self-limited, further infusions of rituximab should be avoided, as it may provoke more severe symptoms.
Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Female; Humans; Immunologic Factors; Middle Aged; Rituximab; Serum Sickness
PubMed: 26199061
DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2015.06.014 -
International Journal of Environmental... Sep 2022Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease that is characterized by clinical heterogeneity and irregularities in its course. The etiology and... (Review)
Review
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease that is characterized by clinical heterogeneity and irregularities in its course. The etiology and pathogenesis of this pathology are not well-understood, so there is difficulty in establishing a diagnosis and treatment plan with certainty. The aim of this systematic review is to present a qualitative synthesis of studies referring to the oral manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). This systematic review was performed following the PRISMA guideline. On this basis, a search for articles was performed in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases on 19 November 2021 and updated on 15 February 2022. We chose articles published between 2012 and 2022 that analyzed the oral manifestations of SLE patients. The quality of all these studies was analyzed following the STROBE scale. A total of 15 articles were included in this study after selection. The selected articles were cross-sectional, case-control, and cohort studies. The most frequently associated oral manifestations with SLE were oral ulcers, hyposalivation, pigmentations, glossodynia, cleft tongue, cheilitis, arthritis, and secondary Sjögren's syndrome. However, despite the importance of the perception of these oral manifestations in the early diagnosis of SLE, there are still not enough studies about them.
Topics: Arthritis; Autoimmune Diseases; Humans; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic; Sjogren's Syndrome; Xerostomia
PubMed: 36231212
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191911910 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Feb 2017Theoretically, autologous serum eye drops (AS) offer a potential advantage over traditional therapies on the assumption that AS not only serve as a lacrimal substitute... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Theoretically, autologous serum eye drops (AS) offer a potential advantage over traditional therapies on the assumption that AS not only serve as a lacrimal substitute to provide lubrication but contain other biochemical components that allow them to mimic natural tears more closely. Application of AS has gained popularity as second-line therapy for patients with dry eye. Published studies on this subject indicate that autologous serum could be an effective treatment for dry eye.
OBJECTIVES
We conducted this review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AS given alone or in combination with artificial tears as compared with artificial tears alone, saline, placebo, or no treatment for adults with dry eye.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register) (2016, Issue 5), Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily, Ovid OLDMEDLINE (January 1946 to July 2016), Embase (January 1980 to July 2016), Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences (LILACS) (January 1982 to July 2016), the ISRCTN registry (www.isrctn.com/editAdvancedSearch), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov) and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en). We also searched the Science Citation Index Expanded database (December 2016) and reference lists of included studies. We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 5 July 2016.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared AS versus artificial tears for treatment of adults with dry eye.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently screened all titles and abstracts and assessed full-text reports of potentially eligible trials. Two review authors extracted data and assessed risk of bias and characteristics of included trials. We contacted investigators to ask for missing data. For both primary and secondary outcomes, we reported mean differences with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for continuous outcomes. We did not perform meta-analysis owing to differences in outcome assessments across trials.
MAIN RESULTS
We identified five eligible RCTs (92 participants) that compared AS versus artificial tears or saline in individuals with dry eye of various origins (Sjögren's syndrome-related dry eye, non-Sjögren's syndrome dry eye, and postoperative dry eye induced by laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK)). We assessed the certainty of evidence as low or very low because of lack of reporting of quantitative data for most outcomes and unclear or high risk of bias among trials. We judged most risk of bias domains to have unclear risk in two trials owing to insufficient reporting of trial characteristics, and we considered one trial to have high risk of bias for most domains. We judged the remaining two trials to have low risk of bias; however, these trials used a cross-over design and did not report data in a way that could be used to compare outcomes between treatment groups appropriately. Incomplete outcome reporting and heterogeneity among outcomes and follow-up periods prevented inclusion of these trials in a summary meta-analysis.Three trials compared AS with artificial tears; however, only one trial reported quantitative data for analysis. Low-certainty evidence from one trial suggested that AS might provide some improvement in participant-reported symptoms compared with artificial tears after two weeks of treatment; the mean difference in mean change in symptom score measured on a visual analogue scale (range 0 to 100, with higher scores representing worse symptoms) was -12.0 (95% confidence interval (CI) -20.16 to -3.84; 20 participants). This same trial found mixed results with respect to ocular surface outcomes; the mean difference in mean change in scores between AS and artificial tears was -0.9 (95% CI -1.47 to -0.33; 20 participants; low-certainty evidence) for fluorescein staining and -2.2 (95% CI -2.73 to -1.67; 20 participants; low-certainty evidence) for Rose Bengal staining. Both staining scales range from 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating worse results. The mean change in tear film break-up time was 2.00 seconds longer (95% CI 0.99 to 3.01; 20 participants; low-certainty evidence) in the AS group than in the artificial tears group. Investigators reported no clinically meaningful differences in Schirmer's test scores between groups (mean difference -0.40 mm, 95% CI -2.91 to 2.11; 20 participants; low-certainty evidence). None of these three trials reported tear hyperosmolarity and adverse events.Two trials compared AS versus saline; however, only one trial reported quantitative data for analysis of only one outcome (Rose Bengal staining). Trial investigators of the two studies reported no differences in symptom scores, fluorescein staining scores, tear film break-up times, or Schirmer's test scores between groups at two to four weeks' follow-up. Very low-certainty evidence from one trial suggested that AS might provide some improvement in Rose Bengal staining scores compared with saline after four weeks of treatment; the mean difference in Rose Bengal staining score (range from 0 to 9, with higher scores showing worse results) was -0.60 (95% CI -1.11 to -0.09; 35 participants). Neither trial reported tear hyperosmolarity outcomes. One trial reported adverse events; two of 12 participants had signs of conjunctivitis with negative culture that did resolve.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Overall, investigators reported inconsistency in possible benefits of AS for improving participant-reported symptoms and other objective clinical measures. There might be some benefit in symptoms with AS compared with artificial tears in the short-term, but we found no evidence of an effect after two weeks of treatment. Well-planned, large, high-quality RCTs are warranted to examine participants with dry eye of different severities by using standardized questionnaires to measure participant-reported outcomes, as well as objective clinical tests and objective biomarkers to assess the benefit of AS therapy for dry eye.
Topics: Adult; Dry Eye Syndromes; Humans; Lubricant Eye Drops; Ophthalmic Solutions; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Serum; Sodium Chloride; Tears
PubMed: 28245347
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009327.pub3 -
Journal of Stomatology, Oral and... Oct 2022This systematic review aimed to evaluate complications and survival rates of dental implants placed in patients suffering from autoimmune diseases.
PURPOSE
This systematic review aimed to evaluate complications and survival rates of dental implants placed in patients suffering from autoimmune diseases.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses systematic review guidelines (PRISMA), using Google scholar and PubMed electronic databases with a stop date of September 2021. The eligibility criteria included all full text human studies in the English language literature reporting on patients with autoimmune diseases treated with dental implants.
RESULTS
Fifty-five studies reporting on nine distinct autoimmune diseases were analyzed: 17 on Sjögren's syndrome (SS), 11 on oral lichen planus (OLP), 8 on Type 1 diabetes, 6 on rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 4 on systemic scleroderma (SSc), 3 on Crohn's disease (CD), 3 on systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), 2 on mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMB) and 1 on pemphigus vulgaris (PV). Despite the heterogeneity and methodological limitations of most of the studies, results showed that dental implant survival rates were comparable to those reported in the general population. However, patients with secondary SS or erosive OLP were more susceptible to developing peri-mucositis and increased marginal bone loss.
CONCLUSION
This review suggested that dental implants may be considered as a safe and viable therapeutic option in the management of edentulous patients suffering from autoimmune diseases. Nevertheless, scrupulous maintenance of oral hygiene and long-term follow-up emerge as being the common determinants for uneventful dental implant treatment.
Topics: Dental Implants; Humans; Lichen Planus, Oral; Sjogren's Syndrome
PubMed: 35033725
DOI: 10.1016/j.jormas.2022.01.005 -
EBioMedicine Jun 2022Emerging evidence suggests that dysbiosis in gut microbiota may contribute to the occurrence or development of several rheumatic diseases. Since gut microbiota dysbiosis... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Emerging evidence suggests that dysbiosis in gut microbiota may contribute to the occurrence or development of several rheumatic diseases. Since gut microbiota dysbiosis is potentially modifiable, it has been postulated to be a promising preventive or therapeutic target for rheumatic diseases. However, the current understanding on the potential associations between gut microbiota and rheumatic diseases is still inadequate. Therefore, we aimed to synthesise the accumulating evidence for the relation of gut microbiota to rheumatic diseases.
METHODS
The PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to March 11, 2022 to include observational studies evaluating the associations between gut microbiota and rheumatic diseases. Standardised mean difference (SMD) of α-diversity indices between rheumatic diseases and controls were estimated using random-effects model. β-diversity indices and relative abundance of gut microbes were summarised qualitatively.
FINDINGS
Of the included 92 studies (11,998 participants), 68 provided data for α-diversity. Taken together as a whole, decreases in α-diversity indices were consistently found in rheumatic diseases (observed species: SMD = -0.36, [95%CI = -0.63, -0.09]; Chao1: SMD = -0.57, [95%CI = -0.88, -0.26]; Shannon index: SMD = -0.33, [95%CI = -0.48, -0.17]; Simpson index: SMD = -0.32, [95%CI = -0.49, -0.14]). However, when specific rheumatic diseases were examined, decreases were only observed in rheumatoid arthritis (observed species: SMD = -0.51, [95%CI = -0.78, -0.24]; Shannon index: SMD = -0.31, [95%CI = -0.49, -0.13]; Simpson index: SMD = -0.31, [95%CI = -0.54, -0.08]), systemic lupus erythematosus (Chao1: SMD = -1.60, [95%CI = -2.54, -0.66]; Shannon index: SMD = -0.63, [95%CI = -1.08, -0.18]), gout (Simpson index: SMD = -0.64, [95%CI = -1.07, -0.22]) and fibromyalgia (Simpson index: SMD = -0.28, [95%CI = -0.44, -0.11]), whereas an increase was observed in systemic sclerosis (Shannon index: SMD = 1.25, [95%CI = 0.09, 2.41]). Differences with statistical significance in β-diversity were consistently reported in ankylosing spondylitis and IgG4-related diseases. Although little evidence of disease specificity of gut microbes was found, shared alterations of the depletion of anti-inflammatory butyrate-producing microbe (i.e., Faecalibacterium) and the enrichment of pro-inflammatory microbe (i.e., Streptococcus) were observed in rheumatoid arthritis, Sjögren's syndrome and systemic lupus erythematosus.
INTERPRETATION
Gut microbiota dysbiosis was associated with rheumatic diseases, principally with potentially non-specific, shared alterations of microbes.
FUNDING
National Natural Science Foundation of China (81930071, 81902265, 82072502 and U21A20352).
Topics: Dysbiosis; Gastrointestinal Microbiome; Humans; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic; Rheumatic Diseases; Sjogren's Syndrome
PubMed: 35594658
DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104055 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jan 2018Approximately one-third of individuals with interstitial lung disease (ILD) have associated connective tissue disease (CTD). The connective tissue disorders most... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Approximately one-third of individuals with interstitial lung disease (ILD) have associated connective tissue disease (CTD). The connective tissue disorders most commonly associated with ILD include scleroderma/systemic sclerosis (SSc), rheumatoid arthritis, polymyositis/dermatomyositis, and Sjögren's syndrome. Although many people with CTD-ILD do not develop progressive lung disease, a significant proportion do progress, leading to reduced physical function, decreased quality of life, and death. ILD is now the major cause of death amongst individuals with systemic sclerosis.Cyclophosphamide is a highly potent immunosuppressant that has demonstrated efficacy in inducing and maintaining remission in autoimmune and inflammatory illnesses. However this comes with potential toxicities, including nausea, haemorrhagic cystitis, bladder cancer, bone marrow suppression, increased risk of opportunistic infections, and haematological and solid organ malignancies.Decision-making in the treatment of individuals with CTD-ILD is difficult; the clinician needs to identify those who will develop progressive disease, and to weigh up the balance between a high level of need for therapy in a severely unwell patient population against the potential for adverse effects from highly toxic therapy, for which only relatively limited data on efficacy can be found. Similarly, it is not clear whether histological subtype, disease duration, or disease extent can be used to predict treatment responsiveness.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the efficacy and adverse effects of cyclophosphamide in the treatment of individuals with CTD-ILD.
SEARCH METHODS
We performed searches on CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science up to May 2017. We handsearched review articles, clinical trial registries, and reference lists of retrieved articles.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled parallel-group trials that compared cyclophosphamide in any form, used individually or concomitantly with other immunomodulating therapies, versus non-cyclophosphamide-containing therapies for at least six months, with follow-up of at least 12 months from the start of treatment.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We imported studies identified by the search into a reference manager database. We retrieved the full-text versions of relevant studies, and two review authors independently extracted data. Primary outcomes were change in lung function (change in forced vital capacity (FVC) % predicted and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) % predicted), adverse events, and health-related quality of life measures. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, dyspnoea, cough, and functional exercise testing. When appropriate, we performed meta-analyses and subgroup analyses by severity of lung function, connective tissue disease diagnosis, and radiological pattern of fibrosis. We assessed the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach and created 'Summary of findings' tables.
MAIN RESULTS
We included in the analysis four trials with 495 participants (most with systemic sclerosis). We formed two separate comparisons: cyclophosphamide versus placebo (two trials, 195 participants) and cyclophosphamide versus mycophenolate (two trials, 300 participants). We found evidence to be of low quality, as dropout rates were high in the intervention groups, and as we noted a wide confidence interval around the effect with small differences, which affected the precision of results.The data demonstrates significant improvement in lung function with cyclophosphamide compared with placebo (post-treatment FVC % mean difference (MD) 2.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80 to 4.87; P = 0.006) but no significant difference in post-treatment DLCO (% MD -1.68, 95% CI -4.37 to 1.02; P = 0.22; two trials, 182 participants).Risk of adverse effects was increased in the cyclophosphamide treatment groups compared with the placebo groups, in particular, haematuria, leukopenia, and nausea, leading to a higher rate of withdrawal from cyclophosphamide treatment. The data demonstrates statistically significant improvement in one-measure of quality of life in one trial favouring cyclophosphamide over placebo and clinically and statistically significant improvement in breathlessness in one trial favouring cyclophosphamide compared with placebo, with no significant impact on mortality.Trialists reported no significant impact on lung function when cyclophosphamide was used compared with mycophenolate at 12 months (FVC % MD -0.82, 95% CI -3.95 to 2.31; P = 0.61; two trials, 149 participants; DLCO % MD -1.41, 95% CI -10.40 to 7.58; P = 0.76; two trials, 149 participants).Risk of side effects was increased with cyclophosphamide versus mycophenolate, in particular, leukopenia and thrombocytopenia.The data demonstrates no significant impact on health-related quality of life, all-cause mortality, dyspnoea, or cough severity in the cyclophosphamide group compared with the mycophenolate group. No trials reported outcomes associated with functional exercise tests.We performed subgroup analysis to determine whether severity of lung function, connective tissue disease diagnosis, or radiological pattern had any impact on outcomes. One trial reported that cyclophosphamide protected against decreased FVC in individuals with worse fibrosis scores, and also showed that cyclophosphamide may be more effective in those with worse lung function. No association could be made between connective tissue disease diagnosis and outcomes.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
This review, which is based on studies of varying methodological quality, demonstrates that overall, in this population, small benefit may be derived from the use of cyclophosphamide in terms of mean difference in % FVC when compared with placebo, but not of the difference in % DLCO, or when compared with mycophenolate. Modest clinical improvement in dyspnoea may be noted with the use of cyclophosphamide. Clinical practice guidelines should advise clinicians to consider individual patient characteristics and to expect only modest benefit at best in preserving FVC. Clinicians should carefully monitor for adverse effects during treatment and in the years thereafter.Further studies are required to examine the use of cyclophosphamide; they should be adequately powered to compare outcomes within different subgroups, specifically, stratified for extent of pulmonary infiltrates on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and skin involvement in SSc. Studies on other forms of connective tissue disease are needed. Researchers may consider comparing cyclophosphamide (a potent immunosuppressant) versus antifibrotic agents, or comparing both versus placebo, in particular, for those with evidence of rapidly progressive fibrotic disease, who may benefit the most.
Topics: Connective Tissue Diseases; Cyclophosphamide; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Lung; Lung Diseases, Interstitial; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Scleroderma, Systemic; Vital Capacity
PubMed: 29297205
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010908.pub2 -
Clinical Rheumatology Feb 2023The aim of this study was to analyze the risk factors for primary Sjögren's Syndrome (pSS) by conducting a meta-analysis of observational studies. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this study was to analyze the risk factors for primary Sjögren's Syndrome (pSS) by conducting a meta-analysis of observational studies.
METHODS
Four electronic databases were searched from inception to August 2022. The search strategy included medical subject headings (MeSH) and text words. Outcomes were calculated and reported as the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).
RESULTS
Twelve studies consisting of nine case-control and three cohort studies were analyzed. Significant positive relationships between infection, a family history of autoimmune disease in first-degree relatives, negative stressful life events, CGGGG insertion/deletion polymorphisms in the IRF5 gene and the onset of pSS were found, with pooled ORs and 95% CIs of 2.73 (1.93, 3.86), 5.93 (3.34, 10.52), 1.69 (1.27, 2.24) and 2.69 (1.97, 3.66), respectively. In contrast, the results showed that a history of smoking was not associated with the onset of pSS, with a pooled OR and 95% CI of 1.39 (0.76, 2.53). However, a statistically significant negative association between current smoking and pSS was detected, with a pooled OR and 95% CI of 0.4 (0.29, 0.83).
CONCLUSIONS
Our research indicated that infection, a family history of autoimmune disease in first-degree relatives, negative stressful life events and CGGGG insertion/deletion polymorphisms in the IRF5 gene might be risk factors for pSS. In contrast, our study demonstrated that a history of smoking was not associated with the onset of pSS, whereas current smoking was negatively associated with pSS onset.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
We registered this review on INPLASY ( https://inplasy.com/ ) under registration number INPLASY202230005.
Topics: Humans; Sjogren's Syndrome; Risk Factors; Polymorphism, Genetic; Smoking; Interferon Regulatory Factors; Observational Studies as Topic
PubMed: 36534351
DOI: 10.1007/s10067-022-06474-8 -
Rheumatology (Oxford, England) Dec 2015To reach a European consensus on the definition and characterization of the main organ-specific extraglandular manifestations in primary SS.
OBJECTIVE
To reach a European consensus on the definition and characterization of the main organ-specific extraglandular manifestations in primary SS.
METHODS
The EULAR-SS Task Force Group steering committee agreed to approach SS-related systemic involvement according to the EULAR SS Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI) classification and proposed the preparation of four separate manuscripts: articular, cutaneous, pulmonary and renal ESSDAI involvement; muscular, peripheral nervous system, CNS and haematological ESSDAI involvement; organs not included in the ESSDAI classification; and lymphoproliferative disease. Currently available evidence was obtained by a systematic literature review focused on SS-related systemic features.
RESULTS
The following information was summarized for articular, cutaneous, pulmonary and renal involvement: a clear, consensual definition of the clinical feature, a brief epidemiological description including an estimate of the prevalence reported in the main clinical series and a brief list of the key clinical and diagnostic features that could help physicians clearly identify these features. Unfortunately we found that the body of evidence relied predominantly on information retrieved from individual cases, and the scientific information provided was heterogeneous. The analysis of types of involvement was biased due to the unbalanced reporting of severe cases over non-severe cases, although the main sources of bias were the heterogeneous definitions of organ involvement (or even the lack of definition in some studies) and the heterogeneous diagnostic approach used in studies to investigate involvment of each organ.
CONCLUSION
The proposals included in this article are a first step to developing an optimal diagnostic approach to systemic involvement in primary SS and may pave the way for further development of evidence-based diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines.
Topics: Adult; Advisory Committees; Europe; Evidence-Based Medicine; Female; Humans; Joint Diseases; Kidney Diseases; Lung Diseases; Male; Middle Aged; Prevalence; Prognosis; Severity of Illness Index; Sjogren's Syndrome; Skin Diseases
PubMed: 26231345
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev200 -
Annals of Hepatology 2022We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the prevalence of concomitant Sjögren's syndrome (SS) with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) in adults... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the prevalence of concomitant Sjögren's syndrome (SS) with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) in adults and quantify the impact of SS on PBC.
METHODS
PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane library were searched using subject terms and predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria.
RESULTS
Seventeen articles were included. The prevalence of SS in PBC patients ranged from 3.5 to 73% (35% pooled) (95% CI: 28-41%; p < 0.01). Seven studies included various biochemical indicators, including alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), γ-glutamyltransferase (γ-GT), total bilirubin (TBiL), albumin (ALB) and platelet (PLT), and immunological indexes including IgG, IgM, antinuclear antibody (ANA), anti-mitochondrial antibody (AMA), AMA-M2 and anti-Ro/Sjögren's syndrome antigen A (SSA) antibodies. Meta-analysis showed that there were no significant differences in ALT, AST, ALP, γ-GT, TBiL and IgM levels between PBS and PBC with SS. Pooled analysis showed that ALB (MD=0.82; 95% CI: 0.08-1.56) and PLT (MD=30.41; 95% CI: 10.16-50.66) levels were lower, IgG levels (MD=-1.55; 95% CI: -2.39 to -0.72) were higher, and the positive ratios of ANA (RR=0.92; 95% CI: 0.87-0.98), AMA (RR=0.94; 95% CI: 0.89-0.98), AMA-M2 (RR=0.77; 95% CI: 0.70-0.85) and anti-Ro/SSA antibodies (RR=0.29; 95% CI: 0.08-1.01) were significantly higher in PBC patients with SS than in PBC patients.
CONCLUSIONS
Our study confirms that SS is common in PBC. Comorbid SS appears to influence the clinical phenotype of PBC and may therefore influence the management of PBC.
Topics: Humans; Sjogren's Syndrome; Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary; Autoantibodies; Prevalence; Antibodies, Antinuclear; gamma-Glutamyltransferase; Alkaline Phosphatase; Alanine Transaminase; Immunoglobulin M; Immunoglobulin G
PubMed: 35970319
DOI: 10.1016/j.aohep.2022.100746