-
Epilepsy Research Aug 2021Statin use for the prevention of seizure and epilepsy had been suggested but remained controversial. We sought to search existing literature to determine whether... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
Statin use for the prevention of seizure and epilepsy had been suggested but remained controversial. We sought to search existing literature to determine whether prophylactic use of statin reduced the incidence of seizure and epilepsy in the patients at risk.
METHODS
Three electronic databases were thoroughly searched to identify clinical studies investigating the effects of statin use on patients at the risk of seizure or epilepsy. Regardless of heterogeneity quantified, a random effects meta-analyses were used to synthesize the evidence, to pool odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS
Seven cohort studies involving 26,042 patients with newly-onset epileptogenic brain insults and no history of seizure and epilepsy before were included. Compared with patients didn't receive statin treatment after epileptogenic brain insults, those treated with statin had a lower risk of epilepsy (5 studies; 22,849 patients; pooled OR, 0.48; 95 % CI, 0.31 to 0.73; p = 0.001) and seizure (4 studies; 6076 subjects; pooled OR, 0.35; 95 % CI, 0.25 to 0.48; p = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Evidence from this meta-analysis suggested that the use of statin should as primary prevention for patients with risk of seizures and epilepsy. Considering the limited number and quality of available studies, future randomized controlled trials are required to further demonstrate the association between statin use and incident of seizure and epilepsy.
Topics: Anticonvulsants; Cohort Studies; Epilepsies, Partial; Epilepsy; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Seizures
PubMed: 33971584
DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2021.106652 -
Journal of Child Neurology Nov 2017Limited data exist for health care providers regarding seizure recurrence after a first unprovoked seizure in previously neurologically and developmentally normal... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Limited data exist for health care providers regarding seizure recurrence after a first unprovoked seizure in previously neurologically and developmentally normal children. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess seizure recurrence after a first unprovoked seizure by performing an electronic search in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. Six studies from 2817 met the inclusion criteria. The sample size consisted of 815 neurologically and developmentally normal children (1 month-17.5 years) on no antiepileptic drugs. This systematic review and meta-analysis estimated a recurrence rate within 3 years of 45% (95% CI: 37%, 60%). This estimate provides a touchstone for health care providers who are managing this particular population of children.
Topics: Adolescent; Child; Child, Preschool; Humans; Infant; Recurrence; Seizures
PubMed: 28879801
DOI: 10.1177/0883073817726461 -
Seizure Nov 2023Despite many new ASM, the rate of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) has not changed. Cenobamate (CNB) is a novel ASM for the treatment of focal-onset seizures... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
Despite many new ASM, the rate of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) has not changed. Cenobamate (CNB) is a novel ASM for the treatment of focal-onset seizures in adults with high seizure freedom rates in randomized controlled trials (RCT). Although CNB appears to be effective, it is not commonly prescribed to patients with DRE, resulting in a lack of "real-world data".
METHODS
To evaluate the real-world effect of CNB and to assess the generalizability of RCT data, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. Pooled proportions were calculated using a random intercept logistic regression model.
RESULTS
The analysis included seven studies with a total of 229 patients with DRE, 77.3 % of whom were adults and 91.5 % had focal-onset seizures. Seizure reduction >50 % was achieved in 68 % of patients [54.54; 79.07], with seizure freedom in 16.2 % [8.38; 28.97]. There was no difference between pediatric and adult patients. CNB was discontinued in 10 % [6.74; 14.6] of patients, mostly due to lack of efficacy (39 %) or adverse effects (AE, 43 %). AE, observed in 57.3 % [39.7; 73.2] of patients, included fatigue and vertigo. A comparison of the rates calculated in this meta-analysis to the active arm of equivalent RCTs revealed no significant difference.
CONCLUSION
CNB achieves a good treatment response in patients with DRE in real-world settings, like the effect reported in RCTs. The high heterogeneity between studies calls for studies focusing on specific DRE subpopulations.
Topics: Adult; Child; Humans; Anticonvulsants; Carbamates; Drug Resistant Epilepsy; Seizures; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37713961
DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2023.09.006 -
Neurosurgery Nov 2022Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) surgery is associated with the best seizure outcome in adults, although its long-term results remain suboptimal. Retrospective pediatric... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) surgery is associated with the best seizure outcome in adults, although its long-term results remain suboptimal. Retrospective pediatric studies suggest better figures whose determinants are poorly understood.
OBJECTIVE
To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on the efficacy of TLE surgery in children (age younger than 18 years) and adults.
METHODS
We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library for TLE surgery original research from January 1, 1990, until May 12, 2020. The outcome measures were seizure freedom since surgery and seizure freedom either at last or longest follow-up. We meta-analyzed the proportion of children and adults achieving either Engel I/International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) 1 or Engel IA/ILAE 1A outcome by follow-up duration, type of surgery, histopathology, neuroimaging, quality of the studies, and publication period. We used a random effects model with Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation of proportions.
RESULTS
From 40 409 records identified, we included 277 studies (30 848 patients). The proportions of patients achieving Engel I/ILAE 1 and Engel IA/ILAE 1A outcomes were 0.74 (95% CI, 0.69-0.78) and 0.61 (0.48-0.74) for children and 0.69 (0.67-0.71) and 0.56 (0.52-0.60) for adults. Histopathology significantly influenced Engel I/ILAE 1 outcome in adults but not in children ( P < .0001), while the type of surgery significantly influenced Engel I/ILAE 1 outcome in children but not in adults.
CONCLUSION
The proportion of seizure freedom after TLE surgery was higher in children, although not significantly. Histopathology and the surgical approach can influence seizure outcome, with age-related variability.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Child; Epilepsy; Epilepsy, Temporal Lobe; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Seizures; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35960753
DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002094 -
The Journal of ECT Dec 2015The optimum induction agent for anesthesia for electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has been long debated. Ideal agent should be short acting with minimal suppression of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
UNLABELLED
The optimum induction agent for anesthesia for electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has been long debated. Ideal agent should be short acting with minimal suppression of seizure potentials. Recent studies have suggested longer seizure duration with etomidate in comparison to propofol, thiopental, and methohexital. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to pool data available from studies comparing systematically the efficacy of etomidate against other induction agents in terms of seizure duration (both electroencephalography (EEG) and motor).
METHODS
We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane registry for trials evaluating etomidate against methohexital, propofol, or thiopental for duration of EEG or motor seizure in patients undergoing ECT. Specific adverse effects reported were also identified.
RESULTS
Seventeen trials were identified involving 704, 84, 2491, and 258 setting of ECT using etomidate, methohexital, thiopental, and propofol, respectively. In the etomidate group, pooled EEG seizure duration was longer by 2.23 seconds (95% confidence interval [CI], -3.62 to 8.01; P = 0.456) than methohexital, longer by 17.65 seconds (95% CI, 9.72-25.57; P < 0.001) than propofol, and longer by 11.81 seconds (95% CI, 4.26-19.35; P = 0.003) than thiopental. Pooled motor seizure duration was longer in etomidate group by 1.45 seconds (95% CI, -4.79 to 7.69; P = 0.649) than methohexital, longer by 11.13 seconds (95% CI, 6.64-15.62; P < 0.001) than propofol, and longer by 3.60 seconds (95% CI, 2.15-5.06; P < 0.001) than thiopental. Myoclonus (6 trials) and painful injection (4 trials) were commonest adverse effects with etomidate.
CONCLUSIONS
Etomidate is clearly better in terms of seizure duration potential (both motor and EEG) than propofol and thiopental. Superiority/inferiority over methohexital could not be demonstrated with the presently available literature.
Topics: Electroconvulsive Therapy; Electroencephalography; Etomidate; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Seizures
PubMed: 25634566
DOI: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000212 -
Journal of Neurosurgery Apr 2016Conflicting conclusions have been reported regarding several factors that may predict seizure outcomes after hemispheric surgery for refractory epilepsy. The goal of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
Conflicting conclusions have been reported regarding several factors that may predict seizure outcomes after hemispheric surgery for refractory epilepsy. The goal of this study was to identify the possible predictors of seizure outcome by pooling the rates of postoperative seizure freedom found in the published literature.
METHODS
A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library identified English-language articles published since 1970 that describe seizure outcomes in patients who underwent hemispheric surgery for refractory epilepsy. Two reviewers independently assessed article eligibility and extracted the data. The authors pooled rates of seizure freedom from papers included in the study. Eight potential prognostic variables were identified and dichotomized for analyses. The authors also compared continuous variables within seizure-free and seizure-recurrent groups. Random- or fixed-effects models were used in the analyses depending on the presence or absence of heterogeneity.
RESULTS
The pooled seizure-free rate among the 1528 patients (from 56 studies) who underwent hemispheric surgery was 73%. Patients with an epilepsy etiology of developmental disorders, generalized seizures, nonlateralization on electroencephalography, and contralateral MRI abnormalities had reduced odds of being seizure-free after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS
Hemispheric surgery is an effective therapeutic modality for medically intractable epilepsy. This meta-analysis provides useful evidence-based information for the selection of candidates for hemispheric surgery, presurgical counseling, and explanation of seizure outcomes.
Topics: Drug Resistant Epilepsy; Hemispherectomy; Humans; Neurosurgical Procedures; Predictive Value of Tests; Seizures; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 26495944
DOI: 10.3171/2015.4.JNS14438 -
Epilepsy & Behavior : E&B May 2023Different neurostimulation modalities are available to treat drug-resistant focal epilepsy when surgery is not an option including vagus nerve stimulation (VNS),... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
Different neurostimulation modalities are available to treat drug-resistant focal epilepsy when surgery is not an option including vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), responsive neurostimulation (RNS), and deep brain stimulation (DBS). Head-to-head comparisons of efficacy do not exist between them nor are likely to be available in the future. We performed a meta-analysis on VNS, RNS, and DBS outcomes to compare seizure reduction efficacy for focal epilepsy.
METHODS
We systematically reviewed the literature for reported seizure outcomes following implantation with VNS, RNS, and DBS in focal-onset seizures and performed a meta-analysis. Prospective or retrospective clinical studies were included.
RESULTS
Sufficient data were available at years one (n = 642, two (n = 480), and three (n = 385) for comparing the three modalities with each other. Seizure reduction for the devices at years one, two, and three respectively were: RNS: 66.3%, 56.0%, 68.4%; DBS- 58.4%, 57.5%, 63.8%; VNS 32.9%, 44.4%, 53.5%. Seizure reduction at year one was greater for RNS (p < 0.01) and DBS (p < 0.01) compared to VNS.
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings indicate the seizure reduction efficacy of RNS is similar to DBS, and both had greater seizure reductions compared to VNS in the first-year post-implantation, with the differences diminishing with longer-term follow-up.
SIGNIFICANCE
The results help guide neuromodulation treatment in eligible patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy.
Topics: Humans; Retrospective Studies; Prospective Studies; Deep Brain Stimulation; Epilepsies, Partial; Drug Resistant Epilepsy; Seizures; Vagus Nerve Stimulation; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36972642
DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2023.109182 -
Seizure Sep 2015To evaluate the efficacy of surgery with neuronavigation compared to conventional neurosurgical treatment of epilepsy in terms of safety and seizure outcomes and to... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
To evaluate the efficacy of surgery with neuronavigation compared to conventional neurosurgical treatment of epilepsy in terms of safety and seizure outcomes and to assess the quality of the evidence base of neuronavigation in this clinical context.
METHOD
Systematic review using the electronic databases of Cochrane, CRD, PubMed, Embase, SciELO and LILACS in Portuguese, English and Spanish. The [MeSH] terms included "epilepsy" and "neuronavigation".
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Studies assessing surgery with neuronavigation for the surgical treatment of epilepsy or brain injuries associated with epileptic seizures.
RESULTS
We identified 28 original articles. All articles yielded scientific evidence of low quality. Outcome data presented in the articles identified was heterogeneous and did not amount to compelling evidence that epilepsy surgery with neuronavigation produces higher rates of seizure control, a reduced need for reoperations, or lower rates of complications or postoperative neurological deficits.
CONCLUSION
We were unable to find any publications providing convincing evidence that neuronavigation improves outcomes of epilepsy surgery. Whilst this does not mean that neuronavigation cannot improve neurosurgical outcomes in this clinical setting, well-designed research studies evaluating the role of neuronavigation are urgently needed.
Topics: Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Epilepsy; Humans; Neuronavigation; Review Literature as Topic; Seizures
PubMed: 26362385
DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2015.07.010 -
Journal of the Neurological Sciences Sep 2021Epilepsy can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Seizure detection devices could be invaluable tools for both people with epilepsy, their caregivers,... (Review)
Review
IMPORTANCE
Epilepsy can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Seizure detection devices could be invaluable tools for both people with epilepsy, their caregivers, and clinicians as they could alert caretakers about seizures, reduce the risk of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy, and provide objective and more reliable seizure tracking to guide treatment decisions or monitor outcomes in clinical trials.
OBJECTIVE
To synthesize the characteristics of commercial seizure detection tools/devices currently available.
METHODS
We performed a systematic search utilizing a diverse set of resources to identify commercially available seizure detection products for consumer use. Performance data was obtained through a systematic review on commercially available products.
OBSERVATIONS
We identified 23 products marketed for seizure detection/alerting. Devices utilize a variety of mechanisms to detect seizures, including movement detectors, autonomic change detectors, electroencephalogram (EEG) based detectors, and other mechanisms (audio). The optimal device for a person with epilepsy depends on a variety of factors including the main purpose of the device, their age, seizure type and personal preferences. Only 8 devices have published peer-reviewed performance data and the majority for tonic-clonic seizures. An informed conversation between the clinician and the patient can help guide if a seizure detection device is appropriate.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
Seizure detection devices have a potential to reduce morbidity and mortality for certain people with epilepsy. Clinicians should be familiar with the characteristics of commercially available devices to best counsel their patients on whether a seizure detection device may be beneficial and what the optimal devices may be.
Topics: Autonomic Nervous System; Communication; Electroencephalography; Humans; Movement; Seizures
PubMed: 34419933
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2021.117611 -
Seizure May 2023To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify whether tuberectomy and tuberectomy plus are associated with different postoperative seizure outcomes in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Influence of resective extent of epileptogenic tuber on seizure outcome in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex-related epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVE
To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify whether tuberectomy and tuberectomy plus are associated with different postoperative seizure outcomes in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) -related epilepsy.
METHODS
Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Proquest, Web of Science, Scopus, Biosis Previews) were searched without date restriction. Retrospective cohort studies of participants with TSC-associated epilepsy undergoing resective surgery that reported demographics, presurgical evaluation, extent of resection and postoperative seizure outcomes were included. Title, abstract and the full text were checked independently and in duplicate by two reviewers. Disagreements were resolved through discussion. One author extracted data which was verified by a second author using identified common standard in advance, including using a risk of bias tool we agreed on to evaluate study quality.
RESULTS
Five studies, with a total of 327 participants, were included. One hundred and sixty patients received tuberectomy, and 93 of them (58.1%) achieved postoperative seizure freedom, while the other 167 patients underwent tuberectomy plus, and 128 of them (76.6%) achieved seizure freedom after adequate follow-ups (RR=0.72, 95% CI [0.60, 0.87], P<0.05). Subgroup analysis found that 40 of 63 (63.5%) patients after tuberectomy and 66 of 78 (84.6%) patients after tuberectomy plus of a single tuber achieved seizure freedom (RR = 0.71, 95% CI [0.56,0.91], P<0.05). In the multituber subrgroup, 16 of 42 (38.1%) and 21 of 31 (67.7%) patients achieved seizure freedom, after tuberectomy and tuberectomy plus, respectively (RR = 0.57, 95% CI [0.32,1.03], P = 0.06).
CONCLUSIONS
Tuberectomy plus is a more effective treatment than tuberectomy for patients with TSC-related intractable epilepsy.
Topics: Humans; Retrospective Studies; Tuberous Sclerosis; Electroencephalography; Seizures; Epilepsy; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37116294
DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2023.04.002