-
Pituitary Jun 2022To evaluate the association between acromegaly and pregnancy in terms of disease activity, maternal and fetal outcomes. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
To evaluate the association between acromegaly and pregnancy in terms of disease activity, maternal and fetal outcomes.
METHODS
This systematic review was conducted according to the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for systematic reviews of etiology and risk. We focused on observational studies that included pregnant women with acromegaly. The outcomes were acromegaly activity, preterm birth, gestational diabetes, hypertension, eclampsia/preeclampsia, miscarriage, perinatal mortality, low birthweight, small for gestational age, and congenital malformations. Embase, Medline, LILACS, and CENTRAL were our source databases. To perform proportional meta-analyses, we used Stata Statistical Software 17.
RESULTS
Nineteen studies were included encompassing a total of 273 pregnancies in 211 women with acromegaly. The overall frequency of control of acromegaly during pregnancy was 62%, and of tumor growth was 9%. No fetal or maternal deaths were reported. The overall frequency of worsening of previous diabetes or development of gestational diabetes was 9%, and of previous hypertension or preeclampsia/eclampsia was 6%. The overall frequency of premature labor was 9% [from 17 studies of 263 pregnancies; 95% confidence interval (CI), 5-13%]; of spontaneous miscarriage was 4% (from 19 studies of 273 pregnancies; 95% CI, 2-11%); of small for gestational age was 5% (from 15 studies of 216 newborns; 95% CI, 3-9%); and of congenital malformations was 1% (from 18 studies of 240 newborns; 95% CI, 0-7%).
CONCLUSION
Pregnancy in women with acromegaly is frequently associated with disease control and is safe in relation to fetal and maternal outcomes, as in women without acromegaly.
Topics: Abortion, Spontaneous; Acromegaly; Diabetes, Gestational; Eclampsia; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Infant, Newborn; Pre-Eclampsia; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcome; Premature Birth
PubMed: 35098440
DOI: 10.1007/s11102-022-01208-0 -
Journal of Investigative Medicine : the... Aug 2023The therapeutic response heterogeneity in acromegaly persists, despite the medical-surgical advances of recent years. Thus, personalized medicine implementation, which... (Review)
Review
The therapeutic response heterogeneity in acromegaly persists, despite the medical-surgical advances of recent years. Thus, personalized medicine implementation, which focuses on each patient, is justified. Metabolomics would decipher the molecular mechanisms underlying the therapeutic response heterogeneity. Identification of altered metabolic pathways would open new horizons in the therapeutic management of acromegaly. This research aimed to evaluate the metabolomic profile in acromegaly and metabolomics' contributions to understanding disease pathogenesis. A systematic review was carried out by querying four electronic databases and evaluating patients with acromegaly through metabolomic techniques. In all, 21 studies containing 362 patients were eligible. Choline, the ubiquitous metabolite identified in growth hormone (GH)-secreting pituitary adenomas (Pas) by in vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), negatively correlated with somatostatin receptors type 2 expression and positively correlated with magnetic resonance imaging T2 signal and Ki-67 index. Moreover, elevated choline and choline/creatine ratio differentiated between sparsely and densely granulated GH-secreting PAs. MRS detected low hepatic lipid content in active acromegaly, which increased after disease control. The panel of metabolites of acromegaly deciphered by mass spectrometry (MS)-based techniques mainly included amino acids (especially branched-chain amino acids and taurine), glyceric acid, and lipids. The most altered pathways in acromegaly were the metabolism of glucose (particularly the downregulation of the pentose phosphate pathway), linoleic acid, sphingolipids, glycerophospholipids, arginine/proline, and taurine/hypotaurine. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization coupled with MS imaging confirmed the functional nature of GH-secreting PAs and accurately discriminated PAs from healthy pituitary tissue.
Topics: Humans; Acromegaly; Growth Hormone-Secreting Pituitary Adenoma; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Metabolomics; Adenoma
PubMed: 37139720
DOI: 10.1177/10815589231169452 -
European Journal of Endocrinology Jul 2021To date, no systematic reviews and meta-analysis on the global epidemiology of acromegaly are available in the literature. The aims of this study are to provide a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To date, no systematic reviews and meta-analysis on the global epidemiology of acromegaly are available in the literature. The aims of this study are to provide a systematic review and a meta-analysis of the global epidemiology of acromegaly and to evaluate the quality of study reporting for the identified studies.
METHODS
MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies assessing the epidemiology of acromegaly from inception until 31 January 2020. We included original observational studies written in English, reporting acromegaly prevalence and/or incidence for a well-defined geographic area. Two reviewers independently extracted data and performed quality assessments. Prevalence and incidence pooled estimates were derived by performing a random-effects meta-analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 32 studies were included in the systematic review, and 22 of them were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of acromegaly was 5.9 (95% CI: 4.4-7.9) per 100 000 persons, while the incidence rate (IR) was 0.38 (95% CI: 0.32-0.44) cases per 100 000 person-years. For both prevalence and IR, considerable between-study heterogeneity was found (I2 = 99.3 and 86.0%, respectively). The quality of study reporting was rated as the medium for 20 studies and low for 12 studies.
CONCLUSIONS
Although the largest amount of heterogeneity was due to the high precision of the studies' estimates, data source and geographic area could represent relevant study-level factors which could explain about 50% of the total between-study variability. Large-scale high-quality studies on the epidemiology of acromegaly are warranted to help the public health system in making decisions.
Topics: Acromegaly; Data Accuracy; Epidemiologic Research Design; Geography; Global Health; Humans; Observational Studies as Topic
PubMed: 34061771
DOI: 10.1530/EJE-21-0216 -
PloS One 2023The incidence of cancer in acromegaly patients may be higher than that in the general population, although this has not been fully elucidated yet. This study analyzed... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The incidence of cancer in acromegaly patients may be higher than that in the general population, although this has not been fully elucidated yet. This study analyzed the risk of various important types of cancer in acromegaly patients. The study was registered in INPLASY (registration number: INPLASY202340037). The PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases were searched for studies based on strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, from the time of database inception up to June 30, 2022. All observational studies of acromegaly patients with cancer were included, without language restrictions. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) checklist to assess the quality of evidence. A meta-analysis revealed the relationship between acromegaly and cancer using the standardized incidence rates (SIRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) retrieved from the included studies. Nineteen studies were included and analyzed. The overall incidence of cancer (SIR = 1.45, 95%CI = 1.20-1.75), as well as that of thyroid (SIR = 6.96, 95%CI = 2.51-19.33), colorectal and anal (SIR = 1.95, 95%CI = 1.32-2.87), brain and central nervous system (SIR = 6.14, 95%CI = 2.73-13.84), gastric (SIR = 3.09, 95%CI = 1.47-6.50), urinary (SIR = 2.66, 95%CI = 1.88-3.76), hematological (SIR = 1.89, 95%CI = 1.17-3.06), pancreatic and small intestine (SIR = 2.59, 95%CI = 1.58-4.24), and connective tissue (SIR = 3.15, 95%CI = 1.18-8.36) cancers, was higher among patients with acromegaly than among the general population. No association between acromegaly and hepatobiliary, respiratory, reproductive, skin, breast, or prostate cancer was observed. This study demonstrated that acromegaly patients have a modestly increased chance of cancer as compared to the general population. Risk factors for cancer need to be further explored to monitor patients with acromegaly at a high risk for cancer more carefully.
Topics: Male; Humans; Acromegaly; Neoplasms; Risk Factors; Incidence; Prostatic Neoplasms; Skin
PubMed: 38032888
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285335 -
Value in Health : the Journal of the... Jul 2018Acromegaly results from the hypersecretion of growth hormone. Because of the low incidence rates of this disease worldwide, few clinical trials evaluating drug... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Acromegaly results from the hypersecretion of growth hormone. Because of the low incidence rates of this disease worldwide, few clinical trials evaluating drug treatments have been conducted.
OBJECTIVES
To conduct the first network meta-analysis simultaneously comparing all available drugs used in acromegaly treatment so as to provide more robust evidence in this field.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Cochrane Collaboration recommendations (PROSPERO database under the registration number CRD42017059880). The electronic searches were conducted in PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Randomized controlled trials comparing any drug for the treatment of acromegaly head-to-head or versus placebo were included. Outcomes concerning the efficacy and safety of treatments were evaluated. The statistical analyses were performed using Aggregate Data Drug Information System version 1.16.8 (drugis.org, Groningen, The Netherlands).
RESULTS
The initial search retrieved 2059 articles. Of these, 10 randomized controlled trials were included in a qualitative analysis and 7 in a quantitative analysis. The network meta-analysis for the efficacy outcome (number of patients achieving insulinlike growth factor 1 control) showed that pegvisomant and lanreotide autogel were statistically superior to placebo (odds ratio [95% credible interval] 0.06 [0.00-0.55] and 0.09 [0.01-0.88]). No further differences were found. The probability rank indicated that pegvisomant and pasireotide have the highest probabilities (33% and 34%, respectively) of being the best therapeutic options. No major side effects were noted.
CONCLUSIONS
Pegvisomant is still a good option for acromegaly treatment, but pasireotide seems to be a promising alternative. Nevertheless, other important key factors such as drug costs and effectiveness (real-world results) should be taken into account when selecting acromegaly treatment.
Topics: Acromegaly; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Hormone Antagonists; Human Growth Hormone; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Peptides, Cyclic; Receptors, Somatotropin; Somatostatin; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult
PubMed: 30005760
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.12.014 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Dec 2022Acromegaly is characterized by a very particular alteration of bone microarchitecture, leading to increased vertebral fragility. However, due to inconsistent and... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Acromegaly is characterized by a very particular alteration of bone microarchitecture, leading to increased vertebral fragility. However, due to inconsistent and insufficient evidence, no guidelines are available for the evaluation of this osteopathy.
METHODS
We performed a literature review of studies published between 1968 and January 2022 on the PubMed and SCOPUS databases using the terms "acromegaly" and "vertebral fractures". Twenty-four studies were found eligible for inclusion, published between June 2005 and November 2021. Included studies evaluated acromegaly patients, who were assessed for the presence of vertebral fractures. We excluded case reports, reviews, meta-analyses, letters to the editor, articles not written in English, and research performed on the same set of patients without significant differences in study design. Risk of bias was avoided by following the ROBIS risk of bias recommendations. We executed rigorous data collection, and the results are depicted as a narrative overview, but also, as statistical synthesis. Limitations of the evidence presented in the study include study heterogeneity, small sample sizes, and a small number of prospective studies with short follow-up.
FINDINGS
Data regarding vertebral fractures (VFs) in acromegaly and their influencing factors are variable. Twenty-four studies were included, nine out of which had a prospective design. The smallest group of acromegaly patients had 18 subjects and the largest included 248 patients. Prevalence ranges between 6.5% and 87.1%, although most studies agree that it is significantly higher than in controls. VFs also have a higher incidence (between 5.6% and 42%) and are more frequently multiple (between 46.15% and 71%). Evidence shows that disease activity and active disease duration are influencing factors for the prevalence and incidence of VFs. Nonetheless, hypogonadism does not seem to influence the frequency of VFs. While reports are conflicting regarding the use of bone mineral density in acromegaly, evidence seems to be slightly in favor of it not being associated with VFs. However, trabecular bone score is significantly lower in fractured patients, although no prospective studies are available.
INTERPRETATION
Vertebral fractures evaluation should be performed with regularity in all acromegalic patients, especially in the presence of active disease. Disease activity is an important determinant of vertebral fracture incidence and prevalence, although hypogonadism is less so. To clarify the predictive value of both BMD and TBS for vertebral fractures, additional, larger, prospective studies are necessary.
PubMed: 36614962
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12010164 -
Pituitary Aug 2023Diagnostic delay is high in acromegaly and leads to increased morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study is to systematically assess the most prevalent clinical... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Diagnostic delay is high in acromegaly and leads to increased morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study is to systematically assess the most prevalent clinical signs, symptoms and comorbidities of acromegaly at time of diagnosis.
DESIGN
A literature search (in PubMed, Embase and Web of Science) was performed on November 18, 2021, in collaboration with a medical information specialist.
METHODS
Prevalence data on (presenting) clinical signs, symptoms and comorbidities at time of diagnosis were extracted and synthesized as weighted mean prevalence. The risk of bias was assessed for each included study using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Studies Reporting Prevalence Data.
RESULTS
Risk of bias and heterogeneity was high in the 124 included articles. Clinical signs and symptoms with the highest weighted mean prevalence were: acral enlargement (90%), facial features (65%), oral changes (62%), headache (59%), fatigue/tiredness (53%; including daytime sleepiness: 48%), hyperhidrosis (47%), snoring (46%), skin changes (including oily skin: 37% and thicker skin: 35%), weight gain (36%) and arthralgia (34%). Concerning comorbidities, acromegaly patients more frequently had hypertension, left ventricle hypertrophy, dia/systolic dysfunction, cardiac arrhythmias, (pre)diabetes, dyslipidemia and intestinal polyps- and malignancy than age- and sex matched controls. Noteworthy, cardiovascular comorbidity was lower in more recent studies. Features that most often led to diagnosis of acromegaly were typical physical changes (acral enlargement, facial changes and prognatism), local tumor effects (headache and visual defect), diabetes, thyroid cancer and menstrual disorders.
CONCLUSION
Acromegaly manifests itself with typical physical changes but also leads to a wide variety of common comorbidities, emphasizing that recognition of a combination of these features is key to establishing the diagnosis.
Topics: Humans; Acromegaly; Prevalence; Delayed Diagnosis; Comorbidity; Headache; Hypertension; Diabetes Mellitus
PubMed: 37210433
DOI: 10.1007/s11102-023-01322-7 -
Clinical Endocrinology Jan 2023Acromegaly is a condition characterized by an overproduction of growth hormone which infers high morbidity and mortality if left untreated. The objective of this review... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Acromegaly is a condition characterized by an overproduction of growth hormone which infers high morbidity and mortality if left untreated. The objective of this review is to analyse and appraise the current evidence for the generalized use of preoperative medications and the various surgical approaches as described in the literature.
DESIGN
A thorough search from MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library has been performed which identified a total of 37 papers.
CONCLUSION
The preoperative use of somatostatin receptor agonists (SAs) in acromegaly is a controversial topic with current guidelines suggesting against their generalized routine use. Most authors noticed an insignificant long-term remission of acromegaly when given SAs compared with nil preoperative therapy, except for invasive macroadenomas as SAs have been found to reduce the tumour volume and aid towards the total resection of the adenoma. Furthermore, according to the evidence available, endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery is the optimum method for hypophysectomy in terms of its remission and safety profile.
PubMed: 35726150
DOI: 10.1111/cen.14790 -
European Journal of Endocrinology Jul 2018To compare the acromegaly mortality rates with those expected for the general population from studies published before and after 2008. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To compare the acromegaly mortality rates with those expected for the general population from studies published before and after 2008.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review and included observational studies in which the number of deaths observed in acromegaly was compared with the expected mortality for the general population mortality observed/expected (O/E). The following electronic databases were used as our data sources: EMBASE, MEDLINE and LILACS. From the observed and expected deaths, we recalculated all standardized mortality ratios (SMR) and their respective confidence intervals (95% CI), which were plotted in a meta-analysis using the software RevMan 5.3.
RESULTS
We identified 2303 references, and 26 studies fulfilled our eligibility criteria. From the 17 studies published before 2008, the mortality in acromegaly was increased, while from the nine studies published after 2008, the mortality was not different from the general population (SMR: 1.35, CI: 0.99-1.85). In six studies where somatostatin analogs (SAs) were used as adjuvant treatment, acromegaly mortality was not increased (SMR: 0.98, CI: 0.83-1.15), whereas in series including only patients treated with surgery and/or radiotherapy, mortality was significantly higher (SMR: 2.11; CI: 1.54-2.91). In studies published before and after 2008, the mortality was not increased in patients who achieved biochemical control, while it was higher in those with active disease. Cancer has become a leader cause of deaths in acromegaly patients in the last decade, period in which life expectancy improved.
CONCLUSION
Mortality in acromegaly is normalized with biochemical control and decreased in the last decade with the more frequent use of SAs as adjuvant therapy. Increased life expectancy has been associated with more deaths due to cancer.
Topics: Acromegaly; Cause of Death; Female; Humans; Life Expectancy; Male; Somatostatin
PubMed: 29764907
DOI: 10.1530/EJE-18-0255 -
Journal of Endocrinological... Oct 2022Acromegaly is a rare chronic disease characterized by systemic comorbidity and reduced quality of life. Although achieving biochemical control has always been the... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Acromegaly is a rare chronic disease characterized by systemic comorbidity and reduced quality of life. Although achieving biochemical control has always been the primary goal of acromegaly therapy, recent evidence has shown that the traditional assessment does not adequately capture the complexity of symptoms and patients' perception. These findings result in the need to improve a fast decision-making process of the clinician, who should not only take into account biochemical-instrumental criteria, but also patients' symptoms. With the aim of supporting the clinician in the diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making process several disease-specific tools have been developed. The aim of this review is to provide a description of the acromegaly-specific tools, presenting their main features, their application in daily practice, and their efficacy and utility.
METHODS
A systematic search of Medline/PubMed, ISI-Web of Knowledge, and Google Scholar databases was done.
RESULTS
Specific instruments and questionnaires have recently been developed to assist clinicians in the assessment of acromegaly. These are either Patient-Reported Outcome tools, such as Acromegaly Quality of Life Questionnaire (AcroQoL) and Pain Assessment Acromegaly Symptom Questionnaire (PASQ), or Clinician-Reported Outcome tools, such as ACROSCORE, SAGIT and Acromegaly Disease Activity Tool (ACRODAT). Such tools are extremely flexible and, therefore, have been widely adopted by endocrinologists and other professionals, so much so that they have also been included as recommendations in the 2018 international guidelines.
CONCLUSION
Questionnaires and tools are useful in the management of acromegaly patients. They help clinicians evaluate patients' symptoms and could assist in the evaluation of disease activity.
Topics: Acromegaly; Comorbidity; Databases, Factual; Humans; Quality of Life; Surveys and Questionnaires
PubMed: 35322391
DOI: 10.1007/s40618-022-01782-x