-
The Journal of Laryngology and Otology Jul 2016To undertake a systematic review of the role of microsurgery, in relation to observation and stereotactic radiation, in the management of small vestibular schwannomas... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To undertake a systematic review of the role of microsurgery, in relation to observation and stereotactic radiation, in the management of small vestibular schwannomas with serviceable hearing.
METHODS
The Medline database was searched for publications that included the terms 'vestibular schwannoma' and/or 'acoustic neuroma', occurring in conjunction with 'hearing'. Articles were manually screened to identify those concerning vestibular schwannomas under 1.5 cm in greatest dimension. Thereafter, only publications discussing both pre-operative and post-operative hearing were considered.
RESULTS
Twenty-six papers were identified. Observation is an acceptable strategy for small tumours with slow growth where hearing preservation is not a consideration. In contrast, microsurgery, including the middle fossa approach, may provide excellent hearing outcomes, particularly when a small tumour has begun to cause hearing loss. Immediate post-operative hearing usually predicts long-term hearing. Recent data on stereotactic radiation suggest long-term deterioration of hearing following definitive therapy.
CONCLUSION
In patients under the age of 65 years with small vestibular schwannomas, microsurgery via the middle fossa approach offers durable preservation of hearing.
Topics: Hearing Loss; Humans; Microsurgery; Neuroma, Acoustic; Radiosurgery; Treatment Outcome; Tumor Burden; Watchful Waiting
PubMed: 27198728
DOI: 10.1017/S0022215116007969 -
Otolaryngology--head and Neck Surgery :... Nov 2015The auditory brainstem implant (ABI) was initially developed for patients with deafness as a result of neurofibromatosis type 2. ABI indications have recently extended... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
The auditory brainstem implant (ABI) was initially developed for patients with deafness as a result of neurofibromatosis type 2. ABI indications have recently extended to children with congenital deafness who are not cochlear implant candidates. Few multi-institutional outcome data exist. Herein, we aim to provide a systematic review of outcomes following implantation of the ABI in pediatric patients with nontumor diagnosis, with a focus on audiometric outcomes.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane.
REVIEW METHODS
A systematic review of literature was performed using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) recommendations. Variables assessed included age at implantation, diagnosis, medical history, cochlear implant history, radiographic findings, ABI device implanted, surgical approach, complications, side effects, and auditory outcomes.
RESULTS
The initial search identified 304 articles; 21 met inclusion criteria for a total of 162 children. The majority of these patients had cochlear nerve aplasia (63.6%, 103 of 162). Cerebrospinal fluid leak occurred in up to 8.5% of cases. Audiometric outcomes improved over time. After 5 years, almost 50% of patients reached Categories of Auditory Performance scores >4; however, patients with nonauditory disabilities did not demonstrate a similar increase in scores.
CONCLUSION
ABI surgery is a reasonable option for the habilitation of deaf children who are not cochlear implant candidates. Although improvement in Categories of Auditory Performance scores was seen across studies, pediatric ABI users with nonauditory disabilities have inferior audiometric outcomes.
Topics: Auditory Brain Stem Implants; Child; Deafness; Humans; Neurofibromatosis 2; Speech Perception; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 26227469
DOI: 10.1177/0194599815596929 -
The Journal of Laryngology and Otology Nov 2023Stereotactic radiosurgery has been shown to be an effective method of managing vestibular schwannomas. The primary aim here is to establish the impact of pre-treatment... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Stereotactic radiosurgery has been shown to be an effective method of managing vestibular schwannomas. The primary aim here is to establish the impact of pre-treatment fast-growing vestibular schwannomas on the efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery.
METHODS
PubMed, Medline and Embase databases were used. The ROBINS-I ('Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions') tool was utilised to assess for risk of bias. Proportionate meta-analysis and sub-analysis for fast-growing tumours were performed to explore the success rate of stereotactic radiosurgery in stabilising or decreasing the tumour burden in vestibular schwannomas.
RESULTS
Four moderate risk studies were included in the analysis. Overall, 91 per cent (95 per cent confidence interval = 0.83-0.97, < 0.01, = 80 per cent) of the tumours demonstrated successful size reduction or stabilisation following stereotactic radiosurgery. Nevertheless, the efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery in reducing or stabilising fast-growing vestibular schwannomas decreased by 79 per cent (95 per cent confidence interval = 0.64-0.91, = 0.11, = 62 per cent).
CONCLUSION
Stereotactic radiosurgery has a statistically significant success rate in stabilising or decreasing the vestibular schwannoma size. This success rate is diminished in fast-growing vestibular schwannomas.
Topics: Humans; Neuroma, Acoustic; Radiosurgery; Microsurgery
PubMed: 37194631
DOI: 10.1017/S0022215123000786 -
Neuro-oncology Practice Dec 2021Differences in long-term outcomes of single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) between gamma knife (GK) and linear accelerator (LINAC) systems for vestibular... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Differences in long-term outcomes of single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) between gamma knife (GK) and linear accelerator (LINAC) systems for vestibular schwannoma (VS) management remain unclear. To investigate differences in safety and efficacy between modalities, we conducted a meta-analysis of studies over the past decade.
METHODS
MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were queried for studies with the following inclusion criteria: English language, published between January 2010 and April 2020, cohort size ≥30, and mean/median follow-up ≥5 years. Odds ratios (OR) compared rates of tumor control, hearing preservation, and cranial nerve toxicities before and after SRS.
RESULTS
Thirty-nine studies were included (29 GK, 10 LINAC) with 6516 total patients. Tumor control rates were 93% (95% CI 91-94%) and 94% (95% CI 91-97%) for GK and LINAC, respectively. Both GK (OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.02-0.13) and LINAC (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.29-0.76) reduced odds of serviceable hearing. Neither GK (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.41-1.22) nor LINAC (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.64-2.00) impacted facial nerve function. GK decreased odds of trigeminal nerve (TN) impairment (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.32-0.94) while LINAC did not impact TN function (OR 1.45, 95% CI 0.81-2.61). Lastly, LINAC offered decreased odds of tinnitus (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.03-0.87) not observed with GK (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.48-1.01).
CONCLUSIONS
VS tumor control and hearing preservation rates are comparable between GK and LINAC SRS. GK may better preserve TN function, while LINAC decreases tinnitus rates. Future studies are warranted to investigate the efficacy of GK and LINAC SRS more directly.
PubMed: 34777833
DOI: 10.1093/nop/npab052 -
Journal of Neuro-oncology Oct 2023To perform a systematic review of literature specific to single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for large vestibular schwannomas (VS), maximum... (Review)
Review
Single-fraction radiosurgery outcomes for large vestibular schwannomas in the upfront or post-surgical setting: a systematic review and International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS) Practice Guidelines.
PURPOSE
To perform a systematic review of literature specific to single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for large vestibular schwannomas (VS), maximum diameter ≥ 2.5 cm and/or classified as Koos Grade IV, and to present consensus recommendations on behalf of the International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS).
METHODS
The Medline and Embase databases were used to apply the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) approach. We considered eligible prospective and retrospective studies, written in the English language, reporting treatment outcomes for large VS; SRS for large post-operative tumors were analyzed in aggregate and separately.
RESULTS
19 of the 229 studies initially identified met the final inclusion criteria. Overall crude rate of tumor control was 89% (93.7% with no prior surgery vs 87.7% with prior surgery). Rates of salvage microsurgical resection, need for shunt, and additional SRS in all series versus those with no prior surgery were 9.6% vs 3.3%, 4.7% vs 6.4% and 1% vs 0.9%, respectively. Rates of facial palsy and hearing preservation in all series versus those with no prior surgery were 1.3% vs 3.4% and 34.2% vs 40.4%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Upfront SRS resulted in high rates of tumor control with acceptable rates of facial palsy and hearing preservation as compared to the results in those series including patients with prior surgery (level C evidence). Therefore, although large VS are considered classic indication for microsurgical resection, upfront SRS can be considered in selected patients and we recommend a prescribed marginal dose from 11 to 13 Gy (level C evidence).
Topics: Humans; Radiosurgery; Retrospective Studies; Neuroma, Acoustic; Prospective Studies; Facial Paralysis; Treatment Outcome; Follow-Up Studies
PubMed: 37843727
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04455-8 -
World Neurosurgery Apr 2022A meta-analysis of patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma (VS) primarily treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or microsurgery (MS) was performed, and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Primary Treatment of Small to Medium (<3 cm) Sporadic Vestibular Schwannomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Hearing Preservation and Tumor Control Rates for Microsurgery versus Radiosurgery.
BACKGROUND
A meta-analysis of patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma (VS) primarily treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or microsurgery (MS) was performed, and hearing preservation outcome (HPO), tumor control (TC), and facial nerve dysfunction (FND) were analyzed.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted (Medline and Scopus database) for the period January 2010-June 2020 with appropriate MeSH. English language articles for small to medium sporadic VS (<3 cm) using SRS or MS as primary treatment modality, with minimum follow-up of 3 years, were included. Studies had to report an acceptable standardized hearing metric.
RESULTS
Thirty-two studies met the inclusion criteria: 10 MS; 23 radiosurgery, and 1 comparative study included in both. HPO, at approximately 65 months follow-up, were comparable between MS group (10 studies; 809 patients) and SRS group (23 studies; 1234 patients) (56% vs. 59%; P = 0.1527). TC, at approximately 70 months follow-up, was significantly better in the MS group (9 studies; 1635 patients) versus the SRS group (19 studies; 2260 patients) (98% vs. 92%; P < 0.0001). FND, at approximately 12 months follow-up, was significantly higher in the MS group (8 studies; 1101 patients) versus the SRS group (17 studies; 2285 patients) (10% vs. 2%; P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS
MS and SRS are comparable primary treatments for small (<3 cm) sporadic VS with respect to HPO at 5-year follow-up in patients with serviceable hearing at presentation; approximately 50% of patients for both modalities likely lose serviceable hearing by that time point. High TC rates (>90%) were seen with both modalities; MS 98% versus SRS 92%. The posttreatment FND was significantly less with the SRS group (2%) versus the MS group (10%).
Topics: Follow-Up Studies; Hearing; Humans; Microsurgery; Neuroma, Acoustic; Radiosurgery; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34838768
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.11.083 -
Otology & Neurotology : Official... Dec 2017The objective is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature on the long-term results of hearing preservation after vestibular schwannoma... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
The objective is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature on the long-term results of hearing preservation after vestibular schwannoma resection.
DATA SOURCES
Ovid/Medline, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library from January 1980 to January 2015.
STUDY SELECTION
Inclusion criteria: age ≥18 years, minimum 10 patients in the treatment group, hearing preserving microsurgery, no previous radiation treatment, serviceable hearing at immediate postop follow-up, hearing outcomes reported using Gardner Robinson or the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgeons hearing grading scales, and average follow-up of 5 years. Preoperative, immediate postoperative, and last follow-up audiograms were required. Exclusion criteria included neurofibromatosis type 2 patients and surgery for salvage therapy or decompression.
DATA EXTRACTION
Quality evaluated using Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies.
DATA SYNTHESIS
Meta-analysis was performed using R v3.2.2, Metafor package v 1.9-7. Cohen's D was used to determine effect size. Ten reports had at least 5-year follow-up and used standardized hearing grading scales. The systematic review found that if hearing was preserved at Class A or B at early postop visit, the chance of preserving hearing at 5 years was excellent. Those who maintained speech discrimination score ≥ 89% at the early postoperative follow-up had better long-term hearing preservation. The meta-analysis reveals that only preoperative and postoperative pure-tone average was associated with long-term hearing preservation.
CONCLUSION
Long-term (>5 yr) hearing durability rates are generally very good. Most studies do not report patient and tumor characteristics, therefore precluding combining studies for meta-analysis. Only preoperative and postoperative postoperative pure-tone average was associated with long-term hearing durability.
Topics: Adult; Female; Hearing; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neuroma, Acoustic; Postoperative Period; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 29140965
DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001560 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Dec 2014Vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas) are common benign tumours that arise from the Schwann cells of the vestibular nerve. Management options include observation... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas) are common benign tumours that arise from the Schwann cells of the vestibular nerve. Management options include observation with neuroradiological follow-up, microsurgical resection and stereotactic radiotherapy.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effect of stereotactic radiotherapy compared to observation, microsurgical resection, any other treatment modality, or a combination of two or more of the above approaches for vestibular schwannoma.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; PubMed; EMBASE; CINAHL; Web of Science; CAB Abstracts; ISRCTN and additional sources for published and unpublished trials. The date of the search was 24 July 2014.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) exploring the efficacy of stereotactic radiotherapy compared with observation alone, microsurgical resection or any other possible treatment or combination of treatments in patients with a cerebellopontine angle tumour up to 3 cm in diameter, presumed to be a vestibular schwannoma.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used the standard methodological procedures expected by The Cochrane Collaboration.
MAIN RESULTS
No studies met the inclusion criteria for this review.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There is no high quality evidence in the literature from RCTs to determine whether stereotactic radiotherapy is better than microsurgical resection or observation alone for patients with a vestibular schwannoma. In the absence of such evidence, the treatment method should be chosen on an individual basis, taking into consideration the patient's preferences, clinician experience and the availability of radiotherapeutic equipment. With the growing availability of radiotherapeutic equipment, randomised controlled trials should be undertaken to evaluate the role of stereotactic radiotherapy in comparison with other treatment options.
Topics: Humans; Neuroma, Acoustic; Radiosurgery
PubMed: 25511415
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009897.pub2 -
Neuro-oncology Practice Aug 2021Large vestibular schwannomas (VS) pose a treatment challenge for both microsurgery (MS) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Technical developments have allowed for... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Large vestibular schwannomas (VS) pose a treatment challenge for both microsurgery (MS) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Technical developments have allowed for safer irradiation of large tumors. It remains unclear if SRS can achieve appropriate tumor control and acceptable cranial nerve toxicities. In this study, we assess outcomes of irradiation for large VS.
METHODS
PubMed MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane were searched for all the studies assessing SRS outcome in large VS. Primary endpoints included clinical and radiographic tumor control, need for salvage surgery, serviceable hearing, cranial nerve V and VII impairment, presence of hydrocephalus requiring shunting, and presence of vertigo/dizziness.
RESULTS
Twenty-two studies were identified that met selection criteria for analysis from an initial pool of 1272 reports. They were evaluated according to treatment protocol: 1) single-dose SRS (13 studies, 483 patients), 2) combination of MS and SRS (7 studies, 182 patients), and 3) fractionated SRS (3 studies, 82 patients). Tumor control was achieved in 89%, 94%, and 91% of patients, respectively. Odds ratios (ORs) of post- over pretreatment serviceable hearing were 0.42 ( < .01), 0.47 ( = .05), and 0.60 ( = .22); for facial nerve impairment, these ORs were 1.08 ( = .69), 3.45 ( = .28), and 0.87 ( = .71), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
The management of large VS remains challenging. All treatment modalities resulted in high tumor control rates and worsening of pretreatment hearing. None, however, caused significant facial nerve impairment, suggesting that management strategies incorporating focal irradiation can be successful.
PubMed: 34277019
DOI: 10.1093/nop/npab011 -
Acta Otorrinolaringologica Espanola 2024Vestibular schwannoma (VS) is the most common tumour of the cerebellopontine angle. The greater accessibility to radiological tests has increased its diagnosis. Taking...
INTRODUCTION
Vestibular schwannoma (VS) is the most common tumour of the cerebellopontine angle. The greater accessibility to radiological tests has increased its diagnosis. Taking into account the characteristics of the tumour, the symptoms and the age of the patient, three therapeutic strategies have been proposed: observation, surgery or radiotherapy. Choosing the most appropriate for each patient is a frequent source of controversy.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
This paper includes an exhaustive literature review of issues related to VS that can serve as a clinical guide in the management of patients with these lesions. The presentation has been oriented in the form of questions that the clinician usually asks himself and the answers have been written and/or reviewed by a panel of national and international experts consulted by the Otology Commission of the SEORL-CCC.
RESULTS
A list has been compiled containing the 13 most controversial thematic blocks on the management of VS in the form of 50 questions, and answers to all of them have been sought through a systematic literature review (articles published on PubMed and Cochrane Library between 1992 and 2023 related to each thematic area). Thirty-three experts, led by the Otology Committee of SEORL-CCC, have analyzed and discussed all the answers. In Annex 1, 14 additional questions divided into 4 thematic areas can be found.
CONCLUSIONS
This clinical practice guideline on the management of VS offers agreed answers to the most common questions that are asked about this tumour. The absence of sufficient prospective studies means that the levels of evidence on the subject are generally medium or low. This fact increases the interest of this type of clinical practice guidelines prepared by experts.
Topics: Humans; Neuroma, Acoustic; Prospective Studies; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Radiosurgery; Microsurgery
PubMed: 38346489
DOI: 10.1016/j.otoeng.2023.10.005