-
BMJ Open Gastroenterology Jun 2021Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer for women and men and the second leading cause of cancer death in the USA. There is emerging evidence that the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer for women and men and the second leading cause of cancer death in the USA. There is emerging evidence that the gut microbiome plays a role in CRC development, and antibiotics are one of the most common exposures that can alter the gut microbiome. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to characterise the association between antibiotic use and colorectal neoplasia.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science for articles that examined the association between antibiotic exposure and colorectal neoplasia (cancer or adenoma) through 15 December 2019. A total of 6031 citations were identified and 6 papers were included in the final analysis. We assessed the association between the level of antibiotic use (defined as number of courses or duration of therapy) and colorectal neoplasia using a random effects model.
RESULTS
Six studies provided 16 estimates of the association between level of antibiotic use and colorectal neoplasia. Individuals with the highest levels of antibiotic exposure had a 10% higher risk of colorectal neoplasia than those with the lowest exposure (effect size: 1.10, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.18). We found evidence of high heterogeneity (I=79%, p=0.0001) but not of publication bias.
CONCLUSIONS
Higher levels of antibiotic exposure is associated with an increased risk of colorectal neoplasia. Given the widespread use of antibiotics in childhood and early adulthood, additional research to further characterise this relationship is needed.
Topics: Adenoma; Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Colorectal Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Male
PubMed: 34083227
DOI: 10.1136/bmjgast-2021-000601 -
International Journal of Environmental... Apr 2021PubMed/Medline, Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE) and Scopus were searched in January 2021 in order to retrieve evidence assessing the association between dietary fibre... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PubMed/Medline, Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE) and Scopus were searched in January 2021 in order to retrieve evidence assessing the association between dietary fibre intake and the risk of colorectal adenoma in adults. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used for the reporting of results. Only primary observational studies were included. Publication bias was estimated through the Egger's test and the visual inspection of the funnel plot. Heterogeneity between studies was calculated with I statistics. The search strategy identified 683 papers, 21 of which were included in our meta-analysis. Having evaluated a total of 157,725 subjects, the results suggest a protective effect of dietary fibre intake against colorectal adenoma. Effect Size (ES) was [0.71 (95% CI = 0.68-0.75), = 0.000)]. Moderate statistical heterogeneity (Chi = 61.68, df = 23, I = 62.71%, = 0.000) was found. Findings show a statistically significant ( = 0.000) and robust association between a higher intake of dietary fibre and a lower risk of colorectal adenoma, considering both the prevalent and incident risk. Moreover, the meta-regression analysis showed a borderline significant negative linear correlation between the amount of dietary fibre intake and colorectal adenoma. Lastly, we performed a subgroup analysis by sex, showing a higher protective effect for men.
Topics: Adenoma; Adult; Colorectal Neoplasms; Dietary Fiber; Humans; Male; Physical Examination
PubMed: 33920845
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18084168 -
Annals of Oncology : Official Journal... Jun 2017Colorectal adenomas are known as precursors for the majority of colorectal carcinomas. While weight gain during adulthood has been identified as a risk factor for... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Colorectal adenomas are known as precursors for the majority of colorectal carcinomas. While weight gain during adulthood has been identified as a risk factor for colorectal cancer, the association is less clear for colorectal adenomas. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify the evidence on this association.
METHODS
We searched Medline up to September 2016 to identify observational (prospective, cross-sectional and retrospective) studies on weight gain during adulthood and colorectal adenoma occurrence and recurrence. We conducted meta-analysis on high weight gain versus stable weight, linear and non-linear dose-response meta-analyses to analyze the association. Summary odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using a random effects model.
RESULTS
For colorectal adenoma occurrence, the summary OR was 1.39 (95% CI: 1.17-1.65; I2: 43%, N = 9 studies, cases = 5507) comparing high (midpoint: 17.4 kg) versus stable weight gain during adulthood and with each 5 kg weight gain the odds increased by 7% (2%-11%; I2: 65%, N = 7 studies). Although there was indication of non-linearity (Pnon-linearity < 0.001) there was an increased odds of colorectal adenoma throughout the whole range of weight gain. Three studies were identified investigating the association between weight gain and colorectal adenoma recurrence and data were limited to draw firm conclusions.
CONCLUSIONS
Even a small amount of adult weight gain was related to a higher odds of colorectal adenoma occurrence. Our findings add to the benefits of weight control in adulthood regarding colorectal adenoma occurrence, which might be relevant for early prevention of colorectal cancer.
Topics: Adenoma; Adult; Colorectal Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Weight Gain
PubMed: 28327995
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx080 -
Journal of Gastroenterology and... Feb 2023Multiple computer-aided techniques utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) have been created to improve the detection of polyps during colonoscopy and thereby reduce the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND AND AIM
Multiple computer-aided techniques utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) have been created to improve the detection of polyps during colonoscopy and thereby reduce the incidence of colorectal cancer. While adenoma detection rates (ADR) and polyp detection rates (PDR) are important colonoscopy quality indicators, adenoma miss rates (AMR) may better quantify missed lesions, which can ultimately lead to interval colorectal cancer. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the efficacy of computer-aided colonoscopy (CAC) with respect to AMR, ADR, and PDR in randomized controlled trials.
METHODS
A comprehensive, systematic literature search was performed across multiple databases in September of 2022 to identify randomized, controlled trials that compared CAC with traditional colonoscopy. Primary outcomes were AMR, ADR, and PDR.
RESULTS
Fourteen studies totaling 10 928 patients were included in the final analysis. There was a 65% reduction in the adenoma miss rate with CAC (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.25-0.49, P < 0.001, I = 50%). There was a 78% reduction in the sessile serrated lesion miss rate with CAC (OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.08-0.65, P < 0.01, I = 0%). There was a 52% increase in ADR in the CAC group compared with the control group (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.39-1.67, P = 0.04, I = 47%). There was 93% increase in the number of adenomas > 10 mm detected per colonoscopy with CAC (OR 1.93; 95% CI, 1.18-3.16, P < 0.01, I = 0%).
CONCLUSIONS
The results of the present study demonstrate the promise of CAC in improving AMR, ADR, PDR across a spectrum of size and morphological lesion characteristics.
Topics: Humans; Colonic Polyps; Artificial Intelligence; Colonoscopy; Adenoma; Computers; Colorectal Neoplasms
PubMed: 36350048
DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16059 -
The European Respiratory Journal Jun 2020The European Respiratory Society (ERS)/European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS)/European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)/European Society for...
The European Respiratory Society (ERS)/European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS)/European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)/European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) task force brought together experts to update previous 2009 ERS/ESTS guidelines on management of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), a rare cancer with globally poor outcome, after a systematic review of the 2009-2018 literature. The evidence was appraised using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. The evidence syntheses were discussed and recommendations formulated by this multidisciplinary group of experts. Diagnosis: pleural biopsies remain the gold standard to confirm the diagnosis, usually obtained by thoracoscopy but occasionally image-guided percutaneous needle biopsy in cases of pleural symphysis or poor performance status. Pathology: standard staining procedures are insufficient in ∼10% of cases, justifying the use of specific markers, including and () for the separation of atypical mesothelial proliferation from MPM. Staging: in the absence of a uniform, robust and validated staging system, we advise using the most recent 2016 8th TNM (tumour, node, metastasis) classification, with an algorithm for pre-therapeutic assessment. Monitoring: patient's performance status, histological subtype and tumour volume are the main prognostic factors of clinical importance in routine MPM management. Other potential parameters should be recorded at baseline and reported in clinical trials. Treatment: (chemo)therapy has limited efficacy in MPM patients and only selected patients are candidates for radical surgery. New promising targeted therapies, immunotherapies and strategies have been reviewed. Because of limited data on the best combination treatment, we emphasise that patients who are considered candidates for a multimodal approach, including radical surgery, should be treated as part of clinical trials in MPM-dedicated centres.
Topics: Humans; Medical Oncology; Mesothelioma; Mesothelioma, Malignant; Pleural Neoplasms; Surgeons
PubMed: 32451346
DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00953-2019 -
Oral Oncology Oct 2022Carcinoma ex Pleomorphic Adenoma (CXPA) is a rare primary salivary gland malignancy, typically arising from a pre-existing pleomorphic adenoma. This systematic review... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
Carcinoma ex Pleomorphic Adenoma (CXPA) is a rare primary salivary gland malignancy, typically arising from a pre-existing pleomorphic adenoma. This systematic review examines prognostic factors affecting overall survival (OS) in major and minor salivary gland CXPA.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Systematic review of MEDLINE, Cochrane, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Open Grey databases from inception to 31st March 2022 for all English-language literature pertaining to 'carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma'. All study types with greater than five patients with CXPA of the major and minor salivary glands were eligible for inclusion.
RESULTS
Of 8143 studies, 39 studies (n = 5637 patients) meeting the inclusion criteria were included. Median OS at one, three, five, and ten years were 90.0 %, 72.0 %, 61.9 %, and 45.0 % respectively for all CXPA. Higher staging, T stage, nodal disease, grading, and invasion ≥ 1.5 mm had worse outcomes. Histological subtype, perineural invasion, and radiotherapy did not demonstrate a consistent trend. Three studies were evaluated to have high risk of bias, and was removed for sensitivity analysis.
CONCLUSION
Survival outcomes worsen with time for all salivary gland CXPA. Further research on histopathological features and the utility of radiation therapy is required to guide patient selection for more aggressive treatment.
REGISTRATION
CRD42021238544 (PROSPERO).
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adenoma, Pleomorphic; Humans; Prognosis; Salivary Gland Neoplasms; Salivary Glands, Minor
PubMed: 35921695
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2022.106052 -
Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology Feb 2013Obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥30) or overweight (25 ≤ BMI ≤29.9) has been reported to be a risk factor for colorectal adenoma (CRA). However, this association... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
Obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥30) or overweight (25 ≤ BMI ≤29.9) has been reported to be a risk factor for colorectal adenoma (CRA). However, this association remains controversial. The aim of this study was to determine the association between overweight or obesity and CRA.
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using English language studies from EMBASE and MEDLINE. Appropriate observational studies were selected from 1966 through September 2011. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were extracted from each study.
RESULTS
One hundred and seventy full-text articles were reviewed after retrieving 1199 initial search results. Five studies in which BMI was treated as continuous variable, three studies in which BMI was dichotomized using a cutoff value of 25, three studies in which BMI was categorized into three groups using values of 22 and 25, and eight studies in which BMI was categorized into three groups using values of 25 and 30 were selected. Regarding risk for CRA, pooled OR [95% CI] of one increment increase in BMI was 1.02 [0.99-1.03] (random effects model [REM]), while that of BMI ≥ 25 was 1.27 [1.15-1.4] (Fixed effects model). Pooled ORs [95% CI] of BMI ≥ 22 and BMI ≥ 25 was 1.42 [0.69-2.9] [REM] and 1.81 [0.36-9.1] [REM], respectively. Pooled ORs [95% CI] of BMI ≥ 25 and BMI ≥ 30 was 1.16 [0.98-1.38] [REM] and 1.47 [1.18-1.83] [REM], respectively.
CONCLUSION
Obesity and overweight are significant risk factors for CRA. However, there are no data showing linear relationship between increasing BMI and CRA.
Topics: Adenoma; Body Mass Index; Colonoscopy; Colorectal Neoplasms; Humans; Models, Statistical; Obesity; Odds Ratio; Overweight; Risk Factors
PubMed: 23130996
DOI: 10.3109/00365521.2012.737364 -
Journal of Human Nutrition and... Dec 2016Current evidence suggests that dietary patterns may play an important role in colorectal cancer risk. The present study aimed to perform a systematic review and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Current evidence suggests that dietary patterns may play an important role in colorectal cancer risk. The present study aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies exploring the association between dietary patterns and colorectal adenomas (a precancerous condition).
METHODS
Pubmed and EMBASE electronic databases were systematically searched to retrieve eligible studies. Only studies exploring the risk or association with colorectal adenomas for the highest versus lowest category of exposure to a posteriori dietary patterns were included in the quantitative analysis. Random-effects models were applied to calculate relative risks (RRs) of colorectal adenomas for high adherence to healthy or unhealthy dietary patterns. Statistical heterogeneity and publication bias were explored.
RESULTS
Twelve studies were reviewed. Three studies explored a priori dietary patterns using scores identifying adherence to the Mediterranean, Paleolithic and Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet and reported an association with decreased colorectal adenoma risk. Two studies tested the association with colorectal adenomas between a posteriori dietary patterns showing lower odds of disease related to plant-based compared to meat-based dietary patterns. Seven studies identified 23 a posteriori dietary patterns and the analysis revealed that higher adherence to healthy and unhealthy dietary patterns was significantly associated risk of colorectal adenomas (RR = 0.81, 95% confidence interval = 0.71, 0.94 and RR = 1.24, 95% confidence interval = 1.13, 1.35, respectively) with no evidence of heterogeneity or publication bias.
CONCLUSIONS
The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that dietary patterns may be associated with the risk of colorectal adenomas.
Topics: Adenoma; Adult; Aged; Colorectal Neoplasms; Diet; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Observational Studies as Topic; Risk Factors
PubMed: 27412573
DOI: 10.1111/jhn.12395 -
Colorectal Disease : the Official... Jun 2022Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a cluster of factors including obesity, hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia and hyperlipidaemia. It has been associated with an... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
AIM
Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a cluster of factors including obesity, hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia and hyperlipidaemia. It has been associated with an increased risk of colorectal neoplasia. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the association between MetS and (i) recurrence of adenomas or occurrence of CRC in patients with prior adenomas, and (ii) survival in patients with CRC.
METHOD
MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science were searched up to 22 November 2019. Two authors independently conducted title and abstract screening; full text of eligible studies was evaluated. Where ≥3 studies reported effect measures for a specific outcome, meta-analysis using random effects model was conducted. I was used to assess between-study heterogeneity. Quality appraisal was undertaken with the Newcastle-Ottawa Score.
RESULTS
The search identified 1,764 articles, 55 underwent full text screening, resulting in a total of 15 eligible studies. Five studies reported on metachronous neoplasia, with differing outcomes precluded a meta-analysis. No consistent relationship between MetS and metachronous neoplasia was found. Ten studies reported on survival outcomes. MetS was associated with poorer CRC-specific survival (HR = 1.8, 95% CI: 1.04-3.12, I = 92.7%, n = 3). Progression-free survival was also worse but this did not reach statistical significance (HR = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.89-1.42, I = 85.6%, n = 3). There was no association with overall survival (HR = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.94-1.15, I = 43.7%, n = 7). Significant heterogeneity was present but subgroup analysis did not account for this.
CONCLUSION
MetS is associated with poorer CRC-specific survival, but evidence is inconsistent on metachronous neoplasia. Further research is warranted to better understand the impact of MetS on the adenoma-carcinoma pathway.
Topics: Adenoma; Colorectal Neoplasms; Humans; Metabolic Syndrome; Obesity
PubMed: 35156283
DOI: 10.1111/codi.16092 -
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer... Nov 2023Colonoscopy may detect colorectal polyp and facilitate its removal in order to prevent colorectal cancer. However, substantial miss rate for colorectal adenomas... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Colonoscopy may detect colorectal polyp and facilitate its removal in order to prevent colorectal cancer. However, substantial miss rate for colorectal adenomas detection still occurred during screening colonoscopy procedure. Nowadays, artificial intelligence (AI) have been employed in trials to improve polyp detection rate (PDR) and adenoma detection rate (ADR). Therefore, we would like to determine the impact of AI in increasing PDR and ADR.
METHODS
The present study adhered to the guidelines outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses 2020 (PRISMA 2020) statement. To identify relevant literature, comprehensive searches were conducted on major scientific databases, including Pubmed, EBSCO-host, and Proquest. The search was limited to articles published up to November 30, 2022. Inclusion criteria for the study encompassed full-text accessibility, articles written in the English language, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reported both ADR and PDR values, comparing conventional diagnostic methods with AI-aided approaches. To synthesize the data, we computed the combined pooled odds ratio (OR) using a random-effects model. This model was chosen due to the expectation of considerable heterogeneity among the selected studies. To evaluate potential publication bias, the Begg's funnel diagram was employed.
RESULTS
A total of 13 studies were included in this study. Colonoscopy with AI had significantly higher PDR compared to without AI (pooled OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.13-1.89, p = 0.003) and higher ADR (pooled OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.37-1.82, p < 0.00001). PDR analysis showed moderate heterogeneity between included studies (p = 0.004; I2=63%). Furthermore, ADR analysis showed moderate heterogeneity (p < 0.007; I2 = 57%). Additionally, the funnels plot of ADR and PDR analysis showed an asymmetry plot and low publication bias.
CONCLUSION
AI may improve colonoscopy result quality through improving PDR and ADR.
Topics: Humans; Adenoma; Artificial Intelligence; Colonoscopy; Colorectal Neoplasms; Databases, Factual
PubMed: 38019222
DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.11.3655